Porteroso said:
KaiBear said:
Porteroso said:
KaiBear said:
Porteroso said:
KaiBear said:
Porteroso said:
KaiBear said:
' Poor fisherman'
Gotta luv the internet.
What you love is killing them.
Clueless…..these 'poor fisherman' are well paid to smuggle poisons into the United States.
Poisons that contribute to the deaths of approximately 100,000 Americans each year.
Now at some rudimentary level even a 'bubble gal' is aware of this.
However it suits you to play games.
These are justifications for killing them right? Is it hard to explicitly admit you want these impoverished fishermen dead?
So you talk in circles about all the reasons we need to kill them?
On the coast of Venezuela?
While Trump pardons the ex President of Honduras convicted in the U.S. of....
smuggling cocaine into the U.S.?.??
ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND dead Americans ANNUALLY
Yet your tears are for their killers.
There is something really wrong with you.
Are these impoverished fishermen killing these Americans? Do these Americans really have no choice in this? No agency? Do you think they have zero responsibility?
And why can you not address the ex President if Honduras being PARDONED after being convicted of SMUGGLING COCAINE.
You are fishing for excuses to continue the smuggling of fentanyl into the US.
You are foolish
Always have been….always will be.
Blowing up a few boats is not going to have much impact. I have qualms on moral grounds, when we kill anyone, anywhere, without ample justification. I don't really care what international laws we follow, I care that we act in good faith.
So can you answer just 1 question? How are we acting in good faith, when we pardon a guy that has been convicted of smuggling massive amounts of cocaine into the United States? Do you not care about the hundreds of thousands of lives ruined?
It's a blockade.
Under international law, a blockade is an act of war. But we haven't blockaded the state of Venezuela. We've blockaded cartel shipments only. The Venezuelan state cannot cite it as an act of war without admitting that it is sponsoring narcotics trade.
Well played by the admin = using our strength in a narrowly targeted way which makes it difficult for Venezuela to muster any allies.
Ensuing air strikes will be an escalation, but again, Venezuela is obligated under international law to prevent their territory from being used as a safehaven for narcotics trafficking to other countries.
Hard for the cartels to sustain cash flow when their logistics are being degraded. They will weaken the cohesiveness of the Venezuelan regime. Again, shrewd policy at play.