Bearitto said:
Porteroso said:
Your argument against saving lives is..... Suicide. Well done, well done. You've convinced all of us. If it turns out that people willingly ending their lives might increase from the rate of 10 per 100k to 18 per 100k, we shouldn't take precautionary measures against a virus, which, let's go straight to worst case scenario like you did, will kill 2 million Americans.
Ok.
That was one aspect of the argument. I'm not surprised you don't understand all of it and just focused on the pictures. There were a lot of big words there.
See, that's interesting, that you think you made an intelligent argument that people who disagree with your argument must not be able to understand.
I can at least understand the economic hit we are all taking. Most of my work revolves around large group gatherings, and has been canceled. What you fail to realize, is that life is more important than money. You want us to keep the big boom going, and who cares about the people 50+ who will die because 20 year olds with little risk carry it through negligence.
I wonder what the Founding Fathers would say about opinions like yours, that throw the old away, for the economic fruits of the young? Maybe "they'll die anyways, why indulge them in their last hope for immortality?" Yes, I can see Madison writing that now...