Krieg said:
Bearish said:
Krieg said:
Bearish said:
PartyBear said:
Rhule pledged "at least 6 wins" even 3 weeks ago. He will not deliver and hence whatever other things he says about his process are also lacking credibility. Rhule is shot here.
We're 5-6 with a shot at a bowl. You can count on one hand the number of plays that makes this team 7-4 right now.
His process is working just fine. You just don't like being in the middle of it.
This is such a stupid argument. It was used last year and it's being used again this year.
Good coaches don't want to be within a score in the 4th with a chance to win. Good coaches want to be ahead in the 1st quarter and build an insurmountable lead ASAP. There's your core difference between Rhule and competent coaches. He's excited that we could've won had everything gone just right. We'll never have a game where everything goes right, and in fact yesterday we had a TON of things go our way and still lost:
- 40 TCU players out, supposedly
- Played against their 3rd string QB that had zero experience and hadn't practiced thinking he'd play, and he had to play basically the entire game
- TCU was missing their best player because he's a criminal (allegedly)
Yet we still found a way to lose.
I'm only arguing that we are improving. Perhaps at a slower pace than we'd all like, but most of us (myself included) were in denial about just how big of a rebuild this job was.
You can be disappointed in a loss, but there is nothing warranting firing this guy. Absolutely nothing. In fact, I challenge you to find one person outside of the CAB-loving Baylor bubble that agrees CMR is underperforming and should be fired. Any article, sound bite or video will do.
For someone that already hired him, though, you're right. We don't have a great reason to fire him.
For someone that thought this was a dumb hire the day it was made (me, for instance) I see a TON of reasons he shouldn't have been hired in the first place.
Maybe that's where we differ. Rhoads should be fired for hiring someone that wanted to nuke everything our team and on-field reputation was built on after lying about doing the opposite, though. He's the reason we hired a guy that keeps trying to cram square pegs in round holes.
You're definitely right about where we differ. I took a wait and see approach from the day we hired him, and I've been sleeping pretty well at night the past two years.
This is what Ive observed from several Baylor fans:
Fan A hated the hire from the beginning, then we lost to Liberty, and Fan A developed this "I told you so" mentality at that point. From then on out, every loss, questionable decision and even the things said at press conferences are used as justification for Fan A's hastily-prepared opinion, which was formed prior to the man stepping foot on campus. Fan A is doomed. Either the team loses, and all his b1tching is validated, or the team wins and he's backtracking from all his previous b1tching. Either way, that guy is a miserable SOB.
Fan B, on the other hand, decided that he'd have to give it some time (at least three years) before even being in a position to form an opinion. Fan B did see what Rhule did at Temple, though, and believed it was possible for him to do the same here. Then we lost to Liberty. At this point, Fan B realized the rebuilding job was much bigger than anyone thought, and prayed the team would show signs of continuous improvement a la Temple Football during 2013-2016. Fan B is a happier person because, at least at this point, it's impossible to be wrong. He hasn't laid claim to something he "knows" because he's watched hundreds of games on TV and is a badass at Madden.