Florda_mike said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

whitetrash said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

riflebear said:

---

---

Cut taxes taxes and flood the market with easy credit. Anyone can do that. Bush did it, Teagan did it. Then it crashes. Dems clean it up. **

---

**Longs for the days of Carter with 21% interest rates and 15% inflation.

---

What executive acts lead to those numbers?

---

The weed seems to have limited quash's brain. Presidents do more than Executive Orders, although some of Trump's success comes from simply reversing Obama's EO's.

---

If EO meant EO I would have said EO. So I left open a president's every act. Naturally you have no substantive reply, merely a pair of lies.

Sad!

---

You are so going to hate Trump's re-election, quash.

---

^^^ If the cheatin' Democrats don't succeed in stealing the election. Don't forget they will have had 4 years to work their vote fraud in the ones that were close for Shillary

---

Yeah, about that Trump commission to look into those 3 million fraudulent votes...

---

You know that's the truth too!

Didn't you say you rent and don't even own a home?

There's been proposals that those that don't own property nor pay taxes shouldn't be allowed to vote because you don't contribute, financially, to our great country. That would be a great start for Trump as then Republicans would rule forever and our country would be saved from bum Socialists like you

This country doesn't need the likes of you and those like you

---

I sold my home years ago.

Your version of who should be able to vote is well suited to a small dictatorship. It is also fundamentally unAmerican in this century.

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

whitetrash said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

riflebear said:

---

---

Cut taxes taxes and flood the market with easy credit. Anyone can do that. Bush did it, Teagan did it. Then it crashes. Dems clean it up. **

---

**Longs for the days of Carter with 21% interest rates and 15% inflation.

---

What executive acts lead to those numbers?

---

The weed seems to have limited quash's brain. Presidents do more than Executive Orders, although some of Trump's success comes from simply reversing Obama's EO's.

---

If EO meant EO I would have said EO. So I left open a president's every act. Naturally you have no substantive reply, merely a pair of lies.

Sad!

---

You are so going to hate Trump's re-election, quash.

---

^^^ If the cheatin' Democrats don't succeed in stealing the election. Don't forget they will have had 4 years to work their vote fraud in the ones that were close for Shillary

---

Yeah, about that Trump commission to look into those 3 million fraudulent votes...

---

You know that's the truth too!

Didn't you say you rent and don't even own a home?

There's been proposals that those that don't own property nor pay taxes shouldn't be allowed to vote because you don't contribute, financially, to our great country. That would be a great start for Trump as then Republicans would rule forever and our country would be saved from bum Socialists like you

This country doesn't need the likes of you and those like you

---

I sold my home years ago.

Your version of who should be able to vote is well suited to a small dictatorship. It is also fundamentally unAmerican in this century.

---

Only those that pay income tax should vote for our employees

People shouldn't be able to vote for how much their entitlement check will be.

What's wrong with that?

Florda_mike said:

---

Dems clean it up?

Does this justify my calling Waco an idiot?

---

Nope. Look in a mirror for that answer.
Obama triple the market.
Pumps money into the economy via spending
Cuts unemployment from 10% to 4%.
I call that cleaning up
Warren or Harris or Bernie or Biden or Klobacher, or Gillibrand will have to clean up after dt and his stupid tax cuts, increased health cost and trade stupidity

Florda_mike said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

whitetrash said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

riflebear said:

---

---

Cut taxes taxes and flood the market with easy credit. Anyone can do that. Bush did it, Teagan did it. Then it crashes. Dems clean it up. **

---

**Longs for the days of Carter with 21% interest rates and 15% inflation.

---

What executive acts lead to those numbers?

---

The weed seems to have limited quash's brain. Presidents do more than Executive Orders, although some of Trump's success comes from simply reversing Obama's EO's.

---

If EO meant EO I would have said EO. So I left open a president's every act. Naturally you have no substantive reply, merely a pair of lies.

Sad!

---

You are so going to hate Trump's re-election, quash.

---

^^^ If the cheatin' Democrats don't succeed in stealing the election. Don't forget they will have had 4 years to work their vote fraud in the ones that were close for Shillary

---

Yeah, about that Trump commission to look into those 3 million fraudulent votes...

---

You know that's the truth too!

Didn't you say you rent and don't even own a home?

There's been proposals that those that don't own property nor pay taxes shouldn't be allowed to vote because you don't contribute, financially, to our great country. That would be a great start for Trump as then Republicans would rule forever and our country would be saved from bum Socialists like you

This country doesn't need the likes of you and those like you

---

I sold my home years ago.

Your version of who should be able to vote is well suited to a small dictatorship. It is also fundamentally unAmerican in this century.

---

Only those that pay income tax should vote for our employees

People shouldn't be able to vote for how much their entitlement check will be.

What's wrong with that?

---

Glad to see you've dropped the property ownership requirement. Paying taxes to vote is unconstitutional.

Does POTUS pay taxes? Would you take away his right to vote?

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

whitetrash said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

riflebear said:

---

---

Cut taxes taxes and flood the market with easy credit. Anyone can do that. Bush did it, Teagan did it. Then it crashes. Dems clean it up. **

---

**Longs for the days of Carter with 21% interest rates and 15% inflation.

---

What executive acts lead to those numbers?

---

The weed seems to have limited quash's brain. Presidents do more than Executive Orders, although some of Trump's success comes from simply reversing Obama's EO's.

---

If EO meant EO I would have said EO. So I left open a president's every act. Naturally you have no substantive reply, merely a pair of lies.

Sad!

---

You are so going to hate Trump's re-election, quash.

---

^^^ If the cheatin' Democrats don't succeed in stealing the election. Don't forget they will have had 4 years to work their vote fraud in the ones that were close for Shillary

---

Yeah, about that Trump commission to look into those 3 million fraudulent votes...

---

You know that's the truth too!

Didn't you say you rent and don't even own a home?

There's been proposals that those that don't own property nor pay taxes shouldn't be allowed to vote because you don't contribute, financially, to our great country. That would be a great start for Trump as then Republicans would rule forever and our country would be saved from bum Socialists like you

This country doesn't need the likes of you and those like you

---

I sold my home years ago.

Your version of who should be able to vote is well suited to a small dictatorship. It is also fundamentally unAmerican in this century.

---

Only those that pay income tax should vote for our employees

People shouldn't be able to vote for how much their entitlement check will be.

What's wrong with that?

---

Glad to see you've dropped the property ownership requirement. Paying taxes to vote is unconstitutional.

Does POTUS pay taxes? Would you take away his right to vote?

---

I'd go for a constitutional competency test for the voter and the candidate tho.

Literacy test called "We tried that. It was struck down. We thought every knew
1. how long is a piece of string?
2. How many bubbles in a bar of soap?"

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

whitetrash said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

riflebear said:

---

---

Cut taxes taxes and flood the market with easy credit. Anyone can do that. Bush did it, Teagan did it. Then it crashes. Dems clean it up. **

---

**Longs for the days of Carter with 21% interest rates and 15% inflation.

---

What executive acts lead to those numbers?

---

The weed seems to have limited quash's brain. Presidents do more than Executive Orders, although some of Trump's success comes from simply reversing Obama's EO's.

---

Quash makes a good point and you respond with ad hominem attacks alleging drug use.

I'd say you're better than this but... well...

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

whitetrash said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

riflebear said:

---

---

Cut taxes taxes and flood the market with easy credit. Anyone can do that. Bush did it, Teagan did it. Then it crashes. Dems clean it up. **

---

**Longs for the days of Carter with 21% interest rates and 15% inflation.

---

What executive acts lead to those numbers?

---

The weed seems to have limited quash's brain. Presidents do more than Executive Orders, although some of Trump's success comes from simply reversing Obama's EO's.

---

Quash makes a good point and you respond with ad hominem attacks alleging drug use.

I'd say you're better than this but... well...

---

Check your post history, BBL. The maxim about glass houses and stones should come to mind ...

Waco1947 said:

---

Literacy test called "We tried that. It was struck down. We thought every knew
1. how long is a piece of string?
2. How many bubbles in a bar of soap?"

---

I didn't state literacy...I stated competency. Maybe you need a literacy test.

YoakDaddy said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

whitetrash said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

riflebear said:

---

---

Cut taxes taxes and flood the market with easy credit. Anyone can do that. Bush did it, Teagan did it. Then it crashes. Dems clean it up. **

---

**Longs for the days of Carter with 21% interest rates and 15% inflation.

---

What executive acts lead to those numbers?

---

The weed seems to have limited quash's brain. Presidents do more than Executive Orders, although some of Trump's success comes from simply reversing Obama's EO's.

---

If EO meant EO I would have said EO. So I left open a president's every act. Naturally you have no substantive reply, merely a pair of lies.

Sad!

---

You are so going to hate Trump's re-election, quash.

---

^^^ If the cheatin' Democrats don't succeed in stealing the election. Don't forget they will have had 4 years to work their vote fraud in the ones that were close for Shillary

---

Yeah, about that Trump commission to look into those 3 million fraudulent votes...

---

You know that's the truth too!

Didn't you say you rent and don't even own a home?

There's been proposals that those that don't own property nor pay taxes shouldn't be allowed to vote because you don't contribute, financially, to our great country. That would be a great start for Trump as then Republicans would rule forever and our country would be saved from bum Socialists like you

This country doesn't need the likes of you and those like you

---

I sold my home years ago.

Your version of who should be able to vote is well suited to a small dictatorship. It is also fundamentally unAmerican in this century.

---

Only those that pay income tax should vote for our employees

People shouldn't be able to vote for how much their entitlement check will be.

What's wrong with that?

---

Glad to see you've dropped the property ownership requirement. Paying taxes to vote is unconstitutional.

Does POTUS pay taxes? Would you take away his right to vote?

---

I'd go for a constitutional competency test for the voter and the candidate tho.

---

There goes the President and a chunk of Congress.

quash said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

whitetrash said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

riflebear said:

---

---

Cut taxes taxes and flood the market with easy credit. Anyone can do that. Bush did it, Teagan did it. Then it crashes. Dems clean it up. **

---

**Longs for the days of Carter with 21% interest rates and 15% inflation.

---

What executive acts lead to those numbers?

---

The weed seems to have limited quash's brain. Presidents do more than Executive Orders, although some of Trump's success comes from simply reversing Obama's EO's.

---

If EO meant EO I would have said EO. So I left open a president's every act. Naturally you have no substantive reply, merely a pair of lies.

Sad!

---

You are so going to hate Trump's re-election, quash.

---

^^^ If the cheatin' Democrats don't succeed in stealing the election. Don't forget they will have had 4 years to work their vote fraud in the ones that were close for Shillary

---

Yeah, about that Trump commission to look into those 3 million fraudulent votes...

---

You know that's the truth too!

Didn't you say you rent and don't even own a home?

There's been proposals that those that don't own property nor pay taxes shouldn't be allowed to vote because you don't contribute, financially, to our great country. That would be a great start for Trump as then Republicans would rule forever and our country would be saved from bum Socialists like you

This country doesn't need the likes of you and those like you

---

I sold my home years ago.

Your version of who should be able to vote is well suited to a small dictatorship. It is also fundamentally unAmerican in this century.

---

Only those that pay income tax should vote for our employees

People shouldn't be able to vote for how much their entitlement check will be.

What's wrong with that?

---

Glad to see you've dropped the property ownership requirement. Paying taxes to vote is unconstitutional.

Does POTUS pay taxes? Would you take away his right to vote?

---

I'd go for a constitutional competency test for the voter and the candidate tho.

---

There goes the President and a chunk of Congress.

---

I know, right?!?! It should've been initiated long ago.

Back on topic, economy is booming

quash said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

whitetrash said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

riflebear said:

---

---

Cut taxes taxes and flood the market with easy credit. Anyone can do that. Bush did it, Teagan did it. Then it crashes. Dems clean it up. **

---

**Longs for the days of Carter with 21% interest rates and 15% inflation.

---

What executive acts lead to those numbers?

---

The weed seems to have limited quash's brain. Presidents do more than Executive Orders, although some of Trump's success comes from simply reversing Obama's EO's.

---

If EO meant EO I would have said EO. So I left open a president's every act. Naturally you have no substantive reply, merely a pair of lies.

Sad!

---

You are so going to hate Trump's re-election, quash.

---

^^^ If the cheatin' Democrats don't succeed in stealing the election. Don't forget they will have had 4 years to work their vote fraud in the ones that were close for Shillary

---

Yeah, about that Trump commission to look into those 3 million fraudulent votes...

---

You know that's the truth too!

Didn't you say you rent and don't even own a home?

There's been proposals that those that don't own property nor pay taxes shouldn't be allowed to vote because you don't contribute, financially, to our great country. That would be a great start for Trump as then Republicans would rule forever and our country would be saved from bum Socialists like you

This country doesn't need the likes of you and those like you

---

I sold my home years ago.

Your version of who should be able to vote is well suited to a small dictatorship. It is also fundamentally unAmerican in this century.

---

Only those that pay income tax should vote for our employees

People shouldn't be able to vote for how much their entitlement check will be.

What's wrong with that?

---

Glad to see you've dropped the property ownership requirement. Paying taxes to vote is unconstitutional.

Does POTUS pay taxes? Would you take away his right to vote?

---

I'd go for a constitutional competency test for the voter and the candidate tho.

---

There goes the President and a chunk of Congress.

---

This made me LOL.

Florda_mike said:

---

Back on topic, economy is booming

---

What indicators are you using, jobs, GDP, or what?

One leading indicator, freight loads, is down 50% June to June. Some of that is regression to the mean, but a big chunk of that is not. Slowing production, possibly inflationary pressures.

The "Real Economy" is never "Booming" when the wrong party holds the presidency.

YoakDaddy said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Literacy test called "We tried that. It was struck down. We thought every knew
1. how long is a piece of string?
2. How many bubbles in a bar of soap?"

---

I didn't state literacy...I stated competency. Maybe you need a literacy test.

---

I do not agree. Once there is a competency question, the advantage goes to career politicians.

We need more John Adams, fewer Woodrow Wilsons, if you take my meaning.

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Back on topic, economy is booming

---

What indicators are you using, jobs, GDP, or what?

One leading indicator, freight loads, is down 50% June to June. Some of that is regression to the mean, but a big chunk of that is not. Slowing production, possibly inflationary pressures.

---

I wish I was this smart

Waco1947 said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Back on topic, economy is booming

---

What indicators are you using, jobs, GDP, or what?

One leading indicator, freight loads, is down 50% June to June. Some of that is regression to the mean, but a big chunk of that is not. Slowing production, possibly inflationary pressures.

---

I wish I was this smart

---

If either of you 2 had meaningful employment you'd realize the ECONOMY IS BOOMING!!!

But you don't so your opinions are meaningless

Florda_mike said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Back on topic, economy is booming

---

What indicators are you using, jobs, GDP, or what?

One leading indicator, freight loads, is down 50% June to June. Some of that is regression to the mean, but a big chunk of that is not. Slowing production, possibly inflationary pressures.

---

I wish I was this smart

---

If either of you 2 had meaningful employment you'd realize the ECONOMY IS BOOMING!!!

But you don't so your opinions are meaningless

---

I have friends who are having a tough time finding employees.

D. C. Bear said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Back on topic, economy is booming

---

What indicators are you using, jobs, GDP, or what?

One leading indicator, freight loads, is down 50% June to June. Some of that is regression to the mean, but a big chunk of that is not. Slowing production, possibly inflationary pressures.

---

I wish I was this smart

---

If either of you 2 had meaningful employment you'd realize the ECONOMY IS BOOMING!!!

But you don't so your opinions are meaningless

---

I have friends who are having a tough time finding employees.

---

Absolutely

Me too

D. C. Bear said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Back on topic, economy is booming

---

What indicators are you using, jobs, GDP, or what?

One leading indicator, freight loads, is down 50% June to June. Some of that is regression to the mean, but a big chunk of that is not. Slowing production, possibly inflationary pressures.

---

I wish I was this smart

---

If either of you 2 had meaningful employment you'd realize the ECONOMY IS BOOMING!!!

But you don't so your opinions are meaningless

---

I have friends who are having a tough time finding employees.

---

I have 32 franchisees I'm responsible for. The question we get more than anything else is "do you know any one looking for a job".

We service the auto/industrial/construction industry and I assure you that if you can't find work right now in those segment you are the problem. If you're a capable auto technician or tool and die maker or welder I could probably give you a list of 100 places that are looking to hire in the 150ish miles I cover. They, literally, cannot hire enough people to staff the shops.

To be unemployed right now you'd have to be determined to not work

We'd hire anyone worth hiring in our construction area

Florda_mike said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Back on topic, economy is booming

---

What indicators are you using, jobs, GDP, or what?

One leading indicator, freight loads, is down 50% June to June. Some of that is regression to the mean, but a big chunk of that is not. Slowing production, possibly inflationary pressures.

---

I wish I was this smart

---

If either of you 2 had meaningful employment you'd realize the ECONOMY IS BOOMING!!!

But you don't so your opinions are meaningless

---

Uh, I have meaningful employment. And I asked for your measurement and you went off the rails. And I offered a leading economic indicator that might give one pause.

Anything substantive to offer at this point?

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Back on topic, economy is booming

---

What indicators are you using, jobs, GDP, or what?

One leading indicator, freight loads, is down 50% June to June. Some of that is regression to the mean, but a big chunk of that is not. Slowing production, possibly inflationary pressures.

---

I wish I was this smart

---

If either of you 2 had meaningful employment you'd realize the ECONOMY IS BOOMING!!!

But you don't so your opinions are meaningless

---

Uh, I have meaningful employment. And I asked for your measurement and you went off the rails. And I offered a leading economic indicator that might give one pause.

Anything substantive to offer at this point?

---

Aren't you a lawyer?

Q be flailing.

D. C. Bear said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Back on topic, economy is booming

---

What indicators are you using, jobs, GDP, or what?

One leading indicator, freight loads, is down 50% June to June. Some of that is regression to the mean, but a big chunk of that is not. Slowing production, possibly inflationary pressures.

---

I wish I was this smart

---

If either of you 2 had meaningful employment you'd realize the ECONOMY IS BOOMING!!!

But you don't so your opinions are meaningless

---

Uh, I have meaningful employment. And I asked for your measurement and you went off the rails. And I offered a leading economic indicator that might give one pause.

Anything substantive to offer at this point?

---

Aren't you a lawyer?

---

Employed lawyer.

Oldbear83 said:

---

Q be flailing.

---

What? He's being accused of not having a job when he does.

That's flailing? Do you ever contribute anything meaningful to a conversation? I know you're not overly smart, so you basically just make comments like your last one about other people actually making points.

You should take some time. Really put your back into it, think about it, and express an original opinion. I have faith in you and will be just so proud.

BBL: "He's being accused of not having a job when he does. "

Wasn't what I was talking about. Did you read only 2 or 3 words from Q's post? That would be par for you, these days, judging from how you blow up whenever someone posts something that you can't understand.

Oldbear83 said:

---

BBL: "He's being accused of not having a job when he does. "

Wasn't what I was talking about. Did you read only 2 or 3 words from Q's post? That would be par for you, these days, judging from how you blow up whenever someone posts something that you can't understand.

---

Jesus. You didn't say it, Florda did.

To quote one huge ***** I know: "stop drinking and grow up, son."

I'm not even having fun owning you anymore.

BrooksBearLives said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

BBL: "He's being accused of not having a job when he does. "

Wasn't what I was talking about. Did you read only 2 or 3 words from Q's post? That would be par for you, these days, judging from how you blow up whenever someone posts something that you can't understand.

---

Jesus. You didn't say it, Florda did.

To quote one huge ***** I know: "stop drinking and grow up, son."

I'm not even having fun owning you anymore.

---

Mister, you're delusional. You couldn't 'own' my dog, let alone me.

Son, you outwit yourself, you are accidental comedy when you post.

Wipe your screen, the spittle from your rants obviously makes it too hard for you to read the posts.

quash said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Back on topic, economy is booming

---

What indicators are you using, jobs, GDP, or what?

One leading indicator, freight loads, is down 50% June to June. Some of that is regression to the mean, but a big chunk of that is not. Slowing production, possibly inflationary pressures.

---

I wish I was this smart

---

If either of you 2 had meaningful employment you'd realize the ECONOMY IS BOOMING!!!

But you don't so your opinions are meaningless

---

Uh, I have meaningful employment. And I asked for your measurement and you went off the rails. And I offered a leading economic indicator that might give one pause.

Anything substantive to offer at this point?

---

Aren't you a lawyer?

---

Employed lawyer.

---

In this booming economy, how could you not be?

Florda_mike said:

---

To be unemployed right now you'd have to be determined to not work

We'd hire anyone worth hiring in our construction area

---

Same in northern Colorado.. Tradesmen here are raising their fees monthly . Son # 2 in Dallas is up to 140k per year .
Might broach 200k in a couple of years .

But D.C. nailed it earlier . The economy is never booming when the other party is in power

Any chance you'll do what Florda cannot? What metric are you using for the boom?

quash said:

---

Any chance you'll do what Florda cannot? What metric are you using for the boom?

---

I'm not characterizing the economy one way or another. Just observing that we have more jobs than workers right now in a number of places.

quash said:

---

Any chance you'll do what Florda cannot? What metric are you using for the boom?

---

^^^ You've gotta be blind to make a statement like this

They can't hire enough truckers because government started strictly enforcing number of hours driven and you give some chicken **** trucking stat. Eff off

You're an effing democrat tool and idiot just like Waco

Even if you were a lawyer you'd be unemployable because you'd have a terrible reputation around town

You're just another anti-American democrat joke