Coronavirus updates here

435,439 Views | 4582 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by Jacques Strap
Forest Bueller_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So as far as actual updates.

North Korea still at zero cases, right?
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Bearitto said:

riflebear said:




I swear I recall people here ridiculing Trump for suggesting this medicine was showing a lot of promise. Strange.
I recall people saying it was untimely given the lack of proper testing. Still seems to be effective only in mild cases.
Even if that is true, since the overwhelming majority of C19 cases are mild, early use of the drug would ease the number of cases and workload on medical staff.

I agree that more testing is needed, but in an emergency 'good but not completely tested' beats the hell out of 'wait until we have something perfect, even if the wait kills people'.
libs don't want a cure so the bodies can pile up before the election. Although it won't work, they think they can use the "lack of a cure" to hurt Trump come November
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Bearitto said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Bearitto said:

riflebear said:




I swear I recall people here ridiculing Trump for suggesting this medicine was showing a lot of promise. Strange.
I recall people saying it was untimely given the lack of proper testing. Still seems to be effective only in mild cases.
Even if that is true, since the overwhelming majority of C19 cases are mild, early use of the drug would ease the number of cases and workload on medical staff.

I agree that more testing is needed, but in an emergency 'good but not completely tested' beats the hell out of 'wait until we have something perfect, even if the wait kills people'.
Sure, all I was saying is that people here wanted larger trials first, not merely unsubstantiated hope.

Osodecentex, the argument as to side effects and toxicity is not the key element. Homeopathy has no side effects or toxicity. The danger is in passing up a valid treatment. At the moment there is no such therapeutic to pass up, so the trick is to see exactly how helpful and for whom. Also think the Right to Try law could come into play, just have to find a doctor willing to prescribe that drug.
There is evidence the drugs help, nothing so far that stands against it.

You are very good at rhetoric quash, not so much at consistency when you play at being 'libertarian'.
Sigh. There is nothing political about this particular issue.


The entirety of virus related topics has been politicized by leftists. You knew that.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/after-mocking-trump-promoting-hydroxychloroquine-media-acknowleges-might-treat-coronavirus
You forget that Trump dismissed the seriousness and downplayed the severity for 6 weeks, for political reasons.
Well, actually the Trump took it more seriously than the dems in congress who were ridiculing him for the travel ban and telling people to go out to eat in New York and go visit China Town.... really, it's okay - go to the parade too....

But I'm sure in your twisted thinking, that's Trump's fault too.... that the dems were more concerned with impeachment than a potential pandemic.

I swear, I hope you are not a real scientist, I have never in my life seen somebody so constantly ignore facts and variables.
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HashTag said:

TexasScientist said:

Bearitto said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Bearitto said:

riflebear said:




I swear I recall people here ridiculing Trump for suggesting this medicine was showing a lot of promise. Strange.
I recall people saying it was untimely given the lack of proper testing. Still seems to be effective only in mild cases.
Even if that is true, since the overwhelming majority of C19 cases are mild, early use of the drug would ease the number of cases and workload on medical staff.

I agree that more testing is needed, but in an emergency 'good but not completely tested' beats the hell out of 'wait until we have something perfect, even if the wait kills people'.
Sure, all I was saying is that people here wanted larger trials first, not merely unsubstantiated hope.

Osodecentex, the argument as to side effects and toxicity is not the key element. Homeopathy has no side effects or toxicity. The danger is in passing up a valid treatment. At the moment there is no such therapeutic to pass up, so the trick is to see exactly how helpful and for whom. Also think the Right to Try law could come into play, just have to find a doctor willing to prescribe that drug.
There is evidence the drugs help, nothing so far that stands against it.

You are very good at rhetoric quash, not so much at consistency when you play at being 'libertarian'.
Sigh. There is nothing political about this particular issue.


The entirety of virus related topics has been politicized by leftists. You knew that.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/after-mocking-trump-promoting-hydroxychloroquine-media-acknowleges-might-treat-coronavirus
You forget that Trump dismissed the seriousness and downplayed the severity for 6 weeks, for political reasons.
Well, actually the Trump took it more seriously than the dems in congress who were ridiculing him for the travel ban and telling people to go out to eat in New York and go visit China Town.... really, it's okay - go to the parade too....

But I'm sure in your twisted thinking, that's Trump's fault too.... that the dems were more concerned with impeachment than a potential pandemic.

I swear, I hope you are not a real scientist, I have never in my life seen somebody so constantly ignore facts and variables.
You don't know too much about science, or you wouldn't automatically assign or associate your ad hominem assumptions with me. Trying to deflect Trump's shortcomings onto the Democrats' shortcomings doesn't excuse him, and vice versa.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

HashTag said:

TexasScientist said:

Bearitto said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Bearitto said:

riflebear said:




I swear I recall people here ridiculing Trump for suggesting this medicine was showing a lot of promise. Strange.
I recall people saying it was untimely given the lack of proper testing. Still seems to be effective only in mild cases.
Even if that is true, since the overwhelming majority of C19 cases are mild, early use of the drug would ease the number of cases and workload on medical staff.

I agree that more testing is needed, but in an emergency 'good but not completely tested' beats the hell out of 'wait until we have something perfect, even if the wait kills people'.
Sure, all I was saying is that people here wanted larger trials first, not merely unsubstantiated hope.

Osodecentex, the argument as to side effects and toxicity is not the key element. Homeopathy has no side effects or toxicity. The danger is in passing up a valid treatment. At the moment there is no such therapeutic to pass up, so the trick is to see exactly how helpful and for whom. Also think the Right to Try law could come into play, just have to find a doctor willing to prescribe that drug.
There is evidence the drugs help, nothing so far that stands against it.

You are very good at rhetoric quash, not so much at consistency when you play at being 'libertarian'.
Sigh. There is nothing political about this particular issue.


The entirety of virus related topics has been politicized by leftists. You knew that.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/after-mocking-trump-promoting-hydroxychloroquine-media-acknowleges-might-treat-coronavirus
You forget that Trump dismissed the seriousness and downplayed the severity for 6 weeks, for political reasons.
Well, actually the Trump took it more seriously than the dems in congress who were ridiculing him for the travel ban and telling people to go out to eat in New York and go visit China Town.... really, it's okay - go to the parade too....

But I'm sure in your twisted thinking, that's Trump's fault too.... that the dems were more concerned with impeachment than a potential pandemic.

I swear, I hope you are not a real scientist, I have never in my life seen somebody so constantly ignore facts and variables.
You don't know too much about science, or you wouldn't automatically assign or associate your ad hominem assumptions with me. Trying to deflect Trump's shortcomings onto the Democrats' shortcomings doesn't excuse him, and vice versa.
One thing for sure.... it seems you continually ignore facts, variables and results if it takes you to a conclusion you don't want.

What you think is a deflection is merely a fact, pointed out to you, which you wish to ignore. But go ahead... keep seeing what you believe instead of the other way around.
riflebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This seems odd and very misleading

riflebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Excellent

Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
riflebear said:

This seems odd and very misleading




There's tons of people making tons of money over the fear mongering

Not even mentioning stimulus but with
$2,000,000,000,000 times 2 in stimulus .........

3:1,000,000 is the ratio of deaths to population in California and its entire economy is in full halt. Scandalous

Lies, lies and more lies = money, money and more money
riflebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
40,000 vs 2500? At least they were close - good job media. As usual they jump to conclusions to try and hurt Trump and shortly after the truth comes out and they have egg on their face - AGAIN.

quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bearitto said:

quash said:

Bearitto said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Bearitto said:

riflebear said:




I swear I recall people here ridiculing Trump for suggesting this medicine was showing a lot of promise. Strange.
I recall people saying it was untimely given the lack of proper testing. Still seems to be effective only in mild cases.
Even if that is true, since the overwhelming majority of C19 cases are mild, early use of the drug would ease the number of cases and workload on medical staff.

I agree that more testing is needed, but in an emergency 'good but not completely tested' beats the hell out of 'wait until we have something perfect, even if the wait kills people'.
Sure, all I was saying is that people here wanted larger trials first, not merely unsubstantiated hope.

Osodecentex, the argument as to side effects and toxicity is not the key element. Homeopathy has no side effects or toxicity. The danger is in passing up a valid treatment. At the moment there is no such therapeutic to pass up, so the trick is to see exactly how helpful and for whom. Also think the Right to Try law could come into play, just have to find a doctor willing to prescribe that drug.
There is evidence the drugs help, nothing so far that stands against it.

You are very good at rhetoric quash, not so much at consistency when you play at being 'libertarian'.
Sigh. There is nothing political about this particular issue.


The entirety of virus related topics has been politicized by leftists. You knew that.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/after-mocking-trump-promoting-hydroxychloroquine-media-acknowleges-might-treat-coronavirus
Yippee. What does that have to do with me?


Umm, in opposition to your statement, there is in fact something political about this particular issue

When you broaden it the way you did, sure. But that is on you.

Now: did you have something to say about my specific reply?
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
riflebear said:

40,000 vs 2500? At least they were close - good job media. As usual they jump to conclusions to try and hurt Trump and shortly after the truth comes out and they have egg on their face - AGAIN.


Stories develop with time. Are you really blaming the US media for reporting numbers supplied initially by the CCP?

The US did have an epidemiologist in China to help with acquiring this type of information, but that position was eliminated by this administration.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thank you, quash, for the obligatory response from the Democrats.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Forest Bueller_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
riflebear said:

This seems odd and very misleading


Ok, well those guidelines seem to assign much more death to Coronavirus than may actually be caused by Coronavirus.

Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If death can be attributed to coronavirus it will

Tons of stimulus money makes it happen

Greed baby!
Kyle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And keep in mind the CDC is lower than many of the other sites the fake news hysterics tout.

But you're spot on - never let a good crisis go to waste. Maximize damage to the president, maximize opportunities for social control, maximize our money sent to special interests fighting the Kung Flu.
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So the 7,087 known deaths in the U.S., and 58,787 deaths around to world, as of today, and the plummet in the world financial markets, are all the result of greed for stimulus money? I'd like to hear how you reconcile that belief with reality.
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Florda_mike said:

If death can be attributed to coronavirus it will

Tons of stimulus money makes it happen

Greed baby!


What in the world are you talking about ?
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canada2017 said:

Florda_mike said:

If death can be attributed to coronavirus it will

Tons of stimulus money makes it happen

Greed baby!


What in the world are you talking about ?
^^^^ Ditto. Maybe he just topped off happy hour. LOL
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canada2017 said:

Florda_mike said:

If death can be attributed to coronavirus it will

Tons of stimulus money makes it happen

Greed baby!


What in the world are you talking about ?


When this is over, you're going to find there were tons more lies told about the feared corona than truths

3 deaths per 1,000,000 people in California and the entire state is shut down? 250 dead in entire state! Gimme a break

Financial stimulus and political TDS greed will probably wipe us all out until November elections. Democrats win it'll all go away and if Trump wins it'll not stop

We all thought media was Fake News before this and now populace is taking it as gospel. Barnum had nothing on today's media

Ok, now belittle these contrary thoughts as you getcha stimulus. Everyone stand up for some Socialist stimulating stimulus
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

So the 7,087 known deaths in the U.S., and 58,787 deaths around to world, as of today, and the plummet in the world financial markets, are all the result of greed for stimulus money? I'd like to hear how you reconcile that belief with reality.


Ok I agree we should shut everything down over some deaths

7000 of 350,000,000? Seriously?

What do you think about the 1,000,000+ babies murdered per year from abortion? Should we stop work over abortion?

There's others! 9 deaths on Texas highways per day! That's as many deaths each month as California has. Should we stop driving?

25,000 have died from common flu! What would you do about that?

Doesn't matter, there's tons of money chasing these corona stats now so they'll be amplified for another stimulus package

And what about the only 3 governors to outlaw Hydroxychloroquine in their state. All 3 were democrats. Why? TDS and can't let him win again?

Ok, now say this boy is cra cra but I'll be right in the end

I've been scammed before, and so this one is easy to see
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canada2017 said:

Florda_mike said:

If death can be attributed to coronavirus it will

Tons of stimulus money makes it happen

Greed baby!


What in the world are you talking about ?
I think he's trying to say before this is all over, there will be massive fraud by people, hospitals, companies, polticians... follow the money.

Hospitals will be able to treat coronavirus patients that have no insurance and get reimbursed by the gov't. During this time when hospitals are losing revenue because they've cancelled elective procedures, I wouldn't be surprised if some (if not many) hospitals, care clincs, emergency centers will claim to be treating coronavirus victims (when they're not) all in the name of - for the pay from the federal gov't.

Just an example
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Updated virus progression

March 19: 4,530 new cases, 57 new deaths
March 20: 5,594 new cases, 49 new deaths
March 21: 4,824 new cases, 46 new deaths
March 22: 9,339 new cases. 117 new deaths
March 23: 10,168 new cases. 140 new deaths.
March 24: 11,089 new cases. 225 new deaths.
March 25: 13,355 new cases. 247 new deaths.
March 26: 17,224 new cases. 268 new deaths.
March 27: 18,691 new cases. 401 new deaths.
March 28: 19,452 new cases. 525 new deaths
March 29: 18,882 new cases. 264 new deaths
March 30: 20,353 new cases. 573 new deaths.
March 31: 24,742 new cases. 912 new deaths.
April 1: 26,473 new cases. 1049 new deaths.
April 2: 29,874 new cases. 968 new deaths.
April 3: 32,284 new cases. 1,321 new deaths.

Total cases (tested): 244,877
Total deaths: 6,070

Texas:
March 30: 2,906 cases. 41 deaths.
March 31: 3,666 cases. 56 deaths.
April 1: 4,068 cases. 60 deaths
April 2: 4,823 cases. 77 deaths
April 3: 5,658 cases. 97 deaths

New York:
March 30: 67,325 cases. 1,342 deaths.
March 31: 75,983 cases. 1,714 deaths.
April 1: 83,901 cases. 2,219 deaths. (505 today!)
April 2: 93,053 cases. 2,583 deaths.
April 3: 103,476 cases. 3,218 deaths. (680 today!)

New York is a **** show. They've been on their extreme measures for a couple of weeks and it's not showing any sign of slowing. 680 deaths and over half the fatalities for the day. A state a third of the population of Italy is going to pass Italy in cases. They've already passed France and Germany, and Spain and Italy are in their sites. New York/New Jersey made up over half of all new cases and just under 50% of all cases and over half of all deaths.
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HashTag said:

Canada2017 said:

Florda_mike said:

If death can be attributed to coronavirus it will

Tons of stimulus money makes it happen

Greed baby!


What in the world are you talking about ?
I think he's trying to say before this is all over, there will be massive fraud by people, hospitals, companies, polticians... follow the money.

Hospitals will be able to treat coronavirus patients that have no insurance and get reimbursed by the gov't. During this time when hospitals are losing revenue because they've cancelled elective procedures, I wouldn't be surprised if some (if not many) hospitals, care clincs, emergency centers will claim to be treating coronavirus victims (when they're not) all in the name of - for the pay from the federal gov't.

Just an example


And what will be the collateral damage?

Operations not addressed for fear of being in a potentially infected hospital

Foreclosures

Suicides

Divorce

Abuse of all kinds
Kyle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

So the 7,087 known deaths in the U.S., and 58,787 deaths around to world, as of today, and the plummet in the world financial markets, are all the result of greed for stimulus money? I'd like to hear how you reconcile that belief with reality.
Because you're a liberal arts major, no one pays attention to you.
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kyle said:

TexasScientist said:

So the 7,087 known deaths in the U.S., and 58,787 deaths around to world, as of today, and the plummet in the world financial markets, are all the result of greed for stimulus money? I'd like to hear how you reconcile that belief with reality.
Because you're a liberal arts major, no one pays attention to you.


Hell hes a scientist that has to agree with global warming and such or his job and grants go away

That's why he's disrespected
Bearitto
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Bearitto said:

quash said:

Bearitto said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Bearitto said:

riflebear said:




I swear I recall people here ridiculing Trump for suggesting this medicine was showing a lot of promise. Strange.
I recall people saying it was untimely given the lack of proper testing. Still seems to be effective only in mild cases.
Even if that is true, since the overwhelming majority of C19 cases are mild, early use of the drug would ease the number of cases and workload on medical staff.

I agree that more testing is needed, but in an emergency 'good but not completely tested' beats the hell out of 'wait until we have something perfect, even if the wait kills people'.
Sure, all I was saying is that people here wanted larger trials first, not merely unsubstantiated hope.

Osodecentex, the argument as to side effects and toxicity is not the key element. Homeopathy has no side effects or toxicity. The danger is in passing up a valid treatment. At the moment there is no such therapeutic to pass up, so the trick is to see exactly how helpful and for whom. Also think the Right to Try law could come into play, just have to find a doctor willing to prescribe that drug.
There is evidence the drugs help, nothing so far that stands against it.

You are very good at rhetoric quash, not so much at consistency when you play at being 'libertarian'.
Sigh. There is nothing political about this particular issue.


The entirety of virus related topics has been politicized by leftists. You knew that.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/after-mocking-trump-promoting-hydroxychloroquine-media-acknowleges-might-treat-coronavirus
Yippee. What does that have to do with me?


Umm, in opposition to your statement, there is in fact something political about this particular issue

When you broaden it the way you did, sure. But that is on you.

Now: did you have something to say about my specific reply?


Ha! I used specific text from your specific reply to respond to your specific reply. Specifically.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bearitto said:

quash said:

Bearitto said:

quash said:

Bearitto said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Oldbear83 said:

quash said:

Bearitto said:

riflebear said:




I swear I recall people here ridiculing Trump for suggesting this medicine was showing a lot of promise. Strange.
I recall people saying it was untimely given the lack of proper testing. Still seems to be effective only in mild cases.
Even if that is true, since the overwhelming majority of C19 cases are mild, early use of the drug would ease the number of cases and workload on medical staff.

I agree that more testing is needed, but in an emergency 'good but not completely tested' beats the hell out of 'wait until we have something perfect, even if the wait kills people'.
Sure, all I was saying is that people here wanted larger trials first, not merely unsubstantiated hope.

Osodecentex, the argument as to side effects and toxicity is not the key element. Homeopathy has no side effects or toxicity. The danger is in passing up a valid treatment. At the moment there is no such therapeutic to pass up, so the trick is to see exactly how helpful and for whom. Also think the Right to Try law could come into play, just have to find a doctor willing to prescribe that drug.
There is evidence the drugs help, nothing so far that stands against it.

You are very good at rhetoric quash, not so much at consistency when you play at being 'libertarian'.
Sigh. There is nothing political about this particular issue.


The entirety of virus related topics has been politicized by leftists. You knew that.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/after-mocking-trump-promoting-hydroxychloroquine-media-acknowleges-might-treat-coronavirus
Yippee. What does that have to do with me?


Umm, in opposition to your statement, there is in fact something political about this particular issue

When you broaden it the way you did, sure. But that is on you.

Now: did you have something to say about my specific reply?


Ha! I used specific text from your specific reply to respond to your specific reply. Specifically.
Quash gets more vague when he feels like he is losing.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
BearTruth13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Florda_mike said:

TexasScientist said:

So the 7,087 known deaths in the U.S., and 58,787 deaths around to world, as of today, and the plummet in the world financial markets, are all the result of greed for stimulus money? I'd like to hear how you reconcile that belief with reality.


Ok I agree we should shut everything down over some deaths

7000 of 350,000,000? Seriously?

What do you think about the 1,000,000+ babies murdered per year from abortion? Should we stop work over abortion?

There's others! 9 deaths on Texas highways per day! That's as many deaths each month as California has. Should we stop driving?

25,000 have died from common flu! What would you do about that?

Doesn't matter, there's tons of money chasing these corona stats now so they'll be amplified for another stimulus package

And what about the only 3 governors to outlaw Hydroxychloroquine in their state. All 3 were democrats. Why? TDS and can't let him win again?

Ok, now say this boy is cra cra but I'll be right in the end

I've been scammed before, and so this one is easy to see


Dude this is getting tired.

We have been social distancing for weeks now. And COVID 19 killed 1,300 Americans today. That makes it the 3rd most likely cause of death in the country right now (barely behind cancer and heart disease). It will likely pass those in the next few days.

Can you imagine how bad it would be without the measures we are taking right now?

The more cases in short order, the more overwhelmed hospitals become. That is why the Italian, French and Spanish death rates are climbing over 10%. Why our death rate has jumped from 1.2% last week to 2.6% now.
Buddha Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Florda_mike said:

TexasScientist said:

So the 7,087 known deaths in the U.S., and 58,787 deaths around to world, as of today, and the plummet in the world financial markets, are all the result of greed for stimulus money? I'd like to hear how you reconcile that belief with reality.


Ok I agree we should shut everything down over some deaths

7000 of 350,000,000? Seriously?

What do you think about the 1,000,000+ babies murdered per year from abortion? Should we stop work over abortion?

There's others! 9 deaths on Texas highways per day! That's as many deaths each month as California has. Should we stop driving?

25,000 have died from common flu! What would you do about that?

Doesn't matter, there's tons of money chasing these corona stats now so they'll be amplified for another stimulus package

And what about the only 3 governors to outlaw Hydroxychloroquine in their state. All 3 were democrats. Why? TDS and can't let him win again?

Ok, now say this boy is cra cra but I'll be right in the end

I've been scammed before, and so this one is easy to see
You've been wrong every step of the way so far. I don't see that changing anytime soon. You're becoming the Alex Jones of this site.
BaylorTaxman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Baylor WBB player Moon Ursin posted video Friday mourning the loss of her grandmother to CV-19.

A month ago she thought she would be playing in the Final Four this weekend. What a tragic four weeks this has been, for many reasons.
LTbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Buddha Bear said:

Florda_mike said:

TexasScientist said:

So the 7,087 known deaths in the U.S., and 58,787 deaths around to world, as of today, and the plummet in the world financial markets, are all the result of greed for stimulus money? I'd like to hear how you reconcile that belief with reality.


Ok I agree we should shut everything down over some deaths

7000 of 350,000,000? Seriously?

What do you think about the 1,000,000+ babies murdered per year from abortion? Should we stop work over abortion?

There's others! 9 deaths on Texas highways per day! That's as many deaths each month as California has. Should we stop driving?

25,000 have died from common flu! What would you do about that?

Doesn't matter, there's tons of money chasing these corona stats now so they'll be amplified for another stimulus package

And what about the only 3 governors to outlaw Hydroxychloroquine in their state. All 3 were democrats. Why? TDS and can't let him win again?

Ok, now say this boy is cra cra but I'll be right in the end

I've been scammed before, and so this one is easy to see
You've been wrong every step of the way so far. I don't see that changing anytime soon. You're becoming the Alex Jones of this site.


Mikey isn't worth engaging with. He's likely just a troll. At first you think he's just stupid, then you slowly start to realize there's no way he's actually this stupid, this naive, and this cemented in said stupidity.
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Florda_mike said:

TexasScientist said:

So the 7,087 known deaths in the U.S., and 58,787 deaths around to world, as of today, and the plummet in the world financial markets, are all the result of greed for stimulus money? I'd like to hear how you reconcile that belief with reality.


Ok I agree we should shut everything down over some deaths

7000 of 350,000,000? Seriously?

What do you think about the 1,000,000+ babies murdered per year from abortion? Should we stop work over abortion?

There's others! 9 deaths on Texas highways per day! That's as many deaths each month as California has. Should we stop driving?

25,000 have died from common flu! What would you do about that?

Doesn't matter, there's tons of money chasing these corona stats now so they'll be amplified for another stimulus package

And what about the only 3 governors to outlaw Hydroxychloroquine in their state. All 3 were democrats. Why? TDS and can't let him win again?

Ok, now say this boy is cra cra but I'll be right in the end

I've been scammed before, and so this one is easy to see
The difference is, unchecked, this virus has the potential to produce death rates comperable to or greater than the Spanish Flu. None of the deaths rates from pathogens or accidents you cite above approach the potential death rate of this virus.

Influenza has vaccines and therapeutics to minimize it, so the comparison is not valid.
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kyle said:

TexasScientist said:

So the 7,087 known deaths in the U.S., and 58,787 deaths around to world, as of today, and the plummet in the world financial markets, are all the result of greed for stimulus money? I'd like to hear how you reconcile that belief with reality.
Because you're a liberal arts major, no one pays attention to you.
You can't. That's what I thought. I'm as much of a liberal arts major as you are an Aggie mathmatics major.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

So the 7,087 known deaths in the U.S., and 58,787 deaths around to world, as of today, and the plummet in the world financial markets, are all the result of greed for stimulus money? I'd like to hear how you reconcile that belief with reality.
He uses science
PartyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LTbear said:

Buddha Bear said:

Florda_mike said:

TexasScientist said:

So the 7,087 known deaths in the U.S., and 58,787 deaths around to world, as of today, and the plummet in the world financial markets, are all the result of greed for stimulus money? I'd like to hear how you reconcile that belief with reality.


Ok I agree we should shut everything down over some deaths

7000 of 350,000,000? Seriously?

What do you think about the 1,000,000+ babies murdered per year from abortion? Should we stop work over abortion?

There's others! 9 deaths on Texas highways per day! That's as many deaths each month as California has. Should we stop driving?

25,000 have died from common flu! What would you do about that?

Doesn't matter, there's tons of money chasing these corona stats now so they'll be amplified for another stimulus package

And what about the only 3 governors to outlaw Hydroxychloroquine in their state. All 3 were democrats. Why? TDS and can't let him win again?

Ok, now say this boy is cra cra but I'll be right in the end

I've been scammed before, and so this one is easy to see
You've been wrong every step of the way so far. I don't see that changing anytime soon. You're becoming the Alex Jones of this site.


Mikey isn't worth engaging with. He's likely just a troll. At first you think he's just stupid, then you slowly start to realize there's no way he's actually this stupid, this naive, and this cemented in said stupidity.


Agree same deal with Bearritto.
First Page Last Page
Page 39 of 131
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.