2024

757,646 Views | 11014 Replies | Last: 9 hrs ago by boognish_bear
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ScottS said:

boognish_bear said:


Question, why is Trump polling way better than Lake in AZ?


Lake is perceived as a vindictive crack pot? She has all of Trump's meaness and none of his humanity and humor. Bad combination.
sombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

ScottS said:

boognish_bear said:


Question, why is Trump polling way better than Lake in AZ?


Lake has always been a failure in Arizona for some reason.

Obviously I'm not in the State so I can not explain it…but it's a noticeable thing.

Trump does well…Lake does not
I wouldn't say Trump does well. He's only the second Republican to lose AZ, and his 2016 win was by one of the smallest margins. HIs approval rating in AZ is low 40s as it is in most other contested states. AZ is a toss-up.

And think about this. AZ remains a toss-up, yet immigration is the top issue, and inflation is #2.

Trump hand-picked Lake, and she has run two of the worst campaigns you'll ever see. She is a former liberal Dem who has flip-flopped, even recently, more than Kamala, and was famous for saying at two rallies, "We don't want McCain voters." I certainly have my issues with McCain, but you just don't say that in AZ.

Also, the AZ GOP is a complete mess.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doesn't really look right. I keep seeing how Republican voter registration is outpacing Dems in many states.

whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sombear said:

Redbrickbear said:

ScottS said:

boognish_bear said:


Question, why is Trump polling way better than Lake in AZ?


Lake has always been a failure in Arizona for some reason.

Obviously I'm not in the State so I can not explain it…but it's a noticeable thing.

Trump does well…Lake does not
I wouldn't say Trump does well. He's only the second Republican to lose AZ, and his 2016 win was by one of the smallest margins. HIs approval rating in AZ is low 40s as it is in most other contested states. AZ is a toss-up.

And think about this. AZ remains a toss-up, yet immigration is the top issue, and inflation is #2.

Trump hand-picked Lake, and she has run two of the worst campaigns you'll ever see. She is a former liberal Dem who has flip-flopped, even recently, more than Kamala, and was famous for saying at two rallies, "We don't want McCain voters." I certainly have my issues with McCain, but you just don't say that in AZ.

Also, the AZ GOP is a complete mess.
McCain wing of the AZ party is vindictive. Cross them and they will organize to vote Dem to defeat you. GOP moderates tend to be like that everywhere. The AZ faction is just larger and meaner than most.



sombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

sombear said:

Redbrickbear said:

ScottS said:

boognish_bear said:


Question, why is Trump polling way better than Lake in AZ?


Lake has always been a failure in Arizona for some reason.

Obviously I'm not in the State so I can not explain it…but it's a noticeable thing.

Trump does well…Lake does not
I wouldn't say Trump does well. He's only the second Republican to lose AZ, and his 2016 win was by one of the smallest margins. HIs approval rating in AZ is low 40s as it is in most other contested states. AZ is a toss-up.

And think about this. AZ remains a toss-up, yet immigration is the top issue, and inflation is #2.

Trump hand-picked Lake, and she has run two of the worst campaigns you'll ever see. She is a former liberal Dem who has flip-flopped, even recently, more than Kamala, and was famous for saying at two rallies, "We don't want McCain voters." I certainly have my issues with McCain, but you just don't say that in AZ.

Also, the AZ GOP is a complete mess.
McCain wing of the AZ party is vindictive. Cross them and they will organize to vote Dem to defeat you. GOP moderates tend to be like that everywhere. The AZ faction is just larger and meaner than most.




Kettle meet pot . . . .
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sombear said:

Redbrickbear said:

ScottS said:

boognish_bear said:


Question, why is Trump polling way better than Lake in AZ?


Lake has always been a failure in Arizona for some reason.

Obviously I'm not in the State so I can not explain it…but it's a noticeable thing.

Trump does well…Lake does not
I wouldn't say Trump does well. He's only the second Republican to lose AZ, and his 2016 win was by one of the smallest margins.

I'm sure mass legal and illegal immigration in Arizona has nothing to do with that.....


[2018: 960,275 immigrants made up 13% of the population of Arizona. 431,667 immigrants had naturalized, and at least 275,000 were undocumented]

We can also be sure the undocumented migrant population is much much higher than reported.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:


So the unhinged re-tread crackpot who lost the governor's race is now losing the senate race.

Man, I didn't see that coming.

I just hope to God we can move on from this broad.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

ScottS said:

boognish_bear said:


Question, why is Trump polling way better than Lake in AZ?


Lake has always been a failure in Arizona for some reason.

Obviously I'm not in the State so I can not explain it…but it's a noticeable thing.

Trump does well…Lake does not
Trump's hand-picked candidates generally fare poorly in elections. See 2022.

He's not a very good judge of these things. The selection of Vance as his VP candidate is a perfect example.
sombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

sombear said:

Redbrickbear said:

ScottS said:

boognish_bear said:


Question, why is Trump polling way better than Lake in AZ?


Lake has always been a failure in Arizona for some reason.

Obviously I'm not in the State so I can not explain it…but it's a noticeable thing.

Trump does well…Lake does not
I wouldn't say Trump does well. He's only the second Republican to lose AZ, and his 2016 win was by one of the smallest margins.

I'm sure mass legal and illegal immigration in Arizona has nothing to do with that.....


[2018: 960,275 immigrants made up 13% of the population of Arizona. 431,667 immigrants had naturalized, and at least 275,000 were undocumented]

We can also be sure the undocumented migrant population is much much higher than reported.
I mean, Ducey beat a Hispanic in 2018 by 14 points.

Biden only won Hispanics by around 57-43.

Trump's problem, as it was all over the Country, was losing the burbs. He lost freaking Maricopa for goodness sakes.
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Redbrickbear said:

ScottS said:

boognish_bear said:


Question, why is Trump polling way better than Lake in AZ?


Lake has always been a failure in Arizona for some reason.

Obviously I'm not in the State so I can not explain it…but it's a noticeable thing.

Trump does well…Lake does not
Trump's hand-picked candidates generally fare poorly in elections. See 2022.

He's not a very good judge of these things. The selection of Vance as his VP candidate is a perfect example.

If he doesn't win enough in the house and senate, he could get elected and then impeached/removed.
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sombear said:

Redbrickbear said:

sombear said:

Redbrickbear said:

ScottS said:

boognish_bear said:


Question, why is Trump polling way better than Lake in AZ?


Lake has always been a failure in Arizona for some reason.

Obviously I'm not in the State so I can not explain it…but it's a noticeable thing.

Trump does well…Lake does not
I wouldn't say Trump does well. He's only the second Republican to lose AZ, and his 2016 win was by one of the smallest margins.

I'm sure mass legal and illegal immigration in Arizona has nothing to do with that.....


[2018: 960,275 immigrants made up 13% of the population of Arizona. 431,667 immigrants had naturalized, and at least 275,000 were undocumented]

We can also be sure the undocumented migrant population is much much higher than reported.
I mean, Ducey beat a Hispanic in 2018 by 14 points.

Biden only won Hispanics by around 57-43.

Trump's problem, as it was all over the Country, was losing the burbs. He lost freaking Maricopa for goodness sakes.

Suburban women?
sombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ScottS said:

sombear said:

Redbrickbear said:

sombear said:

Redbrickbear said:

ScottS said:

boognish_bear said:


Question, why is Trump polling way better than Lake in AZ?


Lake has always been a failure in Arizona for some reason.

Obviously I'm not in the State so I can not explain it…but it's a noticeable thing.

Trump does well…Lake does not
I wouldn't say Trump does well. He's only the second Republican to lose AZ, and his 2016 win was by one of the smallest margins.

I'm sure mass legal and illegal immigration in Arizona has nothing to do with that.....


[2018: 960,275 immigrants made up 13% of the population of Arizona. 431,667 immigrants had naturalized, and at least 275,000 were undocumented]

We can also be sure the undocumented migrant population is much much higher than reported.
I mean, Ducey beat a Hispanic in 2018 by 14 points.

Biden only won Hispanics by around 57-43.

Trump's problem, as it was all over the Country, was losing the burbs. He lost freaking Maricopa for goodness sakes.

Suburban women?
Believe it or not, the gender gap isn't too bad in AZ.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump leads ticket splitters by 22.

The problem is not that Trump selects terrible candidates. It's that there are so few candidates like Trump.


sombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Trump leads ticket splitters by 22.

The problem is not that Trump selects terrible candidates. It's that there are so few candidates like Trump.



Yes, more Walkers, Oz, Lakes, Bolducs, Mastrianos, Dixons, Schmidts, and Masters, and fewer big winners - Youngkins, Kemps, Duceys, Hogans, Desantis, and Abbotts . . . .

Trump is performing a little better than the GOP candidates in those states solely because they are running against incumbents.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sombear said:

whiterock said:

Trump leads ticket splitters by 22.

The problem is not that Trump selects terrible candidates. It's that there are so few candidates like Trump.



Yes, more Walkers, Oz, Lakes, Bolducs, Mastrianos, Dixons, Schmidts, and Masters, and fewer big winners - Youngkins, Kemps, Duceys, Hogans, Desantis, and Abbotts . . . .

Trump is performing a little better than the GOP candidates in those states solely because they are running against incumbents.
or....more likely, its because Trump has crossover appeal they cannot match.

highly illogical that a populist Trump could be so effective with independents (which most public polls show he's winning, whether he's winning overall or not) yet his endorsement becomes kryptonite for down-ballot candidates.


sombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

Trump leads ticket splitters by 22.

The problem is not that Trump selects terrible candidates. It's that there are so few candidates like Trump.



Yes, more Walkers, Oz, Lakes, Bolducs, Mastrianos, Dixons, Schmidts, and Masters, and fewer big winners - Youngkins, Kemps, Duceys, Hogans, Desantis, and Abbotts . . . .

Trump is performing a little better than the GOP candidates in those states solely because they are running against incumbents.
or....more likely, its because Trump has crossover appeal they cannot match.

highly illogical that a populist Trump could be so effective with independents (which most public polls show he's winning, whether he's winning overall or not) yet his endorsement becomes kryptonite for down-ballot candidates.



I think it's more he just picks awful candidates.

But, look, you can't dispute Trump's unfavorable #s. They've basically been high 30s to low 40s, with some temporary bounces into mid-40s.

Those unfavorables can only generate negative coattails.

Trump's greatest strength as a candidate is that he has had historically weak opponents. That is a fact.

When MAGA candidates run against incumbents or even just average candidates, they don't do well. All the data is there.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sombear said:

whiterock said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

Trump leads ticket splitters by 22.

The problem is not that Trump selects terrible candidates. It's that there are so few candidates like Trump.



Yes, more Walkers, Oz, Lakes, Bolducs, Mastrianos, Dixons, Schmidts, and Masters, and fewer big winners - Youngkins, Kemps, Duceys, Hogans, Desantis, and Abbotts . . . .

Trump is performing a little better than the GOP candidates in those states solely because they are running against incumbents.
or....more likely, its because Trump has crossover appeal they cannot match.

highly illogical that a populist Trump could be so effective with independents (which most public polls show he's winning, whether he's winning overall or not) yet his endorsement becomes kryptonite for down-ballot candidates.



I think it's more he just picks awful candidates.
This.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

sombear said:

Redbrickbear said:

ScottS said:

boognish_bear said:


Question, why is Trump polling way better than Lake in AZ?


Lake has always been a failure in Arizona for some reason.

Obviously I'm not in the State so I can not explain it…but it's a noticeable thing.

Trump does well…Lake does not
I wouldn't say Trump does well. He's only the second Republican to lose AZ, and his 2016 win was by one of the smallest margins.

I'm sure mass legal and illegal immigration in Arizona has nothing to do with that.....


[2018: 960,275 immigrants made up 13% of the population of Arizona. 431,667 immigrants had naturalized, and at least 275,000 were undocumented]

We can also be sure the undocumented migrant population is much much higher than reported.

… and the fascists will make sure the non citizens vote in large numbers for Kommie Kamala, maybe even multiple times.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Using "only" with a 14 point margin doesn't make sense. That's a landslide.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nate Silver analysis showing what Rasmussen has been suggesting - Harris has peaked.

sombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Using "only" with a 14 point margin doesn't make sense. That's a landslide.
Not at all. A 14% margin among about 22% of the vote is nothing, especially in AZ where there are so few Black voters.

And that's not what costed Trump the burbs.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ScottS said:

boognish_bear said:


Question, why is Trump polling way better than Lake in AZ?
trump is trump and Lake is an idiot. She told McCain lovers to go away and never vote for her. They listened.
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The worst of them has a tied race

4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

The worst of them has a tied race


this one is interesting. The samples arent that bad at first glance but this is the only poll I have seen where the Dem canidate got 98-1

Most other polls are showing a wider spread with 3-4 not voting for Harris.
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
sombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

whiterock said:

The worst of them has a tied race


this one is interesting. The samples arent that bad at first glance but this is the only poll I have seen where the Dem canidate got 98-1

Most other polls are showing a wider spread with 3-4 not voting for Harris.
Even if Harrs wins national vote by 1%, Trump will win the election.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sombear said:

4th and Inches said:

whiterock said:

The worst of them has a tied race


this one is interesting. The samples arent that bad at first glance but this is the only poll I have seen where the Dem canidate got 98-1

Most other polls are showing a wider spread with 3-4 not voting for Harris.
Even if Harrs wins national vote by 1%, Trump will win the election.


yes, this is another terrible poll for Harris.

She is basically polling where Biden was in the swings when they replaced him.

Long road to Nov 5th for both sides
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sombear said:

4th and Inches said:

whiterock said:

The worst of them has a tied race


this one is interesting. The samples arent that bad at first glance but this is the only poll I have seen where the Dem canidate got 98-1

Most other polls are showing a wider spread with 3-4 not voting for Harris.
Even if Harrs wins national vote by 1%, Trump will win the election.

Baris agrees


sombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

sombear said:

4th and Inches said:

whiterock said:

The worst of them has a tied race


this one is interesting. The samples arent that bad at first glance but this is the only poll I have seen where the Dem canidate got 98-1

Most other polls are showing a wider spread with 3-4 not voting for Harris.
Even if Harrs wins national vote by 1%, Trump will win the election.

Baris agrees



Probably even 2%
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sombear said:

whiterock said:

sombear said:

4th and Inches said:

whiterock said:

The worst of them has a tied race


this one is interesting. The samples arent that bad at first glance but this is the only poll I have seen where the Dem canidate got 98-1

Most other polls are showing a wider spread with 3-4 not voting for Harris.
Even if Harrs wins national vote by 1%, Trump will win the election.

Baris agrees



Probably even 2%

Someone dropped an S bomb.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ScottS said:

sombear said:

whiterock said:

sombear said:

4th and Inches said:

whiterock said:

The worst of them has a tied race


this one is interesting. The samples arent that bad at first glance but this is the only poll I have seen where the Dem canidate got 98-1

Most other polls are showing a wider spread with 3-4 not voting for Harris.
Even if Harrs wins national vote by 1%, Trump will win the election.

Baris agrees



Probably even 2%

Someone dropped an S bomb.
Harris camp when they saw the polls
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He comes off better in interviews than he does speeches. They need to quit trying to write jokes for him. Not his strength.

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:


he isnt wrong.. most that are put out are wrong and private internals are expensive.

Both sides dont like the polls..
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
First Page Last Page
Page 218 of 315
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.