Ministry of Truth

34,911 Views | 650 Replies | Last: 2 mo ago by Cobretti
Cobretti
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:07p, 4/29/22


Reply Quote
1
1 edit
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:08p, 4/29/22
Safe and effective.
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
Reply Quote
Mothra
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cobretti • 1:31p, 4/29/22
Cobretti said:


Sam Lowry's reaction:

Reply Quote
3
Forest Bueller_bf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DallasBear21 • 1:41p, 4/29/22
DallasBear21 said:
I am personally thrilled I have a government agency that can decide truth for me! These experts were right all along during Covid! They saved millions of lives and helped keep our children safe!

/s
Biden's administration is sounding more and more like a bunch of commies all the time.
Reply Quote
6
Sam Lowry
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Mothra • 1:42p, 4/29/22
Uhh…okay?
Reply Quote
FLBear5630
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Whiskey Pete • 1:48p, 4/29/22
Rawhide said:
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:
Just gotta survive six more months. Democrats gonna be taken to the train station in November.
Wish I could believe ya'.... they'll pull a trick or two expand mail in balloting and ballot harvesting
Don't worry, COVID will be back come August to require mail in voting and vote harvesting.
Reply Quote
5
Harrison Bergeron
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cobretti • 1:51p, 4/29/22
Cobretti said:


I could not fight through the two girls ... what was THAT?
Reply Quote
Robert Wilson
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cobretti • 1:57p, 4/29/22
Cobretti said:


Thanks to these clips, Sam finally managed an erection without looking at Fauci.
Reply Quote
6
Mothra
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 3:10p, 4/29/22
Sam Lowry said:
Uhh…okay?
You told us we have nothing to worry about. We're borrowing trouble and being hysterical. Doesn't matter that a bunch of partisan leftists are running the board. We don't know for sure what it's going to do, so nothing to worry about.

Remember?

Joking with you. Lighten up.


Reply Quote
2 edits
Forest Bueller_bf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Doc Holliday • 3:30p, 4/29/22
Doc Holliday said:


The Government never has been and never will be the arbitor of "truth".

Unless we convert to a totalitarian state, then of course "comrad" Biden and his ministers
will take that rein.

China, tells their people what is truth.

North Korea tells their people what is truth.

No thank you.

I can figure out truth on my own.
Reply Quote
5
Forest Bueller_bf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Robert Wilson • 3:31p, 4/29/22
Robert Wilson said:
Cobretti said:


Thanks to these clips, Sam finally managed an erection without looking at Fauci.
Why is it always upper middle class white girls.
Reply Quote
2
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Forest Bueller_bf • 3:45p, 4/29/22
Forest Bueller_bf said:
Robert Wilson said:
Cobretti said:


Thanks to these clips, Sam finally managed an erection without looking at Fauci.
Why is it always upper middle class white girls.
I am kinda shocked Biden didn't choose a crippled transgender black woman!
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
Reply Quote
4
FLBear5630
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Forest Bueller_bf • 3:53p, 4/29/22
Forest Bueller_bf said:
Robert Wilson said:
Cobretti said:


Thanks to these clips, Sam finally managed an erection without looking at Fauci.
Why is it always upper middle class white girls.


They give credibility to the story.
Reply Quote
2
Malbec
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 4:28p, 4/29/22
Sam Lowry said:
Mothra said:
Sam Lowry said:
I didn't say I was cool with it. I am 1) amused by hysterical reactions like yours and 2) questioning what exactly the problem is. As far as I can tell Doc's response pretty well sums up the issue. They are not creating a new agency, by the way.
Two questions:

1) You seriously can't think of what problems may arise by a Democrat administration's formation of a board designed to fight "disinformation"?

2) Have you been living on another planet the past couple of years?

"Hysterical." LOL. Like the word "conservative," in the words of Inigo Montoya, "I don't think that word means what you think it means."
1) Of course I can imagine problems that might arise. I don't necessarily assume them as fact, though. Do you see the difference? A lot depends on what powers the board exercises, which no one here seems to know.

2) Yes. It's called Earth, and I send regular dispatches from my outpost here. Stay tuned.
There is a reason your grandmother told you not to run with scissors. You might not "assume" something bad was going to happen, but she gave you that warning nonetheless. If you still can see out of both eyes, you can thank granny.
Reply Quote
5
303Bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Forest Bueller_bf • 5:07p, 4/29/22
Forest Bueller_bf said:
Robert Wilson said:
Cobretti said:


Thanks to these clips, Sam finally managed an erection without looking at Fauci.
Why is it always upper middle class white girls.
(im)perfect combo of time, money and a total lack of self awareness.
Reply Quote
2
ABC BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:58p, 4/29/22
Red state governors should formulate a plan to order the State Police to arrest any federal official serving a warrant or attempting to seize property of a citizen accused of spreading 'disinformation'.
Reply Quote
1
jupiter
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:18p, 4/29/22
Reply Quote
LIB,MR BEARS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 8:24a, 4/30/22
Sam Lowry said:
I didn't say I was cool with it. I am 1) amused by hysterical reactions like yours and 2) questioning what exactly the problem is. As far as I can tell Doc's response pretty well sums up the issue. They are not creating a new agency, by the way.
Sam is also pro education...

and pro re-education

He is for free housing of Japanese-Americans

Providing warm, comfortable blankets to native Americans

He knows that the government is made up of people that have the best interest of the nation in mind.

Sam wants what is best for all of us...

even if it has to be forced on us.
Reply Quote
8
LIB,MR BEARS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 8:32a, 4/30/22
Sam Lowry said:
Uhh…okay?
quit reading at "uhh". Repetitious
Reply Quote
2
Robert Wilson
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 303Bear • 6:02p, 4/30/22
303Bear said:
Forest Bueller_bf said:
Robert Wilson said:
Cobretti said:


Thanks to these clips, Sam finally managed an erection without looking at Fauci.
Why is it always upper middle class white girls.
(im)perfect combo of time, money and a total lack of self awareness.


"I start with a man, and I take away reason and accountability."

Then figure most women of lower socioeconomic class or of color have real **** to worry about.

And figure women of higher classes are also worried about their own ****, in different ways. This is an area for strivers.
Reply Quote
BUbearinARK
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:19p, 4/30/22
Ivermectin Rocks!






Just wanted to get that in before imprisonment.
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
Sam Lowry
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Malbec • 6:34p, 4/30/22
Malbec said:
Sam Lowry said:
Mothra said:
Sam Lowry said:
I didn't say I was cool with it. I am 1) amused by hysterical reactions like yours and 2) questioning what exactly the problem is. As far as I can tell Doc's response pretty well sums up the issue. They are not creating a new agency, by the way.
Two questions:

1) You seriously can't think of what problems may arise by a Democrat administration's formation of a board designed to fight "disinformation"?

2) Have you been living on another planet the past couple of years?

"Hysterical." LOL. Like the word "conservative," in the words of Inigo Montoya, "I don't think that word means what you think it means."
1) Of course I can imagine problems that might arise. I don't necessarily assume them as fact, though. Do you see the difference? A lot depends on what powers the board exercises, which no one here seems to know.

2) Yes. It's called Earth, and I send regular dispatches from my outpost here. Stay tuned.
There is a reason your grandmother told you not to run with scissors. You might not "assume" something bad was going to happen, but she gave you that warning nonetheless. If you still can see out of both eyes, you can thank granny.
What exactly are we running with? Do you know? What I've heard so far is...there's a board.
Reply Quote
JXL
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 7:45p, 4/30/22
Sam Lowry said:
Malbec said:
Sam Lowry said:
Mothra said:
Sam Lowry said:
I didn't say I was cool with it. I am 1) amused by hysterical reactions like yours and 2) questioning what exactly the problem is. As far as I can tell Doc's response pretty well sums up the issue. They are not creating a new agency, by the way.
Two questions:

1) You seriously can't think of what problems may arise by a Democrat administration's formation of a board designed to fight "disinformation"?

2) Have you been living on another planet the past couple of years?

"Hysterical." LOL. Like the word "conservative," in the words of Inigo Montoya, "I don't think that word means what you think it means."
1) Of course I can imagine problems that might arise. I don't necessarily assume them as fact, though. Do you see the difference? A lot depends on what powers the board exercises, which no one here seems to know.

2) Yes. It's called Earth, and I send regular dispatches from my outpost here. Stay tuned.
There is a reason your grandmother told you not to run with scissors. You might not "assume" something bad was going to happen, but she gave you that warning nonetheless. If you still can see out of both eyes, you can thank granny.
What exactly are we running with? Do you know? What I've heard so far is...there's a board.


The fact that people are even talking about such a board is itself cause for alarm.
Reply Quote
7
Fre3dombear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to RD2WINAGNBEAR86 • 8:06p, 4/30/22
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:
Just gotta survive six more months. Democrats gonna be taken to the train station in November.


Na. The socialists figured out how to count the votes.
Reply Quote
3
Sam Lowry
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to JXL • 8:08p, 4/30/22
JXL said:
Sam Lowry said:
Malbec said:
Sam Lowry said:
Mothra said:
Sam Lowry said:
I didn't say I was cool with it. I am 1) amused by hysterical reactions like yours and 2) questioning what exactly the problem is. As far as I can tell Doc's response pretty well sums up the issue. They are not creating a new agency, by the way.
Two questions:

1) You seriously can't think of what problems may arise by a Democrat administration's formation of a board designed to fight "disinformation"?

2) Have you been living on another planet the past couple of years?

"Hysterical." LOL. Like the word "conservative," in the words of Inigo Montoya, "I don't think that word means what you think it means."
1) Of course I can imagine problems that might arise. I don't necessarily assume them as fact, though. Do you see the difference? A lot depends on what powers the board exercises, which no one here seems to know.

2) Yes. It's called Earth, and I send regular dispatches from my outpost here. Stay tuned.
There is a reason your grandmother told you not to run with scissors. You might not "assume" something bad was going to happen, but she gave you that warning nonetheless. If you still can see out of both eyes, you can thank granny.
What exactly are we running with? Do you know? What I've heard so far is...there's a board.


The fact that people are even talking about such a board is itself cause for alarm.
What is "such a board?" What are the characteristics that make it alarming?
Reply Quote
Cobretti
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:31p, 4/30/22
Reply Quote
1
4th and Inches
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 8:32p, 4/30/22
Sam Lowry said:
JXL said:
Sam Lowry said:
Malbec said:
Sam Lowry said:
Mothra said:
Sam Lowry said:
I didn't say I was cool with it. I am 1) amused by hysterical reactions like yours and 2) questioning what exactly the problem is. As far as I can tell Doc's response pretty well sums up the issue. They are not creating a new agency, by the way.
Two questions:

1) You seriously can't think of what problems may arise by a Democrat administration's formation of a board designed to fight "disinformation"?

2) Have you been living on another planet the past couple of years?

"Hysterical." LOL. Like the word "conservative," in the words of Inigo Montoya, "I don't think that word means what you think it means."
1) Of course I can imagine problems that might arise. I don't necessarily assume them as fact, though. Do you see the difference? A lot depends on what powers the board exercises, which no one here seems to know.

2) Yes. It's called Earth, and I send regular dispatches from my outpost here. Stay tuned.
There is a reason your grandmother told you not to run with scissors. You might not "assume" something bad was going to happen, but she gave you that warning nonetheless. If you still can see out of both eyes, you can thank granny.
What exactly are we running with? Do you know? What I've heard so far is...there's a board.


The fact that people are even talking about such a board is itself cause for alarm.
What is "such a board?" What are the characteristics that make it alarming?
the same characteristics that alarm people when the FBI are adding concerned parents who voice opinions at school board meetings to domestic terrorist watch lists.
Reply Quote
7
4th and Inches
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:36p, 4/30/22


I would like to report more misinformation to the board of Truth!

$669million is close to zero

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000095017022000796/tsla-20211231.htm
Reply Quote
5
Sam Lowry
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 4th and Inches • 8:39p, 4/30/22
4th and Inches said:
Sam Lowry said:
JXL said:
Sam Lowry said:
Malbec said:
Sam Lowry said:
Mothra said:
Sam Lowry said:
I didn't say I was cool with it. I am 1) amused by hysterical reactions like yours and 2) questioning what exactly the problem is. As far as I can tell Doc's response pretty well sums up the issue. They are not creating a new agency, by the way.
Two questions:

1) You seriously can't think of what problems may arise by a Democrat administration's formation of a board designed to fight "disinformation"?

2) Have you been living on another planet the past couple of years?

"Hysterical." LOL. Like the word "conservative," in the words of Inigo Montoya, "I don't think that word means what you think it means."
1) Of course I can imagine problems that might arise. I don't necessarily assume them as fact, though. Do you see the difference? A lot depends on what powers the board exercises, which no one here seems to know.

2) Yes. It's called Earth, and I send regular dispatches from my outpost here. Stay tuned.
There is a reason your grandmother told you not to run with scissors. You might not "assume" something bad was going to happen, but she gave you that warning nonetheless. If you still can see out of both eyes, you can thank granny.
What exactly are we running with? Do you know? What I've heard so far is...there's a board.


The fact that people are even talking about such a board is itself cause for alarm.
What is "such a board?" What are the characteristics that make it alarming?
the same characteristics that alarm people when the FBI are adding concerned parents who voice opinions at school board meetings to domestic terrorist watch lists.
So the FBI shouldn't monitor terrorists?
Reply Quote
Wangchung
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 8:49p, 4/30/22
Sam Lowry said:
4th and Inches said:
Sam Lowry said:
JXL said:
Sam Lowry said:
Malbec said:
Sam Lowry said:
Mothra said:
Sam Lowry said:
I didn't say I was cool with it. I am 1) amused by hysterical reactions like yours and 2) questioning what exactly the problem is. As far as I can tell Doc's response pretty well sums up the issue. They are not creating a new agency, by the way.
Two questions:

1) You seriously can't think of what problems may arise by a Democrat administration's formation of a board designed to fight "disinformation"?

2) Have you been living on another planet the past couple of years?

"Hysterical." LOL. Like the word "conservative," in the words of Inigo Montoya, "I don't think that word means what you think it means."
1) Of course I can imagine problems that might arise. I don't necessarily assume them as fact, though. Do you see the difference? A lot depends on what powers the board exercises, which no one here seems to know.

2) Yes. It's called Earth, and I send regular dispatches from my outpost here. Stay tuned.
There is a reason your grandmother told you not to run with scissors. You might not "assume" something bad was going to happen, but she gave you that warning nonetheless. If you still can see out of both eyes, you can thank granny.
What exactly are we running with? Do you know? What I've heard so far is...there's a board.


The fact that people are even talking about such a board is itself cause for alarm.
What is "such a board?" What are the characteristics that make it alarming?
the same characteristics that alarm people when the FBI are adding concerned parents who voice opinions at school board meetings to domestic terrorist watch lists.
So the FBI shouldn't monitor terrorists?
"The terrorists won't let us sexually groom their children!!!"
Reply Quote
5
4th and Inches
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 8:57p, 4/30/22
Sam Lowry said:
4th and Inches said:
Sam Lowry said:
JXL said:
Sam Lowry said:
Malbec said:
Sam Lowry said:
Mothra said:
Sam Lowry said:
I didn't say I was cool with it. I am 1) amused by hysterical reactions like yours and 2) questioning what exactly the problem is. As far as I can tell Doc's response pretty well sums up the issue. They are not creating a new agency, by the way.
Two questions:

1) You seriously can't think of what problems may arise by a Democrat administration's formation of a board designed to fight "disinformation"?

2) Have you been living on another planet the past couple of years?

"Hysterical." LOL. Like the word "conservative," in the words of Inigo Montoya, "I don't think that word means what you think it means."
1) Of course I can imagine problems that might arise. I don't necessarily assume them as fact, though. Do you see the difference? A lot depends on what powers the board exercises, which no one here seems to know.

2) Yes. It's called Earth, and I send regular dispatches from my outpost here. Stay tuned.
There is a reason your grandmother told you not to run with scissors. You might not "assume" something bad was going to happen, but she gave you that warning nonetheless. If you still can see out of both eyes, you can thank granny.
What exactly are we running with? Do you know? What I've heard so far is...there's a board.


The fact that people are even talking about such a board is itself cause for alarm.
What is "such a board?" What are the characteristics that make it alarming?
the same characteristics that alarm people when the FBI are adding concerned parents who voice opinions at school board meetings to domestic terrorist watch lists.
So the FBI shouldn't monitor terrorists?
Reply Quote
2
Mothra
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 9:08p, 4/30/22
Sam Lowry said:
JXL said:
Sam Lowry said:
Malbec said:
Sam Lowry said:
Mothra said:
Sam Lowry said:
I didn't say I was cool with it. I am 1) amused by hysterical reactions like yours and 2) questioning what exactly the problem is. As far as I can tell Doc's response pretty well sums up the issue. They are not creating a new agency, by the way.
Two questions:

1) You seriously can't think of what problems may arise by a Democrat administration's formation of a board designed to fight "disinformation"?

2) Have you been living on another planet the past couple of years?

"Hysterical." LOL. Like the word "conservative," in the words of Inigo Montoya, "I don't think that word means what you think it means."
1) Of course I can imagine problems that might arise. I don't necessarily assume them as fact, though. Do you see the difference? A lot depends on what powers the board exercises, which no one here seems to know.

2) Yes. It's called Earth, and I send regular dispatches from my outpost here. Stay tuned.
There is a reason your grandmother told you not to run with scissors. You might not "assume" something bad was going to happen, but she gave you that warning nonetheless. If you still can see out of both eyes, you can thank granny.
What exactly are we running with? Do you know? What I've heard so far is...there's a board.


The fact that people are even talking about such a board is itself cause for alarm.
What is "such a board?" What are the characteristics that make it alarming?
What happened to the libertarian-leaning, limited-govt. advocating Sam Lowry? The guy who incessantly decried the govt. overreach of the Patriot Act back during the Bush years? He would have bristled with the suggestion of a partisan, govt.-created board designed to "re"educate Americans. Did Trump and COVID scare it out of him? Or does he only bristle at such overreach when it occurs under a Republican administration?

The dangers of such a board are self-evident.I suspect your friend quash could help you understand the dangers.
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
Sam Lowry
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Mothra • 9:44p, 4/30/22
Mothra said:
Sam Lowry said:
JXL said:
Sam Lowry said:
Malbec said:
Sam Lowry said:
Mothra said:
Sam Lowry said:
I didn't say I was cool with it. I am 1) amused by hysterical reactions like yours and 2) questioning what exactly the problem is. As far as I can tell Doc's response pretty well sums up the issue. They are not creating a new agency, by the way.
Two questions:

1) You seriously can't think of what problems may arise by a Democrat administration's formation of a board designed to fight "disinformation"?

2) Have you been living on another planet the past couple of years?

"Hysterical." LOL. Like the word "conservative," in the words of Inigo Montoya, "I don't think that word means what you think it means."
1) Of course I can imagine problems that might arise. I don't necessarily assume them as fact, though. Do you see the difference? A lot depends on what powers the board exercises, which no one here seems to know.

2) Yes. It's called Earth, and I send regular dispatches from my outpost here. Stay tuned.
There is a reason your grandmother told you not to run with scissors. You might not "assume" something bad was going to happen, but she gave you that warning nonetheless. If you still can see out of both eyes, you can thank granny.
What exactly are we running with? Do you know? What I've heard so far is...there's a board.


The fact that people are even talking about such a board is itself cause for alarm.
What is "such a board?" What are the characteristics that make it alarming?
What happened to the libertarian-leaning, limited-govt. advocating Sam Lowry? The guy who incessantly decried the govt. overreach of the Patriot Act back during the Bush years? He would have bristled with the suggestion of a partisan, govt.-created board designed to "re"educate Americans. Did Trump and COVID scare it out of him? Or does he only bristle at such overreach when it occurs under a Republican administration?

The dangers of such a board are self-evident.I suspect your friend quash could help you understand the dangers.
I was challenged in my opposition to the Patriot Act just as I'm challenging you now. In response I listed about ten specific things enabled by the Act which I found objectionable. What specific powers does this DHS board have which you find objectionable?
Reply Quote
1
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 10:00p, 4/30/22
Sam Lowry said:
4th and Inches said:
Sam Lowry said:
JXL said:
Sam Lowry said:
Malbec said:
Sam Lowry said:
Mothra said:
Sam Lowry said:
I didn't say I was cool with it. I am 1) amused by hysterical reactions like yours and 2) questioning what exactly the problem is. As far as I can tell Doc's response pretty well sums up the issue. They are not creating a new agency, by the way.
Two questions:

1) You seriously can't think of what problems may arise by a Democrat administration's formation of a board designed to fight "disinformation"?

2) Have you been living on another planet the past couple of years?

"Hysterical." LOL. Like the word "conservative," in the words of Inigo Montoya, "I don't think that word means what you think it means."
1) Of course I can imagine problems that might arise. I don't necessarily assume them as fact, though. Do you see the difference? A lot depends on what powers the board exercises, which no one here seems to know.

2) Yes. It's called Earth, and I send regular dispatches from my outpost here. Stay tuned.
There is a reason your grandmother told you not to run with scissors. You might not "assume" something bad was going to happen, but she gave you that warning nonetheless. If you still can see out of both eyes, you can thank granny.
What exactly are we running with? Do you know? What I've heard so far is...there's a board.


The fact that people are even talking about such a board is itself cause for alarm.
What is "such a board?" What are the characteristics that make it alarming?
the same characteristics that alarm people when the FBI are adding concerned parents who voice opinions at school board meetings to domestic terrorist watch lists.
So the FBI shouldn't monitor terrorists?
In the year of our Lord 2022, the FBI are the terrorists!
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
Reply Quote
5
LIB,MR BEARS
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to RD2WINAGNBEAR86 • 10:48p, 4/30/22
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:
Sam Lowry said:
4th and Inches said:
Sam Lowry said:
JXL said:
Sam Lowry said:
Malbec said:
Sam Lowry said:
Mothra said:
Sam Lowry said:
I didn't say I was cool with it. I am 1) amused by hysterical reactions like yours and 2) questioning what exactly the problem is. As far as I can tell Doc's response pretty well sums up the issue. They are not creating a new agency, by the way.
Two questions:

1) You seriously can't think of what problems may arise by a Democrat administration's formation of a board designed to fight "disinformation"?

2) Have you been living on another planet the past couple of years?

"Hysterical." LOL. Like the word "conservative," in the words of Inigo Montoya, "I don't think that word means what you think it means."
1) Of course I can imagine problems that might arise. I don't necessarily assume them as fact, though. Do you see the difference? A lot depends on what powers the board exercises, which no one here seems to know.

2) Yes. It's called Earth, and I send regular dispatches from my outpost here. Stay tuned.
There is a reason your grandmother told you not to run with scissors. You might not "assume" something bad was going to happen, but she gave you that warning nonetheless. If you still can see out of both eyes, you can thank granny.
What exactly are we running with? Do you know? What I've heard so far is...there's a board.


The fact that people are even talking about such a board is itself cause for alarm.
What is "such a board?" What are the characteristics that make it alarming?
the same characteristics that alarm people when the FBI are adding concerned parents who voice opinions at school board meetings to domestic terrorist watch lists.
So the FBI shouldn't monitor terrorists?
In the year of our Lord 2022, the FBI are the terrorists!
IRS has the week off.
Reply Quote
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.