The only way a background check is removed in South Carolina is if you go through the Concealed Weapons Permit process. Then you can buy a firearm without the wait time and the fbi check since you are a CWP holder. I am pretty sure that is how it works in most of the other Southern states as well.ShooterTX said:Mitch Blood Green said:ATL Bear said:
Guns in the hands of the mentally unstable has always been a recipe for disaster. Too bad we can't have honest discussions about the mental health issues of transgenderism.
In state after state in the south, we are are removing background checks.
can you give an example of this? I was not aware that anyone was removing background checks.
Female shooter at Nashville Christian school
49,419 Views |
669 Replies |
Last: 1 yr ago by Doc Holliday
Yep.ron.reagan said:Maybe they got all the bad out in those few decades of committing the worst atrocities in human historycowboycwr said:We can learn a lot from Japan. Like how during the WBC a home run ball was passed around the crowd for people to take pictures with it and returned to the person who caught it. Or how their crowd cleans up the stadium after a world cup match or Olympic event (even areas they were not sitting in or even how their kids spend part of the day cleaning their own schools.Doc Holliday said:I don't think you understand how deplorable people in the US are.cms186 said:Sorry, you are (semi) correct, there is one other country other 40, Yemencowboycwr said:False- there are other countries with over 40 per 100 people. But don't let facts ruin your talking points.cms186 said:Mexico has strict Gun Laws (though there are still an estimated 15 guns per 100 people in Mexico, which is about average compared to most other countries in the world, the ONLY country in the world with more than 40 guns per 100 people in population is the USA), sure, and a poorly combatted problem with organised crime, what about ALL the other countries with strict gun control laws, like Australia, Singapore, the UK, Germany, France, Japan, China etc.?RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:Mexico has the strictest gun control laws in all of the world. Their country of 126 million people had a total of 30,968 homicides in 2022. The United States, made up of 327 million people, had 26,031 homicides in 2022.cms186 said:Well the details on this particular incident aren't even known yet, so knowing what would have stopped "this" isnt possiblebearsocal said:What purposed gun control measure would have stopped this?cms186 said:no, you're right, im sure your thoughts and prayers will be enoughchriscbear said:
More gun control needed obviously.
Strict gun control laws only embolden the criminals and leave citizens much more vulnerable to violent crime.
china.... you really want to list China for gun control laws when they are the BIGGEST violator of human rights in the world and are in an active government sponsored genocide....
Yes they are and if we were talking about Human rights or State sponsored Genocide, then you might have a point, but we arentThis is Japan. Nobody steals the money. This would never happen in America. Why? pic.twitter.com/dhcXYAF8Uh
— E (@ElijahSchaffer) March 27, 2023
If you did this in a major city in the US, there would be fighting or even bloodshed over the money. Japan has horrible living wages and labor and they still don't tear each other apart.
The Nanjing massacre is literally THE WORST atrocity committed by mankind.
Yeah, but that is because to get a CWP you must go through a much more intensive FBI background check. That is the way it has been in Texas for decades.muddybrazos said:The only way a background check is removed in South Carolina is if you go through the Concealed Weapons Permit process. Then you can buy a firearm without the wait time and the fbi check since you are a CWP holder. I am pretty sure that is how it works in most of the other Southern states as well.ShooterTX said:Mitch Blood Green said:ATL Bear said:
Guns in the hands of the mentally unstable has always been a recipe for disaster. Too bad we can't have honest discussions about the mental health issues of transgenderism.
In state after state in the south, we are are removing background checks.
can you give an example of this? I was not aware that anyone was removing background checks.
I'm just calling out this liar on his obvious string of lies that he posted.
Guns create violence in the same way forks & spoons create obesity.
She'd say that if "Big Guy" Joe was shooting up a school himself.BornAgain said:
White House press secretary says it's republicans fault for shootings.
Genghis Khan says 'don't forget me!'Doc Holliday said:Yep.ron.reagan said:Maybe they got all the bad out in those few decades of committing the worst atrocities in human historycowboycwr said:We can learn a lot from Japan. Like how during the WBC a home run ball was passed around the crowd for people to take pictures with it and returned to the person who caught it. Or how their crowd cleans up the stadium after a world cup match or Olympic event (even areas they were not sitting in or even how their kids spend part of the day cleaning their own schools.Doc Holliday said:I don't think you understand how deplorable people in the US are.cms186 said:Sorry, you are (semi) correct, there is one other country other 40, Yemencowboycwr said:False- there are other countries with over 40 per 100 people. But don't let facts ruin your talking points.cms186 said:Mexico has strict Gun Laws (though there are still an estimated 15 guns per 100 people in Mexico, which is about average compared to most other countries in the world, the ONLY country in the world with more than 40 guns per 100 people in population is the USA), sure, and a poorly combatted problem with organised crime, what about ALL the other countries with strict gun control laws, like Australia, Singapore, the UK, Germany, France, Japan, China etc.?RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:Mexico has the strictest gun control laws in all of the world. Their country of 126 million people had a total of 30,968 homicides in 2022. The United States, made up of 327 million people, had 26,031 homicides in 2022.cms186 said:Well the details on this particular incident aren't even known yet, so knowing what would have stopped "this" isnt possiblebearsocal said:What purposed gun control measure would have stopped this?cms186 said:no, you're right, im sure your thoughts and prayers will be enoughchriscbear said:
More gun control needed obviously.
Strict gun control laws only embolden the criminals and leave citizens much more vulnerable to violent crime.
china.... you really want to list China for gun control laws when they are the BIGGEST violator of human rights in the world and are in an active government sponsored genocide....
Yes they are and if we were talking about Human rights or State sponsored Genocide, then you might have a point, but we arentThis is Japan. Nobody steals the money. This would never happen in America. Why? pic.twitter.com/dhcXYAF8Uh
— E (@ElijahSchaffer) March 27, 2023
If you did this in a major city in the US, there would be fighting or even bloodshed over the money. Japan has horrible living wages and labor and they still don't tear each other apart.
The Nanjing massacre is literally THE WORST atrocity committed by mankind.
there aren't, the Falklands and New Caledonia are part of the UK and France respectively, they are not individual countries, the next highest is Serbia and Montenegro, who both lie at just under 40, even if i am wrong, the USA has more than double the amount of any other country in the world, you are the only country in the world where the amount of Civilian owned firearms exceeds the number of civilians.cowboycwr said:Still wrong. There are others.cms186 said:Sorry, you are (semi) correct, there is one other country other 40, Yemencowboycwr said:False- there are other countries with over 40 per 100 people. But don't let facts ruin your talking points.cms186 said:Mexico has strict Gun Laws (though there are still an estimated 15 guns per 100 people in Mexico, which is about average compared to most other countries in the world, the ONLY country in the world with more than 40 guns per 100 people in population is the USA), sure, and a poorly combatted problem with organised crime, what about ALL the other countries with strict gun control laws, like Australia, Singapore, the UK, Germany, France, Japan, China etc.?RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:Mexico has the strictest gun control laws in all of the world. Their country of 126 million people had a total of 30,968 homicides in 2022. The United States, made up of 327 million people, had 26,031 homicides in 2022.cms186 said:Well the details on this particular incident aren't even known yet, so knowing what would have stopped "this" isnt possiblebearsocal said:What purposed gun control measure would have stopped this?cms186 said:no, you're right, im sure your thoughts and prayers will be enoughchriscbear said:
More gun control needed obviously.
Strict gun control laws only embolden the criminals and leave citizens much more vulnerable to violent crime.
china.... you really want to list China for gun control laws when they are the BIGGEST violator of human rights in the world and are in an active government sponsored genocide....
Yes they are and if we were talking about Human rights or State sponsored Genocide, then you might have a point, but we arent
And the point is that you cannot talk about the lack of gun crime in a country that forcibly took guns away from their citizens and then sends in the military to execute people at will, jail anyone who speaks out or pretend that their lack of gun crime somehow proves gun laws work.
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/gun-ownership-by-country
https://www.smallarmssurvey.org/database/global-firearms-holdings
You can quibble all you like, but any developed country that has strict Gun Laws, doesnt have a major problem with Gun Crime
I'm the English Guy
really? I mean, theres a **** load of competition for that unwanted title, the Nanjing Massacre saw 2-300k people killed, along with rape and pillaging, the purging by the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia saw 2 million, there the obvious example of the Holocaust with an approx 6 million deaths (or indeed the Nazi genocides against occupied Poland and Soviet Union, which, whilst less well known than the victims of the Holocaust, still saw a combined number of Deaths of around 5 million people)Doc Holliday said:Yep.ron.reagan said:Maybe they got all the bad out in those few decades of committing the worst atrocities in human historycowboycwr said:We can learn a lot from Japan. Like how during the WBC a home run ball was passed around the crowd for people to take pictures with it and returned to the person who caught it. Or how their crowd cleans up the stadium after a world cup match or Olympic event (even areas they were not sitting in or even how their kids spend part of the day cleaning their own schools.Doc Holliday said:I don't think you understand how deplorable people in the US are.cms186 said:Sorry, you are (semi) correct, there is one other country other 40, Yemencowboycwr said:False- there are other countries with over 40 per 100 people. But don't let facts ruin your talking points.cms186 said:Mexico has strict Gun Laws (though there are still an estimated 15 guns per 100 people in Mexico, which is about average compared to most other countries in the world, the ONLY country in the world with more than 40 guns per 100 people in population is the USA), sure, and a poorly combatted problem with organised crime, what about ALL the other countries with strict gun control laws, like Australia, Singapore, the UK, Germany, France, Japan, China etc.?RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:Mexico has the strictest gun control laws in all of the world. Their country of 126 million people had a total of 30,968 homicides in 2022. The United States, made up of 327 million people, had 26,031 homicides in 2022.cms186 said:Well the details on this particular incident aren't even known yet, so knowing what would have stopped "this" isnt possiblebearsocal said:What purposed gun control measure would have stopped this?cms186 said:no, you're right, im sure your thoughts and prayers will be enoughchriscbear said:
More gun control needed obviously.
Strict gun control laws only embolden the criminals and leave citizens much more vulnerable to violent crime.
china.... you really want to list China for gun control laws when they are the BIGGEST violator of human rights in the world and are in an active government sponsored genocide....
Yes they are and if we were talking about Human rights or State sponsored Genocide, then you might have a point, but we arentThis is Japan. Nobody steals the money. This would never happen in America. Why? pic.twitter.com/dhcXYAF8Uh
— E (@ElijahSchaffer) March 27, 2023
If you did this in a major city in the US, there would be fighting or even bloodshed over the money. Japan has horrible living wages and labor and they still don't tear each other apart.
The Nanjing massacre is literally THE WORST atrocity committed by mankind.
I'm the English Guy
65,000,000 dead humans since 1970s. Pro-abortion folks put Hitler to shame in the body count department.cms186 said:really? I mean, theres a **** load of competition for that unwanted title, the Nanjing Massacre saw 2-300k people killed, along with rape and pillaging, the purging by the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia saw 2 million, there the obvious example of the Holocaust with an approx 6 million deaths (or indeed the Nazi genocides against occupied Poland and Soviet Union, which, whilst less well known than the victims of the Holocaust, still saw a combined number of Deaths of around 5 million people)Doc Holliday said:Yep.ron.reagan said:Maybe they got all the bad out in those few decades of committing the worst atrocities in human historycowboycwr said:We can learn a lot from Japan. Like how during the WBC a home run ball was passed around the crowd for people to take pictures with it and returned to the person who caught it. Or how their crowd cleans up the stadium after a world cup match or Olympic event (even areas they were not sitting in or even how their kids spend part of the day cleaning their own schools.Doc Holliday said:I don't think you understand how deplorable people in the US are.cms186 said:Sorry, you are (semi) correct, there is one other country other 40, Yemencowboycwr said:False- there are other countries with over 40 per 100 people. But don't let facts ruin your talking points.cms186 said:Mexico has strict Gun Laws (though there are still an estimated 15 guns per 100 people in Mexico, which is about average compared to most other countries in the world, the ONLY country in the world with more than 40 guns per 100 people in population is the USA), sure, and a poorly combatted problem with organised crime, what about ALL the other countries with strict gun control laws, like Australia, Singapore, the UK, Germany, France, Japan, China etc.?RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:Mexico has the strictest gun control laws in all of the world. Their country of 126 million people had a total of 30,968 homicides in 2022. The United States, made up of 327 million people, had 26,031 homicides in 2022.cms186 said:Well the details on this particular incident aren't even known yet, so knowing what would have stopped "this" isnt possiblebearsocal said:What purposed gun control measure would have stopped this?cms186 said:no, you're right, im sure your thoughts and prayers will be enoughchriscbear said:
More gun control needed obviously.
Strict gun control laws only embolden the criminals and leave citizens much more vulnerable to violent crime.
china.... you really want to list China for gun control laws when they are the BIGGEST violator of human rights in the world and are in an active government sponsored genocide....
Yes they are and if we were talking about Human rights or State sponsored Genocide, then you might have a point, but we arentThis is Japan. Nobody steals the money. This would never happen in America. Why? pic.twitter.com/dhcXYAF8Uh
— E (@ElijahSchaffer) March 27, 2023
If you did this in a major city in the US, there would be fighting or even bloodshed over the money. Japan has horrible living wages and labor and they still don't tear each other apart.
The Nanjing massacre is literally THE WORST atrocity committed by mankind.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?
Why again is Abortion so important for our Government? votes?
We have to make room for the 3rd world's poor.BornAgain said:
Why again is Abortion so important for our Government? votes?
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?
Wangchung said:65,000,000 dead humans since 1970s. Pro-abortion folks put Hitler to shame in the body count department.cms186 said:really? I mean, theres a **** load of competition for that unwanted title, the Nanjing Massacre saw 2-300k people killed, along with rape and pillaging, the purging by the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia saw 2 million, there the obvious example of the Holocaust with an approx 6 million deaths (or indeed the Nazi genocides against occupied Poland and Soviet Union, which, whilst less well known than the victims of the Holocaust, still saw a combined number of Deaths of around 5 million people)Doc Holliday said:Yep.ron.reagan said:Maybe they got all the bad out in those few decades of committing the worst atrocities in human historycowboycwr said:We can learn a lot from Japan. Like how during the WBC a home run ball was passed around the crowd for people to take pictures with it and returned to the person who caught it. Or how their crowd cleans up the stadium after a world cup match or Olympic event (even areas they were not sitting in or even how their kids spend part of the day cleaning their own schools.Doc Holliday said:I don't think you understand how deplorable people in the US are.cms186 said:Sorry, you are (semi) correct, there is one other country other 40, Yemencowboycwr said:False- there are other countries with over 40 per 100 people. But don't let facts ruin your talking points.cms186 said:Mexico has strict Gun Laws (though there are still an estimated 15 guns per 100 people in Mexico, which is about average compared to most other countries in the world, the ONLY country in the world with more than 40 guns per 100 people in population is the USA), sure, and a poorly combatted problem with organised crime, what about ALL the other countries with strict gun control laws, like Australia, Singapore, the UK, Germany, France, Japan, China etc.?RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:Mexico has the strictest gun control laws in all of the world. Their country of 126 million people had a total of 30,968 homicides in 2022. The United States, made up of 327 million people, had 26,031 homicides in 2022.cms186 said:Well the details on this particular incident aren't even known yet, so knowing what would have stopped "this" isnt possiblebearsocal said:What purposed gun control measure would have stopped this?cms186 said:no, you're right, im sure your thoughts and prayers will be enoughchriscbear said:
More gun control needed obviously.
Strict gun control laws only embolden the criminals and leave citizens much more vulnerable to violent crime.
china.... you really want to list China for gun control laws when they are the BIGGEST violator of human rights in the world and are in an active government sponsored genocide....
Yes they are and if we were talking about Human rights or State sponsored Genocide, then you might have a point, but we arentThis is Japan. Nobody steals the money. This would never happen in America. Why? pic.twitter.com/dhcXYAF8Uh
— E (@ElijahSchaffer) March 27, 2023
If you did this in a major city in the US, there would be fighting or even bloodshed over the money. Japan has horrible living wages and labor and they still don't tear each other apart.
The Nanjing massacre is literally THE WORST atrocity committed by mankind.
And Stalin and Mao and Pol Pot
Its a hard thing to even ponder how we have let that many children be murdered.
Just the occasional dictatorship, and of course street crime by criminals delighted that the general population is defenseless.
To me, the big question is how do you mitigate these instances and can it realistically be done?
While I think gun regulation could be better, I don't see a ban on particular weapons being of much use. Better regulations would be preferred, in my opinion, rather than any ineffective ban.
Criminals are going to be criminals and they will find a way to circumvent any laws, which they don't care about anyways.
All that being said, as I have stated before, I think the answer is hardening the target. Perhaps figure out ways to enable defense of a school that would discourage an individual from selecting that target.
That's a hard nut to crack because costs and ability may be limited and probably will.
For every reason I can think of a solution, I can think of 2 that would decrease quality of life or take away freedoms.
Do we just consider this type of incident collateral damage or is there something that can truly be done about it?
I wish I could think of the answer, but I'm afraid heartbreak may just be part of the program.
I don't accept that notion.
While I think gun regulation could be better, I don't see a ban on particular weapons being of much use. Better regulations would be preferred, in my opinion, rather than any ineffective ban.
Criminals are going to be criminals and they will find a way to circumvent any laws, which they don't care about anyways.
All that being said, as I have stated before, I think the answer is hardening the target. Perhaps figure out ways to enable defense of a school that would discourage an individual from selecting that target.
That's a hard nut to crack because costs and ability may be limited and probably will.
For every reason I can think of a solution, I can think of 2 that would decrease quality of life or take away freedoms.
Do we just consider this type of incident collateral damage or is there something that can truly be done about it?
I wish I could think of the answer, but I'm afraid heartbreak may just be part of the program.
I don't accept that notion.
An honest media would have prevented this specific attack. This nut was enraged by all the false claims of anti-trans bills and took it out on Christian children.redfish961 said:
To me, the big question is how do you mitigate these instances and can it realistically be done?
While I think gun regulation could be better, I don't see a ban on particular weapons being of much use. Better regulations would be preferred, in my opinion, rather than any ineffective ban.
Criminals are going to be criminals and they will find a way to circumvent any laws, which they don't care about anyways.
All that being said, as I have stated before, I think the answer is hardening the target. Perhaps figure out ways to enable defense of a school that would discourage an individual from selecting that target.
That's a hard nut to crack because costs and ability may be limited and probably will.
For every reason I can think of a solution, I can think of 2 that would decrease quality of life or take away freedoms.
Do we just consider this type of incident collateral damage or is there something that can truly be done about it?
I wish I could think of the answer, but I'm afraid heartbreak may just be part of the program.
I don't accept that notion.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?
I don't mean by amount, but by pure brutality.cms186 said:really? I mean, theres a **** load of competition for that unwanted title, the Nanjing Massacre saw 2-300k people killed, along with rape and pillaging, the purging by the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia saw 2 million, there the obvious example of the Holocaust with an approx 6 million deaths (or indeed the Nazi genocides against occupied Poland and Soviet Union, which, whilst less well known than the victims of the Holocaust, still saw a combined number of Deaths of around 5 million people)Doc Holliday said:Yep.ron.reagan said:Maybe they got all the bad out in those few decades of committing the worst atrocities in human historycowboycwr said:We can learn a lot from Japan. Like how during the WBC a home run ball was passed around the crowd for people to take pictures with it and returned to the person who caught it. Or how their crowd cleans up the stadium after a world cup match or Olympic event (even areas they were not sitting in or even how their kids spend part of the day cleaning their own schools.Doc Holliday said:I don't think you understand how deplorable people in the US are.cms186 said:Sorry, you are (semi) correct, there is one other country other 40, Yemencowboycwr said:False- there are other countries with over 40 per 100 people. But don't let facts ruin your talking points.cms186 said:Mexico has strict Gun Laws (though there are still an estimated 15 guns per 100 people in Mexico, which is about average compared to most other countries in the world, the ONLY country in the world with more than 40 guns per 100 people in population is the USA), sure, and a poorly combatted problem with organised crime, what about ALL the other countries with strict gun control laws, like Australia, Singapore, the UK, Germany, France, Japan, China etc.?RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:Mexico has the strictest gun control laws in all of the world. Their country of 126 million people had a total of 30,968 homicides in 2022. The United States, made up of 327 million people, had 26,031 homicides in 2022.cms186 said:Well the details on this particular incident aren't even known yet, so knowing what would have stopped "this" isnt possiblebearsocal said:What purposed gun control measure would have stopped this?cms186 said:no, you're right, im sure your thoughts and prayers will be enoughchriscbear said:
More gun control needed obviously.
Strict gun control laws only embolden the criminals and leave citizens much more vulnerable to violent crime.
china.... you really want to list China for gun control laws when they are the BIGGEST violator of human rights in the world and are in an active government sponsored genocide....
Yes they are and if we were talking about Human rights or State sponsored Genocide, then you might have a point, but we arentThis is Japan. Nobody steals the money. This would never happen in America. Why? pic.twitter.com/dhcXYAF8Uh
— E (@ElijahSchaffer) March 27, 2023
If you did this in a major city in the US, there would be fighting or even bloodshed over the money. Japan has horrible living wages and labor and they still don't tear each other apart.
The Nanjing massacre is literally THE WORST atrocity committed by mankind.
I don't even want to write about what they did to infants.
Yeah, while an honest media would help, I'm not sure this is what caused it.Wangchung said:An honest media would have prevented this specific attack. This nut was enraged by all the false claims of anti-trans bills and took it out on Christian children.redfish961 said:
To me, the big question is how do you mitigate these instances and can it realistically be done?
While I think gun regulation could be better, I don't see a ban on particular weapons being of much use. Better regulations would be preferred, in my opinion, rather than any ineffective ban.
Criminals are going to be criminals and they will find a way to circumvent any laws, which they don't care about anyways.
All that being said, as I have stated before, I think the answer is hardening the target. Perhaps figure out ways to enable defense of a school that would discourage an individual from selecting that target.
That's a hard nut to crack because costs and ability may be limited and probably will.
For every reason I can think of a solution, I can think of 2 that would decrease quality of life or take away freedoms.
Do we just consider this type of incident collateral damage or is there something that can truly be done about it?
I wish I could think of the answer, but I'm afraid heartbreak may just be part of the program.
I don't accept that notion.
Reality is, media always has a slant and that's been forever.
I think the operative phrase in your comment is "this nut".
That's truly what you are dealing with and the rest doesn't matter much.
How do you mitigate "the nut"?
That's the root problem.
The only way I can see is to harden the target and that has several disadvantages in itself.
When we faced a much more dramatic example in teh 9/11 terrorists, we literally shut down air travel for a month then hardened the target around the world to a degree that was almost unbelievable - to the point where it became pointless to try to repeat the incident. Eventually, it passed. I think we're going to have to do something like that here - harden schools to the point where this is just really, really difficult. Break the cycle.redfish961 said:Yeah, while an honest media would help, I'm not sure this is what caused it.Wangchung said:An honest media would have prevented this specific attack. This nut was enraged by all the false claims of anti-trans bills and took it out on Christian children.redfish961 said:
To me, the big question is how do you mitigate these instances and can it realistically be done?
While I think gun regulation could be better, I don't see a ban on particular weapons being of much use. Better regulations would be preferred, in my opinion, rather than any ineffective ban.
Criminals are going to be criminals and they will find a way to circumvent any laws, which they don't care about anyways.
All that being said, as I have stated before, I think the answer is hardening the target. Perhaps figure out ways to enable defense of a school that would discourage an individual from selecting that target.
That's a hard nut to crack because costs and ability may be limited and probably will.
For every reason I can think of a solution, I can think of 2 that would decrease quality of life or take away freedoms.
Do we just consider this type of incident collateral damage or is there something that can truly be done about it?
I wish I could think of the answer, but I'm afraid heartbreak may just be part of the program.
I don't accept that notion.
Reality is, media always has a slant and that's been forever.
I think the operative phrase in your comment is "this nut".
That's truly what you are dealing with and the rest doesn't matter much.
How do you mitigate "the nut"?
That's the root problem.
The only way I can see is to harden the target and that has several disadvantages in itself.
Also, we need a national agreement on media treatment of these horrible people. They do this for the attention - the idea that this is the most public middle finger possible. They do it to feel powerful after feeling powerless. Take that from them. NO publicity for these people. Their name is NEVER said. NO pictures, ever. No interviews with their families. You can't force that from a government perspective, but it should be cultural - you do not let them have the thing they want.
This 100%. The same goes with hollywood glorifying serial killers like Ted Bundy.OsoCoreyell said:Also, we need a national agreement on media treatment of these horrible people. They do this for the attention - the idea that this is the most public middle finger possible. They do it to feel powerful after feeling powerless. Take that from them. NO publicity for these people. Their name is NEVER said. NO pictures, ever. No interviews with their families. You can't force that from a government perspective, but it should be cultural - you do not let them have the thing they want.redfish961 said:Yeah, while an honest media would help, I'm not sure this is what caused it.Wangchung said:An honest media would have prevented this specific attack. This nut was enraged by all the false claims of anti-trans bills and took it out on Christian children.redfish961 said:
To me, the big question is how do you mitigate these instances and can it realistically be done?
While I think gun regulation could be better, I don't see a ban on particular weapons being of much use. Better regulations would be preferred, in my opinion, rather than any ineffective ban.
Criminals are going to be criminals and they will find a way to circumvent any laws, which they don't care about anyways.
All that being said, as I have stated before, I think the answer is hardening the target. Perhaps figure out ways to enable defense of a school that would discourage an individual from selecting that target.
That's a hard nut to crack because costs and ability may be limited and probably will.
For every reason I can think of a solution, I can think of 2 that would decrease quality of life or take away freedoms.
Do we just consider this type of incident collateral damage or is there something that can truly be done about it?
I wish I could think of the answer, but I'm afraid heartbreak may just be part of the program.
I don't accept that notion.
Reality is, media always has a slant and that's been forever.
I think the operative phrase in your comment is "this nut".
That's truly what you are dealing with and the rest doesn't matter much.
How do you mitigate "the nut"?
That's the root problem.
The only way I can see is to harden the target and that has several disadvantages in itself.
In most cases Id agree with you but this trans person had a manifesto. The vast majority of media lie and claim "don't say gay" bills exist and that bills restricting children from live adult themed performances, that restrict minors from maiming themselves with hormones and surgery, is really anti trans hatred. It's a straight up lie meant to enrage leftists and it did exactly that, just like all the rhetoric from Obama helped stoke instant protests in America any time a black criminal got hurt or killed while being a criminal.redfish961 said:Yeah, while an honest media would help, I'm not sure this is what caused it.Wangchung said:An honest media would have prevented this specific attack. This nut was enraged by all the false claims of anti-trans bills and took it out on Christian children.redfish961 said:
To me, the big question is how do you mitigate these instances and can it realistically be done?
While I think gun regulation could be better, I don't see a ban on particular weapons being of much use. Better regulations would be preferred, in my opinion, rather than any ineffective ban.
Criminals are going to be criminals and they will find a way to circumvent any laws, which they don't care about anyways.
All that being said, as I have stated before, I think the answer is hardening the target. Perhaps figure out ways to enable defense of a school that would discourage an individual from selecting that target.
That's a hard nut to crack because costs and ability may be limited and probably will.
For every reason I can think of a solution, I can think of 2 that would decrease quality of life or take away freedoms.
Do we just consider this type of incident collateral damage or is there something that can truly be done about it?
I wish I could think of the answer, but I'm afraid heartbreak may just be part of the program.
I don't accept that notion.
Reality is, media always has a slant and that's been forever.
I think the operative phrase in your comment is "this nut".
That's truly what you are dealing with and the rest doesn't matter much.
How do you mitigate "the nut"?
That's the root problem.
The only way I can see is to harden the target and that has several disadvantages in itself.
"Self defense laws are racist! He had his hands up! All cops are *******s! ICE is like the Nazis!" (Followed up by 568 violent blm riots and ICE facilities being firebombed)
"Being against abortion means you hate women!"(Assassination attempt on Justice Kavanaugh followed by illegal protests outside justices homes)
"Being against taking children to watch grown men in women's lingerie dancing erotically means you hate trans people!"
(Followed up by multiple trans/ alphabet cult shootings)
The dots are there to connect.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?
Okay, I appreciate the reply and understand.Wangchung said:In most cases Id agree with you but this trans person had a manifesto. The vast majority of media lie and claim "don't say gay" bills exist and that bills restricting children from live adult themed performances, that restrict minors from maiming themselves with hormones and surgery, is really anti trans hatred. It's a straight up lie meant to enrage leftists and it did exactly that, just like all the rhetoric from Obama helped stoke instant protests in America any time a black criminal got hurt or killed while being a criminal.redfish961 said:Yeah, while an honest media would help, I'm not sure this is what caused it.Wangchung said:An honest media would have prevented this specific attack. This nut was enraged by all the false claims of anti-trans bills and took it out on Christian children.redfish961 said:
To me, the big question is how do you mitigate these instances and can it realistically be done?
While I think gun regulation could be better, I don't see a ban on particular weapons being of much use. Better regulations would be preferred, in my opinion, rather than any ineffective ban.
Criminals are going to be criminals and they will find a way to circumvent any laws, which they don't care about anyways.
All that being said, as I have stated before, I think the answer is hardening the target. Perhaps figure out ways to enable defense of a school that would discourage an individual from selecting that target.
That's a hard nut to crack because costs and ability may be limited and probably will.
For every reason I can think of a solution, I can think of 2 that would decrease quality of life or take away freedoms.
Do we just consider this type of incident collateral damage or is there something that can truly be done about it?
I wish I could think of the answer, but I'm afraid heartbreak may just be part of the program.
I don't accept that notion.
Reality is, media always has a slant and that's been forever.
I think the operative phrase in your comment is "this nut".
That's truly what you are dealing with and the rest doesn't matter much.
How do you mitigate "the nut"?
That's the root problem.
The only way I can see is to harden the target and that has several disadvantages in itself.
"Self defense laws are racist! He had his hands up! All cops are *******s! ICE is like the Nazis!" (Followed up by 568 violent blm riots and ICE facilities being firebombed)
"Being against abortion means you hate women!"(Assassination attempt on Justice Kavanaugh followed by illegal protests outside justices homes)
"Being against taking children to watch grown men in women's lingerie dancing erotically means you hate trans people!"
(Followed up by multiple trans/ alphabet cult shootings)
The dots are there to connect.
At the end of the day, we have to find a solution for this particular problem in order to protect innocent kids.
In my opinion, there will always be some sort of racism, tribalism, or whatever you want to call it.
As humans, we are wired this way, but we don't have to follow it in most instances.
Most of us don't anymore, but it seems like it's the small percentage that drives the bus anymore and that's where we get divided.
The small percentage is loud and vocal and the rest of us just watch and say look at this crazy **** without doing much but observing.
As the country gets more populated, there will be more crazy observed and it's almost inevitable.
We need to harden the targets and I don't see many other options to help mitigate the problem.
You will never cure the problem, but you can mitigate it.
I agree. No one thought we needed bills prohibiting teachers from telling kids about the teacher's sex life and that they can chose their gender because for all of history, we never had to. So the progressives push an agenda to "change society" and "tear down the system," as if any society has ever been radically changed or torn down without the attendant social strife and breakdown. Then when the horrible crap happens, they disclaim responsibility for it by saying that this is the result of some kind of oppression. They make the kids sick in the head and blame others for the crazy stuff that happens. Its disgusting and I'm sick of it.Wangchung said:In most cases Id agree with you but this trans person had a manifesto. The vast majority of media lie and claim "don't say gay" bills exist and that bills restricting children from live adult themed performances, that restrict minors from maiming themselves with hormones and surgery, is really anti trans hatred. It's a straight up lie meant to enrage leftists and it did exactly that, just like all the rhetoric from Obama helped stoke instant protests in America any time a black criminal got hurt or killed while being a criminal.redfish961 said:Yeah, while an honest media would help, I'm not sure this is what caused it.Wangchung said:An honest media would have prevented this specific attack. This nut was enraged by all the false claims of anti-trans bills and took it out on Christian children.redfish961 said:
To me, the big question is how do you mitigate these instances and can it realistically be done?
While I think gun regulation could be better, I don't see a ban on particular weapons being of much use. Better regulations would be preferred, in my opinion, rather than any ineffective ban.
Criminals are going to be criminals and they will find a way to circumvent any laws, which they don't care about anyways.
All that being said, as I have stated before, I think the answer is hardening the target. Perhaps figure out ways to enable defense of a school that would discourage an individual from selecting that target.
That's a hard nut to crack because costs and ability may be limited and probably will.
For every reason I can think of a solution, I can think of 2 that would decrease quality of life or take away freedoms.
Do we just consider this type of incident collateral damage or is there something that can truly be done about it?
I wish I could think of the answer, but I'm afraid heartbreak may just be part of the program.
I don't accept that notion.
Reality is, media always has a slant and that's been forever.
I think the operative phrase in your comment is "this nut".
That's truly what you are dealing with and the rest doesn't matter much.
How do you mitigate "the nut"?
That's the root problem.
The only way I can see is to harden the target and that has several disadvantages in itself.
"Self defense laws are racist! He had his hands up! All cops are *******s! ICE is like the Nazis!" (Followed up by 568 violent blm riots and ICE facilities being firebombed)
"Being against abortion means you hate women!"(Assassination attempt on Justice Kavanaugh followed by illegal protests outside justices homes)
"Being against taking children to watch grown men in women's lingerie dancing erotically means you hate trans people!"
(Followed up by multiple trans/ alphabet cult shootings)
The dots are there to connect.
Horrific, but not even top 5 maybe even 10.Doc Holliday said:Yep.ron.reagan said:Maybe they got all the bad out in those few decades of committing the worst atrocities in human historycowboycwr said:We can learn a lot from Japan. Like how during the WBC a home run ball was passed around the crowd for people to take pictures with it and returned to the person who caught it. Or how their crowd cleans up the stadium after a world cup match or Olympic event (even areas they were not sitting in or even how their kids spend part of the day cleaning their own schools.Doc Holliday said:I don't think you understand how deplorable people in the US are.cms186 said:Sorry, you are (semi) correct, there is one other country other 40, Yemencowboycwr said:False- there are other countries with over 40 per 100 people. But don't let facts ruin your talking points.cms186 said:Mexico has strict Gun Laws (though there are still an estimated 15 guns per 100 people in Mexico, which is about average compared to most other countries in the world, the ONLY country in the world with more than 40 guns per 100 people in population is the USA), sure, and a poorly combatted problem with organised crime, what about ALL the other countries with strict gun control laws, like Australia, Singapore, the UK, Germany, France, Japan, China etc.?RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:Mexico has the strictest gun control laws in all of the world. Their country of 126 million people had a total of 30,968 homicides in 2022. The United States, made up of 327 million people, had 26,031 homicides in 2022.cms186 said:Well the details on this particular incident aren't even known yet, so knowing what would have stopped "this" isnt possiblebearsocal said:What purposed gun control measure would have stopped this?cms186 said:no, you're right, im sure your thoughts and prayers will be enoughchriscbear said:
More gun control needed obviously.
Strict gun control laws only embolden the criminals and leave citizens much more vulnerable to violent crime.
china.... you really want to list China for gun control laws when they are the BIGGEST violator of human rights in the world and are in an active government sponsored genocide....
Yes they are and if we were talking about Human rights or State sponsored Genocide, then you might have a point, but we arentThis is Japan. Nobody steals the money. This would never happen in America. Why? pic.twitter.com/dhcXYAF8Uh
— E (@ElijahSchaffer) March 27, 2023
If you did this in a major city in the US, there would be fighting or even bloodshed over the money. Japan has horrible living wages and labor and they still don't tear each other apart.
The Nanjing massacre is literally THE WORST atrocity committed by mankind.
If consider what they did to China, Korea, and the Philippines it doesn't get any worse. There isn't as much proof but Philippines might have had it the worse as they were stuck between Japan causing as much psychological harm to the population as they possibly could and the US military trying to make a statement.ATL Bear said:Horrific, but not even top 5 maybe even 10.Doc Holliday said:Yep.ron.reagan said:Maybe they got all the bad out in those few decades of committing the worst atrocities in human historycowboycwr said:We can learn a lot from Japan. Like how during the WBC a home run ball was passed around the crowd for people to take pictures with it and returned to the person who caught it. Or how their crowd cleans up the stadium after a world cup match or Olympic event (even areas they were not sitting in or even how their kids spend part of the day cleaning their own schools.Doc Holliday said:I don't think you understand how deplorable people in the US are.cms186 said:Sorry, you are (semi) correct, there is one other country other 40, Yemencowboycwr said:False- there are other countries with over 40 per 100 people. But don't let facts ruin your talking points.cms186 said:Mexico has strict Gun Laws (though there are still an estimated 15 guns per 100 people in Mexico, which is about average compared to most other countries in the world, the ONLY country in the world with more than 40 guns per 100 people in population is the USA), sure, and a poorly combatted problem with organised crime, what about ALL the other countries with strict gun control laws, like Australia, Singapore, the UK, Germany, France, Japan, China etc.?RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:Mexico has the strictest gun control laws in all of the world. Their country of 126 million people had a total of 30,968 homicides in 2022. The United States, made up of 327 million people, had 26,031 homicides in 2022.cms186 said:Well the details on this particular incident aren't even known yet, so knowing what would have stopped "this" isnt possiblebearsocal said:What purposed gun control measure would have stopped this?cms186 said:no, you're right, im sure your thoughts and prayers will be enoughchriscbear said:
More gun control needed obviously.
Strict gun control laws only embolden the criminals and leave citizens much more vulnerable to violent crime.
china.... you really want to list China for gun control laws when they are the BIGGEST violator of human rights in the world and are in an active government sponsored genocide....
Yes they are and if we were talking about Human rights or State sponsored Genocide, then you might have a point, but we arentThis is Japan. Nobody steals the money. This would never happen in America. Why? pic.twitter.com/dhcXYAF8Uh
— E (@ElijahSchaffer) March 27, 2023
If you did this in a major city in the US, there would be fighting or even bloodshed over the money. Japan has horrible living wages and labor and they still don't tear each other apart.
The Nanjing massacre is literally THE WORST atrocity committed by mankind.
Can we just agree that was abhorrent to all decency and absolutely inhuman?ATL Bear said:Horrific, but not even top 5 maybe even 10.Doc Holliday said:Yep.ron.reagan said:Maybe they got all the bad out in those few decades of committing the worst atrocities in human historycowboycwr said:We can learn a lot from Japan. Like how during the WBC a home run ball was passed around the crowd for people to take pictures with it and returned to the person who caught it. Or how their crowd cleans up the stadium after a world cup match or Olympic event (even areas they were not sitting in or even how their kids spend part of the day cleaning their own schools.Doc Holliday said:I don't think you understand how deplorable people in the US are.cms186 said:Sorry, you are (semi) correct, there is one other country other 40, Yemencowboycwr said:False- there are other countries with over 40 per 100 people. But don't let facts ruin your talking points.cms186 said:Mexico has strict Gun Laws (though there are still an estimated 15 guns per 100 people in Mexico, which is about average compared to most other countries in the world, the ONLY country in the world with more than 40 guns per 100 people in population is the USA), sure, and a poorly combatted problem with organised crime, what about ALL the other countries with strict gun control laws, like Australia, Singapore, the UK, Germany, France, Japan, China etc.?RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:Mexico has the strictest gun control laws in all of the world. Their country of 126 million people had a total of 30,968 homicides in 2022. The United States, made up of 327 million people, had 26,031 homicides in 2022.cms186 said:Well the details on this particular incident aren't even known yet, so knowing what would have stopped "this" isnt possiblebearsocal said:What purposed gun control measure would have stopped this?cms186 said:no, you're right, im sure your thoughts and prayers will be enoughchriscbear said:
More gun control needed obviously.
Strict gun control laws only embolden the criminals and leave citizens much more vulnerable to violent crime.
china.... you really want to list China for gun control laws when they are the BIGGEST violator of human rights in the world and are in an active government sponsored genocide....
Yes they are and if we were talking about Human rights or State sponsored Genocide, then you might have a point, but we arentThis is Japan. Nobody steals the money. This would never happen in America. Why? pic.twitter.com/dhcXYAF8Uh
— E (@ElijahSchaffer) March 27, 2023
If you did this in a major city in the US, there would be fighting or even bloodshed over the money. Japan has horrible living wages and labor and they still don't tear each other apart.
The Nanjing massacre is literally THE WORST atrocity committed by mankind.
Let's leave rankings for Sports and Rock Albums.
"I have no idea...I am more interested in chocolate chip ice cream!"
Asked to respond to GOP Senator Josh Hawley's claim he believes Christians were targeted in Monday's school shooting in Nashville, TN, Biden tells reporters at the White House, "Well, I probably don't then," before clarifying, "No, I'm joking-- I have no idea." pic.twitter.com/7BfVbdbXmN
— DJ Judd (@DJJudd) March 28, 2023
Jack Bauer said:
"I have no idea...I am more interested in chocolate chip ice cream!"Asked to respond to GOP Senator Josh Hawley's claim he believes Christians were targeted in Monday's school shooting in Nashville, TN, Biden tells reporters at the White House, "Well, I probably don't then," before clarifying, "No, I'm joking-- I have no idea." pic.twitter.com/7BfVbdbXmN
— DJ Judd (@DJJudd) March 28, 2023
Pretty cringe worthy for him to be making a political joke in this context.
Don't usually respond to this type of thinking but you're an idiot for saying that the left encourages violence. I'm a Christian and sometimes on the left. I neither encourage violence nor the idiocy of this sort of thing. What were you thinking to post this ? Read a book. Don't just watch Fox. Educate yourself beyond the far right BS. You'll like yourself for it nmuddybrazos said:SIC EM 94 said:
So a transgender freak murders adults and children at a Christian school…are we allowed to bring up "hate crime" or no? Just curiousJust weeks ago Jane Fonda called for the murder of Christians.
— Oli London (@OliLondonTV) March 27, 2023
Harmful rhetoric by Jane and other far left extremists has consequences… #janefona #prayfornashville pic.twitter.com/aauIuqGwcs
This is absolutely a hate crime and should be treated no different than if this was a Jewish synagogue that was shot up. Instead the left ecourages this behavior and there will be no tweet from the ADL condemning this terrorism bc they hate Christians.
Swanni
If you vote Democrat then you damned sure do empower people who incite violence through their rhetoric. You might identify as a non-violent Christian but your votes for Democrats says otherwise.Swanni said:Don't usually respond to this type of thinking but you're an idiot for saying that the left encourages violence. I'm a Christian and sometimes on the left. I neither encourage violence nor the idiocy of this sort of thing. What were you thinking to post this ? Read a book. Don't just watch Fox. Educate yourself beyond the far right BS. You'll like yourself for it nmuddybrazos said:SIC EM 94 said:
So a transgender freak murders adults and children at a Christian school…are we allowed to bring up "hate crime" or no? Just curiousJust weeks ago Jane Fonda called for the murder of Christians.
— Oli London (@OliLondonTV) March 27, 2023
Harmful rhetoric by Jane and other far left extremists has consequences… #janefona #prayfornashville pic.twitter.com/aauIuqGwcs
This is absolutely a hate crime and should be treated no different than if this was a Jewish synagogue that was shot up. Instead the left ecourages this behavior and there will be no tweet from the ADL condemning this terrorism bc they hate Christians.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?
Like Trump empowered the January 6th invasion. Oops, he's a Repub and therefore not capable of violence or encouraging it. I've voted for both parties. Can you say the same? Do you watch anything besides Fox who is being sued for 1.6 Billion for overt defamation? Do you read? Do you even read more than one newspaper? Educate yourself. It's a good thing. There are good right wing thoughts and good left wing things. Oh the evil of not allowing an ASSAULT weapon is repulsive to you. If you need 30 rounds plus to hit anything; you're just a really bad shot. Don't believe anyone should Wangchung tonight. Blocking you so won't be involved in your senseless dialogue.Wangchung said:If you vote Democrat then you damned sure do empower people who incite violence through their rhetoric. You might identify as a non-violent Christian but your votes for Democrats says otherwise.Swanni said:Don't usually respond to this type of thinking but you're an idiot for saying that the left encourages violence. I'm a Christian and sometimes on the left. I neither encourage violence nor the idiocy of this sort of thing. What were you thinking to post this ? Read a book. Don't just watch Fox. Educate yourself beyond the far right BS. You'll like yourself for it nmuddybrazos said:SIC EM 94 said:
So a transgender freak murders adults and children at a Christian school…are we allowed to bring up "hate crime" or no? Just curiousJust weeks ago Jane Fonda called for the murder of Christians.
— Oli London (@OliLondonTV) March 27, 2023
Harmful rhetoric by Jane and other far left extremists has consequences… #janefona #prayfornashville pic.twitter.com/aauIuqGwcs
This is absolutely a hate crime and should be treated no different than if this was a Jewish synagogue that was shot up. Instead the left ecourages this behavior and there will be no tweet from the ADL condemning this terrorism bc they hate Christians.
Swanni
Swanni is quite the Internet Nazi.
We see that a lot in these Biden Days ...
We see that a lot in these Biden Days ...
No politician truly encourages(yet) violence in this country. But both sides sure as hell love to claim the other one does. I think Dems do it more but they also seem to have a broader definition of what violence is, so that tracks.Swanni said:Don't usually respond to this type of thinking but you're an idiot for saying that the left encourages violence. I'm a Christian and sometimes on the left. I neither encourage violence nor the idiocy of this sort of thing. What were you thinking to post this ? Read a book. Don't just watch Fox. Educate yourself beyond the far right BS. You'll like yourself for it nmuddybrazos said:SIC EM 94 said:
So a transgender freak murders adults and children at a Christian school…are we allowed to bring up "hate crime" or no? Just curiousJust weeks ago Jane Fonda called for the murder of Christians.
— Oli London (@OliLondonTV) March 27, 2023
Harmful rhetoric by Jane and other far left extremists has consequences… #janefona #prayfornashville pic.twitter.com/aauIuqGwcs
This is absolutely a hate crime and should be treated no different than if this was a Jewish synagogue that was shot up. Instead the left ecourages this behavior and there will be no tweet from the ADL condemning this terrorism bc they hate Christians.
Don't disagree. It's your fault, no it's yours is the code of media and politicians.bearsocal said:No politician truly encourages(yet) violence in this country. But both sides sure as hell love to claim the other one does. I think Dems do it more but they also seem to have a broader definition of what violence is, so that tracks.Swanni said:Don't usually respond to this type of thinking but you're an idiot for saying that the left encourages violence. I'm a Christian and sometimes on the left. I neither encourage violence nor the idiocy of this sort of thing. What were you thinking to post this ? Read a book. Don't just watch Fox. Educate yourself beyond the far right BS. You'll like yourself for it nmuddybrazos said:SIC EM 94 said:
So a transgender freak murders adults and children at a Christian school…are we allowed to bring up "hate crime" or no? Just curiousJust weeks ago Jane Fonda called for the murder of Christians.
— Oli London (@OliLondonTV) March 27, 2023
Harmful rhetoric by Jane and other far left extremists has consequences… #janefona #prayfornashville pic.twitter.com/aauIuqGwcs
This is absolutely a hate crime and should be treated no different than if this was a Jewish synagogue that was shot up. Instead the left ecourages this behavior and there will be no tweet from the ADL condemning this terrorism bc they hate Christians.
Swanni
Is that like being the Soup Nazi? Your thoughts are yours, but I don't recall me not having the right to my own.Oldbear83 said:
Swanni is quite the Internet Nazi.
We see that a lot in these Biden Days ...
Swanni
A lot of posters here understand that it's a uniparty keeping the people at each others throats so they can make out like bandits. If you think it's a bunch of Fox News junkies and die hard Trump fans, you're mistaken.Swanni said:Like Trump empowered the January 6th invasion. Oops, he's a Repub and therefore not capable of violence or encouraging it. I've voted for both parties. Can you say the same? Do you watch anything besides Fox who is being sued for 1.6 Billion for overt defamation? Do you read? Do you even read more than one newspaper? Educate yourself. It's a good thing. There are good right wing thoughts and good left wing things. Oh the evil of not allowing an ASSAULT weapon is repulsive to you. If you need 30 rounds plus to hit anything; you're just a really bad shot. Don't believe anyone should Wangchung tonight. Blocking you so won't be involved in your senseless dialogue.Wangchung said:If you vote Democrat then you damned sure do empower people who incite violence through their rhetoric. You might identify as a non-violent Christian but your votes for Democrats says otherwise.Swanni said:Don't usually respond to this type of thinking but you're an idiot for saying that the left encourages violence. I'm a Christian and sometimes on the left. I neither encourage violence nor the idiocy of this sort of thing. What were you thinking to post this ? Read a book. Don't just watch Fox. Educate yourself beyond the far right BS. You'll like yourself for it nmuddybrazos said:SIC EM 94 said:
So a transgender freak murders adults and children at a Christian school…are we allowed to bring up "hate crime" or no? Just curiousJust weeks ago Jane Fonda called for the murder of Christians.
— Oli London (@OliLondonTV) March 27, 2023
Harmful rhetoric by Jane and other far left extremists has consequences… #janefona #prayfornashville pic.twitter.com/aauIuqGwcs
This is absolutely a hate crime and should be treated no different than if this was a Jewish synagogue that was shot up. Instead the left ecourages this behavior and there will be no tweet from the ADL condemning this terrorism bc they hate Christians.
Swanni said:Like Trump empowered the January 6th invasion. Oops, he's a Repub and therefore not capable of violence or encouraging it. I've voted for both parties. Can you say the same? Do you watch anything besides Fox who is being sued for 1.6 Billion for overt defamation? Do you read? Do you even read more than one newspaper? Educate yourself. It's a good thing. There are good right wing thoughts and good left wing things. Oh the evil of not allowing an ASSAULT weapon is repulsive to you. If you need 30 rounds plus to hit anything; you're just a really bad shot. Don't believe anyone should Wangchung tonight. Blocking you so won't be involved in your senseless dialogue.Wangchung said:If you vote Democrat then you damned sure do empower people who incite violence through their rhetoric. You might identify as a non-violent Christian but your votes for Democrats says otherwise.Swanni said:Don't usually respond to this type of thinking but you're an idiot for saying that the left encourages violence. I'm a Christian and sometimes on the left. I neither encourage violence nor the idiocy of this sort of thing. What were you thinking to post this ? Read a book. Don't just watch Fox. Educate yourself beyond the far right BS. You'll like yourself for it nmuddybrazos said:SIC EM 94 said:
So a transgender freak murders adults and children at a Christian school…are we allowed to bring up "hate crime" or no? Just curiousJust weeks ago Jane Fonda called for the murder of Christians.
— Oli London (@OliLondonTV) March 27, 2023
Harmful rhetoric by Jane and other far left extremists has consequences… #janefona #prayfornashville pic.twitter.com/aauIuqGwcs
This is absolutely a hate crime and should be treated no different than if this was a Jewish synagogue that was shot up. Instead the left ecourages this behavior and there will be no tweet from the ADL condemning this terrorism bc they hate Christians.
That's a cute rant but actions are far more persuasive than the rant of a halfwit mouthbreather trying to justify supporting abortion, sexual deviancy, violence and still trying to identify as a Christian. The intent behind your democrat votes means nothing when we look at the resulting policy. You vote for kids being mutilated so their parents can have a pet trans monster to show off to their friends so you can call yourself open minded. We see violence from you leftists daily, so spare me your fake outrage over January 6th. Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?