quash said:
MilliVanilli said:
quash said:
MilliVanilli said:
quash said:
Again, words have meaning and we have separate words for abortion and infanticide. But you're more interested in ideological posturing than in helping solve the problem.
You use semantic to feel good about infanticide, we get it, you're a hack that tries to silence whatever conscience you have left by asininely parsing words in hopes that will deflect from reality.
If it makes you feel better you can believe that. Won't make it true.
But seriously, why so averse to engaging in dialogue that seeks a solution?
You're the hack that came on a thread civilly discussing the tradition you willfully ignore and betray with partisan stupidity and now want to play a victim for being exposed as intellectually dishonest.
If there is nothing ethically wrong with abortion then there's no need to compromise, period.
You didn't come here to be a solution seeker, that's a pivot from showing your ass, and you're too clueless to realize your indefensible position exposes itself by asking for a solution, because if your position were true then there would be nothing to talk about, but you know better despite your posturing.
You're comfortable with an immoral position, it just irks you that reality has to be bent to keep you insulated with that choice.
I tried several times to move the discussion forward. You can't see anything but your side, and that is why many Americans oppose your position. Try common ground instead of hate for the post-born.
No, out the gate you behaved like an unprovoked jackass and destroyed credibility for trying to dialogue, you made it quite clear you weren't here for that.
Then you thought we were all dumb enough to fall for semantic dumbassery, and then you backpedaled to the point of revealing you KNOW abortion is immoral or else you wouldn't suddenly shrink from bravado, to semantics, to pretending you're some peacemaker looking for compromise.
Americans don't oppose my position, most are appalled at abortion being used as birth control. Wendy Davis was rejected in the worst landslide since 1998 accordingly for trying to filibuster a bill that 66 percent of the public backed, and that still made Texas abortion laws more liberal than every nation on Earth outside of Canada and the UK.
When you lot are so frothing at the mouth that you won't even agree not to kill children after they are scientifically proven to feel pain in the womb, you show how barbaric and threatened you feel by having to consider the ramifications of abortion at all.
In France you can't get an abortion past 10 weeks, in Spain and Germany 12, much of Western Europe follows suit with that, none permitting more than 20 weeks because of the fact the child can without a shadow of a doubt feel pain as it's being burned to death or suctioned apart.
But you bloodthirsty libertines on this side of the Atlantic think semantics can disqualify scientific reality, one our much more secular members of Western civilization acknowledge and abide by, but for some reason modern "liberalism" can't even coincide with supposedly more "liberal" societies than our own on the issue, much less the tenants of liberalism's own historical pro-life position.
