Yay. The same people who selectively criticize one group for "lack of oversight", "lack of management", "lack of control", "mismanagement", "improper meddling", and making decisions based solely on "what's best for them/self motivated" on a football bases. Are willing to hypocritically ignore and defend the same exact issues for the body ultimately responsible for the oversight and control of the MUCH BIGGER issue on a university wide basis.
I'm in awe these people still exist, much less publically get on their high horse and boast of their hypocrisy. As much, if not more, has been proven and shown regarding the above, at the BOR level through their own PH Report, legal depositions from their own hand picked lackey/interim president, emails, etc.
At the very least, even with their personal biases, no one can argue it's been a colossal mismanagement of the crisis itself and that the university is divided, and would heal quicker with a fresh start.