4th and Inches said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Cobretti said:

---

Juror speaks to some media after Sussmann verdict
“I don’t think it should have been prosecuted,” she said of the case. “There are bigger things that affect the nation than a possible lie to the FBI.”

— Jeff Mordock (@JeffMordock) May 31, 2022

---

It doesn't seem like it is really a trial juror's job to decide whether something "should have been prosecuted."

---

Actually, it IS their job. The case was so without merit, it was a waste of their time.

Y'all were so POSITIVE this would prove you were right. It got laughed out of court after wasting $4million dollars a.

---

jury nullification doesnt equal not guilty..

---

You have this same energy about the 30+ Trump admin indictments from the mueller report?

Dunham has come up with pretty much exactly nothing so far.

One might even call it a fail:

C. Jordan said:

---

Dunham has come up with pretty much exactly nothing so far.

One might even call it a fail:

---

about the same as Mueller but spent less..

C. Jordan said:

---

Dunham has come up with pretty much exactly nothing so far.

One might even call it a fail:

---

While you are not far off from the truth on this, usually your logic is more like

in order for you to remain pro-dem.
I enjoy your entertainment value.

Of course, even the boy who cried "wolf" was right once.

Odd no Mention of the latest Clinton suicide. Shotgun to the chest and then hung himself with extension cord.

Yep. So any more about the Durham investigation?

Mark Twain was right when he said "it's easier to con a man than to make him see he's been conned."

Trump knew this was all a lie and y'all fell for it.

Doc Holliday said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Yep. So any more about the Durham investigation?

Mark Twain was right when he said "it's easier to con a man than to make him see he's been conned."

Trump knew this was all a lie and y'all fell for it.

---

Durham exposed that three documents used to justify spying and investigating Trump were all sourced to HRC. That's a stone cold fact.

---

NO, it literally isn't.

After YEARS of searching for a smoking gun, the best Durham could find was that Sussman, a lawyer who had multiple clients including a cyber security expert and HRC, passed documents on to the FBI -which were suspect, supposedly lied to the FBI.

that's it?

Notice that no one is calling the evidence false, and that Trump wasn't injured at all (he won the election and hasn't shut the **** up about this since). The court literally saw all the evidence and declined to find anyone guilty after looking at it for about 5 minutes.

You aren't making the argument you think you're making. At some point you have to begin to wonder if you've been had, man. It's okay. A lot of people lost their minds in support of Trump. A lot of people are searching for meaning in bull**** made up conspiracy theories because they want to believe they're special.

You should be more skeptical.

Married A Horn said:

---

Wasn't injured at all? What planet do u live on? He spent his entire presidency fighting this crap.

Absolutely proven she was the root and it was all fake. Jury said they shouldnt worry about it though and move on. Justice is gone from this country - only those in the right will get prosecuted.

Hunter, Hillary, and gang...good to go.

---

what are you even talking about? no, it literally didn't.

And "he spent his entire presidency fighting this crap?" Are you kidding? Trump is so effing weak that he fought a completely made-up story?

The hero of the Republican Party is so freaking bad at his job that he couldn't overcome something like that? And you want him to lead you still?

Trump literally set up a fake legal defense fund and raised a quarter of a billion dollars -never spent a dime on legal defense- and yet you're worried about THIS? give me a break. he wants people like you to be mad about the little things like this so that you don't notice he's fleecing you blind.

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

Wasn't injured at all? What planet do u live on? He spent his entire presidency fighting this crap.

Absolutely proven she was the root and it was all fake. Jury said they shouldnt worry about it though and move on. Justice is gone from this country - only those in the right will get prosecuted.

Hunter, Hillary, and gang...good to go.

---

what are you even talking about? no, it literally didn't.

And "he spent his entire presidency fighting this crap?" Are you kidding? Trump is so effing weak that he fought a completely made-up story?

The hero of the Republican Party is so freaking bad at his job that he couldn't overcome something like that? And you want him to lead you still?

Trump literally set up a fake legal defense fund and raised a quarter of a billion dollars -never spent a dime on legal defense- and yet you're worried about THIS? give me a break. he wants people like you to be mad about the little things like this so that you don't notice he's fleecing you blind.

---

Your heros are criminal masterminds. Go groom a kid or shoot em up with an $8000 shot that will do nothing but harm em.

whiterock said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Yep. So any more about the Durham investigation?

Mark Twain was right when he said "it's easier to con a man than to make him see he's been conned."

Trump knew this was all a lie and y'all fell for it.

---

Durham exposed that three documents used to justify spying and investigating Trump were all sourced to HRC. That's a stone cold fact.

---

NO, it literally isn't.

After YEARS of searching for a smoking gun, the best Durham could find was that Sussman, a lawyer who had multiple clients including a cyber security expert and HRC, passed documents on to the FBI -which were suspect, supposedly lied to the FBI.

that's it?

Notice that no one is calling the evidence false, and that Trump wasn't injured at all (he won the election and hasn't shut the **** up about this since). The court literally saw all the evidence and declined to find anyone guilty after looking at it for about 5 minutes.

You aren't making the argument you think you're making. At some point you have to begin to wonder if you've been had, man. It's okay. A lot of people lost their minds in support of Trump. A lot of people are searching for meaning in bull**** made up conspiracy theories because they want to believe they're special.

You should be more skeptical.

---

You are spectacularly poorly informed. Everyone knows the evidence was false. Even NYT has admitted it.

That's what makes the whole thing so outrageous. FBI knew it was nonsense. But they investigated it anyway, because they were afraid to tell team Clinton to go pound sand. because they thought she was going to win and they didn't want to miss a promotion.

---

Yes yes. The Clinton's are just SO powerful and corrupt. Masterminds. And yet they're unable to rig an election and get away with it. Or beat some ****bird racist ****wad.

I guess they're all too busy grooming children?

You are all addled beyond belief. You will believe absolutely anything that keeps you from admitting you've been had.

BrooksBearLives said:

---

whiterock said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Yep. So any more about the Durham investigation?

Mark Twain was right when he said "it's easier to con a man than to make him see he's been conned."

Trump knew this was all a lie and y'all fell for it.

---

Durham exposed that three documents used to justify spying and investigating Trump were all sourced to HRC. That's a stone cold fact.

---

NO, it literally isn't.

After YEARS of searching for a smoking gun, the best Durham could find was that Sussman, a lawyer who had multiple clients including a cyber security expert and HRC, passed documents on to the FBI -which were suspect, supposedly lied to the FBI.

that's it?

Notice that no one is calling the evidence false, and that Trump wasn't injured at all (he won the election and hasn't shut the **** up about this since). The court literally saw all the evidence and declined to find anyone guilty after looking at it for about 5 minutes.

You aren't making the argument you think you're making. At some point you have to begin to wonder if you've been had, man. It's okay. A lot of people lost their minds in support of Trump. A lot of people are searching for meaning in bull**** made up conspiracy theories because they want to believe they're special.

You should be more skeptical.

---

You are spectacularly poorly informed. Everyone knows the evidence was false. Even NYT has admitted it.

That's what makes the whole thing so outrageous. FBI knew it was nonsense. But they investigated it anyway, because they were afraid to tell team Clinton to go pound sand. because they thought she was going to win and they didn't want to miss a promotion.

---

Yes yes. The Clinton's are just SO powerful and corrupt. Masterminds. And yet they're unable to rig an election and get away with it. Or beat some ****bird racist ****wad.

I guess they're all too busy grooming children?

You are all addled beyond belief. You will believe absolutely anything that keeps you from admitting you've been had.

---

Your trust in hunter biden, china, poopy pants joe and politicians in general is hilarious

BrooksBearLives said:

---

whiterock said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Yep. So any more about the Durham investigation?

Mark Twain was right when he said "it's easier to con a man than to make him see he's been conned."

Trump knew this was all a lie and y'all fell for it.

---

Durham exposed that three documents used to justify spying and investigating Trump were all sourced to HRC. That's a stone cold fact.

---

NO, it literally isn't.

After YEARS of searching for a smoking gun, the best Durham could find was that Sussman, a lawyer who had multiple clients including a cyber security expert and HRC, passed documents on to the FBI -which were suspect, supposedly lied to the FBI.

that's it?

Notice that no one is calling the evidence false, and that Trump wasn't injured at all (he won the election and hasn't shut the **** up about this since). The court literally saw all the evidence and declined to find anyone guilty after looking at it for about 5 minutes.

You aren't making the argument you think you're making. At some point you have to begin to wonder if you've been had, man. It's okay. A lot of people lost their minds in support of Trump. A lot of people are searching for meaning in bull**** made up conspiracy theories because they want to believe they're special.

You should be more skeptical.

---

You are spectacularly poorly informed. Everyone knows the evidence was false. Even NYT has admitted it.

That's what makes the whole thing so outrageous. FBI knew it was nonsense. But they investigated it anyway, because they were afraid to tell team Clinton to go pound sand. because they thought she was going to win and they didn't want to miss a promotion.

---

Yes yes. The Clinton's are just SO powerful and corrupt. Masterminds. And yet they're unable to rig an election and get away with it. Or beat some ****bird racist ****wad.

I guess they're all too busy grooming children?

You are all addled beyond belief. You will believe absolutely anything that keeps you from admitting you've been had.

---

I'll agree with you that Hillary and the FBI suckers weren't very bright in their attempt to contest an election.

BrooksBearLives said:

---

whiterock said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Yep. So any more about the Durham investigation?

Mark Twain was right when he said "it's easier to con a man than to make him see he's been conned."

Trump knew this was all a lie and y'all fell for it.

---

Durham exposed that three documents used to justify spying and investigating Trump were all sourced to HRC. That's a stone cold fact.

---

NO, it literally isn't.

After YEARS of searching for a smoking gun, the best Durham could find was that Sussman, a lawyer who had multiple clients including a cyber security expert and HRC, passed documents on to the FBI -which were suspect, supposedly lied to the FBI.

that's it?

Notice that no one is calling the evidence false, and that Trump wasn't injured at all (he won the election and hasn't shut the **** up about this since). The court literally saw all the evidence and declined to find anyone guilty after looking at it for about 5 minutes.

You aren't making the argument you think you're making. At some point you have to begin to wonder if you've been had, man. It's okay. A lot of people lost their minds in support of Trump. A lot of people are searching for meaning in bull**** made up conspiracy theories because they want to believe they're special.

You should be more skeptical.

---

You are spectacularly poorly informed. Everyone knows the evidence was false. Even NYT has admitted it.

That's what makes the whole thing so outrageous. FBI knew it was nonsense. But they investigated it anyway, because they were afraid to tell team Clinton to go pound sand. because they thought she was going to win and they didn't want to miss a promotion.

---

Yes yes. The Clinton's are just SO powerful and corrupt. Masterminds. And yet they're unable to rig an election and get away with it. Or beat some ****bird racist ****wad.

---

did clinton run against Biden?

New Durham filing is pretty good for Durham and pretty bad for Danchenko. Among other things, it explains why Danchenko lied about Millian call. He had lied to Steele and needed to keep the lie alive (exactly what we've been saying for the past few years). https://t.co/K4KzmFVkIN pic.twitter.com/lNO28adwVC

— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) September 13, 2022

Special Counsel John Durham just disclosed that Igor Danchenko not only worked with Christopher Steele to develop the Russian collusion claims for the Clinton campaign but he later was a paid informant for the FBI. https://t.co/5tb8aRxaj6

— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) September 13, 2022

...The filing says that the FBI during that period was trying "to determine the truth or falsity of specific information in the Steele Reports." Yet, it was paying one of the key figures who worked for Steele (who in turn ultimately worked for the Clinton campaign).

— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) September 13, 2022

READ IT: FBI’s Brutal Draft Letter Firing Disgraced Agent Peter Strzok Revealed https://t.co/24NWMFhmBo

— Daily Wire News (@DailyWireNews) October 1, 2022

Strzok's dismissal letter was published today:

"In my 23 years in the FBI, I have not seen a more impactful series of missteps that has called into question the entire organization and more thoroughly damaged the FBI’s reputation."

h/t @walkafyre pic.twitter.com/rFILnxDL84

— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) September 30, 2022

Y'all… constantly citing twitter accounts and YouTube videos as proof of anything is just…. Cliche at this point.

Sad.

The second you say any of this stuff out loud you have to realize you sound like you are stupid. The only way any of these conspiracies are possible is if you believe the same political party that was too incompetent to cheat to win a presidential election, is so competent that dozens of investigations result in absolutely nothing.

And trained professional investigators can't find anything, but anonymous people on the internet? They need YOU, someone who barely passed high school chemistry, to help solve the case!

Perfect. Well done.

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Y'all… constantly citing twitter accounts and YouTube videos as proof of anything is just…. Cliche at this point.

Sad.

The second you say any of this stuff out loud you have to realize you sound like you are stupid. The only way any of these conspiracies are possible is if you believe the same political party that was too incompetent to cheat to win a presidential election, is so competent that dozens of investigations result in absolutely nothing.

And trained professional investigators can't find anything, but anonymous people on the internet? They need YOU, someone who barely passed high school chemistry, to help solve the case!

Perfect. Well done.

---

Trained investigators found out the FBI lied their ass off and gave us the source documentation to prove it…

You just didn't read it.

Good thread. Aged well.

fubar said:

---

Good thread. Aged well.

---

Durham is a Deep State Swamp Creature just like his old boss, Bill Barr. They are gonna take care of their own. Not sure why anybody is surprised at this point.

Married A Horn said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

whiterock said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Yep. So any more about the Durham investigation?

Mark Twain was right when he said "it's easier to con a man than to make him see he's been conned."

Trump knew this was all a lie and y'all fell for it.

---

Durham exposed that three documents used to justify spying and investigating Trump were all sourced to HRC. That's a stone cold fact.

---

NO, it literally isn't.

After YEARS of searching for a smoking gun, the best Durham could find was that Sussman, a lawyer who had multiple clients including a cyber security expert and HRC, passed documents on to the FBI -which were suspect, supposedly lied to the FBI.

that's it?

Notice that no one is calling the evidence false, and that Trump wasn't injured at all (he won the election and hasn't shut the **** up about this since). The court literally saw all the evidence and declined to find anyone guilty after looking at it for about 5 minutes.

You aren't making the argument you think you're making. At some point you have to begin to wonder if you've been had, man. It's okay. A lot of people lost their minds in support of Trump. A lot of people are searching for meaning in bull**** made up conspiracy theories because they want to believe they're special.

You should be more skeptical.

---

You are spectacularly poorly informed. Everyone knows the evidence was false. Even NYT has admitted it.

That's what makes the whole thing so outrageous. FBI knew it was nonsense. But they investigated it anyway, because they were afraid to tell team Clinton to go pound sand. because they thought she was going to win and they didn't want to miss a promotion.

---

Yes yes. The Clinton's are just SO powerful and corrupt. Masterminds. And yet they're unable to rig an election and get away with it. Or beat some ****bird racist ****wad.

I guess they're all too busy grooming children?

You are all addled beyond belief. You will believe absolutely anything that keeps you from admitting you've been had.

---

Your trust in hunter biden, china, poopy pants joe and politicians in general is hilarious

---

You zealots are all the same. You just yell bad insults when you've lost.

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Married A Horn said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

whiterock said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Yep. So any more about the Durham investigation?

Mark Twain was right when he said "it's easier to con a man than to make him see he's been conned."

Trump knew this was all a lie and y'all fell for it.

---

Durham exposed that three documents used to justify spying and investigating Trump were all sourced to HRC. That's a stone cold fact.

---

NO, it literally isn't.

After YEARS of searching for a smoking gun, the best Durham could find was that Sussman, a lawyer who had multiple clients including a cyber security expert and HRC, passed documents on to the FBI -which were suspect, supposedly lied to the FBI.

that's it?

Notice that no one is calling the evidence false, and that Trump wasn't injured at all (he won the election and hasn't shut the **** up about this since). The court literally saw all the evidence and declined to find anyone guilty after looking at it for about 5 minutes.

You aren't making the argument you think you're making. At some point you have to begin to wonder if you've been had, man. It's okay. A lot of people lost their minds in support of Trump. A lot of people are searching for meaning in bull**** made up conspiracy theories because they want to believe they're special.

You should be more skeptical.

---

You are spectacularly poorly informed. Everyone knows the evidence was false. Even NYT has admitted it.

That's what makes the whole thing so outrageous. FBI knew it was nonsense. But they investigated it anyway, because they were afraid to tell team Clinton to go pound sand. because they thought she was going to win and they didn't want to miss a promotion.

---

Yes yes. The Clinton's are just SO powerful and corrupt. Masterminds. And yet they're unable to rig an election and get away with it. Or beat some ****bird racist ****wad.

I guess they're all too busy grooming children?

You are all addled beyond belief. You will believe absolutely anything that keeps you from admitting you've been had.

---

Your trust in hunter biden, china, poopy pants joe and politicians in general is hilarious

---

You zealots are all the same. You just yell bad insults when you've lost.

---

With Poopy Pants Joe, we have all lost. If you can still defend him after the carnage he has inflicted on our country in less than two years, you are a part of the problem. Plain and simple. We are not zealots. We are proud Americans.

---

Oh the child groomer is 100% a zealot. She's grooming her children to be lifelong zealots. I'm with you on Biden being horrible. But thats completely irrelevant in a thread about Hilary and her crimes.

Porto-The-Pedo Supporter at it again I see...

Episode...I've lost count...in the "accusation as a confession" saga.

2. Durham went after the private emails of a George Soros aide based on a claim in a dubious Russian intel memo. A judge twice rejected his request for an order for info about them, so he turned to grand jury powers to get them, leading to internal dissent on his team.

— Charlie Savage (@charlie_savage) January 26, 2023

If NYT story is accurate, this is how the news of Durham investigating *literally Donald Trump* was greeted at the time. All of this was cited in contemporary coverage. pic.twitter.com/2BfK1ZsJxy

— Benjy Sarlin (@BenjySarlin) January 26, 2023

HuMcK said:

---

If NYT story is accurate, this is how the news of Durham investigating *literally Donald Trump* was greeted at the time. All of this was cited in contemporary coverage. pic.twitter.com/2BfK1ZsJxy

— Benjy Sarlin (@BenjySarlin) January 26, 2023

---

You're jizzing disinformation everywhere today - tell us more about the Russia Hoax and Juicy Smalls being attacked.