Again, you are merely asserting an opinion, with no evidence to prove why canon is incorrect.
My point is, and my example I gave, shows your faith is built upon taking OT scripture out of context - just what you accuse 47 of doing.Oldbear83 said:
Again, you are merely asserting an opinion, with no evidence to prove why canon is incorrect.
No, because the opinion I hold is one built up by centuries of critical analysis and debate. You are free to ignore it, but pretending Waco's social justice has the academic rigor of even the Council of Nicea is dishonest and lazy.TexasScientist said:My point is, and my example I gave, shows your faith is built upon taking OT scripture out of context - just what you accuse 47 of doing.Oldbear83 said:
Again, you are merely asserting an opinion, with no evidence to prove why canon is incorrect.
TexasScientist said:My point is, and my example I gave, shows your faith is built upon taking OT scripture out of context - just what you accuse 47 of doing.Oldbear83 said:
Again, you are merely asserting an opinion, with no evidence to prove why canon is incorrect.
Waco1947 said:
"KOT"
How does one dialogue with such dismissiveness?
Is your intent to shut one up, to continue dialogue or to prove a person wrong or to brag to your friends that you " owned or destroyed a liberal."
Maybe another choice?
But you did not succeed.
Or is it that you really have no rational thoughts based on dialogue, wisdom, fact, or logic?
Waco1947 said:
Yoak : "Howling Wolf"
How does one dialogue with such dismissiveness?
Is your intent to shut one up, to continue dialogue or to prove a person wrong or to brag to your friends that you " owned or destroyed a liberal."
Maybe another choice?
But you did not succeed.
Or is it that you really have no rational thoughts based on dialogue, wisdom, fact, or logic?
Waco1947 said:
"You are So stupid." Says Shooter
How does one dialogue with such dismissiveness?
Is your intent to shut one up, to continue dialogue or to prove a person wrong or to brag to your friends that you " owned or destroyed a liberal."
Maybe another choice?
But you did not succeed.
Or is it that you really have no rational thoughts based on dialogue, wisdom, fact, or logic?
Waco1947 said:
"You are So stupid." "You are a groot ." Says Shooter
How does one dialogue with such dismissiveness?
Is your intent to shut one up, to continue dialogue or to prove a person wrong or to brag to your friends that you " owned or destroyed a liberal."
Maybe another choice?
But you did not succeed.
Or is it that you really have no rational thoughts based on dialogue, wisdom, fact, or logic?
TexasScientist said:
(I had some kind of glitch and could not post direct to your thread comment above)
Oldbear83 said:
Also, you did not bother to even cite the scriptures you mean, which leaves your argument hollow and without any logical support.
If you want to understand something, it has to be put in its proper context. A classic example of where NT writers attribute OT prophecy out of context is where the writer of Matthew 1:23 not only mistranslated Isaiah 7:14., but also interprets it out of context. The proper and correct translation Is. 7:14 is "The Lord himself will give you a sign. A young woman (Alma) (Bethulah is the Hebrew for virgin) is with child and she will bear a son etc." When the writer of Matthew quoted the verse he did not quote the original Hebrew, but instead he used a Greek translation of the Hebrew scripture which incorrectly substituted a Greek word (Parthenos) which meant a woman who was a virgin. That wasn't what the original Hebrew meant.
Above and beyond that, the writer of Matthew's context is completely different from the context of Isaiah chapters 7 and 8. From those chapters it is clear the prophet is not predicting the coming of the messiah. Rather, his meaning is clear. The king of Judah is concerned about eminent war with Israel and Syria. Isaiah comes to Ahaz and delivers the prophecy that a young woman who is already with child will give birth to a child, and that before the child is old enough to know good from evil, Israel and Syria will withdraw, leaving Judah safe.
The writer of Matthew completely changed the context to further his own agenda. Everything in Matthew's birth narrative is about the fulfillment of prophecy - born in Bethlehem while from Nazareth, escape to Egypt from Herod, virgin birth. He wanted to show that Jesus' birth was fulfillment of a divine plan through the fulfillment of prophecy.
LOLWaco1947 said:Waco1947 said:
"You are So stupid." "You are a griot." Says Shooter
How does one dialogue with such dismissiveness?
Is your intent to shut one up, to continue dialogue or to prove a person wrong or to brag to your friends that you " owned or destroyed a liberal."
Maybe another choice?
But you did not succeed.
Or is it that you really have no rational thoughts based on dialogue, wisdom, fact, or logic?
Waco1947 said:
"Groot" a fictional bumbling superhero
How does one dialogue with such dismissiveness?
Is your intent to shut one up, to continue dialogue or to prove a person wrong or to brag to your friends that you " owned or destroyed a liberal."
Maybe another choice?.
Do you have rational thoughts based on dialogue, wisdom, fact, or logic?
Waco1947 said:
"Groot" a fictional bumbling superhero
How does one dialogue with such dismissiveness?
Is your intent to shut one up, to continue dialogue or to prove a person wrong or to brag to your friends that you " owned or destroyed a liberal."
Maybe another choice?.
Do you have rational thoughts based on dialogue, wisdom, fact, or logic?
So Shooter was complimenting me? My apologies then.YoakDaddy said:Waco1947 said:
"Groot" a fictional bumbling superhero
How does one dialogue with such dismissiveness?
Is your intent to shut one up, to continue dialogue or to prove a person wrong or to brag to your friends that you " owned or destroyed a liberal."
Maybe another choice?.
Do you have rational thoughts based on dialogue, wisdom, fact, or logic?
Actually...Groot helped save the universe at least 3 times.
Waco1947 said:So Shooter was complimenting me? My apologies then.YoakDaddy said:Waco1947 said:
"Groot" a fictional bumbling superhero
How does one dialogue with such dismissiveness?
Is your intent to shut one up, to continue dialogue or to prove a person wrong or to brag to your friends that you " owned or destroyed a liberal."
Maybe another choice?.
Do you have rational thoughts based on dialogue, wisdom, fact, or logic?
Actually...Groot helped save the universe at least 3 times.
But...but.... he called me Groot!YoakDaddy said:Waco1947 said:So Shooter was complimenting me? My apologies then.YoakDaddy said:Waco1947 said:
"Groot" a fictional bumbling superhero
How does one dialogue with such dismissiveness?
Is your intent to shut one up, to continue dialogue or to prove a person wrong or to brag to your friends that you " owned or destroyed a liberal."
Maybe another choice?.
Do you have rational thoughts based on dialogue, wisdom, fact, or logic?
Actually...Groot helped save the universe at least 3 times.
Ha Ha. No. Groot wasn't bumbling.