Amal Shuq-Up said:

---

Fajita meat is almost $18/lb. Gas is $4/gal. Baby killing won't be the top issue in November.

---

Yes it will with Dem controlled media.


Will become their latest dog whistle .


More Churches are going to burn .

Biden statement on Supreme Court draft on Roe v. Wade pic.twitter.com/Xdnkfvbg9G

— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) May 3, 2022

"Amend the constitution"

The left have found their platform for 2022, since they can't run on any accomplishments of the Biden regime.

Canon said:

---

Cobretti said:

---

It’s impossible to overstate the earthquake this will cause inside the Court, in terms of the destruction of trust among the Justices and staff. This leak is the gravest, most unforgivable sin.

— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) May 3, 2022

---

99% likelihood this was leaked by a democrat/leftist staffer (probably a Sotomayor flunky) if not a leftist judge. The intent is probably to try and cause some crazy feminazi rioting and gin up support for the democrat party.

Too bad it'll be drowned out by cheers from sane, stable, employed family men and women who find it horrific to murder babies.

---

99%.

99.9999999% chance.

This was the lowest of the low to do this. It has one purpose and one purpose only, to create hysteria and mayhem.

Now the nutty leftist in Washington are talking about codifying this into permanent law.

That is another part of the reason. I'll bet it is coordinated at some level and we will see well versed talking points completely coordinated from politicians, media, leftist organizations in an effort to make the affects of Roe permanent law.

There is a group of people who have the President's attention who are collectively referred to as the "Gender Policy Council." Perhaps we do have too much government.

Dems/Libs are expressing major support for the act of leaking.

They're basically equating it to whistleblowing.

Here is what it is all about, this from Bidens handlers.

Quote:

---

.............and it will fall on voters to elect Pro-Choice officials this November, at
the Federal level we will need more Pro-Choice Senators, and a Pro-Choice majority
in the House.

---

And just like that, we see the democratic talking points all the way up to Mid-Term elections
in November. This will be the Mid Term push. Saving Roe.

it wont save Roe. People have the choice, unless Dems wrestle it away from us. . The Feds or Dems or Leftys want votes from those who want it...Leave it to the States to decide. If you want an abortion go get one. If you dont then raise a family.

Straight up psychopaths.

Is a brave clerk taking this unpredecented step of leaking a draft opinion to warn the country what's coming in a last-ditch Hail Mary attempt to see if the public response might cause the Court to reconsider?

— Brian Fallon (@brianefallon) May 3, 2022

They believe bullying the court is democracy.

I would not jump to any conclusions about who leaked this.

But if any law clerk was involved, he or she should be disbarred. If any justice was involved, he or she should be impeached.

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Here is what it is all about, this from Bidens handlers.

Quote:

---

.............and it will fall on voters to elect Pro-Choice officials this November, at
the Federal level we will need more Pro-Choice Senators, and a Pro-Choice majority
in the House.

---

And just like that, we see the democratic talking points all the way up to Mid-Term elections
in November. This will be the Mid Term push. Saving Roe.

---

Let's see how it helps them in the polls. In Texas after the most recent child protection (antiabortion) law was passed, republicans gained 10+ seats in the legislature.

Fre3dombear said:

---

Cobretti said:

---

Crowd of protesters is growing quickly, and pushing toward the barricade that the handful of guards put up earlier tonight. Chants of “fascist scum have got to go,” interspersed with the names of the conservative justices pic.twitter.com/2OHtE2pLuy

— Nate Hochman (@njhochman) May 3, 2022

---

Lmao. After all this time still with the hey hey ho ho?????

---

The institutional and cultural left has been replaying the civil rights ear for more than 60 years.

Eternal larping.

They will be yelling "fascist" at a female Hispanic republican presidential nominee in 2060 who advocates for a 10% tax cut.

Booray said:

---

I would not jump to any conclusions about who leaked this.

But if any law clerk was involved, he or she should be disbarred. If any justice was involved, he or she should be impeached.

---

That's not going to happen when Democrats equate this leak with whistleblowing and bravery.

Sheldon Whitehouse just said there should not be an investigation to determine the source of the supreme court leak. Most dems are going to agree with that.

And if it did happen...this person would cash in on book deals and interviews.

muddybrazos said:

---

Twitter saying it was a clerk for Sotomayer that leaked the info which i'm sure everyone could've already guessed.

I think most of the unhinged screaming people think this ruling would overturn abortion altogether but they can all just move to Cali or Ny or any blue state and leave us red state people alone.

---

Sotomayor is a mid level intellect who will go on for decades being a disaster on the Court.

Doc Holliday said:

---

Booray said:

---

I would not jump to any conclusions about who leaked this.

But if any law clerk was involved, he or she should be disbarred. If any justice was involved, he or she should be impeached.

---

That's not going to happen when Democrats equate this leak with whistleblowing and bravery.

---

Again, would not jump to conclusions about the who on this.

If they make it THE issue for November, they may be in for a surprise. Recent polls/surveys indicate a solid majority do not favor abortion on demand.

Dems definitely can't paint this as a "woman's right to choose." Are all Dems biologists? How do we know you are a woman? What about all the men who get pregnant (as Dems believe)?

Booray said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Booray said:

---

I would not jump to any conclusions about who leaked this.

But if any law clerk was involved, he or she should be disbarred. If any justice was involved, he or she should be impeached.

---

That's not going to happen when Democrats equate this leak with whistleblowing and bravery.

---

Again, would not jump to conclusions about the who on this.

---

Doesn't matter who it is...Democrats aren't going pursue accountability.

muddybrazos said:

---

Twitter saying it was a clerk for Sotomayer that leaked the info which i'm sure everyone could've already guessed.

I think most of the unhinged screaming people think this ruling would overturn abortion altogether but they can all just move to Cali or Ny or any blue state and leave us red state people alone.

---

Honestly, I don't think most of them understand that the effect of this is to just make it a legislative issue. They think the SC is "outlawing abortion." It's just sad.

A person called Amit Jain clerks for Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor. As a Yale student, Jain blasted Yale for supporting Brett Kavanaugh's nomination. Jain was quoted in a 2017 Politico piece by Josh Gerstein. Gerstein published the draft SCOTUS opinion on Roe.

Might, at the very least, want to start the investigation there.

Rawhide said:

---

A person called Amit Jain clerks for Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor. As a Yale student, Jain blasted Yale for supporting Brett Kavanaugh's nomination. Jain was quoted in a 2017 Politico piece by Josh Gerstein. Gerstein published the draft SCOTUS opinion on Roe.

Might, at the very least, want to start the investigation there.

---

Insanely irresponsible and disloyal for Sotomayor to hire as a clerk someone who was publicly trying to shout down the nomination of another standing justice.

Abortion after the first trimester is incredibly unpopular in the United States, and outlawed in most of the civilized world. Democrats should 100% vote to codify Roe v Wade. They will not, because see the first sentence of this tweet.

— Cernovich (@Cernovich) May 3, 2022

Rawhide said:

---

A person called Amit Jain clerks for Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor. As a Yale student, Jain blasted Yale for supporting Brett Kavanaugh's nomination. Jain was quoted in a 2017 Politico piece by Josh Gerstein. Gerstein published the draft SCOTUS opinion on Roe.

Might, at the very least, want to start the investigation there.

---

Amit doesnt like the way things are done in America. Also, Parag Agrawal, the twitter CEO, doesn't agree with the first amendment protecting speech or how Vidjaya Gadde, the twitter attorney, thinks it's up to her to censor conservatives. I see a pattern developing here.

muddybrazos said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

A person called Amit Jain clerks for Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor. As a Yale student, Jain blasted Yale for supporting Brett Kavanaugh's nomination. Jain was quoted in a 2017 Politico piece by Josh Gerstein. Gerstein published the draft SCOTUS opinion on Roe.

Might, at the very least, want to start the investigation there.

---

Amit doesnt like the way things are done in America. Also, Parag Agrawal, the twitter CEO, doesn't agree with the first amendment protecting speech or how Vidjaya Gadde, the twitter attorney, thinks it's up to her to censor conservatives. I see a pattern developing here.

---

Something rotten in the state of Punjab?

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

muddybrazos said:

---

Twitter saying it was a clerk for Sotomayer that leaked the info which i'm sure everyone could've already guessed.

I think most of the unhinged screaming people think this ruling would overturn abortion altogether but they can all just move to Cali or Ny or any blue state and leave us red state people alone.

---

You exponentially underestimate how ignorant the loudest of the left-wing nuts are about government and how it works. The average lunatic on twatter barely knows what SCOTUS is and how it works. They just get emotionally outraged every time they do not get their way and lack the ability to rationally think about law, government, reason, etc.

---

While you are correct, ignorance of how our government works is equally distributed across political viewpoints.

BREAKING: Supreme Court chief justice directs marshal to investigate leak, calls out 'egregious breach of ... trust' https://t.co/KmCI9a4Gkr

— Fox News (@FoxNews) May 3, 2022

In 1982 Joe Biden proposed a constitutional amendment that would overturn Roe v. Wade and allow states to choose their own policies on abortion.

— David Harsanyi (@davidharsanyi) May 3, 2022

Cobretti said:

---

In 1982 Joe Biden proposed a constitutional amendment that would overturn Roe v. Wade and allow states to choose their own policies on abortion.

— David Harsanyi (@davidharsanyi) May 3, 2022

---

But that was before Joe got 81 million votes, a phone, and a pen.

Booray said:

---

I would not jump to any conclusions about who leaked this.

But if any law clerk was involved, he or she should be disbarred. If any justice was involved, he or she should be impeached.

---

be honest for a minute...

do you really think it was someone working for Alito, Thomas, Kavanaugh, Roberts, Gorsch, or Barrett? How would this leak benefit any of them?

This is CLEARLY done by one of the leftist wackos or their staffs. They are the only ones who could possibly benefit from such a horrible action. This is on par with ballot harvesting, or some other method of election fraud... this is an action designed to destroy our Judicial system and our Republic. No one would just do this for the heck of it.. there must be a huge payout to take this damaging action.

Robert Wilson said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

A person called Amit Jain clerks for Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor. As a Yale student, Jain blasted Yale for supporting Brett Kavanaugh's nomination. Jain was quoted in a 2017 Politico piece by Josh Gerstein. Gerstein published the draft SCOTUS opinion on Roe.

Might, at the very least, want to start the investigation there.

---

Insanely irresponsible and disloyal for Sotomayor to hire as a clerk someone who was publicly trying to shout down the nomination of another standing justice.

---

Sotomayor isn't a justice... she is a wack-job activist with a black robe.

She should never be within 100 meters of the building, much less sitting on the bench.

Robert Wilson said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

A person called Amit Jain clerks for Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor. As a Yale student, Jain blasted Yale for supporting Brett Kavanaugh's nomination. Jain was quoted in a 2017 Politico piece by Josh Gerstein. Gerstein published the draft SCOTUS opinion on Roe.

Might, at the very least, want to start the investigation there.

---

Insanely irresponsible and disloyal for Sotomayor to hire as a clerk someone who was publicly trying to shout down the nomination of another standing justice.

---

It may or may not be Sotomayor's office that did it...

But it would not be the first time they were responsible for something like this.

https://www.npr.org/2022/01/18/1073428376/supreme-court-justices-arent-scorpions-but-not-happy-campers-either

Someone in her office leaked that: "Sotomayor did not feel safe in close proximity to people who were unmasked. Chief Justice John Roberts, understanding that, in some form asked the other justices to mask up.

They all did. Except Gorsuch, who, as it happens, sits next to Sotomayor on the bench. His continued refusal since then has also meant that Sotomayor has not attended the justices' weekly conference in person, joining instead by telephone."

She and the cabal of young leftist clerks she has around her do not play well with colleagues.

Planned Parenthood Executive Looking Very Nervous For Someone Who's Only Going To Lose 3% Of Their Revenue

https://babylonbee.com/news/planned-parenthood-executive-looking-very-nervous-for-someone-whos-only-going-to-lose-3-of-their-revenue?fbclid=IwAR3TRJGlnP86fTpF_qPhK-un-G6Darl8uQNYP_TxIjHpIGlse5NMD5Ds__o

ShooterTX said:

---

Booray said:

---

I would not jump to any conclusions about who leaked this.

But if any law clerk was involved, he or she should be disbarred. If any justice was involved, he or she should be impeached.

---

be honest for a minute...

do you really think it was someone working for Alito, Thomas, Kavanaugh, Roberts, Gorsch, or Barrett? How would this leak benefit any of them?

This is CLEARLY done by one of the leftist wackos or their staffs. They are the only ones who could possibly benefit from such a horrible action. This is on par with ballot harvesting, or some other method of election fraud... this is an action designed to destroy our Judicial system and our Republic. No one would just do this for the heck of it.. there must be a huge payout to take this damaging action.

---

Nothing in D.C. ever surprises me.

But if I had to guess, Politico did not get this draft directly from anybody at SCOTUS. Instead, a clerk shared it with someone outside and that person then leaked.

It could be that it was not intended for further release, although that doesn't lessen the breach of protocol. And given that the Federalist Society basically runs the Federal Courts it would not stun me if the draft opinion was circulated in those circumstances.

Not to say that a liberal clerk leak isn't a likely conclusion.

Redbrickbear said:

---

Fre3dombear said:

---

Cobretti said:

---

Crowd of protesters is growing quickly, and pushing toward the barricade that the handful of guards put up earlier tonight. Chants of “fascist scum have got to go,” interspersed with the names of the conservative justices pic.twitter.com/2OHtE2pLuy

— Nate Hochman (@njhochman) May 3, 2022

---

Lmao. After all this time still with the hey hey ho ho?????

---

The institutional and cultural left has been replaying the civil rights ear for more than 60 years.

Eternal larping.

They will be yelling "fascist" at a female Hispanic republican presidential nominee in 2060 who advocates for a 10% tax cut.

---

I hear what Booray is saying about not jumping to conclusions about who would leak this, but it would take a moron of the highest level for a conservative to leak something that is going to precipitate another summer of discontent. All of vitriol aimed at conservatives. This is the progressive playbook, not really seeing it as jumping to conclusions.

Democratic candidate for AG in Florida.

Calling for violence revolution to defend abortion. Does this count as inciting insurrection?

It’s time for a revolution.

— Daniel Uhlfelder (@DWUhlfelderLaw) May 3, 2022

Booray said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

Booray said:

---

I would not jump to any conclusions about who leaked this.

But if any law clerk was involved, he or she should be disbarred. If any justice was involved, he or she should be impeached.

---

be honest for a minute...

do you really think it was someone working for Alito, Thomas, Kavanaugh, Roberts, Gorsch, or Barrett? How would this leak benefit any of them?

This is CLEARLY done by one of the leftist wackos or their staffs. They are the only ones who could possibly benefit from such a horrible action. This is on par with ballot harvesting, or some other method of election fraud... this is an action designed to destroy our Judicial system and our Republic. No one would just do this for the heck of it.. there must be a huge payout to take this damaging action.

---

Nothing in D.C. ever surprises me.

But if I had to guess, Politico did not get this draft directly from anybody at SCOTUS. Instead, a clerk shared it with someone outside and that person then leaked.

It could be that it was not intended for further release, although that doesn't lessen the breach of protocol. And given that the Federalist Society basically runs the Federal Courts it would not stun me if the draft opinion was circulated in those circumstances.

Not to say that a liberal clerk leak isn't a likely conclusion.

---

In both the NFIB v. Sibelius and Bostock cases there were rumors leaked that a conservative justice was leaning toward a vote with the left. Last week it was reported that Roberts wanted to uphold the Mississippi law in Dobbs without overturning Roe and that he was trying to pull a conservative justice away from the majority. Perhaps in this case, similar to NFIB and Bostock, the leak is meant to pressure conservative justices to hold the line. That would be bad news for pro-lifers, as leaking the full opinion seems a desperate act and would suggest that one or more conservative justices is seriously wavering. But I'm hoping the vote is secure and this is a play by the left.