Initial CFP bracket of 2024

36,661 Views | 629 Replies | Last: 23 min ago by boognish_bear
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GoldenBear007
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I would almost propose the P4 conferences all move back to divisions. Winner of each division is guaranteed a playoff spot. Top Group of 5 champion gets in. Three at large, but a conference can only get one at large bid.

If you can only finish as fourth highest ranked team in your conference (looking at you Alabama), you have no business being in the playoff.

Big 10 and SEC would obviously hate this idea, but that's the point.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




I hate these bcs comparisons they do. The BCS was biased against certain teams and computer programs can be written to include bias.

Until there is a committee or computer program that has a written, clear list of criteria that looks at all the variables other than school name or conference it will always be biased.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




B12 is screwed. We will be lucky to get one in with the SEC/B10 full press. Next we will be hearing Michigan really deserves to be in more than the B12 champ.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



With current rankings, Bama is in and the other SEC teams are outside looking in. No 3 loss team should be ranked above 16 or 17. None of them have a good enough record. And certainly none should be above a 10 win team with better records such as the non-P2 teams currently ranked below them.

The "playoffs" will always be the ESPN Blue Blood Invitationals as long as the corrupt & incompetent committee decides who gets in.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OU did not help us out here

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's only a 12 team playoff. It should be 16 but it's not.
BaylorGrad09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

It's only a 12 team playoff. It should be 16 but it's not.


Since the playoff started, only 15 teams have qualified (lots of repeats over the years). Boise will be #16 with a first time playoff berth this year, assuming they win.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ahh! That makes sense. Thanks for the clarification. It all depends on how one looks at it.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pretty accurate analogy of what's going on in Grapevine

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Confirming what we already know… This whole protracted process is about money and ratings

GoldenBear007
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's incredibly stupid to have current ADs on playoff committee, especially given the financial incentive for each conference based on how many teams make playoff.

Also ESPN must be truly calling all the shots because I'm honestly shocked big 12 and ACC keep getting slighted despite having just as much representation as SEC and Big 10 on the committee.

Is Mack staying silent during these committee meetings?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He's probably outvoted by P2 people & ESPN flunkies.
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

Confirming what we already know… This whole protracted process is about money and ratings




Anyone who follows football should know this is true. ESPN for years has done an entire show about the "reveal" of the playoff rankings and then an hour of breaking it down (defending the SEC rankings) and trying to discuss how the bracket would go
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe the idiot committee (really the people at ESPN) will favor anyone over the Big 12 and those teams are conveniently available. It doesn't matter what lame excuses they use. They change their criteria all the time and certainly don't apply them equally. For example, Alabama has no reason to be anywhere near the playoffs. They have not earned it and there are other teams that have earned it ranked lower. This has been the Obama from the beginning in 2014.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I could see Penn State beating Oregon tonight.

Has anyone seen SMU play this year? Are they as good as their record?
BaylorGrad09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
For some reason, despite the Big12 clearly having bigger brands and much better football top to bottom, the committee wants to slap down the conference to be equal to the MWC. The ACC still has major markets up and down the east coast that the Big12 doesn't have so it's elevated above simply because they can bring better tv markets.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

I could see Penn State beating Oregon tonight.

Has anyone seen SMU play this year? Are they as good as their record?

SMU is literally one leap from being out of the CFP discussion...amazing play

bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BaylorGrad09 said:

For some reason, despite the Big12 clearly having bigger brands and much better football top to bottom, the committee wants to slap down the conference to be equal to the MWC. The ACC still has major markets up and down the east coast that the Big12 doesn't have so it's elevated above simply because they can bring better tv markets.
People need to stop viewing Boise's ranking as respect for the Mountain West.

No one thinks the Mountain West is good. They think Boise State is good. And there are several data points supporting that opinion.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

I could see Penn State beating Oregon tonight.

Has anyone seen SMU play this year? Are they as good as their record?


I think like several B12 teams SMU is a good team...but probably not elite.

But....Clemson is also not anything special this year. Clemson has 3 losses and their only win over a team with a winning record was a 4 point win over 7-5 Pitt.

I think SMU will win tonight. Clemson isn't what they used to be....but a win over a name brand #17 will look good.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Probably doesn't matter a lot to the panel what a coach says...but he probably could have made a better point than that

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whitetrash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




I didn't watch all of the Big12 game. Did Tessitore still
Claim that 2-10 Mississippi State would win the Big 12?
Bearsalwayswin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
i've never wanted the sec to burn so much
BaylorGrad09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bearsalwayswin said:

i've never wanted the sec to burn so much


Won't happen but hoping they have a poor showing in the playoffs.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.