It's been delayed over the last 8 months because they kept finding information. That's according to Horowitz/DOJ.cinque said:
Somebody on this board boasted that the report would be here in October.
I think they got them this time.RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:
The bad actors will be put in timeout, laugh their asses off, and write books. This will be confirmation that the Swamp will always take care of their own. No matter which side of the political aisle.
Millions have heard or looked into this. Fox News averages 2.4 million viewers and they talk about this every week.fubar said:
"Millions" of people have "researched" this? And you wonder why people don't take you seriously.
But by all means, let's prosecute people so that some Bubbas don't get angry and go shoot up the town.
Someone on this board boasted we would have pee pee tapes by now...cinque said:
Somebody on this board boasted that the report would be here in October.
I do respect Dave's commitment to trolling.contrario said:Someone on this board boasted we would have pee pee tapes by now...cinque said:
Somebody on this board boasted that the report would be here in October.
Chuckle. "The New York Times reported."cinque said:
Chuckle. I tried to tell you cons not to get out ahead of your skis on this report. FBI bias against Trump will not be a finding in this report:
The New York Times also reported that, overall, Horowitz criticized the FBI's handling of the application and renewals for Page, suggesting instances of sloppiness or negligence. But Horowitz is expected to debunk allegations of a broader conspiracy against President Donald Trump
https://www.vox.com/2019/11/22/20977630/inspector-general-report-carter-page-russia-investigation
I assume you were expecting it to be on-time and under-budget, too? HAHAHA.cinque said:
Somebody on this board boasted that the report would be here in October.
NYT also said Trump wasn't spied on, but we both know that's a lie.cinque said:
Chuckle. I tried to tell you cons not to get out ahead of your skis on this report. FBI bias against Trump will not be a finding in this report:
The New York Times also reported that, overall, Horowitz criticized the FBI's handling of the application and renewals for Page, suggesting instances of sloppiness or negligence. But Horowitz is expected to debunk allegations of a broader conspiracy against President Donald Trump
https://www.vox.com/2019/11/22/20977630/inspector-general-report-carter-page-russia-investigation
Watching Fox News equals research?Doc Holliday said:Millions have heard or looked into this. Fox News averages 2.4 million viewers and they talk about this every week.fubar said:
"Millions" of people have "researched" this? And you wonder why people don't take you seriously.
But by all means, let's prosecute people so that some Bubbas don't get angry and go shoot up the town.
You can see trends on #SPYGATE stats on twitter, Dan Bongino, Mark Levin, Jack Posobiec viewership. Well over 30 million hits on this story. The Q anon crazies alone make up over a million people.
You need to read better. I said IF they lay out the crimes...but they refuse charges, people are going to be very angry.
fubar said:Watching Fox News equals research?Doc Holliday said:Millions have heard or looked into this. Fox News averages 2.4 million viewers and they talk about this every week.fubar said:
"Millions" of people have "researched" this? And you wonder why people don't take you seriously.
But by all means, let's prosecute people so that some Bubbas don't get angry and go shoot up the town.
You can see trends on #SPYGATE stats on twitter, Dan Bongino, Mark Levin, Jack Posobiec viewership. Well over 30 million hits on this story. The Q anon crazies alone make up over a million people.
You need to read better. I said IF they lay out the crimes...but they refuse charges, people are going to be very angry.
You researchers may be surprised at the report ... especially if Fox News is your primary source.
Ya, those Strzok Page texts were just simple love letters, had nothing to do w/ taking down a President or having an insurance policy in case he won or completely letting Hillary get away w/ everything so they could start a fake investigation into Trump. How does that have anything to do w/ FoxNews?fubar said:Watching Fox News equals research?Doc Holliday said:Millions have heard or looked into this. Fox News averages 2.4 million viewers and they talk about this every week.fubar said:
"Millions" of people have "researched" this? And you wonder why people don't take you seriously.
But by all means, let's prosecute people so that some Bubbas don't get angry and go shoot up the town.
You can see trends on #SPYGATE stats on twitter, Dan Bongino, Mark Levin, Jack Posobiec viewership. Well over 30 million hits on this story. The Q anon crazies alone make up over a million people.
You need to read better. I said IF they lay out the crimes...but they refuse charges, people are going to be very angry.
You researchers may be surprised at the report ... especially if Fox News is your primary source.
Spied on by whom? And how long before you cons start trashing IG Horowitz as a Dem operative?Doc Holliday said:NYT also said Trump wasn't spied on, but we both know that's a lie.cinque said:
Chuckle. I tried to tell you cons not to get out ahead of your skis on this report. FBI bias against Trump will not be a finding in this report:
The New York Times also reported that, overall, Horowitz criticized the FBI's handling of the application and renewals for Page, suggesting instances of sloppiness or negligence. But Horowitz is expected to debunk allegations of a broader conspiracy against President Donald Trump
https://www.vox.com/2019/11/22/20977630/inspector-general-report-carter-page-russia-investigation
I read/watch a variety, but NPR recently (lots of car time over the past few weeks). When at home watching, PBS and CNN mostly. In print (or online), New York Times.midgett said:fubar said:Watching Fox News equals research?Doc Holliday said:Millions have heard or looked into this. Fox News averages 2.4 million viewers and they talk about this every week.fubar said:
"Millions" of people have "researched" this? And you wonder why people don't take you seriously.
But by all means, let's prosecute people so that some Bubbas don't get angry and go shoot up the town.
You can see trends on #SPYGATE stats on twitter, Dan Bongino, Mark Levin, Jack Posobiec viewership. Well over 30 million hits on this story. The Q anon crazies alone make up over a million people.
You need to read better. I said IF they lay out the crimes...but they refuse charges, people are going to be very angry.
You researchers may be surprised at the report ... especially if Fox News is your primary source.
Fox News isn't my primary source but since you bring it up, who/what is your primary news source?
mmkay.riflebear said:
https://www.foxnews.com/media/jason-chaffetz-trump-fisa-report-inspector-general-mainstream-media
"The Inspector General has now -- if the report is correct -- will be making his fourth referral to the Department of Justice for potential criminal prosecution or inter-agency disciplinary action," Chaffetz explained. "That means the Director of the FBI, the Deputy Director of the FBI, the Deputy Assistant Director of the FBI, and now counsel within the FBI would be recommended for potential criminal prosecution or disciplinary action."
"That is as serious as it gets,"
fubar said:I read/watch a variety, but NPR recently (lots of car time over the past few weeks). When at home watching, PBS and CNN mostly. In print (or online), New York Times.midgett said:fubar said:Watching Fox News equals research?Doc Holliday said:Millions have heard or looked into this. Fox News averages 2.4 million viewers and they talk about this every week.fubar said:
"Millions" of people have "researched" this? And you wonder why people don't take you seriously.
But by all means, let's prosecute people so that some Bubbas don't get angry and go shoot up the town.
You can see trends on #SPYGATE stats on twitter, Dan Bongino, Mark Levin, Jack Posobiec viewership. Well over 30 million hits on this story. The Q anon crazies alone make up over a million people.
You need to read better. I said IF they lay out the crimes...but they refuse charges, people are going to be very angry.
You researchers may be surprised at the report ... especially if Fox News is your primary source.
Fox News isn't my primary source but since you bring it up, who/what is your primary news source?
For the record, however, I didn't bring it up. Doc said that "millions" of people had "researched" this. When I challenged that assertion -- which is on its face preposterous -- he said that millions ... watch Fox News.
And also for the record, the report he and some others have been pimping, and waiting on with bated breath ... never mind. I don't want to spoil it for you.
Except to say that their usual backup plan is already in motion.
I think he did declassify all of the JFK docs last year if I recall.RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:
Even Donald J. Trump is protecting the Swamp / Deep State. Let that sink in!!! (Why has he not released the last of the government documents from the JFK assassination?)
Most, but not all of them. The excuse is "national security" and protecting the identity of intelligence agents. I don't buy it. I don't think foreign entities give a crap about any retired CIA agents that are pooping their diapers and can't remember what they had for dinner last night. The fact that they have all not been released is a little troubling to me.Doc Holliday said:I think he did declassify all of the JFK docs last year if I recall.RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:
Even Donald J. Trump is protecting the Swamp / Deep State. Let that sink in!!! (Why has he not released the last of the government documents from the JFK assassination?)
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:
Even Donald J. Trump is protecting the Swamp / Deep State. Let that sink in!!! (Why has he not released the last of the government documents from the JFK assassination?)
whiterock said:
And GOP is united because they understand their partners in social contract just usurped the powers of government to disenfranchise their position in that social contract.
No way the GOP can allow what Comey, et al did stand. It'd be acquiescing to underclass status....where the purpose of law is to exonerate Democrats and entrap Republicans.
If we're not equal before the law, we're not free.
NPR, PBS, CNN and NYT are all DNC media complex outlets. They have the most retractons and incorrect stories in the last 3 years than any other media outlets.fubar said:I read/watch a variety, but NPR recently (lots of car time over the past few weeks). When at home watching, PBS and CNN mostly. In print (or online), New York Times.midgett said:fubar said:Watching Fox News equals research?Doc Holliday said:Millions have heard or looked into this. Fox News averages 2.4 million viewers and they talk about this every week.fubar said:
"Millions" of people have "researched" this? And you wonder why people don't take you seriously.
But by all means, let's prosecute people so that some Bubbas don't get angry and go shoot up the town.
You can see trends on #SPYGATE stats on twitter, Dan Bongino, Mark Levin, Jack Posobiec viewership. Well over 30 million hits on this story. The Q anon crazies alone make up over a million people.
You need to read better. I said IF they lay out the crimes...but they refuse charges, people are going to be very angry.
You researchers may be surprised at the report ... especially if Fox News is your primary source.
Fox News isn't my primary source but since you bring it up, who/what is your primary news source?
For the record, however, I didn't bring it up. Doc said that "millions" of people had "researched" this. When I challenged that assertion -- which is on its face preposterous -- he said that millions ... watch Fox News.
And also for the record, the report he and some others have been pimping, and waiting on with bated breath ... never mind. I don't want to spoil it for you.
Except to say that their usual backup plan is already in motion.
We were good before Trump. We'll be good after. You're one of those who make me proud we're both Baylor grads.midgett said:fubar said:I read/watch a variety, but NPR recently (lots of car time over the past few weeks). When at home watching, PBS and CNN mostly. In print (or online), New York Times.midgett said:fubar said:Watching Fox News equals research?Doc Holliday said:Millions have heard or looked into this. Fox News averages 2.4 million viewers and they talk about this every week.fubar said:
"Millions" of people have "researched" this? And you wonder why people don't take you seriously.
But by all means, let's prosecute people so that some Bubbas don't get angry and go shoot up the town.
You can see trends on #SPYGATE stats on twitter, Dan Bongino, Mark Levin, Jack Posobiec viewership. Well over 30 million hits on this story. The Q anon crazies alone make up over a million people.
You need to read better. I said IF they lay out the crimes...but they refuse charges, people are going to be very angry.
You researchers may be surprised at the report ... especially if Fox News is your primary source.
Fox News isn't my primary source but since you bring it up, who/what is your primary news source?
For the record, however, I didn't bring it up. Doc said that "millions" of people had "researched" this. When I challenged that assertion -- which is on its face preposterous -- he said that millions ... watch Fox News.
And also for the record, the report he and some others have been pimping, and waiting on with bated breath ... never mind. I don't want to spoil it for you.
Except to say that their usual backup plan is already in motion.
No doubt there are some who exaggerate on here. I missed "millions" have "researched." Ugh. We have several here on both sides that exaggerate too much.
Always love you, good brother, fubar. Just never knew you were naive to depend so much on biased sources when it comes to politics. :-)
Truth is, it's very difficult to find true political journalists without an agenda
fubar said:We were good before Trump. We'll be good after. You're one of those who make me proud we're both Baylor grads.midgett said:fubar said:I read/watch a variety, but NPR recently (lots of car time over the past few weeks). When at home watching, PBS and CNN mostly. In print (or online), New York Times.midgett said:fubar said:Watching Fox News equals research?Doc Holliday said:Millions have heard or looked into this. Fox News averages 2.4 million viewers and they talk about this every week.fubar said:
"Millions" of people have "researched" this? And you wonder why people don't take you seriously.
But by all means, let's prosecute people so that some Bubbas don't get angry and go shoot up the town.
You can see trends on #SPYGATE stats on twitter, Dan Bongino, Mark Levin, Jack Posobiec viewership. Well over 30 million hits on this story. The Q anon crazies alone make up over a million people.
You need to read better. I said IF they lay out the crimes...but they refuse charges, people are going to be very angry.
You researchers may be surprised at the report ... especially if Fox News is your primary source.
Fox News isn't my primary source but since you bring it up, who/what is your primary news source?
For the record, however, I didn't bring it up. Doc said that "millions" of people had "researched" this. When I challenged that assertion -- which is on its face preposterous -- he said that millions ... watch Fox News.
And also for the record, the report he and some others have been pimping, and waiting on with bated breath ... never mind. I don't want to spoil it for you.
Except to say that their usual backup plan is already in motion.
No doubt there are some who exaggerate on here. I missed "millions" have "researched." Ugh. We have several here on both sides that exaggerate too much.
Always love you, good brother, fubar. Just never knew you were naive to depend so much on biased sources when it comes to politics. :-)
Truth is, it's very difficult to find true political journalists without an agenda
My best to you and yours this Thanksgiving.
P.S. Trump still sucks.
I am not now, or have I ever, or will I ever in the future exaggerate in the ever so slightest bit.midgett said:fubar said:I read/watch a variety, but NPR recently (lots of car time over the past few weeks). When at home watching, PBS and CNN mostly. In print (or online), New York Times.midgett said:fubar said:Watching Fox News equals research?Doc Holliday said:Millions have heard or looked into this. Fox News averages 2.4 million viewers and they talk about this every week.fubar said:
"Millions" of people have "researched" this? And you wonder why people don't take you seriously.
But by all means, let's prosecute people so that some Bubbas don't get angry and go shoot up the town.
You can see trends on #SPYGATE stats on twitter, Dan Bongino, Mark Levin, Jack Posobiec viewership. Well over 30 million hits on this story. The Q anon crazies alone make up over a million people.
You need to read better. I said IF they lay out the crimes...but they refuse charges, people are going to be very angry.
You researchers may be surprised at the report ... especially if Fox News is your primary source.
Fox News isn't my primary source but since you bring it up, who/what is your primary news source?
For the record, however, I didn't bring it up. Doc said that "millions" of people had "researched" this. When I challenged that assertion -- which is on its face preposterous -- he said that millions ... watch Fox News.
And also for the record, the report he and some others have been pimping, and waiting on with bated breath ... never mind. I don't want to spoil it for you.
Except to say that their usual backup plan is already in motion.
No doubt there are some who exaggerate on here. I missed "millions" have "researched." Ugh. We have several here on both sides that exaggerate too much.
Always love you, good brother, fubar. Just never knew you were naive to depend so much on biased sources when it comes to politics. :-)
Truth is, it's very difficult to find true political journalists without an agenda