Minneapolis ICE shooting

46,488 Views | 1370 Replies | Last: 59 min ago by boognish_bear
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

If this is the level we are setting to justify this shooting, then we need to ban concealed carry.


Was this a cousin or something?

Why do you care about some mouth-breather who got aired out defending Somali criminals and terrorists?

He gets my nomination for the Darwin Award but the year is still young.....

An American citizen who did not deserve this...


This is the future that "American citizen" was fighting for....

You don't know what, if anything, he was fighting for. All we know is that he was exercising his right to document the events. To condemn him on that basis is un-American.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

If this is the level we are setting to justify this shooting, then we need to ban concealed carry.


Was this a cousin or something?

Why do you care about some mouth-breather who got aired out defending Somali criminals and terrorists?

He gets my nomination for the Darwin Award but the year is still young.....

An American citizen who did not deserve this...


This is the future that "American citizen" was fighting for....

You don't know what, if anything, he was fighting for. All we know is that he was exercising his right to document the events. To condemn him on that basis is un-American.


You dont define what is or isnt American.

Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

If this is the level we are setting to justify this shooting, then we need to ban concealed carry.


Was this a cousin or something?

Why do you care about some mouth-breather who got aired out defending Somali criminals and terrorists?

He gets my nomination for the Darwin Award but the year is still young.....

An American citizen who did not deserve this...


An American citizen who decided supporting Somali terrorists was more important than the safety of myself and my family...

Did the Jan 6ers deserve what happened to them? Why it is only left wing terrorists are allowed to break our laws with impunity?

The J6ers were literally allowed to break our laws with impunity. They assaulted police officers and were pardoned to the last one.

.


The Left over reached and sent people to prison for crimes no worse than what they let leftists agitators and violent activists get away with during the BLM riots

So the consequence was that normal Americans lost faith that the justice they were handing out in Democratic packed DC courts was fair.

Remember that 90% of BLM charges were dropped by progressive DAs, mayors, and governors

And in some places it was 100%

[In most of a dozen jurisdictions examined, at least 90% of cases were dropped or dismissed. In some cities, like Dallas and Philadelphia, as many as 95% of citations were dropped or not prosecuted.
In Houston, about 93% of citations were dropped; in Los Angeles, about 93% of citations were not filed. The prosecutor's office in San Francisco dismissed all cases…
Officials did not file charges for nearly all low-level offenses, like disobeying curfews, while they most often pursued cases with strong evidence of more serious crimes, like assault or looting. Still, data shows that a majority of felony charges were also dropped]

That is what being allowed to break our laws with impunity looks like.

PS

Not to mention violent assaults on officers were chronically undercharged in the first place in these progressive controlled areas
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller III said:

Porteroso said:

They had already taken his gun, and were beating him, when one of them pulled a gun and executed him, from what is being reported. If true, it's a big mistake.

I don't want to be called a lib, but I always look for truth, not propaganda. The Trump administration will forward propaganda in this incident. They always do.

Saw the video from the pink ladies point of view and another closer point of view. I don't doubt the dude was carrying he was, but if you watch closely, a guy came up behind him and ripped a gun out of the guys waist/belt and ran away from the brawl moments before the dude was shot.

I can also say this, he did not brandish a weapon or when on the ground getting the hell beat out of him had no way to get to the weapon.

He also was legally carrying which has been reported by multiple Minnesota News agencies.
My son also carries and if he does will have a couple of loaded mags in his belt.

At some point folks on the right might wake up and understand the administration right now ain't right.

The biggest thing I can see here is they again are not allowing locals to investigate the shooting. Real professional need to investigate this, not the administration saying we have this and we will determine the truth.

But, I can see what you are saying about him being disarmed, it appears that one of the officers pulled a gun from him and fled right before the shots were fired.

Also, they say he approached officers with a 9mm. One of the very up close videos showed him directing traffic and then just to his left officers were throwing down a woman the man came up got down and was shielding her from getting beat. They then ripped him off of her, started beating the hell out of him, some other officer ripped something out of his belt and ran away as then about 6-8 rounds were unloaded into him.

Their narrative is bull*****



BS

If you are armed and you start fighting with a half-dozen officers, bad things are going to happen to you. One officer perceives you are trying to obtain his weapon, you are going to get shot. Many times. And it will by by law a justified shooting.

Do NOT fight with cops.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

If this is the level we are setting to justify this shooting, then we need to ban concealed carry.


Was this a cousin or something?

Why do you care about some mouth-breather who got aired out defending Somali criminals and terrorists?

He gets my nomination for the Darwin Award but the year is still young.....

An American citizen who did not deserve this...


This is the future that "American citizen" was fighting for....

You don't know what, if anything, he was fighting for. All we know is that he was exercising his right to document the events..


1. We don't know that he was there to just use his right to "document events"

He might have been there to fight or assault officers.

We need an investigation first to establish all the facts

2. We have a Press with Constitutional protections to document events. Citizens may do so as well but let's not act like he was needed to cover legal ICE arrests of illegal aliens.

3. He (or anyone else) can document events. But you cannot get into direct confrontations with legal officers or impede them in their official duties.

We will find out if he was after all the facts come out.

If he was then that is NOT protected behavior for a citizen
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

ScottS said:

Jack Bauer said:

ScottS said:

Jack Bauer said:

ScottS said:

Oldbear83 said:

Sam Lowry said:

He was carrying a phone to record the officers. The gun was in the back of his belt and was removed by an officer while he was on the ground, before he was shot.

He brought a gun and attacked cops.

A camera does not make that legal, safe, or wise.




The left isn't going to care about minor details like this. They will blame ICE and Trump. They will bring in Jack Smith and prosecute.

Where did he attack the cops?


While conducting the operation, a man approached "U.S. Border Patrol officers with a 9mm semiautomatic handgun."
Officers tried to disarm the man but he "violently resisted."
A photo released by DHS and published by CNN shows the 9mm handgun which was found at the scene where federal agents in Minneapolis shot the armed man.


"Violently resisted"

Is this from Stephen Miller's news feed??


Naw, a statement released by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and read live on FOX News


So basically YES?

Every vido Tape I've seen shows him violently resisting. Not debatable. .
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is what our officers are dealing with in Minneapolis

People literally trying to bite their fingers off…


boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




303Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Jack Bauer said:

ScottS said:

Jack Bauer said:

ScottS said:

Jack Bauer said:

ScottS said:

Oldbear83 said:

Sam Lowry said:

He was carrying a phone to record the officers. The gun was in the back of his belt and was removed by an officer while he was on the ground, before he was shot.

He brought a gun and attacked cops.

A camera does not make that legal, safe, or wise.




The left isn't going to care about minor details like this. They will blame ICE and Trump. They will bring in Jack Smith and prosecute.

Where did he attack the cops?


While conducting the operation, a man approached "U.S. Border Patrol officers with a 9mm semiautomatic handgun."
Officers tried to disarm the man but he "violently resisted."
A photo released by DHS and published by CNN shows the 9mm handgun which was found at the scene where federal agents in Minneapolis shot the armed man.


"Violently resisted"

Is this from Stephen Miller's news feed??


Naw, a statement released by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and read live on FOX News


So basically YES?

Every vido Tape I've seen shows him violently resisting. Not debatable. .


Was he violently resisting when he and the other women were walking away and one is shoved from behind by an ICE agent? Was he violently resisting when he was pepper sprayed after stepping between the other woman just pushed to the ground and the ice agent? Or maybe when he is grabbed from behind on ice and falls on top of the same woman immediately before being mobbed by 4-5 other agents?

I mean he certainly resisted after the first shot, justifying the 5-6 additional in his back as he laid on the ground.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Forest Bueller III said:

Porteroso said:

They had already taken his gun, and were beating him, when one of them pulled a gun and executed him, from what is being reported. If true, it's a big mistake.

I don't want to be called a lib, but I always look for truth, not propaganda. The Trump administration will forward propaganda in this incident. They always do.

Saw the video from the pink ladies point of view and another closer point of view. I don't doubt the dude was carrying he was, but if you watch closely, a guy came up behind him and ripped a gun out of the guys waist/belt and ran away from the brawl moments before the dude was shot.

I can also say this, he did not brandish a weapon or when on the ground getting the hell beat out of him had no way to get to the weapon.

He also was legally carrying which has been reported by multiple Minnesota News agencies.
My son also carries and if he does will have a couple of loaded mags in his belt.

At some point folks on the right might wake up and understand the administration right now ain't right.

The biggest thing I can see here is they again are not allowing locals to investigate the shooting. Real professional need to investigate this, not the administration saying we have this and we will determine the truth.

But, I can see what you are saying about him being disarmed, it appears that one of the officers pulled a gun from him and fled right before the shots were fired.

Also, they say he approached officers with a 9mm. One of the very up close videos showed him directing traffic and then just to his left officers were throwing down a woman the man came up got down and was shielding her from getting beat. They then ripped him off of her, started beating the hell out of him, some other officer ripped something out of his belt and ran away as then about 6-8 rounds were unloaded into him.

Their narrative is bull*****




I would never interfere with law enforcement officers attempting to arrest a perp.

And I would never be stupid enough to commit such a reckless act against said law enforcement officers while carrying a loaded 9mm.

Period
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

If this is the level we are setting to justify this shooting, then we need to ban concealed carry.


Was this a cousin or something?

Why do you care about some mouth-breather who got aired out defending Somali criminals and terrorists?

He gets my nomination for the Darwin Award but the year is still young.....

An American citizen who did not deserve this...


This is the future that "American citizen" was fighting for....

You don't know what, if anything, he was fighting for. All we know is that he was exercising his right to document the events. To condemn him on that basis is un-American.


You dont define what is or isnt American.



You're right. So don't blame the messenger.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

If this is the level we are setting to justify this shooting, then we need to ban concealed carry.


Was this a cousin or something?

Why do you care about some mouth-breather who got aired out defending Somali criminals and terrorists?

He gets my nomination for the Darwin Award but the year is still young.....

An American citizen who did not deserve this...


This is the future that "American citizen" was fighting for....

You don't know what, if anything, he was fighting for. All we know is that he was exercising his right to document the events. To condemn him on that basis is un-American.


You dont define what is or isnt American.



You're right. So don't blame the messenger.


Sam, I recommend you not provoke ICE while they are doing their lawful duty of arresting criminal invaders.

The tolerance level for your domestic terrorism is very low at the moment.
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

Forest Bueller III said:

Porteroso said:

They had already taken his gun, and were beating him, when one of them pulled a gun and executed him, from what is being reported. If true, it's a big mistake.

I don't want to be called a lib, but I always look for truth, not propaganda. The Trump administration will forward propaganda in this incident. They always do.

Saw the video from the pink ladies point of view and another closer point of view. I don't doubt the dude was carrying he was, but if you watch closely, a guy came up behind him and ripped a gun out of the guys waist/belt and ran away from the brawl moments before the dude was shot.

I can also say this, he did not brandish a weapon or when on the ground getting the hell beat out of him had no way to get to the weapon.

He also was legally carrying which has been reported by multiple Minnesota News agencies.
My son also carries and if he does will have a couple of loaded mags in his belt.

At some point folks on the right might wake up and understand the administration right now ain't right.

The biggest thing I can see here is they again are not allowing locals to investigate the shooting. Real professional need to investigate this, not the administration saying we have this and we will determine the truth.

But, I can see what you are saying about him being disarmed, it appears that one of the officers pulled a gun from him and fled right before the shots were fired.

Also, they say he approached officers with a 9mm. One of the very up close videos showed him directing traffic and then just to his left officers were throwing down a woman the man came up got down and was shielding her from getting beat. They then ripped him off of her, started beating the hell out of him, some other officer ripped something out of his belt and ran away as then about 6-8 rounds were unloaded into him.

Their narrative is bull*****




I would never interfere with law enforcement officers attempting to arrest a perp.

And I would never be stupid enough to commit such a reckless act against said law enforcement officers while carrying a loaded 9mm.

Period


Sure, but that doesn't mean you could be shot inappropriately if you did.

Seems like everyone is insane. Feds and state officials. Whatever happened to "there's an investigation and we will release the results of that when it is finished."
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam owns guns.

Let him drive over to Brownsville and roll in the dirt with some ICE officers while carrying and they are attempting to arrest illegals wanted for prior felonies

Maybe we could film the ending and post it on X.

Win / Win


Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

If this is the level we are setting to justify this shooting, then we need to ban concealed carry.


Was this a cousin or something?

Why do you care about some mouth-breather who got aired out defending Somali criminals and terrorists?

He gets my nomination for the Darwin Award but the year is still young.....

An American citizen who did not deserve this...


This is the future that "American citizen" was fighting for....

You don't know what, if anything, he was fighting for. All we know is that he was exercising his right to document the events..


1. We don't know that he was there to just use his right to "document events"

He might have been there to fight or assault officers.

We need an investigation first to establish all the facts

2. We have a Press with Constitutional protections to document events. Citizens may do so as well but let's not act like he was needed to cover legal ICE arrests of illegal aliens.

3. He (or anyone else) can document events. But you cannot get into direct confrontations with legal officers or impede them in their official duties.

We will find out if he was after all the facts come out.

If he was then that is NOT protected behavior for a citizen

1. I didn't say otherwise, but there's no evidence he was fighting anyone.

2. Citizens also have constitutional protections and are also needed.

3. In this case it would be more accurate to say you can't not get into direct confrontation if the officers happen to be in a bad mood.
cms186
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm the English Guy
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

If this is the level we are setting to justify this shooting, then we need to ban concealed carry.


Was this a cousin or something?

Why do you care about some mouth-breather who got aired out defending Somali criminals and terrorists?

He gets my nomination for the Darwin Award but the year is still young.....

An American citizen who did not deserve this...


This is the future that "American citizen" was fighting for....

You don't know what, if anything, he was fighting for. All we know is that he was exercising his right to document the events. To condemn him on that basis is un-American.


You dont define what is or isnt American.



You're right. So don't blame the messenger.


Sam, I recommend you not provoke ICE while they are doing their lawful duty of arresting criminal invaders.

The tolerance level for your domestic terrorism is very low at the moment.

Spoken like a true neocon.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This generic statement to justify ICE actions is dangerous.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



If they were actually responding according to training, Noem shouldn't be impeached. She should just step down based on that admission alone.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

This generic statement to justify ICE actions is dangerous.


The only dangerous ones are the ones supporting domestic terrorists and foreign criminals.

The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

If this is the level we are setting to justify this shooting, then we need to ban concealed carry.


Was this a cousin or something?

Why do you care about some mouth-breather who got aired out defending Somali criminals and terrorists?

He gets my nomination for the Darwin Award but the year is still young.....

An American citizen who did not deserve this...


This is the future that "American citizen" was fighting for....

You don't know what, if anything, he was fighting for. All we know is that he was exercising his right to document the events. To condemn him on that basis is un-American.


You dont define what is or isnt American.



You're right. So don't blame the messenger.


Sam, I recommend you not provoke ICE while they are doing their lawful duty of arresting criminal invaders.

The tolerance level for your domestic terrorism is very low at the moment.

Spoken like a true neocon.


I'm an American First Nationalist.

Supporting ICE is completely in alignment with that.

In fact ICE is one of the very few organizations in our government actually serving the people.
ShooterTX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

Redbrickbear said:

Jack Bauer said:

Forest Bueller III said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

ScottS said:

Oldbear83 said:

Sam Lowry said:

He was carrying a phone to record the officers. The gun was in the back of his belt and was removed by an officer while he was on the ground, before he was shot.

He brought a gun and attacked cops.

A camera does not make that legal, safe, or wise.




The left isn't going to care about minor details like this. They will blame ICE and Trump. They will bring in Jack Smith and prosecute.


The problem with this? The video doesn't support what you're saying.

A video is now on Reddit and shows the grey coated officer clearly pulling the gun off of the back or side of his belt before the shots were fired, he is the only one that was going for the mans gun. The mans hands were both pinned to the ground.

It also shows very clearly he was simply trying to cover the woman who was being assaulted, when he was slammed to the ground, beaten, assaulted, whipped with a cannister, pepper sprayed and then after his gun was ripped out of his belt, summarily executed.

On Reddit is called, "Footage of grey coat officer retrieving the gun."




Very clearly that ICE agent lost his cool with the whistling and women screaming at him and that's why he escalated by pepper spraying and taking the man down...



I guess the Left is getting what they want

Having mobs of activists chase agents around on the streets while they try to do their legal jobs of arresting illegal aliens.

Officers just trying to do their jobs and get home safe.

Activists harassing them, yelling at them, spitting at them, charging at them with cars and using cars to stop hard in front of them.

Escalating and harassing at every moment and in every way possible.

And now they have gotten what they wanted and pushed an officer into making what looks like a bad shooting decision.

Well done liberals…well ****ing done




Don't put this on the left.

Minneapolis is a below average population city that is on no one's radar. This administration has targeted the citizens of this city because it votes blue. I can't think of another president that has intentionally targeted citizens.

Joe Biden targeted and persecuted Catholics and parents who showed up to school board meetings... yet you can't think of another president that has intentionaly targeted citizens??


You should have jus stopped with "I can't think". That would have been much more honest.
ShooterTX
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
303Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

This generic statement to justify ICE actions is dangerous.


Yep. Their justification amounts to, he was there and we didn't like it.

Then one thing led to another and he's dead now, but he was there and we didn't like it, also he had a *gasp* legally carried firearm!!
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

If this is the level we are setting to justify this shooting, then we need to ban concealed carry.


Was this a cousin or something?

Why do you care about some mouth-breather who got aired out defending Somali criminals and terrorists?

He gets my nomination for the Darwin Award but the year is still young.....

An American citizen who did not deserve this...


This is the future that "American citizen" was fighting for....

You don't know what, if anything, he was fighting for. All we know is that he was exercising his right to document the events. To condemn him on that basis is un-American.


You dont define what is or isnt American.



You're right. So don't blame the messenger.


Sam, I recommend you not provoke ICE while they are doing their lawful duty of arresting criminal invaders.

The tolerance level for your domestic terrorism is very low at the moment.

Spoken like a true neocon.


I'm an American First Nationalist.

Supporting ICE is completely in alignment with that.

In fact ICE is one of the very few organizations in our government actually serving the people.

You sound more like an ICE First nationalist. Supporting America should be in alignment with the Constitution.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

If this is the level we are setting to justify this shooting, then we need to ban concealed carry.


Was this a cousin or something?

Why do you care about some mouth-breather who got aired out defending Somali criminals and terrorists?

He gets my nomination for the Darwin Award but the year is still young.....

An American citizen who did not deserve this...


This is the future that "American citizen" was fighting for....

You don't know what, if anything, he was fighting for. All we know is that he was exercising his right to document the events. To condemn him on that basis is un-American.


You dont define what is or isnt American.



You're right. So don't blame the messenger.


Sam, I recommend you not provoke ICE while they are doing their lawful duty of arresting criminal invaders.

The tolerance level for your domestic terrorism is very low at the moment.

Spoken like a true neocon.


I'm an American First Nationalist.

Supporting ICE is completely in alignment with that.

In fact ICE is one of the very few organizations in our government actually serving the people.

You sound more like an ICE First nationalist. Supporting America should be in alignment with the Constitution.


Section 3 Treason

    Clause 1
    MeaningTreason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.
303Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

If this is the level we are setting to justify this shooting, then we need to ban concealed carry.


Was this a cousin or something?

Why do you care about some mouth-breather who got aired out defending Somali criminals and terrorists?

He gets my nomination for the Darwin Award but the year is still young.....

An American citizen who did not deserve this...


This is the future that "American citizen" was fighting for....

You don't know what, if anything, he was fighting for. All we know is that he was exercising his right to document the events. To condemn him on that basis is un-American.


You dont define what is or isnt American.



You're right. So don't blame the messenger.


Sam, I recommend you not provoke ICE while they are doing their lawful duty of arresting criminal invaders.

The tolerance level for your domestic terrorism is very low at the moment.

Spoken like a true neocon.


I'm an American First Nationalist.

Supporting ICE is completely in alignment with that.

In fact ICE is one of the very few organizations in our government actually serving the people.

You sound more like an ICE First nationalist. Supporting America should be in alignment with the Constitution.


2381. Treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

Are you equating standing in a street with a camera in your hand and (possibly, I cannot tell who is saying what from any of the videos) yelling at federal agents to treason punishable by death (which it only is after a trial, you know, that cool due process thing)?

If that is what you are saying then... I guess that is a thing you said.
Robert Wilson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
303Bear said:

The_barBEARian said:

Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

If this is the level we are setting to justify this shooting, then we need to ban concealed carry.


Was this a cousin or something?

Why do you care about some mouth-breather who got aired out defending Somali criminals and terrorists?

He gets my nomination for the Darwin Award but the year is still young.....

An American citizen who did not deserve this...


This is the future that "American citizen" was fighting for....

You don't know what, if anything, he was fighting for. All we know is that he was exercising his right to document the events. To condemn him on that basis is un-American.


You dont define what is or isnt American.



You're right. So don't blame the messenger.


Sam, I recommend you not provoke ICE while they are doing their lawful duty of arresting criminal invaders.

The tolerance level for your domestic terrorism is very low at the moment.

Spoken like a true neocon.


I'm an American First Nationalist.

Supporting ICE is completely in alignment with that.

In fact ICE is one of the very few organizations in our government actually serving the people.

You sound more like an ICE First nationalist. Supporting America should be in alignment with the Constitution.


2381. Treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

Are you equating standing in a street with a camera in your hand and (possibly, I cannot tell who is saying what from any of the videos) yelling at federal agents to treason punishable by death (which it only is after a trial, you know, that cool due process thing)?

If that is what you are saying then... I guess that is a thing you said.


Hold his beer

You ain't seen nothing yet
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
303Bear said:

The_barBEARian said:

Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Sam Lowry said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

The_barBEARian said:

Jack Bauer said:

If this is the level we are setting to justify this shooting, then we need to ban concealed carry.


Was this a cousin or something?

Why do you care about some mouth-breather who got aired out defending Somali criminals and terrorists?

He gets my nomination for the Darwin Award but the year is still young.....

An American citizen who did not deserve this...


This is the future that "American citizen" was fighting for....

You don't know what, if anything, he was fighting for. All we know is that he was exercising his right to document the events. To condemn him on that basis is un-American.


You dont define what is or isnt American.



You're right. So don't blame the messenger.


Sam, I recommend you not provoke ICE while they are doing their lawful duty of arresting criminal invaders.

The tolerance level for your domestic terrorism is very low at the moment.

Spoken like a true neocon.


I'm an American First Nationalist.

Supporting ICE is completely in alignment with that.

In fact ICE is one of the very few organizations in our government actually serving the people.

You sound more like an ICE First nationalist. Supporting America should be in alignment with the Constitution.


2381. Treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

Are you equating standing in a street with a camera in your hand and (possibly, I cannot tell who is saying what from any of the videos) yelling at federal agents to treason punishable by death (which it only is after a trial, you know, that cool due process thing)?

If that is what you are saying then... I guess that is a thing you said.


He did more than yell.

He was obstructing.


 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.