Eye opening review of Gallimore
lolololol great!BearForce said:
Enjoy....NSFW
or thisBearForce said:
saw that from other pundits tooWichitabear said:
ESPN said we probably got th biggest sleeper in the draft. That Robinson kid. USA Sports said we had one of the top classes!!!
My concerns would be LT, DB and LB assuming the coaching staff likes what they see elsewhere and the addition of draftees.BearForce said:
We may be getting busy at 3pm tomorrow
https://cowboyswire.usatoday.com/2020/04/26/cowboys-get-4-additional-picks-as-comp-window-closes-list-of-available-free-agents/
love it!BearForce said:
Enjoy....NSFW
I don't think we are done at DE personally considering the uncertainty of Alden Smith and Randy Gregory.Assassin said:My concerns would be LT, DB and LB assuming the coaching staff likes what they see elsewhere and the addition of draftees.BearForce said:
We may be getting busy at 3pm tomorrow
https://cowboyswire.usatoday.com/2020/04/26/cowboys-get-4-additional-picks-as-comp-window-closes-list-of-available-free-agents/
Assassin said:love it!BearForce said:
Enjoy....NSFW
Believe!ComradeGoldMind said:
I still can't believe we took offense over all the defensive studs available.
FIFYComradeGoldMind said:
I still can't believe we took best available player over need available.
BearForce said:FIFYComradeGoldMind said:
I still can't believe we took best available player over need available.
Ok so who was the right player?ComradeGoldMind said:BearForce said:FIFYComradeGoldMind said:
I still can't believe we took best available player over need available.
That's a whole other debate for another day.
Taking the best player available doesn't mean you took the right player.
ok...ComradeGoldMind said:
I still can't believe we took offense over that Bearforce stud.
Bottom line, WR3 is a full fledge starter in today's NFL and shouldn't be a place where you skimp on resources.Quote:
In 2019, the Dallas Cowboys deployed their offense in 11-personnel around 61% of the time. That was 11th in the NFL per Sharp Football Stats. With CeeDee Lamb added to the wide receiver mix, I'd imagine that percentage shoots to the top of the NFL leaderboard. The Dallas Cowboys should be 11-personnel and 20-personnel (two running backs and no tight ends) at least 70% of the time moving forward.
Using three-wide receiver formations shouldn't limit how much they run the football with Ezekiel Elliott, either. In 11-personnel, the Dallas Cowboys were successful on 56% of their rushing attempts. The only other formation that had a better success rate was 23 (two running backs, three tight ends), but they only ran out of that formation one time. Out of 11-personnel, the Cowboys ran the football 193 times and averaged 5.2 yards per carry. Compare that to 21 personnel (two running backs, one tight end) where they were successful on 54% of their rush attempts but only averaged 4.5 yards per carry.
BearForce said:Ok so who was the right player?ComradeGoldMind said:BearForce said:FIFYComradeGoldMind said:
I still can't believe we took best available player over need available.
That's a whole other debate for another day.
Taking the best player available doesn't mean you took the right player.
ComradeGoldMind said:BearForce said:Ok so who was the right player?ComradeGoldMind said:BearForce said:FIFYComradeGoldMind said:
I still can't believe we took best available player over need available.
That's a whole other debate for another day.
Taking the best player available doesn't mean you took the right player.
I said earlier, needed a DBack, should have been Arnette. Why don't you think we need a solid Secondary addition?
BearForce said:ComradeGoldMind said:BearForce said:Ok so who was the right player?ComradeGoldMind said:BearForce said:FIFYComradeGoldMind said:
I still can't believe we took best available player over need available.
That's a whole other debate for another day.
Taking the best player available doesn't mean you took the right player.
I said earlier, needed a DBack, should have been Arnette. Why don't you think we need a solid Secondary addition?
I like Diggs better than Arnett
I liked Fulton over Arnett.
Arnett would have been a major reach at 17 and was a reach where is was drafted in round 1
ComradeGoldMind said:BearForce said:ComradeGoldMind said:BearForce said:Ok so who was the right player?ComradeGoldMind said:BearForce said:FIFYComradeGoldMind said:
I still can't believe we took best available player over need available.
That's a whole other debate for another day.
Taking the best player available doesn't mean you took the right player.
I said earlier, needed a DBack, should have been Arnette. Why don't you think we need a solid Secondary addition?
I like Diggs better than Arnett
I liked Fulton over Arnett.
Arnett would have been a major reach at 17 and was a reach where is was drafted in round 1
I'm not pitching a fit over it, we're used to it.
BearForce said:ComradeGoldMind said:BearForce said:ComradeGoldMind said:BearForce said:Ok so who was the right player?ComradeGoldMind said:BearForce said:FIFYComradeGoldMind said:
I still can't believe we took best available player over need available.
That's a whole other debate for another day.
Taking the best player available doesn't mean you took the right player.
I said earlier, needed a DBack, should have been Arnette. Why don't you think we need a solid Secondary addition?
I like Diggs better than Arnett
I liked Fulton over Arnett.
Arnett would have been a major reach at 17 and was a reach where is was drafted in round 1
I'm not pitching a fit over it, we're used to it.
And to be fair if CJ Henderson were on the board I would possibly be more inclined to agree with you.