This week Bill Maher learned European countries have far more restrictive abortion laws than we do in America and that women report being pro-life more often than men. How many people have no clue about this or about fetal pain science? If they did, some might change. pic.twitter.com/8RjUXtrbVX
— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) May 8, 2022
Roe v. Wade Overruled?
50,376 Views |
701 Replies |
Last: 3 yr ago by Forest Bueller_bf
Cobretti said:The White House refused to condemn this. https://t.co/ByXXKAysQj
— Nathan Brand (@NathanBrandWA) May 8, 2022
18 USC 1507:
Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
Nothing in this section shall interfere with or prevent the exercise by any court of the United States of its power to punish for contempt.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1507
yeah, good luck with that out of a Biden DOJJXL said:Cobretti said:The White House refused to condemn this. https://t.co/ByXXKAysQj
— Nathan Brand (@NathanBrandWA) May 8, 2022
18 USC 1507:
Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
Nothing in this section shall interfere with or prevent the exercise by any court of the United States of its power to punish for contempt.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1507
Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) today accused the conservative justices of lying under oath and crossing "a line that no one believed would be crossed." The allegation that these justices lied during their confirmations is utter nonsense. https://t.co/h8ccGTjD0r
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) May 8, 2022
I have witnessed this on a couple of podcasts by left-wing, pro-abortion talking heads. They seems completely flummoxed that Europe has much more restrictive abortion laws than the U.S. This is like so many issues where the extremists control the narrative. A European-style law likely could have passed, but the pro-abortion radicals will only settle for fourth trimester abortion.Cobretti said:This week Bill Maher learned European countries have far more restrictive abortion laws than we do in America and that women report being pro-life more often than men. How many people have no clue about this or about fetal pain science? If they did, some might change. pic.twitter.com/8RjUXtrbVX
— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) May 8, 2022
JXL said:Cobretti said:The White House refused to condemn this. https://t.co/ByXXKAysQj
— Nathan Brand (@NathanBrandWA) May 8, 2022
18 USC 1507:
Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
Nothing in this section shall interfere with or prevent the exercise by any court of the United States of its power to punish for contempt.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1507
Unfortunately, the DOJ is made up of lawyers and not home builders so they don't know what a residence is. Otherwise, Garland might be able to enforce the law.
tell the justices to go hang out at school board meetings, the DOJ is monitoring those placesAmal Shuq-Up said:JXL said:Cobretti said:The White House refused to condemn this. https://t.co/ByXXKAysQj
— Nathan Brand (@NathanBrandWA) May 8, 2022
18 USC 1507:
Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
Nothing in this section shall interfere with or prevent the exercise by any court of the United States of its power to punish for contempt.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1507
Unfortunately, the DOJ is made up of lawyers and not home builders so they don't know what a residence is. Otherwise, Garland might be able to enforce the law.
REALITY CHECK: Women’s fear of being unable to get baby formula will affect the vote this fall far more than women’s fear of being unable to get an abortion.
— Allie Beth Stuckey (@conservmillen) May 9, 2022
Just read a stat: 80% if US are pro-choice, a supermajotity. Saying because of that Roe should not be overturned.
I disagree, that has nothi to do with law. If there truly is a Supermsjority, pass an amendment. Pass abortion rights in State law. That is where it should be determined, not by court case.
Similarly to Obamas Stanford speech, all the "code" patches he listed when comparing Constitution to computer code were Amendments or laws. Pass the laws, let Congress and Legislatures do their jobs, not Courts.
I disagree, that has nothi to do with law. If there truly is a Supermsjority, pass an amendment. Pass abortion rights in State law. That is where it should be determined, not by court case.
Similarly to Obamas Stanford speech, all the "code" patches he listed when comparing Constitution to computer code were Amendments or laws. Pass the laws, let Congress and Legislatures do their jobs, not Courts.
polls are all about how one asks the question. If one asks "do you support overturning Roe?" one gets a strong "no" number. That's because Dems have very effectively portrayed "overturning Roe" as "outlawing abortion."RMF5630 said:
Just read a stat: 80% if US are pro-choice, a supermajotity. Saying because of that Roe should not be overturned.
I disagree, that has nothi to do with law. If there truly is a Supermsjority, pass an amendment. Pass abortion rights in State law. That is where it should be determined, not by court case.
Similarly to Obamas Stanford speech, all the "code" patches he listed when comparing Constitution to computer code were Amendments or laws. Pass the laws, let Congress and Legislatures do their jobs, not Courts.
If one asks "do you believe abortion should only be allowed in situations involving rape, incest, or life of mother?" one gets a very strong "yes" number. That speaks to the fact that pro-lifers have won the argument that abortion is morally wrong and should not be just another form of birth control.
Looking at all polls/all ways, what we see is that about 55-60% of the public supports abortion law MORE restrictive than Roe, and that the support for restrictions rises as high as 85% as the length of term of the pregnancy increases. That's why the release of the draft opinion had almost no impact on polling on the coming election. The pro-life crowd has won the moral argument on the issue. As states start passing laws that fit public opinion within their jurisdiction, the issue should wane quite a bit, becoming mostly a part of feminist litany. And given that Democrats are still welded to the social justice boilerplate, feminist issues will tend to divide their base.
men can have abortions, too, dagnabbit!
Post the poll, i havent seen a single poll that supports Roe v Wade. Most are about 50/50 leaning towards the SCOTUS decision of overturning it.
No poll I have seen shows it at as top concern of the people.
No poll I have seen shows it at as top concern of the people.
this one is fairly typical of the genre.4th and Inches said:
Post the poll, i havent seen a single poll that supports Roe v Wade. Most are about 50/50 leaning towards the SCOTUS decision of overturning it.
No poll I have seen shows it at as top concern of the people.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/04/poll-roe-v-wade-00029889
It was quoted in a Fox News Opinion piece. My point is even if true, allowing "bad law" is not the answer. The Supreme Court is to evaluate policy against the laws of the land, Roe is bad law. It is the Legislature's job to write the law.4th and Inches said:
Post the poll, i havent seen a single poll that supports Roe v Wade. Most are about 50/50 leaning towards the SCOTUS decision of overturning it.
No poll I have seen shows it at as top concern of the people.
If the Legislature (elected representatives of the people) want to abortion to be a right, the remedy is to follow the legislative process and pass either an Amendment at the Federal level or State law at the State level.
I am not going to get into the morals or mores of the actual act. I am not for abortion and believe Fathers and Grandparents have gotten screwed in this whole deal. But, that is not how you get policy done. Put it to the people, we are a representative Republic.
agreed, all laws should arise out of congress or the state legislatures.RMF5630 said:It was quoted in a Fox News Opinion piece. My point is even if true, allowing "bad law" is not the answer. The Supreme Court is to evaluate policy against the laws of the land, Roe is bad law. It is the Legislature's job to write the law.4th and Inches said:
Post the poll, i havent seen a single poll that supports Roe v Wade. Most are about 50/50 leaning towards the SCOTUS decision of overturning it.
No poll I have seen shows it at as top concern of the people.
If the Legislature (elected representatives of the people) want to abortion to be a right, the remedy is to follow the legislative process and pass either an Amendment at the Federal level or State law at the State level.
I am not going to get into the morals or mores of the actual act. I am not for abortion and believe Fathers and Grandparents have gotten screwed in this whole deal. But, that is not how you get policy done. Put it to the people, we are a representative Republic.
100%. It is frustrating we do not have talking heads, "journalists," and politicians that can think complexly and understand nuance. One can both be pro-abortion and acknowledge this is not a federal issue and certainly now one for the courts to make laws.RMF5630 said:
Just read a stat: 80% if US are pro-choice, a supermajotity. Saying because of that Roe should not be overturned.
I disagree, that has nothi to do with law. If there truly is a Supermsjority, pass an amendment. Pass abortion rights in State law. That is where it should be determined, not by court case.
Similarly to Obamas Stanford speech, all the "code" patches he listed when comparing Constitution to computer code were Amendments or laws. Pass the laws, let Congress and Legislatures do their jobs, not Courts.
As I stated before, if abortion is overwhelmingly popular, then every state will pass a law that allows it. The reality is some abortion is favored but not the extreme positions, and as we know the Democrat Party is run by the extremists, so something like a 15-week provision would never pass Democrat muster.
I agree with the other posters that 99% of poll respondents really do not understand the question. There is a wide gap between those that support limited abortion and those that want fourth trimester abortion.
New York Times Apologizes After Wordle of the Day Is 'Fetus' https://t.co/oQxTQEAkpp pic.twitter.com/JyBu89MCme
— Gizmodo (@Gizmodo) May 9, 2022
— mallen2010 (@mallen_2010) May 9, 2022
Women: "Can I have birth control?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: "I couldn't get birth control so I got pregnant. Can I have an abortion?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: Can I have prenatal and post natal healthcare that I can afford?
Republicans: No
Women: Can I have affordable labor and birth care?
Republicans: No
Women: "I had the baby, but I'm out of work. Can I have WIC and food stamps until I get back on my feet?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: I found a job but it doesn't pay a livable wage. Can I have a $15 minimum wage.
Republicans: No
Women: "I found a job, but it doesn't offer me insurance. Can I have government guaranteed insurance?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: "My kid got sick and I got fired because I missed time caring for him. Can I get unemployment?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: "I'm having a hard time getting my kid from school consistently. Can we fund after-school programs?"
Republicans: "No."
Republicans: "No."
Women: "I couldn't get birth control so I got pregnant. Can I have an abortion?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: Can I have prenatal and post natal healthcare that I can afford?
Republicans: No
Women: Can I have affordable labor and birth care?
Republicans: No
Women: "I had the baby, but I'm out of work. Can I have WIC and food stamps until I get back on my feet?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: I found a job but it doesn't pay a livable wage. Can I have a $15 minimum wage.
Republicans: No
Women: "I found a job, but it doesn't offer me insurance. Can I have government guaranteed insurance?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: "My kid got sick and I got fired because I missed time caring for him. Can I get unemployment?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: "I'm having a hard time getting my kid from school consistently. Can we fund after-school programs?"
Republicans: "No."
Waco1947 ,la
Politico By a nearly 2-to-1 margin, voters oppose overturning Roe v. Wade, according to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll conducted immediately after POLITICO published a draft opinion from the Supreme Court that would eviscerate the 1973 precedent guaranteeing federal abortion rights.
Half of voters (50 percent) say Roe v. Wade should not be overturned more than the 28 percent who say it should be overturned. More than 2-in-10 voters, 22 percent, are undecided, according to the poll.
Half of voters (50 percent) say Roe v. Wade should not be overturned more than the 28 percent who say it should be overturned. More than 2-in-10 voters, 22 percent, are undecided, according to the poll.
Waco1947 ,la
Sixty-six percent say Roe v. Wade should not be completely struck down, and 59% would support Congress passing legislation to establish a nationwide right to abortion, including 81% of Democrats, 65% of independents and 30% of Republicans, the survey finds.
CNN
CNN
Waco1947 ,la
People Who Make Bad Decisions: "Can I have others pay for my bad decisions?Waco1947 said:
Women: "Can I have birth control?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: "I couldn't get birth control so I got pregnant. Can I have an abortion?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: Can I have prenatal and post natal healthcare that I can afford?
Republicans: No
Women: Can I have affordable labor and birth care?
Republicans: No
Women: "I had the baby, but I'm out of work. Can I have WIC and food stamps until I get back on my feet?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: I found a job but it doesn't pay a livable wage. Can I have a $15 minimum wage.
Republicans: No
Women: "I found a job, but it doesn't offer me insurance. Can I have government guaranteed insurance?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: "My kid got sick and I got fired because I missed time caring for him. Can I get unemployment?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: "I'm having a hard time getting my kid from school consistently. Can we fund after-school programs?"
Republicans: "No."
Democrats: "Yes. Vote for us. We will transfer the burdens and expenses of your decisions on to others."
Birth control is illegal???
Does anyone really know a woman as helpless as Waco1947's caricature? I understand that is the official Democrat party view of women, but I have never actually met a woman that helpless in real life.Jack Bauer said:
Birth control is illegal???
Our pastor (to my great surprise) addressed the abortion topic in his sermon yesterday. One of the main takeaways was to say that if we as Christians want for there to be fewer abortions or for abortions to go away, then we as Christians have to make women feel confident that they will not be alone and will have support in all different ways from their community.Amal Shuq-Up said:People Who Make Bad Decisions: "Can I have others pay for my bad decisions?Waco1947 said:
Women: "Can I have birth control?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: "I couldn't get birth control so I got pregnant. Can I have an abortion?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: Can I have prenatal and post natal healthcare that I can afford?
Republicans: No
Women: Can I have affordable labor and birth care?
Republicans: No
Women: "I had the baby, but I'm out of work. Can I have WIC and food stamps until I get back on my feet?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: I found a job but it doesn't pay a livable wage. Can I have a $15 minimum wage.
Republicans: No
Women: "I found a job, but it doesn't offer me insurance. Can I have government guaranteed insurance?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: "My kid got sick and I got fired because I missed time caring for him. Can I get unemployment?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: "I'm having a hard time getting my kid from school consistently. Can we fund after-school programs?"
Republicans: "No."
Democrats: "Yes. Vote for us. We will transfer the burdens and expenses of your decisions on to others."
Might actually have been one of the best sermons I've heard this pastor give.
There are more crisis pregnancy centers than unPlanned Parenthood surgical abortion facilities. These centers give the women options to abortion, help them apply for financial assistance, and counsel them. Did your pastor care to tell the congregation that help is actually available to women?90sBear said:Our pastor (to my great surprise) addressed the abortion topic in his sermon yesterday. One of the main takeaways was to say that if we as Christians want for there to be fewer abortions or for abortions to go away, then we as Christians have to make women feel confident that they will not be alone and will have support in all different ways from their community.Amal Shuq-Up said:People Who Make Bad Decisions: "Can I have others pay for my bad decisions?Waco1947 said:
Women: "Can I have birth control?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: "I couldn't get birth control so I got pregnant. Can I have an abortion?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: Can I have prenatal and post natal healthcare that I can afford?
Republicans: No
Women: Can I have affordable labor and birth care?
Republicans: No
Women: "I had the baby, but I'm out of work. Can I have WIC and food stamps until I get back on my feet?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: I found a job but it doesn't pay a livable wage. Can I have a $15 minimum wage.
Republicans: No
Women: "I found a job, but it doesn't offer me insurance. Can I have government guaranteed insurance?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: "My kid got sick and I got fired because I missed time caring for him. Can I get unemployment?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: "I'm having a hard time getting my kid from school consistently. Can we fund after-school programs?"
Republicans: "No."
Democrats: "Yes. Vote for us. We will transfer the burdens and expenses of your decisions on to others."
Might actually have been one of the best sermons I've heard this pastor give.
https://www.pregnancyandchildren.com/pregnancy/pregnancy_assistance.htm
Waco47 doesn't pay his own way .Amal Shuq-Up said:People Who Make Bad Decisions: "Can I have others pay for my bad decisions?Waco1947 said:
Women: "Can I have birth control?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: "I couldn't get birth control so I got pregnant. Can I have an abortion?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: Can I have prenatal and post natal healthcare that I can afford?
Republicans: No
Women: Can I have affordable labor and birth care?
Republicans: No
Women: "I had the baby, but I'm out of work. Can I have WIC and food stamps until I get back on my feet?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: I found a job but it doesn't pay a livable wage. Can I have a $15 minimum wage.
Republicans: No
Women: "I found a job, but it doesn't offer me insurance. Can I have government guaranteed insurance?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: "My kid got sick and I got fired because I missed time caring for him. Can I get unemployment?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: "I'm having a hard time getting my kid from school consistently. Can we fund after-school programs?"
Republicans: "No."
Democrats: "Yes. Vote for us. We will transfer the burdens and expenses of your decisions on to others."
Little wonder he is such a Dem .
Not that simple, complex issue still a woman's body and she has a right to make that descion. Maybe all the superstitious self righteous folks out there should spend their time trying to help the 500,000 kids under the age of 5 that die from disease and starvation instead of standing outside clinics holding a sign thinking they're the judge etc. No issue is black and white. Try to be less judgemental and more open to learning and understanding all points of view. It will take you out of the dark. I see both sides of this issue but lean towards the individual. Sometimes talking to christians is like talking to flat earthers they ignore all the evidence that we have today that shows religion all faiths are simply man-made ideas to give themselves Hope of a life after this one. God in man's formats sacrifice pre dates Christianity by thousands of years. Former Christian here and then I see the self righteous bull crap being spewed and it makes me sick..live love and learn.
Your premise absolutely false. Approximately one half of all abortions are against a male fetus. It cannot be a woman's body if it is a male fetus with XY chromosomes.joseywales said:
Not that simple, complex issue still a woman's body
For the sake of argument, if society healed and kept alive those 500,000 sick and/or starving children, would abortion still be OK, in your opinion?joseywales said:
Maybe all the diperstiois self righteous folks out there should spend theirtime yryingto jelthe 500,. 000 kids under the age of 5 that die from disease and starvation instead of standing out clinics holding a sign thinking they're the judge etc.
#BREAKING: Senate eyes quick passage of security for Supreme Court family members https://t.co/e3rucWMdzz pic.twitter.com/HxYH3NKsNR
— The Hill (@thehill) May 9, 2022
Id like to report this to the crazy lady heading the Disinformation Board
Not a drill. Republicans are coming for your contraception. They will shush you and tell you that claim is ridiculous. Except, it is happening. They see women as “domestic suppliers of infants.” We can turn back the clock to the dark ages or we can mobilize & save freedom. #Vote https://t.co/yaTUmzfVmO
— Rep. Eric Swalwell (@RepSwalwell) May 8, 2022
I don't know which party used the term "Domestic Supplier of Infants," but I know which one uses the term "Birthing Persons."Jack Bauer said:
Id like to report this to the crazy lady heading the Disinformation BoardNot a drill. Republicans are coming for your contraception. They will shush you and tell you that claim is ridiculous. Except, it is happening. They see women as “domestic suppliers of infants.” We can turn back the clock to the dark ages or we can mobilize & save freedom. #Vote https://t.co/yaTUmzfVmO
— Rep. Eric Swalwell (@RepSwalwell) May 8, 2022
Absolutely and encouraged those that were led to volunteer and/or give at a few different organizations and gave the contact information for them.Amal Shuq-Up said:There are more crisis pregnancy centers than unPlanned Parenthood surgical abortion facilities. These centers give the women options to abortion, help them apply for financial assistance, and counsel them. Did your pastor care to tell the congregation that help is actually available to women?90sBear said:Our pastor (to my great surprise) addressed the abortion topic in his sermon yesterday. One of the main takeaways was to say that if we as Christians want for there to be fewer abortions or for abortions to go away, then we as Christians have to make women feel confident that they will not be alone and will have support in all different ways from their community.Amal Shuq-Up said:People Who Make Bad Decisions: "Can I have others pay for my bad decisions?Waco1947 said:
Women: "Can I have birth control?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: "I couldn't get birth control so I got pregnant. Can I have an abortion?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: Can I have prenatal and post natal healthcare that I can afford?
Republicans: No
Women: Can I have affordable labor and birth care?
Republicans: No
Women: "I had the baby, but I'm out of work. Can I have WIC and food stamps until I get back on my feet?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: I found a job but it doesn't pay a livable wage. Can I have a $15 minimum wage.
Republicans: No
Women: "I found a job, but it doesn't offer me insurance. Can I have government guaranteed insurance?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: "My kid got sick and I got fired because I missed time caring for him. Can I get unemployment?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: "I'm having a hard time getting my kid from school consistently. Can we fund after-school programs?"
Republicans: "No."
Democrats: "Yes. Vote for us. We will transfer the burdens and expenses of your decisions on to others."
Might actually have been one of the best sermons I've heard this pastor give.
https://www.pregnancyandchildren.com/pregnancy/pregnancy_assistance.htm
His point was that women might feel more comfortable and consider keeping the child if they felt they would receive Christian love and support through the pregnancy and beyond if they did not feel as judged for their "Bad Decisions"
As I said, Christians have invested heavily in pro-life support for unplanned pregnancies. And yes, unplanned pregnancies outside of marriage are the result of bad decisions and usually more than one bad decision. Recognizing that fact is the other side of the same coin.90sBear said:Absolutely and encouraged those that were led to volunteer and/or give at a few different organizations and gave the contact information for them.Amal Shuq-Up said:There are more crisis pregnancy centers than unPlanned Parenthood surgical abortion facilities. These centers give the women options to abortion, help them apply for financial assistance, and counsel them. Did your pastor care to tell the congregation that help is actually available to women?90sBear said:Our pastor (to my great surprise) addressed the abortion topic in his sermon yesterday. One of the main takeaways was to say that if we as Christians want for there to be fewer abortions or for abortions to go away, then we as Christians have to make women feel confident that they will not be alone and will have support in all different ways from their community.Amal Shuq-Up said:People Who Make Bad Decisions: "Can I have others pay for my bad decisions?Waco1947 said:
Women: "Can I have birth control?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: "I couldn't get birth control so I got pregnant. Can I have an abortion?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: Can I have prenatal and post natal healthcare that I can afford?
Republicans: No
Women: Can I have affordable labor and birth care?
Republicans: No
Women: "I had the baby, but I'm out of work. Can I have WIC and food stamps until I get back on my feet?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: I found a job but it doesn't pay a livable wage. Can I have a $15 minimum wage.
Republicans: No
Women: "I found a job, but it doesn't offer me insurance. Can I have government guaranteed insurance?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: "My kid got sick and I got fired because I missed time caring for him. Can I get unemployment?"
Republicans: "No."
Women: "I'm having a hard time getting my kid from school consistently. Can we fund after-school programs?"
Republicans: "No."
Democrats: "Yes. Vote for us. We will transfer the burdens and expenses of your decisions on to others."
Might actually have been one of the best sermons I've heard this pastor give.
https://www.pregnancyandchildren.com/pregnancy/pregnancy_assistance.htm
His point was that women might feel more comfortable and consider keeping the child if they felt they would receive Christian love and support through the pregnancy and beyond if they did not feel as judged for their "Bad Decisions"