I disagreePartyBear said:
I think Barr may be facing obstruction of justice charges in the spring unless he gets his pardon before noon Jan 20th. Barr is not a good example at all for demonstrating what an AG can do.
What obstruction of justice?
I disagreePartyBear said:
I think Barr may be facing obstruction of justice charges in the spring unless he gets his pardon before noon Jan 20th. Barr is not a good example at all for demonstrating what an AG can do.
TexasScientist said:You probably should go back to target practice where you're more accurate.wuzzybear said:Silly boy, you need to fix your typos, because Trump should be replaced by Joe Biden in your statement. Did you graduate at the top of your Marx College Class. No doubt you are a 1 percenter.TexasScientist said:Yep, for being Donald Trump. For federal charges of bank fraud, money laundering, RICO act violations etc.RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:Pardon him for what? Being Donald Trump?TexasScientist said:
Prediction: Trump will resign, Pence will pardon him
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/525845-prediction-trump-will-resign-pence-will-pardon-him
I think he has to, if he is smart. What do you think?
Democrats think everyone done they don't like "warrants investigation".HuMcK said:
Pretty clear Barr stepped in to interfere with prosecutions of Roger Stone and Mike Flynn. It might not add up to obstruction, but it warrants investigation.
Well, we really disagree.HuMcK said:
Pretty clear Barr stepped in to interfere with prosecutions of Roger Stone and Mike Flynn. It might not add up to obstruction, but it warrants investigation.
What specifically did Barr do that amounts to obstruction of justice?HuMcK said:
I'm curious to hear why. Lead prosecutors resigned on both of those cases because someone interfered with them doing their jobs, most likely candidate is Barr. I think at a minimum some investigator will want to hear what those prosecutors have to say.
Maybe you can get Rudy and Powell to represent you in these claims. They have experience in these sorts of things.HuMcK said:
I didn't say he did, I said it warrants investigation. Influencing criminal cases of the President's associates, who potentially could provide adverse testimony that would expose the President to legal liability (i.e. a "corrupt purpose", 1 major element of the obstruction statute), could rise to that level although that is a very long shot.
Again, the lead prosecutors in those cases both resigned for a reason, once Barr is no longer their boss they might be interested in discussing their thoughts about it.
In that case, this is so stupid it should make your head spin. Barr runs the Justice Department, which was not providing exculpatory information (as is required) in the Flynn case. Try to keep up, Aggie.HuMcK said:
I didn't say he did, I said it warrants investigation. Influencing criminal cases of the President's associates, who potentially could provide adverse testimony that would expose the President to legal liability (i.e. a "corrupt purpose", 1 major element of the obstruction statute), could rise to that level although that is a very long shot.
Again, the lead prosecutors in those cases both resigned for a reason, once Barr is no longer their boss they might be interested in discussing their thoughts about it.
She seems perfect for youHuMcK said:
Funny you should mention Powell, she is the current defense counsel for Flynn in his case, using the same strategy of throwing out wild conspiracies in public but getting slapped by the Judge in court. If not for Barr intervening to force DoJ into trying to dismiss the case (which the Judge is rightfully calling out as absurdly obvious corruption), prompting the resignation of the lead prosecutor in protest, Flynn would be a convicted felon and in jail right now.
But hey, maybe Powell and Barr are playing it straighter in the Flynn case than they are with the election stuff...or maybe these people are a pack of charlatans and thieves and all they know how to do is be shady. Who knows, "both sides" and all that.
You're talking about obstruction, so you need people who will go where nobody has gone before.HuMcK said:
Lol you voted for these people, not me.
Your side voted in AOC, Schiff, Pelosi et al. That's not something a reasonable person would celebrate as good.HuMcK said:
Lol you voted for these people, not me.
No. I dropped out from Rotan High School. I just come on the Baylor Board for fun.HuMcK said:
Got my Baylor degree in 2010, do you have one?
Didn't you play Crockett in 2010?Carlos Safety said:No. I dropped out from Rotan High School. I just come on the Baylor Board for fun.HuMcK said:
Got my Baylor degree in 2010, do you have one?
Osodecentx said:Didn't you play Crockett in 2010?Carlos Safety said:No. I dropped out from Rotan High School. I just come on the Baylor Board for fun.HuMcK said:
Got my Baylor degree in 2010, do you have one?
Ok...now that is funny. I spend a lot of time between Rotan and Jayton!!!!!!!Carlos Safety said:No. I dropped out from Rotan High School. I just come on the Baylor Board for fun.HuMcK said:
Got my Baylor degree in 2010, do you have one?
J.R. said:Ok...now that is funny. I spend a lot of time between Rotan and Jayton!!!!!!!Carlos Safety said:No. I dropped out from Rotan High School. I just come on the Baylor Board for fun.HuMcK said:
Got my Baylor degree in 2010, do you have one?
HuMcK said:
Maybe next time don't sell your entire souls to such an unrepentant criminal and you won't have to worry about such things. Especially now, with Trump spreading conspiracies and deliberately undermining the foundations of our Republic to save his own skin, the only (narrow) path to reconciliation involves accountability for Trump.
Or what are you going to do?HuMcK said:HuMcK said:
Maybe next time don't sell your entire souls to such an unrepentant criminal and you won't have to worry about such things. Especially now, with Trump spreading conspiracies and deliberately undermining the foundations of our Republic to save his own skin, the only (narrow) path to reconciliation involves accountability for Trump.
Just gonna bump now for no reason at all.
LOL. For another non-prosecutable act.HuMcK said:
Pray fervently for swift justice
I've reported him in detail to the mods. All they say is they will look into it. I think the guy is unhinged, and may be the type to make the evening news. He and his militia may be planning to meet in DC for the big event.BaylorBJM said:
Have the mods checked on Wuzzy? After posting 50+ posts per day for weeks on end he's been inactive for nearly a month.
I think the chances are greater than not he is/was a bot, but he he posted in a manner and made some veiled comments which I think warrant at least a check-in given recent event in Nashville and others.
And yes, I'm being 100% serious.
First, my comments come from the right of center, as opposed to the radical extreme right. You need to pay more attention to direction. Second, if your premise were true, I would have tried to ban your comments long ago. Wuzzy's comments suggest he is unstable and may do something irrational or worse. But your concern raises the question. Are you in the militia?Oldbear83 said:
There's the 'tolerant' Left. Find someone with an opinion you dislike, and do whatever you can to ban them.
Pretty weak excuses TS, especially since you have never understood 'right of center' in any meaningful way as evidenced by your posts.TexasScientist said:First, my comments come from the right of center, as opposed to the radical extreme right. You need to pay more attention to direction. Second, if your premise were true, I would have tried to ban your comments long ago. Wuzzy's comments suggest he is unstable and may do something irrational or worse. But your concern raises the question. Are you in the militia?Oldbear83 said:
There's the 'tolerant' Left. Find someone with an opinion you dislike, and do whatever you can to ban them.
So says the king of cheap shots (review your own prolific posts). My politics are fair and objective, and from the right. I don't buy into the conspiracy theories, Q theories and disinformation from the fringe right. That doesn't mean my politics are from the left. The right needs to clean itself up. Getting rid of Trump, who is not a conservative, is a good step in the right direction. I challenge you to back up your claim that I have a "hard-left bias politically."Oldbear83 said:Pretty weak excuses TS, especially since you have never understood 'right of center' in any meaningful way as evidenced by your posts.TexasScientist said:First, my comments come from the right of center, as opposed to the radical extreme right. You need to pay more attention to direction. Second, if your premise were true, I would have tried to ban your comments long ago. Wuzzy's comments suggest he is unstable and may do something irrational or worse. But your concern raises the question. Are you in the militia?Oldbear83 said:
There's the 'tolerant' Left. Find someone with an opinion you dislike, and do whatever you can to ban them.
You have a hard-left bias politically, which is fine but it makes you laughably absurd when you virtue signal anyone who really is center-right.
It's especially funny how you pretend to be civil but can't resist cheap shots as evidenced by your last question. Just admit you can be just as petty as anyone else here, and you will gain more credibility.