Psalm 119:36
You are both correct. Not acting on disordered desires may not be "sinful" in the sense that there is no active, willful commission of sin, but disordered desires come from our sin nature we inherited. Both are the "sin" that Jesus had to die for.Realitybites said:Harrison Bergeron said:
Being attracted to men is not sinful. Acting on it is.
You've fallen in to the philosophical tiger pit that the LGBT movement dug. A man being attracted to a woman is not inherently disordered. A man being attracted to a man is inherently disordered. The first step down this long road was delisting homosexuality as a mental illness.
Aliceinbubbleland said:
You just described a ton of MAGAs
He also describe a ton of Vote Blue No Matter Who cultAliceinbubbleland said:
You just described a ton of MAGAs
Favor - can someone explain the meme to me? Seems like it got removed, but I have seen this chick a bunch ... what is the story?whiterock said:
Incorrect. You're projecting.Aliceinbubbleland said:
You just described a ton of MAGAs
A grown man dressed up as a little girl for Disney’s “pride night.”
— I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸 (@ImMeme0) June 22, 2024
Say whatever you want but this sh*t is not normal. pic.twitter.com/qC6N1TKfF4
your name calling is unchristianLIB,MR BEARS said:
I may owe 47 and his buds an apology. It's not just the tranies and rump rangers coming after the kids.🚨Sexualisation of kids
— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) June 22, 2024
Trigger warning ‼️
Book aimed at young children about ‘Swingers Parties’
They’re coming for your children. pic.twitter.com/dpWde07nLG
Waco1947 said:your name calling is unchristianLIB,MR BEARS said:
I may owe 47 and his buds an apology. It's not just the tranies and rump rangers coming after the kids.🚨Sexualisation of kids
— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) June 22, 2024
Trigger warning ‼️
Book aimed at young children about ‘Swingers Parties’
They’re coming for your children. pic.twitter.com/dpWde07nLG
I John 4 20 Whoever claims to love God yet hates a brother or sister is a liar. For whoever does not love their brother and sister, whom they have seen, cannot love God, whom they have not seen. 21 And he has given us this command: Anyone who loves God must also love their brother and sister.
Shame you n you for being the nasty things you say about me and other brothers and sisters in Christ.
What do you go to to? You are hypocritical to your faith.
Your words are hurtful to friends of mine. Name calling is name calling. Jesus commands us to loveLIB,MR BEARS said:Waco1947 said:your name calling is unchristianLIB,MR BEARS said:
I may owe 47 and his buds an apology. It's not just the tranies and rump rangers coming after the kids.🚨Sexualisation of kids
— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) June 22, 2024
Trigger warning ‼️
Book aimed at young children about ‘Swingers Parties’
They’re coming for your children. pic.twitter.com/dpWde07nLG
I John 4 20 Whoever claims to love God yet hates a brother or sister is a liar. For whoever does not love their brother and sister, whom they have seen, cannot love God, whom they have not seen. 21 And he has given us this command: Anyone who loves God must also love their brother and sister.
Shame you n you for being the nasty things you say about me and other brothers and sisters in Christ.
What do you go to to? You are hypocritical to your faith.
I never said I hate. In fact, I pity them.
Regarding name calling, here's one more for you that is worse than rump ranger, heretic.
it must be so galling when the rebuttal to the point you are trying to make is contained in your own evidenceLIB,MR BEARS said:
I may owe 47 and his buds an apology. It's not just the tranies and rump rangers coming after the kids.🚨Sexualisation of kids
— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) June 22, 2024
Trigger warning ‼️
Book aimed at young children about ‘Swingers Parties’
They’re coming for your children. pic.twitter.com/dpWde07nLG
not really. There's a reason the "comedian" made it look like a kids book and I don't think it was for loads of laughs.cms186 said:it must be so galling when the rebuttal to the point you are trying to make is contained in your own evidenceLIB,MR BEARS said:
I may owe 47 and his buds an apology. It's not just the tranies and rump rangers coming after the kids.🚨Sexualisation of kids
— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) June 22, 2024
Trigger warning ‼️
Book aimed at young children about ‘Swingers Parties’
They’re coming for your children. pic.twitter.com/dpWde07nLG
Ive not read the book and i dont know of the Author, i dont know why they chose to market their book like this, but i dont know the context and I dont usually judge people out of context.LIB,MR BEARS said:not really. There's a reason the "comedian" made it look like a kids book and I don't think it was for loads of laughs.cms186 said:it must be so galling when the rebuttal to the point you are trying to make is contained in your own evidenceLIB,MR BEARS said:
I may owe 47 and his buds an apology. It's not just the tranies and rump rangers coming after the kids.🚨Sexualisation of kids
— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) June 22, 2024
Trigger warning ‼️
Book aimed at young children about ‘Swingers Parties’
They’re coming for your children. pic.twitter.com/dpWde07nLG
Since when do libs give comedians a pass on offensive content? Is it only content y'all/they disagree with?
cms186 said:Ive not read the book and i dont know of the Author, i dont know why they chose to market their book like this, but i dont know the context and I dont usually judge people out of context.LIB,MR BEARS said:not really. There's a reason the "comedian" made it look like a kids book and I don't think it was for loads of laughs.cms186 said:it must be so galling when the rebuttal to the point you are trying to make is contained in your own evidenceLIB,MR BEARS said:
I may owe 47 and his buds an apology. It's not just the tranies and rump rangers coming after the kids.🚨Sexualisation of kids
— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) June 22, 2024
Trigger warning ‼️
Book aimed at young children about ‘Swingers Parties’
They’re coming for your children. pic.twitter.com/dpWde07nLG
Since when do libs give comedians a pass on offensive content? Is it only content y'all/they disagree with?
A cursory google search would indicate hes a reasonably successful Author (apparently released over 120 books) which would lead me to question why he might want to release a book that might end his career, but then again Im not a wild conspiracy theorist looking to smear anyone or anything that doesnt align with my World view
But thats the point, its not a "Kids Book" even the tiniest bit of research shows that the "gimmick" of this book is that its part of a series called "Rejected Childrens Books" marketed as Adult Humour in an unconventional setting.LIB,MR BEARS said:cms186 said:Ive not read the book and i dont know of the Author, i dont know why they chose to market their book like this, but i dont know the context and I dont usually judge people out of context.LIB,MR BEARS said:not really. There's a reason the "comedian" made it look like a kids book and I don't think it was for loads of laughs.cms186 said:it must be so galling when the rebuttal to the point you are trying to make is contained in your own evidenceLIB,MR BEARS said:
I may owe 47 and his buds an apology. It's not just the tranies and rump rangers coming after the kids.🚨Sexualisation of kids
— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) June 22, 2024
Trigger warning ‼️
Book aimed at young children about ‘Swingers Parties’
They’re coming for your children. pic.twitter.com/dpWde07nLG
Since when do libs give comedians a pass on offensive content? Is it only content y'all/they disagree with?
A cursory google search would indicate hes a reasonably successful Author (apparently released over 120 books) which would lead me to question why he might want to release a book that might end his career, but then again Im not a wild conspiracy theorist looking to smear anyone or anything that doesnt align with my World view
It must be so galling when the kids book is in the link and read page by page. Getting to see the book for what it is is only a click away.
Waco1947 said:Your words are hurtful to friends of mine. Name calling is name calling. Jesus commands us to loveLIB,MR BEARS said:Waco1947 said:your name calling is unchristianLIB,MR BEARS said:
I may owe 47 and his buds an apology. It's not just the tranies and rump rangers coming after the kids.🚨Sexualisation of kids
— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) June 22, 2024
Trigger warning ‼️
Book aimed at young children about ‘Swingers Parties’
They’re coming for your children. pic.twitter.com/dpWde07nLG
I John 4 20 Whoever claims to love God yet hates a brother or sister is a liar. For whoever does not love their brother and sister, whom they have seen, cannot love God, whom they have not seen. 21 And he has given us this command: Anyone who loves God must also love their brother and sister.
Shame you n you for being the nasty things you say about me and other brothers and sisters in Christ.
What do you go to to? You are hypocritical to your faith.
I never said I hate. In fact, I pity them.
Regarding name calling, here's one more for you that is worse than rump ranger, heretic.
bingo and hot dawgAliceinbubbleland said:
You just described a ton of MAGAs
Aliceinbubbleland said:
You just described a ton of MAGAs
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:You are both correct. Not acting on disordered desires may not be "sinful" in the sense that there is no active, willful commission of sin, but disordered desires come from our sin nature we inherited. Both are the "sin" that Jesus had to die for.Realitybites said:Harrison Bergeron said:
Being attracted to men is not sinful. Acting on it is.
You've fallen in to the philosophical tiger pit that the LGBT movement dug. A man being attracted to a woman is not inherently disordered. A man being attracted to a man is inherently disordered. The first step down this long road was delisting homosexuality as a mental illness.
I agree one hundred percent though, that it'd be wrong to say that there is absolutely nothing wrong with just having the desire.
historian said:BusyTarpDuster2017 said:You are both correct. Not acting on disordered desires may not be "sinful" in the sense that there is no active, willful commission of sin, but disordered desires come from our sin nature we inherited. Both are the "sin" that Jesus had to die for.Realitybites said:Harrison Bergeron said:
Being attracted to men is not sinful. Acting on it is.
You've fallen in to the philosophical tiger pit that the LGBT movement dug. A man being attracted to a woman is not inherently disordered. A man being attracted to a man is inherently disordered. The first step down this long road was delisting homosexuality as a mental illness.
I agree one hundred percent though, that it'd be wrong to say that there is absolutely nothing wrong with just having the desire.
Jesus has something to say about sinful thoughts in Matthew:
"You have heard that it was said, 'You shall not commit adultery.' But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart." Matthew 5:27-28
historian said:BusyTarpDuster2017 said:You are both correct. Not acting on disordered desires may not be "sinful" in the sense that there is no active, willful commission of sin, but disordered desires come from our sin nature we inherited. Both are the "sin" that Jesus had to die for.Realitybites said:Harrison Bergeron said:
Being attracted to men is not sinful. Acting on it is.
You've fallen in to the philosophical tiger pit that the LGBT movement dug. A man being attracted to a woman is not inherently disordered. A man being attracted to a man is inherently disordered. The first step down this long road was delisting homosexuality as a mental illness.
I agree one hundred percent though, that it'd be wrong to say that there is absolutely nothing wrong with just having the desire.
Jesus has something to say about sinful thoughts in Matthew:
"You have heard that it was said, 'You shall not commit adultery.' But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart." Matthew 5:27-28
Aliceinbubbleland said:
You just described a ton of MAGAs
Your friends are hurtful to kidsWaco1947 said:Your words are hurtful to friends of mine. Name calling is name calling. Jesus commands us to loveLIB,MR BEARS said:Waco1947 said:your name calling is unchristianLIB,MR BEARS said:
I may owe 47 and his buds an apology. It's not just the tranies and rump rangers coming after the kids.🚨Sexualisation of kids
— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) June 22, 2024
Trigger warning ‼️
Book aimed at young children about ‘Swingers Parties’
They’re coming for your children. pic.twitter.com/dpWde07nLG
I John 4 20 Whoever claims to love God yet hates a brother or sister is a liar. For whoever does not love their brother and sister, whom they have seen, cannot love God, whom they have not seen. 21 And he has given us this command: Anyone who loves God must also love their brother and sister.
Shame you n you for being the nasty things you say about me and other brothers and sisters in Christ.
What do you go to to? You are hypocritical to your faith.
I never said I hate. In fact, I pity them.
Regarding name calling, here's one more for you that is worse than rump ranger, heretic.
A young child walks with a naked Drag Queen at a ‘Drag Show’ in Miami, Florida.
— Cillian (@CilComLFC) June 23, 2024
Every adult in this video needs to be thrown in Jail, and that’s a hill I’m willing to die on. pic.twitter.com/G0IwdZRIXE
Having the desire or orientation itself is a result of man's broken state. It is the result of sin nature. It's not wrong to say that they're not actively sinning for just the orientation alone, but it'd definitely be wrong to say that they're without sin for having it. This goes for all desires and orientations toward anything that is against God's design and will, not just homosexuality.LIB,MR BEARS said:historian said:BusyTarpDuster2017 said:You are both correct. Not acting on disordered desires may not be "sinful" in the sense that there is no active, willful commission of sin, but disordered desires come from our sin nature we inherited. Both are the "sin" that Jesus had to die for.Realitybites said:Harrison Bergeron said:
Being attracted to men is not sinful. Acting on it is.
You've fallen in to the philosophical tiger pit that the LGBT movement dug. A man being attracted to a woman is not inherently disordered. A man being attracted to a man is inherently disordered. The first step down this long road was delisting homosexuality as a mental illness.
I agree one hundred percent though, that it'd be wrong to say that there is absolutely nothing wrong with just having the desire.
Jesus has something to say about sinful thoughts in Matthew:
"You have heard that it was said, 'You shall not commit adultery.' But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart." Matthew 5:27-28
We cannot prevent birds from flying over our heads, but we can keep them from making nest on top of our heads.
IMHO, a person with same-sex attraction would not be sinning regarding those thoughts until they dwell on those thoughts or act on those thoughts. As they grow in Christ, those things should occur less and less.
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:Having the desire or orientation itself is a result of man's broken state. It is the result of sin nature. It's not wrong to say that they're not actively sinning for just the orientation alone, but it'd definitely be wrong to say that they're without sin for having it. This goes for all desires and orientations toward anything that is against God's design and will, not just homosexuality.LIB,MR BEARS said:historian said:BusyTarpDuster2017 said:You are both correct. Not acting on disordered desires may not be "sinful" in the sense that there is no active, willful commission of sin, but disordered desires come from our sin nature we inherited. Both are the "sin" that Jesus had to die for.Realitybites said:Harrison Bergeron said:
Being attracted to men is not sinful. Acting on it is.
You've fallen in to the philosophical tiger pit that the LGBT movement dug. A man being attracted to a woman is not inherently disordered. A man being attracted to a man is inherently disordered. The first step down this long road was delisting homosexuality as a mental illness.
I agree one hundred percent though, that it'd be wrong to say that there is absolutely nothing wrong with just having the desire.
Jesus has something to say about sinful thoughts in Matthew:
"You have heard that it was said, 'You shall not commit adultery.' But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart." Matthew 5:27-28
We cannot prevent birds from flying over our heads, but we can keep them from making nest on top of our heads.
IMHO, a person with same-sex attraction would not be sinning regarding those thoughts until they dwell on those thoughts or act on those thoughts. As they grow in Christ, those things should occur less and less.
historian said:
google up "hawk tuah girl" and watch a video of her original interview. Then the memes will all make senseHarrison Bergeron said:Favor - can someone explain the meme to me? Seems like it got removed, but I have seen this chick a bunch ... what is the story?whiterock said:
But that reasons that LGBT people want everyone to be LGBT, thats not really the case outside of some exceptionsRealitybites said:historian said:
Because there is nothing inherent in LGBT behavior that can perpetuate itself. It relies on grooming to transmit itself to the next generation.