Black Lives Matter folks
254...you have as much intelligence as an amoeba. All you do is stir up trouble. By the way, if you really want to understand half of what you speak I would strongly advise you to devour everything Eudora Welty wrote. I don't think you have a clue about what different races go through on so-called daily basis. You can't be everywhere at once. You have much deeper issues than talking trash on here. What's wit the "lol" crap after every sentence. That is one of the things that makes you look so diminished and small.BaylorBears_254 said:Timbear said:
Please don't act like an idiot, 254. You may have other problems that you blame on Racism.
Im no idiot Timmy lol. I blame nothing on racism. I just understand the different aspects of what the world shows and what certain races go through on a daily basis masta
he just enjoys being a smart ***. I' ve blocked himTimbear said:
254 is the only one using Racial terms. This isn't 1860, and 254 has never been a slave. What's this masta crap. Is that a new pasta dish at Olive Garden?
PartyBear said:
No
Corrected for accuracyPartyBear said:
Baylor is finally in the USSR. These are good steps.
They also have a plank about getting rid of capitalism and another pro abortion plank, that they conveniently leave off their main web site.SIC EM 94 said:
When will Baylor/Livingstone issue a statement about how Baylor's Christian mission compares to the stated beliefs of the Black Lives Matter movement?
https://blacklivesmatter.com/what-we-believe/
If you thought the whole BOR/Pepper Hamilton fiasco was a disaster, just wait to see how this plays out!
Jack Bauer said:
And so Rice University is going to become Nerd Houston University?
PartyBear said:
Baylor is finally in the 21st Century. These are good steps.
So please let us know what people born between 1946 and 1964 hate exactly? So you are prejudiced against people solely because of their age? You are a work in progress. Not sure you got this woke thing completely figured out yet.bear2be2 said:
A question for all you boomers out there:
Change, for one.RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:So please let us know what people born between 1946 and 1964 hate exactly? So you are prejudiced against people solely because of their age? You are a work in progress. Not sure you got this woke thing completely figured out yet.bear2be2 said:
A question for all you boomers out there:
Most of the time, change can be good. But many times, change for the sake of change can be fatal. I have seen it happen to companies, countries, and people.bear2be2 said:Change, for one.RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:So please let us know what people born between 1946 and 1964 hate exactly? So you are prejudiced against people solely because of their age? You are a work in progress. Not sure you got this woke thing completely figured out yet.bear2be2 said:
A question for all you boomers out there:
bear2be2 said:
A question for all you boomers out there:
How is changing or removing monuments erasing history?Goldgreenbear said:PartyBear said:
Baylor is finally in the 21st Century. These are good steps.
Good steps? How so? Erasing history in an attempt to replace it? For heavens sake, the school was founded in 1845!!!! People had slaves. Im not advocating that that is a good thing. But it happened. All over! You think renaming the university is the right thing? Thats cool. I, along with thousands of others, will be happy to start a lawsuit opposing any such change. And leave Judge Baylor's statue the hell alone! If the school changes its name, I will definitely sue for tuition reimbursement. I attended Baylor University. Not whatever the hell Millenial PC crap one of you comes up with.
George Truett said:How is changing or removing monuments erasing history?Goldgreenbear said:PartyBear said:
Baylor is finally in the 21st Century. These are good steps.
Good steps? How so? Erasing history in an attempt to replace it? For heavens sake, the school was founded in 1845!!!! People had slaves. Im not advocating that that is a good thing. But it happened. All over! You think renaming the university is the right thing? Thats cool. I, along with thousands of others, will be happy to start a lawsuit opposing any such change. And leave Judge Baylor's statue the hell alone! If the school changes its name, I will definitely sue for tuition reimbursement. I attended Baylor University. Not whatever the hell Millenial PC crap one of you comes up with.
It appears to me that they're bringing more history to the conversation and hopefully replacing a sanitized history with the real one.
We need to be open and reckon with our sins of racism, xenophobia, and more.
To be sure, our historical leaders were persons of their times. But even by the standards of their times, some of them were pretty bad. Judge Baylor is one of them.
Pretty sure we have a thread with Grayson or Ashley asking people not to call people racist or other derogatory terms. Come on guys. Be somewhat civilSIC EM 94 said:PartyBear said:SIC EM 94 said:PartyBear said:
Baylor is finally in the 21st Century. These are good steps.
Shame on you for referring to it as "Baylor" you racist!
Shame on you for being a dumb ass!
You don't think there will be a push to rename the school?
disregard, it's early in the morning lolOsodecentx said:
Oxford University's chancellor, Chris Patten, discussed student demands to remove Cecil Rhodes statue on BBC radio.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/oxford-letter-to-students/
"But if people at a university are not prepared to demonstrate the sort of generosity of spirit which Nelson Mandela showed towards Rhodes and towards history, if they are not prepared to embrace all those values which are contained in the most important book for any undergraduate, Karl Popper's Open Society, if they are not prepared to embrace those issues then maybe they should think about being educated elsewhere. But I hope they will embrace those issues and engage in debate."
Patten styled the objections to Rhodes as along the lines of the "safe spaces" policies adopted on many university campuses in Britain and the US, which critics have said are used to suppress debate on a range of issues.
"That focus on Rhodes is unfortunate but it's an example of what's happening in American campuses and British campuses," Patten said. "One of the points of a university which is not to tolerate intolerance, to engage in free inquiry and debate is being denied. People have to face up to facts in history which they don't like and talk about them and debate them."
He added: "Can you imagine a university where there is no platform? I mean a bland diet of bran to feed people, it's an absolutely terrible idea. If you want universities like that you go to China where they are not allowed to talk about western values, which I regard as global values. No, it's not the way a university should operate."
It isn't a letter. It is a transcript of an interview on BBC radio. Snopes published it as true.Shippou said:Why are you running with a false letter? Like you pulled it off of snopes and it said "false", and you still posted it trying to prove your point, lol.Osodecentx said:
Oxford University's chancellor, Chris Patten, discussed student demands to remove Cecil Rhodes statue on BBC radio.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/oxford-letter-to-students/
"But if people at a university are not prepared to demonstrate the sort of generosity of spirit which Nelson Mandela showed towards Rhodes and towards history, if they are not prepared to embrace all those values which are contained in the most important book for any undergraduate, Karl Popper's Open Society, if they are not prepared to embrace those issues then maybe they should think about being educated elsewhere. But I hope they will embrace those issues and engage in debate."
Patten styled the objections to Rhodes as along the lines of the "safe spaces" policies adopted on many university campuses in Britain and the US, which critics have said are used to suppress debate on a range of issues.
"That focus on Rhodes is unfortunate but it's an example of what's happening in American campuses and British campuses," Patten said. "One of the points of a university which is not to tolerate intolerance, to engage in free inquiry and debate is being denied. People have to face up to facts in history which they don't like and talk about them and debate them."
He added: "Can you imagine a university where there is no platform? I mean a bland diet of bran to feed people, it's an absolutely terrible idea. If you want universities like that you go to China where they are not allowed to talk about western values, which I regard as global values. No, it's not the way a university should operate."
No hay prolemaShippou said:disregard, it's early in the morning lolOsodecentx said:
Oxford University's chancellor, Chris Patten, discussed student demands to remove Cecil Rhodes statue on BBC radio.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/oxford-letter-to-students/
"But if people at a university are not prepared to demonstrate the sort of generosity of spirit which Nelson Mandela showed towards Rhodes and towards history, if they are not prepared to embrace all those values which are contained in the most important book for any undergraduate, Karl Popper's Open Society, if they are not prepared to embrace those issues then maybe they should think about being educated elsewhere. But I hope they will embrace those issues and engage in debate."
Patten styled the objections to Rhodes as along the lines of the "safe spaces" policies adopted on many university campuses in Britain and the US, which critics have said are used to suppress debate on a range of issues.
"That focus on Rhodes is unfortunate but it's an example of what's happening in American campuses and British campuses," Patten said. "One of the points of a university which is not to tolerate intolerance, to engage in free inquiry and debate is being denied. People have to face up to facts in history which they don't like and talk about them and debate them."
He added: "Can you imagine a university where there is no platform? I mean a bland diet of bran to feed people, it's an absolutely terrible idea. If you want universities like that you go to China where they are not allowed to talk about western values, which I regard as global values. No, it's not the way a university should operate."
South Africa is actually the perfect case study for the future we are heading in. Nelson Mandela was a gentile, humble, and forgiving leader who was followed by progressively more divisive and corrupt leaders who tanked the country's economy and infrastructure by aggressively going after whites and creating a massive "brain drain".Osodecentx said:
Oxford University's chancellor, Chris Patten, discussed student demands to remove Cecil Rhodes statue on BBC radio.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/oxford-letter-to-students/
"But if people at a university are not prepared to demonstrate the sort of generosity of spirit which Nelson Mandela showed towards Rhodes and towards history, if they are not prepared to embrace all those values which are contained in the most important book for any undergraduate, Karl Popper's Open Society, if they are not prepared to embrace those issues then maybe they should think about being educated elsewhere. But I hope they will embrace those issues and engage in debate."
Patten styled the objections to Rhodes as along the lines of the "safe spaces" policies adopted on many university campuses in Britain and the US, which critics have said are used to suppress debate on a range of issues.
"That focus on Rhodes is unfortunate but it's an example of what's happening in American campuses and British campuses," Patten said. "One of the points of a university which is not to tolerate intolerance, to engage in free inquiry and debate is being denied. People have to face up to facts in history which they don't like and talk about them and debate them."
He added: "Can you imagine a university where there is no platform? I mean a bland diet of bran to feed people, it's an absolutely terrible idea. If you want universities like that you go to China where they are not allowed to talk about western values, which I regard as global values. No, it's not the way a university should operate."
I'm curious if you and the multitude of others here have even read the resolution. They are looking at changing the names of some buildings. This part isnt to you Mothra but to others here: Please stop trying to exaggerate everything and then calling what yall have completely made up communism.Mothra said:PartyBear said:
No
If Baylor owned slaves, you can bet your life on it.
Well when they change the names of buildings and remove statues and moments from campus... I am sure BMD like you will step in and fill the fundraising void that will follow.PartyBear said:I'm curious if you and the multitude of others here have even read the resolution. They are looking at changing the names of some buildings. This part isnt to you Mothra but to others here: Please stop trying to exaggerate everything and then calling what yall have completely made up communism.Mothra said:PartyBear said:
No
If Baylor owned slaves, you can bet your life on it.
I doubt there will be an exodus of donors because of the renaming of a few buildings that no living donors knew nor had ever heard of the namesake outside of that specific building.The_barBEARian said:Well when they change the names of buildings and remove statues and moments from campus... I am sure BMD like you will step in and fill the fundraising void that will follow.PartyBear said:I'm curious if you and the multitude of others here have even read the resolution. They are looking at changing the names of some buildings. This part isnt to you Mothra but to others here: Please stop trying to exaggerate everything and then calling what yall have completely made up communism.Mothra said:PartyBear said:
No
If Baylor owned slaves, you can bet your life on it.
Do you think Judge Baylor's statue will not be removed? Is this an exaggeration?PartyBear said:I'm curious if you and the multitude of others here have even read the resolution. They are looking at changing the names of some buildings. This part isnt to you Mothra but to others here: Please stop trying to exaggerate everything and then calling what yall have completely made up communism.Mothra said:PartyBear said:
No
If Baylor owned slaves, you can bet your life on it.
Exactly I doubt many donors or perhaps even any donors actually have the views and attitudes that are prevalent on this R&P board. I dont think the views prevalent on this board are representative at all of even the more conservative folks in the Baylor Nation/Family. The more jaded side of me actually ponders they know this and that is why this was such a seemingly easy and quick call for them to make. There was no himming and hawing and equivocating over this and outward worry about appeasing certain elements as would have been done under previous leadership including McCall and Reynolds.Mitch Henessey said:I doubt there will be an exodus of donors because of the renaming of a few buildings that no living donors knew nor had ever heard of the namesake outside of that specific building.The_barBEARian said:Well when they change the names of buildings and remove statues and moments from campus... I am sure BMD like you will step in and fill the fundraising void that will follow.PartyBear said:I'm curious if you and the multitude of others here have even read the resolution. They are looking at changing the names of some buildings. This part isnt to you Mothra but to others here: Please stop trying to exaggerate everything and then calling what yall have completely made up communism.Mothra said:PartyBear said:
No
If Baylor owned slaves, you can bet your life on it.