What really happened with the Hunter Biden story suppression by Twitter will be published on Twitter at 5pm ET!
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 2, 2022
Twitter now belongs to Musk
31,390 Views |
398 Replies |
Last: 10 mo ago by Redbrickbear
Here we go!! 🍿🍿 https://t.co/eILK9f3bAm
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 2, 2022
We can't let Twitter lose the character it once had!!!
8. By 2020, requests from connected actors to delete tweets were routine. One executive would write to another: “More to review from the Biden team.” The reply would come back: “Handled.” pic.twitter.com/mnv0YZI4af
— Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) December 2, 2022
19. White House spokeswoman Kaleigh McEnany was locked out of her account for tweeting about the story, prompting a furious letter from Trump campaign staffer Mike Hahn, who seethed: “At least pretend to care for the next 20 days.” pic.twitter.com/CcXTfsdzCT
— Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) December 3, 2022
Absolute proof Twitter interfered with the 2020 election and more.
They gaslit millions of people.
They gaslit millions of people.
.@RealJamesWoods tells Tucker Carlson that he will be suing the DNC following the bombshell revelations regarding Twitter’s suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story.
— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) December 3, 2022
Read more: https://t.co/meBInrZRHE pic.twitter.com/aygncjmShL
Cobretti said:Here we go!! 🍿🍿 https://t.co/eILK9f3bAm
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 2, 2022
You can just call me the Mary Poppins of disinformation 💁🏻♀️ https://t.co/eGV9lpctYn pic.twitter.com/WVQFA2bPmq
— Nina Jankowicz 🇺🇦🇺🇸 (@wiczipedia) February 17, 2021
Kind of can't believe this isn't a bigger story. It should be.
who would tell it? Certainly not all the media that Colluded to suppress the story..nein51 said:
Kind of can't believe this isn't a bigger story. It should be.
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”
Jon Stewart
Jon Stewart
The Democratic Party was so concerned about misinformation and election interference that the leaders lobbied the media to lie to American citizens to ensure their candidate became president.
— Max Abrahms (@MaxAbrahms) December 3, 2022
It's kind of morbidly hilarious to see the enduring focus on Hunter's supposed laptop. Frankly, it shows how weak of a hand Republicans are forced to play when it comes to attacking Biden's ethics (a position weakend by their own support for the most corrupt POTUS in living memory), but I digress.
If the people insisting it's legit could actually prove the laptop's provenance then that would be one thing, but they flat out refused to share what they had with actual journalistic outfits during the election (they were explicitly told that's why the story got treated the way it did), and as time has gone on it's become very clear they they did that because it's shady af. Even NYPost itself originally published the story without any names on the byline because it was so obviously shady, and their reporters all balked at claiming "credit", which should be a huge tell to any objective observer.
Essentially what we have here are butthurt Republicans whining that one social media platform actually learned a lesson from 2016, and wouldn't let them use foreign (Russian) espionage to help Trump's campaign...again. Ironically, those same whiny titty babies also had nothing to say when we learned that people like Hannity, Tucker, and Bartiromo had direct lines to POTUS' chief of staff, which they used to literally workshop talking points and ask what they should focus on (going far beyond anything the Biden team ever did with Twitter).
And of course now Trump is demanding that he should be "installed" as President due to these "revelations", while Putin smiles at the huge ROI he got from just a few of his hack-and-leak operations because Trumpers are credulous dupes.
If the people insisting it's legit could actually prove the laptop's provenance then that would be one thing, but they flat out refused to share what they had with actual journalistic outfits during the election (they were explicitly told that's why the story got treated the way it did), and as time has gone on it's become very clear they they did that because it's shady af. Even NYPost itself originally published the story without any names on the byline because it was so obviously shady, and their reporters all balked at claiming "credit", which should be a huge tell to any objective observer.
Essentially what we have here are butthurt Republicans whining that one social media platform actually learned a lesson from 2016, and wouldn't let them use foreign (Russian) espionage to help Trump's campaign...again. Ironically, those same whiny titty babies also had nothing to say when we learned that people like Hannity, Tucker, and Bartiromo had direct lines to POTUS' chief of staff, which they used to literally workshop talking points and ask what they should focus on (going far beyond anything the Biden team ever did with Twitter).
And of course now Trump is demanding that he should be "installed" as President due to these "revelations", while Putin smiles at the huge ROI he got from just a few of his hack-and-leak operations because Trumpers are credulous dupes.
Here is Elon's entire first drop showing how Twitter memory-holed the true story of Hunter Biden's laptop from hell https://t.co/uofRq83Jqr
— Not the Bee (@Not_the_Bee) December 3, 2022
Thank you for your opinion, Nina.HuMcK said:
It's kind of morbidly hilarious to see the enduring focus on Hunter's supposed laptop. Frankly, it shows how weak of a hand Republicans are forced to play when it comes to attacking Biden's ethics (a position weakend by their own support for the most corrupt POTUS in living memory), but I digress.
If the people insisting it's legit could actually prove the laptop's provenance then that would be one thing, but they flat out refused to share what they had with actual journalistic outfits during the election (they were explicitly told that's why the story got treated the way it did), and as time has gone on it's become very clear they they did that because it's shady af. Even NYPost itself originally published the story without any names on the byline because it was so obviously shady, and their reporters all balked at claiming "credit", which should be a huge tell to any objective observer.
Essentially what we have here are butthurt Republicans whining that one social media platform actually learned a lesson from 2016, and wouldn't let them use foreign (Russian) espionage to help Trump's campaign...again. Ironically, those same whiny titty babies also had nothing to say when we learned that people like Hannity, Tucker, and Bartiromo had direct lines to POTUS' chief of staff, which they used to literally workshop talking points and ask what they should focus on (going far beyond anything the Biden team ever did with Twitter).
And of course now Trump is demanding that he should be "installed" as President due to these "revelations", while Putin smiles at the huge ROI he got from just a few of his hack-and-leak operations because Trumpers are credulous dupes.
So, just to recap:HuMcK said:
It's kind of morbidly hilarious to see the enduring focus on Hunter's supposed laptop. Frankly, it shows how weak of a hand Republicans are forced to play when it comes to attacking Biden's ethics (a position weakend by their own support for the most corrupt POTUS in living memory), but I digress.
If the people insisting it's legit could actually prove the laptop's provenance then that would be one thing, but they flat out refused to share what they had with actual journalistic outfits during the election (they were explicitly told that's why the story got treated the way it did), and as time has gone on it's become very clear they they did that because it's shady af. Even NYPost itself originally published the story without any names on the byline because it was so obviously shady, and their reporters all balked at claiming "credit", which should be a huge tell to any objective observer.
Essentially what we have here are butthurt Republicans whining that one social media platform actually learned a lesson from 2016, and wouldn't let them use foreign (Russian) espionage to help Trump's campaign...again. Ironically, those same whiny titty babies also had nothing to say when we learned that people like Hannity, Tucker, and Bartiromo had direct lines to POTUS' chief of staff, which they used to literally workshop talking points and ask what they should focus on (going far beyond anything the Biden team ever did with Twitter).
And of course now Trump is demanding that he should be "installed" as President due to these "revelations", while Putin smiles at the huge ROI he got from just a few of his hack-and-leak operations because Trumpers are credulous dupes.
1) Its a Lie and the public can't be allowed to hear "misinformation" because that would distort the election,
THEN, when its obviously true:
2)It's not a big deal at all and was just butthurt that they couldn't tell the public about it.
And just for good measure:
3) TRUMP!
Seriously, do you ever wake up and say "Holy crap, I've become the guy that doesn't care what's true anymore!" Or do you totally lack self-awareness? Do you not recognize how "Trumplike" this is?
. @elonmusk I hope you are surrounded by massive security and in an extremely safe undisclosed location - you just became public enemy number one to some very very bad people, I pray for your safety and thank you for your bravery! We need more @elonmusk in our society!!!
— Caitlyn Jenner (@Caitlyn_Jenner) December 3, 2022
Why would Trump not be a part of this conversation about one of his chief grievances? I get that some of y'all are embarrassed to have supported the guy (the smart ones anyway), but like it or not this story is about him too.
I've long said that I believe the information released from the "laptop" (or a hacked iCloud account, where every scrap released so far has come from) is real, but I also think the story they concocted about where it came from is horse****. Giuliani was stupid enough to literally have himself photographed with a man Trump's admin sanctioned for being a Russian spy, while in Ukraine seeking the exact kind of "dirt" on Hunter that just so happened to then miraculously appear in the hands of a blind man who can plausibly claim to not have seen who gave it to him.
I'm sorry, but if you believe that story and have no questions about it, then you should return your Baylor degree for being a dunce. The question then becomes: does Twitter have an obligation to publish something that may be stolen, may legitimately be fruit of a foreign aspionage action (again), and the suppliers of it can't/won't prove provenance? They decided no, after an internal debate. Given the context of what happened in 2016 and and what Giuliani was doing in Ukraine late 2019-early 2020, it makes sense.
I've long said that I believe the information released from the "laptop" (or a hacked iCloud account, where every scrap released so far has come from) is real, but I also think the story they concocted about where it came from is horse****. Giuliani was stupid enough to literally have himself photographed with a man Trump's admin sanctioned for being a Russian spy, while in Ukraine seeking the exact kind of "dirt" on Hunter that just so happened to then miraculously appear in the hands of a blind man who can plausibly claim to not have seen who gave it to him.
I'm sorry, but if you believe that story and have no questions about it, then you should return your Baylor degree for being a dunce. The question then becomes: does Twitter have an obligation to publish something that may be stolen, may legitimately be fruit of a foreign aspionage action (again), and the suppliers of it can't/won't prove provenance? They decided no, after an internal debate. Given the context of what happened in 2016 and and what Giuliani was doing in Ukraine late 2019-early 2020, it makes sense.
Said the dumbass that believes Russian Hoax and Juicy Smalls.HuMcK said:
Why would Trump not be a part of this conversation about one of his chief grievances? I get that some of y'all are embarrassed to have supported the guy (the smart ones anyway), but like it or not this story is about him too.
I've long said that I believe the information released from the "laptop" (or a hacked iCloud account, where every scrap released so far has come from) is real, but I also think the story they concocted about where it came from is horse****. Giuliani was stupid enough to literally have himself photographed with a man Trump's admin sanctioned for being a Russian spy, while in Ukraine seeking the exact kind of "dirt" on Hunter that just so happened to then miraculously appear in the hands of a blind man who can plausibly claim to not have seen who gave it to him.
I'm sorry, but if you believe that story and have no questions about it, then you should return your Baylor degree for being a dunce. The question then becomes: does Twitter have an obligation to publish something that may be stolen, may legitimately be fruit of a foreign aspionage action (again), and the suppliers of it can't/won't prove provenance? They decided no, after an internal debate. Given the context of what happened in 2016 and and what Giuliani was doing in Ukraine late 2019-early 2020, it makes sense.
It's not just the laptop you nitwit. Hunter's business partner has discussed how he laundered money from Russia, Ukraine, and China for the BIden Crime Family. But you keep believing Stacy Abrams is the governor of Georgia and millions of black men are shot each day by police.
When will their clearances be pulled? pic.twitter.com/vFSBDq4ona
— Bernard B. Kerik (@BernardKerik) December 3, 2022
Jan 6th was false flag to get the attention off the real insurrection and election fraud committed by the DNC, Biden admin and the intel agencies.
we always knew the govt was telling twitter’s troglodyte commissars what to censor, but there’s a big difference between knowing something and having documentation to prove it
— Zero H.P. Lovecraft 🦅🐍 (@0x49fa98) December 3, 2022
Musk’s disclosures are vindicating
The question is if anyone is strong enough to act on them
Cobretti said:Cobretti said:Here we go!! 🍿🍿 https://t.co/eILK9f3bAm
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 2, 2022You can just call me the Mary Poppins of disinformation 💁🏻♀️ https://t.co/eGV9lpctYn pic.twitter.com/WVQFA2bPmq
— Nina Jankowicz 🇺🇦🇺🇸 (@wiczipedia) February 17, 2021
It's hard to take our Regime overlords seriously when they rely on theatre kids to staff the bureaucracy.
But maybe that just shows how powerful they are..they are in such uncontested control of our national institutions that they can just turn over the day to day to goofy women from middle ranked Big 10 state schools to rule over us.
NEW from @JudiciaryGOP to me:
— Jon Levine (@LevineJonathan) December 3, 2022
“We’re tracking Vijaya Gadde’s role in the suppression of the New York Post story on Hunter Biden’s laptop. We absolutely plan to investigate this more. Stay tuned”
Yoel Roth made an entire career out of intellectualizing his homosexual fetishes - even writing his PhD dissertation on his random GRINDr encounters. He then got put in charge of censoring "hate speech" on twitter. A path to power and a reality most GOP voters aren't aware of. pic.twitter.com/EmhuNCHxtP
— Märtin (@davidcrockettfa) December 3, 2022
HuMcK said:
Why would Trump not be a part of this conversation about one of his chief grievances? I get that some of y'all are embarrassed to have supported the guy (the smart ones anyway), but like it or not this story is about him too.
I've long said that I believe the information released from the "laptop" (or a hacked iCloud account, where every scrap released so far has come from) is real, but I also think the story they concocted about where it came from is horse****. Giuliani was stupid enough to literally have himself photographed with a man Trump's admin sanctioned for being a Russian spy, while in Ukraine seeking the exact kind of "dirt" on Hunter that just so happened to then miraculously appear in the hands of a blind man who can plausibly claim to not have seen who gave it to him.
I'm sorry, but if you believe that story and have no questions about it, then you should return your Baylor degree for being a dunce. The question then becomes: does Twitter have an obligation to publish something that may be stolen, may legitimately be fruit of a foreign aspionage action (again), and the suppliers of it can't/won't prove provenance? They decided no, after an internal debate. Given the context of what happened in 2016 and and what Giuliani was doing in Ukraine late 2019-early 2020, it makes sense.
You realize you are describing the Steele dossier perfectly, right?
Nvm
Another buried lede in Musk/Twitter disclosures are all those emails about how “Congress was ready to act” and “this was the last straw” and then nothing remotely happened
— Jon Levine (@LevineJonathan) December 3, 2022
That is because The New York Times has become, for all intents and purposes, an unregistered lobbying firm for far left politicians
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 3, 2022
Latest from @LevineJonathan Former top intel chiefs silent after Musk Twitter disclosures https://t.co/icsbS8GF8A
— Miranda Devine (@mirandadevine) December 3, 2022
Truly incredible -- former Twitter executive @yoyoel, who just got caught fabricating a fake justification for censoring a media outlet, says the decision to ban Trump after Jan 6 was impelled by the "trauma" he and other "content moderators" experienced online that fateful day pic.twitter.com/JSE7tpXtGz
— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) December 3, 2022
Please step away from the Bong!muddybrazos said:When will their clearances be pulled? pic.twitter.com/vFSBDq4ona
— Bernard B. Kerik (@BernardKerik) December 3, 2022
Jan 6th was false flag to get the attention off the real insurrection and election fraud committed by the DNC, Biden admin and the intel agencies.
Gee big surprise.
Unreal! Katie Hobbs’s office contacts Twitter to have posts removed! So, the democrat candidate, who ran the AZ election, censored her political opponents, disrupted Election Day votes, and then threatened counties with prosecution if they didn’t declare her the winner. pic.twitter.com/TWIgHHPqkd
— Christina Bobb (@christina_bobb) December 4, 2022
Roth defends the decision to ban @TheBabylonBee: "Not only is it not funny, it is dangerous"
— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) December 4, 2022
Kara Swisher, no fan of the Babylon Bee, gently disagrees -- noting that the account was engaged in satire. "It's still misgendering," Roth insists pic.twitter.com/BlwksaKDH3
The NYT still has 0 mentions of ChatGPT, which is basically all tech has been talking about for the last few days.
— Flo Crivello (@Altimor) December 5, 2022
Instead, 3 out of the top 4 articles in its tech section are about Elon and Twitter - mostly negative, of course. pic.twitter.com/wbDVDeo2pm
Redbrickbear said:Roth defends the decision to ban @TheBabylonBee: "Not only is it not funny, it is dangerous"
— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) December 4, 2022
Kara Swisher, no fan of the Babylon Bee, gently disagrees -- noting that the account was engaged in satire. "It's still misgendering," Roth insists pic.twitter.com/BlwksaKDH3
Thank God for the 1st Amendment or we would have f***-wads like this guy determining what you can and can't say.
Jack Bauer said:Redbrickbear said:Roth defends the decision to ban @TheBabylonBee: "Not only is it not funny, it is dangerous"
— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) December 4, 2022
Kara Swisher, no fan of the Babylon Bee, gently disagrees -- noting that the account was engaged in satire. "It's still misgendering," Roth insists pic.twitter.com/BlwksaKDH3
Thank God for the 1st Amendment or we would have f***-wads like this guy determining what you can and can't say.
Which is what happens in the UK, Australia, other European states, and other nations where people get arrested for "offensive speech".
Amnesty International asks Nigeria to release a student who’s been arrested for a tweet, which allegedly defamed the wife of the nation’s President Muhammadu Buhari https://t.co/H7cq1EIHgu
— Bloomberg (@business) December 2, 2022
GFY
Jean-Pierre on @elonmusk releasing the Twitter files: "We see this as an interesting, or a coincidence, that he would so haphazardly push this distraction full of old news [while] at the same time Twitter is facing questions about the rising volume of hate on their platform" pic.twitter.com/0IsQDX5OkY
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) December 5, 2022