Global decline in fertility rates…

18,090 Views | 276 Replies | Last: 13 days ago by Redbrickbear
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Golem said:

contrario said:

Why must the population sustain itself? Why would it be a bad thing for there to be less people?


There won't be less people. There will be less intelligent people.
...trying to maintain national infrastuctures designed for a larger population. Roads, bridges, water systems, sewer systems, electrical grids, etc....all have maintenance costs. And they all have a service life. quite a burden for 80m people to pay those maintenance costs, plus replacement costs, plus technological upgrades to infrastructures designed for 100m people.

there is a reason why we archeologists have abandoned cities to study.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Golem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:


Having traveled to/through Africa a few dozen times, spanning 10 countries, including that stretch, I can tell you that population growth there is not going to be good news. They are not dealing well with their existing population numbers and they will only start illegally exporting their problem children to the west in ever larger numbers.

There are really only two places in Africa that I've visited that were broadly clean and well run - Rwanda and Namibia. West Africa (the area in the article) is a huge hell hole filled with rampant corruption and terrorism. More of the same is not going to make the world a better place.
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Golem said:

Redbrickbear said:


Having traveled to/through Africa a few dozen times, spanning 10 countries, including that stretch, I can tell you that population growth there is not going to be good news. They are not dealing well with their existing population numbers and they will only start illegally exporting their problem children to the west in ever larger numbers.

There are really only two places in Africa that I've visited that were broadly clean and well run - Rwanda and Namibia. West Africa (the area in the article) is a huge hell hole filled with rampant corruption and terrorism. More of the same is not going to make the world a better place.
What is the answer ?
Golem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canada2017 said:

Golem said:

Redbrickbear said:


Having traveled to/through Africa a few dozen times, spanning 10 countries, including that stretch, I can tell you that population growth there is not going to be good news. They are not dealing well with their existing population numbers and they will only start illegally exporting their problem children to the west in ever larger numbers.

There are really only two places in Africa that I've visited that were broadly clean and well run - Rwanda and Namibia. West Africa (the area in the article) is a huge hell hole filled with rampant corruption and terrorism. More of the same is not going to make the world a better place.
What is the answer ?
To population growth? Probably isn't one. We simply need to keep them from coming to the west and exporting the abortion that is African culture, writ large.

We will obviously need to step up the soft power angle to key countries on the continent. That means cash to places with strategic ports and strategic rare earth minerals. Otherwise, we should step down aid to the rest of the continent and let them figure out how to make their countries run like grown ups. They have near year long growing seasons in most of subsaharan Africa. They should be able to figure out how to feed themselves without our help. If they can't, the population growth will slow down.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Golem said:

Redbrickbear said:


Having traveled to/through Africa a few dozen times, spanning 10 countries, including that stretch, I can tell you that population growth there is not going to be good news. They are not dealing well with their existing population numbers and they will only start illegally exporting their problem children to the west in ever larger numbers.

There are really only two places in Africa that I've visited that were broadly clean and well run - Rwanda and Namibia. West Africa (the area in the article) is a huge hell hole filled with rampant corruption and terrorism. More of the same is not going to make the world a better place.



Interesting that many Black Americans are from that West African area.


whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Golem said:

Canada2017 said:

Golem said:

Redbrickbear said:


Having traveled to/through Africa a few dozen times, spanning 10 countries, including that stretch, I can tell you that population growth there is not going to be good news. They are not dealing well with their existing population numbers and they will only start illegally exporting their problem children to the west in ever larger numbers.

There are really only two places in Africa that I've visited that were broadly clean and well run - Rwanda and Namibia. West Africa (the area in the article) is a huge hell hole filled with rampant corruption and terrorism. More of the same is not going to make the world a better place.
What is the answer ?
To population growth? Probably isn't one. We simply need to keep them from coming to the west and exporting the abortion that is African culture, writ large.

We will obviously need to step up the soft power angle to key countries on the continent. That means cash to places with strategic ports and strategic rare earth minerals. Otherwise, we should step down aid to the rest of the continent and let them figure out how to make their countries run like grown ups. They have near year long growing seasons in most of subsaharan Africa. They should be able to figure out how to feed themselves without our help. If they can't, the population growth will slow down.


Africa is also expected to be the focal point for global economic growth the next several decades. And prosperity inevitably lowers reproductive rates. Basically, AF is where China was 50 years ago.

Time will fix it…..
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Golem said:

Canada2017 said:

Golem said:

Redbrickbear said:


Having traveled to/through Africa a few dozen times, spanning 10 countries, including that stretch, I can tell you that population growth there is not going to be good news. They are not dealing well with their existing population numbers and they will only start illegally exporting their problem children to the west in ever larger numbers.

There are really only two places in Africa that I've visited that were broadly clean and well run - Rwanda and Namibia. West Africa (the area in the article) is a huge hell hole filled with rampant corruption and terrorism. More of the same is not going to make the world a better place.
What is the answer ?
To population growth? Probably isn't one. We simply need to keep them from coming to the west and exporting the abortion that is African culture, writ large.

We will obviously need to step up the soft power angle to key countries on the continent. That means cash to places with strategic ports and strategic rare earth minerals. Otherwise, we should step down aid to the rest of the continent and let them figure out how to make their countries run like grown ups. They have near year long growing seasons in most of subsaharan Africa. They should be able to figure out how to feed themselves without our help. If they can't, the population growth will slow down.


Africa is also expected to be the focal point for global economic growth the next several decades. And prosperity inevitably lowers reproductive rates. Basically, AF is where China was 50 years ago.

Time will fix it…..
Income does lower fertility eventually... that is true.

But lets not forget that China lowered theirs in such a fast way by having a dictatorial communist party pass a 1 child law.

And enforced it brutality. That is how they went from 6.5 kids per woman in 1968 to 2.5 kids in 1983

https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/CHN/china/fertility-rate

That will not happen in Sub-Saharan Africa in that way.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Golem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Golem said:

Canada2017 said:

Golem said:

Redbrickbear said:


Having traveled to/through Africa a few dozen times, spanning 10 countries, including that stretch, I can tell you that population growth there is not going to be good news. They are not dealing well with their existing population numbers and they will only start illegally exporting their problem children to the west in ever larger numbers.

There are really only two places in Africa that I've visited that were broadly clean and well run - Rwanda and Namibia. West Africa (the area in the article) is a huge hell hole filled with rampant corruption and terrorism. More of the same is not going to make the world a better place.
What is the answer ?
To population growth? Probably isn't one. We simply need to keep them from coming to the west and exporting the abortion that is African culture, writ large.

We will obviously need to step up the soft power angle to key countries on the continent. That means cash to places with strategic ports and strategic rare earth minerals. Otherwise, we should step down aid to the rest of the continent and let them figure out how to make their countries run like grown ups. They have near year long growing seasons in most of subsaharan Africa. They should be able to figure out how to feed themselves without our help. If they can't, the population growth will slow down.


Africa is also expected to be the focal point for global economic growth the next several decades. And prosperity inevitably lowers reproductive rates. Basically, AF is where China was 50 years ago.

Time will fix it…..


Disagree. The most advanced nation on the continent (formerly at least) is being sucked dry by the ANC and rampant corruption and racism. It's going the way of Zim. Was in Cape Town last month and the townships seem to be creeping into the town proper.

The vast majority of the rest of Subsaharan Africa is awash in tribalism (feeding more corruption) and regional sectarian violence. I've missed two terrorist attacks by a matter of weeks (Nairobi westlands mall and the Raddison in Bamako). Shopped at the first and stayed at the second.

I deal with a lot of African technical experts and the bulk of them are so enamored with titles and rank that competence seems an afterthought…which shows. The only real technical competence in the continent, it seems, is imported…right now from China.

No, that continent is not going to grow like China…at least not economically. Not without a vast military takeover by some more advanced civilization. I'm afraid it's just going to continue to produce raw materials, rampant corruption and communicable diseases.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:


good link
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Golem said:

whiterock said:

Golem said:

Canada2017 said:

Golem said:

Redbrickbear said:


Having traveled to/through Africa a few dozen times, spanning 10 countries, including that stretch, I can tell you that population growth there is not going to be good news. They are not dealing well with their existing population numbers and they will only start illegally exporting their problem children to the west in ever larger numbers.

There are really only two places in Africa that I've visited that were broadly clean and well run - Rwanda and Namibia. West Africa (the area in the article) is a huge hell hole filled with rampant corruption and terrorism. More of the same is not going to make the world a better place.
What is the answer ?
To population growth? Probably isn't one. We simply need to keep them from coming to the west and exporting the abortion that is African culture, writ large.

We will obviously need to step up the soft power angle to key countries on the continent. That means cash to places with strategic ports and strategic rare earth minerals. Otherwise, we should step down aid to the rest of the continent and let them figure out how to make their countries run like grown ups. They have near year long growing seasons in most of subsaharan Africa. They should be able to figure out how to feed themselves without our help. If they can't, the population growth will slow down.


Africa is also expected to be the focal point for global economic growth the next several decades. And prosperity inevitably lowers reproductive rates. Basically, AF is where China was 50 years ago.

Time will fix it…..


Disagree. The most advanced nation on the continent (formerly at least) is being sucked dry by the ANC and rampant corruption and racism. It's going the way of Zim. Was in Cape Town last month and the townships seem to be creeping into the town proper.

The vast majority of the rest of Subsaharan Africa is awash in tribalism (feeding more corruption) and regional sectarian violence. I've missed two terrorist attacks by a matter of weeks (Nairobi westlands mall and the Raddison in Bamako). Shopped at the first and stayed at the second.

I deal with a lot of African technical experts and the bulk of them are so enamored with titles and rank that competence seems an afterthought…which shows. The only real technical competence in the continent, it seems, is imported…right now from China.

No, that continent is not going to grow like China…at least not economically. Not without a vast military takeover by some more advanced civilization. I'm afraid it's just going to continue to produce raw materials, rampant corruption and communicable diseases.
Thanks for the info.

Yet people who have never been overseas ( unless in an all inclusive resort ) much less to that part of Africa will dismiss what you have observed and experienced.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:


good link
Zeihan is excellent. Those demographic charts are straight out of macro trade class.

He's got a couple on the connection of globalism to the Cold War are about 90% identical to a speech I used to give to GOP groups, with WAY better graphics.

He does a better job than anyone I have seen at explaining the macro forces driving the tectonic plates of world affairs. The timing may be off by a decade or more...the exact direction things slip/jump may differ in matters of degree, but the basic direction of where things are going to go is pretty much foreordained. If you understand the forces at play, no movement surprises; it's only if you don't understand the forces at play that you get caught unprepared.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canada2017 said:

Golem said:

whiterock said:

Golem said:

Canada2017 said:

Golem said:

Redbrickbear said:


Having traveled to/through Africa a few dozen times, spanning 10 countries, including that stretch, I can tell you that population growth there is not going to be good news. They are not dealing well with their existing population numbers and they will only start illegally exporting their problem children to the west in ever larger numbers.

There are really only two places in Africa that I've visited that were broadly clean and well run - Rwanda and Namibia. West Africa (the area in the article) is a huge hell hole filled with rampant corruption and terrorism. More of the same is not going to make the world a better place.
What is the answer ?
To population growth? Probably isn't one. We simply need to keep them from coming to the west and exporting the abortion that is African culture, writ large.

We will obviously need to step up the soft power angle to key countries on the continent. That means cash to places with strategic ports and strategic rare earth minerals. Otherwise, we should step down aid to the rest of the continent and let them figure out how to make their countries run like grown ups. They have near year long growing seasons in most of subsaharan Africa. They should be able to figure out how to feed themselves without our help. If they can't, the population growth will slow down.


Africa is also expected to be the focal point for global economic growth the next several decades. And prosperity inevitably lowers reproductive rates. Basically, AF is where China was 50 years ago.

Time will fix it…..


Disagree. The most advanced nation on the continent (formerly at least) is being sucked dry by the ANC and rampant corruption and racism. It's going the way of Zim. Was in Cape Town last month and the townships seem to be creeping into the town proper.

The vast majority of the rest of Subsaharan Africa is awash in tribalism (feeding more corruption) and regional sectarian violence. I've missed two terrorist attacks by a matter of weeks (Nairobi westlands mall and the Raddison in Bamako). Shopped at the first and stayed at the second.

I deal with a lot of African technical experts and the bulk of them are so enamored with titles and rank that competence seems an afterthought…which shows. The only real technical competence in the continent, it seems, is imported…right now from China.

No, that continent is not going to grow like China…at least not economically. Not without a vast military takeover by some more advanced civilization. I'm afraid it's just going to continue to produce raw materials, rampant corruption and communicable diseases.
Thanks for the info.

Yet people who have never been overseas ( unless in an all inclusive resort ) much less to that part of Africa will dismiss what you have observed and experienced.
I lived in AF for 8 years in three different countries. None of Golem's observations are inconsistent with those I could share, except mine would be more lurid. At independence, a many African countries found themselves unable to staff agencies below the rank of cabinet minister with people who had college degrees. Perhaps the biggest progress is that nearly all the AF countries have learned (mostly the hard way) that communism and socialism are not good models for the future. They tend to understand that capital formation and a functioning private sector is a requirement. (that is not to say Singapore they will become....)

But none of that is what's going to drive AF to be a major engine of growth for the world economy. It's the kind of "tectonic plate" issues that I mentioned above: AF is laden with resources and gifted with an advantageous position in world trade. More importantly.....demographics. As noted above, the AF population is going to grow substantially for several decades - and population growth is the largest part of economic growth. Technology and resulting productivity gains matter, but it's people that drive growth. And that will occur within the context of the developed world dealing with bad demographics and structural realignments of their economies to slower growth models (see Japan).

AF indeed may not be able to exploit their resources as well as China. But their growth will accelerate and likely outstrip that of much of the rest of the world. And they will have help. How will Chinese companies deal with the growing shortages/increased costs of labor in China? Some will move operations to Africa..... It will not be circuit boards. It will be simple things. And capabilities will grow over time. Some of us here remember days when the phrase "Made In Japan" was synonymous with "shoddy quality".........

America is in great shape, too. We are blessed by geography in ways no other nation is, so much so that we almost cannot screw it up.

Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:


good link
Zeihan is excellent. Those demographic charts are straight out of macro trade class.

He's got a couple on the connection of globalism to the Cold War are about 90% identical to a speech I used to give to GOP groups, with WAY better graphics.

He does a better job than anyone I have seen at explaining the macro forces driving the tectonic plates of world affairs. The timing may be off by a decade or more...the exact direction things slip/jump may differ in matters of degree, but the basic direction of where things are going to go is pretty much foreordained. If you understand the forces at play, no movement surprises; it's only if you don't understand the forces at play that you get caught unprepared.


Thanks. I'll look
Golem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canada2017 said:

Golem said:

whiterock said:

Golem said:

Canada2017 said:

Golem said:

Redbrickbear said:


Having traveled to/through Africa a few dozen times, spanning 10 countries, including that stretch, I can tell you that population growth there is not going to be good news. They are not dealing well with their existing population numbers and they will only start illegally exporting their problem children to the west in ever larger numbers.

There are really only two places in Africa that I've visited that were broadly clean and well run - Rwanda and Namibia. West Africa (the area in the article) is a huge hell hole filled with rampant corruption and terrorism. More of the same is not going to make the world a better place.
What is the answer ?
To population growth? Probably isn't one. We simply need to keep them from coming to the west and exporting the abortion that is African culture, writ large.

We will obviously need to step up the soft power angle to key countries on the continent. That means cash to places with strategic ports and strategic rare earth minerals. Otherwise, we should step down aid to the rest of the continent and let them figure out how to make their countries run like grown ups. They have near year long growing seasons in most of subsaharan Africa. They should be able to figure out how to feed themselves without our help. If they can't, the population growth will slow down.


Africa is also expected to be the focal point for global economic growth the next several decades. And prosperity inevitably lowers reproductive rates. Basically, AF is where China was 50 years ago.

Time will fix it…..


Disagree. The most advanced nation on the continent (formerly at least) is being sucked dry by the ANC and rampant corruption and racism. It's going the way of Zim. Was in Cape Town last month and the townships seem to be creeping into the town proper.

The vast majority of the rest of Subsaharan Africa is awash in tribalism (feeding more corruption) and regional sectarian violence. I've missed two terrorist attacks by a matter of weeks (Nairobi westlands mall and the Raddison in Bamako). Shopped at the first and stayed at the second.

I deal with a lot of African technical experts and the bulk of them are so enamored with titles and rank that competence seems an afterthought…which shows. The only real technical competence in the continent, it seems, is imported…right now from China.

No, that continent is not going to grow like China…at least not economically. Not without a vast military takeover by some more advanced civilization. I'm afraid it's just going to continue to produce raw materials, rampant corruption and communicable diseases.
Thanks for the info.

Yet people who have never been overseas ( unless in an all inclusive resort ) much less to that part of Africa will dismiss what you have observed and experienced.


White rock certainly has a well informed take. I would not dismiss it. I just see things a little more bleakly than he does. There's been no real notable pan-African technology advancements or real attempts at creating a climate for them. There's very little respect for institutions. Indeed, they are largely seen as a hub for financial inputs that can be easily turned into financial graft if you can be well placed enough.

Africa won't ever be on par with the west because they just don't have the culture to allow it. They'll fight, fleece and fornicate like no other continent on earth, but they will never flourish.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
C. Jordan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's complex. There are no simple answers.

I've been to Africa 3 times (Mozambique and Kenya) in the last 5 years and can testify that there are lots and lots of young people there. But I can also testify that it doesn't translate to economic prosperity. There's also lots and lots of poverty, with little hope of people escaping it.

It kind of reminds me of the US in the 1950s and '60s. A time of movement from rural areas to cities and rapid development. However, unlike the US, there aren't many good jobs awaiting those who move from rural areas to urban ones.

I do think that education and economics play a large role in birthrates. It's counterintuitive, but I've seen studies that poorer people tend to have more children because of fear of losing those who are born. Infant mortality is still a huge problem.

On the other hand, our concerns back in the 1960s and '70s for overpopulation in the US seem to have been misplaced. Still, having children is an expensive proposition.

Back to Africa, where the jobs and resources (even water) are going to come from for all these young people is still a mystery. My concern is that even greater political instability is coming.
C. Jordan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Golem said:

Redbrickbear said:


Having traveled to/through Africa a few dozen times, spanning 10 countries, including that stretch, I can tell you that population growth there is not going to be good news. They are not dealing well with their existing population numbers and they will only start illegally exporting their problem children to the west in ever larger numbers.

There are really only two places in Africa that I've visited that were broadly clean and well run - Rwanda and Namibia. West Africa (the area in the article) is a huge hell hole filled with rampant corruption and terrorism. More of the same is not going to make the world a better place.
Hey. We actually agree on something!

Parts of Kenya are pretty good.

I don't know about illegally exporting children, because my observation is that family ties are stronger there than they are here.

But I agree that politic instability is likely.

You've probably also observed that China is investing heavily in the region. They're broadening their sphere of influence there, which is unlikely to be good for us.

I know you dislike Biden, but unlike other recent presidents, Democrat and Republican, he sees we need to get engaged there economically.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:


good link
Zeihan is excellent. Those demographic charts are straight out of macro trade class.

He's got a couple on the connection of globalism to the Cold War are about 90% identical to a speech I used to give to GOP groups, with WAY better graphics.

He does a better job than anyone I have seen at explaining the macro forces driving the tectonic plates of world affairs. The timing may be off by a decade or more...the exact direction things slip/jump may differ in matters of degree, but the basic direction of where things are going to go is pretty much foreordained. If you understand the forces at play, no movement surprises; it's only if you don't understand the forces at play that you get caught unprepared.
Just ordered:
    The End of the World Is Just the Beginning - Mapping the Collapse of Globalization
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
C. Jordan said:

It's complex. There are no simple answers.

I've been to Africa 3 times (Mozambique and Kenya) in the last 5 years and can testify that there are lots and lots of young people there. But I can also testify that it doesn't translate to economic prosperity. There's also lots and lots of poverty, with little hope of people escaping it.

It kind of reminds me of the US in the 1950s and '60s. A time of movement from rural areas to cities and rapid development. However, unlike the US, there aren't many good jobs awaiting those who move from rural areas to urban ones.

I do think that education and economics play a large role in birthrates. It's counterintuitive, but I've seen studies that poorer people tend to have more children because of fear of losing those who are born. Infant mortality is still a huge problem.

On the other hand, our concerns back in the 1960s and '70s for overpopulation in the US seem to have been misplaced. Still, having children is an expensive proposition.

Back to Africa, where the jobs and resources (even water) are going to come from for all these young people is still a mystery. My concern is that even greater political instability is coming.



USA had already urbanized by the 1950s and 1960s.

In fact our industrialization and urbanization era was Between 1880 and 1929.

And we were not working with sub 80 average IQ levels.



whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

C. Jordan said:

It's complex. There are no simple answers.

I've been to Africa 3 times (Mozambique and Kenya) in the last 5 years and can testify that there are lots and lots of young people there. But I can also testify that it doesn't translate to economic prosperity. There's also lots and lots of poverty, with little hope of people escaping it.

It kind of reminds me of the US in the 1950s and '60s. A time of movement from rural areas to cities and rapid development. However, unlike the US, there aren't many good jobs awaiting those who move from rural areas to urban ones.

I do think that education and economics play a large role in birthrates. It's counterintuitive, but I've seen studies that poorer people tend to have more children because of fear of losing those who are born. Infant mortality is still a huge problem.

On the other hand, our concerns back in the 1960s and '70s for overpopulation in the US seem to have been misplaced. Still, having children is an expensive proposition.

Back to Africa, where the jobs and resources (even water) are going to come from for all these young people is still a mystery. My concern is that even greater political instability is coming.



USA had already urbanized by the 1950s and 1960s.

In fact our industrialization and urbanization era was Between 1880 and 1929.

And we were not working with sub 80 average IQ levels.





Went out one Saturday to the farm of a Zim hunting buddy named John Worsley Worswick for vespers & braai. His house was picturesque on a high approach to a kopje on the backside of his 1700ac property. The road in meandered thru his cultivated fields. As I drive in, I noticed out in the middle of one of his fields a long line of women, stooped over shoulder to shoulder all the way from one side of the field to the other. When I asked why, he said he paid them to pick weed sprouts. I asked she he didn't just plow them under. (He had a large late-model green & yellow behemoth). He explained that the decomposition of the weeds would consume nitrogen in the soil, requiring extra fertilizer, which was scarce and expensive. Plus, it put money into the local economy which helped his equity with electeds.

Excess labor…..doesn't take a 3-digit IQ to do manual labor, or run a piece of heavy equipment in an iron ore mine, work on the floor if a steel mill, etc…. It's excess labor. Add capital, training, mgmt supervision, etc….. there's more resource available than it might appear. It's not like environmental regulations or social justice nonsense are going to add a lot to the cost structure, either…..
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

C. Jordan said:

It's complex. There are no simple answers.

I've been to Africa 3 times (Mozambique and Kenya) in the last 5 years and can testify that there are lots and lots of young people there. But I can also testify that it doesn't translate to economic prosperity. There's also lots and lots of poverty, with little hope of people escaping it.

It kind of reminds me of the US in the 1950s and '60s. A time of movement from rural areas to cities and rapid development. However, unlike the US, there aren't many good jobs awaiting those who move from rural areas to urban ones.

I do think that education and economics play a large role in birthrates. It's counterintuitive, but I've seen studies that poorer people tend to have more children because of fear of losing those who are born. Infant mortality is still a huge problem.

On the other hand, our concerns back in the 1960s and '70s for overpopulation in the US seem to have been misplaced. Still, having children is an expensive proposition.

Back to Africa, where the jobs and resources (even water) are going to come from for all these young people is still a mystery. My concern is that even greater political instability is coming.



USA had already urbanized by the 1950s and 1960s.

In fact our industrialization and urbanization era was Between 1880 and 1929.

And we were not working with sub 80 average IQ levels.




Is there a link for the map of African IQs?
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:


good link
Zeihan is excellent. Those demographic charts are straight out of macro trade class.

He's got a couple on the connection of globalism to the Cold War are about 90% identical to a speech I used to give to GOP groups, with WAY better graphics.

He does a better job than anyone I have seen at explaining the macro forces driving the tectonic plates of world affairs. The timing may be off by a decade or more...the exact direction things slip/jump may differ in matters of degree, but the basic direction of where things are going to go is pretty much foreordained. If you understand the forces at play, no movement surprises; it's only if you don't understand the forces at play that you get caught unprepared.
This is excellent. I'm about 1/3 of the way through.

Highly recommend
    The End of the World Is Just the Beginning - Mapping the Collapse of Globalization
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:

C. Jordan said:

It's complex. There are no simple answers.

I've been to Africa 3 times (Mozambique and Kenya) in the last 5 years and can testify that there are lots and lots of young people there. But I can also testify that it doesn't translate to economic prosperity. There's also lots and lots of poverty, with little hope of people escaping it.

It kind of reminds me of the US in the 1950s and '60s. A time of movement from rural areas to cities and rapid development. However, unlike the US, there aren't many good jobs awaiting those who move from rural areas to urban ones.

I do think that education and economics play a large role in birthrates. It's counterintuitive, but I've seen studies that poorer people tend to have more children because of fear of losing those who are born. Infant mortality is still a huge problem.

On the other hand, our concerns back in the 1960s and '70s for overpopulation in the US seem to have been misplaced. Still, having children is an expensive proposition.

Back to Africa, where the jobs and resources (even water) are going to come from for all these young people is still a mystery. My concern is that even greater political instability is coming.



USA had already urbanized by the 1950s and 1960s.

In fact our industrialization and urbanization era was Between 1880 and 1929.

And we were not working with sub 80 average IQ levels.




Is there a link for the map of African IQs?



Call Prof. Satoshi Kanazawa for those links:

[The London School of Economics is embroiled in a row over academic freedom after one of its lecturers published a paper alleging that African states were poor and suffered chronic ill-health because their populations were less intelligent than people in richer countries.
Satoshi Kanazawa, an evolutionary psychologist…publishing the research which concludes that low IQ levels, rather than poverty and disease, are the reason why life expectancy is low and infant mortality high. His paper, published in the British Journal of Health Psychology, compares IQ scores with indicators of ill health in 126 countries and claims that nations at the top of the ill health league also have the lowest intelligence ratings.]
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Osodecentx said:

Redbrickbear said:

C. Jordan said:

It's complex. There are no simple answers.

I've been to Africa 3 times (Mozambique and Kenya) in the last 5 years and can testify that there are lots and lots of young people there. But I can also testify that it doesn't translate to economic prosperity. There's also lots and lots of poverty, with little hope of people escaping it.

It kind of reminds me of the US in the 1950s and '60s. A time of movement from rural areas to cities and rapid development. However, unlike the US, there aren't many good jobs awaiting those who move from rural areas to urban ones.

I do think that education and economics play a large role in birthrates. It's counterintuitive, but I've seen studies that poorer people tend to have more children because of fear of losing those who are born. Infant mortality is still a huge problem.

On the other hand, our concerns back in the 1960s and '70s for overpopulation in the US seem to have been misplaced. Still, having children is an expensive proposition.

Back to Africa, where the jobs and resources (even water) are going to come from for all these young people is still a mystery. My concern is that even greater political instability is coming.



USA had already urbanized by the 1950s and 1960s.

In fact our industrialization and urbanization era was Between 1880 and 1929.

And we were not working with sub 80 average IQ levels.




Is there a link for the map of African IQs?



Call Prof. Satoshi Kanazawa for those links:

[The London School of Economics is embroiled in a row over academic freedom after one of its lecturers published a paper alleging that African states were poor and suffered chronic ill-health because their populations were less intelligent than people in richer countries.
Satoshi Kanazawa, an evolutionary psychologist…publishing the research which concludes that low IQ levels, rather than poverty and disease, are the reason why life expectancy is low and infant mortality high. His paper, published in the British Journal of Health Psychology, compares IQ scores with indicators of ill health in 126 countries and claims that nations at the top of the ill health league also have the lowest intelligence ratings.]
I remember the kids in Monrovia. if you stood still, they're be three or more trying to shine your shoes. You could not park downtown without a half dozen wanting to come wash your car Sometimes they'd come over at a stoplight and start wiping your windshield with their dirty shirttails. in better circumstances, you'd see them working in the garden, helping the women prepare & cook meals on open fires in the palaver huts in front of the houses, sweeping the dirt around the house to keep the litter at bay... etc..... (keeping the dirt clean was important, as litter brought bugs & rats, and bugs & rats brought cobras & mambas.) The one thing you almost never saw? A girl playing with a doll, pretending to have conversations with it, fussing over what to dress it with next. A boy rolling a Tonka truck around to build some imaginary structure. Any kid reading a book. LIfe was hard. And kids had to start pulling their share of the load as soon as they started talking. I thought at the time that robbing a kid of a childhood among many other things diminished their ability to imagine and aspire. Their world got small and hard from the outset.

Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?




Golem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:






I would submit that it's the "family with kids" aspect that made them wealthy rather than the converse.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

I wonder how mortality rates affect the African population where fertility rates are so high.


Well before modern medicine and sanitation families would expect to lose a child or two. I would expect the less developed nations to mirror those rates approximately.

https://ourworldindata.org/child-mortality-in-the-past
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Golem said:

Redbrickbear said:






I would submit that it's the "family with kids" aspect that made them wealthy rather than the converse.


I would question that it is a positive that women from 18-22 are having less children and over 40 are having more. Not a biologist, but wasn't human body designed to handle child birth better in younger years than over 40, both for woman and baby? Maybe I am wrong?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.