Another positive Stanford had going for it was the value of a degree.When I was faculty representative both Knoll and Mulkey told me that Stanford had that advantage when recruiting some elite athletes who wanted to go to a higher academic ranking school.Stanford still has the degree but not Tara.And,NIL $ probably trumps all for many recruits as well.blackie said:And then you have ND over Stanford 96-47.BUVA said:
#19 Tenn beats #5 UConn 80-76...first win vs Geno since 2007. Pat is smiling!
Stanford is living proof of what happens when you lose an elite coach (there are only 3 left now in WBB) and what happens to the program immediately after. Stanford is 3-8 in the ACC and 11-11 overall. They won't make the tournament. With all their history and knowing the change was coming, it didn't matter.
For those that want to continually diss our program and staff can you not see that we have landed on our feet darn well and have not suffered the pronounced and immediate drop-off that occurred with every other school who lost their elite coach...and those schools knew they were losing the coach well ahead of time. Some of those schools have taken years and years to get back to even being close to where they were. Some are still in the ditch.
You just don't lose an elite coach and not feel the effect. I am thankful that all we have seen was a speed bump and not an abyss. Our key players stayed and didn't desert and kept us afloat long enough to allow us to start the rebuild, which I for one am enjoying to watch and with a staff that is of an age that hopefully we don't have to start over again until well down the road. That change was always coming because of KM's age, it just came sooner than we expected or wanted.