Roe v. Wade Overruled?

51,902 Views | 701 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by Forest Bueller_bf
Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

ShooterTX said:

quash said:

4th and Inches said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

The leak and associated threats against SCOUTS are exponentially a greater "threat to democracy" than a few idiots vandalizing the Capitol.

Not even close.

attempted assassination of a SCOTUS justice is worse than the jan 6th riots. You and I both know it would fundamentally change the courts opinion on all future cases

Not even close.



Then you truly are a ****ing idiot


You're the obvious idiot. That guy just wanted a tour of Justice Kavanaugh's house, maybe pick up a souvenir laptop, smear some **** on the wall, maybe wave a Confederate flag.



How many of the J6 protestors brought a firearm to the Capitol?

Ah, the "It's not an insurrection if a specific weapon was not used". Classic.



It is not an insurrection if all your doing is trespassing. The weapons or lack there of go to the object of the act. Even the peasants would bring somewhat sufficient tools when they wanted to overthrow the lord of the manor.Trespassing. Huh.

Well, at least you've moved on from "wandering tourists".

Man, I still remember those heady days when this was horrible, even without guns, because it was all Antifa and BLM. How times change.





You draw out another good distinction between the summer 2020 riots and J6. The 2020 riots resulted in arson, damage and destruction of businesses and buildings for several city blocks, and rapes occurred inside some of the "autonomous zones." I don't recall any of the J6 protestors doing anything half that violent.

Such a defense: January sixth was not an insurrection because nobody got raped.

J6 wasn't an insurrection because it was not an insurrection. It does not meet the definition of insurrection. Moreover, it is silly on your part to try to draw a parallel between J6 and summer 2020 riots. The riots were massively worse for everyone than J6 except that some Congressmen and Congresswomen got scared.
I love how deeply you go into Dunning-Kruger mode.

It's not an insurrection because guns. Or rapes. Or failure.

And you completely overlook that it didn't happen on MAGA Tour Day at the the Capitol. Those Congressmen had a very specific job to do that today.

They planned and attempted to carry out the willful disruption of a democratic transfer of power by non-democratic means. Americans are bothered by such things. Usually.

You get all heated up over mail in ballots as an attack on democracy, but fail to recognize an actual one when it gets filmed live. You people amaze me with the depth of your TDS.





Right. And if the Congresscritters had to wait until the next day or certify the election by Zoom, then the government is overthrown. Umm humm.

Rethink your argument, Socrates.
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

ShooterTX said:

quash said:

4th and Inches said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

The leak and associated threats against SCOUTS are exponentially a greater "threat to democracy" than a few idiots vandalizing the Capitol.

Not even close.

attempted assassination of a SCOTUS justice is worse than the jan 6th riots. You and I both know it would fundamentally change the courts opinion on all future cases

Not even close.



Then you truly are a ****ing idiot


You're the obvious idiot. That guy just wanted a tour of Justice Kavanaugh's house, maybe pick up a souvenir laptop, smear some **** on the wall, maybe wave a Confederate flag.



How many of the J6 protestors brought a firearm to the Capitol?

Ah, the "It's not an insurrection if a specific weapon was not used". Classic.



It is not an insurrection if all your doing is trespassing. The weapons or lack there of go to the object of the act. Even the peasants would bring somewhat sufficient tools when they wanted to overthrow the lord of the manor.Trespassing. Huh.

Well, at least you've moved on from "wandering tourists".

Man, I still remember those heady days when this was horrible, even without guns, because it was all Antifa and BLM. How times change.





You draw out another good distinction between the summer 2020 riots and J6. The 2020 riots resulted in arson, damage and destruction of businesses and buildings for several city blocks, and rapes occurred inside some of the "autonomous zones." I don't recall any of the J6 protestors doing anything half that violent.

Such a defense: January sixth was not an insurrection because nobody got raped.

J6 wasn't an insurrection because it was not an insurrection. It does not meet the definition of insurrection. Moreover, it is silly on your part to try to draw a parallel between J6 and summer 2020 riots. The riots were massively worse for everyone than J6 except that some Congressmen and Congresswomen got scared.
I love how deeply you go into Dunning-Kruger mode.

It's not an insurrection because guns. Or rapes. Or failure.

And you completely overlook that it didn't happen on MAGA Tour Day at the the Capitol. Those Congressmen had a very specific job to do that today.

They planned and attempted to carry out the willful disruption of a democratic transfer of power by non-democratic means. Americans are bothered by such things. Usually.

You get all heated up over mail in ballots as an attack on democracy, but fail to recognize an actual one when it gets filmed live. You people amaze me with the depth of your TDS.





Right. And if the Congresscritters had to wait until the next day or certify the election by Zoom, then the government is overthrown. Umm humm.

Rethink your argument, Socrates.

Oh please. If anything connected to that election happened by Zoom you'd have been told to have a conniption. And you would have complied.

“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quash will pretend J6 was something worse than a protest with a few bad applies, because the alternative is to try and defend Biden, Pelosi, Schumer, and the rest of the vermin running DC right now.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

ShooterTX said:

quash said:

4th and Inches said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

The leak and associated threats against SCOUTS are exponentially a greater "threat to democracy" than a few idiots vandalizing the Capitol.

Not even close.

attempted assassination of a SCOTUS justice is worse than the jan 6th riots. You and I both know it would fundamentally change the courts opinion on all future cases

Not even close.



Then you truly are a ****ing idiot


You're the obvious idiot. That guy just wanted a tour of Justice Kavanaugh's house, maybe pick up a souvenir laptop, smear some **** on the wall, maybe wave a Confederate flag.



How many of the J6 protestors brought a firearm to the Capitol?

Ah, the "It's not an insurrection if a specific weapon was not used". Classic.



It is not an insurrection if all your doing is trespassing. The weapons or lack there of go to the object of the act. Even the peasants would bring somewhat sufficient tools when they wanted to overthrow the lord of the manor.Trespassing. Huh.

Well, at least you've moved on from "wandering tourists".

Man, I still remember those heady days when this was horrible, even without guns, because it was all Antifa and BLM. How times change.





You draw out another good distinction between the summer 2020 riots and J6. The 2020 riots resulted in arson, damage and destruction of businesses and buildings for several city blocks, and rapes occurred inside some of the "autonomous zones." I don't recall any of the J6 protestors doing anything half that violent.

Such a defense: January sixth was not an insurrection because nobody got raped.

J6 wasn't an insurrection because it was not an insurrection. It does not meet the definition of insurrection. Moreover, it is silly on your part to try to draw a parallel between J6 and summer 2020 riots. The riots were massively worse for everyone than J6 except that some Congressmen and Congresswomen got scared.
I love how deeply you go into Dunning-Kruger mode.

It's not an insurrection because guns. Or rapes. Or failure.

And you completely overlook that it didn't happen on MAGA Tour Day at the the Capitol. Those Congressmen had a very specific job to do that today.

They planned and attempted to carry out the willful disruption of a democratic transfer of power by non-democratic means. Americans are bothered by such things. Usually.

You get all heated up over mail in ballots as an attack on democracy, but fail to recognize an actual one when it gets filmed live. You people amaze me with the depth of your TDS.





Right. And if the Congresscritters had to wait until the next day or certify the election by Zoom, then the government is overthrown. Umm humm.

Rethink your argument, Socrates.

Of please. If anything connected to that election happened by Zoom you'd have been told to have a conniption. And you would have complied.


Uh, nope. Congress had been meeting and voting by remote means for months. You silly boy.
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

ShooterTX said:

quash said:

4th and Inches said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

The leak and associated threats against SCOUTS are exponentially a greater "threat to democracy" than a few idiots vandalizing the Capitol.

Not even close.

attempted assassination of a SCOTUS justice is worse than the jan 6th riots. You and I both know it would fundamentally change the courts opinion on all future cases

Not even close.



Then you truly are a ****ing idiot


You're the obvious idiot. That guy just wanted a tour of Justice Kavanaugh's house, maybe pick up a souvenir laptop, smear some **** on the wall, maybe wave a Confederate flag.



How many of the J6 protestors brought a firearm to the Capitol?

Ah, the "It's not an insurrection if a specific weapon was not used". Classic.



It is not an insurrection if all your doing is trespassing. The weapons or lack there of go to the object of the act. Even the peasants would bring somewhat sufficient tools when they wanted to overthrow the lord of the manor.Trespassing. Huh.

Well, at least you've moved on from "wandering tourists".

Man, I still remember those heady days when this was horrible, even without guns, because it was all Antifa and BLM. How times change.





You draw out another good distinction between the summer 2020 riots and J6. The 2020 riots resulted in arson, damage and destruction of businesses and buildings for several city blocks, and rapes occurred inside some of the "autonomous zones." I don't recall any of the J6 protestors doing anything half that violent.

Such a defense: January sixth was not an insurrection because nobody got raped.

J6 wasn't an insurrection because it was not an insurrection. It does not meet the definition of insurrection. Moreover, it is silly on your part to try to draw a parallel between J6 and summer 2020 riots. The riots were massively worse for everyone than J6 except that some Congressmen and Congresswomen got scared.
I love how deeply you go into Dunning-Kruger mode.

It's not an insurrection because guns. Or rapes. Or failure.

And you completely overlook that it didn't happen on MAGA Tour Day at the the Capitol. Those Congressmen had a very specific job to do that today.

They planned and attempted to carry out the willful disruption of a democratic transfer of power by non-democratic means. Americans are bothered by such things. Usually.

You get all heated up over mail in ballots as an attack on democracy, but fail to recognize an actual one when it gets filmed live. You people amaze me with the depth of your TDS.





Right. And if the Congresscritters had to wait until the next day or certify the election by Zoom, then the government is overthrown. Umm humm.

Rethink your argument, Socrates.

Of please. If anything connected to that election happened by Zoom you'd have been told to have a conniption. And you would have complied.


Uh, nope. Congress had been meeting and voting by remote means for months. You silly boy.

Not for electors. Read your Constitution.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Quash will pretend J6 was something worse than a protest with a few bad applies, because the alternative is to try and defend Biden, Pelosi, Schumer, and the rest of the vermin running DC right now.
Not really.
Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

ShooterTX said:

quash said:

4th and Inches said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

The leak and associated threats against SCOUTS are exponentially a greater "threat to democracy" than a few idiots vandalizing the Capitol.

Not even close.

attempted assassination of a SCOTUS justice is worse than the jan 6th riots. You and I both know it would fundamentally change the courts opinion on all future cases

Not even close.



Then you truly are a ****ing idiot


You're the obvious idiot. That guy just wanted a tour of Justice Kavanaugh's house, maybe pick up a souvenir laptop, smear some **** on the wall, maybe wave a Confederate flag.



How many of the J6 protestors brought a firearm to the Capitol?

Ah, the "It's not an insurrection if a specific weapon was not used". Classic.



It is not an insurrection if all your doing is trespassing. The weapons or lack there of go to the object of the act. Even the peasants would bring somewhat sufficient tools when they wanted to overthrow the lord of the manor.Trespassing. Huh.

Well, at least you've moved on from "wandering tourists".

Man, I still remember those heady days when this was horrible, even without guns, because it was all Antifa and BLM. How times change.





You draw out another good distinction between the summer 2020 riots and J6. The 2020 riots resulted in arson, damage and destruction of businesses and buildings for several city blocks, and rapes occurred inside some of the "autonomous zones." I don't recall any of the J6 protestors doing anything half that violent.

Such a defense: January sixth was not an insurrection because nobody got raped.

J6 wasn't an insurrection because it was not an insurrection. It does not meet the definition of insurrection. Moreover, it is silly on your part to try to draw a parallel between J6 and summer 2020 riots. The riots were massively worse for everyone than J6 except that some Congressmen and Congresswomen got scared.
I love how deeply you go into Dunning-Kruger mode.

It's not an insurrection because guns. Or rapes. Or failure.

And you completely overlook that it didn't happen on MAGA Tour Day at the the Capitol. Those Congressmen had a very specific job to do that today.

They planned and attempted to carry out the willful disruption of a democratic transfer of power by non-democratic means. Americans are bothered by such things. Usually.

You get all heated up over mail in ballots as an attack on democracy, but fail to recognize an actual one when it gets filmed live. You people amaze me with the depth of your TDS.





Right. And if the Congresscritters had to wait until the next day or certify the election by Zoom, then the government is overthrown. Umm humm.

Rethink your argument, Socrates.

Of please. If anything connected to that election happened by Zoom you'd have been told to have a conniption. And you would have complied.


Uh, nope. Congress had been meeting and voting by remote means for months. You silly boy.

Not for electors. Read your Constitution.


I know what you meant. Covid suspended the Constitution. The government can infringe on your rights, impair contracts, do takings without compensation, and operate however it wants because scary virus. Where have you been the last two and half years?
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Rawhide said:

quash said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

ShooterTX said:

quash said:

4th and Inches said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

The leak and associated threats against SCOUTS are exponentially a greater "threat to democracy" than a few idiots vandalizing the Capitol.

Not even close.

attempted assassination of a SCOTUS justice is worse than the jan 6th riots. You and I both know it would fundamentally change the courts opinion on all future cases

Not even close.



Then you truly are a ****ing idiot


You're the obvious idiot. That guy just wanted a tour of Justice Kavanaugh's house, maybe pick up a souvenir laptop, smear some **** on the wall, maybe wave a Confederate flag.



How many of the J6 protestors brought a firearm to the Capitol?
Michael Byrd sure as He'll had a firearm! Ashley Babbitt did not. And somehow this is acceptable to the Loony Left.

Lawful force was used against a criminal. Somehow this is offensive to the radical right.

Thought you were against the state killing people with impunity

I am. This was an officer shooting a criminal in the middle of a crime. Hardly impunity.

So then you support officers that shoot black people when they're in the middle of a crime, especially when the person of color is unarmed?
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

ShooterTX said:

quash said:

4th and Inches said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

The leak and associated threats against SCOUTS are exponentially a greater "threat to democracy" than a few idiots vandalizing the Capitol.

Not even close.

attempted assassination of a SCOTUS justice is worse than the jan 6th riots. You and I both know it would fundamentally change the courts opinion on all future cases

Not even close.



Then you truly are a ****ing idiot


You're the obvious idiot. That guy just wanted a tour of Justice Kavanaugh's house, maybe pick up a souvenir laptop, smear some **** on the wall, maybe wave a Confederate flag.



How many of the J6 protestors brought a firearm to the Capitol?

Ah, the "It's not an insurrection if a specific weapon was not used". Classic.



It is not an insurrection if all your doing is trespassing. The weapons or lack there of go to the object of the act. Even the peasants would bring somewhat sufficient tools when they wanted to overthrow the lord of the manor.Trespassing. Huh.

Well, at least you've moved on from "wandering tourists".

Man, I still remember those heady days when this was horrible, even without guns, because it was all Antifa and BLM. How times change.





You draw out another good distinction between the summer 2020 riots and J6. The 2020 riots resulted in arson, damage and destruction of businesses and buildings for several city blocks, and rapes occurred inside some of the "autonomous zones." I don't recall any of the J6 protestors doing anything half that violent.

Such a defense: January sixth was not an insurrection because nobody got raped.

J6 wasn't an insurrection because it was not an insurrection. It does not meet the definition of insurrection. Moreover, it is silly on your part to try to draw a parallel between J6 and summer 2020 riots. The riots were massively worse for everyone than J6 except that some Congressmen and Congresswomen got scared.
I don't even think they were that scared. The pelosis and such got exaclty what they hoped for. Talking points for a few years
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

ShooterTX said:

quash said:

4th and Inches said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

The leak and associated threats against SCOUTS are exponentially a greater "threat to democracy" than a few idiots vandalizing the Capitol.

Not even close.

attempted assassination of a SCOTUS justice is worse than the jan 6th riots. You and I both know it would fundamentally change the courts opinion on all future cases

Not even close.



Then you truly are a ****ing idiot


You're the obvious idiot. That guy just wanted a tour of Justice Kavanaugh's house, maybe pick up a souvenir laptop, smear some **** on the wall, maybe wave a Confederate flag.



How many of the J6 protestors brought a firearm to the Capitol?

Ah, the "It's not an insurrection if a specific weapon was not used". Classic.



It is not an insurrection if all your doing is trespassing. The weapons or lack there of go to the object of the act. Even the peasants would bring somewhat sufficient tools when they wanted to overthrow the lord of the manor.Trespassing. Huh.

Well, at least you've moved on from "wandering tourists".

Man, I still remember those heady days when this was horrible, even without guns, because it was all Antifa and BLM. How times change.





You draw out another good distinction between the summer 2020 riots and J6. The 2020 riots resulted in arson, damage and destruction of businesses and buildings for several city blocks, and rapes occurred inside some of the "autonomous zones." I don't recall any of the J6 protestors doing anything half that violent.

Such a defense: January sixth was not an insurrection because nobody got raped.

No one was armed. Name one insurrection in history where nobody had a weapon.
Sure they were.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:


Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:



You're the obvious idiot. That guy just wanted a tour of Justice Kavanaugh's house, maybe pick up a souvenir laptop, smear some **** on the wall, maybe wave a Confederate flag.



How many of the J6 protestors brought a firearm to the Capitol?

Ah, the "It's not an insurrection if a specific weapon was not used". Classic.



It is not an insurrection if all your doing is trespassing. The weapons or lack there of go to the object of the act. Even the peasants would bring somewhat sufficient tools when they wanted to overthrow the lord of the manor.Trespassing. Huh.

Well, at least you've moved on from "wandering tourists".

Man, I still remember those heady days when this was horrible, even without guns, because it was all Antifa and BLM. How times change.





You draw out another good distinction between the summer 2020 riots and J6. The 2020 riots resulted in arson, damage and destruction of businesses and buildings for several city blocks, and rapes occurred inside some of the "autonomous zones." I don't recall any of the J6 protestors doing anything half that violent.

Such a defense: January sixth was not an insurrection because nobody got raped.

No one was armed. Name one insurrection in history where nobody had a weapon.
Sure they were.
LOL. He got you, Sam.

There has never in history been an insurrection where nobody had a weapon.
The government is always armed.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Oldbear83 said:

Quash will pretend J6 was something worse than a protest with a few bad applies, because the alternative is to try and defend Biden, Pelosi, Schumer, and the rest of the vermin running DC right now.
Not really.
Oh yes you are. Kinda obvious,too.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rawhide said:

quash said:

Rawhide said:

quash said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

ShooterTX said:

quash said:

4th and Inches said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

The leak and associated threats against SCOUTS are exponentially a greater "threat to democracy" than a few idiots vandalizing the Capitol.

Not even close.

attempted assassination of a SCOTUS justice is worse than the jan 6th riots. You and I both know it would fundamentally change the courts opinion on all future cases

Not even close.



Then you truly are a ****ing idiot


You're the obvious idiot. That guy just wanted a tour of Justice Kavanaugh's house, maybe pick up a souvenir laptop, smear some **** on the wall, maybe wave a Confederate flag.



How many of the J6 protestors brought a firearm to the Capitol?
Michael Byrd sure as He'll had a firearm! Ashley Babbitt did not. And somehow this is acceptable to the Loony Left.

Lawful force was used against a criminal. Somehow this is offensive to the radical right.

Thought you were against the state killing people with impunity

I am. This was an officer shooting a criminal in the middle of a crime. Hardly impunity.

So then you support officers that shoot black people when they're in the middle of a crime, especially when the person of color is unarmed?

I support looking at each case separately. Most officer involved shootings are legit. Like this one. When they are not you have heard from me.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Rawhide said:

quash said:

Rawhide said:

quash said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

ShooterTX said:

quash said:

4th and Inches said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

The leak and associated threats against SCOUTS are exponentially a greater "threat to democracy" than a few idiots vandalizing the Capitol.

Not even close.

attempted assassination of a SCOTUS justice is worse than the jan 6th riots. You and I both know it would fundamentally change the courts opinion on all future cases

Not even close.



Then you truly are a ****ing idiot


You're the obvious idiot. That guy just wanted a tour of Justice Kavanaugh's house, maybe pick up a souvenir laptop, smear some **** on the wall, maybe wave a Confederate flag.



How many of the J6 protestors brought a firearm to the Capitol?
Michael Byrd sure as He'll had a firearm! Ashley Babbitt did not. And somehow this is acceptable to the Loony Left.

Lawful force was used against a criminal. Somehow this is offensive to the radical right.

Thought you were against the state killing people with impunity

I am. This was an officer shooting a criminal in the middle of a crime. Hardly impunity.

So then you support officers that shoot black people when they're in the middle of a crime, especially when the person of color is unarmed?

I support looking at each case separately. Most officer involved shootings are legit. Like this one. When they are not you have heard from me.

Rayshard Brooks?
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rawhide said:

quash said:

Rawhide said:

quash said:

Rawhide said:

quash said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Amal Shuq-Up said:

quash said:

ShooterTX said:

quash said:

4th and Inches said:

quash said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

The leak and associated threats against SCOUTS are exponentially a greater "threat to democracy" than a few idiots vandalizing the Capitol.

Not even close.

attempted assassination of a SCOTUS justice is worse than the jan 6th riots. You and I both know it would fundamentally change the courts opinion on all future cases

Not even close.



Then you truly are a ****ing idiot


You're the obvious idiot. That guy just wanted a tour of Justice Kavanaugh's house, maybe pick up a souvenir laptop, smear some **** on the wall, maybe wave a Confederate flag.



How many of the J6 protestors brought a firearm to the Capitol?
Michael Byrd sure as He'll had a firearm! Ashley Babbitt did not. And somehow this is acceptable to the Loony Left.

Lawful force was used against a criminal. Somehow this is offensive to the radical right.

Thought you were against the state killing people with impunity

I am. This was an officer shooting a criminal in the middle of a crime. Hardly impunity.

So then you support officers that shoot black people when they're in the middle of a crime, especially when the person of color is unarmed?

I support looking at each case separately. Most officer involved shootings are legit. Like this one. When they are not you have heard from me.

Rayshard Brooks?

Let's see what comes out in Rolfe's trial. But so far it looks like they shot him while he was evading arrest.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cobretti said:


Perhaps if they pulled a Lysistrata. Everyone wins.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A little bird told me there's a high probability they're striking Roe tomorrow.
Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

A little bird told me there's a high probability they're striking Roe tomorrow.
Ruth was is no longer here.
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

A little bird told me there's a high probability they're striking Roe tomorrow.
prepare your corn!

- kkm

{ sipping coffee }

{ eating donut }

arbyscoin - the only crypto you can eat.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
william said:

Doc Holliday said:

A little bird told me there's a high probability they're striking Roe tomorrow.
prepare your corn!

- kkm

{ sipping coffee }

{ eating donut }


william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
clarence's mama dinst raised no fool...........

- kkm
arbyscoin - the only crypto you can eat.
ABC BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sitting here listening to Takin' It To The Streets while contemplating all this nonsense.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

A little bird told me there's a high probability they're striking Roe tomorrow.


FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh crap. Here we go. Abortion will dominate everything. So much for this country ever getting anything done.
Now we have to go through, packing the Courts. Getting rid of the filibuster to do it.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They will have to try and codify Roe v. Wade again. they won't have the votes to pack the court or stop Filabuster..
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:


Massachusetts just claimed that abortion is legal until the 18th birthday...
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"let justice roll on like a river..."



Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RMF5630 said:

Redbrickbear said:


Massachusetts just claimed that abortion is legal until the 18th birthday...
Massachusetts soon to have the most polite teenage population in the entire history of the US.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

RMF5630 said:

Redbrickbear said:


Massachusetts just claimed that abortion is legal until the 18th birthday...
Massachusetts soon to have the most polite teenage population in the entire history of the US.
Sociologist fearful the 14-19 age group will cease to exist in Mass. Can enough make it through without pissing off their parents. Unindented consequence Mass having to import 19 year olds...
Johnny Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great day for the Constitution.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnny Bear said:

Great day for the Constitution.
Also a great day for Humanity.
Forest Bueller_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:



Quote:

The state's Republican leadership has long sought to ban abortions, but Roe v. Wade has kept lawmakers from doing so. With that 49-year-old case now overturned, a trigger law will go into effect in the coming weeks that bans all abortions from the moment of fertilization, except in rare cases to save the life of a pregnant patient or prevent "substantial impairment of major bodily function."
Chipoople
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller_bf said:

Redbrickbear said:



Quote:

The state's Republican leadership has long sought to ban abortions, but Roe v. Wade has kept lawmakers from doing so. With that 49-year-old case now overturned, a trigger law will go into effect in the coming weeks that bans all abortions from the moment of fertilization, except in rare cases to save the life of a pregnant patient or prevent "substantial impairment of major bodily function."



Does that include ectopic pregnancies? Because statistically speaking they are not rare at all.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.