Minneapolis ICE shooting

25,412 Views | 761 Replies | Last: 39 min ago by FLBear5630
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

Forest Bueller III said:

Wangchung said:

Forest Bueller III said:

cms186 said:

Whilst she probably shouldnt have tried to drive away, its blindingly obvious that she wasnt trying to murder any ICE officers, by the time the officer draws his weapon he is already by the side of the car and in no danger at all, its a really dumb and unexcusable escalation to fire his weapon in that situation and trying to paint the victim as a Domestic Terrorist is pathetic.

I agree with this. Also, the narrative she had followed them all day for hours and hours I don't buy.

She had just dropped her kid off at school. The shooting happened in the 9am to 9:30 am range. One eye witness was making breakfast across the street when she heard the commotion and came outside.

Should she have tried to escape them, no she should have complied.

Should the Officer posted himself in front of a vehicle, no that is against policy, he should have stayed to the side of the vehicle.

Should he have fired 2 shots into her head at point blank through the drivers side open window after any threat at all had passed him, absolutely not.

Should he have exclaimed "****ing *****" after those two shots emptied into her head, it just showed this was an emotional reaction, not a tactical reaction.

She had been in that street blowing her horn while her dyke wife blew a whistle for over 3 minutes before that confrontation happened and she hit a federal agent while trying to flee arrest. She looked right at the officer through her windshield before flooring it and hitting him.

The first part of your post is correct. They were messing with Ice agents. They should not have been.

The second part of your post is absolutely not a certainty. She accelerated after she slumped forward dead.
She cut her tires sharply away from him as well. That is clear as day with the correct angle being shown.




Yet she still hit him.

I truly think she was trying to leave but made 2 mistakes

1) did not gauge the distance from her car to the cop
2) did not gauge the severity of the ICE agents commands


Trying to leave??? Without her girlfriend/wife?
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller III said:

Wangchung said:

Forest Bueller III said:

Wangchung said:

Forest Bueller III said:

cms186 said:

Whilst she probably shouldnt have tried to drive away, its blindingly obvious that she wasnt trying to murder any ICE officers, by the time the officer draws his weapon he is already by the side of the car and in no danger at all, its a really dumb and unexcusable escalation to fire his weapon in that situation and trying to paint the victim as a Domestic Terrorist is pathetic.

I agree with this. Also, the narrative she had followed them all day for hours and hours I don't buy.

She had just dropped her kid off at school. The shooting happened in the 9am to 9:30 am range. One eye witness was making breakfast across the street when she heard the commotion and came outside.

Should she have tried to escape them, no she should have complied.

Should the Officer posted himself in front of a vehicle, no that is against policy, he should have stayed to the side of the vehicle.

Should he have fired 2 shots into her head at point blank through the drivers side open window after any threat at all had passed him, absolutely not.

Should he have exclaimed "****ing *****" after those two shots emptied into her head, it just showed this was an emotional reaction, not a tactical reaction.

She had been in that street blowing her horn while her dyke wife blew a whistle for over 3 minutes before that confrontation happened and she hit a federal agent while trying to flee arrest. She looked right at the officer through her windshield before flooring it and hitting him.

The first part of your post is correct. They were messing with Ice agents. They should not have been.

The second part of your post is absolutely not a certainty. She accelerated after she slumped forward dead.
She cut her tires sharply away from him as well. That is clear as day with the correct angle being shown.



Weird how the agent was hit before the gun shot then, huh?

That is your speculation from very unclear videos. There is a very clear video at a very good angle that shows he was not struck directly with the front of the vehicles, he may have bumped the side of it.


Bumped the side??? Sooooo struck.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

Jack Bauer said:

Forest Bueller III said:

Wangchung said:

Forest Bueller III said:

cms186 said:

Whilst she probably shouldnt have tried to drive away, its blindingly obvious that she wasnt trying to murder any ICE officers, by the time the officer draws his weapon he is already by the side of the car and in no danger at all, its a really dumb and unexcusable escalation to fire his weapon in that situation and trying to paint the victim as a Domestic Terrorist is pathetic.

I agree with this. Also, the narrative she had followed them all day for hours and hours I don't buy.

She had just dropped her kid off at school. The shooting happened in the 9am to 9:30 am range. One eye witness was making breakfast across the street when she heard the commotion and came outside.

Should she have tried to escape them, no she should have complied.

Should the Officer posted himself in front of a vehicle, no that is against policy, he should have stayed to the side of the vehicle.

Should he have fired 2 shots into her head at point blank through the drivers side open window after any threat at all had passed him, absolutely not.

Should he have exclaimed "****ing *****" after those two shots emptied into her head, it just showed this was an emotional reaction, not a tactical reaction.

She had been in that street blowing her horn while her dyke wife blew a whistle for over 3 minutes before that confrontation happened and she hit a federal agent while trying to flee arrest. She looked right at the officer through her windshield before flooring it and hitting him.

The first part of your post is correct. They were messing with Ice agents. They should not have been.

The second part of your post is absolutely not a certainty. She accelerated after she slumped forward dead.
She cut her tires sharply away from him as well. That is clear as day with the correct angle being shown.




Yet she still hit him.

I truly think she was trying to leave but made 2 mistakes

1) did not gauge the distance from her car to the cop
2) did not gauge the severity of the ICE agents commands


Trying to leave??? Without her girlfriend/wife?


yes, that is bizarre. Her GF says "drive baby drive". The victim panicked and made a fatal stupid decision.
I don't believe she intended to hit the ICE agent, she was trying to get away and panicked and f'd up.
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Assassin said:

Redbrickbear said:

"I am saddened and angry by what I am seeing unfold in Minnesota. After reviewing video clips, I think two things can be true at once: ICE must review this incident carefully to determine if lethal force was necessary. And Good appears to have purposefully driven into officers, violating the law by obstructing a federal enforcement operation, and faced an immediate, fatal consequence...

I'm especially frustrated that Minnesota lawmakers immediately condemned ICE officers for attempting to restore law and order to Minneapolis. It seems like they learned little from the costly aftermath of George Floyd's murder and are eager to whip up Minnesotans into a riotous state of reactive, angry people to defend their progressive ideology." -Nicole Russell. USA Today

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2026/01/08/ice-agent-minneapolis-shooting-enforce-law/88084377007/

She's a Texan, so she's making sense

It's amazing how just like that Democrats:
1. Oppose democracy
2. Support anti-government loons
3. Support insurrection

um....




That was not right but if that is an insurrection then we are in trouble if a group of people ever try an actual insurrection with their semi automatic weapons. I mean if unarmed people can almost overthrow our government in one day then we have no chance. No chance against armed insurrections .
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

Jack Bauer said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Assassin said:

Redbrickbear said:

"I am saddened and angry by what I am seeing unfold in Minnesota. After reviewing video clips, I think two things can be true at once: ICE must review this incident carefully to determine if lethal force was necessary. And Good appears to have purposefully driven into officers, violating the law by obstructing a federal enforcement operation, and faced an immediate, fatal consequence...

I'm especially frustrated that Minnesota lawmakers immediately condemned ICE officers for attempting to restore law and order to Minneapolis. It seems like they learned little from the costly aftermath of George Floyd's murder and are eager to whip up Minnesotans into a riotous state of reactive, angry people to defend their progressive ideology." -Nicole Russell. USA Today

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2026/01/08/ice-agent-minneapolis-shooting-enforce-law/88084377007/

She's a Texan, so she's making sense

It's amazing how just like that Democrats:
1. Oppose democracy
2. Support anti-government loons
3. Support insurrection

um....




That was not right but if that is an insurrection then we are in trouble if a group of people ever try an actual insurrection with their semi automatic weapons. I mean if unarmed people can almost overthrow our government in one day then we have no chance. No chance against armed insurrections .


The left obstructing ICE and law enforcement is on par with what many MAGAs did on January 6th. That's just the truth.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

cowboycwr said:

Jack Bauer said:

Forest Bueller III said:

Wangchung said:

Forest Bueller III said:

cms186 said:

Whilst she probably shouldnt have tried to drive away, its blindingly obvious that she wasnt trying to murder any ICE officers, by the time the officer draws his weapon he is already by the side of the car and in no danger at all, its a really dumb and unexcusable escalation to fire his weapon in that situation and trying to paint the victim as a Domestic Terrorist is pathetic.

I agree with this. Also, the narrative she had followed them all day for hours and hours I don't buy.

She had just dropped her kid off at school. The shooting happened in the 9am to 9:30 am range. One eye witness was making breakfast across the street when she heard the commotion and came outside.

Should she have tried to escape them, no she should have complied.

Should the Officer posted himself in front of a vehicle, no that is against policy, he should have stayed to the side of the vehicle.

Should he have fired 2 shots into her head at point blank through the drivers side open window after any threat at all had passed him, absolutely not.

Should he have exclaimed "****ing *****" after those two shots emptied into her head, it just showed this was an emotional reaction, not a tactical reaction.

She had been in that street blowing her horn while her dyke wife blew a whistle for over 3 minutes before that confrontation happened and she hit a federal agent while trying to flee arrest. She looked right at the officer through her windshield before flooring it and hitting him.

The first part of your post is correct. They were messing with Ice agents. They should not have been.

The second part of your post is absolutely not a certainty. She accelerated after she slumped forward dead.
She cut her tires sharply away from him as well. That is clear as day with the correct angle being shown.




Yet she still hit him.

I truly think she was trying to leave but made 2 mistakes

1) did not gauge the distance from her car to the cop
2) did not gauge the severity of the ICE agents commands


Trying to leave??? Without her girlfriend/wife?


yes, that is bizarre. Her GF says "drive baby drive". The victim panicked and made a fatal stupid decision.
I don't believe she intended to hit the ICE agent, she was trying to get away and panicked and f'd up.

And the fact that she was smiling while driving at the officer?
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

cowboycwr said:

Jack Bauer said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Assassin said:

Redbrickbear said:

"I am saddened and angry by what I am seeing unfold in Minnesota. After reviewing video clips, I think two things can be true at once: ICE must review this incident carefully to determine if lethal force was necessary. And Good appears to have purposefully driven into officers, violating the law by obstructing a federal enforcement operation, and faced an immediate, fatal consequence...

I'm especially frustrated that Minnesota lawmakers immediately condemned ICE officers for attempting to restore law and order to Minneapolis. It seems like they learned little from the costly aftermath of George Floyd's murder and are eager to whip up Minnesotans into a riotous state of reactive, angry people to defend their progressive ideology." -Nicole Russell. USA Today

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2026/01/08/ice-agent-minneapolis-shooting-enforce-law/88084377007/

She's a Texan, so she's making sense

It's amazing how just like that Democrats:
1. Oppose democracy
2. Support anti-government loons
3. Support insurrection

um....




That was not right but if that is an insurrection then we are in trouble if a group of people ever try an actual insurrection with their semi automatic weapons. I mean if unarmed people can almost overthrow our government in one day then we have no chance. No chance against armed insurrections .


The left obstructing ICE and law enforcement is on par with what many MAGAs did on January 6th. That's just the truth.

No, it's a lie Democrats use to pretend they aren't really bad people

In scale, harm caused and political influence used to prevent accountability, the Left is geometrically a greater threat and harm.

That is the truth.

That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Assassin said:

Redbrickbear said:

"I am saddened and angry by what I am seeing unfold in Minnesota. After reviewing video clips, I think two things can be true at once: ICE must review this incident carefully to determine if lethal force was necessary. And Good appears to have purposefully driven into officers, violating the law by obstructing a federal enforcement operation, and faced an immediate, fatal consequence...

I'm especially frustrated that Minnesota lawmakers immediately condemned ICE officers for attempting to restore law and order to Minneapolis. It seems like they learned little from the costly aftermath of George Floyd's murder and are eager to whip up Minnesotans into a riotous state of reactive, angry people to defend their progressive ideology." -Nicole Russell. USA Today

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2026/01/08/ice-agent-minneapolis-shooting-enforce-law/88084377007/

She's a Texan, so she's making sense

It's amazing how just like that Democrats:
1. Oppose democracy
2. Support anti-government loons
3. Support insurrection

And are also the chief force behind the Tren de Argaua fan club
"It always seems impossible until it's done." – Nelson Mandela
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

cowboycwr said:

Jack Bauer said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Assassin said:

Redbrickbear said:

"I am saddened and angry by what I am seeing unfold in Minnesota. After reviewing video clips, I think two things can be true at once: ICE must review this incident carefully to determine if lethal force was necessary. And Good appears to have purposefully driven into officers, violating the law by obstructing a federal enforcement operation, and faced an immediate, fatal consequence...

I'm especially frustrated that Minnesota lawmakers immediately condemned ICE officers for attempting to restore law and order to Minneapolis. It seems like they learned little from the costly aftermath of George Floyd's murder and are eager to whip up Minnesotans into a riotous state of reactive, angry people to defend their progressive ideology." -Nicole Russell. USA Today

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2026/01/08/ice-agent-minneapolis-shooting-enforce-law/88084377007/

She's a Texan, so she's making sense

It's amazing how just like that Democrats:
1. Oppose democracy
2. Support anti-government loons
3. Support insurrection

um....




That was not right but if that is an insurrection then we are in trouble if a group of people ever try an actual insurrection with their semi automatic weapons. I mean if unarmed people can almost overthrow our government in one day then we have no chance. No chance against armed insurrections .


The left obstructing ICE and law enforcement is on par with what many MAGAs did on January 6th. That's just the truth.


In terms of calling them riots then yes.

In terms of dollar amount of damage done…. No

In terms of length…. No

In terms of violence level…. No

In terms of that there are actual leaders on the left calling for their people to do it…. Then no not the same.

Also, there are clearly groups funding these riots. That is why the signs are the same across multiple cities.

That is why when they leave there is all sorts of stuff left behind that clearly was bought in bulk with money. Like when Antifa left a protest site in Portland and there were just piles of stuff left behind.

EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

Jack Bauer said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Assassin said:

Redbrickbear said:

"I am saddened and angry by what I am seeing unfold in Minnesota. After reviewing video clips, I think two things can be true at once: ICE must review this incident carefully to determine if lethal force was necessary. And Good appears to have purposefully driven into officers, violating the law by obstructing a federal enforcement operation, and faced an immediate, fatal consequence...

I'm especially frustrated that Minnesota lawmakers immediately condemned ICE officers for attempting to restore law and order to Minneapolis. It seems like they learned little from the costly aftermath of George Floyd's murder and are eager to whip up Minnesotans into a riotous state of reactive, angry people to defend their progressive ideology." -Nicole Russell. USA Today

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2026/01/08/ice-agent-minneapolis-shooting-enforce-law/88084377007/

She's a Texan, so she's making sense

It's amazing how just like that Democrats:
1. Oppose democracy
2. Support anti-government loons
3. Support insurrection

um....




That was not right but if that is an insurrection then we are in trouble if a group of people ever try an actual insurrection with their semi automatic weapons. I mean if unarmed people can almost overthrow our government in one day then we have no chance. No chance against armed insurrections .


There is at least one common thing between J6 and the 2020 riots and all the other leftist riots since, as well as a couple of assassination attempts. The reaction of leftist politicians that stretch the truth like taffy to try and spin each event as a positive for them.

J6 was an embarrassment to most conservatives. Those few hundred idiots set back the conservative causes by years. Name any leftist action that has caused any leftist politicians to admit embarrassment to the press.

As far as national democrats, I can only come up with John Fetterman, and I'm not so sure he can be classed as leftist. The Democrat leadership was noticeably weak or inflammatory in all the above listed events.

J6 was a riot that should never have happened. No crowd should have been allowed that close to the Capitol with such little preparation for security. There certainly should have been an all call for more officers and guards immediately upon seeing the growing crowd. It's unfathomable that our national government wouldn't have better contingency plans for that.
Even so, the morons who stormed the Capitol violently deserved prosecution.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BaylorFTW
How long do you want to ignore this user?
More out of control white liberal women engaging in man hating:

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1Aq5LJFihm/
BaylorFTW
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:



Texas and Minnesota are different.
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

cowboycwr said:

Jack Bauer said:

Forest Bueller III said:

Wangchung said:

Forest Bueller III said:

cms186 said:

Whilst she probably shouldnt have tried to drive away, its blindingly obvious that she wasnt trying to murder any ICE officers, by the time the officer draws his weapon he is already by the side of the car and in no danger at all, its a really dumb and unexcusable escalation to fire his weapon in that situation and trying to paint the victim as a Domestic Terrorist is pathetic.

I agree with this. Also, the narrative she had followed them all day for hours and hours I don't buy.

She had just dropped her kid off at school. The shooting happened in the 9am to 9:30 am range. One eye witness was making breakfast across the street when she heard the commotion and came outside.

Should she have tried to escape them, no she should have complied.

Should the Officer posted himself in front of a vehicle, no that is against policy, he should have stayed to the side of the vehicle.

Should he have fired 2 shots into her head at point blank through the drivers side open window after any threat at all had passed him, absolutely not.

Should he have exclaimed "****ing *****" after those two shots emptied into her head, it just showed this was an emotional reaction, not a tactical reaction.

She had been in that street blowing her horn while her dyke wife blew a whistle for over 3 minutes before that confrontation happened and she hit a federal agent while trying to flee arrest. She looked right at the officer through her windshield before flooring it and hitting him.

The first part of your post is correct. They were messing with Ice agents. They should not have been.

The second part of your post is absolutely not a certainty. She accelerated after she slumped forward dead.
She cut her tires sharply away from him as well. That is clear as day with the correct angle being shown.




Yet she still hit him.

I truly think she was trying to leave but made 2 mistakes

1) did not gauge the distance from her car to the cop
2) did not gauge the severity of the ICE agents commands


Trying to leave??? Without her girlfriend/wife?


yes, that is bizarre. Her GF says "drive baby drive". The victim panicked and made a fatal stupid decision.
I don't believe she intended to hit the ICE agent, she was trying to get away and panicked and f'd up.


You don't believe?

A trained agitator panicked? By smiling as she struck the officer?

Fantasyland much?
Limited IQ Redneck in PU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller III said:

cms186 said:

Whilst she probably shouldnt have tried to drive away, its blindingly obvious that she wasnt trying to murder any ICE officers, by the time the officer draws his weapon he is already by the side of the car and in no danger at all, its a really dumb and unexcusable escalation to fire his weapon in that situation and trying to paint the victim as a Domestic Terrorist is pathetic.

I agree with this. Also, the narrative she had followed them all day for hours and hours I don't buy.

She had just dropped her kid off at school. The shooting happened in the 9am to 9:30 am range. One eye witness was making breakfast across the street when she heard the commotion and came outside.

Should she have tried to escape them, no she should have complied.

Should the Officer posted himself in front of a vehicle, no that is against policy, he should have stayed to the side of the vehicle.

Should he have fired 2 shots into her head at point blank through the drivers side open window after any threat at all had passed him, absolutely not.

Should he have exclaimed "****ing *****" after those two shots emptied into her head, it just showed this was an emotional reaction, not a tactical reaction.

Wow.
I have found theres only two ways to go:
Living fast or dying slow.
I dont want to live forever.
But I will live while I'm here.
Limited IQ Redneck in PU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Forest Bueller III said:

Wangchung said:

Forest Bueller III said:

cms186 said:

Whilst she probably shouldnt have tried to drive away, its blindingly obvious that she wasnt trying to murder any ICE officers, by the time the officer draws his weapon he is already by the side of the car and in no danger at all, its a really dumb and unexcusable escalation to fire his weapon in that situation and trying to paint the victim as a Domestic Terrorist is pathetic.

I agree with this. Also, the narrative she had followed them all day for hours and hours I don't buy.

She had just dropped her kid off at school. The shooting happened in the 9am to 9:30 am range. One eye witness was making breakfast across the street when she heard the commotion and came outside.

Should she have tried to escape them, no she should have complied.

Should the Officer posted himself in front of a vehicle, no that is against policy, he should have stayed to the side of the vehicle.

Should he have fired 2 shots into her head at point blank through the drivers side open window after any threat at all had passed him, absolutely not.

Should he have exclaimed "****ing *****" after those two shots emptied into her head, it just showed this was an emotional reaction, not a tactical reaction.

She had been in that street blowing her horn while her dyke wife blew a whistle for over 3 minutes before that confrontation happened and she hit a federal agent while trying to flee arrest. She looked right at the officer through her windshield before flooring it and hitting him.

The first part of your post is correct. They were messing with Ice agents. They should not have been.

The second part of your post is absolutely not a certainty. She accelerated after she slumped forward dead.
She cut her tires sharply away from him as well. That is clear as day with the correct angle being shown.



That post is completely refuted by the officer's body cam.



bs. The officer that killed her was standing in front of her car recording her on his cell phone. He wasnt wearing or wasnt using his body cam. Video shows he was clearly standing on the side of the vehicle while he shot her in the head.
I have found theres only two ways to go:
Living fast or dying slow.
I dont want to live forever.
But I will live while I'm here.
Limited IQ Redneck in PU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Jack Bauer said:

cowboycwr said:

Jack Bauer said:

Forest Bueller III said:

Wangchung said:

Forest Bueller III said:

cms186 said:

Whilst she probably shouldnt have tried to drive away, its blindingly obvious that she wasnt trying to murder any ICE officers, by the time the officer draws his weapon he is already by the side of the car and in no danger at all, its a really dumb and unexcusable escalation to fire his weapon in that situation and trying to paint the victim as a Domestic Terrorist is pathetic.

I agree with this. Also, the narrative she had followed them all day for hours and hours I don't buy.

She had just dropped her kid off at school. The shooting happened in the 9am to 9:30 am range. One eye witness was making breakfast across the street when she heard the commotion and came outside.

Should she have tried to escape them, no she should have complied.

Should the Officer posted himself in front of a vehicle, no that is against policy, he should have stayed to the side of the vehicle.

Should he have fired 2 shots into her head at point blank through the drivers side open window after any threat at all had passed him, absolutely not.

Should he have exclaimed "****ing *****" after those two shots emptied into her head, it just showed this was an emotional reaction, not a tactical reaction.

She had been in that street blowing her horn while her dyke wife blew a whistle for over 3 minutes before that confrontation happened and she hit a federal agent while trying to flee arrest. She looked right at the officer through her windshield before flooring it and hitting him.

The first part of your post is correct. They were messing with Ice agents. They should not have been.

The second part of your post is absolutely not a certainty. She accelerated after she slumped forward dead.
She cut her tires sharply away from him as well. That is clear as day with the correct angle being shown.




Yet she still hit him.

I truly think she was trying to leave but made 2 mistakes

1) did not gauge the distance from her car to the cop
2) did not gauge the severity of the ICE agents commands


Trying to leave??? Without her girlfriend/wife?


yes, that is bizarre. Her GF says "drive baby drive". The victim panicked and made a fatal stupid decision.
I don't believe she intended to hit the ICE agent, she was trying to get away and panicked and f'd up.

And the fact that she was smiling while driving at the officer?

lol
https://abc11.com/post/protests-federal-video-operations-shootings-minneapolis-portland/18377617/
I have found theres only two ways to go:
Living fast or dying slow.
I dont want to live forever.
But I will live while I'm here.
BaylorFTW
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The lesbian partner is trying to commit another evil now with regard to the 6 year old son. The grandfather has been quoted as saying "There's nobody else in his life," Macklin said. "I'll drive. I'll fly. To come and get my grandchild." Source:
https://katiecouric.com/news/ice-shoots-woman-in-minneapolis/ and I've seen the same quote in a Star Tribune news article.

Nevertheless, the lesbian partner who has no biological connection to the child is saying:

"I am now left to raise our son and to continue teaching him, as Renee believed, that there are people building a better world for him," she wrote.

Article: https://abc11.com/post/protests-federal-enforcement-operations-shootings-minneapolis-portland/18377617/?userab=otv_web_player-461*variant_b_otv_dmp-1903%2Cabcn_du_cat_topic_feature_holdout-474*variant_b_redesign-1939%2Cotv_web_content_rec-445*variant_c_trending-1851%2Chp_banner-426*variant_a_control-1777

This is evil. The child needs normalcy and a fatherly influence not continue to be subjected to a woke social experiment. The child's needs should come before the lesbian's ego. This needs to become a bigger story.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You really need to read up on how body cams work.

That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Love wins again!!

Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I dont get pissing off your fellow citizens for your cause

BaylorFTW
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

Love wins again!!



She has every right to be there. This is America. If they don't like a free press, they can go on over To China. I would recommend the press reporters take a can of bear pepper spray.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BaylorFTW
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There is at least one sane white woman in Minnesota:

BaylorFTW
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:



One of the comments said send a hostage negotiator so the cat can be set free. HahaHa
4yrletterbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sooooooooooooooooo.
Limited IQ Redneck in PU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

You really need to read up on how body cams work.




You are right. I just assumed the officer tiutns it on when he was carrying out communication that had to do with any type of confrontation. Why was this officer using his cell phone? None of the rest of the 3 or 4 ICE officers were using their cell phones. Tell me o wise one
I have found theres only two ways to go:
Living fast or dying slow.
I dont want to live forever.
But I will live while I'm here.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh bro...

D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

Oh bro...




What a dumbass.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:




Millions just like her.

Dumb as grass.
In debt up to her ass.
Still looking for that 'perfect' relationship.
Reads only fiction.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BaylorFTW said:

Jack Bauer said:

Love wins again!!



She has every right to be there. This is America. If they don't like a free press, they can go on over To China. I would recommend the press reporters take a can of bear pepper spray.


Liberals are masters at controlling the narrative…and will ruthlessly enforce it at all times


Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:



"It always seems impossible until it's done." – Nelson Mandela
ShooterTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:

Redbrickbear said:





There is a missing check box...

"I'm interested in getting shot by LEO because I'm a ****** who attacks decent people and defends the worst criminals"

I hope they ALL check that box!
ShooterTX
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

Jack Bauer said:

cowboycwr said:

Jack Bauer said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Assassin said:

Redbrickbear said:

"I am saddened and angry by what I am seeing unfold in Minnesota. After reviewing video clips, I think two things can be true at once: ICE must review this incident carefully to determine if lethal force was necessary. And Good appears to have purposefully driven into officers, violating the law by obstructing a federal enforcement operation, and faced an immediate, fatal consequence...

I'm especially frustrated that Minnesota lawmakers immediately condemned ICE officers for attempting to restore law and order to Minneapolis. It seems like they learned little from the costly aftermath of George Floyd's murder and are eager to whip up Minnesotans into a riotous state of reactive, angry people to defend their progressive ideology." -Nicole Russell. USA Today

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2026/01/08/ice-agent-minneapolis-shooting-enforce-law/88084377007/

She's a Texan, so she's making sense

It's amazing how just like that Democrats:
1. Oppose democracy
2. Support anti-government loons
3. Support insurrection

um....




That was not right but if that is an insurrection then we are in trouble if a group of people ever try an actual insurrection with their semi automatic weapons. I mean if unarmed people can almost overthrow our government in one day then we have no chance. No chance against armed insurrections .


The left obstructing ICE and law enforcement is on par with what many MAGAs did on January 6th. That's just the truth.


In terms of calling them riots then yes.

In terms of dollar amount of damage done…. No

In terms of length…. No

In terms of violence level…. No

In terms of that there are actual leaders on the left calling for their people to do it…. Then no not the same.

Also, there are clearly groups funding these riots. That is why the signs are the same across multiple cities.

That is why when they leave there is all sorts of stuff left behind that clearly was bought in bulk with money. Like when Antifa left a protest site in Portland and there were just piles of stuff left behind.




^This.

The hypocrisy of the left knows no bounds. The reaction to the deaths of Babbitt and Good are hysterical in the hypocrisy. Not to mention the histrionics around "democracy" while LWNJ mouth breathers actively attack the actions of a democratically elected government.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.