Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

Jack Bauer said:

---

And whether this is Barrett or not is not the point. It is a belief too many White people have: if they have or adopt a child of color, then they can't be racist.

— Ibram X. Kendi (@DrIbram) September 26, 2020

---

Prime examples of the moral and ethical rot, that comes from leftist views.
These comments are disgusting.

---

Yep. Change brown to white and evangelical to Muslim, and she would be cancelled. Usual anti-intellectual, anti-data views from the authoritarians ... I know have many friends that have adopted "brown" children, and to a kid they're all thriving and successful.

---

My sister & brother-in-law each had barriers to conception and adopted two kids from Guatemala. One is on the Aspergers spectrum, intelligent but with learning and socialization limitations and is turning out to be a great citizen and prized employee who always shows up early and outworks his colleagues. The other just graduated from college and has offers from a former employer to manage & learn & ultimately work her way to ownership of franchise businesses.

Such a shame they grew up under systemic oppression. Think what they could have done if they'd only known liberty.

---

And the other billion born into poverty? Who adopts them them?

---

so your solution is to just murder the poor?

---

Seriously. I'm starting to think this guy is a serious genocidal maniac.

---

Waco1947: "Better these people be dead than be poor"

I actually respect him for just coming out and making that argument (horrid as it might be)...because it is the subtext of a lot of liberal arguments in favor of abortion.

That some humans are unworthy of life and a human life not lived in material comfort is worthless.

Glad he is putting the cards out on the table.

---

Fair point. Rather have the national socialists out of the closest so we know where they are.

---

His comment was pure speculation and a straw man about liberals that posters here like to beat on. It's not such fun but it's a lie.
The speculation is wildly inaccurate and a lie and ignorant of liberals. Hell I would hate liberals too if it were true but it is not.

Waco1947 said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

Jack Bauer said:

---

And whether this is Barrett or not is not the point. It is a belief too many White people have: if they have or adopt a child of color, then they can't be racist.

— Ibram X. Kendi (@DrIbram) September 26, 2020

---

Prime examples of the moral and ethical rot, that comes from leftist views.
These comments are disgusting.

---

Yep. Change brown to white and evangelical to Muslim, and she would be cancelled. Usual anti-intellectual, anti-data views from the authoritarians ... I know have many friends that have adopted "brown" children, and to a kid they're all thriving and successful.

---

My sister & brother-in-law each had barriers to conception and adopted two kids from Guatemala. One is on the Aspergers spectrum, intelligent but with learning and socialization limitations and is turning out to be a great citizen and prized employee who always shows up early and outworks his colleagues. The other just graduated from college and has offers from a former employer to manage & learn & ultimately work her way to ownership of franchise businesses.

Such a shame they grew up under systemic oppression. Think what they could have done if they'd only known liberty.

---

And the other billion born into poverty? Who adopts them them?

---

so your solution is to just murder the poor?

---

Pure speculation on your part. It's a straw man

---

No, you're doing the Motte and Bailey routine, and pretty weakly at that.

Several years ago when I entered politics, I met with a grad of BU and BU Law and former Democrat elected official. We had numerous connections via community and family but had never met. The abortion issue came up. This person listened to my pro-life position then asked the same question you posed, only this person phrased it more pointedly...."what about all those black babies born in the projects? How are we going to pay for for all those mouths on Welfare?"

I was momentarily speechless.

But there you have it. They SAY they are worried about the poor. But really, they are worried about something else. And they cover it with the Iron Law of Woke Projection - by calling anyone who disagrees with them racists.

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Amazing how the cult of Molech survives 3,000 years later.

---

There never was a cult of Mlk. It's a form of sacrifice, not a deity.

quash said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Amazing how the cult of Molech survives 3,000 years later.

---

There never was a cult of Mlk. It's a form of sacrifice, not a deity.

---

To what?

Waco1947 said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

Jack Bauer said:

---

And whether this is Barrett or not is not the point. It is a belief too many White people have: if they have or adopt a child of color, then they can't be racist.

— Ibram X. Kendi (@DrIbram) September 26, 2020

---

Prime examples of the moral and ethical rot, that comes from leftist views.
These comments are disgusting.

---

Yep. Change brown to white and evangelical to Muslim, and she would be cancelled. Usual anti-intellectual, anti-data views from the authoritarians ... I know have many friends that have adopted "brown" children, and to a kid they're all thriving and successful.

---

My sister & brother-in-law each had barriers to conception and adopted two kids from Guatemala. One is on the Aspergers spectrum, intelligent but with learning and socialization limitations and is turning out to be a great citizen and prized employee who always shows up early and outworks his colleagues. The other just graduated from college and has offers from a former employer to manage & learn & ultimately work her way to ownership of franchise businesses.

Such a shame they grew up under systemic oppression. Think what they could have done if they'd only known liberty.

---

And the other billion born into poverty? Who adopts them them?

---

so your solution is to just murder the poor?

---

Seriously. I'm starting to think this guy is a serious genocidal maniac.

---

Waco1947: "Better these people be dead than be poor"

I actually respect him for just coming out and making that argument (horrid as it might be)...because it is the subtext of a lot of liberal arguments in favor of abortion.

That some humans are unworthy of life and a human life not lived in material comfort is worthless.

Glad he is putting the cards out on the table.

---

Fair point. Rather have the national socialists out of the closest so we know where they are.

---

His comment was pure speculation and a straw man about liberals that posters here like to beat on. It's not such fun but it's a lie.
The speculation is wildly inaccurate and a lie and ignorant of liberals. Hell I would hate liberals too if it were true but it is not.

---

This explains why you hate yourself. You are a miserable human and, as such, you desire misery on everyone else.

Pure evil.

Waco1947 said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

Jack Bauer said:

---

And whether this is Barrett or not is not the point. It is a belief too many White people have: if they have or adopt a child of color, then they can't be racist.

— Ibram X. Kendi (@DrIbram) September 26, 2020

---

Prime examples of the moral and ethical rot, that comes from leftist views.
These comments are disgusting.

---

Yep. Change brown to white and evangelical to Muslim, and she would be cancelled. Usual anti-intellectual, anti-data views from the authoritarians ... I know have many friends that have adopted "brown" children, and to a kid they're all thriving and successful.

---

My sister & brother-in-law each had barriers to conception and adopted two kids from Guatemala. One is on the Aspergers spectrum, intelligent but with learning and socialization limitations and is turning out to be a great citizen and prized employee who always shows up early and outworks his colleagues. The other just graduated from college and has offers from a former employer to manage & learn & ultimately work her way to ownership of franchise businesses.

Such a shame they grew up under systemic oppression. Think what they could have done if they'd only known liberty.

---

And the other billion born into poverty? Who adopts them them?

---

so your solution is to just murder the poor?

---

Seriously. I'm starting to think this guy is a serious genocidal maniac.

---

Waco1947: "Better these people be dead than be poor"

I actually respect him for just coming out and making that argument (horrid as it might be)...because it is the subtext of a lot of liberal arguments in favor of abortion.

That some humans are unworthy of life and a human life not lived in material comfort is worthless.

Glad he is putting the cards out on the table.

---

Fair point. Rather have the national socialists out of the closest so we know where they are.

---

His comment was pure speculation and a straw man about liberals that posters here like to beat on. It's not such fun but it's a lie.
The speculation is wildly inaccurate and a lie and ignorant of liberals. Hell I would hate liberals too if it were true but it is not.

---

You and Justice Ginsberg and Margaret Sanger just want to keep undesirables from reproducing.

Cobretti said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

Cobretti said:

---

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez rants about how babies in the womb are not a life.

"Oh… you’re harming a life, I believe this is life," she says mockingly. pic.twitter.com/wbMALo9bGC

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) May 20, 2022

---

I'm so shocked to discover that AOC is an idiot... oh wait... known that for years now... nevermind.


Seriously though, why are democrat women the dumbest people in Washington DC?

---

very rarely is someone there to ask her basic questions...

---

I wonder if she knows in Israel a termination committee must vote to allow an abortion to take place.

Mother's Day with special guest Nina Hendee - YouTube



If you have time, this is a powerful reason to adopt.....

Amal Shuq-Up said:

---

quash said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Amazing how the cult of Molech survives 3,000 years later.

---

There never was a cult of Mlk. It's a form of sacrifice, not a deity.

---

To what?

---

Your choice.

quash said:

---

Amal Shuq-Up said:

---

quash said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Amazing how the cult of Molech survives 3,000 years later.

---

There never was a cult of Mlk. It's a form of sacrifice, not a deity.

---

To what?

---

Your choice.

---

People burned their children in the fire to Molech. Molech was a specific deity worshipped by Canaanites. The grammar in the Bible makes it pretty clear. Despite the fact that your wikipedia research says that scholars have debated whether MLK referred to a type of sacrifice since 1935. I will trust the Bible. Its authorship was closer to the sacrifice to Molech and Canaanite culture than twentieth century scholars.

A pro-life position would require universal background checks and no ARs

Waco1947 said:

---

A pro-life position would require universal background checks and no ARs

---

A background check before you engage in sexual contact?

quash said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Amazing how the cult of Molech survives 3,000 years later.

---

There never was a cult of Mlk. It's a form of sacrifice, not a deity.

---

I have a 50-page paper somewhere around here I wrote on the subject with > 100 sources.

Waco1947 said:

---

A pro-life position would require universal background checks and no ARs

---

A pro-life position would ban automobiles.

I'm guessing when you see the faces of those beautiful children in Uvalde you see undesirables that you wish had been aborted instead.

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

A pro-life position would require universal background checks and no ARs

---

A pro-life position would ban automobiles.

---

Yes, but they are regulated for childrens' safety.

Waco1947 said:

---

A pro-life position would require universal background checks and no ARs

---

A pro-life position would let teachers be armed in schools.

quash said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Amazing how the cult of Molech survives 3,000 years later.

---

There never was a cult of Mlk. It's a form of sacrifice, not a deity.

---

Very possible Moloch was a epithet for Baal.

And Baal was certainly worshipped with child sacrifice in the Levant among Punic peoples...and the Carthaginians even took his cult to North Africa when they settled there (they were originally a Punic people) from Tyre.

https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2014-01-23-ancient-carthaginians-really-did-sacrifice-their-children

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baal

Waco1947 said:

---

A pro-life position would require universal background checks and no ARs

---

A pro life position would be to ban fatty foods and sugary drinks. A ban on knives, hammers, any blunt objects. A pro life position would be to cage every American in their very own cells and have the government feed clothe and control their actions every day with no physical human contact possible unless approved and closely monitored by the jai...sorry, compassionate government.

Amal Shuq-Up said:

---

quash said:

---

Amal Shuq-Up said:

---

quash said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Amazing how the cult of Molech survives 3,000 years later.

---

There never was a cult of Mlk. It's a form of sacrifice, not a deity.

---

To what?

---

Your choice.

---

People burned their children in the fire to Molech. Molech was a specific deity worshipped by Canaanites. The grammar in the Bible makes it pretty clear. Despite the fact that your wikipedia research says that scholars have debated whether MLK referred to a type of sacrifice since 1935. I will trust the Bible. Its authorship was closer to the sacrifice to Molech and Canaanite culture than twentieth century scholars.

---

Lol, just because it on Wk doesn't mean your outdated reading of the KJV prevails.

"La" is the preposition you have wrong. Funny that Wiki doesn't mention that and I still know about it...

quash said:

---

Amal Shuq-Up said:

---

quash said:

---

Amal Shuq-Up said:

---

quash said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Amazing how the cult of Molech survives 3,000 years later.

---

There never was a cult of Mlk. It's a form of sacrifice, not a deity.

---

To what?

---

Your choice.

---

People burned their children in the fire to Molech. Molech was a specific deity worshipped by Canaanites. The grammar in the Bible makes it pretty clear. Despite the fact that your wikipedia research says that scholars have debated whether MLK referred to a type of sacrifice since 1935. I will trust the Bible. Its authorship was closer to the sacrifice to Molech and Canaanite culture than twentieth century scholars.

---

Lol, just because it on Wk doesn't mean your outdated reading of the KJV prevails.

"La" is the preposition you have wrong. Funny that Wiki doesn't mention that and I still know about it...

---

I don't read the KJV, but even if I did, it would not change the fact that (a) Moses knew a lot more about Canaanite culture and Molech than do your sources. And a plain English reading of the Bible notes that Molech was a particular deity to whom children were sacrificed.

Go strong, Wiki-Scholar.

Waco1947 said:

---

A pro-life position would require universal background checks and no ARs

---

another person that knows nothing about guns.. AR doesnt mean assault rifle.

Why only call out ArmaLite Rifles only?

Wangchung said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

A pro-life position would require universal background checks and no ARs

---

A pro life position would be to ban fatty foods and sugary drinks. A ban on knives, hammers, any blunt objects. A pro life position would be to cage every American in their very own cells and have the government feed clothe and control their actions every day with no physical human contact possible unless approved and closely monitored by the jai...sorry, compassionate government.

---

Thats a generalization to nonsense.
All those are regulated

Waco1947 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

A pro-life position would require universal background checks and no ARs

---

A pro life position would be to ban fatty foods and sugary drinks. A ban on knives, hammers, any blunt objects. A pro life position would be to cage every American in their very own cells and have the government feed clothe and control their actions every day with no physical human contact possible unless approved and closely monitored by the jai...sorry, compassionate government.

---

Thats a generalization to nonsense.
All those are regulated

---

But pro-life is about banning abortion, right? And your solution was banning guns you think look scary, right? So it stands that you believe bans of "bad" things are the solution.

Wangchung said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

A pro-life position would require universal background checks and no ARs

---

A pro life position would be to ban fatty foods and sugary drinks. A ban on knives, hammers, any blunt objects. A pro life position would be to cage every American in their very own cells and have the government feed clothe and control their actions every day with no physical human contact possible unless approved and closely monitored by the jai...sorry, compassionate government.

---

Thats a generalization to nonsense.
All those are regulated

---

But pro-life is about banning abortion, right? And your solution was banning guns you think look scary, right? So it stands that you believe bans of "bad" things are the solution.

---

Guns I think look scary? That's simply nonsense

Waco1947 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

A pro-life position would require universal background checks and no ARs

---

A pro life position would be to ban fatty foods and sugary drinks. A ban on knives, hammers, any blunt objects. A pro life position would be to cage every American in their very own cells and have the government feed clothe and control their actions every day with no physical human contact possible unless approved and closely monitored by the jai...sorry, compassionate government.

---

Thats a generalization to nonsense.
All those are regulated

---

But pro-life is about banning abortion, right? And your solution was banning guns you think look scary, right? So it stands that you believe bans of "bad" things are the solution.

---

Guns I think look scary? That's simply nonsense

---

Nonsense is desiring to ban a gun that isn't the most used in mass shootings or any shootings over all. So what is it that makes the weak AR so bad and not handguns, which are the culprit in the vast majority of murders, mass or otherwise? Is it the name you don't like?

Wangchung said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

A pro-life position would require universal background checks and no ARs

---

A pro life position would be to ban fatty foods and sugary drinks. A ban on knives, hammers, any blunt objects. A pro life position would be to cage every American in their very own cells and have the government feed clothe and control their actions every day with no physical human contact possible unless approved and closely monitored by the jai...sorry, compassionate government.

---

47 is not a human. No need to logic with it.

Wangchung said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

A pro-life position would require universal background checks and no ARs

---

A pro life position would be to ban fatty foods and sugary drinks. A ban on knives, hammers, any blunt objects. A pro life position would be to cage every American in their very own cells and have the government feed clothe and control their actions every day with no physical human contact possible unless approved and closely monitored by the jai...sorry, compassionate government.

---

Thats a generalization to nonsense.
All those are regulated

---

But pro-life is about banning abortion, right? And your solution was banning guns you think look scary, right? So it stands that you believe bans of "bad" things are the solution.

---

Guns I think look scary? That's simply nonsense

---

Nonsense is desiring to ban a gun that isn't the most used in mass shootings or any shootings over all. So what is it that makes the weak AR so bad and not handguns, which are the culprit in the vast majority of murders, mass or otherwise? Is it the name you don't like?

---

The magnitude of fire power. Keep your gun for personal protection just don't endanger the public with it by carrying it around.

Waco1947 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

A pro-life position would require universal background checks and no ARs

---

A pro life position would be to ban fatty foods and sugary drinks. A ban on knives, hammers, any blunt objects. A pro life position would be to cage every American in their very own cells and have the government feed clothe and control their actions every day with no physical human contact possible unless approved and closely monitored by the jai...sorry, compassionate government.

---

Thats a generalization to nonsense.
All those are regulated

---

But pro-life is about banning abortion, right? And your solution was banning guns you think look scary, right? So it stands that you believe bans of "bad" things are the solution.

---

Guns I think look scary? That's simply nonsense

---

Nonsense is desiring to ban a gun that isn't the most used in mass shootings or any shootings over all. So what is it that makes the weak AR so bad and not handguns, which are the culprit in the vast majority of murders, mass or otherwise? Is it the name you don't like?

---

The magnitude of fire power. Keep your gun for personal protection just don't endanger the public with it by carrying it around.

---

My gun does me no good for self defense when it's in my home and I am not, but specifically when referencing the AR, this solution would not have prevented the attack. At least with a long gun it cannot be concealed. If he had walked in with hidden pistols we get the same death count or worse without the forewarning.( as little as that forewarning was)

Waco1947 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

A pro-life position would require universal background checks and no ARs

---

A pro life position would be to ban fatty foods and sugary drinks. A ban on knives, hammers, any blunt objects. A pro life position would be to cage every American in their very own cells and have the government feed clothe and control their actions every day with no physical human contact possible unless approved and closely monitored by the jai...sorry, compassionate government.

---

Thats a generalization to nonsense.
All those are regulated

---

But pro-life is about banning abortion, right? And your solution was banning guns you think look scary, right? So it stands that you believe bans of "bad" things are the solution.

---

Guns I think look scary? That's simply nonsense

---

Nonsense is desiring to ban a gun that isn't the most used in mass shootings or any shootings over all. So what is it that makes the weak AR so bad and not handguns, which are the culprit in the vast majority of murders, mass or otherwise? Is it the name you don't like?

---

The magnitude of fire power. Keep your gun for personal protection just don't endanger the public with it by carrying it around.

---

Same could be said for your baby blenders.

Waco1947 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

A pro-life position would require universal background checks and no ARs

---

A pro life position would be to ban fatty foods and sugary drinks. A ban on knives, hammers, any blunt objects. A pro life position would be to cage every American in their very own cells and have the government feed clothe and control their actions every day with no physical human contact possible unless approved and closely monitored by the jai...sorry, compassionate government.

---

Thats a generalization to nonsense.
All those are regulated

---

But pro-life is about banning abortion, right? And your solution was banning guns you think look scary, right? So it stands that you believe bans of "bad" things are the solution.

---

Guns I think look scary? That's simply nonsense

---

Nonsense is desiring to ban a gun that isn't the most used in mass shootings or any shootings over all. So what is it that makes the weak AR so bad and not handguns, which are the culprit in the vast majority of murders, mass or otherwise? Is it the name you don't like?

---

The magnitude of fire power. Keep your gun for personal protection just don't endanger the public with it by carrying it around.

---

Waco, denying innocent people the right to protect themselves and others won't stop even one criminal or malicious actor from using a gun.

Amal Shuq-Up said:

---

quash said:

---

Amal Shuq-Up said:

---

quash said:

---

Amal Shuq-Up said:

---

quash said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Amazing how the cult of Molech survives 3,000 years later.

---

There never was a cult of Mlk. It's a form of sacrifice, not a deity.

---

To what?

---

Your choice.

---

People burned their children in the fire to Molech. Molech was a specific deity worshipped by Canaanites. The grammar in the Bible makes it pretty clear. Despite the fact that your wikipedia research says that scholars have debated whether MLK referred to a type of sacrifice since 1935. I will trust the Bible. Its authorship was closer to the sacrifice to Molech and Canaanite culture than twentieth century scholars.

---

Lol, just because it on Wk doesn't mean your outdated reading of the KJV prevails.

"La" is the preposition you have wrong. Funny that Wiki doesn't mention that and I still know about it...

---

I don't read the KJV, but even if I did, it would not change the fact that (a) Moses knew a lot more about Canaanite culture and Molech than do your sources. And a plain English reading of the Bible notes that Molech was a particular deity to whom children were sacrificed.

Go strong, Wiki-Scholar.

---

A plain English reading? Lulz.

You know the bible was written before even Middle English was a thing, right?

The last five decades of scholarship have increased our understanding of what the primary sources meant. Sacrifice, not a deity

quash said:

---

Amal Shuq-Up said:

---

quash said:

---

Amal Shuq-Up said:

---

quash said:

---

Amal Shuq-Up said:

---

quash said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Amazing how the cult of Molech survives 3,000 years later.

---

There never was a cult of Mlk. It's a form of sacrifice, not a deity.

---

To what?

---

Your choice.

---

People burned their children in the fire to Molech. Molech was a specific deity worshipped by Canaanites. The grammar in the Bible makes it pretty clear. Despite the fact that your wikipedia research says that scholars have debated whether MLK referred to a type of sacrifice since 1935. I will trust the Bible. Its authorship was closer to the sacrifice to Molech and Canaanite culture than twentieth century scholars.

---

Lol, just because it on Wk doesn't mean your outdated reading of the KJV prevails.

"La" is the preposition you have wrong. Funny that Wiki doesn't mention that and I still know about it...

---

I don't read the KJV, but even if I did, it would not change the fact that (a) Moses knew a lot more about Canaanite culture and Molech than do your sources. And a plain English reading of the Bible notes that Molech was a particular deity to whom children were sacrificed.

Go strong, Wiki-Scholar.

---

A plain English reading? Lulz.

You know the bible was written before even Middle English was a thing, right?

The last five decades of scholarship have increased our understanding of what the primary sources meant. Sacrifice, not a deity

---

I like my information about the Old Testament to come from non-atheists.

Amal Shuq-Up said:

---

quash said:

---

Amal Shuq-Up said:

---

quash said:

---

Amal Shuq-Up said:

---

quash said:

---

Amal Shuq-Up said:

---

quash said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Amazing how the cult of Molech survives 3,000 years later.

---

There never was a cult of Mlk. It's a form of sacrifice, not a deity.

---

To what?

---

Your choice.

---

People burned their children in the fire to Molech. Molech was a specific deity worshipped by Canaanites. The grammar in the Bible makes it pretty clear. Despite the fact that your wikipedia research says that scholars have debated whether MLK referred to a type of sacrifice since 1935. I will trust the Bible. Its authorship was closer to the sacrifice to Molech and Canaanite culture than twentieth century scholars.

---

Lol, just because it on Wk doesn't mean your outdated reading of the KJV prevails.

"La" is the preposition you have wrong. Funny that Wiki doesn't mention that and I still know about it...

---

I don't read the KJV, but even if I did, it would not change the fact that (a) Moses knew a lot more about Canaanite culture and Molech than do your sources. And a plain English reading of the Bible notes that Molech was a particular deity to whom children were sacrificed.

Go strong, Wiki-Scholar.

---

A plain English reading? Lulz.

You know the bible was written before even Middle English was a thing, right?

The last five decades of scholarship have increased our understanding of what the primary sources meant. Sacrifice, not a deity

---

I like my information about the Old Testament to come from non-atheists.

---

Ah, then you're welcome.

quash said:

---

Amal Shuq-Up said:

---

quash said:

---

Amal Shuq-Up said:

---

quash said:

---

Amal Shuq-Up said:

---

quash said:

---

Amal Shuq-Up said:

---

quash said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Amazing how the cult of Molech survives 3,000 years later.

---

There never was a cult of Mlk. It's a form of sacrifice, not a deity.

---

To what?

---

Your choice.

---

People burned their children in the fire to Molech. Molech was a specific deity worshipped by Canaanites. The grammar in the Bible makes it pretty clear. Despite the fact that your wikipedia research says that scholars have debated whether MLK referred to a type of sacrifice since 1935. I will trust the Bible. Its authorship was closer to the sacrifice to Molech and Canaanite culture than twentieth century scholars.

---

Lol, just because it on Wk doesn't mean your outdated reading of the KJV prevails.

"La" is the preposition you have wrong. Funny that Wiki doesn't mention that and I still know about it...

---

I don't read the KJV, but even if I did, it would not change the fact that (a) Moses knew a lot more about Canaanite culture and Molech than do your sources. And a plain English reading of the Bible notes that Molech was a particular deity to whom children were sacrificed.

Go strong, Wiki-Scholar.

---

A plain English reading? Lulz.

You know the bible was written before even Middle English was a thing, right?

The last five decades of scholarship have increased our understanding of what the primary sources meant. Sacrifice, not a deity

---

I like my information about the Old Testament to come from non-atheists.

---

Ah, then you're welcome.

---

When did you stop believing in the great [void]?

Latest poll on Abortion views / Roe v. Wade

Notes from the pollster

"Most voters don't know what Roe even does.

Among those who claim to oppose overturning Roe, 32.5% oppose abortion after heartbeat, 47.2% in 2nd TRI, and 62.8% in 3rd TRI.

Men are more likely than women to support abortion."