Keyser Soze said:
ColomboLQ said:
Keyser Soze said:
MaduroUTMB said:
Bethany McCraw and David Murdock are still running Judicial Affairs. After Dim Joak's retirement in 2014, Wigtil oversaw a real on-point department, shushing up rape victims just like 'ole Jim taught him.
I'm still cheering for the victim/plaintiffs on this one. There are a lot of skeletons hiding in Baylor's closet.
By all accounts they have run JA fairly well. Their shortcomings were the brief time they also wore the Title IX hat. They really had zero training or experience in Title IX and should have never held the position. That hat was removed from them with the hiring of Patty Crawford in 2014. There have never been reports of evil / poor character or any good reason to remove them since Title IX was removed. Doak is the worst of the worst and few deserve direct comparison.
They are predominately mention by the pro CAB crowd trying to stir the pot. You appear to be a sock trying just that.
"For example, Baylor refuses to take any action against Reagan Ramsower, Martha Lou Scott, Bethany McCraw and David Murdock, despite black and white documents showing they buried at least two sexual assault reports against Tevin Elliott prior to his assaulting two more students. Why has Baylor discharged (and paid) some officials for "misconduct," yet kept these individuals in high command?"
Uhm No.
The narrative of the the guy suing Baylor is not fact. Your wording is misleading.
You are trying to go from TE (not charged) being a suspect in cases against non-Baylor students to Baylor staff hiding two assaults - a major reach. There were never complaints made to Baylor. The one involving the MCC student had misdemeanor charge filed about a month after the event and there was an investigation opened in short order after that charge was filed. The AD department was copied when the investigation was opened.
What guy is suing Baylor? I find it incredibly ironic that you, of all people on this site, should complain about someone's wording being misleading, considering that is all you do on this site.
Besides, they aren't my words, they come from here:
http://media.graytvinc.com/documents/Plaintiffs+amended+motion+09.14.18+Phil+Stewart+deposition+excerpts.pdfAnd maybe I'm just misremembering (I'm not) but I'm fairly certain there were specific emails exchanged between certain Baylor administrators (as named above) about Elliot and what he was doing MONTHS before athletics was ever involved. Oh and there's this:
"I mean, I felt that the presentation was orchestrated, staged to achieve desired results. To take certain actions with respect to the actions that were ultimately taken roughly two weeks later on May the 26th" (in reference to the discharge of Briles, the demotion of Starr, and the demotion of McCaw). Later he said "I am concerned that there was an effort to protect certain members of the administration. Throughout the course of my tenure as a Regent of Baylor, I was always very concerned and quite interested in this -- the role played by Reagan Ramsower in the affairs of the University. Mr. Ramsower, in his role as the chief financial officer of the University, wielded extreme power and authority over the University at various levels. Reagan Ramsower, in his position as executive vice president, had a number of areas report to him, including our Title IX officer as well as the Baylor Police Department. I had significant concerns about the role of Reagan Ramsower at Baylor, and continue to this day.
- Baylor REGENT Phil Stewart