2020 ELECTION FRAUD THREAD

162,227 Views | 1683 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by Texasjeremy
BaylorFTW
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rich Baris said in his podcast 3 hours ago that Trump will overtake Biden in Arizona by the end of the day.

His explanation is given at the 12:45 mark

ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The strangest thing in the numbers in Georgia is that not only did the Presidential race get a lot more votes than the Senatorial race with Ossoff, but the Perdue Ossoff race got a lot more total votes than the other Senate race.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

BaylorFTW said:

LTbear said:

Gruvin said:

syme said:

We're supposed to believe that Milwaukee, Detroit, and philly voters were so excited for Biden that they left the rest of the ballot completely blank.
There is a growing list of 14+ thousand dead people who voted in Wayne County (Detroit)

That is half of Bidens lead... no fraud though
If true it will be easily proven in court, so there's nothing to worry about.
There is always something to worry about with our corrupt legal system especially when we are talking about politics. The fact is if there was nothing to worry about, we would have never come to this point in the first place. Instead, we are seeing a clear crisis of ethics and/or morality in the country.

So basically, everything is corrupt except Trump, the support for whose cause is a litmus test for morals and ethics. Do you not see how culty that sounds/is?
To be fair, that's the main reason Trump got elected in the first place.... an outsider to fight the corrupt political system that has infected every corner in almost every office of leadership in Washington DC.

If you want to call that culty.... then whatever.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

The strangest thing in the numbers in Georgia is that not only did the Presidential race get a lot more votes than the Senatorial race with Ossoff, but the Perdue Ossoff race got a lot more total votes than the other Senate race.
Is there a PAC for the Repubs for this run-off?
Any money I send will be recouped in my portfolio if Schumer isn't majority leader
Booray
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

The strangest thing in the numbers in Georgia is that not only did the Presidential race get a lot more votes than the Senatorial race with Ossoff, but the Perdue Ossoff race got a lot more total votes than the other Senate race.
I can see people not liking Loefler, but why didn't they vote for Collins?

If they had it to do over, do you think the Dems would switch their candidates so it would be Ossoff v. Loefler and Warnock v. Perdue? They need both races so it doesn't really matter, but I would much rather run against Loefler than Perdue. If you are trying to guarantee a gain of at least one, I would want my strongest candidate there.
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

ATL Bear said:

The strangest thing in the numbers in Georgia is that not only did the Presidential race get a lot more votes than the Senatorial race with Ossoff, but the Perdue Ossoff race got a lot more total votes than the other Senate race.
Is there a PAC for the Repubs for this run-off?
Any money I send will be recouped in my portfolio if Schumer isn't majority leader
Senate Leadership Fund put a lot of dollars to help Perdue because of the crazy outside money going to Ossoff. They will likely be a big money player in the upcoming runoffs. Loeffler is loaded (or her husband is) so she won't need as much help.
Booray
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

Osodecentx said:

ATL Bear said:

The strangest thing in the numbers in Georgia is that not only did the Presidential race get a lot more votes than the Senatorial race with Ossoff, but the Perdue Ossoff race got a lot more total votes than the other Senate race.
Is there a PAC for the Repubs for this run-off?
Any money I send will be recouped in my portfolio if Schumer isn't majority leader
Senate Leadership Fund put a lot of dollars to help Perdue because of the crazy outside money going to Ossoff. They will likely be a big money player in the upcoming runoffs. Loeffler is loaded (or her husband is) so she won't need as much help.
It will be an interesting test of wheter the new GOP base will turnout for Trumpism without Trump on the ticket.

Job one for the GOP insiders would be to convince Trump he can start exacting his revenge on Biden with this election to get him down there and rallying..
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Booray said:

ATL Bear said:

Osodecentx said:

ATL Bear said:

The strangest thing in the numbers in Georgia is that not only did the Presidential race get a lot more votes than the Senatorial race with Ossoff, but the Perdue Ossoff race got a lot more total votes than the other Senate race.
Is there a PAC for the Repubs for this run-off?
Any money I send will be recouped in my portfolio if Schumer isn't majority leader
Senate Leadership Fund put a lot of dollars to help Perdue because of the crazy outside money going to Ossoff. They will likely be a big money player in the upcoming runoffs. Loeffler is loaded (or her husband is) so she won't need as much help.
It will be an interesting test of wheter the new GOP base will turnout for Trumpism without Trump on the ticket.

Job one for the GOP insiders would be to convince Trump he can start exacting his revenge on Biden with this election to get him down there and rallying..
What the Left does not understand about Trump, is that most of his support is not about personality, it's about his priorities and the results. The GOP lost in 2018 because they deserted Trump and lost his support.

To win in runoffs, the GOP needs to sell Trump's mission to voters. Nothing else will lead to a win.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Booray said:

ATL Bear said:

The strangest thing in the numbers in Georgia is that not only did the Presidential race get a lot more votes than the Senatorial race with Ossoff, but the Perdue Ossoff race got a lot more total votes than the other Senate race.
I can see people not liking Loefler, but why didn't they vote for Collins?

If they had it to do over, do you think the Dems would switch their candidates so it would be Ossoff v. Loefler and Warnock v. Perdue? They need both races so it doesn't really matter, but I would much rather run against Loefler than Perdue. If you are trying to guarantee a gain of at least one, I would want my strongest candidate there.
Interesting thought. I am a friend of Doug Collins so I helped his campaign and I wanted him to win. However, and I wouldn't say this to him, but the blessing in disguise with Loeffler and a runoff is that she has the bucks for the battle, and Warnock will rely on Liberal/Democrat PACS which will be split in the races. Her ability to spend on TV ads and put some crazy stuff out there was a difference maker.

But to answer your question, I think the Democrats believed Ossoff could beat Perdue outright (50%) and avoid a runoff and at least have that seat. The open race was guaranteed to be a runoff. There was actually a scenario and belief that Loeffler and Collins could be the runoff candidates.

I don't know how vehement the support will be for Senate control given Biden as President and the House still blue, especially with BOTH races likely to need to be won just for 50-50.
br53
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Booray said:

ATL Bear said:

The strangest thing in the numbers in Georgia is that not only did the Presidential race get a lot more votes than the Senatorial race with Ossoff, but the Perdue Ossoff race got a lot more total votes than the other Senate race.
I can see people not liking Loefler, but why didn't they vote for Collins?

If they had it to do over, do you think the Dems would switch their candidates so it would be Ossoff v. Loefler and Warnock v. Perdue? They need both races so it doesn't really matter, but I would much rather run against Loefler than Perdue. If you are trying to guarantee a gain of at least one, I would want my strongest candidate there.
we shall see.
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
br53 said:

Booray said:

ATL Bear said:

The strangest thing in the numbers in Georgia is that not only did the Presidential race get a lot more votes than the Senatorial race with Ossoff, but the Perdue Ossoff race got a lot more total votes than the other Senate race.
I can see people not liking Loefler, but why didn't they vote for Collins?

If they had it to do over, do you think the Dems would switch their candidates so it would be Ossoff v. Loefler and Warnock v. Perdue? They need both races so it doesn't really matter, but I would much rather run against Loefler than Perdue. If you are trying to guarantee a gain of at least one, I would want my strongest candidate there.
we shall see.
NVM saw your edit.
PartyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hugh Hewitt of all people was just interviewed on NBC. He is an ardent Trumper. He was essentially publicly having the talk y'all have talked about through his TV appearance. He was talking in terms of Trump should stop fighting and try to live to run again in 24 and give a speech somewhat like Nixon's speech. That said I would be surprised if there is enough sycophantism left in the GOP in 4 years that he would easily glide to being nominated again. Surely there are other Republicans who want to have a turn at being the nominee for POTUS. But I could be wrong about all that. He may not take this type of advice anyway and try to burn it all down anyway.
BaylorFTW
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Baris also says at the 15:54 mark that he believes Georgia will flip back to Trump based on the military votes. Regardless, he thinks there will be a recount if not more.

Texasjeremy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gruvin said:

The population of Michigan increased from 9.9 million in 2015 to 10.0 million in 2016, and it's still at 10.045 million.

700k more votes than 2016? Nah...

VOTING INCREASE FROM 2016 TO 2020, SO FAR

+33.8% - Hawaii (+144,917) ----- 96%
+25.6% - Idaho (+176,971) ----- 99%
+25.2% - Texas (+2,261,319) ----- 85%
+21.4% - Arizona (+550,060) ----- 90%
+21.4% - Tennessee (+537,455) ----- 97%
+20.8% - Montana (+103,533) ----- 99%
+20.5% - Georgia (+845,473) ----- 99%
+19.0% - South Carolina (+398,543) ----- 94%
+17.2% - Florida (+1,623,262) ----- 99%
+16.0% - Vermont (+50,376) ----- 92%
+15.0% - North Carolina (+712,324) ----- 94%
+15.0% - Michigan (+720,064) ----- 99%
+14.9% - New Mexico (+118,836) ----- 99%
+14.2% - South Dakota (+52,480) ----- 94%
+14.0% - Oregon (+280,438) ----- 91%
+13.2% - Delaware (+58,530) ----- 99%
+13.0% - Washington (+432,512) ----- 85%
+12.8% - Colorado (+355,604) ----- 92%
+12.1% - Kansas (+143,209) ----- 99%
+12.0% - Nevada (+135,415) ----- 87%
+11.0% - Minnesota (+323,575) ----- 99%
+10.5% - Wisconsin (+313,322) ----- 99%
+10.0% - Indiana (+273,458) ----- 99%
+9.9% - West Virginia (+70,698) ----- 99%
+9.6% - Nebraska (+81,364) ----- 99%
+9.3% - Kentucky (+178,121) ----- 98%
+8.8% - Virginia (+349,353) ----- 99%
+8.7% - Maine (+65,057) ----- 99%
+8.4% - Pennsylvania (+518,858) ----- 98%
+7.8% - Rhode Island (+36,246) ----- 94%
+7.8% - Alabama (+166,652) ----- 99%
+7.7% - New Hampshire (+57,228) ----- 99%
+7.6% - Connecticut (+125,527) ----- 99%
+7.5% - Iowa (+117,354) ----- 99%
+7.4% - Wyoming (+19,023) ----- 97%
+7.3% - Oklahoma (+105,635) ----- 99%
+7.1% - Missouri (+199,139) ----- 99%
+6.8% - Arkansas (+77,301) ----- 99%
+6.1% - Massachusetts (+203,986) ----- 99%
+5.8% - Louisiana (+118,281) ----- 95%
+4.8% - Ohio (+264,763) ----- 96%
+4.2% - North Dakota (+14,312) ----- 99%
+3.3% - Utah (+37,442) ----- 83%
-2.6% - Illinois (-145,077) ----- 91%
-6.3% - Mississippi (-75,818) ----- 84%
-7.5% - District of Columbia (-23,492) ----- 83%
-10.3% - California (-1,456,682) ----- 60%
-14.0% - New Jersey (-544,241) ----- 74%
-14.1% - New York (-1,089,286) ----- 78%
-17.7% - Maryland (-491,642) ----- 76%
-40.1% - Alaska (-127,638) ---- 50%
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hewitt is not an 'ardent Trumper'.

He's been lukewarm, at best.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
BaylorFTW
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another pollster now claiming Trump will take Arizona

BaylorFTW
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Baris also says at the 17:50 mark that Dems will have much more difficulty "adding ballots" in North Carolina like they have done in Georgia and Pennsylvania because of outstanding red votes and military votes. So North Carolina should go Trump as well.

Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So maybe it all comes back to Pennsylvania.

Hmm.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
UH Oh!!!

Texasjeremy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
VOTOR TURNOUT BY PARTY (2016 to 2020 Differential) - SO FAR

ARIZONA (90% in)
+34.4% - Dem (+399,980)
+21.2% - Rep (+264,967)

GEORGIA (99% in)
+30.5% - Dem (+572,231)
+17.2% - Rep (+359,533)

MICHIGAN (99% in)
+23.0% - Dem (+521,809)
+16.0% - Rep (+364,985)

PENNSYLVANIA (98% in)
+13.1% - Dem (+384,337)
+11.0% - Rep (+326,721)

WISCONSIN (99% in)
+17.9% - Dem (+248,032)
+14.6% - Rep (+204,749)

midgett
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Texasjeremy said:

VOTOR TURNOUT BY PARTY (2016 to 2020 Differential) - SO FAR

ARIZONA (90% in)
+34.4% - Dem (+399,980)
+21.2% - Rep (+264,967)

GEORGIA (99% in)
+30.5% - Dem (+572,231)
+17.2% - Rep (+359,533)

MICHIGAN (99% in)
+23.0% - Dem (+521,809)
+16.0% - Rep (+364,985)

PENNSYLVANIA (98% in)
+13.1% - Dem (+384,337)
+11.0% - Rep (+326,721)

WISCONSIN (99% in)
+17.9% - Dem (+248,032)
+14.6% - Rep (+204,749)


Do the other battlegrounds and even other states if it isn't too much trouble.

If Dems only won by the same amount overall, it seems fishy that they way outperformed in states needing an inexplicable amount of time to tally votes.
rudylaw
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

UH Oh!!!


https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/11/4/21549710/biden-michigan-votes-trump-retweet-election-map

Aw, shucks. Funny how none of the same processes meant anything in 2016. Joe is way up in Michigan; it's over there.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/nov/04/tweets/no-biden-did-not-receive-thousands-mysteriously-su/
Aliceinbubbleland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rudylaw said:

Doc Holliday said:

UH Oh!!!


https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/11/4/21549710/biden-michigan-votes-trump-retweet-election-map

Aw, shucks. Funny how none of the same processes meant anything in 2016. Joe is way up in Michigan; it's over there.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear said:

George Truett said:

Gruvin said:

George Truett said:

Gruvin said:

George Truett said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Everyone knew Trump won 2016 with the slim margins yet shocking results in those rust belt states. His margins were so thin in 2016 you could see this result coming. The Democrats were probably much better organized in Wis, Mich and PA and for certain in NV.

In 2018 Pelosi and money brought the House back to the Democrats. They put that effort into 2020 Presidential race this time. The Democrats probably ignored the House races thinking the polls gave them the wave.

Biden won. Trump lost. The only dangling issue is the Senate races.

When you look at the percentage of Trump wins in the red states the biggest shock of all is the contest in GA.
GA is really big.

Stacey Abrams is part of the difference. About 6 years ago, she started "The New Georgia Project," the aim of which was to make the vote in Georgia look more like the makeup of GA.

This was a direct result of that.

Looks like Ossoff is going to lose, but Warnock may have a chance in the runoff. If Blacks vote the way they did in this election and Trump supporters stay home because Trump isn't on the ballot, Warnock could win.
yes, Stacy Abram's campaign was really big. They found a loophole in order to ballot harvest legally and Georgia was not smart enough to close at Loophole before the presidential election.
So you're saying this happened in a completely Republican-controlled state?

Right.
yes, if you will remove your head from your posterior region then you would know your statement is false. Ponder it and get back to me... or continue to beat up strawmen
So are you saying GA Republicans are incompetent and incapable of having a free and fair election?
Georgia elections are managed county by county. Counties collect the ballots at precincts.
dont help him... he will never learn thst way
br53
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Texasjeremy said:

VOTOR TURNOUT BY PARTY (2016 to 2020 Differential) - SO FAR

ARIZONA (90% in)
+34.4% - Dem (+399,980)
+21.2% - Rep (+264,967)

GEORGIA (99% in)
+30.5% - Dem (+572,231)
+17.2% - Rep (+359,533)

MICHIGAN (99% in)
+23.0% - Dem (+521,809)
+16.0% - Rep (+364,985)

PENNSYLVANIA (98% in)
+13.1% - Dem (+384,337)
+11.0% - Rep (+326,721)

WISCONSIN (99% in)
+17.9% - Dem (+248,032)
+14.6% - Rep (+204,749)


VOTER
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Show me the (more) money!


Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

Show me the (more) money!



I think I'll play in Georgia. Hard to believe Lincoln Project wants a Schumer majority leader.
trey3216
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Shippou said:

trey3216 said:

Gruvin said:

trey3216 said:

Shippou said:

Doc Holliday said:

Shippou said:

BornAgain said:

more like expect President Xi
President Xi, please liberate America.
Yes comrade
We can dream.
You dream about putting people in slave camps because of their religion? How woke of you
The largest vote share of Biden supporters were nonreligious
I was talking about Shippou's hope for a President Xi style government.
That was a joke.
I know. And I joke-jabbed back
Mr. Treehorn treats objects like women, man.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, here come the accusations...let's investigate.





BaylorFTW
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

So maybe it all comes back to Pennsylvania.

Hmm.
And Nevada. And depending on what is found, Wisky and Michigan maybe too.
BaylorFTW
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As predicted, Georgia will have at least a recount. https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/11/06/georgia-secretary-of-state-results-too-close-to-call-there-will-be-a-recount/
Forest Bueller_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fubar said:

Jack Bauer said:

fubar said:

Jack Bauer said:

GA:

47k votes left
9k vote lead for Trump

Biden needs appx 60% of those votes to win.

In Chatham with 87% reporting, Biden leads 57.7 to 40 percent.

Floyd county is also still counting and has reported 89% of the vote. Floyd county is currently running 70.4% for Trump to 28.4% for Biden. But it's a smaller county so the outstanding vote is probably only around 4,000 votes.
It's down to under 4000 now. Don't know how many still to count.
https://results.decisiondeskhq.com/2020/general/georgia

All but 2 blue counties say 99% or more and those 2 are smaller.

Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger said on Thursday that as of 5:35 p.m. local time approximately 36,331 ballots are still outstanding.
Then Georgia gonna go Biden. Pennsylvania will as well before the night is over.

Time for the GOP to regroup while Trump whines. The party did a lot better than I expected, so it's starting from a good place. The sooner it starts ignoring Trump the better.
This is true, there are several really good candidates for 2024 the GOP needs to decide what direction they are going. Trump in the long run will be a footnote in history. However, he appointed 3 SC Justices, that will be his legacy.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rawhide said:

bear2be2 said:

BaylorFTW said:

LTbear said:

Gruvin said:

syme said:

We're supposed to believe that Milwaukee, Detroit, and philly voters were so excited for Biden that they left the rest of the ballot completely blank.
There is a growing list of 14+ thousand dead people who voted in Wayne County (Detroit)

That is half of Bidens lead... no fraud though
If true it will be easily proven in court, so there's nothing to worry about.
There is always something to worry about with our corrupt legal system especially when we are talking about politics. The fact is if there was nothing to worry about, we would have never come to this point in the first place. Instead, we are seeing a clear crisis of ethics and/or morality in the country.

So basically, everything is corrupt except Trump, the support for whose cause is a litmus test for morals and ethics. Do you not see how culty that sounds/is?
To be fair, that's the main reason Trump got elected in the first place.... an outsider to fight the corrupt political system that has infected every corner in almost every office of leadership in Washington DC.

If you want to call that culty.... then whatever.
It's one thing to fall for that initially. It's quite another to still be spouting that nonsense after four years of incompetence and conflicts of interest.
Forest Bueller_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

Well, here come the accusations...let's investigate.






Ballot harvesting is real, and in very close races can determine the outcome. It really isn't that difficult. Flood a specific area with a bunch of unsolicited ballots, send out canvassers to collect ballots. If the person says they aren't interested in voting, but you have their personal information, you have a ready made ballot ready to be filled in. Get rid of the signature matching requirement and it's an easy proposition. Throw in the coronavirus, and nobody blinks an eye about an incredible number of mail in ballots.



Quote:

Before 2018, Dowless worked as an operative on get out the vote efforts for several local races in Braden County. But two years ago he was accused of paying workers to collect absentee ballots from voters, to fraudulently sign them and then deliver them to election offices. Ballot collection by third parties is illegal in North Carolina. But several states allow operatives like Dowless, as well as campaign volunteers and other third party advocates to collect completed, authenticated ballots.

In states where the practice is legal, volunteers or campaign workers can go directly to the homes of voters, collect the completed ballots, and drop them off en masse at polling places or election offices. In some states, ballot harvesters can be paid hourly for their work collecting ballots.

Critics fear that in states without restrictions on who can return a ballot on someone else's behalf, a third party could take advantage of the system by tampering with or discarding the ballots.


The above was from a CBS article. Note that when authentication is removed from the equation, all kinds of shenanigans can ensue. I'm pretty sure we saw a lot of it this year, and there is absolutely nothing you can do about it. Without signature matching requirement, and other requirements, true believers will do whatever is necessary, and there is absolutely no way to prove it once the counting is done.
STxBear81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is this fake news ?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.