ScrappyPaws said:I see it (bowl eligibility) as a minimum performance level considering where we've been. It would show we've potentially turned a corner. It also contributes some tangible benefits to reinforcing that momentum with bowl eligible teams allowed an additional 4-5 weeks of organized team practices and the payout that comes with bowl participation, win or lose. Ask any college coach if an extra month of practice and an extra $6 or 8 million (Cheez-It Bowl is 6/team, Alamo Bowl is 8/team) is beneficial in maintaining and building on momentum.Daveisabovereproach said:
I say this in every thread where expectations are talked about, but I don't see what it is about six wins that gets so many people fired up. Simply making it to a participation trophy bowl? Six wins should be the bare bare minimum for a program like ours considering what we have achieved and where we have been in the last 10 years
Yeah that's the thing, its significance is mostly symbolic at this point besides the extra practices which are obviously a tangible benefit. Something like 64% of FBS teams went to bowl games as of a few years ago. I just don't think it's the mark of a successful program. Only really bad teams worry about getting bowl eligible. It was what everyone was talking about during my freshman year circa 2010 when we hadn't been to a bowl in years and years. But to go from a conference championship and sugar bowl to this in a span of 3 years? Not good