Roe v. Wade Overruled?

50,420 Views | 701 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by Forest Bueller_bf
Canon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

ShooterTX said:

No surprise that this got leaked.
The radical left has no respect for anything.
They wanted to leak this so that their minions can take to the streets and rage like they did with Saint Floyd of the holy fentanyl overdose.

They can't win legally so they will use intimidation, threats and violence to protect the holy sacrement of baby killing.


A constitutionally protected right, set out in a precedent setting case, is about to be overruled. In an opinion that references Obergfell, Griswold and Loving.

But yeah, the leak is the real story here. Tell me again how autocrats don't control the narrative. And remind me how this grab for government power over women represents limited government.

And all of you that heehawed over Sam and Oso as liberal? Check again.



Since you misrepresent how those cases are mentioned and don't address the limited federal government reasoning behind the decision, perhaps you should read the actual decision (draft as it may be) and figure out just how full of $ # 1 7 you are.
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

ShooterTX said:

No surprise that this got leaked.
The radical left has no respect for anything.
They wanted to leak this so that their minions can take to the streets and rage like they did with Saint Floyd of the holy fentanyl overdose.

They can't win legally so they will use intimidation, threats and violence to protect the holy sacrement of baby killing.


A constitutionally protected right, set out in a precedent setting case, is about to be overruled. In an opinion that references Obergfell, Griswold and Loving. (RBG said overturning RvW was her dying wish)

But yeah, the leak is the real story here. (Yes, it is) Tell me again how autocrats don't control the narrative (they do but it's not the one you think it is) And remind me how this grab for government power over women represents limited government. Don't try to kill your kid and the government won't be involved at all, in certain states. Other states let you satiate your bloodlust all you want)

And all of you that heehawed over Sam and Oso as liberal? Check again.

checked. I'm still good.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

quash said:

ShooterTX said:

No surprise that this got leaked.
The radical left has no respect for anything.
They wanted to leak this so that their minions can take to the streets and rage like they did with Saint Floyd of the holy fentanyl overdose.

They can't win legally so they will use intimidation, threats and violence to protect the holy sacrement of baby killing.


A constitutionally protected right, set out in a precedent setting case, is about to be overruled. In an opinion that references Obergfell, Griswold and Loving. (RBG said overturning RvW was her dying wish)

But yeah, the leak is the real story here. (Yes, it is) Tell me again how autocrats don't control the narrative (they do but it's not the one you think it is) And remind me how this grab for government power over women represents limited government. Don't try to kill your kid and the government won't be involved at all, in certain states. Other states let you satiate your bloodlust all you want)

And all of you that heehawed over Sam and Oso as liberal? Check again.

checked. I'm still good.
Pshh!
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

quash said:

ShooterTX said:

No surprise that this got leaked.
The radical left has no respect for anything.
They wanted to leak this so that their minions can take to the streets and rage like they did with Saint Floyd of the holy fentanyl overdose.

They can't win legally so they will use intimidation, threats and violence to protect the holy sacrement of baby killing.


A constitutionally protected right, set out in a precedent setting case, is about to be overruled. In an opinion that references Obergfell, Griswold and Loving. (RBG said overturning RvW was her dying wish)

But yeah, the leak is the real story here. (Yes, it is) Tell me again how autocrats don't control the narrative (they do but it's not the one you think it is) And remind me how this grab for government power over women represents limited government. Don't try to kill your kid and the government won't be involved at all, in certain states. Other states let you satiate your bloodlust all you want)

And all of you that heehawed over Sam and Oso as liberal? Check again.

checked. I'm still good.
Hey, me too.
Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
BearlySpeaking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:


I see these type of outbursts every now and then where a slogan is repeated multiple times. Chanting or repeating slogans means you have no rational argument. Repetition is not a criterion of a true statement.

Not to mention this ignores the women in Congress and on the Supreme Court who make or rule on laws affecting both men and women.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:


Thank God people are admitting there are only two genders again. We are back to men are men and women are women. Anything else is untreated mental illness..
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:



What is a woman?
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canon said:

quash said:

ShooterTX said:

No surprise that this got leaked.
The radical left has no respect for anything.
They wanted to leak this so that their minions can take to the streets and rage like they did with Saint Floyd of the holy fentanyl overdose.

They can't win legally so they will use intimidation, threats and violence to protect the holy sacrement of baby killing.


A constitutionally protected right, set out in a precedent setting case, is about to be overruled. In an opinion that references Obergfell, Griswold and Loving.

But yeah, the leak is the real story here. Tell me again how autocrats don't control the narrative. And remind me how this grab for government power over women represents limited government.

And all of you that heehawed over Sam and Oso as liberal? Check again.



Since you misrepresent how those cases are mentioned and don't address the limited federal government reasoning behind the decision, perhaps you should read the actual decision (draft as it may be) and figure out just how full of $ # 1 7 you are.


I didn't misrepresent anything, you just can't read anything I post without getting triggered into seeing things that aren't there.

Justice Alito could have reached the exact same legal conclusion without mentioning those cases.
He didn't.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySpeaking said:

Waco1947 said:


I see these type of outbursts every now and then where a slogan is repeated multiple times. Chanting or repeating slogans means you have no rational argument. Repetition is not a criterion of a true statement.




Let's go Brandon.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

Waco1947 said:



What is a woman?
is there a biologist in the thread?!
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"The unborn" are a convenient group of people to advocate for. They never make demands of you; they are morally uncomplicated, unlike the incarcerated, addicted, or the chronically poor; they don't resent your condescension or complain that you are not politically correct; unlike widows, they don't ask you to question patriarchy; unlike orphans, they don't need money, education, or childcare; unlike aliens, they don't bring all that racial, cultural, and religious baggage that you dislike; they allow you to feel good about yourself without any work at creating or maintaining relationships; and when they are born, you can forget about them, because they cease to be unborn. It's almost as if, by being born, they have died to you. You can love the unborn and advocate for them without substantially challenging your own wealth, power, or privilege, without re-imagining social structures, apologizing, or making reparations to anyone. They are, in short, the perfect people to love if you want to claim you love Jesus but actually dislike people who breathe.

Prisoners? Immigrants? The sick? The poor? Widows? Orphans? All the groups that are specifically mentioned in the Bible? They all get thrown under the bus for the unborn.

Dave Barnhart, Alabama Methodist pastor, 2018.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

"The unborn" are a convenient group of people to advocate for. They never make demands of you; they are morally uncomplicated, unlike the incarcerated, addicted, or the chronically poor; they don't resent your condescension or complain that you are not politically correct; unlike widows, they don't ask you to question patriarchy; unlike orphans, they don't need money, education, or childcare; unlike aliens, they don't bring all that racial, cultural, and religious baggage that you dislike; they allow you to feel good about yourself without any work at creating or maintaining relationships; and when they are born, you can forget about them, because they cease to be unborn. It's almost as if, by being born, they have died to you. You can love the unborn and advocate for them without substantially challenging your own wealth, power, or privilege, without re-imagining social structures, apologizing, or making reparations to anyone. They are, in short, the perfect people to love if you want to claim you love Jesus but actually dislike people who breathe.

Prisoners? Immigrants? The sick? The poor? Widows? Orphans? All the groups that are specifically mentioned in the Bible? They all get thrown under the bus for the unborn.

Dave Barnhart, Alabama Methodist pastor, 2018.
Wow, another pastor preaching lies in favor of killing innocent humans. Does he know Waco47?
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

quash said:

"The unborn" are a convenient group of people to advocate for. They never make demands of you; they are morally uncomplicated, unlike the incarcerated, addicted, or the chronically poor; they don't resent your condescension or complain that you are not politically correct; unlike widows, they don't ask you to question patriarchy; unlike orphans, they don't need money, education, or childcare; unlike aliens, they don't bring all that racial, cultural, and religious baggage that you dislike; they allow you to feel good about yourself without any work at creating or maintaining relationships; and when they are born, you can forget about them, because they cease to be unborn. It's almost as if, by being born, they have died to you. You can love the unborn and advocate for them without substantially challenging your own wealth, power, or privilege, without re-imagining social structures, apologizing, or making reparations to anyone. They are, in short, the perfect people to love if you want to claim you love Jesus but actually dislike people who breathe.

Prisoners? Immigrants? The sick? The poor? Widows? Orphans? All the groups that are specifically mentioned in the Bible? They all get thrown under the bus for the unborn.

Dave Barnhart, Alabama Methodist pastor, 2018.
Wow, another pastor preaching lies in favor of killing innocent humans. Does he know Waco47?
both are methodist pastors..
BearlySpeaking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

BearlySpeaking said:

Waco1947 said:


I see these type of outbursts every now and then where a slogan is repeated multiple times. Chanting or repeating slogans means you have no rational argument. Repetition is not a criterion of a true statement.




Let's go Brandon.

"Let's go Brandon" is a joke the media unintentionally started in an interview after a NASCAR race,. If you repeatedly assert that phrase as an argument for a political or moral position then yea, it's in the same camp.
BearlySpeaking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

they are morally uncomplicated...
Yes, killing the defenseless is uncomplicated. We should not kill babies, the mentally handicapped, the severely physically handicapped, all those said by a large number of European scientists and doctors at one point in history to be "useless eaters." They also used a term for these people I've seen used regularly to describe an unborn baby - a "parasite."
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

Wangchung said:

quash said:

"The unborn" are a convenient group of people to advocate for. They never make demands of you; they are morally uncomplicated, unlike the incarcerated, addicted, or the chronically poor; they don't resent your condescension or complain that you are not politically correct; unlike widows, they don't ask you to question patriarchy; unlike orphans, they don't need money, education, or childcare; unlike aliens, they don't bring all that racial, cultural, and religious baggage that you dislike; they allow you to feel good about yourself without any work at creating or maintaining relationships; and when they are born, you can forget about them, because they cease to be unborn. It's almost as if, by being born, they have died to you. You can love the unborn and advocate for them without substantially challenging your own wealth, power, or privilege, without re-imagining social structures, apologizing, or making reparations to anyone. They are, in short, the perfect people to love if you want to claim you love Jesus but actually dislike people who breathe.

Prisoners? Immigrants? The sick? The poor? Widows? Orphans? All the groups that are specifically mentioned in the Bible? They all get thrown under the bus for the unborn.

Dave Barnhart, Alabama Methodist pastor, 2018.
Wow, another pastor preaching lies in favor of killing innocent humans. Does he know Waco47?
both are methodist pastors..
Both are ignorant ****** bags .
Canon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Canon said:

quash said:

ShooterTX said:

No surprise that this got leaked.
The radical left has no respect for anything.
They wanted to leak this so that their minions can take to the streets and rage like they did with Saint Floyd of the holy fentanyl overdose.

They can't win legally so they will use intimidation, threats and violence to protect the holy sacrement of baby killing.


A constitutionally protected right, set out in a precedent setting case, is about to be overruled. In an opinion that references Obergfell, Griswold and Loving.

But yeah, the leak is the real story here. Tell me again how autocrats don't control the narrative. And remind me how this grab for government power over women represents limited government.

And all of you that heehawed over Sam and Oso as liberal? Check again.



Since you misrepresent how those cases are mentioned and don't address the limited federal government reasoning behind the decision, perhaps you should read the actual decision (draft as it may be) and figure out just how full of $ # 1 7 you are.


I didn't misrepresent anything, you just can't read anything I post without getting triggered into seeing things that aren't there.

Justice Alito could have reached the exact same legal conclusion without mentioning those cases.
He didn't.



You completely misrepresented his mention of them. He mentioned them to say:

A. They're next?
B. They won't be affected?

Tell us.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

"The unborn" are a convenient group of people to advocate for. They never make demands of you; they are morally uncomplicated, unlike the incarcerated, addicted, or the chronically poor; they don't resent your condescension or complain that you are not politically correct; unlike widows, they don't ask you to question patriarchy; unlike orphans, they don't need money, education, or childcare; unlike aliens, they don't bring all that racial, cultural, and religious baggage that you dislike; they allow you to feel good about yourself without any work at creating or maintaining relationships; and when they are born, you can forget about them, because they cease to be unborn. It's almost as if, by being born, they have died to you. You can love the unborn and advocate for them without substantially challenging your own wealth, power, or privilege, without re-imagining social structures, apologizing, or making reparations to anyone. They are, in short, the perfect people to love if you want to claim you love Jesus but actually dislike people who breathe.

Prisoners? Immigrants? The sick? The poor? Widows? Orphans? All the groups that are specifically mentioned in the Bible? They all get thrown under the bus for the unborn.

Dave Barnhart, Alabama Methodist pastor, 2018.
There's a lot of truth in this, but I disagree with the bolded. A truly pro-life society would be profoundly different in ways that would threaten liberals and conservatives alike.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

Waco1947 said:



What is a woman?
...and in any event,the laws concern a baby's body, not a woman's body.

Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ephesians 4: 29Let no corrupting talk come out of your mouths, but only such as is good for building up, as fits the occasion, that it may give grace to those who hear.
30 And do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption.
31 Let all bitterness and wrath and anger and clamor and slander be put away from you, along with all malice.
32 Be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you
Waco1947 ,la
ShooterTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Ephesians 4: 29Let no corrupting talk come out of your mouths, but only such as is good for building up, as fits the occasion, that it may give grace to those who hear.
30 And do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption.
31 Let all bitterness and wrath and anger and clamor and slander be put away from you, along with all malice.
32 Be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you


Show me the verse which says it's good to kill babies
ShooterTX
Canon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Ephesians 4: 29Let no corrupting talk come out of your mouths, but only such as is good for building up, as fits the occasion, that it may give grace to those who hear.
30 And do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption.
31 Let all bitterness and wrath and anger and clamor and slander be put away from you, along with all malice.
32 Be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you


" Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You are like whitewashed tombs, which look beautiful on the outside but on the inside are full of the bones of the dead and everything unclean." Matt 23:27
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The dumbest Congressman in office...and that's saying a lot.

4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Luke 6:31 records Jesus saying, "Do to others as you would have them do to you."

Jesus responded, "'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.' This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.' All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments" (Matthew 22:37-40)
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:




Reported for hate speech.

You are such a bigot Waco…men are birthing people too.
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canon said:

Waco1947 said:

Ephesians 4: 29Let no corrupting talk come out of your mouths, but only such as is good for building up, as fits the occasion, that it may give grace to those who hear.
30 And do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption.
31 Let all bitterness and wrath and anger and clamor and slander be put away from you, along with all malice.
32 Be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you


" Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You are like whitewashed tombs, which look beautiful on the outside but on the inside are full of the bones of the dead and everything unclean." Matt 23:27
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Waco1947 said:




Reported for hate speech.

You are such a bigot Waco…men are birthing people too.


I'm literally shaking from the transphobia. Why does this have to be such a hateful place??!!!!
ShooterTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is the reality.
Abortion is murder, and it requires the most sick and demonic to actually perform the act.

Congrats to Waco1947... you are doing the heavy lifting for Satan.


ShooterTX
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ShooterTX said:

This is the reality.
Abortion is murder, and it requires the most sick and demonic to actually perform the act.

Congrats to Waco1947... you are doing the heavy lifting for Satan.



Under his guise of a 'minister' this semi literate hick convinced dozens of women and girls to have an abortion .

Only God knows the guilt and anguish many of these women have had to endure since.



Cheshire Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ShooterTX said:

This is the reality.
Abortion is murder, and it requires the most sick and demonic to actually perform the act.

Congrats to Waco1947... you are doing the heavy lifting for Satan.



LOL This isn't a "Satanic" person. This is a man who is at wit's end from dealing with "protesters" harassing patients coming into his office. A man who can't step outside without having some religious zealot scream insults and inaccuracies at him. He doesn't know what to do anymore, so he just joins in their silly game. Is it immature? Yes. Satanic? Come on, man.

Everybody who disagrees with you isn't "Satanic." This is the reason why young people move further and further away from religion as time progresses.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Waco1947 said:




Reported for hate speech.

You are such a bigot Waco…men are birthing people too.


Why does 47 deny science?

Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looks like 47 has found his hero...

Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Community Organized?
Canon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

Looks like 47 has found his hero...




Made me think of this:

Genesis 19:1 The two angels arrived at Sodom in the evening, and Lot was sitting in the gateway of the city. When he saw them, he got up to meet them and bowed down with his face to the ground. 2 "My lords," he said, "please turn aside to your servant's house. You can wash your feet and spend the night and then go on your way early in the morning."

"No," they answered, "we will spend the night in the square."

3 But he insisted so strongly that they did go with him and entered his house. He prepared a meal for them, baking bread without yeast, and they ate. 4 Before they had gone to bed, all the men from every part of the city of Sodomboth young and oldsurrounded the house. 5 They called to Lot, "Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them."
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.