2020 ELECTION FRAUD THREAD

160,657 Views | 1683 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by Texasjeremy
BaylorBears_254
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:10p, 11/5/20
I have a huge feeling that of the shoe were on the other foot you guys would be milking and enjoying this.

Yet, you consider yourselves fair men/women who want a "fair race".

The race isn't even over yet and you guys are speaking like true losers...The guy can still win, relax
Reply Quote
Aliceinbubbleland
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Jack Bauer • 12:14p, 11/5/20
It has been a very strange election. Normally you'd think a President would sweep his parties candidates into office but that hasn't been true in this election.

The House results were a huge surprise.

Texas being heavily run was a surprise.

The turnout for Trump was beyond belief.

Reply Quote
Forest Bueller_bf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aliceinbubbleland • 12:18p, 11/5/20
Aliceinbubbleland said:
Everyone hates to lose. Republicans are now feeling just like Democrats in 2000. It is time to move on. Looking at the popular vote it is a little silly to argue over the current ballots at the heart of the conspiracy.

Trump ran so much better than expected because a ton of his supporters "hid". In our neighborhood here in Houston you rarely saw Trump signs but you saw tons of other Republican candidates signs.

I predict you will be saying President Harris before 2024

I've already accepted Trump will end up losing.

There needs to be very serious updates in the tally of mail in ballots.

They need to be verified. Meaning legal voter, legal signature, etc. The tally of mail in ballots also need to be observed by trained impartial poll watchers.

There needs to be uniform rules and vote tally methods for General elections for all states, even though it is handled by individual states.



Reply Quote
1 edit
Doc Holliday
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:19p, 11/5/20
Reply Quote
Forest Bueller_bf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Doc Holliday • 12:22p, 11/5/20
Doc Holliday said:
Reply Quote
Dnicknames
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:25p, 11/5/20
The overwhelming likelihood is:

1) Republicans maintain majority in the Senate
2) Democrats maintain majority in the House but lose seats to GOP
3) Democrats win the White House

It's not terrible for either party
Reply Quote
whitetrash
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:27p, 11/5/20
For the really oldtimers around here, do you get the feeling the vote count is being run by the UALR clock operator during the 1987 NIT?
Reply Quote
Jack Bauer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Dnicknames • 12:28p, 11/5/20
Dnicknames said:
The overwhelming likelihood is:

1) Republicans maintain majority in the Senate
2) Democrats maintain majority in the House but lose seats to GOP
3) Democrats win the White House

It's not terrible for either party
I see this in the Senate: 48-48 per NYT (assuming MI stays Dem)
1) Alaska- should be GOP, not sure why not called
2) NC - GOP with a narrow lead, ballot counting on hold
3) GA - Perdue looking to a runoff
4) GA - Loeffler looking to a runoff

I could see about a $1B poured into the 2 GA runoff elections in January.
Reply Quote
Jack Bauer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:29p, 11/5/20
Current (2018) House is
Dems: 235
GOP: 199

Reply Quote
1 edit
Forest Bueller_bf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:30p, 11/5/20
Another thing, I literally hate racial stereotyping, people should be able to think however they wish no matter their race, and vote for whom they wish and not be called a racial trope if they don't "fall in line" Hispanics often have been the subject of stereotyping.

The 4 southern most border counties which are virtually all Hispanic in population, has these voter results.

Zapata 53% Trump
Starr 47% Trump
Hidalgo 41% Trump
Cameron 43% Trump



Reply Quote
Booray
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Forest Bueller_bf • 12:32p, 11/5/20
Forest Bueller_bf said:
Aliceinbubbleland said:
Everyone hates to lose. Republicans are now feeling just like Democrats in 2000. It is time to move on. Looking at the popular vote it is a little silly to argue over the current ballots at the heart of the conspiracy.

Trump ran so much better than expected because a ton of his supporters "hid". In our neighborhood here in Houston you rarely saw Trump signs but you saw tons of other Republican candidates signs.

I predict you will be saying President Harris before 2024

I've already accepted Trump will end up losing.

There needs to be very serious updates in the tally of mail in ballots.

They need to be verified. Meaning legal voter, legal signature, etc. The tally of mail in ballots also need to be observed by trained impartial poll watchers.

There needs to be uniform rules and vote tally methods for General elections for all states, even though it is handled by individual states.



Where are you going to find people who fit that description?

There is nothing inherently wrong with mail-in ballots. There hasn't been massive, if any, fraud. But I support changes necessary to give everyone assurance that this is done fairly.

The problem is that it is almost impossible to satisfy the crazies; they come up with off the wall stuff and seize on every slight error as evidence of massive conspiracies.
Reply Quote
Booray
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Forest Bueller_bf • 12:33p, 11/5/20
Forest Bueller_bf said:
Another thing, I literally hate racial stereotyping, people should be able to think however they wish no matter their race, and vote for whom they wish and not be called a racial trope if they don't "fall in line" Hispanics often have been the subject of stereotyping.

The 4 southern most border counties which are virtually all Hispanic in population, has these voter results.

Zapata 53% Trump
Starr 47% Trump
Hidalgo 41% Trump
Cameron 43% Trump



Note: all counties run by Democrats, votes counted by Democrats.
Reply Quote
trey3216
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aliceinbubbleland • 12:34p, 11/5/20
Aliceinbubbleland said:
Everyone hates to lose. Republicans are now feeling just like Democrats in 2000. It is time to move on. Looking at the popular vote it is a little silly to argue over the current ballots at the heart of the conspiracy.

Trump ran so much better than expected because a ton of his supporters "hid". In our neighborhood here in Houston you rarely saw Trump signs but you saw tons of other Republican candidates signs.

I predict you will be saying President Harris before 2024

You spelled 2022 wrong
Mr. Treehorn treats objects like women, man.
Reply Quote
Jack Bauer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Forest Bueller_bf • 12:34p, 11/5/20
Forest Bueller_bf said:
Another thing, I literally hate racial stereotyping, people should be able to think however they wish no matter their race, and vote for whom they wish and not be called a racial trope if they don't "fall in line" Hispanics often have been the subject of stereotyping.

The 4 southern most border counties which are virtually all Hispanic in population, has these voter results.

Zapata 53% Trump
Starr 47% Trump
Hidalgo 41% Trump
Cameron 43% Trump
A bunch of white liberals voted out a 'racist' President who had the highest turnout of minorities for the GOP since 1960....you can't make this stuff up.
Reply Quote
Forest Bueller_bf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Booray • 12:34p, 11/5/20
Booray said:
Forest Bueller_bf said:
Aliceinbubbleland said:
Everyone hates to lose. Republicans are now feeling just like Democrats in 2000. It is time to move on. Looking at the popular vote it is a little silly to argue over the current ballots at the heart of the conspiracy.

Trump ran so much better than expected because a ton of his supporters "hid". In our neighborhood here in Houston you rarely saw Trump signs but you saw tons of other Republican candidates signs.

I predict you will be saying President Harris before 2024

I've already accepted Trump will end up losing.

There needs to be very serious updates in the tally of mail in ballots.

They need to be verified. Meaning legal voter, legal signature, etc. The tally of mail in ballots also need to be observed by trained impartial poll watchers.

There needs to be uniform rules and vote tally methods for General elections for all states, even though it is handled by individual states.



Where are you going to find people who fit that description?

There is nothing inherently wrong with mail-in ballots. There hasn't been massive, if any, fraud. But I support changes necessary to give everyone assurance that this is done fairly.

The problem is that it is almost impossible to satisfy the crazies; they come up with off the wall stuff and seize on every slight error as evidence of massive conspiracies.
I suppose to be totally upfront, a democrat watcher in a republican precinct and a republican watcher in a democrat precinct. It wouldn't be that difficult to do.
Reply Quote
Forest Bueller_bf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to trey3216 • 12:35p, 11/5/20
trey3216 said:
Aliceinbubbleland said:
Everyone hates to lose. Republicans are now feeling just like Democrats in 2000. It is time to move on. Looking at the popular vote it is a little silly to argue over the current ballots at the heart of the conspiracy.

Trump ran so much better than expected because a ton of his supporters "hid". In our neighborhood here in Houston you rarely saw Trump signs but you saw tons of other Republican candidates signs.

I predict you will be saying President Harris before 2024

You spelled 2022 wrong

This is gold
Reply Quote
wuzzybear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sam Lowry • 12:36p, 11/5/20
Sam Lowry said:
wuzzybear said:
Ballots are coming out of the Stacey Abrams a-s-s...guaranteed.
R's just want to count all LEGAL votes. D's want to create, harvest, manufacture, procreate ballots.
I cannot possibly see Trump packing his bags ANYTIME soon.

That is why the polls were so wrong. Somebody should start a thread with a list of all the ways you can rig an election. If not, I will do it.

Start with the obvious:
1. Ballot harvesting
2. Allowing votes NOT postmarked.
3. Allowing ballot drop off like fast food.
4. Disinformation campaign by MSM
5. Claim a landslide victory for voter suppression
6. Call states before polls are closed.
7. Create a blue by blue state collusion kabal.
8. Mail ballots without the recipient asking for it aka mass mail out like coupons!
9. Throw your opponents ballots in the file 13.
10. Never allow observers.

????????????????????
It's a theory, so it must be true.
Wrong, it must be proven
Reply Quote
Canada2017
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aliceinbubbleland • 12:37p, 11/5/20
Aliceinbubbleland said:
I did. The 2000 election. The media had a hissy fit over hanging chad.


You are not producing any specifics whatsoever.
Reply Quote
Jack Bauer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Forest Bueller_bf • 12:38p, 11/5/20
Forest Bueller_bf said:
trey3216 said:
Aliceinbubbleland said:
Everyone hates to lose. Republicans are now feeling just like Democrats in 2000. It is time to move on. Looking at the popular vote it is a little silly to argue over the current ballots at the heart of the conspiracy.

Trump ran so much better than expected because a ton of his supporters "hid". In our neighborhood here in Houston you rarely saw Trump signs but you saw tons of other Republican candidates signs.

I predict you will be saying President Harris before 2024

You spelled 2022 wrong

This is gold
The first female President in American history will not be elected in directly by the voters.
Reply Quote
Forest Bueller_bf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Jack Bauer • 12:38p, 11/5/20
Jack Bauer said:
Forest Bueller_bf said:
Another thing, I literally hate racial stereotyping, people should be able to think however they wish no matter their race, and vote for whom they wish and not be called a racial trope if they don't "fall in line" Hispanics often have been the subject of stereotyping.

The 4 southern most border counties which are virtually all Hispanic in population, has these voter results.

Zapata 53% Trump
Starr 47% Trump
Hidalgo 41% Trump
Cameron 43% Trump
A bunch of white liberals voted out a 'racist' President who had the highest turnout of minorities for the GOP since 1960....you can't make this stuff up.
This is absolutely correct. Trump lost the suburban woke crowd. That is their right.
Reply Quote
1 edit
Doc Holliday
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:39p, 11/5/20
Reply Quote
wuzzybear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Forest Bueller_bf • 12:39p, 11/5/20
Forest Bueller_bf said:
trey3216 said:
Aliceinbubbleland said:
Everyone hates to lose. Republicans are now feeling just like Democrats in 2000. It is time to move on. Looking at the popular vote it is a little silly to argue over the current ballots at the heart of the conspiracy.

Trump ran so much better than expected because a ton of his supporters "hid". In our neighborhood here in Houston you rarely saw Trump signs but you saw tons of other Republican candidates signs.

I predict you will be saying President Harris before 2024

You spelled 2022 wrong

This is gold
My neighbor replace his Trump yard sign with a yard sign that read in black and white:

"YARD SIGN"
Reply Quote
wuzzybear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Jack Bauer • 12:40p, 11/5/20
Jack Bauer said:
Forest Bueller_bf said:
trey3216 said:
Aliceinbubbleland said:
Everyone hates to lose. Republicans are now feeling just like Democrats in 2000. It is time to move on. Looking at the popular vote it is a little silly to argue over the current ballots at the heart of the conspiracy.

Trump ran so much better than expected because a ton of his supporters "hid". In our neighborhood here in Houston you rarely saw Trump signs but you saw tons of other Republican candidates signs.

I predict you will be saying President Harris before 2024

You spelled 2022 wrong

This is gold
The first female President in American history will not be elected in directly by the voters.
Stop counting your chickens cuz they ain't hatched yet
Reply Quote
Jacques Strap
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:41p, 11/5/20




Reply Quote
2 edits
Doc Holliday
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:42p, 11/5/20
It will take two weeks to flatten the curve of Trump votes.
Reply Quote
STxBear81
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:43p, 11/5/20
Where does it show Trump is gaining in Az, and what is current tally Last I saw was -68k
Reply Quote
trey3216
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to wuzzybear • 12:44p, 11/5/20
wuzzybear said:
Sam Lowry said:
wuzzybear said:
Ballots are coming out of the Stacey Abrams a-s-s...guaranteed.
R's just want to count all LEGAL votes. D's want to create, harvest, manufacture, procreate ballots.
I cannot possibly see Trump packing his bags ANYTIME soon.

That is why the polls were so wrong. Somebody should start a thread with a list of all the ways you can rig an election. If not, I will do it.

Start with the obvious:
1. Ballot harvesting
2. Allowing votes NOT postmarked.
3. Allowing ballot drop off like fast food.
4. Disinformation campaign by MSM
5. Claim a landslide victory for voter suppression
6. Call states before polls are closed.
7. Create a blue by blue state collusion kabal.
8. Mail ballots without the recipient asking for it aka mass mail out like coupons!
9. Throw your opponents ballots in the file 13.
10. Never allow observers.

????????????????????
It's a theory, so it must be true.
Wrong, it must be proven

So it's a hypothesis
Mr. Treehorn treats objects like women, man.
Reply Quote
wuzzybear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to trey3216 • 12:50p, 11/5/20
trey3216 said:
wuzzybear said:
Sam Lowry said:
wuzzybear said:
Ballots are coming out of the Stacey Abrams a-s-s...guaranteed.
R's just want to count all LEGAL votes. D's want to create, harvest, manufacture, procreate ballots.
I cannot possibly see Trump packing his bags ANYTIME soon.

That is why the polls were so wrong. Somebody should start a thread with a list of all the ways you can rig an election. If not, I will do it.

Start with the obvious:
1. Ballot harvesting
2. Allowing votes NOT postmarked.
3. Allowing ballot drop off like fast food.
4. Disinformation campaign by MSM
5. Claim a landslide victory for voter suppression
6. Call states before polls are closed.
7. Create a blue by blue state collusion kabal.
8. Mail ballots without the recipient asking for it aka mass mail out like coupons!
9. Throw your opponents ballots in the file 13.
10. Never allow observers.

????????????????????
It's a theory, so it must be true.
Wrong, it must be proven

So it's a hypothesis
Theories are a set of parameters that REQUIRE proof. Hypotheses are "what ifs."
Reply Quote
Forest Bueller_bf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to STxBear81 • 12:51p, 11/5/20
BornAgain said:
Where does it show Trump is gaining in Az, and what is current tally Last I saw was -68k
It was 93K last night, I think that is the batch of votes they are talking about.

So if Trump is getting 58% of the remaining 500,000 votes he gains 80K, and he ends up winning by 12K votes.
Reply Quote
Booray
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Forest Bueller_bf • 12:53p, 11/5/20
Forest Bueller_bf said:
BornAgain said:
Where does it show Trump is gaining in Az, and what is current tally Last I saw was -68k
It was 93K last night, I think that is the batch of votes they are talking about.

So if Trump is getting 58% of the remaining 500,000 votes he gains 80K, and he ends up winning by 12K votes.
Az. and Ga. are both going to be really, really close.

That is all anybody can say with certainty.
Reply Quote
Doc Holliday
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Booray • 12:55p, 11/5/20
Booray said:
Forest Bueller_bf said:
BornAgain said:
Where does it show Trump is gaining in Az, and what is current tally Last I saw was -68k
It was 93K last night, I think that is the batch of votes they are talking about.

So if Trump is getting 58% of the remaining 500,000 votes he gains 80K, and he ends up winning by 12K votes.
Az. and Ga. are both going to be really, really close.

That is all anybody can say with certainty.
Why are these states so unbelievably bad with the voting process?
Reply Quote
blackie
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to STxBear81 • 12:57p, 11/5/20
BornAgain said:
Where does it show Trump is gaining in Az, and what is current tally Last I saw was -68k
That's what I heard also, and that there would be no more updates until 9 tonight (AZ time).
Reply Quote
Jack Bauer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Booray • 12:57p, 11/5/20
Booray said:
Forest Bueller_bf said:
BornAgain said:
Where does it show Trump is gaining in Az, and what is current tally Last I saw was -68k
It was 93K last night, I think that is the batch of votes they are talking about.

So if Trump is getting 58% of the remaining 500,000 votes he gains 80K, and he ends up winning by 12K votes.
Az. and Ga. are both going to be really, really close.

That is all anybody can say with certainty.
I could see recounts in AZ, GA, WI, PA and maybe NV.
Reply Quote
LTbear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Booray • 12:58p, 11/5/20
Booray said:
Forest Bueller_bf said:
BornAgain said:
Where does it show Trump is gaining in Az, and what is current tally Last I saw was -68k
It was 93K last night, I think that is the batch of votes they are talking about.

So if Trump is getting 58% of the remaining 500,000 votes he gains 80K, and he ends up winning by 12K votes.
Az. and Ga. are both going to be really, really close.

That is all anybody can say with certainty.
Shame those 150,000 ballots from heavily blue-leaning areas of GA got delivered late and thus disqualified by the USPS, or it wouldn't be close.
Reply Quote
Booray
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Jack Bauer • 1:01p, 11/5/20
Jack Bauer said:
Booray said:
Forest Bueller_bf said:
BornAgain said:
Where does it show Trump is gaining in Az, and what is current tally Last I saw was -68k
It was 93K last night, I think that is the batch of votes they are talking about.

So if Trump is getting 58% of the remaining 500,000 votes he gains 80K, and he ends up winning by 12K votes.
Az. and Ga. are both going to be really, really close.

That is all anybody can say with certainty.
I could see recounts in AZ, GA, WI, PA and maybe NV.
The difference is that recounts in Az. and Ga. might actually be meaningful.

Recounts seek basically tabulation errors; they don't review whether the ballot was appropriately cast.. So they don't move the needle much. But if either state is down to a difference of a few thousand votes, it won't take much needle moving to change the outcome.
Reply Quote
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.