You named two players. One, who is convicted of sexual assault and has been in jail, and another who has never been accused of anything untoward his entire career.TellMeYouLoveMe said:EvilTroyAndAbed said:KD? You're gonna have to come back here and explain yourself.TellMeYouLoveMe said:
As flattering as it is to hear Ken Starr say Briiles and McCaw are men of integrity and character,
I'd be a lot more impressed if they let their daughters and granddaughters go in a date chaperoned by Tevin Elliott or KD Cannon.
I didn't say Cannon was guilty of anything, just saying it would speak a lot louder if these men of integrity and character were to let their children spend an evening with these gentlemen.
They have...or at least a Facebook post regarding it today.57Bear said:BU lawyers seem to be getting the testimonies sealed almost as quickly as they come out.boognish_bear said:
Baylor has settled a lot of these cases. I wonder why this one hasn't been settled yet because it looks like it's only going to be getting uglier for BU.
I hope they don't settle it though. I'm up for as many under oath testimonies as we can get.
I wonder why Bears for Leadership Reform has not had a release on Ian's testimony.
.boognish_bear said:
quash said:boognish_bear said:
Matt may have missed the part where McCaw acknowledged his mistakes in all this.
According to the MSM, sworn testimony under oath has nowhere near the veracity of a one-off anonymous post on BFans.com from an ISP address somewhere in England.Osodecentx said:or the part where McCaw was under oathquash said:boognish_bear said:
Matt may have missed the part where McCaw acknowledged his mistakes in all this.
This is the most credible poster on this board. The fastest way to catch up what is the truth is to read him like the Bible.Stranger said:quash said:boognish_bear said:
Matt may have missed the part where McCaw acknowledged his mistakes in all this.
I'm with Matt on this. Ian was a weakling as an AD. What he testified was probably mostly true but he was part and parcel complicit in every bit of it. He was the hired lackey of the BOR. Did he play a role in everything he described? Most likely.
It was all his version of the truth. CYA.
xiledinok said:This is the most credible poster on this board. The fastest way to catch up what is the truth is to read him like the Bible.Stranger said:quash said:boognish_bear said:
Matt may have missed the part where McCaw acknowledged his mistakes in all this.
I'm with Matt on this. Ian was a weakling as an AD. What he testified was probably mostly true but he was part and parcel complicit in every bit of it. He was the hired lackey of the BOR. Did he play a role in everything he described? Most likely.
It was all his version of the truth. CYA.
Ian comes out two years after the fact to throw out the race card. He was holding hands with those he now calls racist.
You are without a doubt one of my favorite posters, Stranger, but I respectfully disagree with you on your opinion of Ian as an Athletic Director. I think he was perhaps the best AD we have ever had. I just think his administrative skills sucked, which is definitely part of the job. Ian McCaw brought us the golden age of Baylor sports. Under his watch, we kicked ass and were feared in most every sport. In 2018, we are now feared in Equestrian and Gymnastics and Tumbling.Stranger said:quash said:boognish_bear said:
Matt may have missed the part where McCaw acknowledged his mistakes in all this.
I'm with Matt on this. Ian was a weakling as an AD. What he testified was probably mostly true but he was part and parcel complicit in every bit of it. He was the hired lackey of the BOR. Did he play a role in everything he described? Most likely.
It was all his version of the truth. CYA.
Thanks, I don't look at Facebook often.SIC EM 94 said:They have...or at least a Facebook post regarding it today.57Bear said:BU lawyers seem to be getting the testimonies sealed almost as quickly as they come out.boognish_bear said:
Baylor has settled a lot of these cases. I wonder why this one hasn't been settled yet because it looks like it's only going to be getting uglier for BU.
I hope they don't settle it though. I'm up for as many under oath testimonies as we can get.
I wonder why Bears for Leadership Reform has not had a release on Ian's testimony.
80sBEAR said:You are without a doubt one of my favorite posters, Stranger, but I respectfully disagree with you on your opinion of Ian as an Athletic Director. I think he was perhaps the best AD we have ever had. I just think his administrative skills sucked, which is definitely part of the job. Ian McCaw brought us the golden age of Baylor sports. Under his watch, we kicked ass and were feared in most every sport. In 2018, we are now feared in Equestrian and Gymnastics and Tumbling.Stranger said:quash said:boognish_bear said:
Matt may have missed the part where McCaw acknowledged his mistakes in all this.
I'm with Matt on this. Ian was a weakling as an AD. What he testified was probably mostly true but he was part and parcel complicit in every bit of it. He was the hired lackey of the BOR. Did he play a role in everything he described? Most likely.
It was all his version of the truth. CYA.
For the record, I think the new Gong Show sucks. Not even close to the original. God Bless Chuck Barris. Where the Hell is Gene Gene the Dancing Machine? Is he still alive?
Texas knocked Nebraska down to being average.Eastside Bear said:
X actually went to Baylor? I thought he was our resident Sooner troll.
Stranger, I am not doubting the veracity of your post, but my personal experience with Ian was much different than yours. I met Ian when I worked at The Men's Wearhouse in Waco, back in 2004-5, and chatted with him on a couple of occasions. Several years later, I was walking into Floyd Casey Stadium one Saturday, and noticed Ian walking out, headed in my direction. He walked right up to me and immediately greeted me by name, asked me how I was doing, and said that it was good to see me again. I was impressed, because I was just a rank and file season ticket-holder, a little guy with a relatively large mustache.Stranger said:
As for Ian, he couldn't raise money, he couldn't remember anybody's name and he couldn't administer jack squat nothing. All of which were in his job description.
I once heard him address a large group of alumni and refer to our former icon coach as Grant Teef (rhymes with teeth). What a loser.
I had a two hour face to face meeting with him where we worked out a gift to the athletic department. I saw him the next day in a skybox and he introduced himself and said he'd never met me. I guess I didn't make much of an impression. I never had much use for him after that.
Several former lettermen I know just hated to see the guy coming. Never thought he was slightly invested in being at Baylor.
He was just a tool of the BOR. Never stood up for his coaches.
Ribbon clerk.
Just my biased opinion.
Yeah, the new Gong Show sucks. Haven't seen Gene Gene in years. Good guy. So was Chuck. RIP.
Y'all must have been running a sale on brown suits and knit shirts that buttoned all the way to the neck.The Stache said:Stranger said:
I met Ian when I worked at The Men's Wearhouse in Waco, back in 2004-5, and chatted with him on a couple of occasions.

I don't need to do anything, I neither accused nor convicted anyone, merely suggested they act as chaperones.EvilTroyAndAbed said:You named two players. One, who is convicted of sexual assault and has been in jail, and another who has never been accused of anything untoward his entire career.TellMeYouLoveMe said:EvilTroyAndAbed said:KD? You're gonna have to come back here and explain yourself.TellMeYouLoveMe said:
As flattering as it is to hear Ken Starr say Briiles and McCaw are men of integrity and character,
I'd be a lot more impressed if they let their daughters and granddaughters go in a date chaperoned by Tevin Elliott or KD Cannon.
I didn't say Cannon was guilty of anything, just saying it would speak a lot louder if these men of integrity and character were to let their children spend an evening with these gentlemen.
You need to explain better why you lumped in KD with Elliott.
This is as good a time as any to thank The erstwhile Moderator of Baylorfans.com, Marco, now masquerading as Reporter, for allowing Texas Monthly to use Baylorfans as a source.whitetrash said:According to the MSM, sworn testimony under oath has nowhere near the veracity of a one-off anonymous post on BFans.com from an ISP address somewhere in England.Osodecentx said:or the part where McCaw was under oathquash said:boognish_bear said:
Matt may have missed the part where McCaw acknowledged his mistakes in all this.
It was the Forrest Gump Sale just after Easter. What a deal!!!whitetrash said:Y'all must have been running a sale on brown suits and knit shirts that buttoned all the way to the neck.The Stache said:Stranger said:
I met Ian when I worked at The Men's Wearhouse in Waco, back in 2004-5, and chatted with him on a couple of occasions.
I believe it was Pepper Hamilton that made mention of black athletes having consensual sex with white girls.xiledinok said:This is the most credible poster on this board. The fastest way to catch up what is the truth is to read him like the Bible.Stranger said:quash said:boognish_bear said:
Matt may have missed the part where McCaw acknowledged his mistakes in all this.
I'm with Matt on this. Ian was a weakling as an AD. What he testified was probably mostly true but he was part and parcel complicit in every bit of it. He was the hired lackey of the BOR. Did he play a role in everything he described? Most likely.
It was all his version of the truth. CYA.
Ian comes out two years after the fact to throw out the race card. He was holding hands with those he now calls racist.
Stranger said:80sBEAR said:You are without a doubt one of my favorite posters, Stranger, but I respectfully disagree with you on your opinion of Ian as an Athletic Director. I think he was perhaps the best AD we have ever had. I just think his administrative skills sucked, which is definitely part of the job. Ian McCaw brought us the golden age of Baylor sports. Under his watch, we kicked ass and were feared in most every sport. In 2018, we are now feared in Equestrian and Gymnastics and Tumbling.Stranger said:quash said:boognish_bear said:
Matt may have missed the part where McCaw acknowledged his mistakes in all this.
I'm with Matt on this. Ian was a weakling as an AD. What he testified was probably mostly true but he was part and parcel complicit in every bit of it. He was the hired lackey of the BOR. Did he play a role in everything he described? Most likely.
It was all his version of the truth. CYA.
For the record, I think the new Gong Show sucks. Not even close to the original. God Bless Chuck Barris. Where the Hell is Gene Gene the Dancing Machine? Is he still alive?
Thanks for good words. The feeling is mutual.
As for Ian, he couldn't raise money, he couldn't remember anybody's name and he couldn't administer jack squat nothing. All of which were in his job description.
I once heard him address a large group of alumni and refer to our former icon coach as Grant Teef (rhymes with teeth). What a loser.
I had a two hour face to face meeting with him where we worked out a gift to the athletic department. I saw him the next day in a skybox and he introduced himself and said he'd never met me. I guess I didn't make much of an impression. I never had much use for him after that.
Several former lettermen I know just hated to see the guy coming. Never thought he was slightly invested in being at Baylor.
He was just a tool of the BOR. Never stood up for his coaches.
Ribbon clerk.
Just my biased opinion.
Yeah, the new Gong Show sucks. Haven't seen Gene Gene in years. Good guy. So was Chuck. RIP.
I did read somewhere that in his very first football game at his new gig with that little podunk Bible school in Lynchburg, VA. that his team took out a Power 5 school. That does sound pretty far-fetched. Probably bull***** Like they say, don't believe everything you read on the internet. LOL! I heard it took damn near six months for him to get the smile off of his face.TellMeYouLoveMe said:
In Ian's parting defense, do I think he was controlled by specific regents? Absolutely. And those regents need to burn. But to suggest that Ian was accomplished, or successful is stretching it at best.
So you are proud that he didn't try to pull a Garland in the deposition or didn't know how to do it?PartyBear said:
If Ian was so weak a person as y'all claim how can he also be so involved in the things he was speaking about under oath. He can't be weak and running the show. I think the argument he was weak is consistent with the shxt he said under oath he was having to deal with. It's also not like he went 2 years later to the press. He was compelled to answer questions about all of this under oath and that deposition was recently leaked to the press. Hate to tell you bubble dwellers but it is all adding up.
https://www.fhmbk.com/attorney/stephen-d-henninger/boognish_bear said:
Perfect match.