Waco1947 said:
This is silliness. You have no proof.
Proof of what?
Culture & Society in 2018....
94,094 Views |
791 Replies |
Last: 7 yr ago by quash
Proof of what?
Con. Jordan is one of the back benchers. He interrupts the guy trying to answer the question "Could you...?" with "It's a fact."riflebear said:
No, Congressman, a question is not a fact. You may have inserted a fact in there, but questions are not facts.
Next time try this: "Is it a fact that Donald Trump is president?" Then, if the guy answers "Well, it depends..." you can jump in and tell him it's a fact.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
quash said:Con. Jordan is one of the back benchers. He interrupts the guy trying to answer the question "Could you...?" with "It's a fact."riflebear said:
No, Congressman, a question is not a fact. You may have inserted a fact in there, but questions are not facts.
Next time try this: "Is it a fact that Donald Trump is president?" Then, if the guy answers "Well, it depends..." you can jump in and tell him it's a fact.
^^^ Your brain ....... on drugs!
Don't do drugs!!!
Florda_mike said:quash said:Con. Jordan is one of the back benchers. He interrupts the guy trying to answer the question "Could you...?" with "It's a fact."riflebear said:
No, Congressman, a question is not a fact. You may have inserted a fact in there, but questions are not facts.
Next time try this: "Is it a fact that Donald Trump is president?" Then, if the guy answers "Well, it depends..." you can jump in and tell him it's a fact.
^^^ Your brain ....... on drugs!
Don't do drugs!!!
I don't do drugs. But I don't want the state to stop you or jail you for doing drugs.
And Con. Jordan is still a back bencher.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
It shows the academe is not rushing toward the apocalypse. Acorns, not sky.riflebear said:Agree or disagree w/ this?quash said:
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Acorns.Sam Lowry said:I think it implies the opposite. If this example were representative of academe, they wouldn't refer to it as "amazing."quash said:It shows the academe is not rushing toward the apocalypse. Acorns, not sky.riflebear said:Agree or disagree w/ this?quash said:
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
I'm not really interested in trying to reduce it to acorns vs. sky. I do know that identity politics are a significant force in academe. If anything, the tweet tends to prove it more than not.quash said:Acorns.Sam Lowry said:I think it implies the opposite. If this example were representative of academe, they wouldn't refer to it as "amazing."quash said:It shows the academe is not rushing toward the apocalypse. Acorns, not sky.riflebear said:Agree or disagree w/ this?quash said:
I'm still waiting for the day that the left eats itself alive.
It's already starting to happen.
Make no mistake, this country will go so far radically to the left that current leftists will be demonized in the way that they currently demonize Republicans.
You'll get a taste of your own medicine and realize exactly what the **** you've been pushing for years. It's going to be a wake up call for many.
It's already starting to happen.
Make no mistake, this country will go so far radically to the left that current leftists will be demonized in the way that they currently demonize Republicans.
You'll get a taste of your own medicine and realize exactly what the **** you've been pushing for years. It's going to be a wake up call for many.
The tweet acknowledges the problem but is also one, of many, responses by educators, administrators and liberal advocates for free speech. This thread pointedly ignores the opposition to grievance studies, identify politics, etc. in favor of a blinkered view.Sam Lowry said:I'm not really interested in trying to reduce it to acorns vs. sky. I do know that identity politics are a significant force in academe. If anything, the tweet tends to prove it more than not.quash said:Acorns.Sam Lowry said:I think it implies the opposite. If this example were representative of academe, they wouldn't refer to it as "amazing."quash said:It shows the academe is not rushing toward the apocalypse. Acorns, not sky.riflebear said:Agree or disagree w/ this?quash said:
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Doc Holliday said:
Could you imagine what a white nan saying same about blacks would be greeted with
This Lemmon punk needs gone
Leaders at a college in Michigan decided to cancel its production of "The Vagina Monologues" because it's discriminatory, given "not all women have vaginas."
The women's resource center at Eastern Michigan University put the kibosh on the famous production since it caters only to women who have the physical anatomy that accompanies the female sex, according to The Ann Arbor News.
The decision came after the resource center conducted a survey, asking respondents about "The Vagina Monologues." Those opposed to the drama said they were concerned about the fact that the production excludes some women, namely those who don't have vaginas.
The women's resource center at Eastern Michigan University put the kibosh on the famous production since it caters only to women who have the physical anatomy that accompanies the female sex, according to The Ann Arbor News.
The decision came after the resource center conducted a survey, asking respondents about "The Vagina Monologues." Those opposed to the drama said they were concerned about the fact that the production excludes some women, namely those who don't have vaginas.
That is the shadow of the lump next to the molehill. About as insignificant as it gets. Read the story, especially the quote from Leeds itself.
I'm offended by political correctness. Why is it not banned? Why are my feelings less important than those of women who were born with male genitalia.
I give a standing jazz-hand to all conservatives
I give a standing jazz-hand to all conservatives