Whilst sitting next to Putin. What an idiot. You can't make this stuff up. He is ill prepared to be President.
Not anyone but myself.fadskier said:
Ok cinque. We've been clued in that this is a copy account of you. This one is now on ignore as well.
That's alway a great to respond to an issue you don't agree with.. Take your toys and go home. Guess you are not up to the task, but like to belittle and call names. Happy to on your ignore list as I don't have to have discourse with a coward.fadskier said:
Got a PM from someone....but I was joking. He's on ignore anyway.
It's how Trumpies convince themselves to ignore any valid criticisms of Trump. Anything negative about Trump is just fake news generated by Soros' social media bots, which in their eyes cinque must surely be...or something.Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
you think jr is cinque?
crazy
I think there are definitely valid criticisms of Trump. However, the problem is that it is a "cry wolf" syndrome where they complain about everything. I think if it were limited to actual complaints as opposed to whining, then more people would be opening to listening. The misquoting, screaming at everything he says, it just gets old and I for one, just begin to ignore them. Just like I did after I voted for Obama the first time, I just had to tune people out.HuMcK said:It's how Trumpies convince themselves to ignore any valid criticisms of Trump. Anything negative about Trump is just fake news generated by Soros' social media bots, which in their eyes cinque must surely be...or something.Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
you think jr is cinque?
crazy
corncob pipe said:
Remember when our intelligence service claimed that there were WMP's in Iraq
Spot on they were
Trump didn't blame America for Russian election meddling, nor did he throw anyone under the bus. He said the bad relationship between the two countries was a result of foolishness on both sides. He answered the question about American intelligence in the only diplomatic way he could.J.R. said:
I want to someone to defend our President throwing our security apparatus under the bus on the worlds stage. That this flat out unacceptable and the Republican Congress has to rebuke him.
Anything other than a giving a sloppy blowjob to Putin on stage would have been preferable. What y'all don't seem to understand is that the cyber-war has already started, and our President for whatever reason seems unwilling to even acknowledge what happened or do anything at all to strike back. Honestly the way Republicans are acting these days, they seem scared of Putin and what he could do (or already has done) to them.Jack and DP said:
I guess some prefer Trump declared war on Russia.
What has he done? Facebook ads? Twitter bots?HuMcK said:Anything other than a giving a sloppy blowjob to Putin on stage would have been preferable. What y'all don't seem to understand is that the cyber-war has already started, and our President for whatever reason seems unwilling to even acknowledge what happened or do anything at all to strike back. Honestly the way Republicans are acting these days, they seem scared of Putin and what he could do (or already has done) to them.Jack and DP said:
I guess some prefer Trump declared war on Russia.
HuMcK said:Anything other than a giving a sloppy blowjob to Putin on stage would have been preferable. What y'all don't seem to understand is that the cyber-war has already started, and our President for whatever reason seems unwilling to even acknowledge what happened or do anything at all to strike back. Honestly the way Republicans are acting these days, they seem scared of Putin and what he could do (or already has done) to them.Jack and DP said:
I guess some prefer Trump declared war on Russia.
How many ways does illegally hacking a political campaign and disseminating the stolen goods as an info-op need to be explained to you before you understand? At this point I am forced to think the only reason you don't get it is because you don't want to. And yes, the social media astroturfing is a component of what they did/are doing.fadskier said:What has he done? Facebook ads? Twitter bots?HuMcK said:Anything other than a giving a sloppy blowjob to Putin on stage would have been preferable. What y'all don't seem to understand is that the cyber-war has already started, and our President for whatever reason seems unwilling to even acknowledge what happened or do anything at all to strike back. Honestly the way Republicans are acting these days, they seem scared of Putin and what he could do (or already has done) to them.Jack and DP said:
I guess some prefer Trump declared war on Russia.
So far, we know that the DNC servers were hacked. Emails that demonized the DNC were released. Thank you Russia for shedding light on how the Dems rigged their own side of the election. Are you mad at Dems for doing this or just at "Russia" for opening it up?HuMcK said:How many ways does illegally hacking a political campaign and disseminating the stolen goods as an info-op need to be explained to you before you understand? And yes, the social media astroturfing is a component of what they did/are doing.fadskier said:What has he done? Facebook ads? Twitter bots?HuMcK said:Anything other than a giving a sloppy blowjob to Putin on stage would have been preferable. What y'all don't seem to understand is that the cyber-war has already started, and our President for whatever reason seems unwilling to even acknowledge what happened or do anything at all to strike back. Honestly the way Republicans are acting these days, they seem scared of Putin and what he could do (or already has done) to them.Jack and DP said:
I guess some prefer Trump declared war on Russia.
Buck Whiskey said:
It was the gay sex. Ball gags and whippets to release the sphincter. Whippets make the butt sex easier. Tommie while confirm.
That's how stupid this site has become.
Sam Lowry said:Trump didn't blame America for Russian election meddling, nor did he throw anyone under the bus. He said the bad relationship between the two countries was a result of foolishness on both sides. He answered the question about American intelligence in the only diplomatic way he could.J.R. said:
I want to someone to defend our President throwing our security apparatus under the bus on the worlds stage. That this flat out unacceptable and the Republican Congress has to rebuke him.
That is diplomatic?Quote:
So let me just say we have two thoughts. We have groups that are wondering why the FBI never took the server. Why haven't they taken the server? Why was the FBI told to leave the office of the Democratic National Committee? I've been wondering that. I've been asking that for months and months and tweeting it out and calling it out on social media. Where is the server? I want to know, where is the server, and what is the server saying? With that being said, all I can do is ask the question, my people came to me, [director of national intelligence] Dan Coats came to me, and some others, they said, they think it's Russia. I have President Putin. He just said it's not Russia. I will say this. I don't see any reason why it would be, but I really do want to see the server, but I haveI have confidence in both parties. I really believe that this will probably go on for a while, but I don't think it can go on without finding out what happened to the server. What happened to the servers of the Pakistani gentleman that worked on the DNC. Where are those servers? They're missing. Where are they? What happened to Hillary Clinton's e-mails? 33,000 e-mails gone, just gone. I think in Russia they wouldn't be gone so easily. I think it's a disgrace we can't get Hillary Clinton's 33,000 e-mails. So I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today. And what he did, is an incredible offer. He offered to have the people working on the case come and work with their investigators, with respect to the 12 people. I think that's an incredible offer. Okay? Thank you.
Ha, I was waiting for a comment like that. I mean it was diplomatic for Trump. My point is that you wouldn't normally expect a president to stand there and say what he really believes. His people say one thing, Putin says another, and I think that was the right answer under the circumstances.BearinSoDak said:Sam Lowry said:Trump didn't blame America for Russian election meddling, nor did he throw anyone under the bus. He said the bad relationship between the two countries was a result of foolishness on both sides. He answered the question about American intelligence in the only diplomatic way he could.J.R. said:
I want to someone to defend our President throwing our security apparatus under the bus on the worlds stage. That this flat out unacceptable and the Republican Congress has to rebuke him.That is diplomatic?Quote:
So let me just say we have two thoughts. We have groups that are wondering why the FBI never took the server. Why haven't they taken the server? Why was the FBI told to leave the office of the Democratic National Committee? I've been wondering that. I've been asking that for months and months and tweeting it out and calling it out on social media. Where is the server? I want to know, where is the server, and what is the server saying? With that being said, all I can do is ask the question, my people came to me, [director of national intelligence] Dan Coats came to me, and some others, they said, they think it's Russia. I have President Putin. He just said it's not Russia. I will say this. I don't see any reason why it would be, but I really do want to see the server, but I haveI have confidence in both parties. I really believe that this will probably go on for a while, but I don't think it can go on without finding out what happened to the server. What happened to the servers of the Pakistani gentleman that worked on the DNC. Where are those servers? They're missing. Where are they? What happened to Hillary Clinton's e-mails? 33,000 e-mails gone, just gone. I think in Russia they wouldn't be gone so easily. I think it's a disgrace we can't get Hillary Clinton's 33,000 e-mails. So I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today. And what he did, is an incredible offer. He offered to have the people working on the case come and work with their investigators, with respect to the 12 people. I think that's an incredible offer. Okay? Thank you.
Completely agree here. Deep State. Alan Dershowitz has been dead right on this one - Trump is the poor, innocent victim of a massive government conspiracy..... Just like Dershowitz uncovered the massive effort of the LA PD to frame an obviously innocent OJ. Poor Trump and OJ - two victims.... LOLfadskier said:
I'm not excusing what Trump said, but after all the corruption that we've learned about in the federal government, I wouldn't be surprised by anything anymore.
It's an even trickier situation. Do you expect Trump to criticize his patron? Not good form, or wise business. Trump's not (that) stupid!Sam Lowry said:Ha, I was waiting for a comment like that. I mean it was diplomatic for Trump. My point is that you wouldn't normally expect a president to stand there and say what he really believes. His people say one thing, Putin says another, and I think that was the right answer under the circumstances.BearinSoDak said:Sam Lowry said:Trump didn't blame America for Russian election meddling, nor did he throw anyone under the bus. He said the bad relationship between the two countries was a result of foolishness on both sides. He answered the question about American intelligence in the only diplomatic way he could.J.R. said:
I want to someone to defend our President throwing our security apparatus under the bus on the worlds stage. That this flat out unacceptable and the Republican Congress has to rebuke him.That is diplomatic?Quote:
So let me just say we have two thoughts. We have groups that are wondering why the FBI never took the server. Why haven't they taken the server? Why was the FBI told to leave the office of the Democratic National Committee? I've been wondering that. I've been asking that for months and months and tweeting it out and calling it out on social media. Where is the server? I want to know, where is the server, and what is the server saying? With that being said, all I can do is ask the question, my people came to me, [director of national intelligence] Dan Coats came to me, and some others, they said, they think it's Russia. I have President Putin. He just said it's not Russia. I will say this. I don't see any reason why it would be, but I really do want to see the server, but I haveI have confidence in both parties. I really believe that this will probably go on for a while, but I don't think it can go on without finding out what happened to the server. What happened to the servers of the Pakistani gentleman that worked on the DNC. Where are those servers? They're missing. Where are they? What happened to Hillary Clinton's e-mails? 33,000 e-mails gone, just gone. I think in Russia they wouldn't be gone so easily. I think it's a disgrace we can't get Hillary Clinton's 33,000 e-mails. So I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today. And what he did, is an incredible offer. He offered to have the people working on the case come and work with their investigators, with respect to the 12 people. I think that's an incredible offer. Okay? Thank you.
What exactly did he say?J.R. said:
Whilst sitting next to Putin. What an idiot. You can't make this stuff up. He is ill prepared to be President.