Because we need a thread about Trump's choices for the new administration

4,159 Views | 149 Replies | Last: 3 hrs ago by 4th and Inches
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:


The recess appointment you are referring to has never been done in the history of the Republic. Remember the tale of Harry Reid. This will be precedent that presidents will invoke in the future and you may not like it in 2028 when President Ocasio Cortez uses Trump's recess appointment precedent to ram through
dis Secretary Designate Elizabeth Warren.
Why are we afraid of a Senate confirmation hearing in a Republican Senate? Why are you trying to suppress information about Gaetz (House Ethics report)?




Why not admit you're strangely obsessed with the Gaetz guy. I think confirming a guy who sextrafficks minors is bad for the country


Again,

You have proof of that charge?

We have a little thing in this country called innocent until proven guilty in a court of law Mr. Authoritarian

Thank God you still have to prove charges in this country.
I think we agree there should be a senate confirmation hearing. This isn't a criminal trial. Gaetz deserves a chance to answer the charges.


Whast the point...you have already decided he is guilty

You have been accusing him of being a "sex trafficker"

Again....with no proof

That is a pretty slimy thing to do.
That's why we need a hearing to prove me wrong and to vindicate Gaetz.
The point is the confirmation hearings are in the Constitution
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:


The recess appointment you are referring to has never been done in the history of the Republic. Remember the tale of Harry Reid. This will be precedent that presidents will invoke in the future and you may not like it in 2028 when President Ocasio Cortez uses Trump's recess appointment precedent to ram through
dis Secretary Designate Elizabeth Warren.
Why are we afraid of a Senate confirmation hearing in a Republican Senate? Why are you trying to suppress information about Gaetz (House Ethics report)?




Why not admit you're strangely obsessed with the Gaetz guy. I think confirming a guy who sextrafficks minors is bad for the country


Again,

You have proof of that charge?

We have a little thing in this country called innocent until proven guilty in a court of law Mr. Authoritarian

Thank God you still have to prove charges in this country.
I think we agree there should be a senate confirmation hearing. This isn't a criminal trial. Gaetz deserves a chance to answer the charges.


Whast the point...you have already decided he is guilty

You have been accusing him of being a "sex trafficker"

Again....with no proof

That is a pretty slimy thing to do.
That's why we need a hearing to prove me wrong and to vindicate Gaetz.
The point is the confirmation hearings are in the Constitution
1. Who are you that the American people need to have hearings to prove you wrong?

(I mean you are wrong most of the time anyway lol)

2. Giving people vindication from spurious charges is not actually the Constitutional purpose of confirmation hearings before the Senate.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:


The recess appointment you are referring to has never been done in the history of the Republic. Remember the tale of Harry Reid. This will be precedent that presidents will invoke in the future and you may not like it in 2028 when President Ocasio Cortez uses Trump's recess appointment precedent to ram through
dis Secretary Designate Elizabeth Warren.
Why are we afraid of a Senate confirmation hearing in a Republican Senate? Why are you trying to suppress information about Gaetz (House Ethics report)?




Why not admit you're strangely obsessed with the Gaetz guy. I think confirming a guy who sextrafficks minors is bad for the country


Again,

You have proof of that charge?

We have a little thing in this country called innocent until proven guilty in a court of law Mr. Authoritarian

Thank God you still have to prove charges in this country.
I think we agree there should be a senate confirmation hearing. This isn't a criminal trial. Gaetz deserves a chance to answer the charges.
Why can't we see the House Ethics committee report?

I think the authoritarians want to install cabinet members without confirmation hearings

If the recess appointment scheme was the accepted precedent in 2016, Merrick Garland would be aan associate justice of the Supreme Court


" The Supreme Court affirmed that pro forma sessions are sufficient to prevent recess appointments and addressed other intricacies of the practice in NLRB v. Noel Canning (2014). Appointments made during a recess must be confirmed by the Senate by the end of the next session of Congress, or the appointment expires."
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:


The recess appointment you are referring to has never been done in the history of the Republic. Remember the tale of Harry Reid. This will be precedent that presidents will invoke in the future and you may not like it in 2028 when President Ocasio Cortez uses Trump's recess appointment precedent to ram through
dis Secretary Designate Elizabeth Warren.
Why are we afraid of a Senate confirmation hearing in a Republican Senate? Why are you trying to suppress information about Gaetz (House Ethics report)?




Why not admit you're strangely obsessed with the Gaetz guy. I think confirming a guy who sextrafficks minors is bad for the country


Again,

You have proof of that charge?

We have a little thing in this country called innocent until proven guilty in a court of law Mr. Authoritarian

Thank God you still have to prove charges in this country.
I think we agree there should be a senate confirmation hearing. This isn't a criminal trial. Gaetz deserves a chance to answer the charges.


Whast the point...you have already decided he is guilty

You have been accusing him of being a "sex trafficker"

Again....with no proof

That is a pretty slimy thing to do.
That's why we need a hearing to prove me wrong and to vindicate Gaetz.
The point is the confirmation hearings are in the Constitution
1. Who are you that the American people need to have hearings to prove you wrong? Senate confirmation required by Constitution, whatever that means to you.

(I mean you are wrong most of the time anyway lol)

2. Giving people vindication from spurious charges is not actually the Constitutional purpose of confirmation hearings before the Senate. Okay, why are you so afraid of hearing?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:


The recess appointment you are referring to has never been done in the history of the Republic. Remember the tale of Harry Reid. This will be precedent that presidents will invoke in the future and you may not like it in 2028 when President Ocasio Cortez uses Trump's recess appointment precedent to ram through
dis Secretary Designate Elizabeth Warren.
Why are we afraid of a Senate confirmation hearing in a Republican Senate? Why are you trying to suppress information about Gaetz (House Ethics report)?




Why not admit you're strangely obsessed with the Gaetz guy. I think confirming a guy who sextrafficks minors is bad for the country


Again,

You have proof of that charge?

We have a little thing in this country called innocent until proven guilty in a court of law Mr. Authoritarian

Thank God you still have to prove charges in this country.
I think we agree there should be a senate confirmation hearing. This isn't a criminal trial. Gaetz deserves a chance to answer the charges.


Whast the point...you have already decided he is guilty

You have been accusing him of being a "sex trafficker"

Again....with no proof

That is a pretty slimy thing to do.
That's why we need a hearing to prove me wrong and to vindicate Gaetz.
The point is the confirmation hearings are in the Constitution


You still have it exactly backwards.

The onus is NOT on the accused to prove his innocence, but on the accusers to prove their case with solid evidence.

Unless and until that happens, selling Gaetz as guilty unless he proves his innocence is as Unamerican as working for The View .
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:


The recess appointment you are referring to has never been done in the history of the Republic. Remember the tale of Harry Reid. This will be precedent that presidents will invoke in the future and you may not like it in 2028 when President Ocasio Cortez uses Trump's recess appointment precedent to ram through
dis Secretary Designate Elizabeth Warren.
Why are we afraid of a Senate confirmation hearing in a Republican Senate? Why are you trying to suppress information about Gaetz (House Ethics report)?




Why not admit you're strangely obsessed with the Gaetz guy. I think confirming a guy who sextrafficks minors is bad for the country


Again,

You have proof of that charge?

We have a little thing in this country called innocent until proven guilty in a court of law Mr. Authoritarian

Thank God you still have to prove charges in this country.

As far as the fascists are concerned, all it takes is for someone, anyone, to accuse a Republican of a crime & they are automatically guilty. OTOH, no accusation against a Clinton, Obama, Biden, Pelosi, etc is ever credible no matter how much evidence there might be. They said always believe women, unless she was Juanita Broderick, etc.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:


The recess appointment you are referring to has never been done in the history of the Republic. Remember the tale of Harry Reid. This will be precedent that presidents will invoke in the future and you may not like it in 2028 when President Ocasio Cortez uses Trump's recess appointment precedent to ram through
dis Secretary Designate Elizabeth Warren.
Why are we afraid of a Senate confirmation hearing in a Republican Senate? Why are you trying to suppress information about Gaetz (House Ethics report)?




Why not admit you're strangely obsessed with the Gaetz guy. I think confirming a guy who sextrafficks minors is bad for the country


Again,

You have proof of that charge?

We have a little thing in this country called innocent until proven guilty in a court of law Mr. Authoritarian

Thank God you still have to prove charges in this country.
I think we agree there should be a senate confirmation hearing. This isn't a criminal trial. Gaetz deserves a chance to answer the charges.


Whast the point...you have already decided he is guilty

You have been accusing him of being a "sex trafficker"

Again....with no proof

That is a pretty slimy thing to do.
That's why we need a hearing to prove me wrong and to vindicate Gaetz.
The point is the confirmation hearings are in the Constitution


You still have it exactly backwards.

The onus is NOT on the accused to prove his innocence, but on the accusers to prove their case with solid evidence.

Unless and until that happens, selling Gaetz as guilty unless he proves his innocence is as Unamerican as working for The View .

Sure but its Osodecentx... he does not actually care about our Constitution or innocence

He cares about partisan character assassination and working his own personal hobby horse of hating Gaetz
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:


The recess appointment you are referring to has never been done in the history of the Republic. Remember the tale of Harry Reid. This will be precedent that presidents will invoke in the future and you may not like it in 2028 when President Ocasio Cortez uses Trump's recess appointment precedent to ram through
dis Secretary Designate Elizabeth Warren.
Why are we afraid of a Senate confirmation hearing in a Republican Senate? Why are you trying to suppress information about Gaetz (House Ethics report)?




Why not admit you're strangely obsessed with the Gaetz guy. I think confirming a guy who sextrafficks minors is bad for the country


Again,

You have proof of that charge?

We have a little thing in this country called innocent until proven guilty in a court of law Mr. Authoritarian

Thank God you still have to prove charges in this country.
I think we agree there should be a senate confirmation hearing. This isn't a criminal trial. Gaetz deserves a chance to answer the charges.


Whast the point...you have already decided he is guilty

You have been accusing him of being a "sex trafficker"

Again....with no proof

That is a pretty slimy thing to do.
That's why we need a hearing to prove me wrong and to vindicate Gaetz.
The point is the confirmation hearings are in the Constitution


2. Giving people vindication from spurious charges is not actually the Constitutional purpose of confirmation hearings before the Senate. Okay, why are you so afraid of hearing?


I'm not

Why are you so obsessed with leveling unproven slander at a guy and trying to give Democrats a chance to derail one of President Trump's nominations?
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dems should be afraid of the hearings. Gaetz knows the law equally as well if not better. There is a very good chance they will open a door that destroys many of their own without guaranteeing the destruction of The nomination
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:


The recess appointment you are referring to has never been done in the history of the Republic. Remember the tale of Harry Reid. This will be precedent that presidents will invoke in the future and you may not like it in 2028 when President Ocasio Cortez uses Trump's recess appointment precedent to ram through
dis Secretary Designate Elizabeth Warren.
Why are we afraid of a Senate confirmation hearing in a Republican Senate? Why are you trying to suppress information about Gaetz (House Ethics report)?




Why not admit you're strangely obsessed with the Gaetz guy. I think confirming a guy who sextrafficks minors is bad for the country


Again,

You have proof of that charge?

We have a little thing in this country called innocent until proven guilty in a court of law Mr. Authoritarian

Thank God you still have to prove charges in this country.
I think we agree there should be a senate confirmation hearing. This isn't a criminal trial. Gaetz deserves a chance to answer the charges.
Why can't we see the House Ethics committee report?

I think the authoritarians want to install cabinet members without confirmation hearings

If the recess appointment scheme was the accepted precedent in 2016, Merrick Garland would be aan associate justice of the Supreme Court


" The Supreme Court affirmed that pro forma sessions are sufficient to prevent recess appointments and addressed other intricacies of the practice in NLRB v. Noel Canning (2014). Appointments made during a recess must be confirmed by the Senate by the end of the next session of Congress, or the appointment expires."
dont tell him, watching him dig the hole is fun
Adopt-a-Bear 2024

#90 COOPER LANZ ( DL )
CLASS Junior
HT/WT 6' 3", 288 lbs


#50 KAIAN ROBERTS-DAY ( DL )
CLASS Sophomore
HT/WT 6' 3", 273 lbs
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.