Has the Clock Started?

11,107 Views | 178 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by 9b1deb4d-3b7d-4bad-9bdd-2
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

A few articles of interest

'Murder rates go UP dramatically after BLM protests, study finds'

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/murder-rates-go-up-dramatically-after-blm-protests-study-finds/ar-BB1fWwzt

"many of the people putting BLM signs on their front lawns and blacking out their social media profiles are unaware of the extent of BLM fanaticism"

https://www.stanforddaily.com/2020/11/15/the-case-against-blm/


"report reveals nearly 570 violent demonstrations--riots--in nearly 220 locations spread all across country."

https://acleddata.com/acleddatanew/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/ACLED_USDataReview_Sum2020_SeptWebPDF.pdf

'The Black Lives Matter Movement Must Solve Its Violence Problem'

https://nationalinterest.org/feature/black-lives-matter-movement-must-solve-its-violence-problem-163732


You're dodging the issue.
No, very much the opposite. Your darling cause celebre is a gang of violent thugs.

People who want equality are violent thugs? OK bud. Where is that evidence that less than 95% of BLM protests over last summer were peaceful?
BLM was never about equality.

They are marxists

https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-co-founder-describes-herself-as-trained-marxist/

They use donations for their personal gain

https://nypost.com/2021/04/10/inside-blm-co-founder-patrisse-khan-cullors-real-estate-buying-binge/

They use violence to destabilize the nation

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/08/31/riots-violence-erupting-turning-many-away-blm-and-protests-column/5675343002/

https://www.politicsweb.co.za/politics/blm-use-of-violence-can-be-rational--nmf

https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/07/black-lives-matter-hypocrisy-cheering-violence/


There is a reason most Americans no longer trust or support BLM. The name was always a lie, promoting something very different from their real aims and objectives.


You've fallen for the right wing narrative. There are plenty of bad actors who try to take over good movements for personal gain, but that does not affect the movement itself.

There were people like you who criticized the civil rights movement after Dr King was assassinated. There were bad actors who tried to monetize it, and it gave people like you an excuse to dismiss the entire movement.

"See, Dr King just wanted to get rich! It was never about civil rights!" - oldbear in 1968
Claiming I or my family did or would have opposed civil rights is complete BS and I resent the cheap shot.

It's fine that you like BLM, but that last post was just slimy, Porteroso.

Show me one time - ever - that I posted a racist comment here on SicEm365, or apologize for that slander.

My guess is you will just slink away and pretend you didn't say it.

I'm drawing comparisons to like situations. It's not rocket science. If you are against a movement named "black lives matter" in 2021, because some bad actors tried to monetize it, I can't imagine you supported the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s.

And don't pretend you actually want a response. You ignore the points I make in favor of straw man arguments.


As expected, Porteroso, you prove yourself a coward and a boor. Nothing better than sewer waste with a keyboard.

There seems to be a lot that old people just can't deal with. Puts nursing homes in a new light for me.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

A few articles of interest

'Murder rates go UP dramatically after BLM protests, study finds'

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/murder-rates-go-up-dramatically-after-blm-protests-study-finds/ar-BB1fWwzt

"many of the people putting BLM signs on their front lawns and blacking out their social media profiles are unaware of the extent of BLM fanaticism"

https://www.stanforddaily.com/2020/11/15/the-case-against-blm/


"report reveals nearly 570 violent demonstrations--riots--in nearly 220 locations spread all across country."

https://acleddata.com/acleddatanew/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/ACLED_USDataReview_Sum2020_SeptWebPDF.pdf

'The Black Lives Matter Movement Must Solve Its Violence Problem'

https://nationalinterest.org/feature/black-lives-matter-movement-must-solve-its-violence-problem-163732


You're dodging the issue.
No, very much the opposite. Your darling cause celebre is a gang of violent thugs.

People who want equality are violent thugs? OK bud. Where is that evidence that less than 95% of BLM protests over last summer were peaceful?
BLM was never about equality.

They are marxists

https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-co-founder-describes-herself-as-trained-marxist/

They use donations for their personal gain

https://nypost.com/2021/04/10/inside-blm-co-founder-patrisse-khan-cullors-real-estate-buying-binge/

They use violence to destabilize the nation

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/08/31/riots-violence-erupting-turning-many-away-blm-and-protests-column/5675343002/

https://www.politicsweb.co.za/politics/blm-use-of-violence-can-be-rational--nmf

https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/07/black-lives-matter-hypocrisy-cheering-violence/


There is a reason most Americans no longer trust or support BLM. The name was always a lie, promoting something very different from their real aims and objectives.


You've fallen for the right wing narrative. There are plenty of bad actors who try to take over good movements for personal gain, but that does not affect the movement itself.

There were people like you who criticized the civil rights movement after Dr King was assassinated. There were bad actors who tried to monetize it, and it gave people like you an excuse to dismiss the entire movement.

"See, Dr King just wanted to get rich! It was never about civil rights!" - oldbear in 1968
Claiming I or my family did or would have opposed civil rights is complete BS and I resent the cheap shot.

It's fine that you like BLM, but that last post was just slimy, Porteroso.

Show me one time - ever - that I posted a racist comment here on SicEm365, or apologize for that slander.

My guess is you will just slink away and pretend you didn't say it.

I'm drawing comparisons to like situations. It's not rocket science. If you are against a movement named "black lives matter" in 2021, because some bad actors tried to monetize it, I can't imagine you supported the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s.

And don't pretend you actually want a response. You ignore the points I make in favor of straw man arguments.


As expected, Porteroso, you prove yourself a coward and a boor. Nothing better than sewer waste with a keyboard.

There seems to be a lot that old people just can't deal with. Puts nursing homes in a new light for me.



It's sad, really, that Porteroso can do no better than false claims and malicious character.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

A few articles of interest

'Murder rates go UP dramatically after BLM protests, study finds'

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/murder-rates-go-up-dramatically-after-blm-protests-study-finds/ar-BB1fWwzt

"many of the people putting BLM signs on their front lawns and blacking out their social media profiles are unaware of the extent of BLM fanaticism"

https://www.stanforddaily.com/2020/11/15/the-case-against-blm/


"report reveals nearly 570 violent demonstrations--riots--in nearly 220 locations spread all across country."

https://acleddata.com/acleddatanew/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/ACLED_USDataReview_Sum2020_SeptWebPDF.pdf

'The Black Lives Matter Movement Must Solve Its Violence Problem'

https://nationalinterest.org/feature/black-lives-matter-movement-must-solve-its-violence-problem-163732


You're dodging the issue.
No, very much the opposite. Your darling cause celebre is a gang of violent thugs.

People who want equality are violent thugs? OK bud. Where is that evidence that less than 95% of BLM protests over last summer were peaceful?
BLM was never about equality.

They are marxists

https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-co-founder-describes-herself-as-trained-marxist/

They use donations for their personal gain

https://nypost.com/2021/04/10/inside-blm-co-founder-patrisse-khan-cullors-real-estate-buying-binge/

They use violence to destabilize the nation

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/08/31/riots-violence-erupting-turning-many-away-blm-and-protests-column/5675343002/

https://www.politicsweb.co.za/politics/blm-use-of-violence-can-be-rational--nmf

https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/07/black-lives-matter-hypocrisy-cheering-violence/


There is a reason most Americans no longer trust or support BLM. The name was always a lie, promoting something very different from their real aims and objectives.


You've fallen for the right wing narrative. There are plenty of bad actors who try to take over good movements for personal gain, but that does not affect the movement itself.

There were people like you who criticized the civil rights movement after Dr King was assassinated. There were bad actors who tried to monetize it, and it gave people like you an excuse to dismiss the entire movement.

"See, Dr King just wanted to get rich! It was never about civil rights!" - oldbear in 1968
Claiming I or my family did or would have opposed civil rights is complete BS and I resent the cheap shot.

It's fine that you like BLM, but that last post was just slimy, Porteroso.

Show me one time - ever - that I posted a racist comment here on SicEm365, or apologize for that slander.

My guess is you will just slink away and pretend you didn't say it.

I'm drawing comparisons to like situations. It's not rocket science. If you are against a movement named "black lives matter" in 2021, because some bad actors tried to monetize it, I can't imagine you supported the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s.

And don't pretend you actually want a response. You ignore the points I make in favor of straw man arguments.


As expected, Porteroso, you prove yourself a coward and a boor. Nothing better than sewer waste with a keyboard.

There seems to be a lot that old people just can't deal with. Puts nursing homes in a new light for me.



It's sad, really, that Porteroso can do no better than false claims and malicious character.

I'm not the one attacking "black lives matter" with "they're all thugs and criminals." The mental gymnastics are insane.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I linked to supporting evidence, while you have nothing but an stale fake 'race' card.

And no one here ever went after MLK's vision of judging people by their character, although you came close by linking 'kill the cops' BLM and their building burnings with him, as if any sane person would see them as the same.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

I linked to supporting evidence, while you have nothing but an stale fake 'race' card.

And no one here ever went after MLK's vision of judging people by their character, although you came close by linking 'kill the cops' BLM and their building burnings with him, as if any sane person would see them as the same.
These are the top 6 google results for peaceful BLM protests over the summer.

Time.com
Washington Post
sacbee (what is that)
acle data
The Guardian
The Hill

Anything else, reality denier? 93-95% of the summer BLM protests were entirely peaceful. If your argument is that 5-7% were violent, because you can find links on violent BLM riots... you are only proving my point.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You are late with weak efforts. Stop supporting hate, Porteroso.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

You are late with weak efforts. Stop supporting hate, Porteroso.
I'm not actually thinking you care about truth or facts, I'm posting this because other people read the forum, and aren't all so obtuse as you.

It does matter, if you're lying. It may not matter to you, in fact I have evidence it does not. Evidence of your lies may come entire days after your lie, but it's never too late for the truth! Truth seeker Porter over here, defending the world against old bears and their lies.
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

You are late with weak efforts. Stop supporting hate, Porteroso.
I'm not actually thinking you care about truth or facts, I'm posting this because other people read the forum, and aren't all so obtuse as you.

It does matter, if you're lying. It may not matter to you, in fact I have evidence it does not. Evidence of your lies may come entire days after your lie, but it's never too late for the truth! Truth seeker Porter over here, defending the world against old bears and their lies.
BLM is the current Progressive version of the KKK. The fact that you defend and align with them and Antifa tells us all we need to know about you.
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anyone who reads your posts, Porteroso, knows you sell race hate and support for mob violence.

You won't sway any mature minds.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

A few articles of interest

'Murder rates go UP dramatically after BLM protests, study finds'

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/murder-rates-go-up-dramatically-after-blm-protests-study-finds/ar-BB1fWwzt

"many of the people putting BLM signs on their front lawns and blacking out their social media profiles are unaware of the extent of BLM fanaticism"

https://www.stanforddaily.com/2020/11/15/the-case-against-blm/


"report reveals nearly 570 violent demonstrations--riots--in nearly 220 locations spread all across country."

https://acleddata.com/acleddatanew/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/ACLED_USDataReview_Sum2020_SeptWebPDF.pdf

'The Black Lives Matter Movement Must Solve Its Violence Problem'

https://nationalinterest.org/feature/black-lives-matter-movement-must-solve-its-violence-problem-163732


You're dodging the issue.
No, very much the opposite. Your darling cause celebre is a gang of violent thugs.

People who want equality are violent thugs? OK bud. Where is that evidence that less than 95% of BLM protests over last summer were peaceful?
BLM was never about equality.

They are marxists

https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-co-founder-describes-herself-as-trained-marxist/

They use donations for their personal gain

https://nypost.com/2021/04/10/inside-blm-co-founder-patrisse-khan-cullors-real-estate-buying-binge/

They use violence to destabilize the nation

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/08/31/riots-violence-erupting-turning-many-away-blm-and-protests-column/5675343002/

https://www.politicsweb.co.za/politics/blm-use-of-violence-can-be-rational--nmf

https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/07/black-lives-matter-hypocrisy-cheering-violence/


There is a reason most Americans no longer trust or support BLM. The name was always a lie, promoting something very different from their real aims and objectives.


You've fallen for the right wing narrative. There are plenty of bad actors who try to take over good movements for personal gain, but that does not affect the movement itself.

There were people like you who criticized the civil rights movement after Dr King was assassinated. There were bad actors who tried to monetize it, and it gave people like you an excuse to dismiss the entire movement.

"See, Dr King just wanted to get rich! It was never about civil rights!" - oldbear in 1968
Claiming I or my family did or would have opposed civil rights is complete BS and I resent the cheap shot.

It's fine that you like BLM, but that last post was just slimy, Porteroso.

Show me one time - ever - that I posted a racist comment here on SicEm365, or apologize for that slander.

My guess is you will just slink away and pretend you didn't say it.

I'm drawing comparisons to like situations. It's not rocket science. If you are against a movement named "black lives matter" in 2021, because some bad actors tried to monetize it, I can't imagine you supported the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s.

And don't pretend you actually want a response. You ignore the points I make in favor of straw man arguments.
Except that BLM really doesn't care about black lives, so there's that.
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rawhide said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

A few articles of interest

'Murder rates go UP dramatically after BLM protests, study finds'

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/murder-rates-go-up-dramatically-after-blm-protests-study-finds/ar-BB1fWwzt

"many of the people putting BLM signs on their front lawns and blacking out their social media profiles are unaware of the extent of BLM fanaticism"

https://www.stanforddaily.com/2020/11/15/the-case-against-blm/


"report reveals nearly 570 violent demonstrations--riots--in nearly 220 locations spread all across country."

https://acleddata.com/acleddatanew/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/ACLED_USDataReview_Sum2020_SeptWebPDF.pdf

'The Black Lives Matter Movement Must Solve Its Violence Problem'

https://nationalinterest.org/feature/black-lives-matter-movement-must-solve-its-violence-problem-163732


You're dodging the issue.
No, very much the opposite. Your darling cause celebre is a gang of violent thugs.

People who want equality are violent thugs? OK bud. Where is that evidence that less than 95% of BLM protests over last summer were peaceful?
BLM was never about equality.

They are marxists

https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-co-founder-describes-herself-as-trained-marxist/

They use donations for their personal gain

https://nypost.com/2021/04/10/inside-blm-co-founder-patrisse-khan-cullors-real-estate-buying-binge/

They use violence to destabilize the nation

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/08/31/riots-violence-erupting-turning-many-away-blm-and-protests-column/5675343002/

https://www.politicsweb.co.za/politics/blm-use-of-violence-can-be-rational--nmf

https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/07/black-lives-matter-hypocrisy-cheering-violence/


There is a reason most Americans no longer trust or support BLM. The name was always a lie, promoting something very different from their real aims and objectives.


You've fallen for the right wing narrative. There are plenty of bad actors who try to take over good movements for personal gain, but that does not affect the movement itself.

There were people like you who criticized the civil rights movement after Dr King was assassinated. There were bad actors who tried to monetize it, and it gave people like you an excuse to dismiss the entire movement.

"See, Dr King just wanted to get rich! It was never about civil rights!" - oldbear in 1968
Claiming I or my family did or would have opposed civil rights is complete BS and I resent the cheap shot.

It's fine that you like BLM, but that last post was just slimy, Porteroso.

Show me one time - ever - that I posted a racist comment here on SicEm365, or apologize for that slander.

My guess is you will just slink away and pretend you didn't say it.

I'm drawing comparisons to like situations. It's not rocket science. If you are against a movement named "black lives matter" in 2021, because some bad actors tried to monetize it, I can't imagine you supported the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s.

And don't pretend you actually want a response. You ignore the points I make in favor of straw man arguments.
Except that BLM really doesn't care about black lives, so there's that.


Let me check the card but I do believe we have a Bingo here.
Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

A few articles of interest

'Murder rates go UP dramatically after BLM protests, study finds'

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/murder-rates-go-up-dramatically-after-blm-protests-study-finds/ar-BB1fWwzt

"many of the people putting BLM signs on their front lawns and blacking out their social media profiles are unaware of the extent of BLM fanaticism"

https://www.stanforddaily.com/2020/11/15/the-case-against-blm/


"report reveals nearly 570 violent demonstrations--riots--in nearly 220 locations spread all across country."

https://acleddata.com/acleddatanew/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/ACLED_USDataReview_Sum2020_SeptWebPDF.pdf

'The Black Lives Matter Movement Must Solve Its Violence Problem'

https://nationalinterest.org/feature/black-lives-matter-movement-must-solve-its-violence-problem-163732


You're dodging the issue.
No, very much the opposite. Your darling cause celebre is a gang of violent thugs.

People who want equality are violent thugs? OK bud. Where is that evidence that less than 95% of BLM protests over last summer were peaceful?
BLM was never about equality.

They are marxists

https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-co-founder-describes-herself-as-trained-marxist/

They use donations for their personal gain

https://nypost.com/2021/04/10/inside-blm-co-founder-patrisse-khan-cullors-real-estate-buying-binge/

They use violence to destabilize the nation

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/08/31/riots-violence-erupting-turning-many-away-blm-and-protests-column/5675343002/

https://www.politicsweb.co.za/politics/blm-use-of-violence-can-be-rational--nmf

https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/07/black-lives-matter-hypocrisy-cheering-violence/


There is a reason most Americans no longer trust or support BLM. The name was always a lie, promoting something very different from their real aims and objectives.


You've fallen for the right wing narrative. There are plenty of bad actors who try to take over good movements for personal gain, but that does not affect the movement itself.

There were people like you who criticized the civil rights movement after Dr King was assassinated. There were bad actors who tried to monetize it, and it gave people like you an excuse to dismiss the entire movement.

"See, Dr King just wanted to get rich! It was never about civil rights!" - oldbear in 1968
Claiming I or my family did or would have opposed civil rights is complete BS and I resent the cheap shot.

It's fine that you like BLM, but that last post was just slimy, Porteroso.

Show me one time - ever - that I posted a racist comment here on SicEm365, or apologize for that slander.

My guess is you will just slink away and pretend you didn't say it.

I'm drawing comparisons to like situations. It's not rocket science. If you are against a movement named "black lives matter" in 2021, because some bad actors tried to monetize it, I can't imagine you supported the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s.

And don't pretend you actually want a response. You ignore
the points I make in favor of straw man arguments.

The black power movement was a precursor to BLM. When In 1969 John Carlos raised a black gloved fist on the Olympic podium the right went nuts. I had bought into the media's' portrayal of the Black Power movement. Old bear et al are to quick to judge. I was/am to quick to judge. I bought into too many distorted portrayals left and right. I pray for better understanding before a rush to judgment according to what Fox or MSNBC.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rawhide said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

A few articles of interest

'Murder rates go UP dramatically after BLM protests, study finds'

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/murder-rates-go-up-dramatically-after-blm-protests-study-finds/ar-BB1fWwzt

"many of the people putting BLM signs on their front lawns and blacking out their social media profiles are unaware of the extent of BLM fanaticism"

https://www.stanforddaily.com/2020/11/15/the-case-against-blm/


"report reveals nearly 570 violent demonstrations--riots--in nearly 220 locations spread all across country."

https://acleddata.com/acleddatanew/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/ACLED_USDataReview_Sum2020_SeptWebPDF.pdf

'The Black Lives Matter Movement Must Solve Its Violence Problem'

https://nationalinterest.org/feature/black-lives-matter-movement-must-solve-its-violence-problem-163732


You're dodging the issue.
No, very much the opposite. Your darling cause celebre is a gang of violent thugs.

People who want equality are violent thugs? OK bud. Where is that evidence that less than 95% of BLM protests over last summer were peaceful?
BLM was never about equality.

They are marxists

https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-co-founder-describes-herself-as-trained-marxist/

They use donations for their personal gain

https://nypost.com/2021/04/10/inside-blm-co-founder-patrisse-khan-cullors-real-estate-buying-binge/

They use violence to destabilize the nation

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/08/31/riots-violence-erupting-turning-many-away-blm-and-protests-column/5675343002/

https://www.politicsweb.co.za/politics/blm-use-of-violence-can-be-rational--nmf

https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/07/black-lives-matter-hypocrisy-cheering-violence/


There is a reason most Americans no longer trust or support BLM. The name was always a lie, promoting something very different from their real aims and objectives.


You've fallen for the right wing narrative. There are plenty of bad actors who try to take over good movements for personal gain, but that does not affect the movement itself.

There were people like you who criticized the civil rights movement after Dr King was assassinated. There were bad actors who tried to monetize it, and it gave people like you an excuse to dismiss the entire movement.

"See, Dr King just wanted to get rich! It was never about civil rights!" - oldbear in 1968
Claiming I or my family did or would have opposed civil rights is complete BS and I resent the cheap shot.

It's fine that you like BLM, but that last post was just slimy, Porteroso.

Show me one time - ever - that I posted a racist comment here on SicEm365, or apologize for that slander.

My guess is you will just slink away and pretend you didn't say it.

I'm drawing comparisons to like situations. It's not rocket science. If you are against a movement named "black lives matter" in 2021, because some bad actors tried to monetize it, I can't imagine you supported the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s.

And don't pretend you actually want a response. You ignore the points I make in favor of straw man arguments.
Except that BLM really doesn't care about black lives, so there's that.
I don't think we are thinking the same thing when we say "BLM." I am thinking of a grassroots movement of equality and fairness, that only recently used "black lives matter" as a slogan. You must be thinking of the bad actors who are trying to establish themselves as leaders of the movement, and monetize it.

So yes, the BLM "leaders" don't care about anything other than money.

Most people who would say they support BLM support the slogan, the same way they support the greater movement fighting for equality and fairness.

I mean it's called black lives matter, and your response is that black lives matter doesn't really care about black lives? You've got to see how ridiculous you sound. And if you're going to be honest, you need to differentiate between the larger movement, and the bad actors seeking to monetize the movement, as bad actors always have and always will.
muddybrazos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Rawhide said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

A few articles of interest

'Murder rates go UP dramatically after BLM protests, study finds'

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/murder-rates-go-up-dramatically-after-blm-protests-study-finds/ar-BB1fWwzt

"many of the people putting BLM signs on their front lawns and blacking out their social media profiles are unaware of the extent of BLM fanaticism"

https://www.stanforddaily.com/2020/11/15/the-case-against-blm/


"report reveals nearly 570 violent demonstrations--riots--in nearly 220 locations spread all across country."

https://acleddata.com/acleddatanew/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/ACLED_USDataReview_Sum2020_SeptWebPDF.pdf

'The Black Lives Matter Movement Must Solve Its Violence Problem'

https://nationalinterest.org/feature/black-lives-matter-movement-must-solve-its-violence-problem-163732


You're dodging the issue.
No, very much the opposite. Your darling cause celebre is a gang of violent thugs.

People who want equality are violent thugs? OK bud. Where is that evidence that less than 95% of BLM protests over last summer were peaceful?
BLM was never about equality.

They are marxists

https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-co-founder-describes-herself-as-trained-marxist/

They use donations for their personal gain

https://nypost.com/2021/04/10/inside-blm-co-founder-patrisse-khan-cullors-real-estate-buying-binge/

They use violence to destabilize the nation

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/08/31/riots-violence-erupting-turning-many-away-blm-and-protests-column/5675343002/

https://www.politicsweb.co.za/politics/blm-use-of-violence-can-be-rational--nmf

https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/07/black-lives-matter-hypocrisy-cheering-violence/


There is a reason most Americans no longer trust or support BLM. The name was always a lie, promoting something very different from their real aims and objectives.


You've fallen for the right wing narrative. There are plenty of bad actors who try to take over good movements for personal gain, but that does not affect the movement itself.

There were people like you who criticized the civil rights movement after Dr King was assassinated. There were bad actors who tried to monetize it, and it gave people like you an excuse to dismiss the entire movement.

"See, Dr King just wanted to get rich! It was never about civil rights!" - oldbear in 1968
Claiming I or my family did or would have opposed civil rights is complete BS and I resent the cheap shot.

It's fine that you like BLM, but that last post was just slimy, Porteroso.

Show me one time - ever - that I posted a racist comment here on SicEm365, or apologize for that slander.

My guess is you will just slink away and pretend you didn't say it.

I'm drawing comparisons to like situations. It's not rocket science. If you are against a movement named "black lives matter" in 2021, because some bad actors tried to monetize it, I can't imagine you supported the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s.

And don't pretend you actually want a response. You ignore the points I make in favor of straw man arguments.
Except that BLM really doesn't care about black lives, so there's that.
I don't think we are thinking the same thing when we say "BLM." I am thinking of a grassroots movement of equality and fairness, that only recently used "black lives matter" as a slogan. You must be thinking of the bad actors who are trying to establish themselves as leaders of the movement, and monetize it.

So yes, the BLM "leaders" don't care about anything other than money.

Most people who would say they support BLM support the slogan, the same way they support the greater movement fighting for equality and fairness.

I mean it's called black lives matter, and your response is that black lives matter doesn't really care about black lives? You've got to see how ridiculous you sound. And if you're going to be honest, you need to differentiate between the larger movement, and the bad actors seeking to monetize the movement, as bad actors always have and always will.
If BLM said we are going to march in support of cleaning up communities and helping to end gang violence then I would support that cause. Until they do that then they are not really serious about helping the black community. They have done more to hurt the black community than help bc it seems to me that race relations have gotten a lot worse since they have come on the scene. Advocating for ending the nuclear family is not a good solution. Calling for defunding the police is also not a good solution bc that leads to more violence in those communities.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
muddybrazos said:

Porteroso said:

Rawhide said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

A few articles of interest

'Murder rates go UP dramatically after BLM protests, study finds'

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/murder-rates-go-up-dramatically-after-blm-protests-study-finds/ar-BB1fWwzt

"many of the people putting BLM signs on their front lawns and blacking out their social media profiles are unaware of the extent of BLM fanaticism"

https://www.stanforddaily.com/2020/11/15/the-case-against-blm/


"report reveals nearly 570 violent demonstrations--riots--in nearly 220 locations spread all across country."

https://acleddata.com/acleddatanew/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/ACLED_USDataReview_Sum2020_SeptWebPDF.pdf

'The Black Lives Matter Movement Must Solve Its Violence Problem'

https://nationalinterest.org/feature/black-lives-matter-movement-must-solve-its-violence-problem-163732


You're dodging the issue.
No, very much the opposite. Your darling cause celebre is a gang of violent thugs.

People who want equality are violent thugs? OK bud. Where is that evidence that less than 95% of BLM protests over last summer were peaceful?
BLM was never about equality.

They are marxists

https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-co-founder-describes-herself-as-trained-marxist/

They use donations for their personal gain

https://nypost.com/2021/04/10/inside-blm-co-founder-patrisse-khan-cullors-real-estate-buying-binge/

They use violence to destabilize the nation

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/08/31/riots-violence-erupting-turning-many-away-blm-and-protests-column/5675343002/

https://www.politicsweb.co.za/politics/blm-use-of-violence-can-be-rational--nmf

https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/07/black-lives-matter-hypocrisy-cheering-violence/


There is a reason most Americans no longer trust or support BLM. The name was always a lie, promoting something very different from their real aims and objectives.


You've fallen for the right wing narrative. There are plenty of bad actors who try to take over good movements for personal gain, but that does not affect the movement itself.

There were people like you who criticized the civil rights movement after Dr King was assassinated. There were bad actors who tried to monetize it, and it gave people like you an excuse to dismiss the entire movement.

"See, Dr King just wanted to get rich! It was never about civil rights!" - oldbear in 1968
Claiming I or my family did or would have opposed civil rights is complete BS and I resent the cheap shot.

It's fine that you like BLM, but that last post was just slimy, Porteroso.

Show me one time - ever - that I posted a racist comment here on SicEm365, or apologize for that slander.

My guess is you will just slink away and pretend you didn't say it.

I'm drawing comparisons to like situations. It's not rocket science. If you are against a movement named "black lives matter" in 2021, because some bad actors tried to monetize it, I can't imagine you supported the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s.

And don't pretend you actually want a response. You ignore the points I make in favor of straw man arguments.
Except that BLM really doesn't care about black lives, so there's that.
I don't think we are thinking the same thing when we say "BLM." I am thinking of a grassroots movement of equality and fairness, that only recently used "black lives matter" as a slogan. You must be thinking of the bad actors who are trying to establish themselves as leaders of the movement, and monetize it.

So yes, the BLM "leaders" don't care about anything other than money.

Most people who would say they support BLM support the slogan, the same way they support the greater movement fighting for equality and fairness.

I mean it's called black lives matter, and your response is that black lives matter doesn't really care about black lives? You've got to see how ridiculous you sound. And if you're going to be honest, you need to differentiate between the larger movement, and the bad actors seeking to monetize the movement, as bad actors always have and always will.
If BLM said we are going to march in support of cleaning up communities and helping to end gang violence then I would support that cause. Until they do that then they are not really serious about helping the black community. They have done more to hurt the black community than help bc it seems to me that race relations have gotten a lot worse since they have come on the scene. Advocating for ending the nuclear family is not a good solution. Calling for defunding the police is also not a good solution bc that leads to more violence in those communities.

There are many in the BLM movement who are doing those things. The truth is that "dirty communities" or gang violence, the 2 things you mentioned, are not limited to black Americans, but are symptoms of poverty, and especially generational poverty. I sincerely hope you don't blame people's color of skin for those, and are willing to see the root issue.

Poverty is a difficult thing to solve, but look around. We aren't making progress, we are regressing. The middle class is smaller than it has been since the Great Depression.

Sentiments like defund the police are bone headed, but it is true that shoving police at poverty does nothing to solve it. More police in gang riddled, impoverished communities won't actually solve the issue of widespread poverty.

That's not to say we should ignore it, or not have cops patrol, but more police doesn't actually help grow the middle class.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Rawhide said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

A few articles of interest

'Murder rates go UP dramatically after BLM protests, study finds'

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/murder-rates-go-up-dramatically-after-blm-protests-study-finds/ar-BB1fWwzt

"many of the people putting BLM signs on their front lawns and blacking out their social media profiles are unaware of the extent of BLM fanaticism"

https://www.stanforddaily.com/2020/11/15/the-case-against-blm/


"report reveals nearly 570 violent demonstrations--riots--in nearly 220 locations spread all across country."

https://acleddata.com/acleddatanew/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/ACLED_USDataReview_Sum2020_SeptWebPDF.pdf

'The Black Lives Matter Movement Must Solve Its Violence Problem'

https://nationalinterest.org/feature/black-lives-matter-movement-must-solve-its-violence-problem-163732


You're dodging the issue.
No, very much the opposite. Your darling cause celebre is a gang of violent thugs.

People who want equality are violent thugs? OK bud. Where is that evidence that less than 95% of BLM protests over last summer were peaceful?
BLM was never about equality.

They are marxists

https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-co-founder-describes-herself-as-trained-marxist/

They use donations for their personal gain

https://nypost.com/2021/04/10/inside-blm-co-founder-patrisse-khan-cullors-real-estate-buying-binge/

They use violence to destabilize the nation

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/08/31/riots-violence-erupting-turning-many-away-blm-and-protests-column/5675343002/

https://www.politicsweb.co.za/politics/blm-use-of-violence-can-be-rational--nmf

https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/07/black-lives-matter-hypocrisy-cheering-violence/


There is a reason most Americans no longer trust or support BLM. The name was always a lie, promoting something very different from their real aims and objectives.


You've fallen for the right wing narrative. There are plenty of bad actors who try to take over good movements for personal gain, but that does not affect the movement itself.

There were people like you who criticized the civil rights movement after Dr King was assassinated. There were bad actors who tried to monetize it, and it gave people like you an excuse to dismiss the entire movement.

"See, Dr King just wanted to get rich! It was never about civil rights!" - oldbear in 1968
Claiming I or my family did or would have opposed civil rights is complete BS and I resent the cheap shot.

It's fine that you like BLM, but that last post was just slimy, Porteroso.

Show me one time - ever - that I posted a racist comment here on SicEm365, or apologize for that slander.

My guess is you will just slink away and pretend you didn't say it.

I'm drawing comparisons to like situations. It's not rocket science. If you are against a movement named "black lives matter" in 2021, because some bad actors tried to monetize it, I can't imagine you supported the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s.

And don't pretend you actually want a response. You ignore the points I make in favor of straw man arguments.
Except that BLM really doesn't care about black lives, so there's that.
I don't think we are thinking the same thing when we say "BLM." I am thinking of a grassroots movement of equality and fairness, that only recently used "black lives matter" as a slogan. You must be thinking of the bad actors who are trying to establish themselves as leaders of the movement, and monetize it.

So yes, the BLM "leaders" don't care about anything other than money.

Most people who would say they support BLM support the slogan, the same way they support the greater movement fighting for equality and fairness.

I mean it's called black lives matter, and your response is that black lives matter doesn't really care about black lives? You've got to see how ridiculous you sound. And if you're going to be honest, you need to differentiate between the larger movement, and the bad actors seeking to monetize the movement, as bad actors always have and always will.
It's ridiculous that black lives matter haven't actually done anything that about black lives in places like detrois, st. louis, chicago, etc....

If they cared, they'd be there.

Also, please direct to white people have extra rights that black people don't?
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rawhide said:

Porteroso said:

Rawhide said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

A few articles of interest

'Murder rates go UP dramatically after BLM protests, study finds'

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/murder-rates-go-up-dramatically-after-blm-protests-study-finds/ar-BB1fWwzt

"many of the people putting BLM signs on their front lawns and blacking out their social media profiles are unaware of the extent of BLM fanaticism"

https://www.stanforddaily.com/2020/11/15/the-case-against-blm/


"report reveals nearly 570 violent demonstrations--riots--in nearly 220 locations spread all across country."

https://acleddata.com/acleddatanew/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/ACLED_USDataReview_Sum2020_SeptWebPDF.pdf

'The Black Lives Matter Movement Must Solve Its Violence Problem'

https://nationalinterest.org/feature/black-lives-matter-movement-must-solve-its-violence-problem-163732


You're dodging the issue.
No, very much the opposite. Your darling cause celebre is a gang of violent thugs.

People who want equality are violent thugs? OK bud. Where is that evidence that less than 95% of BLM protests over last summer were peaceful?
BLM was never about equality.

They are marxists

https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-co-founder-describes-herself-as-trained-marxist/

They use donations for their personal gain

https://nypost.com/2021/04/10/inside-blm-co-founder-patrisse-khan-cullors-real-estate-buying-binge/

They use violence to destabilize the nation

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/08/31/riots-violence-erupting-turning-many-away-blm-and-protests-column/5675343002/

https://www.politicsweb.co.za/politics/blm-use-of-violence-can-be-rational--nmf

https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/07/black-lives-matter-hypocrisy-cheering-violence/


There is a reason most Americans no longer trust or support BLM. The name was always a lie, promoting something very different from their real aims and objectives.


You've fallen for the right wing narrative. There are plenty of bad actors who try to take over good movements for personal gain, but that does not affect the movement itself.

There were people like you who criticized the civil rights movement after Dr King was assassinated. There were bad actors who tried to monetize it, and it gave people like you an excuse to dismiss the entire movement.

"See, Dr King just wanted to get rich! It was never about civil rights!" - oldbear in 1968
Claiming I or my family did or would have opposed civil rights is complete BS and I resent the cheap shot.

It's fine that you like BLM, but that last post was just slimy, Porteroso.

Show me one time - ever - that I posted a racist comment here on SicEm365, or apologize for that slander.

My guess is you will just slink away and pretend you didn't say it.

I'm drawing comparisons to like situations. It's not rocket science. If you are against a movement named "black lives matter" in 2021, because some bad actors tried to monetize it, I can't imagine you supported the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s.

And don't pretend you actually want a response. You ignore the points I make in favor of straw man arguments.
Except that BLM really doesn't care about black lives, so there's that.
I don't think we are thinking the same thing when we say "BLM." I am thinking of a grassroots movement of equality and fairness, that only recently used "black lives matter" as a slogan. You must be thinking of the bad actors who are trying to establish themselves as leaders of the movement, and monetize it.

So yes, the BLM "leaders" don't care about anything other than money.

Most people who would say they support BLM support the slogan, the same way they support the greater movement fighting for equality and fairness.

I mean it's called black lives matter, and your response is that black lives matter doesn't really care about black lives? You've got to see how ridiculous you sound. And if you're going to be honest, you need to differentiate between the larger movement, and the bad actors seeking to monetize the movement, as bad actors always have and always will.
It's ridiculous that black lives matter haven't actually done anything that about black lives in places like detrois, st. louis, chicago, etc....

If they cared, they'd be there.

Also, please direct to white people have extra rights that black people don't?

You didn't even read my post, so I'm not about to continue this. You keep attacking a movement named "black lives matter" and shouting "I'm not racist." Discourse is dead in this country.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Your problem, Porteroso, is that the BLM movement has - by its actions - made plain that their name is a lie. They don't care any more about helping black people than did David Duke. The fact that most crime against Black people is by other Black people is something you and BLM ignore - you only want to attack White people. The fact that the path out of Poverty for most people, regardless of color, is to have two parents, finish high school, and not have children until you finish high school and get married, is of no value to BLM or to you.

You are all about false accusations, and BLM is all about their personal gain, as the real estate deals by their leader shows. BLM advances a Marxist agenda, again by the claim of their own founder. Whatever the ground level member of BLM wants to believe, the group is manipulated for financial and political power for a very few, and does nothing to help Black people in the main.

As R2 warned you before, the BLM now is painfully similar to the KKK. Racist, self-serving, myopic, malicious and dishonest to the core.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Your problem, Porteroso, is that the BLM movement has - by its actions - made plain that their name is a lie. They don't care any more about helping black people than did David Duke. The fact that most crime against Black people is by other Black people is something you and BLM ignore - you only want to attack White people. The fact that the path out of Poverty for most people, regardless of color, is to have two parents, finish high school, and not have children until you finish high school and get married, is of no value to BLM or to you.

You are all about false accusations, and BLM is all about their personal gain, as the real estate deals by their leader shows. BLM advances a Marxist agenda, again by the claim of their own founder. Whatever the ground level member of BLM wants to believe, the group is manipulated for financial and political power for a very few, and does nothing to help Black people in the main.

As R2 warned you before, the BLM now is painfully similar to the KKK. Racist, self-serving, myopic, malicious and dishonest to the core.

Comparing the racism of the KKK to a movement called black lives matter. I didn't even register it when R2 said it.

You're mistaken.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Your problem, Porteroso, is that the BLM movement has - by its actions - made plain that their name is a lie. They don't care any more about helping black people than did David Duke. The fact that most crime against Black people is by other Black people is something you and BLM ignore - you only want to attack White people. The fact that the path out of Poverty for most people, regardless of color, is to have two parents, finish high school, and not have children until you finish high school and get married, is of no value to BLM or to you.

You are all about false accusations, and BLM is all about their personal gain, as the real estate deals by their leader shows. BLM advances a Marxist agenda, again by the claim of their own founder. Whatever the ground level member of BLM wants to believe, the group is manipulated for financial and political power for a very few, and does nothing to help Black people in the main.

As R2 warned you before, the BLM now is painfully similar to the KKK. Racist, self-serving, myopic, malicious and dishonest to the core.

Comparing the racism of the KKK to a movement called black lives matter. I didn't even register it when R2 said it.

You're mistaken.
I think not. I think you have chosen poorly in groups you defend, Porteroso.

That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rawhide said:

quash said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

quash said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

A few articles of interest

'Murder rates go UP dramatically after BLM protests, study finds'

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/murder-rates-go-up-dramatically-after-blm-protests-study-finds/ar-BB1fWwzt

"many of the people putting BLM signs on their front lawns and blacking out their social media profiles are unaware of the extent of BLM fanaticism"

https://www.stanforddaily.com/2020/11/15/the-case-against-blm/


"report reveals nearly 570 violent demonstrations--riots--in nearly 220 locations spread all across country."

https://acleddata.com/acleddatanew/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/ACLED_USDataReview_Sum2020_SeptWebPDF.pdf

'The Black Lives Matter Movement Must Solve Its Violence Problem'

https://nationalinterest.org/feature/black-lives-matter-movement-must-solve-its-violence-problem-163732


You're dodging the issue.
No, very much the opposite. Your darling cause celebre is a gang of violent thugs.

People who want equality are violent thugs? OK bud. Where is that evidence that less than 95% of BLM protests over last summer were peaceful?
Yes. Antifa and BLM are violent thugs. They should be treated as such and flushed.

You want to flush me? What does that mean?

Don't ever want to sugarcoat, Mr. Libertarian, but I think it means you are a turd!
And when you lay with the dogs, you usually get fleas.


So you want to drown me for a peaceful march, a peaceful rally, and a neighborhood clean up? Or because 7% of last summer's protests turned violent you want to drown the participants in the peaceful 93%, Mr. Living in Fear?

615 people have been charged in connection with the Capitol Building incident on Jan 6th. Can't find it now, but I saw an estimate of 800 people entered the building, but I'll go head and double the amount (going off the number of those that have been charged) to 1,200.

Can't find an accurate estimate of the crowd at Trump's rally that day, but 30,000 were expected, so I'll use that figure.

1,200 people out of 30,000 represent 4%.

So, I'm glad to know, using your logic, that you think Trump's protest/rally was mostly peaceful on Jan 6th.
My logic was on the events, not the attendance numbers.

But you knew that.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

You are late with weak efforts. Stop supporting hate, Porteroso.
I'm not actually thinking you care about truth or facts, I'm posting this because other people read the forum, and aren't all so obtuse as you.

It does matter, if you're lying. It may not matter to you, in fact I have evidence it does not. Evidence of your lies may come entire days after your lie, but it's never too late for the truth! Truth seeker Porter over here, defending the world against old bears and their lies.
BLM is the current Progressive version of the KKK. The fact that you defend and align with them and Antifa tells us all we need to know about you.

Astounding amount of ignorance there.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Your problem, Porteroso, is that the BLM movement has - by its actions - made plain that their name is a lie. They don't care any more about helping black people than did David Duke. The fact that most crime against Black people is by other Black people is something you and BLM ignore - you only want to attack White people. The fact that the path out of Poverty for most people, regardless of color, is to have two parents, finish high school, and not have children until you finish high school and get married, is of no value to BLM or to you.

You are all about false accusations, and BLM is all about their personal gain, as the real estate deals by their leader shows. BLM advances a Marxist agenda, again by the claim of their own founder. Whatever the ground level member of BLM wants to believe, the group is manipulated for financial and political power for a very few, and does nothing to help Black people in the main.

As R2 warned you before, the BLM now is painfully similar to the KKK. Racist, self-serving, myopic, malicious and dishonest to the core.

Comparing the racism of the KKK to a movement called black lives matter. I didn't even register it when R2 said it.

You're mistaken.
I think not. I think you have chosen poorly in groups you defend, Porteroso.



If there was ever a use for the term white fragility, it's right here. White people saying the racism of black lives matter is comparable to the KKK. I'm not sure if it's worse that you are normalizing the racism of the KKK, or that you are threatened by a group of people seeking fairness and equality, but frail whiteness indeed.
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

You are late with weak efforts. Stop supporting hate, Porteroso.
I'm not actually thinking you care about truth or facts, I'm posting this because other people read the forum, and aren't all so obtuse as you.

It does matter, if you're lying. It may not matter to you, in fact I have evidence it does not. Evidence of your lies may come entire days after your lie, but it's never too late for the truth! Truth seeker Porter over here, defending the world against old bears and their lies.
BLM is the current Progressive version of the KKK. The fact that you defend and align with them and Antifa tells us all we need to know about you.

Astounding amount of ignorance there.

Wonderful and well-thought out response. I have come to expect nothing more from you and your Progressive Left brethren.

"Pigs in a blanket... fry like bacon!". You own it.
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

You are late with weak efforts. Stop supporting hate, Porteroso.
I'm not actually thinking you care about truth or facts, I'm posting this because other people read the forum, and aren't all so obtuse as you.

It does matter, if you're lying. It may not matter to you, in fact I have evidence it does not. Evidence of your lies may come entire days after your lie, but it's never too late for the truth! Truth seeker Porter over here, defending the world against old bears and their lies.
BLM is the current Progressive version of the KKK. The fact that you defend and align with them and Antifa tells us all we need to know about you.

Astounding amount of ignorance there.

That is indeed a good description of BLM.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Your problem, Porteroso, is that the BLM movement has - by its actions - made plain that their name is a lie. They don't care any more about helping black people than did David Duke. The fact that most crime against Black people is by other Black people is something you and BLM ignore - you only want to attack White people. The fact that the path out of Poverty for most people, regardless of color, is to have two parents, finish high school, and not have children until you finish high school and get married, is of no value to BLM or to you.

You are all about false accusations, and BLM is all about their personal gain, as the real estate deals by their leader shows. BLM advances a Marxist agenda, again by the claim of their own founder. Whatever the ground level member of BLM wants to believe, the group is manipulated for financial and political power for a very few, and does nothing to help Black people in the main.

As R2 warned you before, the BLM now is painfully similar to the KKK. Racist, self-serving, myopic, malicious and dishonest to the core.

Comparing the racism of the KKK to a movement called black lives matter. I didn't even register it when R2 said it.

You're mistaken.
I think not. I think you have chosen poorly in groups you defend, Porteroso.



If there was ever a use for the term white fragility, it's right here. White people saying the racism of black lives matter is comparable to the KKK. I'm not sure if it's worse that you are normalizing the racism of the KKK, or that you are threatened by a group of people seeking fairness and equality, but frail whiteness indeed.
Pretending BLM seeks 'fairness and equality' is naive, given the statements of their leadership and the behavior of the past 5 years.

It's simply not true from their actions and focus. Rather, it is reasonable to describe the behavior of BLM as racist and malicious.

That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Your problem, Porteroso, is that the BLM movement has - by its actions - made plain that their name is a lie. They don't care any more about helping black people than did David Duke. The fact that most crime against Black people is by other Black people is something you and BLM ignore - you only want to attack White people. The fact that the path out of Poverty for most people, regardless of color, is to have two parents, finish high school, and not have children until you finish high school and get married, is of no value to BLM or to you.

You are all about false accusations, and BLM is all about their personal gain, as the real estate deals by their leader shows. BLM advances a Marxist agenda, again by the claim of their own founder. Whatever the ground level member of BLM wants to believe, the group is manipulated for financial and political power for a very few, and does nothing to help Black people in the main.

As R2 warned you before, the BLM now is painfully similar to the KKK. Racist, self-serving, myopic, malicious and dishonest to the core.

Comparing the racism of the KKK to a movement called black lives matter. I didn't even register it when R2 said it.

You're mistaken.
I think not. I think you have chosen poorly in groups you defend, Porteroso.



If there was ever a use for the term white fragility, it's right here. White people saying the racism of black lives matter is comparable to the KKK. I'm not sure if it's worse that you are normalizing the racism of the KKK, or that you are threatened by a group of people seeking fairness and equality, but frail whiteness indeed.
Pretending BLM seeks 'fairness and equality' is naive, given the statements of their leadership and the behavior of the past 5 years.

It's simply not true from their actions and focus. Rather, it is reasonable to describe the behavior of BLM as racist and malicious.


yeah, but come on, man! They have a great name... that great name tells me everything I need to know about that group. They really care, they really do, because their name tells us so.

How dare you ignore their name and instead look at their actions.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"The sacred ideal for us has never been the Federal Union. But the consent of the people and freedom of the States."

"The Union was formed by the voluntary agreement of the states; and in uniting together they have not forfeited their nationality nor have they been reduced to the condition of one and the same people If one of the states choose to withdraw from the compact, it would be difficult to disprove its rights of doing so, and the #Federal Government would have no means of maintaining its claims directly either by force or right." M DeTocqueville,

"The Union...is a means and not an end. While it can be used to promote the great interests of freedom...the moment it ceases to answer that end or becomes an engine of tyranny & oppression, it should be at once & for ever repudiated" -Amasa Walker

quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

quash said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

You are late with weak efforts. Stop supporting hate, Porteroso.
I'm not actually thinking you care about truth or facts, I'm posting this because other people read the forum, and aren't all so obtuse as you.

It does matter, if you're lying. It may not matter to you, in fact I have evidence it does not. Evidence of your lies may come entire days after your lie, but it's never too late for the truth! Truth seeker Porter over here, defending the world against old bears and their lies.
BLM is the current Progressive version of the KKK. The fact that you defend and align with them and Antifa tells us all we need to know about you.

Astounding amount of ignorance there.

Wonderful and well-thought out response. I have come to expect nothing more from you and your Progressive Left brethren.

"Pigs in a blanket... fry like bacon!". You own it.

You got all the thoughtfulness you displayed. Own that.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rawhide said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Your problem, Porteroso, is that the BLM movement has - by its actions - made plain that their name is a lie. They don't care any more about helping black people than did David Duke. The fact that most crime against Black people is by other Black people is something you and BLM ignore - you only want to attack White people. The fact that the path out of Poverty for most people, regardless of color, is to have two parents, finish high school, and not have children until you finish high school and get married, is of no value to BLM or to you.

You are all about false accusations, and BLM is all about their personal gain, as the real estate deals by their leader shows. BLM advances a Marxist agenda, again by the claim of their own founder. Whatever the ground level member of BLM wants to believe, the group is manipulated for financial and political power for a very few, and does nothing to help Black people in the main.

As R2 warned you before, the BLM now is painfully similar to the KKK. Racist, self-serving, myopic, malicious and dishonest to the core.

Comparing the racism of the KKK to a movement called black lives matter. I didn't even register it when R2 said it.

You're mistaken.
I think not. I think you have chosen poorly in groups you defend, Porteroso.



If there was ever a use for the term white fragility, it's right here. White people saying the racism of black lives matter is comparable to the KKK. I'm not sure if it's worse that you are normalizing the racism of the KKK, or that you are threatened by a group of people seeking fairness and equality, but frail whiteness indeed.
Pretending BLM seeks 'fairness and equality' is naive, given the statements of their leadership and the behavior of the past 5 years.

It's simply not true from their actions and focus. Rather, it is reasonable to describe the behavior of BLM as racist and malicious.


yeah, but come on, man! They have a great name... that great name tells me everything I need to know about that group. They really care, they really do, because their name tells us so.

How dare you ignore their name and instead look at their actions.

If you look hard enough at any political movement, you will find bad people acting badly.

As I've explained, there are no "BLM leaders," only bad actors who seek to get rich quick.

What are these bad actions of BLM? As I've posted, there is a right wing narrative that BLM protests were violent. They were not. 95% were entirely peaceful. So what bad actions happened at these peaceful protests?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quash and Porteroso are in full sulk right now.


That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.foxnews.com/us/dallas-sniper-who-gunned-down-5-cops-wanted-to-kill-white-people-chief-says

For the BLM cheerleaders on this thread(quash and Porter) ,- own this!


https://www.dallasnews.com/news/2016/07/11/blacklivesmatter-kills-cops-fort-worth-police-group-claims-in-viral-post/
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

https://www.foxnews.com/us/dallas-sniper-who-gunned-down-5-cops-wanted-to-kill-white-people-chief-says

For the BLM cheerleaders on this thread(quash and Porter) ,- own this!


https://www.dallasnews.com/news/2016/07/11/blacklivesmatter-kills-cops-fort-worth-police-group-claims-in-viral-post/

I already have, way back when it happened. Oddly, I didn't get arrested...
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

https://www.foxnews.com/us/dallas-sniper-who-gunned-down-5-cops-wanted-to-kill-white-people-chief-says

For the BLM cheerleaders on this thread(quash and Porter) ,- own this!


https://www.dallasnews.com/news/2016/07/11/blacklivesmatter-kills-cops-fort-worth-police-group-claims-in-viral-post/

I already have, way back when it happened. Oddly, I didn't get arrested...

Good for you. I'll bet your Mom is proud of her cop-hater son.
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

quash said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

https://www.foxnews.com/us/dallas-sniper-who-gunned-down-5-cops-wanted-to-kill-white-people-chief-says

For the BLM cheerleaders on this thread(quash and Porter) ,- own this!


https://www.dallasnews.com/news/2016/07/11/blacklivesmatter-kills-cops-fort-worth-police-group-claims-in-viral-post/

I already have, way back when it happened. Oddly, I didn't get arrested...

Good for you. I'll bet your Mom is proud of her cop-hater son.

Mom is dead, and I don't hate cops and you know it. You say differently, but you know the truth. Everything I say about criminal justice reform would ultimately make the job of being a policeman safer. I've never seen you say anything constructive about that.

“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.