cowboycwr said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

The_barBEARian said:

---

J.R. said:

---

That Cowgirl tart said it was domestic terrorism 10min after the incident. Eff ICE, Eff True, Eff Annie Oakley, Eff the Pole Dancer for conducting what will be a sham investigation with her puppet master pulling the strings. Everyone has seen the video. That chit should not happen in the US.. Every ICE Agent who stood by and watched and the one who told the Dr. he could not render aid as the lady lay dying should be fired today. ICE needs to GTFO of cities. If some. ICE thug were to come round my place , he'd get a Glock 9 shot over his head. The Minneapolis Mayor had it right . ICE. "Get the Eff Out". ole Hammerskin Hank and the rest of the jack booted Brown Shirts should go eff off tool. Roll the Tanks, Hank!

---

Were you this outraged when Ashli Babbitt got shot?

How is this any different?

If this was the FBI killing people over anti-Israel demonstrations or the IRS invading someone's home and shooting them dead bcs they didnt pay taxes to a corrupt government who doesnt represent them... I'd agree with the reactionary sentiment to fight to the death.

Instead, this is a dumb ***** was fighting ICE over the deportation of Somali con-artists who have stolen billions from the American tax payer.

Learn to choose your battles.

---

What is different is that the woman was shot trying to leave while Babbit was shot trying to enter.

---

Guess what - if you are being detained or given an order by a law-enforcement officer, you aren't allowed to simply ignore it and "leave" and you certainly aren't allowed to willfully to drive a vehicle at a law enforcement officer regardless of the speed of the vehicle. And it's just as much breaking the law as trying to forcefully enter a restricted building, facility, or area.

---

I didn't say she shouldn't be arrested.

Regular police deal with difficult people thousands of times a day, every day. Incidents like yesterday are exceedingly rare, becuase regular police are good at deescalating. ICE is the opposite. If you do not immediately obey the masked, ambiguously marked "law enforcement" they immediately ratchet up the intimidation. It is poor policing and it leads to results like yesterday.

Where do you think the woman was looking when she depressed the accelerator? I think she was looking at the guy to her immediate left trying to force his way into her car. Decent chance she never even saw the shooter, let alone "aimed at him."

---

Then she is even more of an idiot. You do not accelerate without looking in front of you. You don't drive but look to the side. That is car driving 101.

As to ICE not deescalating things that is because the paid agitators they are dealing with will not listen to reason or lawful commands.

---

ICE casues her to panic, shoots her, and then says-hey don't panic. Great logic. Professional law enforcement does not work that way. De-escalate first.

She should have been cited for a traffic violation and maybe arrested for evading arrest if she did not stop after moving her car. Shooting her was ridiculous.

Paid agitators? Thanks George Wallace.

---

Yes paid agitators. That is why these protests all start at the same time across multiple cities/states with the exact same professionally made signs, vests, radios, etc.

---

Well this paid agitator happened to live a few blocks from the incident. What a coincidence. Or maybe she was just concerned with what is going on her neighborhood.

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Bruisers Burner Phone said:

---

This is a terrible situation, and a tragedy. There's nothing to celebrate about anyone being killed in a law enforcement situation. But the job of law enforcement is really, really difficult already without agitators opposing them. The sheer irresponsibility of the elected officials in these towns in openly encouraging citizens to engage physically in opposition to officers is mind-boggling and the results are sadly very predictable.

---

That pesky First Amendment does allow freedom of assembly and expression. Deeply ironic that all the freedom lovers want to take away those freedoms.

---

Is someone burning a cross in your front yard freedom of expression? It's a form of protest and expression. Aren't you for those things?

---

No, its arson and trespass.

I've watched all four films. Took two hours to back them up, re-run them, stop in place, repeat as necessary to make sure I understood exactly what was happening. This was murder, plain and simple, and entirely avoidable.

90% of the people on this forum, haven't watched the videos, maybe more, or they wouldn't be saying the assinine **** they're saying.

This is a Warren-T Rat moment: "who you gonna believe, me or your own eyes?' You guys are choosing to believe the bull**** and refusing to open your own eyes.

This is another case where MAGa has lost its grip on reality.

Case in point-Waltz's order to the Guard is being viewed like he is gogint to sic them on ICE , some have pretended that he gave the order before yesterday's incident.

He did not. He gave the order after the killing because he may need them in case of riots. The order specifcially says they would be used to protect people and property. It is the exact same steps he took after the Floyd killing for which Trump praised him.

1713 Baylor said:

---

I've watched all four films. Took two hours to back them up, re-run them, stop in place, repeat as necessary to make sure I understood exactly what was happening. This was murder, plain and simple, and entirely avoidable.

90% of the people on this forum, haven't watched the videos, maybe more, or they wouldn't be saying the assinine **** they're saying.

This is a Warren-T Rat moment: "who you gonna believe, me or your own eyes?' You guys are choosing to believe the bull**** and refusing to open your own eyes.

---

That's a straight lie that's easily refuted by video. SHE HIT THE ICE AGENT BEFORE SHE WAS SHOT. You're simply lying.

1713 Baylor said:

---

I've watched all four films. Took two hours to back them up, re-run them, stop in place, repeat as necessary to make sure I understood exactly what was happening. This was murder, plain and simple, and entirely avoidable.

90% of the people on this forum, haven't watched the videos, maybe more, or they wouldn't be saying the assinine **** they're saying.

This is a Warren-T Rat moment: "who you gonna believe, me or your own eyes?' You guys are choosing to believe the bull**** and refusing to open your own eyes.

---

I assume they aren't lying when they say she had been encountered before.

Maybe not too long before......

Changes things for me.

She was out looking for a conflict - and she found one.

- UF

Anyway - stupid way to go.

D!

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Bruisers Burner Phone said:

---

This is a terrible situation, and a tragedy. There's nothing to celebrate about anyone being killed in a law enforcement situation. But the job of law enforcement is really, really difficult already without agitators opposing them. The sheer irresponsibility of the elected officials in these towns in openly encouraging citizens to engage physically in opposition to officers is mind-boggling and the results are sadly very predictable.

---

That pesky First Amendment does allow freedom of assembly and expression. Deeply ironic that all the freedom lovers want to take away those freedoms.

---

Is someone burning a cross in your front yard freedom of expression? It's a form of protest and expression. Aren't you for those things?

She didn't get shot for her protest, nor for here position on a political matter.

She was blocking LEOs from their lawful duty. She then took a deadly weapon (vehicle) and accelerated towards a LEO. The officer responded in a legal manner.

Her freedom of expression and assembly ended at the intersection of the front bumper and LEO's person.

---

First, there was no intersection of bumper and person. Second, if there was, ICE caused it.

Again, look at the video I just analyzed. The victim made way for the ICE car and tried to wave them past her. ICE choose to aggressively engage her and the caused her to panic. Its obvious.

Wangchung said:

---

1713 Baylor said:

---

I've watched all four films. Took two hours to back them up, re-run them, stop in place, repeat as necessary to make sure I understood exactly what was happening. This was murder, plain and simple, and entirely avoidable.

90% of the people on this forum, haven't watched the videos, maybe more, or they wouldn't be saying the assinine **** they're saying.

This is a Warren-T Rat moment: "who you gonna believe, me or your own eyes?' You guys are choosing to believe the bull**** and refusing to open your own eyes.

---

That's a straight lie that's easily refuted by video. SHE HIT THE ICE AGENT BEFORE SHE WAS SHOT. You're simply lying.

---

Except the video doesn't refute it. Its hard to tell, but you would have us beleive that two officers who were not hit by an SUV slipped on the street but the guy who was hit didn't even budge?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/renee-nicole-good-minneapolis-ice-shooting-victim-caring-neighbor-rcna252901

Frank Galvin said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

1713 Baylor said:

---

I've watched all four films. Took two hours to back them up, re-run them, stop in place, repeat as necessary to make sure I understood exactly what was happening. This was murder, plain and simple, and entirely avoidable.

90% of the people on this forum, haven't watched the videos, maybe more, or they wouldn't be saying the assinine **** they're saying.

This is a Warren-T Rat moment: "who you gonna believe, me or your own eyes?' You guys are choosing to believe the bull**** and refusing to open your own eyes.

---

That's a straight lie that's easily refuted by video. SHE HIT THE ICE AGENT BEFORE SHE WAS SHOT. You're simply lying.

---

Except the video doesn't refute it. Its hard to tell, but you would have us beleive that two officers who were not hit by an SUV slipped on the street but the guy who was hit didn't even budge?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/renee-nicole-good-minneapolis-ice-shooting-victim-caring-neighbor-rcna252901

---

Deny this;

Wangchung said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Bruisers Burner Phone said:

---

This is a terrible situation, and a tragedy. There's nothing to celebrate about anyone being killed in a law enforcement situation. But the job of law enforcement is really, really difficult already without agitators opposing them. The sheer irresponsibility of the elected officials in these towns in openly encouraging citizens to engage physically in opposition to officers is mind-boggling and the results are sadly very predictable.

---

That pesky First Amendment does allow freedom of assembly and expression. Deeply ironic that all the freedom lovers want to take away those freedoms.

---

Is someone burning a cross in your front yard freedom of expression? It's a form of protest and expression. Aren't you for those things?

She didn't get shot for her protest, nor for here position on a political matter.

She was blocking LEOs from their lawful duty. She then took a deadly weapon (vehicle) and accelerated towards a LEO. The officer responded in a legal manner.

Her freedom of expression and assembly ended at the intersection of the front bumper and LEO's person.

---

First, there was no intersection of bumper and person. Second, if there was, ICE caused it.

Again, look at the video I just analyzed. The victim made way for the ICE car and tried to wave them past her. ICE choose to aggressively engage her and the caused her to panic. It's obvious.

---

Moronic. You don't get to run over an ICE agent because he ignores your demands to get out of your escape path.

---

She didn't run over an ICE agent. She didn't demand anything. She panicked when the advancing agent made her believe she was about to be dragged from her car and zip tied. Also, she was not blocking teh officers. Watch the video carefully and you will see she was trying to move her car when this started and that she asked them to drive around her. Its all on the video.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/renee-nicole-good-minneapolis-ice-shooting-victim-caring-neighbor-rcna252901

Frank Galvin said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Bruisers Burner Phone said:

---

This is a terrible situation, and a tragedy. There's nothing to celebrate about anyone being killed in a law enforcement situation. But the job of law enforcement is really, really difficult already without agitators opposing them. The sheer irresponsibility of the elected officials in these towns in openly encouraging citizens to engage physically in opposition to officers is mind-boggling and the results are sadly very predictable.

---

That pesky First Amendment does allow freedom of assembly and expression. Deeply ironic that all the freedom lovers want to take away those freedoms.

---

Is someone burning a cross in your front yard freedom of expression? It's a form of protest and expression. Aren't you for those things?

She didn't get shot for her protest, nor for here position on a political matter.

She was blocking LEOs from their lawful duty. She then took a deadly weapon (vehicle) and accelerated towards a LEO. The officer responded in a legal manner.

Her freedom of expression and assembly ended at the intersection of the front bumper and LEO's person.

---

First, there was no intersection of bumper and person. Second, if there was, ICE caused it.

Again, look at the video I just analyzed. The victim made way for the ICE car and tried to wave them past her. ICE choose to aggressively engage her and the caused her to panic. It's obvious.

---

Moronic. You don't get to run over an ICE agent because he ignores your demands to get out of your escape path.

---

She didn't run over an ICE agent. She didn't demand anything. She panicked when the advancing agent made her believe she was about to be dragged from her car and zip tied. Also, she was not blocking teh officers. Watch the video carefully and you will see she was trying to move her car when this started and that she asked them to drive around her. Its all on the video.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/renee-nicole-good-minneapolis-ice-shooting-victim-caring-neighbor-rcna252901

---

Complete horse ***** Have you zero integrity? I've given you multiple angles that shows she hit the agent before being shot. The same agents she had been harassing and blocking previously.

Wangchung said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

1713 Baylor said:

---

I've watched all four films. Took two hours to back them up, re-run them, stop in place, repeat as necessary to make sure I understood exactly what was happening. This was murder, plain and simple, and entirely avoidable.

90% of the people on this forum, haven't watched the videos, maybe more, or they wouldn't be saying the assinine **** they're saying.

This is a Warren-T Rat moment: "who you gonna believe, me or your own eyes?' You guys are choosing to believe the bull**** and refusing to open your own eyes.

---

That's a straight lie that's easily refuted by video. SHE HIT THE ICE AGENT BEFORE SHE WAS SHOT. You're simply lying.

---

Except the video doesn't refute it. Its hard to tell, but you would have us beleive that two officers who were not hit by an SUV slipped on the street but the guy who was hit didn't even budge?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/renee-nicole-good-minneapolis-ice-shooting-victim-caring-neighbor-rcna252901

---

Deny this;

---

I don't see the contact in the second angle. But even if she grazed him, it happened bcause ICE did awful police work. First, they should have just driven around her as she invited them to do. Second, they should not have rushed her car or cursed at her. Third, the shooter should never have been in front of the car in the first place.

Frank Galvin said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

1713 Baylor said:

---

I've watched all four films. Took two hours to back them up, re-run them, stop in place, repeat as necessary to make sure I understood exactly what was happening. This was murder, plain and simple, and entirely avoidable.

90% of the people on this forum, haven't watched the videos, maybe more, or they wouldn't be saying the assinine **** they're saying.

This is a Warren-T Rat moment: "who you gonna believe, me or your own eyes?' You guys are choosing to believe the bull**** and refusing to open your own eyes.

---

That's a straight lie that's easily refuted by video. SHE HIT THE ICE AGENT BEFORE SHE WAS SHOT. You're simply lying.

---

Except the video doesn't refute it. Its hard to tell, but you would have us beleive that two officers who were not hit by an SUV slipped on the street but the guy who was hit didn't even budge?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/renee-nicole-good-minneapolis-ice-shooting-victim-caring-neighbor-rcna252901

---

Deny this;

---

I don't see the contact in the second angle. But even if she grazed him, it happened bcause ICE did awful police work. First, they should have just drivenm around her as she invited them to do. Second, they should not have rushed her car or cursed at her. thrid, the shooter should never have been in front of the car in the first place.

---

Are you basing these opinions off of your law enforcement training?

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Bruisers Burner Phone said:

---

This is a terrible situation, and a tragedy. There's nothing to celebrate about anyone being killed in a law enforcement situation. But the job of law enforcement is really, really difficult already without agitators opposing them. The sheer irresponsibility of the elected officials in these towns in openly encouraging citizens to engage physically in opposition to officers is mind-boggling and the results are sadly very predictable.

---

That pesky First Amendment does allow freedom of assembly and expression. Deeply ironic that all the freedom lovers want to take away those freedoms.

---

Is someone burning a cross in your front yard freedom of expression? It's a form of protest and expression. Aren't you for those things?

---

No, its arson and trespass.

---

Those are felonies, just like using your vehicle as a weapon.

If she was harassing ICE previously, the same day or any other day and it is recorded, that may even be enough evidence to show intent/premeditation.

Being a professional agitator has its risk.

---

This is what her ex had to say about how she happened to be there:

Her ex-husband, who asked not to be named out of concern for the safety of their children, said Good had just dropped off her six-year-old son at school on Wednesday and was driving home with her current partner when they encountered a group of ICE agents on a snowy street in Minneapolis, where they had moved last year from Kansas City, Mo.

Her mom said this about her prtoesting activities:

Donna Ganger, her mother, told the Minnesota Star Tribune the family was notified of the death late Wednesday morning.

"She was an amazing human being," Ganger told the newspaper, adding she was "not part of anything like that at all," referring to protests against ICE.

What is your evidence of her being a "professional agitator/"

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

1713 Baylor said:

---

I've watched all four films. Took two hours to back them up, re-run them, stop in place, repeat as necessary to make sure I understood exactly what was happening. This was murder, plain and simple, and entirely avoidable.

90% of the people on this forum, haven't watched the videos, maybe more, or they wouldn't be saying the assinine **** they're saying.

This is a Warren-T Rat moment: "who you gonna believe, me or your own eyes?' You guys are choosing to believe the bull**** and refusing to open your own eyes.

---

That's a straight lie that's easily refuted by video. SHE HIT THE ICE AGENT BEFORE SHE WAS SHOT. You're simply lying.

---

Except the video doesn't refute it. Its hard to tell, but you would have us beleive that two officers who were not hit by an SUV slipped on the street but the guy who was hit didn't even budge?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/renee-nicole-good-minneapolis-ice-shooting-victim-caring-neighbor-rcna252901

---

Deny this;

---

I don't see the contact in the second angle. But even if she grazed him, it happened bcause ICE did awful police work. First, they should have just drivenm around her as she invited them to do. Second, they should not have rushed her car or cursed at her. thrid, the shooter should never have been in front of the car in the first place.

---

Are you basing these opinions off of your law enforcement training?

---

No. Most of all I have 64 years of experience on how you should treat people. Second, common sense says don't stand in front of a car if you think it is going to flee. But third, I defended cops in Section 1983 actions for a long time. You learn quite a bit doing that.

Wangchung said:

---

1713 Baylor said:

---

I've watched all four films. Took two hours to back them up, re-run them, stop in place, repeat as necessary to make sure I understood exactly what was happening. This was murder, plain and simple, and entirely avoidable.

90% of the people on this forum, haven't watched the videos, maybe more, or they wouldn't be saying the assinine **** they're saying.

This is a Warren-T Rat moment: "who you gonna believe, me or your own eyes?' You guys are choosing to believe the bull**** and refusing to open your own eyes.

---

That's a straight lie that's easily refuted by video. SHE HIT THE ICE AGENT BEFORE SHE WAS SHOT. You're simply lying.

---

Full bull***** Complete utter fabrication, a Lie's lie that can only be wrought from accepting the bull**** propagated by interested parties. In the fourth video (street view opposite), she is about to leave before the ICE agents ever arrive, but a car comes in front of her and she waives it past. Then more ICE agents arrive and approach.

In all three back view videos, when the first two ICE agents approach she puts the car in reverse to back away from them and re-angle the car toward the open street.

In all three of the behind view videos her front tires are turned away from Agents 1 and 2 and toward the street. It is agent 3, the shooter, who interposes himself in front of her car, then as she is beginning to leave, shoots her. She does not 'rev' the car, or aim it at him, she starts slowly and aims it away. By the time he shoots, Agent 3 (shooter) is nearly out of the way, and could have been out of the way and out of harm from the first second he became involved.

Not one of the agents is hurt. Not even in the slightest. "Will recover" what crap. They have nothing to recover from. All four are fully ambulatory. No 3 (shooter) continues to chase her. No one grabs a limb in pain or does anything else to illustrate even the possibility of an injury.

In fact, they're stunned that Agent 3 pulled the trigger. Agent 1 (rear behind the guy at the door) jumps at the shot it is so unexpected, and agent 4 stumbles and falls in surprise from it. Neither were expecting it, because no one would be under these circumstances.

The car proceeds down the road where it is aimed--away from all ICE officers.

In all four films there are no injured agents. None have fallen. None limp or show common reactions to the pain of an injury. All four are fully ambulatory.

WATCH THE ****ING VIDEOS BEFORE YOU CALL SOMEONE A LIAR PIECE OF *****

Frank Galvin said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

1713 Baylor said:

---

I've watched all four films. Took two hours to back them up, re-run them, stop in place, repeat as necessary to make sure I understood exactly what was happening. This was murder, plain and simple, and entirely avoidable.

90% of the people on this forum, haven't watched the videos, maybe more, or they wouldn't be saying the assinine **** they're saying.

This is a Warren-T Rat moment: "who you gonna believe, me or your own eyes?' You guys are choosing to believe the bull**** and refusing to open your own eyes.

---

That's a straight lie that's easily refuted by video. SHE HIT THE ICE AGENT BEFORE SHE WAS SHOT. You're simply lying.

---

Except the video doesn't refute it. Its hard to tell, but you would have us beleive that two officers who were not hit by an SUV slipped on the street but the guy who was hit didn't even budge?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/renee-nicole-good-minneapolis-ice-shooting-victim-caring-neighbor-rcna252901

---

Deny this;

---

I don't see the contact in the second angle. But even if she grazed him, it happened bcause ICE did awful police work. First, they should have just driven around her as she invited them to do. Second, they should not have rushed her car or cursed at her. Third, the shooter should never have been in front of the car in the first place.

---

You don't see his leg being hit? No, you don't WANT to see it. It's right in front of your face.

Wangchung said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Bruisers Burner Phone said:

---

This is a terrible situation, and a tragedy. There's nothing to celebrate about anyone being killed in a law enforcement situation. But the job of law enforcement is really, really difficult already without agitators opposing them. The sheer irresponsibility of the elected officials in these towns in openly encouraging citizens to engage physically in opposition to officers is mind-boggling and the results are sadly very predictable.

---

That pesky First Amendment does allow freedom of assembly and expression. Deeply ironic that all the freedom lovers want to take away those freedoms.

---

Is someone burning a cross in your front yard freedom of expression? It's a form of protest and expression. Aren't you for those things?

She didn't get shot for her protest, nor for here position on a political matter.

She was blocking LEOs from their lawful duty. She then took a deadly weapon (vehicle) and accelerated towards a LEO. The officer responded in a legal manner.

Her freedom of expression and assembly ended at the intersection of the front bumper and LEO's person.

---

First, there was no intersection of bumper and person. Second, if there was, ICE caused it.

Again, look at the video I just analyzed. The victim made way for the ICE car and tried to wave them past her. ICE choose to aggressively engage her and the caused her to panic. It's obvious.

---

Moronic. You don't get to run over an ICE agent because he ignores your demands to get out of your escape path.

---

She didn't run over an ICE agent. She didn't demand anything. She panicked when the advancing agent made her believe she was about to be dragged from her car and zip tied. Also, she was not blocking teh officers. Watch the video carefully and you will see she was trying to move her car when this started and that she asked them to drive around her. Its all on the video.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/renee-nicole-good-minneapolis-ice-shooting-victim-caring-neighbor-rcna252901

---

Complete horse ***** Have you zero integrity? I've given you multiple angles that shows she hit the agent before being shot. The same agents she had been harassing and blocking previously.

---

You can't be this stupid WANG Chung, so you have to be venal. It isn't a question of whether her car came in contact with the ICE officer. It did, though slightly, at a slow pace and I guarantee you if the medical reports come to light, leaving absolutely no injury. You ignore what happened before, and after. She was LEAVING. He shot her to keep her from LEAVING.

Look at the picture on the right of your own ****ing photo. He's already out of the way and backing off the car WHILE shooting.

1713 Baylor said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

1713 Baylor said:

---

I've watched all four films. Took two hours to back them up, re-run them, stop in place, repeat as necessary to make sure I understood exactly what was happening. This was murder, plain and simple, and entirely avoidable.

90% of the people on this forum, haven't watched the videos, maybe more, or they wouldn't be saying the assinine **** they're saying.

This is a Warren-T Rat moment: "who you gonna believe, me or your own eyes?' You guys are choosing to believe the bull**** and refusing to open your own eyes.

---

That's a straight lie that's easily refuted by video. SHE HIT THE ICE AGENT BEFORE SHE WAS SHOT. You're simply lying.

---

Full bull***** Complete utter fabrication, a Lie's lie that can only be wrought from accepting the bull**** propagated by interested parties. In the fourth video (street view opposite), she is about to leave before the ICE agents ever arrive, but a car comes in front of her and she waives it past. Then more ICE agents arrive and approach.

In all three back view videos, when the first two ICE agents approach she puts the car in reverse to back away from them and re-angle the car toward the open street.

In all three of the behind view videos her front tires are turned away from Agents 1 and 2 and toward the street. It is agent 3, the shooter, who interposes himself in front of her car, then as she is beginning to leave, shoots her. She does not 'rev' the car, or aim it at him, she starts slowly and aims it away. By the time he shoots, Agent 3 (shooter) is nearly out of the way, and could have been out of the way and out of harm from the first second he became involved.

Not one of the agents is hurt. Not even in the slightest. "Will recover" what crap. They have nothing to recover from. All four are fully ambulatory. No 3 (shooter) continues to chase her. No one grabs a limb in pain or does anything else to illustrate even the possibility of an injury.

In fact, they're stunned that Agent 3 pulled the trigger. Agent 1 (rear behind the guy at the door) jumps at the shot it is so unexpected, and agent 4 stumbles and falls in surprise from it. Neither were expecting it, because no one would be under these circumstances.

The car proceeds down the road where it is aimed--away from all ICE officers.

In all four films there are no injured agents. None have fallen. None limp or show common reactions to the pain of an injury. All four are fully ambulatory.

WATCH THE ****ING VIDEOS BEFORE YOU CALL SOMEONE A LIAR PIECE OF *****

---

Liar. Again, the video shows she HIT THE AGENT! You don't get to hit an officer of the law if it only hurts them a little bit, you idiot. She hit the agent with the car! It's on video! You idiot leftists have ZERO integrity.

1713 Baylor said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Bruisers Burner Phone said:

---

This is a terrible situation, and a tragedy. There's nothing to celebrate about anyone being killed in a law enforcement situation. But the job of law enforcement is really, really difficult already without agitators opposing them. The sheer irresponsibility of the elected officials in these towns in openly encouraging citizens to engage physically in opposition to officers is mind-boggling and the results are sadly very predictable.

---

That pesky First Amendment does allow freedom of assembly and expression. Deeply ironic that all the freedom lovers want to take away those freedoms.

---

Is someone burning a cross in your front yard freedom of expression? It's a form of protest and expression. Aren't you for those things?

She didn't get shot for her protest, nor for here position on a political matter.

She was blocking LEOs from their lawful duty. She then took a deadly weapon (vehicle) and accelerated towards a LEO. The officer responded in a legal manner.

Her freedom of expression and assembly ended at the intersection of the front bumper and LEO's person.

---

First, there was no intersection of bumper and person. Second, if there was, ICE caused it.

Again, look at the video I just analyzed. The victim made way for the ICE car and tried to wave them past her. ICE choose to aggressively engage her and the caused her to panic. It's obvious.

---

Moronic. You don't get to run over an ICE agent because he ignores your demands to get out of your escape path.

---

She didn't run over an ICE agent. She didn't demand anything. She panicked when the advancing agent made her believe she was about to be dragged from her car and zip tied. Also, she was not blocking teh officers. Watch the video carefully and you will see she was trying to move her car when this started and that she asked them to drive around her. Its all on the video.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/renee-nicole-good-minneapolis-ice-shooting-victim-caring-neighbor-rcna252901

---

Complete horse ***** Have you zero integrity? I've given you multiple angles that shows she hit the agent before being shot. The same agents she had been harassing and blocking previously.

---

You can't be this stupid WANG Chung, so you have to be venal. It isn't a question of whether her car came in contact with the ICE officer. It did, though slightly, at a slow pace and I guarantee you if the medical reports come to light, leaving absolutely no injury. You ignore what happened before, and after. She was LEAVING. He shot her to keep her from LEAVING.

Look at the picture on the right of your own ****ing photo. He's already out of the way and backing off the car WHILE shooting.

---

That's the dumbest defense offered yet. "She only hit the agent a little bit when she tried to run him over with her car!" Also, "leaving" while being detained is called "escaping."

Wangchung said:

---

1713 Baylor said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

1713 Baylor said:

---

I've watched all four films. Took two hours to back them up, re-run them, stop in place, repeat as necessary to make sure I understood exactly what was happening. This was murder, plain and simple, and entirely avoidable.

90% of the people on this forum, haven't watched the videos, maybe more, or they wouldn't be saying the assinine **** they're saying.

This is a Warren-T Rat moment: "who you gonna believe, me or your own eyes?' You guys are choosing to believe the bull**** and refusing to open your own eyes.

---

That's a straight lie that's easily refuted by video. SHE HIT THE ICE AGENT BEFORE SHE WAS SHOT. You're simply lying.

---

Full bull***** Complete utter fabrication, a Lie's lie that can only be wrought from accepting the bull**** propagated by interested parties. In the fourth video (street view opposite), she is about to leave before the ICE agents ever arrive, but a car comes in front of her and she waives it past. Then more ICE agents arrive and approach.

In all three back view videos, when the first two ICE agents approach she puts the car in reverse to back away from them and re-angle the car toward the open street.

In all three of the behind view videos her front tires are turned away from Agents 1 and 2 and toward the street. It is agent 3, the shooter, who interposes himself in front of her car, then as she is beginning to leave, shoots her. She does not 'rev' the car, or aim it at him, she starts slowly and aims it away. By the time he shoots, Agent 3 (shooter) is nearly out of the way, and could have been out of the way and out of harm from the first second he became involved.

Not one of the agents is hurt. Not even in the slightest. "Will recover" what crap. They have nothing to recover from. All four are fully ambulatory. No 3 (shooter) continues to chase her. No one grabs a limb in pain or does anything else to illustrate even the possibility of an injury.

In fact, they're stunned that Agent 3 pulled the trigger. Agent 1 (rear behind the guy at the door) jumps at the shot it is so unexpected, and agent 4 stumbles and falls in surprise from it. Neither were expecting it, because no one would be under these circumstances.

The car proceeds down the road where it is aimed--away from all ICE officers.

In all four films there are no injured agents. None have fallen. None limp or show common reactions to the pain of an injury. All four are fully ambulatory.

WATCH THE ****ING VIDEOS BEFORE YOU CALL SOMEONE A LIAR PIECE OF *****

---

Liar. Again, the video shows she HIT THE AGENT! You don't get to hit an officer of the law if it only hurts them a little bit, you idiot. She hit the agent with the car! It's on video! You idiot leftists have ZERO integrity.

---

Clueless ****ing clown. What is it going to take before you guys wake up? Does he have to eat a baby on the capital steps? In the last two days he's committed murder and fully supported it, and announced that he's going to steal hundreds of millions in oil revenue and place it under his sole control.

And I'm a lifelong Republican who's helped elect more Republicans than 99% of the people on this thread. The party I've known, been part of and proud of for two generations is gone and has replaced by a bunch of spineless sycophants like yourself who refuse to apply even the most minimal standard of behavior to the Clown.

1713 Baylor said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

1713 Baylor said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

1713 Baylor said:

---

I've watched all four films. Took two hours to back them up, re-run them, stop in place, repeat as necessary to make sure I understood exactly what was happening. This was murder, plain and simple, and entirely avoidable.

90% of the people on this forum, haven't watched the videos, maybe more, or they wouldn't be saying the assinine **** they're saying.

This is a Warren-T Rat moment: "who you gonna believe, me or your own eyes?' You guys are choosing to believe the bull**** and refusing to open your own eyes.

---

That's a straight lie that's easily refuted by video. SHE HIT THE ICE AGENT BEFORE SHE WAS SHOT. You're simply lying.

---

Full bull***** Complete utter fabrication, a Lie's lie that can only be wrought from accepting the bull**** propagated by interested parties. In the fourth video (street view opposite), she is about to leave before the ICE agents ever arrive, but a car comes in front of her and she waives it past. Then more ICE agents arrive and approach.

In all three back view videos, when the first two ICE agents approach she puts the car in reverse to back away from them and re-angle the car toward the open street.

In all three of the behind view videos her front tires are turned away from Agents 1 and 2 and toward the street. It is agent 3, the shooter, who interposes himself in front of her car, then as she is beginning to leave, shoots her. She does not 'rev' the car, or aim it at him, she starts slowly and aims it away. By the time he shoots, Agent 3 (shooter) is nearly out of the way, and could have been out of the way and out of harm from the first second he became involved.

Not one of the agents is hurt. Not even in the slightest. "Will recover" what crap. They have nothing to recover from. All four are fully ambulatory. No 3 (shooter) continues to chase her. No one grabs a limb in pain or does anything else to illustrate even the possibility of an injury.

In fact, they're stunned that Agent 3 pulled the trigger. Agent 1 (rear behind the guy at the door) jumps at the shot it is so unexpected, and agent 4 stumbles and falls in surprise from it. Neither were expecting it, because no one would be under these circumstances.

The car proceeds down the road where it is aimed--away from all ICE officers.

In all four films there are no injured agents. None have fallen. None limp or show common reactions to the pain of an injury. All four are fully ambulatory.

WATCH THE ****ING VIDEOS BEFORE YOU CALL SOMEONE A LIAR PIECE OF *****

---

Liar. Again, the video shows she HIT THE AGENT! You don't get to hit an officer of the law if it only hurts them a little bit, you idiot. She hit the agent with the car! It's on video! You idiot leftists have ZERO integrity.

---

Clueless ****ing clown. What is it going to take before you guys wake up? Does he have to eat a baby on the capital steps? In the last two days he's committed murder and fully supported it, and announced that he's going to steal hundreds of millions in oil revenue and place it under his sole control.

And I'm a lifelong Republican who's helped elect more Republicans than 99% of the people on this thread. The party I've known, been part of and proud of for two generations is gone and has replaced by a bunch of spineless sycophants like yourself who refuse to apply even the most minimal standard of behavior to the Clown.

---

The perfect response from someone spouting bull**** like you do. "Bububut...I'm weally a wepublican!!!" No one falls for that, you get that right?

Wangchung said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

1713 Baylor said:

---

I've watched all four films. Took two hours to back them up, re-run them, stop in place, repeat as necessary to make sure I understood exactly what was happening. This was murder, plain and simple, and entirely avoidable.

90% of the people on this forum, haven't watched the videos, maybe more, or they wouldn't be saying the assinine **** they're saying.

This is a Warren-T Rat moment: "who you gonna believe, me or your own eyes?' You guys are choosing to believe the bull**** and refusing to open your own eyes.

---

That's a straight lie that's easily refuted by video. SHE HIT THE ICE AGENT BEFORE SHE WAS SHOT. You're simply lying.

---

Except the video doesn't refute it. Its hard to tell, but you would have us beleive that two officers who were not hit by an SUV slipped on the street but the guy who was hit didn't even budge?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/renee-nicole-good-minneapolis-ice-shooting-victim-caring-neighbor-rcna252901

---

Deny this;

---

I don't see the contact in the second angle. But even if she grazed him, it happened bcause ICE did awful police work. First, they should have just driven around her as she invited them to do. Second, they should not have rushed her car or cursed at her. Third, the shooter should never have been in front of the car in the first place.

---

You don't see his leg being hit? No, you don't WANT to see it. It's right in front of your face.

---

It's not as obvious as you think, but watching it again, yes the second angle looks like she grazed him. Which changes nothing, He should not have been there, She likely did not see him, and the whole thing would have been avoided if ICE had simpley driven around her, which they had ample space, opportunity and an invitation to do. Or they could have just treated her as a human being and said calmly, 'ma'am we need you to move your car" or "Ma'am please step out of the car. We aren't going to hurt you."

Wangchung said:

---

1713 Baylor said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Bruisers Burner Phone said:

---

This is a terrible situation, and a tragedy. There's nothing to celebrate about anyone being killed in a law enforcement situation. But the job of law enforcement is really, really difficult already without agitators opposing them. The sheer irresponsibility of the elected officials in these towns in openly encouraging citizens to engage physically in opposition to officers is mind-boggling and the results are sadly very predictable.

---

That pesky First Amendment does allow freedom of assembly and expression. Deeply ironic that all the freedom lovers want to take away those freedoms.

---

Is someone burning a cross in your front yard freedom of expression? It's a form of protest and expression. Aren't you for those things?

She didn't get shot for her protest, nor for here position on a political matter.

She was blocking LEOs from their lawful duty. She then took a deadly weapon (vehicle) and accelerated towards a LEO. The officer responded in a legal manner.

Her freedom of expression and assembly ended at the intersection of the front bumper and LEO's person.

---

First, there was no intersection of bumper and person. Second, if there was, ICE caused it.

Again, look at the video I just analyzed. The victim made way for the ICE car and tried to wave them past her. ICE choose to aggressively engage her and the caused her to panic. It's obvious.

---

Moronic. You don't get to run over an ICE agent because he ignores your demands to get out of your escape path.

---

She didn't run over an ICE agent. She didn't demand anything. She panicked when the advancing agent made her believe she was about to be dragged from her car and zip tied. Also, she was not blocking teh officers. Watch the video carefully and you will see she was trying to move her car when this started and that she asked them to drive around her. Its all on the video.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/renee-nicole-good-minneapolis-ice-shooting-victim-caring-neighbor-rcna252901

---

Complete horse ***** Have you zero integrity? I've given you multiple angles that shows she hit the agent before being shot. The same agents she had been harassing and blocking previously.

---

You can't be this stupid WANG Chung, so you have to be venal. It isn't a question of whether her car came in contact with the ICE officer. It did, though slightly, at a slow pace and I guarantee you if the medical reports come to light, leaving absolutely no injury. You ignore what happened before, and after. She was LEAVING. He shot her to keep her from LEAVING.

Look at the picture on the right of your own ****ing photo. He's already out of the way and backing off the car WHILE shooting.

---

That's the dumbest defense offered yet. "She only hit the agent a little bit when she tried to run him over with her car!" Also, "leaving" while being detained is called "escaping."

---

Clueless. Helpless, hapless.

Wangchung said:

---

1713 Baylor said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

1713 Baylor said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

1713 Baylor said:

---

I've watched all four films. Took two hours to back them up, re-run them, stop in place, repeat as necessary to make sure I understood exactly what was happening. This was murder, plain and simple, and entirely avoidable.

90% of the people on this forum, haven't watched the videos, maybe more, or they wouldn't be saying the assinine **** they're saying.

This is a Warren-T Rat moment: "who you gonna believe, me or your own eyes?' You guys are choosing to believe the bull**** and refusing to open your own eyes.

---

That's a straight lie that's easily refuted by video. SHE HIT THE ICE AGENT BEFORE SHE WAS SHOT. You're simply lying.

---

Full bull***** Complete utter fabrication, a Lie's lie that can only be wrought from accepting the bull**** propagated by interested parties. In the fourth video (street view opposite), she is about to leave before the ICE agents ever arrive, but a car comes in front of her and she waives it past. Then more ICE agents arrive and approach.

In all three back view videos, when the first two ICE agents approach she puts the car in reverse to back away from them and re-angle the car toward the open street.

In all three of the behind view videos her front tires are turned away from Agents 1 and 2 and toward the street. It is agent 3, the shooter, who interposes himself in front of her car, then as she is beginning to leave, shoots her. She does not 'rev' the car, or aim it at him, she starts slowly and aims it away. By the time he shoots, Agent 3 (shooter) is nearly out of the way, and could have been out of the way and out of harm from the first second he became involved.

Not one of the agents is hurt. Not even in the slightest. "Will recover" what crap. They have nothing to recover from. All four are fully ambulatory. No 3 (shooter) continues to chase her. No one grabs a limb in pain or does anything else to illustrate even the possibility of an injury.

In fact, they're stunned that Agent 3 pulled the trigger. Agent 1 (rear behind the guy at the door) jumps at the shot it is so unexpected, and agent 4 stumbles and falls in surprise from it. Neither were expecting it, because no one would be under these circumstances.

The car proceeds down the road where it is aimed--away from all ICE officers.

In all four films there are no injured agents. None have fallen. None limp or show common reactions to the pain of an injury. All four are fully ambulatory.

WATCH THE ****ING VIDEOS BEFORE YOU CALL SOMEONE A LIAR PIECE OF *****

---

Liar. Again, the video shows she HIT THE AGENT! You don't get to hit an officer of the law if it only hurts them a little bit, you idiot. She hit the agent with the car! It's on video! You idiot leftists have ZERO integrity.

---

Clueless ****ing clown. What is it going to take before you guys wake up? Does he have to eat a baby on the capital steps? In the last two days he's committed murder and fully supported it, and announced that he's going to steal hundreds of millions in oil revenue and place it under his sole control.

And I'm a lifelong Republican who's helped elect more Republicans than 99% of the people on this thread. The party I've known, been part of and proud of for two generations is gone and has replaced by a bunch of spineless sycophants like yourself who refuse to apply even the most minimal standard of behavior to the Clown.

---

The perfect response from someone spouting bull**** like you do. "Bububut...I'm weally a wepublican!!!" No one falls for that, you get that right?

---

Sure, presume to speak on behalf of an entire group you are utterly out of touch with.

william said:

---

>>
NEW: ICE confirms to
@FoxNews
they've arrested a Somalian illegal alien sex offender in Minneapolis who has a prior conviction in 2016 for 1st degree criminal sexual conduct for forcing a victim to perform oral sex on him multiple times. ICE says MAHAD ABDULKADIR YUSUF also has prior arrests for first degree assault and has an active warrant from 2024 for obstructing police.

ICE says they previously tried to arrest him at his apartment, but the building manager blocked ICE from entering and shielded the convicted sex offender. This time, they got him in a targeted operation.

ICE says: "Thanks to the sanctuary policies of Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, this dangerous criminal was free to prowl the streets and victimize Minneapolis residents for years."


<<

- UF

---

Great. That is exactly what they ought to be doing.

Frank Galvin said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

1713 Baylor said:

---

I've watched all four films. Took two hours to back them up, re-run them, stop in place, repeat as necessary to make sure I understood exactly what was happening. This was murder, plain and simple, and entirely avoidable.

90% of the people on this forum, haven't watched the videos, maybe more, or they wouldn't be saying the assinine **** they're saying.

This is a Warren-T Rat moment: "who you gonna believe, me or your own eyes?' You guys are choosing to believe the bull**** and refusing to open your own eyes.

---

That's a straight lie that's easily refuted by video. SHE HIT THE ICE AGENT BEFORE SHE WAS SHOT. You're simply lying.

---

Except the video doesn't refute it. Its hard to tell, but you would have us beleive that two officers who were not hit by an SUV slipped on the street but the guy who was hit didn't even budge?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/renee-nicole-good-minneapolis-ice-shooting-victim-caring-neighbor-rcna252901

---

Deny this;

---

I don't see the contact in the second angle. But even if she grazed him, it happened bcause ICE did awful police work. First, they should have just driven around her as she invited them to do. Second, they should not have rushed her car or cursed at her. Third, the shooter should never have been in front of the car in the first place.

---

You don't see his leg being hit? No, you don't WANT to see it. It's right in front of your face.

---

It's not as obvious as you think, but watching it again, yes the second angle looks like she grazed him. Which changes nothing, He should not have been there, Sshe likely did not see him, and teh whole thing would have been avoided if ICE had simpley driven around her, whihc they had ample space, opportunity and an invitation to do.

---

She was chasing and harassing ICE agents who were enforcing the law. ICE had every right to detain her. She had no right to run. She had no right to hit the agent with her vehicle.