2020 ELECTION FRAUD THREAD

162,246 Views | 1683 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by Texasjeremy
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
trey3216 said:

Shippou said:

Doc Holliday said:

Shippou said:

BornAgain said:

more like expect President Xi
President Xi, please liberate America.
Yes comrade
We can dream.
You dream about putting people in slave camps because of their religion? How woke of you
The largest vote share of Biden supporters were nonreligious along with unmarried women

Trump did better than 2016 in every demographic except white males and non-religious voters.
George Truett
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

It is over. The Democrats have "found" the votes they needed. What a travesty. We have turned into just another Banana Republic. My heart is heavy for our Democracy and Republic.
I think it's a great day for democracy and decency.

But I do think we all need to try to make our dialogue more constructive.
trey3216
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gruvin said:

trey3216 said:

Shippou said:

Doc Holliday said:

Shippou said:

BornAgain said:

more like expect President Xi
President Xi, please liberate America.
Yes comrade
We can dream.
You dream about putting people in slave camps because of their religion? How woke of you
The largest vote share of Biden supporters were nonreligious
I was talking about Shippou's hope for a President Xi style government.
Mr. Treehorn treats objects like women, man.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Holding the idea that all the mail in votes were fraudulent means that you believe Donald Trump won Pennsylvania by over 600,000 votes, Mich. and Wisc. by similar percentage margins, which is just absurd."

No, it just means Biden's Fracking gaffe really was that important.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
George Truett
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gruvin said:

George Truett said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Everyone knew Trump won 2016 with the slim margins yet shocking results in those rust belt states. His margins were so thin in 2016 you could see this result coming. The Democrats were probably much better organized in Wis, Mich and PA and for certain in NV.

In 2018 Pelosi and money brought the House back to the Democrats. They put that effort into 2020 Presidential race this time. The Democrats probably ignored the House races thinking the polls gave them the wave.

Biden won. Trump lost. The only dangling issue is the Senate races.

When you look at the percentage of Trump wins in the red states the biggest shock of all is the contest in GA.
GA is really big.

Stacey Abrams is part of the difference. About 6 years ago, she started "The New Georgia Project," the aim of which was to make the vote in Georgia look more like the makeup of GA.

This was a direct result of that.

Looks like Ossoff is going to lose, but Warnock may have a chance in the runoff. If Blacks vote the way they did in this election and Trump supporters stay home because Trump isn't on the ballot, Warnock could win.
yes, Stacy Abram's campaign was really big. They found a loophole in order to ballot harvest legally and Georgia was not smart enough to close at Loophole before the presidential election.
So you're saying this happened in a completely Republican-controlled state?

Right.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
George Truett said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

It is over. The Democrats have "found" the votes they needed. What a travesty. We have turned into just another Banana Republic. My heart is heavy for our Democracy and Republic.
I think it's a great day for democracy and decency.

But I do think we all need to try to make our dialogue more constructive.
how sad that you cheer on democracy as it dies...

Nothing about this election says we have done our best to maintain election integretity...

We welcome constructive dialog from the left, it will be a welcome change...
Shippou
How long do you want to ignore this user?
trey3216 said:

Gruvin said:

trey3216 said:

Shippou said:

Doc Holliday said:

Shippou said:

BornAgain said:

more like expect President Xi
President Xi, please liberate America.
Yes comrade
We can dream.
You dream about putting people in slave camps because of their religion? How woke of you
The largest vote share of Biden supporters were nonreligious
I was talking about Shippou's hope for a President Xi style government.
That was a joke.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
George Truett said:

Gruvin said:

George Truett said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Everyone knew Trump won 2016 with the slim margins yet shocking results in those rust belt states. His margins were so thin in 2016 you could see this result coming. The Democrats were probably much better organized in Wis, Mich and PA and for certain in NV.

In 2018 Pelosi and money brought the House back to the Democrats. They put that effort into 2020 Presidential race this time. The Democrats probably ignored the House races thinking the polls gave them the wave.

Biden won. Trump lost. The only dangling issue is the Senate races.

When you look at the percentage of Trump wins in the red states the biggest shock of all is the contest in GA.
GA is really big.

Stacey Abrams is part of the difference. About 6 years ago, she started "The New Georgia Project," the aim of which was to make the vote in Georgia look more like the makeup of GA.

This was a direct result of that.

Looks like Ossoff is going to lose, but Warnock may have a chance in the runoff. If Blacks vote the way they did in this election and Trump supporters stay home because Trump isn't on the ballot, Warnock could win.
yes, Stacy Abram's campaign was really big. They found a loophole in order to ballot harvest legally and Georgia was not smart enough to close at Loophole before the presidential election.
So you're saying this happened in a completely Republican-controlled state?

Right.
yes, if you will remove your head from your posterior region then you would know your statement is false. Ponder it and get back to me... or continue to beat up strawmen
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Shippou said:

trey3216 said:

Gruvin said:

trey3216 said:

Shippou said:

Doc Holliday said:

Shippou said:

BornAgain said:

more like expect President Xi
President Xi, please liberate America.
Yes comrade
We can dream.
You dream about putting people in slave camps because of their religion? How woke of you
The largest vote share of Biden supporters were nonreligious
I was talking about Shippou's hope for a President Xi style government.
That was a joke.
my bad... fact still stands
Shippou
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gruvin said:

Shippou said:

trey3216 said:

Gruvin said:

trey3216 said:

Shippou said:

Doc Holliday said:

Shippou said:

BornAgain said:

more like expect President Xi
President Xi, please liberate America.
Yes comrade
We can dream.
You dream about putting people in slave camps because of their religion? How woke of you
The largest vote share of Biden supporters were nonreligious
I was talking about Shippou's hope for a President Xi style government.
That was a joke.
my bad... fact still stands
If I believed in American electoral politics I probably would've voted and increased that number. But my mail in ballot didn't get here till the day before.

But that apparently didn't stop others from sending theirs in
br53
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Shippou said:

Gruvin said:

Shippou said:

trey3216 said:

Gruvin said:

trey3216 said:

Shippou said:

Doc Holliday said:

Shippou said:

BornAgain said:

more like expect President Xi
President Xi, please liberate America.
Yes comrade
We can dream.
You dream about putting people in slave camps because of their religion? How woke of you
The largest vote share of Biden supporters were nonreligious
I was talking about Shippou's hope for a President Xi style government.
That was a joke.
my bad... fact still stands
If I believed in American electoral politics I probably would've voted and increased that number. But my mail in ballot didn't get here till the day before.

But that apparently didn't stop others from sending theirs in
Apparently alot of dead people got their mail in a timely manner.
whitetrash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Shippou said:

Gruvin said:

Shippou said:

trey3216 said:

Gruvin said:

trey3216 said:

Shippou said:

Doc Holliday said:

Shippou said:

BornAgain said:

more like expect President Xi
President Xi, please liberate America.
Yes comrade
We can dream.
You dream about putting people in slave camps because of their religion? How woke of you
The largest vote share of Biden supporters were nonreligious
I was talking about Shippou's hope for a President Xi style government.
That was a joke.
my bad... fact still stands
If I believed in American electoral politics I probably would've voted and increased that number. But my mail in ballot didn't get here till the day before.

But that apparently didn't stop others from sending theirs in
Or depending on where you live, sending yours in too.
George Truett
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gruvin said:

George Truett said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

It is over. The Democrats have "found" the votes they needed. What a travesty. We have turned into just another Banana Republic. My heart is heavy for our Democracy and Republic.
I think it's a great day for democracy and decency.

But I do think we all need to try to make our dialogue more constructive.
how sad that you cheer on democracy as it dies...

Nothing about this election says we have done our best to maintain election integretity...

We welcome constructive dialog from the left, it will be a welcome change...
I've seen no evidence.

If there's evidence of fraud, Republicans can go to court with it.

Republicans are making accusations with no evidence.
STxBear81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
i agree, if there is no evidence then dont complain. i dont want hearsay. bring it forward and lets roll
Booray
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gruvin said:

Booray said:

Gruvin said:

ARbear13 said:

LTbear said:

midgett said:

In every House race where a Republican unseated an incumbent Democrat, the Republican was either a woman, minority or ex-military or some combination.

Yeah, Trump is racist. The MSM is complicit in election tampering much more than their Russian allegations.

Those House wins have absolutely zero to do with Trump, and are a credit to those people, they campaigns they ran, and the principle they stood for. Those are great things for the Republican party. Down ballot races went incredibly well for Republicans, while it's also clear that Republicans who aren't in the Trump cult voted their displeasure with the president.


I am one of those conservative-leaning people who could not bring myself to vote for Trump but voted for many Republicans down ballot. It looks like I wasn't alone.

John Cornyn significantly outperformed Trump in Texas, and MJ Hegar was a better Democratic candidate than Biden could hope to be.
We're seeing in many cases that the Biden president vote was cast by thousands of votes more than the down ballot. they're skipping the Senate vote altogether... it only happened in battleground states
That is true in Ga and to a much lesser extent in Michigan. That is not true in Az. And in Nevada, Penn. and Wisc., there were no significant statewide races. So if by "many cases" you mean 2 states to 1, ok.
Combine that statistical anomoly with...

Arizona was always going to be a closely contested race, most likely will be in trumps favor when finished.

Nevada has over 6000 known votes cast so far that should be thrown out because they are ineligible voters a.k.a. people that don't live there anymore and things like that

In Michigan, they found over 14,000 votes from dead people already...

There have been data dumps across multiple battleground states that went 100% for Biden, statistical improbability

We are at historic levels of voting in certain states well beyond anything that's happened in the past 10 presidential election cycles, another statistical anomoly...

There are more but your opinion is made, orange man bad so of course all this is nonsense to you
Those are wild allegations that have no proof. Call me when a Court looks at actual records and supports these things.

The Nevada deal is interesting. They say that and then news reports are about one person. The Trump campaign is at the point that they are just making up stuff because a good percentage of their folks will believe anything they say.
George Truett
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gruvin said:

George Truett said:

Gruvin said:

George Truett said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Everyone knew Trump won 2016 with the slim margins yet shocking results in those rust belt states. His margins were so thin in 2016 you could see this result coming. The Democrats were probably much better organized in Wis, Mich and PA and for certain in NV.

In 2018 Pelosi and money brought the House back to the Democrats. They put that effort into 2020 Presidential race this time. The Democrats probably ignored the House races thinking the polls gave them the wave.

Biden won. Trump lost. The only dangling issue is the Senate races.

When you look at the percentage of Trump wins in the red states the biggest shock of all is the contest in GA.
GA is really big.

Stacey Abrams is part of the difference. About 6 years ago, she started "The New Georgia Project," the aim of which was to make the vote in Georgia look more like the makeup of GA.

This was a direct result of that.

Looks like Ossoff is going to lose, but Warnock may have a chance in the runoff. If Blacks vote the way they did in this election and Trump supporters stay home because Trump isn't on the ballot, Warnock could win.
yes, Stacy Abram's campaign was really big. They found a loophole in order to ballot harvest legally and Georgia was not smart enough to close at Loophole before the presidential election.
So you're saying this happened in a completely Republican-controlled state?

Right.
yes, if you will remove your head from your posterior region then you would know your statement is false. Ponder it and get back to me... or continue to beat up strawmen
So are you saying GA Republicans are incompetent and incapable of having a free and fair election?
George Truett
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Booray said:

Gruvin said:

Booray said:

Gruvin said:

ARbear13 said:

LTbear said:

midgett said:

In every House race where a Republican unseated an incumbent Democrat, the Republican was either a woman, minority or ex-military or some combination.

Yeah, Trump is racist. The MSM is complicit in election tampering much more than their Russian allegations.

Those House wins have absolutely zero to do with Trump, and are a credit to those people, they campaigns they ran, and the principle they stood for. Those are great things for the Republican party. Down ballot races went incredibly well for Republicans, while it's also clear that Republicans who aren't in the Trump cult voted their displeasure with the president.


I am one of those conservative-leaning people who could not bring myself to vote for Trump but voted for many Republicans down ballot. It looks like I wasn't alone.

John Cornyn significantly outperformed Trump in Texas, and MJ Hegar was a better Democratic candidate than Biden could hope to be.
We're seeing in many cases that the Biden president vote was cast by thousands of votes more than the down ballot. they're skipping the Senate vote altogether... it only happened in battleground states
That is true in Ga and to a much lesser extent in Michigan. That is not true in Az. And in Nevada, Penn. and Wisc., there were no significant statewide races. So if by "many cases" you mean 2 states to 1, ok.
Combine that statistical anomoly with...

Arizona was always going to be a closely contested race, most likely will be in trumps favor when finished.

Nevada has over 6000 known votes cast so far that should be thrown out because they are ineligible voters a.k.a. people that don't live there anymore and things like that

In Michigan, they found over 14,000 votes from dead people already...

There have been data dumps across multiple battleground states that went 100% for Biden, statistical improbability

We are at historic levels of voting in certain states well beyond anything that's happened in the past 10 presidential election cycles, another statistical anomoly...

There are more but your opinion is made, orange man bad so of course all this is nonsense to you
Those are wild allegations that have no proof. Call me when a Court looks at actual records and supports these things.

The Nevada deal is interesting. They say that and then news reports are about one person. The Trump campaign is at the point that they are just making up stuff because a good percentage of their folks will believe anything they say.
I haven't seen any proof of any of this either.

The fact that a record number of Republicans AND Democrats voted is somehow proof of fraud?

Really?
BaylorFTW
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Arizona has closed to a 1.4% difference. AP Press and Fox still pretending it should remain dark blue.

Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not all heroes wear black ties for 4 years...

Booray
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BaylorFTW said:

Arizona has closed to a 1.4% difference. AP Press and Fox still pretending it should remain dark blue.


The bean counters generally disagree, saying that Trump's failure to carry that last batch by the needed margin makes the likelihood of getting the rest really slim.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
George Truett said:

Gruvin said:

George Truett said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

It is over. The Democrats have "found" the votes they needed. What a travesty. We have turned into just another Banana Republic. My heart is heavy for our Democracy and Republic.
I think it's a great day for democracy and decency.

But I do think we all need to try to make our dialogue more constructive.
how sad that you cheer on democracy as it dies...

Nothing about this election says we have done our best to maintain election integretity...

We welcome constructive dialog from the left, it will be a welcome change...
I've seen no evidence.

If there's evidence of fraud, Republicans can go to court with it.

Republicans are making accusations with no evidence.
if i send you videos, will that help or you want to ignore those too?

There are vids of people erasing and rebubbling scantrons. There are videos of usps admins telling the workers to to sort and hand post mark ballots backdating them to nov 3rd...

There is video of people carrying in boxes and such near the time of the 100% ballot dump for Biden after the election center was closed.

There is witness testimony that the ballot watch officials were told the countinf was suspended for the night and sent home in GA but then they kept counting and posting overnight.

All of this is on top of the statistical anomolies.

Just because CNN didnt tell you, doesnt mean it didnt happen
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
George Truett said:

Gruvin said:

George Truett said:

Gruvin said:

George Truett said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Everyone knew Trump won 2016 with the slim margins yet shocking results in those rust belt states. His margins were so thin in 2016 you could see this result coming. The Democrats were probably much better organized in Wis, Mich and PA and for certain in NV.

In 2018 Pelosi and money brought the House back to the Democrats. They put that effort into 2020 Presidential race this time. The Democrats probably ignored the House races thinking the polls gave them the wave.

Biden won. Trump lost. The only dangling issue is the Senate races.

When you look at the percentage of Trump wins in the red states the biggest shock of all is the contest in GA.
GA is really big.

Stacey Abrams is part of the difference. About 6 years ago, she started "The New Georgia Project," the aim of which was to make the vote in Georgia look more like the makeup of GA.

This was a direct result of that.

Looks like Ossoff is going to lose, but Warnock may have a chance in the runoff. If Blacks vote the way they did in this election and Trump supporters stay home because Trump isn't on the ballot, Warnock could win.
yes, Stacy Abram's campaign was really big. They found a loophole in order to ballot harvest legally and Georgia was not smart enough to close at Loophole before the presidential election.
So you're saying this happened in a completely Republican-controlled state?

Right.
yes, if you will remove your head from your posterior region then you would know your statement is false. Ponder it and get back to me... or continue to beat up strawmen
So are you saying GA Republicans are incompetent and incapable of having a free and fair election?
sure... i refuse to continue a battle of wits with an unarmed man
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Swing state voting irregularities:

Biden outperforms Senators in swing states, underperforms in VA, NH, RI

Biden underperforms Hillary/Obama in cities, except in MI, PA, GA, WI

Biden mail-in dumps with 100% margins

GOP lose ZERO House races

Something is definitely off... get your heads out of the sand
Booray
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gruvin said:


Do you understand that the campaigns have people in each of those rooms authorized to interact with poll workers, ballot judges, etc?
Booray
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gruvin said:

Swing state voting irregularities:

Biden outperforms Senators in swing states, underperforms in VA, NH, RI

Biden underperforms Hillary/Obama in cities, except in MI, PA, GA, WI

Biden mail-in dumps with 100% margins

GOP lose ZERO House races

Something is definitely off... get your heads out of the sand
I'll play.

Tell us in which swing states Biden outperformed Dem senator candidate and by what percentage.

Same with cities vs. Hillary.

Which mail dumps are you talking about?
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Booray said:

Gruvin said:


Do you understand that the campaigns have people in each of those rooms authorized to interact with poll workers, ballot judges, etc?
I understand what supposed to happen, what do you think that person is doing in the video as part of a standard electoral/ballot review process? Repeatedly stamping blank ballots and filling in the same 6 bubbles?

She is not transcribing anything from a damaged ballot or bubbling in darker on ones that won't read, those are blank ballots being filled in.
Booray
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gruvin said:

Booray said:

Gruvin said:


Do you understand that the campaigns have people in each of those rooms authorized to interact with poll workers, ballot judges, etc?
I understand what supposed to happen, what do you think that person is doing in the video as part of a standard electoral/ballot review process? Repeatedly stamping blank ballots and filling in the same 6 bubbles?

She is not transcribing anything from a damaged ballot or bubbling in darker on ones that won't read, those are blank ballots being filled in.
I don't know. I have no earthly idea. Neither do you and like you I am curious. I assume that the GOP official who is probably 10 feet away from her would try to find out.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gruvin said:

George Truett said:

Gruvin said:

George Truett said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

It is over. The Democrats have "found" the votes they needed. What a travesty. We have turned into just another Banana Republic. My heart is heavy for our Democracy and Republic.
I think it's a great day for democracy and decency.

But I do think we all need to try to make our dialogue more constructive.
how sad that you cheer on democracy as it dies...

Nothing about this election says we have done our best to maintain election integretity...

We welcome constructive dialog from the left, it will be a welcome change...
I've seen no evidence.

If there's evidence of fraud, Republicans can go to court with it.

Republicans are making accusations with no evidence.
if i send you videos, will that help or you want to ignore those too?

There are vids of people erasing and rebubbling scantrons. There are videos of usps admins telling the workers to to sort and hand post mark ballots backdating them to nov 3rd...

There is video of people carrying in boxes and such near the time of the 100% ballot dump for Biden after the election center was closed.

There is witness testimony that the ballot watch officials were told the countinf was suspended for the night and sent home in GA but then they kept counting and posting overnight.

All of this is on top of the statistical anomolies.

Just because CNN didnt tell you, doesnt mean it didnt happen


If all of that evidence is real and can be verified, it should be an easy court case, right?

I haven't seen anyone here or elsewhere say that Trump can't or shouldn't bring whatever legitimate evidence he has to the court. But it's going to take a lot more than circumstantial and anecdotal nonsense -- often shared without context by right-wing sources -- to make your case compelling.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just doing my job as a ballot watcher...
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

Gruvin said:

George Truett said:

Gruvin said:

George Truett said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

It is over. The Democrats have "found" the votes they needed. What a travesty. We have turned into just another Banana Republic. My heart is heavy for our Democracy and Republic.
I think it's a great day for democracy and decency.

But I do think we all need to try to make our dialogue more constructive.
how sad that you cheer on democracy as it dies...

Nothing about this election says we have done our best to maintain election integretity...

We welcome constructive dialog from the left, it will be a welcome change...
I've seen no evidence.

If there's evidence of fraud, Republicans can go to court with it.

Republicans are making accusations with no evidence.
if i send you videos, will that help or you want to ignore those too?

There are vids of people erasing and rebubbling scantrons. There are videos of usps admins telling the workers to to sort and hand post mark ballots backdating them to nov 3rd...

There is video of people carrying in boxes and such near the time of the 100% ballot dump for Biden after the election center was closed.

There is witness testimony that the ballot watch officials were told the countinf was suspended for the night and sent home in GA but then they kept counting and posting overnight.

All of this is on top of the statistical anomolies.

Just because CNN didnt tell you, doesnt mean it didnt happen


If all of that evidence is real and can be verified, it should be an easy court case, right?

I haven't seen anyone here or elsewhere say that Trump can't or shouldn't bring whatever legitimate evidence he has to the court. But it's going to take a lot more than circumstantial and anecdotal nonsense -- often shared without context by right-wing sources -- to make your case compelling.
really? Because there are plenty of people all over the place that are saying that all of his claims and all of his court filings are baseless

In 2000, gore filed suit in dozens of states and it was drawn out for over 37 days. Today, you want trump to concede the race after three days and we're not even done counting votes yet...
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gruvin said:

George Truett said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

It is over. The Democrats have "found" the votes they needed. What a travesty. We have turned into just another Banana Republic. My heart is heavy for our Democracy and Republic.
I think it's a great day for democracy and decency.

But I do think we all need to try to make our dialogue more constructive.
how sad that you cheer on democracy as it dies...

Nothing about this election says we have done our best to maintain election integretity...

We welcome constructive dialog from the left, it will be a welcome change...
How did democracy die?
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gruvin said:

bear2be2 said:

Gruvin said:

George Truett said:

Gruvin said:

George Truett said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

It is over. The Democrats have "found" the votes they needed. What a travesty. We have turned into just another Banana Republic. My heart is heavy for our Democracy and Republic.
I think it's a great day for democracy and decency.

But I do think we all need to try to make our dialogue more constructive.
how sad that you cheer on democracy as it dies...

Nothing about this election says we have done our best to maintain election integretity...

We welcome constructive dialog from the left, it will be a welcome change...
I've seen no evidence.

If there's evidence of fraud, Republicans can go to court with it.

Republicans are making accusations with no evidence.
if i send you videos, will that help or you want to ignore those too?

There are vids of people erasing and rebubbling scantrons. There are videos of usps admins telling the workers to to sort and hand post mark ballots backdating them to nov 3rd...

There is video of people carrying in boxes and such near the time of the 100% ballot dump for Biden after the election center was closed.

There is witness testimony that the ballot watch officials were told the countinf was suspended for the night and sent home in GA but then they kept counting and posting overnight.

All of this is on top of the statistical anomolies.

Just because CNN didnt tell you, doesnt mean it didnt happen


If all of that evidence is real and can be verified, it should be an easy court case, right?

I haven't seen anyone here or elsewhere say that Trump can't or shouldn't bring whatever legitimate evidence he has to the court. But it's going to take a lot more than circumstantial and anecdotal nonsense -- often shared without context by right-wing sources -- to make your case compelling.
really? Because there are plenty of people all over the place that are saying that all of his claims and all of his court filings are baseless

In 2000, gore filed suit in dozens of states and it was drawn out for over 37 days. Today, you want trump to concede the race after three days and we're not even done counting votes yet...

They are baseless until he can present evidence to support them. He's hasn't done that yet. He's just thrown out allegations and made wild ass claims.
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
George Truett said:

Gruvin said:

George Truett said:

Gruvin said:

George Truett said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Everyone knew Trump won 2016 with the slim margins yet shocking results in those rust belt states. His margins were so thin in 2016 you could see this result coming. The Democrats were probably much better organized in Wis, Mich and PA and for certain in NV.

In 2018 Pelosi and money brought the House back to the Democrats. They put that effort into 2020 Presidential race this time. The Democrats probably ignored the House races thinking the polls gave them the wave.

Biden won. Trump lost. The only dangling issue is the Senate races.

When you look at the percentage of Trump wins in the red states the biggest shock of all is the contest in GA.
GA is really big.

Stacey Abrams is part of the difference. About 6 years ago, she started "The New Georgia Project," the aim of which was to make the vote in Georgia look more like the makeup of GA.

This was a direct result of that.

Looks like Ossoff is going to lose, but Warnock may have a chance in the runoff. If Blacks vote the way they did in this election and Trump supporters stay home because Trump isn't on the ballot, Warnock could win.
yes, Stacy Abram's campaign was really big. They found a loophole in order to ballot harvest legally and Georgia was not smart enough to close at Loophole before the presidential election.
So you're saying this happened in a completely Republican-controlled state?

Right.
yes, if you will remove your head from your posterior region then you would know your statement is false. Ponder it and get back to me... or continue to beat up strawmen
So are you saying GA Republicans are incompetent and incapable of having a free and fair election?
Georgia elections are managed county by county. Counties collect the ballots at precincts.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LTbear said:

Oldbear83 said:

LTbear said:

br53 said:

LTbear said:

Gruvin said:

syme said:

We're supposed to believe that Milwaukee, Detroit, and philly voters were so excited for Biden that they left the rest of the ballot completely blank.
There is a growing list of 14+ thousand dead people who voted in Wayne County (Detroit)

That is half of Bidens lead... no fraud though
If true it will be easily proven in court, so there's nothing to worry about.
But why does it always have to come to court? Do the right thing and we dont have to go to court.
Maybe the right thing has been done, and the president is lying, as he's done time and time again when he's losing (the Emmys are rigged against him, the R primaries are rigged against him, the courts are rigged against him, etc etc etc over the last 20 years). He's making an extremely important claim. And if there's a shred of evidence for it, it will be easily proven in court.
You have the shrill confidence and myopia of the fanatic.


My only confidence is in that of the system and the courts to prove what is right. I see a pattern in the personal behavior of Trump, as any honest person does. I completely see how there could be issues with ballots and 100% want those issues brought to light in court. I want a secure system that works far, far more than I want any particular politician to win office.

I'm not who you seem to think I am. My ballot included Democrats and Republicans. Montana doesn't get much play on the national media of course.
It's amazing that so many liberals can see the pattern in personal behavior of Trump but fail to recognize the behavior coming from the democratic party
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.