Roe v. Wade Overruled?

51,901 Views | 701 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by Forest Bueller_bf
Wangchung
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Chipoople • 1:18p, 6/24/22
Chipoople said:
Forest Bueller_bf said:
Redbrickbear said:

Quote:
The state's Republican leadership has long sought to ban abortions, but Roe v. Wade has kept lawmakers from doing so. With that 49-year-old case now overturned, a trigger law will go into effect in the coming weeks that bans all abortions from the moment of fertilization, except in rare cases to save the life of a pregnant patient or prevent "substantial impairment of major bodily function."


Does that include ectopic pregnancies? Because statistically speaking they are not rare at all.
But those aren't abortions, as ectopic pregnancies are non-viable pregnancies.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

Reply Quote
Forest Bueller_bf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Chipoople • 1:31p, 6/24/22
Chipoople said:
Forest Bueller_bf said:
Redbrickbear said:

Quote:
The state's Republican leadership has long sought to ban abortions, but Roe v. Wade has kept lawmakers from doing so. With that 49-year-old case now overturned, a trigger law will go into effect in the coming weeks that bans all abortions from the moment of fertilization, except in rare cases to save the life of a pregnant patient or prevent "substantial impairment of major bodily function."


Does that include ectopic pregnancies? Because statistically speaking they are not rare at all.
From what I've read yes.
Reply Quote
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.