Contemporary Evangelical Church Discussion

14,100 Views | 419 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by BusyTarpDuster2017
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Realitybites said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Realitybites said:

One of the fundamental tenants of the Christian faith for 2000 years has been "We look forward to the resurrection of the dead and the life of the world to come. Amen." Those are the words that conclude our foundational creed.

It is entirely irrational to put your faith in a God who raises the dead and heals the sick and then cancel worship services for Him because of a respiratory virus. It is also bad to reopen and segregate your congregation by mask or vax status.

Yet the overwhelming majority of western churches did this.


In your eyes, is Jay walking, looking both ways before crossing the street, following speed limits, wearing a helmet or seatbelt wrong?

There is a difference between wandering around a broken creation doing secular things and going to church in good faith to worship a God who heals the sick and raises the dead.
But a lot of people did die from Covid, right? Why can't cancelling worship services for a temporary period be viewed as caring for the well-being of the congregants? Why does it have to be viewed as some sinister plot to join with the "woke" secular world?


Because that perspective is different from his so, it must be wrong.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

Waco1947 said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Waco1947 said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Waco1947 said:

Fre3dombear said:

Waco1947 said:

BUDOS said:

Good points as is often the case; however, isn't the word of God and His teachings the foundation? Realizing I'm not the Bible scholar like a few of you, a quick example would be that the Triune God says we are to pray to Him, not anyone else. So, if that's what He said, why would it matter if a group of the smartest theologians said something else?
Why create another barrier? Don't We have enough Pharisees already? Not looking for a fight; just trying to learn why some seem to disagree.

The "Triune God" is a creation of the early church and the trinity is not mentioned in the Bible.
Its creation was the result of our monotheistic roots in Judaism. The early church councils felt forced to defend a monotheistic God that also apparently believed in Jesus and Holy Spirit.
To me the Trinity is not essential to our faith.


Was Jesus God or no?
Fair question. But first I would ask; who is the Jesus of the gospel writers and kerygma of the early church? I don't doubt Jesus is historical but what we have is fragments of his words were redacted by the Synoptic gospel writers to highlight their theology organic to the church (churches) to which they were writing. However, I posit a historical and contextual understanding of gospels. German Biblical theologians called it "Sitz im Leben", that is, the church's historical situation.
The answer to your question is not binary.


Cop out
Quote:

Cop out Not a cop out.
Question: Who is the Jesus of the synoptic gospels and kerygma of the early church?
1) Premise: Jesus is historical
2) Premise: what we have is fragments of his words were redacted by the Synoptic gospel writers to highlight their theology
3) Premise : the gospels are organic to the church (or churches) to which they were writing.
4) Premise: I posit a historical and contextual understanding of gospels. German Biblical theologians called it "Sitz im Leben", that is, the church's historical situation and that context is hugely formative to the gospels

Conclusion: The answer to your question is not binary but complex.
Now your job is to refute my premises
Or you can cop out..

Read Gen 1:2, Gen 1:26, John 1:1, John 1:14, John 1:32 and Matt 3:16

Those verses will tell you Who Jesus, God and the Holy Spirit are.
Deal with my premises. Which one (s) is wrong and why?
You stated "Fair question but first…"

How about first you deal with the fair question. You use this same tactic constantly avoiding questions and trying to redirect the conversation with your premise.

While you think about Immanuel, you can answer the fair question.
I don't re-direct" but question and argue and debate. You simply present conclusions about doctrine drawn from Christian orthodoxy. There might be other ways to understand doctrine,
plus doctrine is not scripture.
Waco1947 ,la
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Waco1947 said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Waco1947 said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Waco1947 said:

Fre3dombear said:

Waco1947 said:

BUDOS said:

Good points as is often the case; however, isn't the word of God and His teachings the foundation? Realizing I'm not the Bible scholar like a few of you, a quick example would be that the Triune God says we are to pray to Him, not anyone else. So, if that's what He said, why would it matter if a group of the smartest theologians said something else?
Why create another barrier? Don't We have enough Pharisees already? Not looking for a fight; just trying to learn why some seem to disagree.

The "Triune God" is a creation of the early church and the trinity is not mentioned in the Bible.
Its creation was the result of our monotheistic roots in Judaism. The early church councils felt forced to defend a monotheistic God that also apparently believed in Jesus and Holy Spirit.
To me the Trinity is not essential to our faith.


Was Jesus God or no?
Fair question. But first I would ask; who is the Jesus of the gospel writers and kerygma of the early church? I don't doubt Jesus is historical but what we have is fragments of his words were redacted by the Synoptic gospel writers to highlight their theology organic to the church (churches) to which they were writing. However, I posit a historical and contextual understanding of gospels. German Biblical theologians called it "Sitz im Leben", that is, the church's historical situation.
The answer to your question is not binary.


Cop out
Quote:

Cop out Not a cop out.
Question: Who is the Jesus of the synoptic gospels and kerygma of the early church?
1) Premise: Jesus is historical
2) Premise: what we have is fragments of his words were redacted by the Synoptic gospel writers to highlight their theology
3) Premise : the gospels are organic to the church (or churches) to which they were writing.
4) Premise: I posit a historical and contextual understanding of gospels. German Biblical theologians called it "Sitz im Leben", that is, the church's historical situation and that context is hugely formative to the gospels

Conclusion: The answer to your question is not binary but complex.
Now your job is to refute my premises
Or you can cop out..

Read Gen 1:2, Gen 1:26, John 1:1, John 1:14, John 1:32 and Matt 3:16

Those verses will tell you Who Jesus, God and the Holy Spirit are.
Deal with my premises. Which one (s) is wrong and why?
You stated "Fair question but first…"

How about first you deal with the fair question. You use this same tactic constantly avoiding questions and trying to redirect the conversation with your premise.

While you think about Immanuel, you can answer the fair question.
I don't re-direct" but question and argue and debate. You simply present conclusions about doctrine drawn from Christian orthodoxy. There might be other ways to understand doctrine,
plus doctrine is not scripture.

You're still avoiding the fair question
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In your estimation I am avoiding the question.
I stated my premises with regards to Jesus as the Son of God. That's my answer and it is not binary.
Waco1947 ,la
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Mothra said:

Realitybites said:

Mothra said:

'll take a shot at this, as the answer is pretty simple.

We ask other believers and brothers in Christ to pray for us because they are 1) believers; and 2) alive. See James 5:16.

Praying to a long dead mortal is like praying to your long dead drinking buddy. It's worthless.


"And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?" (John 11:26)

So if you simply take what Jesus says at face value, you realize that those whose physical bodies have fallen asleep in the Lord are not dead. So the parallel of praying to a long dead mortal/long dead drinking buddy has absolutely zero relevance to the Christian who has passed into the afterlife.

It's sad that when so many modernists and believers in scientism respond to this question, they tell Jesus "Actually, no I don't. I'm more of a gnostic. The body doesn't mean anything, we cremate it usually, and move on after a memorial service instead of a funeral. Ashes to ashes and all, don't ya know."



After which he says "But I would not have you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning them which are asleep, that ye sorrow not, even as others which have no hope."(1st Thessalonians 4:13).
Your reasoning here is pretty disingenuous, but I guess when you have no scripture to support your practice, trying to mischaracterize your opponents' position is all you got. Let me help you:

As any reasonable person reading my post clearly understood, I was referring to the mortal body, which does indeed die (unless you're Enoch or Elijah). See Genesis 3:19. God, in Genesis, describes physical death as an act of mercy. See Genesis 3:22. And of course, scripture clearly distinguishes between the mortal body and the spiritual one. See 1 Thessalonians 5:23. The idea that this is a "modernist" or "gnostic" view is pretty remarkable, it's so ill-informed.

While I was pointing out the clear and obvious logical errors in freedombear's analogy, the big picture problem with praying to long (physically) dead mortals is there is no evidence in scripture that their spirits can 1) answer our prayers; or 2) hear them.

Sorry for destroying your misguided and unscriptural belief on this subject.
Careful now. Speaking biblical truth around here is gonna get you accused of being a know-it-all who doesn't want to learn anything, who "strips people of their humanity".
If his response hadn't been so curt, snarky, and disrespectful, I might have taken a different approach.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

In your estimation I am avoiding the question.
I stated my premises with regards to Jesus as the Son of God. That's my answer and it is not binary.
It's not just his estimation, but everyone's. Sorry, but there isn't a reasonable person on this board who could read your non-answer and claim you're not avoiding the question. That is exactly what you're doing and what you always do. You're being intellectually dishonest to suggest you've answered it.

The question of whether Jesus is God or not requires a simple yes or no. He either is he who says he is, or he isn't. Sure, we can debate what you believe a "God" is, but the answer to this question shouldn't be difficult for any Christian.

And the fact you cannot provide a straight answer to what should be a simple question for any person who calls themselves "Christian" speaks volumes.
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Mothra said:

Realitybites said:

Mothra said:

'll take a shot at this, as the answer is pretty simple.

We ask other believers and brothers in Christ to pray for us because they are 1) believers; and 2) alive. See James 5:16.

Praying to a long dead mortal is like praying to your long dead drinking buddy. It's worthless.


"And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?" (John 11:26)

So if you simply take what Jesus says at face value, you realize that those whose physical bodies have fallen asleep in the Lord are not dead. So the parallel of praying to a long dead mortal/long dead drinking buddy has absolutely zero relevance to the Christian who has passed into the afterlife.

It's sad that when so many modernists and believers in scientism respond to this question, they tell Jesus "Actually, no I don't. I'm more of a gnostic. The body doesn't mean anything, we cremate it usually, and move on after a memorial service instead of a funeral. Ashes to ashes and all, don't ya know."



After which he says "But I would not have you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning them which are asleep, that ye sorrow not, even as others which have no hope."(1st Thessalonians 4:13).
Your reasoning here is pretty disingenuous, but I guess when you have no scripture to support your practice, trying to mischaracterize your opponents' position is all you got. Let me help you:

As any reasonable person reading my post clearly understood, I was referring to the mortal body, which does indeed die (unless you're Enoch or Elijah). See Genesis 3:19. God, in Genesis, describes physical death as an act of mercy. See Genesis 3:22. And of course, scripture clearly distinguishes between the mortal body and the spiritual one. See 1 Thessalonians 5:23. The idea that this is a "modernist" or "gnostic" view is pretty remarkable, it's so ill-informed.

While I was pointing out the clear and obvious logical errors in freedombear's analogy, the big picture problem with praying to long (physically) dead mortals is there is no evidence in scripture that their spirits can 1) answer our prayers; or 2) hear them.

Sorry for destroying your misguided and unscriptural belief on this subject.
Careful now. Speaking biblical truth around here is gonna get you accused of being a know-it-all who doesn't want to learn anything, who "strips people of their humanity".
If his response hadn't been so curt, snarky, and disrespectful, I might have taken a different approach.
Trust me, I know the feeling.
BUDOS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You may have a valid point, and perhaps I am the problem. I will attempt to do better. I do enjoy reading the various posts, as some cause me to rethink my own opinions and even beliefs, while others add to my personal knowledge. Presenting some of the comments to my Bible study class has often been a blessing.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

But a lot of people did die from Covid, right? Why can't cancelling worship services for a temporary period be viewed as caring for the well-being of the congregants? Why does it have to be viewed as some sinister plot to join with the "woke" secular world?


All I can speak to is my church. It did not cancel services, it did not mask, it did not change its method of communion or stop it, it did not social distance, it did not change its form of worship. It also did not lose one parishoner, and doubled in size.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

In your estimation I am avoiding the question.
I stated my premises with regards to Jesus as the Son of God. That's my answer and it is not binary.
like I said, cop out

Why Immanuel?
BUDOS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We did vote to close after a bit and have never recovered. Some neighboring churches have permanently closed.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUDOS said:

We did vote to close after a bit and have never recovered. Some neighboring churches have permanently closed.

We closed, went online and reopened. Have since added a second service. Waco area FBC in a growing community.
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Fre3dombear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Fre3dombear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Realitybites said:

Harrison Bergeron said:


Anyway, curious everyone's thoughts ... realize much of worship since the Psalms is man-made and we all have opinions. Wish there was a way to keep the best of innovation and the best of the past.


Orthopraxy has entered the chat.

Innovation *is* the problem. There is no best of it. What you end up in is a perpeual cycle cultural compromise in which the faith once delivered to the saints is diluted to the point of becoming moralistic therapeutic deism.

Ask yourself, if Saint Paul was to walk into your service, would he recognize the worship portion of the service as a Christian? The communion service at all? Or would he think he was in some pagan temple on Mars Hill?

What would St. Paul think of the innovation of bowing to and kissing images, and praying to people other than God and Jesus?



What are examples of praying to people other than God or Jesus?
Quote:

Personally I generally think when we get our judgement God will say "I made it so easy and yet y'all complicated all of it"

I'd prefer to try to follow in the footsteps of those that walked with Jesus and founded the early church than guess at some "innovations" that were come up with 1000 or more years after Jesus walked the earth.

Now if innovation means how best to try to bring people to Christ, we'll, we all know Jesus himself was a huge innovator for his day as it is written.
If this is what you believe, then you most certainly should reject the teaching of icon veneration by the Orthodox and Roman Catholic churches, among many others, like praying to Mary and the saints.


Why would praying to the mother of God be an issue or praying to a saint when you'd ask your lowly mortal beer buddy to pray for a sick relative? That's an odd take. Good luck.
I'll take a shot at this, as the answer is pretty simple.

We ask other believers and brothers in Christ to pray for us because they are 1) believers; and 2) alive. See James 5:16.

Praying to a long dead mortal is like praying to your long dead drinking buddy. It's worthless.


Well a whole ton of context on purgatory and many verses in revelation etc state otherwise

But at worst it's a waste of time and at best….

@mothra - if you have lost a parent or a grandparent etc, you've never prayed for them after their passing or asked them to pray for you or look out for you?

That'd be impressive to stick to one's guns if so. I did have a protestant buddy of mine tell me if someone hadn't been baptized they couldn't go to heaven. I said so what age do you baptize? He said of course when they feel called or generally around 8-12. I said God forbid your son is killed when he chases a ball into the street at the age of say 4. Where does he go?

His jaw dropped. Then I got no answer.

In the end many things we don't "know" definitively and of course so much deoends upon faith but it is interesting to see how the newer denominations reason things out vs the reasoning of the Catholic and orthodox faiths and makes for good discussion
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

BUDOS said:

We did vote to close after a bit and have never recovered. Some neighboring churches have permanently closed.

We closed, went online and reopened. Have since added a second service. Waco area FBC in a growing community.


How many mosques were banned from opening for whatever they call their thing?
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fre3dombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

BUDOS said:

We did vote to close after a bit and have never recovered. Some neighboring churches have permanently closed.

We closed, went online and reopened. Have since added a second service. Waco area FBC in a growing community.


How many mosques were banned from opening for whatever they call their thing?
No clue

For the next epidemic, we can cancel church and replace it with protest of lost souls
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

Fre3dombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

BUDOS said:

We did vote to close after a bit and have never recovered. Some neighboring churches have permanently closed.

We closed, went online and reopened. Have since added a second service. Waco area FBC in a growing community.


How many mosques were banned from opening for whatever they call their thing?
No clue

For the next epidemic, we can cancel church and replace it with protest of lost souls


We still found a way to get communion. It was fascinating what they cowed the majority of people to think and do.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fre3dombear said:

Mothra said:

Fre3dombear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Fre3dombear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Realitybites said:

Harrison Bergeron said:


Anyway, curious everyone's thoughts ... realize much of worship since the Psalms is man-made and we all have opinions. Wish there was a way to keep the best of innovation and the best of the past.


Orthopraxy has entered the chat.

Innovation *is* the problem. There is no best of it. What you end up in is a perpeual cycle cultural compromise in which the faith once delivered to the saints is diluted to the point of becoming moralistic therapeutic deism.

Ask yourself, if Saint Paul was to walk into your service, would he recognize the worship portion of the service as a Christian? The communion service at all? Or would he think he was in some pagan temple on Mars Hill?

What would St. Paul think of the innovation of bowing to and kissing images, and praying to people other than God and Jesus?



What are examples of praying to people other than God or Jesus?
Quote:

Personally I generally think when we get our judgement God will say "I made it so easy and yet y'all complicated all of it"

I'd prefer to try to follow in the footsteps of those that walked with Jesus and founded the early church than guess at some "innovations" that were come up with 1000 or more years after Jesus walked the earth.

Now if innovation means how best to try to bring people to Christ, we'll, we all know Jesus himself was a huge innovator for his day as it is written.
If this is what you believe, then you most certainly should reject the teaching of icon veneration by the Orthodox and Roman Catholic churches, among many others, like praying to Mary and the saints.


Why would praying to the mother of God be an issue or praying to a saint when you'd ask your lowly mortal beer buddy to pray for a sick relative? That's an odd take. Good luck.
I'll take a shot at this, as the answer is pretty simple.

We ask other believers and brothers in Christ to pray for us because they are 1) believers; and 2) alive. See James 5:16.

Praying to a long dead mortal is like praying to your long dead drinking buddy. It's worthless.


Well a whole ton of context on purgatory and many verses in revelation etc state otherwise

But at worst it's a waste of time and at best….

@mothra - if you have lost a parent or a grandparent etc, you've never prayed for them after their passing or asked them to pray for you or look out for you?

That'd be impressive to stick to one's guns if so. I did have a protestant buddy of mine tell me if someone hadn't been baptized they couldn't go to heaven. I said so what age do you baptize? He said of course when they feel called or generally around 8-12. I said God forbid your son is killed when he chases a ball into the street at the age of say 4. Where does he go?

His jaw dropped. Then I got no answer.

In the end many things we don't "know" definitively and of course so much deoends upon faith but it is interesting to see how the newer denominations reason things out vs the reasoning of the Catholic and orthodox faiths and makes for good discussion
No, there are no verses in Revelation or anywhere else in scripture that state otherwise. In discussions with my Catholic friends on their non-biblical practice of praying to dead relatives, they like you have referenced Revelation, and in particular 5:8 which talks about saints carrying incense, which are the prayers of man. But there are no verses in Revelation that state we should pray to the saints, or request that they take our prayers to God. It's an entirely man-made practice. And for the record, so is purgatory - made up by man. There is no mention of purgatory or anything like it in scripture.

No, I have never prayed to a dead parent, grandparent or any other relative. I have a personal relationship with Jesus, and I take my prayers directly to him, his father, or the Holy Spirit, although I do ask him to tell them "hi" from time to time.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fre3dombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Fre3dombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

BUDOS said:

We did vote to close after a bit and have never recovered. Some neighboring churches have permanently closed.

We closed, went online and reopened. Have since added a second service. Waco area FBC in a growing community.


How many mosques were banned from opening for whatever they call their thing?
No clue

For the next epidemic, we can cancel church and replace it with protest of lost souls


We still found a way to get communion. It was fascinating what they cowed the majority of people to think and do.


It was the first epidemic most of us have ever lived through as adults. Many of us trusted the government to shoot straight with us. Now, the government has zero credibility.

They complained about conspiracy theorist but their actions led to the largest creation of conspiracy theorist ever.

It will be years before the government and MSM has the trust of the populace, if ever.
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Fre3dombear said:

Mothra said:

Fre3dombear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Fre3dombear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Realitybites said:

Harrison Bergeron said:


Anyway, curious everyone's thoughts ... realize much of worship since the Psalms is man-made and we all have opinions. Wish there was a way to keep the best of innovation and the best of the past.


Orthopraxy has entered the chat.

Innovation *is* the problem. There is no best of it. What you end up in is a perpeual cycle cultural compromise in which the faith once delivered to the saints is diluted to the point of becoming moralistic therapeutic deism.

Ask yourself, if Saint Paul was to walk into your service, would he recognize the worship portion of the service as a Christian? The communion service at all? Or would he think he was in some pagan temple on Mars Hill?

What would St. Paul think of the innovation of bowing to and kissing images, and praying to people other than God and Jesus?



What are examples of praying to people other than God or Jesus?
Quote:

Personally I generally think when we get our judgement God will say "I made it so easy and yet y'all complicated all of it"

I'd prefer to try to follow in the footsteps of those that walked with Jesus and founded the early church than guess at some "innovations" that were come up with 1000 or more years after Jesus walked the earth.

Now if innovation means how best to try to bring people to Christ, we'll, we all know Jesus himself was a huge innovator for his day as it is written.
If this is what you believe, then you most certainly should reject the teaching of icon veneration by the Orthodox and Roman Catholic churches, among many others, like praying to Mary and the saints.


Why would praying to the mother of God be an issue or praying to a saint when you'd ask your lowly mortal beer buddy to pray for a sick relative? That's an odd take. Good luck.
I'll take a shot at this, as the answer is pretty simple.

We ask other believers and brothers in Christ to pray for us because they are 1) believers; and 2) alive. See James 5:16.

Praying to a long dead mortal is like praying to your long dead drinking buddy. It's worthless.


Well a whole ton of context on purgatory and many verses in revelation etc state otherwise

But at worst it's a waste of time and at best….

@mothra - if you have lost a parent or a grandparent etc, you've never prayed for them after their passing or asked them to pray for you or look out for you?

That'd be impressive to stick to one's guns if so. I did have a protestant buddy of mine tell me if someone hadn't been baptized they couldn't go to heaven. I said so what age do you baptize? He said of course when they feel called or generally around 8-12. I said God forbid your son is killed when he chases a ball into the street at the age of say 4. Where does he go?

His jaw dropped. Then I got no answer.

In the end many things we don't "know" definitively and of course so much deoends upon faith but it is interesting to see how the newer denominations reason things out vs the reasoning of the Catholic and orthodox faiths and makes for good discussion
No, there are no verses in Revelation or anywhere else in scripture that state otherwise. In discussions with my Catholic friends on their non-biblical practice of praying to dead relatives, they like you have referenced Revelation, and in particular 5:8 which talks about saints carrying incense, which are the prayers of man. But there are no verses in Revelation that state we should pray to the saints, or request that they take our prayers to God. It's an entirely man-made practice. And for the record, so is purgatory - made up by man. There is no mention of purgatory or anything like it in scripture.

No, I have never prayed to a dead parent, grandparent or any other relative. I have a personal relationship with Jesus, and I take my prayers directly to him, his father, or the Holy Spirit, although I do ask him to tell them "hi" from time to time.


This is of course incorrect. But you just saying so doesn't make your opinion correct. And of course it's not only revelations. And even in revelations where do those prayers come from and who are they for?

Btw do Protestants believe in guardian angels? What is their opinion there?

Wow Interesting. So a Protestant would never say "God, please forgive memaw for all her sins? God please let mermar be in Heave with you. I prayed for her eternal salvation and that you have mercy in my meemaw". A protestant would never do that because their dead and it's worthless?

That sounds rather sad if true. Is it because they think it's a sin to pray for them? Or what do they believe is the harm to their own soul to do so?
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

Fre3dombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Fre3dombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

BUDOS said:

We did vote to close after a bit and have never recovered. Some neighboring churches have permanently closed.

We closed, went online and reopened. Have since added a second service. Waco area FBC in a growing community.


How many mosques were banned from opening for whatever they call their thing?
No clue

For the next epidemic, we can cancel church and replace it with protest of lost souls


We still found a way to get communion. It was fascinating what they cowed the majority of people to think and do.


It was the first epidemic most of us have ever lived through as adults. Many of us trusted the government to shoot straight with us. Now, the government has zero credibility.

They complained about conspiracy theorist but their actions led to the largest creation of conspiracy theorist ever.

It will be years before the government and MSM has the trust of the populace, if ever.


Hopefully very few trusted the govt. if so they hadn't been paying attention I guess.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fre3dombear said:

Mothra said:

Fre3dombear said:

Mothra said:

Fre3dombear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Fre3dombear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Realitybites said:

Harrison Bergeron said:


Anyway, curious everyone's thoughts ... realize much of worship since the Psalms is man-made and we all have opinions. Wish there was a way to keep the best of innovation and the best of the past.


Orthopraxy has entered the chat.

Innovation *is* the problem. There is no best of it. What you end up in is a perpeual cycle cultural compromise in which the faith once delivered to the saints is diluted to the point of becoming moralistic therapeutic deism.

Ask yourself, if Saint Paul was to walk into your service, would he recognize the worship portion of the service as a Christian? The communion service at all? Or would he think he was in some pagan temple on Mars Hill?

What would St. Paul think of the innovation of bowing to and kissing images, and praying to people other than God and Jesus?



What are examples of praying to people other than God or Jesus?
Quote:

Personally I generally think when we get our judgement God will say "I made it so easy and yet y'all complicated all of it"

I'd prefer to try to follow in the footsteps of those that walked with Jesus and founded the early church than guess at some "innovations" that were come up with 1000 or more years after Jesus walked the earth.

Now if innovation means how best to try to bring people to Christ, we'll, we all know Jesus himself was a huge innovator for his day as it is written.
If this is what you believe, then you most certainly should reject the teaching of icon veneration by the Orthodox and Roman Catholic churches, among many others, like praying to Mary and the saints.


Why would praying to the mother of God be an issue or praying to a saint when you'd ask your lowly mortal beer buddy to pray for a sick relative? That's an odd take. Good luck.
I'll take a shot at this, as the answer is pretty simple.

We ask other believers and brothers in Christ to pray for us because they are 1) believers; and 2) alive. See James 5:16.

Praying to a long dead mortal is like praying to your long dead drinking buddy. It's worthless.


Well a whole ton of context on purgatory and many verses in revelation etc state otherwise

But at worst it's a waste of time and at best….

@mothra - if you have lost a parent or a grandparent etc, you've never prayed for them after their passing or asked them to pray for you or look out for you?

That'd be impressive to stick to one's guns if so. I did have a protestant buddy of mine tell me if someone hadn't been baptized they couldn't go to heaven. I said so what age do you baptize? He said of course when they feel called or generally around 8-12. I said God forbid your son is killed when he chases a ball into the street at the age of say 4. Where does he go?

His jaw dropped. Then I got no answer.

In the end many things we don't "know" definitively and of course so much deoends upon faith but it is interesting to see how the newer denominations reason things out vs the reasoning of the Catholic and orthodox faiths and makes for good discussion
No, there are no verses in Revelation or anywhere else in scripture that state otherwise. In discussions with my Catholic friends on their non-biblical practice of praying to dead relatives, they like you have referenced Revelation, and in particular 5:8 which talks about saints carrying incense, which are the prayers of man. But there are no verses in Revelation that state we should pray to the saints, or request that they take our prayers to God. It's an entirely man-made practice. And for the record, so is purgatory - made up by man. There is no mention of purgatory or anything like it in scripture.

No, I have never prayed to a dead parent, grandparent or any other relative. I have a personal relationship with Jesus, and I take my prayers directly to him, his father, or the Holy Spirit, although I do ask him to tell them "hi" from time to time.


This is of course incorrect. But you just saying so doesn't make your opinion correct.

Btw do Protestants believe in guardian angels? What is their opinion there?

Interesting. So a Protestant would never say "God, please forgive memaw for all her sins?"

That sounds rather sad if true. Is it because they think it's a sin to pray for them? Or what do they believe is the harm to their own soul to do so?
Feel free to post the scriptural support for your position, if you are able. What specific verses talk about praying to saints?

As for what "Protestants" believe, there is as much divergence among Protestants as there is between Catholics and Protestants, so I can't say what "Protestants" believe. I can say our church believes in angels and guardian angels, as that is scriptural. I can also say our church doesn't believe baptism is necessary for salvation, as there is no scriptural support for that position. That said, there is also no scriptural support for infant baptism.

No, a protestant would never say forgive a dead person for their sins. Once they're dead, it's too late for them. And yes, it is sad. That is why telling others about Jesus is so important to Jesus. Once they're dead, it's too late.

All of what I told you is strongly supported by scripture. I would suggest doing some research before you accept Catholic dogma as the Gospel.
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Fre3dombear said:

Mothra said:

Fre3dombear said:

Mothra said:

Fre3dombear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Fre3dombear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Realitybites said:

Harrison Bergeron said:


Anyway, curious everyone's thoughts ... realize much of worship since the Psalms is man-made and we all have opinions. Wish there was a way to keep the best of innovation and the best of the past.


Orthopraxy has entered the chat.

Innovation *is* the problem. There is no best of it. What you end up in is a perpeual cycle cultural compromise in which the faith once delivered to the saints is diluted to the point of becoming moralistic therapeutic deism.

Ask yourself, if Saint Paul was to walk into your service, would he recognize the worship portion of the service as a Christian? The communion service at all? Or would he think he was in some pagan temple on Mars Hill?

What would St. Paul think of the innovation of bowing to and kissing images, and praying to people other than God and Jesus?



What are examples of praying to people other than God or Jesus?
Quote:

Personally I generally think when we get our judgement God will say "I made it so easy and yet y'all complicated all of it"

I'd prefer to try to follow in the footsteps of those that walked with Jesus and founded the early church than guess at some "innovations" that were come up with 1000 or more years after Jesus walked the earth.

Now if innovation means how best to try to bring people to Christ, we'll, we all know Jesus himself was a huge innovator for his day as it is written.
If this is what you believe, then you most certainly should reject the teaching of icon veneration by the Orthodox and Roman Catholic churches, among many others, like praying to Mary and the saints.


Why would praying to the mother of God be an issue or praying to a saint when you'd ask your lowly mortal beer buddy to pray for a sick relative? That's an odd take. Good luck.
I'll take a shot at this, as the answer is pretty simple.

We ask other believers and brothers in Christ to pray for us because they are 1) believers; and 2) alive. See James 5:16.

Praying to a long dead mortal is like praying to your long dead drinking buddy. It's worthless.


Well a whole ton of context on purgatory and many verses in revelation etc state otherwise

But at worst it's a waste of time and at best….

@mothra - if you have lost a parent or a grandparent etc, you've never prayed for them after their passing or asked them to pray for you or look out for you?

That'd be impressive to stick to one's guns if so. I did have a protestant buddy of mine tell me if someone hadn't been baptized they couldn't go to heaven. I said so what age do you baptize? He said of course when they feel called or generally around 8-12. I said God forbid your son is killed when he chases a ball into the street at the age of say 4. Where does he go?

His jaw dropped. Then I got no answer.

In the end many things we don't "know" definitively and of course so much deoends upon faith but it is interesting to see how the newer denominations reason things out vs the reasoning of the Catholic and orthodox faiths and makes for good discussion
No, there are no verses in Revelation or anywhere else in scripture that state otherwise. In discussions with my Catholic friends on their non-biblical practice of praying to dead relatives, they like you have referenced Revelation, and in particular 5:8 which talks about saints carrying incense, which are the prayers of man. But there are no verses in Revelation that state we should pray to the saints, or request that they take our prayers to God. It's an entirely man-made practice. And for the record, so is purgatory - made up by man. There is no mention of purgatory or anything like it in scripture.

No, I have never prayed to a dead parent, grandparent or any other relative. I have a personal relationship with Jesus, and I take my prayers directly to him, his father, or the Holy Spirit, although I do ask him to tell them "hi" from time to time.


This is of course incorrect. But you just saying so doesn't make your opinion correct.

Btw do Protestants believe in guardian angels? What is their opinion there?

Interesting. So a Protestant would never say "God, please forgive memaw for all her sins?"

That sounds rather sad if true. Is it because they think it's a sin to pray for them? Or what do they believe is the harm to their own soul to do so?
Feel free to post the scriptural support for your position, if you are able. What specific verses talk about praying to saints?

As for what "Protestants" believe, there is as much divergence among Protestants as there is between Catholics and Protestants, so I can't say what "Protestants" believe. I can say our church believes in angels and guardian angels, as that is scriptural. I can also say our church doesn't believe baptism is necessary for salvation, as there is no scriptural support for that position. That said, there is also no scriptural support for infant baptism.

No, a protestant would never say forgive a dead person for their sins. Once they're dead, it's too late for them. And yes, it is sad. That is why telling others about Jesus is so important to Jesus. Once they're dead, it's too late.

All of what I told you is strongly supported by scripture. I would suggest doing some research before you accept Catholic dogma as the Gospel.


Lol. I appreciate your suggestion.

Many of the things you posted are simply incorrect and we'll build this up over several posts. Had to chuckle at your suggestion though.

And fair point, I won't assume anyone is "Protestant" or Baptist. That of course is one of the challenges with 40,000 denominations of "Christian's" vs a 2,000 year old church like the Catholic faith.

One can drive down the road and just get a different opinion

That's not to say the Catholic faith doesn't have differences as it does and has had heretics, antipopes, etc.

Many even consider the current pop an anti pope and have many good reasons to believe so.

So yes, it's complicated but Much much more consistent across a couple billion people with an overwhelmingly consistent teaching
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Praying for the dead - now it may be that only Protestants don't do this as that seems to be the people most emotionally against it and most other faiths unanimously do do this.

When I've mentioned 2 Maccabees to them sometimes an non Catholic thinking themselves astute will say something like "that's not scripture".

What would you say to that example, as just one, since I shouldn't necessarily lump you in with others of faith I've discussed this with before?
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Angels / guardian angels - ok so you believe in guardian angels and angels. Wouldn't that imply they are aware of what you are doing? Would that not also imply, if you do indeed believe they exist, that they can in some way affect what is happening to you in this temporal world?

Do you believe in them but not call in them? Or what is their purpose to you?

Are angels above or below human souls in heaven?
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fre3dombear said:

Angels / guardian angels - ok so you believe in guardian angels and angels. Wouldn't that imply they are aware of what you are doing? Would that not also imply, if you do indeed believe they exist, that they can in some way affect what is happening to you in this temporal world?

Do you believe in them but not call in them? Or what is their purpose to you?

Are angels above or below human souls in heaven?

Angels are not our dead relatives. Angels are a separate creation of God's. Angels have never been offered grace.

When we die, we don't get our wings as Clarence did in the Christmas movie. If we are Christians, we get a crown!
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I recently had a nephew pass away. He did a lot of good things but he struggled for years with drugs and alcohol. He was living a horrible life at the time of his death. I know he knew what the gospel was but I've no idea if he ever accepted Christ as his Savior.

When I learned of his death I prayed "Lord, please let it be that ### was a Christian."

I'm Protestant and look at it like this-God exist outside of time. He has foreknowledge of all things including that I would pray that prayer. Did He answer that prayer, prior to it being prayed? I've no idea but, the Psalmist said "You know my thoughts before I think them. You know where I go and where I lie down. You know everything I do. LORD, even before I say a word, you already know it."

I would not describe my prayer as praying a relative into heaven but it was a sincere prayer.
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

Fre3dombear said:

Angels / guardian angels - ok so you believe in guardian angels and angels. Wouldn't that imply they are aware of what you are doing? Would that not also imply, if you do indeed believe they exist, that they can in some way affect what is happening to you in this temporal world?

Do you believe in them but not call in them? Or what is their purpose to you?

Are angels above or below human souls in heaven?

Angels are not our dead relatives. Angels are a separate creation of God's. Angels have never been offered grace.

When we die, we don't get our wings as Clarence did in the Christmas movie. If we are Christians, we get a crown!


I agree that angels are not our dead relatives. Angels also aren't humans in my opinion / understanding
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

I recently had a nephew pass away. He did a lot of good things but he struggled for years with drugs and alcohol. He was living a horrible life at the time of his death. I know he knew what the gospel was but I've no idea if he ever accepted Christ as his Savior.

When I learned of his death I prayed "Lord, please let it be that ### was a Christian."

I'm Protestant and look at it like this-God exist outside of time. He has foreknowledge of all things including that I would pray that prayer. Did He answer that prayer, prior to it being prayed? I've no idea but, the Psalmist said "You know my thoughts before I think them. You know where I go and where I lie down. You know everything I do. LORD, even before I say a word, you already know it."

I would not describe my prayer as praying a relative into heaven but it was a sincere prayer.


I would have no problem intellectual or theological issues with this prayer (as a non Protestant or a fellow human even). I am sorry for your loss and will pray for them as well.
Forest Bueller III
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUDOS said:

We did vote to close after a bit and have never recovered. Some neighboring churches have permanently closed.
So sorry to hear that. A good number of churches never totally recovered from Covid while others have bounced back even better than before.

In fairness to all the churches involved they never had to deal with something like it before. Those churches that were very technologically savvy seemed to fair pretty well.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fre3dombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Fre3dombear said:

Angels / guardian angels - ok so you believe in guardian angels and angels. Wouldn't that imply they are aware of what you are doing? Would that not also imply, if you do indeed believe they exist, that they can in some way affect what is happening to you in this temporal world?

Do you believe in them but not call in them? Or what is their purpose to you?

Are angels above or below human souls in heaven?

Angels are not our dead relatives. Angels are a separate creation of God's. Angels have never been offered grace.

When we die, we don't get our wings as Clarence did in the Christmas movie. If we are Christians, we get a crown!


I agree that angels are not our dead relatives. Angels also aren't humans in my opinion / understanding
I probably misunderstood what you were getting at. Sorry
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

Fre3dombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Fre3dombear said:

Angels / guardian angels - ok so you believe in guardian angels and angels. Wouldn't that imply they are aware of what you are doing? Would that not also imply, if you do indeed believe they exist, that they can in some way affect what is happening to you in this temporal world?

Do you believe in them but not call in them? Or what is their purpose to you?

Are angels above or below human souls in heaven?

Angels are not our dead relatives. Angels are a separate creation of God's. Angels have never been offered grace.

When we die, we don't get our wings as Clarence did in the Christmas movie. If we are Christians, we get a crown!


I agree that angels are not our dead relatives. Angels also aren't humans in my opinion / understanding
I probably misunderstood what you were getting at. Sorry


Maybe. No worries. Never meant to be any kind of Sanhedrin like gotcha question or comment. More just my own curiosity as a very learned student (with still much to learn and ponder) of my faith how other maybe like minded people (even if we're "different") think about things

I always tell people, be nice to your neighbor, when you get to Heaven you may be shocked they're sitting right next to you ha
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fre3dombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Fre3dombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Fre3dombear said:

Angels / guardian angels - ok so you believe in guardian angels and angels. Wouldn't that imply they are aware of what you are doing? Would that not also imply, if you do indeed believe they exist, that they can in some way affect what is happening to you in this temporal world?

Do you believe in them but not call in them? Or what is their purpose to you?

Are angels above or below human souls in heaven?

Angels are not our dead relatives. Angels are a separate creation of God's. Angels have never been offered grace.

When we die, we don't get our wings as Clarence did in the Christmas movie. If we are Christians, we get a crown!


I agree that angels are not our dead relatives. Angels also aren't humans in my opinion / understanding
I probably misunderstood what you were getting at. Sorry


Maybe. No worries. Never meant to be any kind of Sanhedrin like gotcha question or comment. More just my own curiosity as a very learned sumtudent if my farming how other maybe like minded people (even if "different") think about things

I always tell people, be nice to your neighbor, when you get to Heaven you may be shocked they're sitting right next to you ha


I'm certain we'd all be shocked if we knew who was in heaven and who was in hell
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fre3dombear said:

Mothra said:

Fre3dombear said:

Mothra said:

Fre3dombear said:

Mothra said:

Fre3dombear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Fre3dombear said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Realitybites said:

Harrison Bergeron said:


Anyway, curious everyone's thoughts ... realize much of worship since the Psalms is man-made and we all have opinions. Wish there was a way to keep the best of innovation and the best of the past.


Orthopraxy has entered the chat.

Innovation *is* the problem. There is no best of it. What you end up in is a perpeual cycle cultural compromise in which the faith once delivered to the saints is diluted to the point of becoming moralistic therapeutic deism.

Ask yourself, if Saint Paul was to walk into your service, would he recognize the worship portion of the service as a Christian? The communion service at all? Or would he think he was in some pagan temple on Mars Hill?

What would St. Paul think of the innovation of bowing to and kissing images, and praying to people other than God and Jesus?



What are examples of praying to people other than God or Jesus?
Quote:

Personally I generally think when we get our judgement God will say "I made it so easy and yet y'all complicated all of it"

I'd prefer to try to follow in the footsteps of those that walked with Jesus and founded the early church than guess at some "innovations" that were come up with 1000 or more years after Jesus walked the earth.

Now if innovation means how best to try to bring people to Christ, we'll, we all know Jesus himself was a huge innovator for his day as it is written.
If this is what you believe, then you most certainly should reject the teaching of icon veneration by the Orthodox and Roman Catholic churches, among many others, like praying to Mary and the saints.


Why would praying to the mother of God be an issue or praying to a saint when you'd ask your lowly mortal beer buddy to pray for a sick relative? That's an odd take. Good luck.
I'll take a shot at this, as the answer is pretty simple.

We ask other believers and brothers in Christ to pray for us because they are 1) believers; and 2) alive. See James 5:16.

Praying to a long dead mortal is like praying to your long dead drinking buddy. It's worthless.


Well a whole ton of context on purgatory and many verses in revelation etc state otherwise

But at worst it's a waste of time and at best….

@mothra - if you have lost a parent or a grandparent etc, you've never prayed for them after their passing or asked them to pray for you or look out for you?

That'd be impressive to stick to one's guns if so. I did have a protestant buddy of mine tell me if someone hadn't been baptized they couldn't go to heaven. I said so what age do you baptize? He said of course when they feel called or generally around 8-12. I said God forbid your son is killed when he chases a ball into the street at the age of say 4. Where does he go?

His jaw dropped. Then I got no answer.

In the end many things we don't "know" definitively and of course so much deoends upon faith but it is interesting to see how the newer denominations reason things out vs the reasoning of the Catholic and orthodox faiths and makes for good discussion
No, there are no verses in Revelation or anywhere else in scripture that state otherwise. In discussions with my Catholic friends on their non-biblical practice of praying to dead relatives, they like you have referenced Revelation, and in particular 5:8 which talks about saints carrying incense, which are the prayers of man. But there are no verses in Revelation that state we should pray to the saints, or request that they take our prayers to God. It's an entirely man-made practice. And for the record, so is purgatory - made up by man. There is no mention of purgatory or anything like it in scripture.

No, I have never prayed to a dead parent, grandparent or any other relative. I have a personal relationship with Jesus, and I take my prayers directly to him, his father, or the Holy Spirit, although I do ask him to tell them "hi" from time to time.


This is of course incorrect. But you just saying so doesn't make your opinion correct.

Btw do Protestants believe in guardian angels? What is their opinion there?

Interesting. So a Protestant would never say "God, please forgive memaw for all her sins?"

That sounds rather sad if true. Is it because they think it's a sin to pray for them? Or what do they believe is the harm to their own soul to do so?
Feel free to post the scriptural support for your position, if you are able. What specific verses talk about praying to saints?

As for what "Protestants" believe, there is as much divergence among Protestants as there is between Catholics and Protestants, so I can't say what "Protestants" believe. I can say our church believes in angels and guardian angels, as that is scriptural. I can also say our church doesn't believe baptism is necessary for salvation, as there is no scriptural support for that position. That said, there is also no scriptural support for infant baptism.

No, a protestant would never say forgive a dead person for their sins. Once they're dead, it's too late for them. And yes, it is sad. That is why telling others about Jesus is so important to Jesus. Once they're dead, it's too late.

All of what I told you is strongly supported by scripture. I would suggest doing some research before you accept Catholic dogma as the Gospel.


Lol. I appreciate your suggestion.

Many of the things you posted are simply incorrect and we'll build this up over several posts. Had to chuckle at your suggestion though.

And fair point, I won't assume anyone is "Protestant" or Baptist. That of course is one of the challenges with 40,000 denominations of "Christian's" vs a 2,000 year old church like the Catholic faith.

One can drive down the road and just get a different opinion

That's not to say the Catholic faith doesn't have differences as it does and has had heretics, antipopes, etc.

Many even consider the current pop an anti pope and have many good reasons to believe so.

So yes, it's complicated but Much much more consistent across a couple billion people with an overwhelmingly consistent teaching
Given you're a Catholic, I likewise chuckled at you laughing at the idea of actually posting scripture in support of your position. That's so very Catholic.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fre3dombear said:

Praying for the dead - now it may be that only Protestants don't do this as that seems to be the people most emotionally against it and most other faiths unanimously do do this.

When I've mentioned 2 Maccabees to them sometimes an non Catholic thinking themselves astute will say something like "that's not scripture".

What would you say to that example, as just one, since I shouldn't necessarily lump you in with others of faith I've discussed this with before?
So, Christians should pray to dead people because "other faiths" do it? Hmm. I am not sure that's a very strong argument in support of your position. Because the Muslims pray to the dead, we should as well?

As for 2 Maccabees, there is a reason that the Apocrypha are not included in most Christian bibles. I won't get into all of the reasons, but the lack of consistency with the other 66 books, and in some case completely diametric teachings, calls into question its reliability. While it does mention praying FOR people who have passed on, it doesn't mention purgatory, and that is literally the only place the idea of praying FOR the dead is mentioned in the Catholic Bible (yet another piece of evidence calling into question its reliability). It also does not say the dead can answer prayers, or that God will save them after death.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fre3dombear said:

Angels / guardian angels - ok so you believe in guardian angels and angels. Wouldn't that imply they are aware of what you are doing? Would that not also imply, if you do indeed believe they exist, that they can in some way affect what is happening to you in this temporal world?

Do you believe in them but not call in them? Or what is their purpose to you?

Are angels above or below human souls in heaven?
Of course I believe in angels. I haven't met a protestant who doesn't, so I am not sure why you are hyper-focused on this issue. Both the OT and NT are replete with examples of angels of the Lord who are his helpers on earth.

With respect to personal guardian angels that watch over us, while the idea of personal guardian angels is not explicitly referenced in Scripture, there are passages in Scripture that suggest their existence. Matt 18:10.

No, I do not pray to the angels. There is no examples of prayer to angels in scripture. We pray to God. Now, he may use his angels to assist us, but there is no evidence in scripture they hear or answer our prayers.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.