This clearly intimates he was a CNN reporter and not a German writer who won an award from CNN for another source years ago.
It's pathetic.
It's pathetic.
who said I had a job?BrooksBearLives said:
So you have a job outside of this?
Congrats, I guess?
LOL - nice try to spin this. Do you want them to change the title? It's an award for journalists that's LITERALLY CALLED CNN's Journalist of the Year.BrooksBearLives said:
This clearly intimates he was a CNN reporter and not a German writer who won an award from CNN for another source years ago.
It's pathetic.
BrooksBearLives said:
I'm still waiting on your reply on the other thread where I proved everything I said was correct (with sources).
You got strangely quiet.
GrowlTowel said:BrooksBearLives said:
I'm still waiting on your reply on the other thread where I proved everything I said was correct (with sources).
You got strangely quiet.
Which thread? I have been watching you get your ass kicked for several weeks now.
Liberal debating 101. Deflect, ignore the facts and spin it about something else.BrooksBearLives said:
You know for a guy who doesn't care, you've been spending a lot of time @ me.
It's clearly misleading from a guy about to go to jail for -guess what? - lying. I don't know why I'm even disappointed in you anymore.
BrooksBearLives said:
This is where you jump back in? Fitting.
riflebear said:Liberal debating 101. Deflect, ignore the facts and spin it about something else.BrooksBearLives said:
You know for a guy who doesn't care, you've been spending a lot of time @ me.
It's clearly misleading from a guy about to go to jail for -guess what? - lying. I don't know why I'm even disappointed in you anymore.
Thanks again for proving you are just the same as all the others. You have an entire case of egg on your face for your posts earlier trying to mock us for something that ended up being true. Then mocking us again for 'not reading' an article when you didn't even read the article that would have shown you it was TRUE.
LOL - have a good night. I'm not on here to win arguments or debates, just present info as much as possible but you tried to attack all of us and it backfired in a huge way.
BrooksBearLives said:riflebear said:Liberal debating 101. Deflect, ignore the facts and spin it about something else.BrooksBearLives said:
You know for a guy who doesn't care, you've been spending a lot of time @ me.
It's clearly misleading from a guy about to go to jail for -guess what? - lying. I don't know why I'm even disappointed in you anymore.
Thanks again for proving you are just the same as all the others. You have an entire case of egg on your face for your posts earlier trying to mock us for something that ended up being true. Then mocking us again for 'not reading' an article when you didn't even read the article that would have shown you it was TRUE.
LOL - have a good night. I'm not on here to win arguments or debates, just present info as much as possible but you tried to attack all of us and it backfired in a huge way.
I get it. Your dear idol, DJT has been taking it in the bone spurs the last year. You really want a W. Pretty desperate for it. Admit it. You had no idea this was a German writer that you've never read. You didn't really care. You just liked the headline because it backed up your world view that CNN publishes lies about Trump.
You NEED that vindication after having proof that your precious Grifter-in-chief is a racist, colluding, treasonous, clueless, moron who could **** up a wet dream for the last year.
If you want to use my sharing the wrong link as a win, man, with your level of delusion, I can't stop you.
History will not remember Trump fondly (no one who works for him does, Mattis included). And history is not going to remember you that fondly, either. Your excellent posts on all things basketball are the only thing that make me wonder if you've lost it altogether.
Florda_mike said:GrowlTowel said:BrooksBearLives said:
I'm still waiting on your reply on the other thread where I proved everything I said was correct (with sources).
You got strangely quiet.
Which thread? I have been watching you get your ass kicked for several weeks now.
BBL will never admit it and he never stops posting
Relentless BS
Hes one of the most successful business men in NY history and he won because Wikileaks exposed the Democratic party's outrageous corruption.BrooksBearLives said:
Mike. If there was such a thing as the "deep state democrats" then they wouldn't have gotten beaten by the worst businessman in New York.
Doc Holliday said:Hes one of the most successful business men in NY history and he won because Wikileaks exposed the Democratic party's outrageous corruption.BrooksBearLives said:
Mike. If there was such a thing as the "deep state democrats" then they wouldn't have gotten beaten by the worst businessman in New York.
And if you still vote for them knowing the corruption...you're no better than what you claim you're against.
Wow, Trump is seriously building a wall inside your head.BrooksBearLives said:riflebear said:Liberal debating 101. Deflect, ignore the facts and spin it about something else.BrooksBearLives said:
You know for a guy who doesn't care, you've been spending a lot of time @ me.
It's clearly misleading from a guy about to go to jail for -guess what? - lying. I don't know why I'm even disappointed in you anymore.
Thanks again for proving you are just the same as all the others. You have an entire case of egg on your face for your posts earlier trying to mock us for something that ended up being true. Then mocking us again for 'not reading' an article when you didn't even read the article that would have shown you it was TRUE.
LOL - have a good night. I'm not on here to win arguments or debates, just present info as much as possible but you tried to attack all of us and it backfired in a huge way.
I get it. Your dear idol, DJT has been taking it in the bone spurs the last year. You really want a W. Pretty desperate for it. Admit it. You had no idea this was a German writer that you've never read. You didn't really care. You just liked the headline because it backed up your world view that CNN publishes lies about Trump.
You NEED that vindication after having proof that your precious Grifter-in-chief is a racist, colluding, treasonous, clueless, moron who could **** up a wet dream for the last year.
If you want to use my sharing the wrong link as a win, man, with your level of delusion, I can't stop you.
History will not remember Trump fondly (no one who works for him does, Mattis included). And history is not going to remember you that fondly, either. Your excellent posts on all things basketball are the only thing that make me wonder if you've lost it altogether.
riflebear said:Wow, Trump is seriously building a wall inside your head.BrooksBearLives said:riflebear said:Liberal debating 101. Deflect, ignore the facts and spin it about something else.BrooksBearLives said:
You know for a guy who doesn't care, you've been spending a lot of time @ me.
It's clearly misleading from a guy about to go to jail for -guess what? - lying. I don't know why I'm even disappointed in you anymore.
Thanks again for proving you are just the same as all the others. You have an entire case of egg on your face for your posts earlier trying to mock us for something that ended up being true. Then mocking us again for 'not reading' an article when you didn't even read the article that would have shown you it was TRUE.
LOL - have a good night. I'm not on here to win arguments or debates, just present info as much as possible but you tried to attack all of us and it backfired in a huge way.
I get it. Your dear idol, DJT has been taking it in the bone spurs the last year. You really want a W. Pretty desperate for it. Admit it. You had no idea this was a German writer that you've never read. You didn't really care. You just liked the headline because it backed up your world view that CNN publishes lies about Trump.
You NEED that vindication after having proof that your precious Grifter-in-chief is a racist, colluding, treasonous, clueless, moron who could **** up a wet dream for the last year.
If you want to use my sharing the wrong link as a win, man, with your level of delusion, I can't stop you.
History will not remember Trump fondly (no one who works for him does, Mattis included). And history is not going to remember you that fondly, either. Your excellent posts on all things basketball are the only thing that make me wonder if you've lost it altogether.
And I've said 1000 times, I'm not the biggest fan of Trump and I call him out all the time, but I would take him 100% of the time over any radical Democrat - especially Hillary. I'm on here to expose the media more than to support Trump. If you read anything the last several years you would know that, just like if you read your response to a tweet & the actual article you posted you wouldn't have EGG ON YOUR FACE...AGAIN.
Brooksbear new profile pic
BBL, you did a great job addressing the business side of DT. However, I have also noticed that you make a habit of not addressing democratic issues. This is your chance buddy. Give me an honest opinion of the coruption exposed by Wikileaks. At the end of your response you can add in the statement "but that still not as bad as Trump!"BrooksBearLives said:Doc Holliday said:Hes one of the most successful business men in NY history and he won because Wikileaks exposed the Democratic party's outrageous corruption.BrooksBearLives said:
Mike. If there was such a thing as the "deep state democrats" then they wouldn't have gotten beaten by the worst businessman in New York.
And if you still vote for them knowing the corruption...you're no better than what you claim you're against.
He got half a billion dollars from his Daddy to buy Real Estate in New York when prices were near nothing.
You could have thrown a dart and bought land and made as much money as he did. How many of those deals ended up going bankrupt? How many small businesses did he **** over in the process? 3,000 suits against him for fraud/breech of contracts.
Come on.
LIB,MR BEARS said:BBL, you did a great job addressing the business side of DT. However, I have also noticed that you make a habit of not addressing democratic issues. This is your chance buddy. Give me an honest opinion of the coruption exposed by Wikileaks. At the end of your response you can add in the statement "but that still not as bad as Trump!"BrooksBearLives said:Doc Holliday said:Hes one of the most successful business men in NY history and he won because Wikileaks exposed the Democratic party's outrageous corruption.BrooksBearLives said:
Mike. If there was such a thing as the "deep state democrats" then they wouldn't have gotten beaten by the worst businessman in New York.
And if you still vote for them knowing the corruption...you're no better than what you claim you're against.
He got half a billion dollars from his Daddy to buy Real Estate in New York when prices were near nothing.
You could have thrown a dart and bought land and made as much money as he did. How many of those deals ended up going bankrupt? How many small businesses did he **** over in the process? 3,000 suits against him for fraud/breech of contracts.
Come on.
Ready, GO!
That would be tough to do because I don't hate conservatism. I have a great deal of contempt for Republicans who claim to be conservative but their actions speak otherwise.BrooksBearLives said:LIB,MR BEARS said:BBL, you did a great job addressing the business side of DT. However, I have also noticed that you make a habit of not addressing democratic issues. This is your chance buddy. Give me an honest opinion of the coruption exposed by Wikileaks. At the end of your response you can add in the statement "but that still not as bad as Trump!"BrooksBearLives said:Doc Holliday said:Hes one of the most successful business men in NY history and he won because Wikileaks exposed the Democratic party's outrageous corruption.BrooksBearLives said:
Mike. If there was such a thing as the "deep state democrats" then they wouldn't have gotten beaten by the worst businessman in New York.
And if you still vote for them knowing the corruption...you're no better than what you claim you're against.
He got half a billion dollars from his Daddy to buy Real Estate in New York when prices were near nothing.
You could have thrown a dart and bought land and made as much money as he did. How many of those deals ended up going bankrupt? How many small businesses did he **** over in the process? 3,000 suits against him for fraud/breech of contracts.
Come on.
Ready, GO!
Corruption? I think that's a little strong. There was definitely some inside baseball and those trying to put thumbs on the scales for Hillary. But Hillary has the nomination pretty much wrapped up.
But I'm not a democrat. I have disdain for the Republican Party because they've completely abdicated any moral standing they ever had.
I've voted for more Republicans for President in my life than Dems. But that **** is over until they completely rid themselves of the Trump Rot.
But I'll tell you what. If you want to talk about problems we have with liberals, I am HAPPY to. But you have to return the favor and show what you hate about conservatism first. Im totally outnumbered here.
BrooksBearLives said:
Mike. If there was such a thing as the "deep state democrats" then they wouldn't have gotten beaten by the worst businessman in New York.
DNC was alleged to be hacked by SVR or whatever but not proven... Hillary server and others were attacked by GRU which has been proven.BrooksBearLives said:
Ohhh, my bad. I'm sincerely sorry I misunderstood.
Jesus. Wikileaks? Where to start? Julian Assange is a trash human being. I'm not sure anyone truly disagrees with that. He was talking to Roger Stone throughout the election because he sincerely hates Hillary (because the Bush/Obama administrations is pretty much the reason he's living in an embassy and Hillary really put the screws to him).
He got the DNC info from the Russians. That's fact. (We now know the RNC was busted, too, but nothing from that was leaked). The strangest one was the coordinated attacks on Clinton's age/mental faculties because she got sick and hit her head at one point? That was intercepted in emails but leaked to Stone ahead of time -who then coordinated with the Trump Campaign. This is all known and proven.
But most of the rest was all stuff that showed Clinton and her campaign -especially Podesta- we're cynical ****-heads and political operators. But nothing actually criminal.
I really didn't like Hillary. But she was competent and would have been okay. We would have serious people in government and a ****-ton less tweeting. She would have been status-quo. She's NOT a hard liberal.
Did you have something in mind?
Yes, whine for more govt. while claiming to be conservative.riflebear said:
Twitter - Pro Pakistan, Anti Conservative.
Sounds normal for an American company.