Global decline in fertility rates…

18,451 Views | 280 Replies | Last: 7 hrs ago by whiterock
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
but we don't need to worry about the birth rate because we have people pouring across the southern border.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://x.com/richardhanania/status/1692766773911634150?s=46&t=M0bDAyo9sOCd-LdXt_rpmA
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://x.com/indian_bronson/status/1693431736082776550?s=46&t=M0bDAyo9sOCd-LdXt_rpmA





Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Too Rich And Comfortable To Want Kids
The Wall Street Journal reports that hospitals nationwide are shuttering their maternity wards because people are having that many fewer children. Excerpt:
Quote:

Roughly 2.2 million women of childbearing age lived in so-called maternity deserts in 2020, according to March of Dimes, which it defined as counties without a hospital, a birth center, and doctors and nurse midwives with experience delivering babies. The 1,052 counties on the list represented an increase of 70 counties since 2016, the nonprofit's latest analysis found.
Women in remote rural communities are more likely to give birth too early after losing a local maternity unit, research shows. Babies born preterm are at higher risk of death, disabilities or chronic health issues, such as asthma. Women who give birth in rural hospitals that deliver fewer babies are also at higher risk for serious complications, such as acute kidney failure, research shows.
The birth rates are in collapse everywhere in the world save for Africa. The poorest continent is also the one most open to life. I have never understood how it is that every generation in the West had much more materially difficult lives than we do today, and yet they all chose to have families. My own dad was born in the teeth of the Great Depression. His older sister died in childbirth at home in rural Louisiana, but his mother and father decided to have another baby, and that was how he came along. Few people, relatively speaking, really thought about whether or not they should or shouldn't have kids. It was just something you did, no matter how hard times were.
Now, when times aren't materially difficult compared to ages past times of war, disease, widespread poverty, and so forth people choose not to reproduce. 'Why?
The friend and reader who sent me that link added this quote from Malcolm Muggeridge:
Quote:

So the final conclusion would surely be that whereas other civilizations have been brought down by attacks of barbarians from without, ours had the unique distinction of training its own destroyers at its own educational institutions, and then providing them with facilities for propagating their destructive ideology far and wide, all at the public expense.
Thus did Western Man decide to abolish himself, creating his own boredom out of his own affluence, his own vulnerability out of his own strength, his own impotence out of his own erotomania, himself blowing the trumpet that brought the walls of his own city tumbling down, and having convinced himself that he was too numerous, labored with pill and scalpel and syringe to make himself fewer. Until at last, having educated himself into imbecility, and polluted and drugged himself into stupefaction, he keeled over--a weary, battered old brontosaurus--and became extinct.
-Rod Dreher
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They should trumpet the devastated women that never had children or never had the chance even with what the left wrought upon them with their nonsense. It's so sad to witness if you've seen it up close.

Add to that most people have no clue what's going to happen to them these next many months financially and they should consider that one is never going to be financially secure enough for a family and they should start before it's too late.

The house of cards cometh. Bookmark this.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
contrario said:

Why must the population sustain itself? Why would it be a bad thing for there to be less people?


Although I'm sure the Gaia worshippers would love to have fewer people despoiling their temple, there is another sacred cow of theirs this gores though I doubt they are intelligent enough to realize it.

Fewer people = a complete collapse of every social insurance scheme in the western world with the future recipients left holding the bag.

...and while you may say that you'll save and invest so that you won't be relying on social security nobody escapes the coming collapse of Medicare unless you (1) have Bill Gates money or (2) leave the country for retirement.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

contrario said:

Why must the population sustain itself? Why would it be a bad thing for there to be less people?


Although I'm sure the Gaia worshippers would love to have fewer people despoiling their temple, there is another sacred cow of theirs this gores though I doubt they are intelligent enough to realize it.

Fewer people = a complete collapse of every social insurance scheme in the western world with the future recipients left holding the bag.

...and while you may say that you'll save and invest so that you won't be relying on social security nobody escapes the coming collapse of Medicare unless you (1) have Bill Gates money or (2) leave the country for retirement.

Bingo

At the very least modern society requires a replacement level fertility rate to work…and even then it would be tough to keep things going.

Negative growth is a recipe for civilizational collapse.

Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



Where do they think they are gonna get these immigrants in the future....from Mars?

At the rate the world is dropping in fertility there will not be a single nation with replacement level fertility rates in 2100....probably much sooner than that.

Already today only one region on earth has a decently high fertility rate and that is SSA...and its dropping fast.

For instance Burkina Faso went from 6.5 kids in 2000 to only 4.5 kids per woman today in 2023....at that rate decline it will be below replacement in 25 years.

And there is no reason to think Burkina Faso is some kind of outlier in Africa.

The USA has got to increase its birth rate at home...and to rely on endless immigration to solve the problem.

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

boognish_bear said:




The USA has got to increase its birth rate at home...and to rely on endless immigration to solve the problem.


Until life in the US becomes affordable again for young people it's hard to see this changing...
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

Redbrickbear said:

boognish_bear said:




The USA has got to increase its birth rate at home...and to rely on endless immigration to solve the problem.


Until life in the US becomes affordable again for young people it's hard to see this changing...

Agree,

But at best mass immigration is a short term fix to a very long term problem.

There are just not going to be enough in 50 years to keep this scam going
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
contrario said:

Why must the population sustain itself? Why would it be a bad thing for there to be less people?


Fewer people will result in the collapse of the welfare state that provides employment and wealth to your overlords.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:




You can either have women getting married and having large families or you can have feminism, but you can't have both. Joe Biden's pregnant fighter pilots aren't going to be popping out 3 or 4 kids to reverse demographic decline.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.