Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

I didnt insinuate anything. I said non Baylor people should be respectful on a Baylor board.

Again can you name 4 or were you just making stuff up?

Btw deceitful means lying or not being honest. I thought my post was straightforward.

You made the statement half of the posters here are not Baylor. I asked if you could mane four. You chose not to answer. Why?

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

Wow. You call names and then accuse me of labeling. Firing the sunset gun a little early aren't we?

Real Baylor people graduated from Baylor. This is a Baylor forum. Surprised I had to explain that to you.

Brooks is bigger stronger younger and smarter than you. I dont think you would call him names to his face. Internet name callers dont usually show up anyway.

---

Again what does it matter if someone graduated from Baylor or wherever?

YES. ON A BAYLOR BOARD YOU SHOULD SHOW A LITTLE RESPECT FOR BAYLOR ALUMNI, YOU ARE A VISITOR

Can we not criticize and question a professional student like BBL that happened to choose Baylor instead of somewhere else?

YOU CAN CRITICIZE WITHOUT STUPID LITTLE NAME CALLING. HE IS A BAYLOR GRAD ON A BAYLOR BOARD. THERE ARE PLENTY OF NON COLLEGE SPECIFIC BOARDS.```````````````````````

Are you insinuating those that didn't graduate from Baylor shouldn't be here? That's probably half this poli board at least truth be known btw

i DIDNT INSINUATE ANYTHING. i MADE IT PERFECTLY CLEAR.


Now name 4 or admit yur are full of shlt and a liar.

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Brooks, you're unhinged. Like completely unhinged brother.

We know POTUS lives rent free in your head, but he isn't a king or dictator, and he will be out of office in 6 years.

Nothing bad or crazy is happening, we're not in a major war, the economy is on fire, people are happy and their buying power is tremendous.

There is simply the rise of populism because your political views have been at the forefront for the past 20 years. It's time to respect that not everyone thinks like you. OK. Coexist.

Calm down.

---

You only said one wrong thing. The economy is not on fire for BBL because he's probably either a government worker on on entitlements. Those are under attack with Trump. Hence BBLs Trump paranoia due to fear

---

His problem is he's slowly realizing that outrage doesn't work anymore and he's really got nothing else to advance his failing political agenda.

Plus the left has to walk on eggshells not to offend anyone or we'll call their asses out for being the hypocrites they are. This puts them at a major disadvantage for saying what they truly want to say.

---

Don't quote FlordaMike. The guy can't spell Florida. He's an old racist that follows me around and I think he wants to make out with me.

Sorry, buddy. Wrong kind of Liberal.

---

See what I mean

BBL is clueless as he doesn't know why I "misspell" Florida even though I've explained it numerous times here

LMAO on BBL

I'm beginning to think he's a prissy feminine gay but won't admit it unfortunately out of shame. Why feel guilty as his Democrat Party supposedly defends "LGBTQ" or whatever it is

---

BBL's been making an effort to be civil, Florda. Cut him some slack, 'K?

---

So how do ya feel about this BBL character now?

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

Half? I can only name three, but one of them actually attended Baylor for a few years. Half would be around 200 regular posters. Can you name 4 or are you just full of crap?

I labeled Brooks as a Baylor man. I am sure he is ok with that. You called him names.

And yes, this is a Baylor board. I wouldnt go on a Tech or Aggie board and be disrespctful to alumns. I would get banned pretty quickly. Instead Sicem tries to be tolerant and look what we get.

---

Funny how you pick and choose what question you answer and actually answered nothing

Very clever .... or deceitful?

Baylor man? Ha

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Brooks, you're unhinged. Like completely unhinged brother.

We know POTUS lives rent free in your head, but he isn't a king or dictator, and he will be out of office in 6 years.

Nothing bad or crazy is happening, we're not in a major war, the economy is on fire, people are happy and their buying power is tremendous.

There is simply the rise of populism because your political views have been at the forefront for the past 20 years. It's time to respect that not everyone thinks like you. OK. Coexist.

Calm down.

---

You only said one wrong thing. The economy is not on fire for BBL because he's probably either a government worker on on entitlements. Those are under attack with Trump. Hence BBLs Trump paranoia due to fear

---

His problem is he's slowly realizing that outrage doesn't work anymore and he's really got nothing else to advance his failing political agenda.

Plus the left has to walk on eggshells not to offend anyone or we'll call their asses out for being the hypocrites they are. This puts them at a major disadvantage for saying what they truly want to say.

---

Don't quote FlordaMike. The guy can't spell Florida. He's an old racist that follows me around and I think he wants to make out with me.

Sorry, buddy. Wrong kind of Liberal.

---

See what I mean

BBL is clueless as he doesn't know why I "misspell" Florida even though I've explained it numerous times here

LMAO on BBL

I'm beginning to think he's a prissy feminine gay but won't admit it unfortunately out of shame. Why feel guilty as his Democrat Party supposedly defends "LGBTQ" or whatever it is

---

BBL's been making an effort to be civil, Florda. Cut him some slack, 'K?

---

So how do ya feel about this BBL character now?

---

I feel sorry for him. He gets easily upset and doesn't even notice the difference between legit opinion and harassment.

Kind of like Golem but on the Left.

---

Florda_mike said:

---

No way to check for actual Baylor "graduates" here and you liars know it too

And LIQ, you did NOT answer my questions directly, you never answer anyone's questions directly. You dodge cleverly though

You're not much different from democrats that never even address questions asked of them

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

No way to check for actual Baylor "graduates" here and you liars know it too

And LIQ, you did NOT answer my questions directly, you never answer anyone's questions directly. You dodge cleverly though

You're not much different from democrats that never even address questions asked of them

---

You made the claim.

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Are you insinuating those that didn't graduate from Baylor shouldn't be here? That's probably half this poli board at least truth be known btw

---

robby44 said:

---

The actual document is embedded in the article

---

quash said:

---

robby44 said:

---

The actual document is embedded in the article

---

For people who aren't afraid of forming their own opinion.

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

robby44 said:

---

The actual document is embedded in the article

---

For people who aren't afraid of forming their own opinion.

---

I read the document. The claims you made were the claims by Slate, not either the US nor the Mexican government.

Quash be Democrat, so that's no surprise.

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

robby44 said:

---

The actual document is embedded in the article

---

For people who aren't afraid of forming their own opinion.

---

I read the document. The claims you made were the claims by Slate, not either the US nor the Mexican government.

Quash be Democrat, so that's no surprise.

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

robby44 said:

---

The actual document is embedded in the article

---

For people who aren't afraid of forming their own opinion.

---

I read the document. The claims you made were the claims by Slate, not either the US nor the Mexican government.

Quash be Democrat, so that's no surprise.

---

What claims did Mexico make beyond agreeing to more talks?

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

robby44 said:

---

The actual document is embedded in the article

---

For people who aren't afraid of forming their own opinion.

---

I read the document. The claims you made were the claims by Slate, not either the US nor the Mexican government.

Quash be Democrat, so that's no surprise.

---

What claims did Mexico make beyond agreeing to more talks?

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

robby44 said:

---

The actual document is embedded in the article

---

For people who aren't afraid of forming their own opinion.

---

I read the document. The claims you made were the claims by Slate, not either the US nor the Mexican government.

Quash be Democrat, so that's no surprise.

---

What claims did Mexico make beyond agreeing to more talks?

---

Your turn, quash - read the actual document. It's not what Slate implies.

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

robby44 said:

---

The actual document is embedded in the article

---

For people who aren't afraid of forming their own opinion.

---

I read the document. The claims you made were the claims by Slate, not either the US nor the Mexican government.

Quash be Democrat, so that's no surprise.

---

What claims did Mexico make beyond agreeing to more talks?

---

Your turn, quash - read the actual document. It's not what Slate implies.

---

Read it. They agreed to more talks. You claimed otherwise but have so far provided nothing else from the agreement. Try.

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

robby44 said:

---

The actual document is embedded in the article

---

For people who aren't afraid of forming their own opinion.

---

I read the document. The claims you made were the claims by Slate, not either the US nor the Mexican government.

Quash be Democrat, so that's no surprise.

---

What claims did Mexico make beyond agreeing to more talks?

---

Your turn, quash - read the actual document. It's not what Slate implies.

---

Read it. They agreed to more talks. You claimed otherwise but have so far provided nothing else from the agreement. Try.

---

Wrongo.

Reading comprehension is a problem for quash. Kind of like his political orientation.

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

robby44 said:

---

The actual document is embedded in the article

---

For people who aren't afraid of forming their own opinion.

---

I read the document. The claims you made were the claims by Slate, not either the US nor the Mexican government.

Quash be Democrat, so that's no surprise.

---

What claims did Mexico make beyond agreeing to more talks?

---

Your turn, quash - read the actual document. It's not what Slate implies.

---

Read it. They agreed to more talks. You claimed otherwise but have so far provided nothing else from the agreement. Try.

---

Wrongo.

Reading comprehension is a problem for quash. Kind of like his political orientation.

---

You claimed there is more than an agreement for more talks. What part of the article are you referring to?

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

robby44 said:

---

The actual document is embedded in the article

---

For people who aren't afraid of forming their own opinion.

---

I read the document. The claims you made were the claims by Slate, not either the US nor the Mexican government.

Quash be Democrat, so that's no surprise.

---

What claims did Mexico make beyond agreeing to more talks?

---

Your turn, quash - read the actual document. It's not what Slate implies.

---

Read it. They agreed to more talks. You claimed otherwise but have so far provided nothing else from the agreement. Try.

---

Wrongo.

Reading comprehension is a problem for quash. Kind of like his political orientation.

---

You claimed there is more than an agreement for more talks. What part of the article are you referring to?

---

The agreement text specifies troop commitments, for one thing.

Kind of a big deal, that.

---

RebelT said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

robby44 said:

---

The actual document is embedded in the article

---

For people who aren't afraid of forming their own opinion.

---

I read the document. The claims you made were the claims by Slate, not either the US nor the Mexican government.

Quash be Democrat, so that's no surprise.

---

What claims did Mexico make beyond agreeing to more talks?

---

Your turn, quash - read the actual document. It's not what Slate implies.

---

Read it. They agreed to more talks. You claimed otherwise but have so far provided nothing else from the agreement. Try.

---

Wrongo.

Reading comprehension is a problem for quash. Kind of like his political orientation.

---

You claimed there is more than an agreement for more talks. What part of the article are you referring to?

---

The agreement text specifies troop commitments, for one thing.

Kind of a big deal, that.

---

Why are you a lying piece of *****

The letter says absolutely nothing of the kind.

---

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

Hey mikey. You said half of posters were not Baylor people. I asked for 4. You couldn't do it.

Stop calling other people liars.

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

robby44 said:

---

The actual document is embedded in the article

---

For people who aren't afraid of forming their own opinion.

---

I read the document. The claims you made were the claims by Slate, not either the US nor the Mexican government.

Quash be Democrat, so that's no surprise.

---

What claims did Mexico make beyond agreeing to more talks?

---

Your turn, quash - read the actual document. It's not what Slate implies.

---

Read it. They agreed to more talks. You claimed otherwise but have so far provided nothing else from the agreement. Try.

---

Wrongo.

Reading comprehension is a problem for quash. Kind of like his political orientation.

---

You claimed there is more than an agreement for more talks. What part of the article are you referring to?

---

The agreement text specifies troop commitments, for one thing.

Kind of a big deal, that.

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Sorry quash, you are correct that the document you say is the whole agreement does not specify troop commitments.

I was paying attention to actual events

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/mexico-is-sending-6-000-troops-to-secure-its-border-ahead-of-trumps-tariff-deadline

and real military intervention by Mexico



which occurred just at the time Trump said there was an agreement to do so.

So it seems there is more than you have on that one document.

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Sorry quash, you are correct that the document you say is the whole agreement does not specify troop commitments.

I was paying attention to actual events

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/mexico-is-sending-6-000-troops-to-secure-its-border-ahead-of-trumps-tariff-deadline

and real military intervention by Mexico



which occurred just at the time Trump said there was an agreement to do so.

So it seems there is more than you have on that one document.

---

It's not what I have, it's what Trump claimed he had.

Thanks for acknowledging that Slate got it right in their reporting on the secret agreement.

---