Who's voting from Trumps in the primary?

34,358 Views | 430 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by Doc Holliday
Kingdom Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Sam Lowry said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mafia Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mafia Bear said:

Guy Noir said:

Mafia Bear said:

Guy Noir said:

The_barBEARian said:

Realitybites said:

Wangchung said:

Desantis. Trump only gives democrats cover for statistical impossibilities in the voting results. "Sixty million new voters just appeared and voted for the guy who didn't campaign or engage in debate because Orange Man Bad! 100% of certain districts voted Democrat without even an accidental vote for a republican because orange man bad!"

For better or worse, the Desantis campaign is over.

The next president of the US will be either:

Trump
RFK
Haley
Biden/Harris or whoever the dems replace them with.

Pick your poison.

Trump isnt poison. He is the antidote.
Trump is poison.

First: He is one of the leaders that got us to this point. Already the USA is beginning to be paralyzed because so much money is needed to pay interest on the national debt. The annual debt interest went from about $600 billion to near $1 trillion this last year. There will be no operational funds if the problem is not addressed now.

Second: Trump alienates people on his staff so that I believe he will have a difficult time staffing a quality cabinet.

Third: Trump encouraged citizens to use unproven drugs during COVID 19.

He is poison.



Holy **** we are ****ed. Somebody please tell me this is a bot and no real human truly believes this. Particularly the part about "unproven drug". How do some of you still believe whatever you are told by the establishment/elites. Wake the eff up.
Trump said some pretty stupid things about disinfectant, Invermectin and Hydrocloriquine as treatments for Covid. Those comments by Trump are on record. Look it up.



Smdh. Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin *are* legitimate treatments for COVID. Hydroxychloroquine as a prophylactic when taken with Zinc and Ivermectin immediately after infection with its anti-viral properties. How in the hell are there still people out there that do not know this? The reason they were discredited was because the emergency authorization of the vaccines *required* that there be no other alternative treatments available. Otherwise they would have had to go through the normal protocol of safety trials.



Debunked by Big-Pharma owned media.

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-covid-vaccines-emergency-use-873264912929



FIFY You keep believing Big Pharma-owned media and enjoy that myocarditis that's headed your way.
Harrison Bergeron, do you see what I mean?


I have never read that claim.

Do I think cheap, generic potential treatments were ignored for a Vax Only response - likely. Fauci literally ran the same play with HIV in the 80s and was Enemy #2 among the bathhouse boys. Tens of thousands likely died due to his incompetence.
I was thinking I was on the "Left-Wing Journalist" thread. Point is that mainstream science is never good enough if it doesn't fit the anti-vax narrative.
The fact that mainstream science disproved everything you and other Faucists promoted as disinformation is good enough for me. You're projecting that there is some anti-vax bogeyman - in fact it is the usual opposite where there is a small cadre of vax fundamentalists that hold on to disinformation regardless of the contrary evidence in their lap.

I'll pose a simple question for you. While I think you're a little bit of a zealot on Fauci, you're general reasonable, so I think unlike most other regressives on the page you can formulate an original thought:

Just explain to us why safe, cheap, generic treatments should have been condemned and vilified in the face of a novel pandemic where clearly nobody knew what worked or what they were doing? Can you explain why the same idiots who were zealots around "Sexy Mama" masks from Walmart would prevent the Ronas were so violently opposed to trying actual treatments? There was exponentially more evidence and real medical opinions around hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin efficacy and literally no evidence a "Sexy Mama" mask from Walmart would help - yet the left-wing nut job disinformation machine told sheeple that the Walmart mask would save their life but proven medications would kill them.

Just explain why the LWNJ was freaking out about cheap, generic therapies while promoting Idiocracy-style interventions ... I mean the hippie pizza shop in my daughter's college town still has plexiglass hanging from the register ... you morons actually thought that reduced the risk of infection.
Hydroxychloroquine was briefly authorized for use as a Covid treatment. The authorization was revoked because it was risky and ineffective. Some 12,000 people in the US are estimated to have died during the pandemic from off-label use of HCQ in hospitals. Shortages were also imminent, so the supply needed to be kept for malaria patients and others who really needed it.

Ivermectin was found to have anti-viral effects in vitro, but the doses were far higher than humans could safely consume. Further studies showed no strong evidence that it was beneficial as a Covid treatment. As with HCQ, Ivermectin use was discouraged because the risks outweighed the benefits.

I don't think recommending against a treatment means you're condemning or vilifying it. What was condemned and vilified was the misinformation and disinformation surrounding the issue. Ivermectin studies in particular had more than their fair share of outright fraud. The key research supporting it was quickly retracted for falsifying data, but the hype continued on social media and elsewhere.

Zealots on both sides need to understand masks for what they are. They're a collective measure to slow the spread of the virus and make the pandemic more manageable. They do work in that sense. They don't necessarily give a lot of protection to the individual wearing the mask. They do somewhat, but mostly they protect others. So the more people wear them, the more effective they are.


There is no point in arguing with you. Ivermectin was seen WORLDWIDE to have dramatic positive results. You are just wrong and you can't see it and you use studies like the one where they literally tried to kill people with HCQ by giving them doses that were already known to be lethal because they had already show that HCQ was both effective and also lethal at certain doses. You are lost. You believe the pro-establishment media which literally is owned by the elites who want to depopulate the planet and make you a happy serf. It s pointless to argue with you. You are wrong. And if you and your loved ones keep getting boosted you will eventually be dead wrong. Good luck to you.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mafia Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Sam Lowry said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mafia Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mafia Bear said:

Guy Noir said:

Mafia Bear said:

Guy Noir said:

The_barBEARian said:

Realitybites said:

Wangchung said:

Desantis. Trump only gives democrats cover for statistical impossibilities in the voting results. "Sixty million new voters just appeared and voted for the guy who didn't campaign or engage in debate because Orange Man Bad! 100% of certain districts voted Democrat without even an accidental vote for a republican because orange man bad!"

For better or worse, the Desantis campaign is over.

The next president of the US will be either:

Trump
RFK
Haley
Biden/Harris or whoever the dems replace them with.

Pick your poison.

Trump isnt poison. He is the antidote.
Trump is poison.

First: He is one of the leaders that got us to this point. Already the USA is beginning to be paralyzed because so much money is needed to pay interest on the national debt. The annual debt interest went from about $600 billion to near $1 trillion this last year. There will be no operational funds if the problem is not addressed now.

Second: Trump alienates people on his staff so that I believe he will have a difficult time staffing a quality cabinet.

Third: Trump encouraged citizens to use unproven drugs during COVID 19.

He is poison.



Holy **** we are ****ed. Somebody please tell me this is a bot and no real human truly believes this. Particularly the part about "unproven drug". How do some of you still believe whatever you are told by the establishment/elites. Wake the eff up.
Trump said some pretty stupid things about disinfectant, Invermectin and Hydrocloriquine as treatments for Covid. Those comments by Trump are on record. Look it up.



Smdh. Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin *are* legitimate treatments for COVID. Hydroxychloroquine as a prophylactic when taken with Zinc and Ivermectin immediately after infection with its anti-viral properties. How in the hell are there still people out there that do not know this? The reason they were discredited was because the emergency authorization of the vaccines *required* that there be no other alternative treatments available. Otherwise they would have had to go through the normal protocol of safety trials.



Debunked by Big-Pharma owned media.

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-covid-vaccines-emergency-use-873264912929



FIFY You keep believing Big Pharma-owned media and enjoy that myocarditis that's headed your way.
Harrison Bergeron, do you see what I mean?


I have never read that claim.

Do I think cheap, generic potential treatments were ignored for a Vax Only response - likely. Fauci literally ran the same play with HIV in the 80s and was Enemy #2 among the bathhouse boys. Tens of thousands likely died due to his incompetence.
I was thinking I was on the "Left-Wing Journalist" thread. Point is that mainstream science is never good enough if it doesn't fit the anti-vax narrative.
The fact that mainstream science disproved everything you and other Faucists promoted as disinformation is good enough for me. You're projecting that there is some anti-vax bogeyman - in fact it is the usual opposite where there is a small cadre of vax fundamentalists that hold on to disinformation regardless of the contrary evidence in their lap.

I'll pose a simple question for you. While I think you're a little bit of a zealot on Fauci, you're general reasonable, so I think unlike most other regressives on the page you can formulate an original thought:

Just explain to us why safe, cheap, generic treatments should have been condemned and vilified in the face of a novel pandemic where clearly nobody knew what worked or what they were doing? Can you explain why the same idiots who were zealots around "Sexy Mama" masks from Walmart would prevent the Ronas were so violently opposed to trying actual treatments? There was exponentially more evidence and real medical opinions around hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin efficacy and literally no evidence a "Sexy Mama" mask from Walmart would help - yet the left-wing nut job disinformation machine told sheeple that the Walmart mask would save their life but proven medications would kill them.

Just explain why the LWNJ was freaking out about cheap, generic therapies while promoting Idiocracy-style interventions ... I mean the hippie pizza shop in my daughter's college town still has plexiglass hanging from the register ... you morons actually thought that reduced the risk of infection.
Hydroxychloroquine was briefly authorized for use as a Covid treatment. The authorization was revoked because it was risky and ineffective. Some 12,000 people in the US are estimated to have died during the pandemic from off-label use of HCQ in hospitals. Shortages were also imminent, so the supply needed to be kept for malaria patients and others who really needed it.

Ivermectin was found to have anti-viral effects in vitro, but the doses were far higher than humans could safely consume. Further studies showed no strong evidence that it was beneficial as a Covid treatment. As with HCQ, Ivermectin use was discouraged because the risks outweighed the benefits.

I don't think recommending against a treatment means you're condemning or vilifying it. What was condemned and vilified was the misinformation and disinformation surrounding the issue. Ivermectin studies in particular had more than their fair share of outright fraud. The key research supporting it was quickly retracted for falsifying data, but the hype continued on social media and elsewhere.

Zealots on both sides need to understand masks for what they are. They're a collective measure to slow the spread of the virus and make the pandemic more manageable. They do work in that sense. They don't necessarily give a lot of protection to the individual wearing the mask. They do somewhat, but mostly they protect others. So the more people wear them, the more effective they are.


There is no point in arguing with you. Ivermectin was seen WORLDWIDE to have dramatic positive results. You are just wrong and you can't see it and you use studies like the one where they literally tried to kill people with HCQ by giving them doses that were already known to be lethal because they had already show that HCQ was both effective and also lethal at certain doses. You are lost. You believe the pro-establishment media which literally is owned by the elites who want to depopulate the planet and make you a happy serf. It s pointless to argue with you. You are wrong. And if you and your loved ones keep getting boosted you will eventually be dead wrong. Good luck to you.
There you go again. Covid denialists love to pretend they're backed up by mainstream science, but as soon as they get a look at it they cry "conspiracy" and cover their ears.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kingdom Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Mafia Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Sam Lowry said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mafia Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mafia Bear said:

Guy Noir said:

Mafia Bear said:

Guy Noir said:

The_barBEARian said:

Realitybites said:

Wangchung said:

Desantis. Trump only gives democrats cover for statistical impossibilities in the voting results. "Sixty million new voters just appeared and voted for the guy who didn't campaign or engage in debate because Orange Man Bad! 100% of certain districts voted Democrat without even an accidental vote for a republican because orange man bad!"

For better or worse, the Desantis campaign is over.

The next president of the US will be either:

Trump
RFK
Haley
Biden/Harris or whoever the dems replace them with.

Pick your poison.

Trump isnt poison. He is the antidote.
Trump is poison.

First: He is one of the leaders that got us to this point. Already the USA is beginning to be paralyzed because so much money is needed to pay interest on the national debt. The annual debt interest went from about $600 billion to near $1 trillion this last year. There will be no operational funds if the problem is not addressed now.

Second: Trump alienates people on his staff so that I believe he will have a difficult time staffing a quality cabinet.

Third: Trump encouraged citizens to use unproven drugs during COVID 19.

He is poison.



Holy **** we are ****ed. Somebody please tell me this is a bot and no real human truly believes this. Particularly the part about "unproven drug". How do some of you still believe whatever you are told by the establishment/elites. Wake the eff up.
Trump said some pretty stupid things about disinfectant, Invermectin and Hydrocloriquine as treatments for Covid. Those comments by Trump are on record. Look it up.



Smdh. Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin *are* legitimate treatments for COVID. Hydroxychloroquine as a prophylactic when taken with Zinc and Ivermectin immediately after infection with its anti-viral properties. How in the hell are there still people out there that do not know this? The reason they were discredited was because the emergency authorization of the vaccines *required* that there be no other alternative treatments available. Otherwise they would have had to go through the normal protocol of safety trials.



Debunked by Big-Pharma owned media.

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-covid-vaccines-emergency-use-873264912929



FIFY You keep believing Big Pharma-owned media and enjoy that myocarditis that's headed your way.
Harrison Bergeron, do you see what I mean?


I have never read that claim.

Do I think cheap, generic potential treatments were ignored for a Vax Only response - likely. Fauci literally ran the same play with HIV in the 80s and was Enemy #2 among the bathhouse boys. Tens of thousands likely died due to his incompetence.
I was thinking I was on the "Left-Wing Journalist" thread. Point is that mainstream science is never good enough if it doesn't fit the anti-vax narrative.
The fact that mainstream science disproved everything you and other Faucists promoted as disinformation is good enough for me. You're projecting that there is some anti-vax bogeyman - in fact it is the usual opposite where there is a small cadre of vax fundamentalists that hold on to disinformation regardless of the contrary evidence in their lap.

I'll pose a simple question for you. While I think you're a little bit of a zealot on Fauci, you're general reasonable, so I think unlike most other regressives on the page you can formulate an original thought:

Just explain to us why safe, cheap, generic treatments should have been condemned and vilified in the face of a novel pandemic where clearly nobody knew what worked or what they were doing? Can you explain why the same idiots who were zealots around "Sexy Mama" masks from Walmart would prevent the Ronas were so violently opposed to trying actual treatments? There was exponentially more evidence and real medical opinions around hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin efficacy and literally no evidence a "Sexy Mama" mask from Walmart would help - yet the left-wing nut job disinformation machine told sheeple that the Walmart mask would save their life but proven medications would kill them.

Just explain why the LWNJ was freaking out about cheap, generic therapies while promoting Idiocracy-style interventions ... I mean the hippie pizza shop in my daughter's college town still has plexiglass hanging from the register ... you morons actually thought that reduced the risk of infection.
Hydroxychloroquine was briefly authorized for use as a Covid treatment. The authorization was revoked because it was risky and ineffective. Some 12,000 people in the US are estimated to have died during the pandemic from off-label use of HCQ in hospitals. Shortages were also imminent, so the supply needed to be kept for malaria patients and others who really needed it.

Ivermectin was found to have anti-viral effects in vitro, but the doses were far higher than humans could safely consume. Further studies showed no strong evidence that it was beneficial as a Covid treatment. As with HCQ, Ivermectin use was discouraged because the risks outweighed the benefits.

I don't think recommending against a treatment means you're condemning or vilifying it. What was condemned and vilified was the misinformation and disinformation surrounding the issue. Ivermectin studies in particular had more than their fair share of outright fraud. The key research supporting it was quickly retracted for falsifying data, but the hype continued on social media and elsewhere.

Zealots on both sides need to understand masks for what they are. They're a collective measure to slow the spread of the virus and make the pandemic more manageable. They do work in that sense. They don't necessarily give a lot of protection to the individual wearing the mask. They do somewhat, but mostly they protect others. So the more people wear them, the more effective they are.


There is no point in arguing with you. Ivermectin was seen WORLDWIDE to have dramatic positive results. You are just wrong and you can't see it and you use studies like the one where they literally tried to kill people with HCQ by giving them doses that were already known to be lethal because they had already show that HCQ was both effective and also lethal at certain doses. You are lost. You believe the pro-establishment media which literally is owned by the elites who want to depopulate the planet and make you a happy serf. It s pointless to argue with you. You are wrong. And if you and your loved ones keep getting boosted you will eventually be dead wrong. Good luck to you.
There you go again. Covid denialists love to pretend they're backed up by mainstream science, but as soon as they get a look at it they cry "conspiracy" and cover their ears.


That's because it *is* a ****ing conspiracy. The WEF is real. Their agenda is explicit and very real. Their use of vaccines, climate change scams, attacks on national sovereignty, and CBDCs to depopulate and communize the world, respectfully, is very real. You need to wake the **** up before your ignorance gets you and your loved ones killed.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mafia Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mafia Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Sam Lowry said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mafia Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mafia Bear said:

Guy Noir said:

Mafia Bear said:

Guy Noir said:

The_barBEARian said:

Realitybites said:

Wangchung said:

Desantis. Trump only gives democrats cover for statistical impossibilities in the voting results. "Sixty million new voters just appeared and voted for the guy who didn't campaign or engage in debate because Orange Man Bad! 100% of certain districts voted Democrat without even an accidental vote for a republican because orange man bad!"

For better or worse, the Desantis campaign is over.

The next president of the US will be either:

Trump
RFK
Haley
Biden/Harris or whoever the dems replace them with.

Pick your poison.

Trump isnt poison. He is the antidote.
Trump is poison.

First: He is one of the leaders that got us to this point. Already the USA is beginning to be paralyzed because so much money is needed to pay interest on the national debt. The annual debt interest went from about $600 billion to near $1 trillion this last year. There will be no operational funds if the problem is not addressed now.

Second: Trump alienates people on his staff so that I believe he will have a difficult time staffing a quality cabinet.

Third: Trump encouraged citizens to use unproven drugs during COVID 19.

He is poison.



Holy **** we are ****ed. Somebody please tell me this is a bot and no real human truly believes this. Particularly the part about "unproven drug". How do some of you still believe whatever you are told by the establishment/elites. Wake the eff up.
Trump said some pretty stupid things about disinfectant, Invermectin and Hydrocloriquine as treatments for Covid. Those comments by Trump are on record. Look it up.



Smdh. Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin *are* legitimate treatments for COVID. Hydroxychloroquine as a prophylactic when taken with Zinc and Ivermectin immediately after infection with its anti-viral properties. How in the hell are there still people out there that do not know this? The reason they were discredited was because the emergency authorization of the vaccines *required* that there be no other alternative treatments available. Otherwise they would have had to go through the normal protocol of safety trials.



Debunked by Big-Pharma owned media.

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-covid-vaccines-emergency-use-873264912929



FIFY You keep believing Big Pharma-owned media and enjoy that myocarditis that's headed your way.
Harrison Bergeron, do you see what I mean?


I have never read that claim.

Do I think cheap, generic potential treatments were ignored for a Vax Only response - likely. Fauci literally ran the same play with HIV in the 80s and was Enemy #2 among the bathhouse boys. Tens of thousands likely died due to his incompetence.
I was thinking I was on the "Left-Wing Journalist" thread. Point is that mainstream science is never good enough if it doesn't fit the anti-vax narrative.
The fact that mainstream science disproved everything you and other Faucists promoted as disinformation is good enough for me. You're projecting that there is some anti-vax bogeyman - in fact it is the usual opposite where there is a small cadre of vax fundamentalists that hold on to disinformation regardless of the contrary evidence in their lap.

I'll pose a simple question for you. While I think you're a little bit of a zealot on Fauci, you're general reasonable, so I think unlike most other regressives on the page you can formulate an original thought:

Just explain to us why safe, cheap, generic treatments should have been condemned and vilified in the face of a novel pandemic where clearly nobody knew what worked or what they were doing? Can you explain why the same idiots who were zealots around "Sexy Mama" masks from Walmart would prevent the Ronas were so violently opposed to trying actual treatments? There was exponentially more evidence and real medical opinions around hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin efficacy and literally no evidence a "Sexy Mama" mask from Walmart would help - yet the left-wing nut job disinformation machine told sheeple that the Walmart mask would save their life but proven medications would kill them.

Just explain why the LWNJ was freaking out about cheap, generic therapies while promoting Idiocracy-style interventions ... I mean the hippie pizza shop in my daughter's college town still has plexiglass hanging from the register ... you morons actually thought that reduced the risk of infection.
Hydroxychloroquine was briefly authorized for use as a Covid treatment. The authorization was revoked because it was risky and ineffective. Some 12,000 people in the US are estimated to have died during the pandemic from off-label use of HCQ in hospitals. Shortages were also imminent, so the supply needed to be kept for malaria patients and others who really needed it.

Ivermectin was found to have anti-viral effects in vitro, but the doses were far higher than humans could safely consume. Further studies showed no strong evidence that it was beneficial as a Covid treatment. As with HCQ, Ivermectin use was discouraged because the risks outweighed the benefits.

I don't think recommending against a treatment means you're condemning or vilifying it. What was condemned and vilified was the misinformation and disinformation surrounding the issue. Ivermectin studies in particular had more than their fair share of outright fraud. The key research supporting it was quickly retracted for falsifying data, but the hype continued on social media and elsewhere.

Zealots on both sides need to understand masks for what they are. They're a collective measure to slow the spread of the virus and make the pandemic more manageable. They do work in that sense. They don't necessarily give a lot of protection to the individual wearing the mask. They do somewhat, but mostly they protect others. So the more people wear them, the more effective they are.


There is no point in arguing with you. Ivermectin was seen WORLDWIDE to have dramatic positive results. You are just wrong and you can't see it and you use studies like the one where they literally tried to kill people with HCQ by giving them doses that were already known to be lethal because they had already show that HCQ was both effective and also lethal at certain doses. You are lost. You believe the pro-establishment media which literally is owned by the elites who want to depopulate the planet and make you a happy serf. It s pointless to argue with you. You are wrong. And if you and your loved ones keep getting boosted you will eventually be dead wrong. Good luck to you.
There you go again. Covid denialists love to pretend they're backed up by mainstream science, but as soon as they get a look at it they cry "conspiracy" and cover their ears.


That's because it *is* a ****ing conspiracy. The WEF is real. Their agenda is explicit and very real. Their use of vaccines, climate change scams, attacks on national sovereignty, and CBDCs to depopulate and communize the world, respectfully, is very real. You need to wake the **** up before your ignorance gets you and your loved ones killed.
I'll ask you again. If I said Coca-Cola killed 17 million people, would that be true or false? I mean the WEF wants to depopulate the world, so it must be true, right?
Kingdom Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Mafia Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mafia Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Sam Lowry said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mafia Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mafia Bear said:

Guy Noir said:

Mafia Bear said:

Guy Noir said:

The_barBEARian said:

Realitybites said:

Wangchung said:

Desantis. Trump only gives democrats cover for statistical impossibilities in the voting results. "Sixty million new voters just appeared and voted for the guy who didn't campaign or engage in debate because Orange Man Bad! 100% of certain districts voted Democrat without even an accidental vote for a republican because orange man bad!"

For better or worse, the Desantis campaign is over.

The next president of the US will be either:

Trump
RFK
Haley
Biden/Harris or whoever the dems replace them with.

Pick your poison.

Trump isnt poison. He is the antidote.
Trump is poison.

First: He is one of the leaders that got us to this point. Already the USA is beginning to be paralyzed because so much money is needed to pay interest on the national debt. The annual debt interest went from about $600 billion to near $1 trillion this last year. There will be no operational funds if the problem is not addressed now.

Second: Trump alienates people on his staff so that I believe he will have a difficult time staffing a quality cabinet.

Third: Trump encouraged citizens to use unproven drugs during COVID 19.

He is poison.



Holy **** we are ****ed. Somebody please tell me this is a bot and no real human truly believes this. Particularly the part about "unproven drug". How do some of you still believe whatever you are told by the establishment/elites. Wake the eff up.
Trump said some pretty stupid things about disinfectant, Invermectin and Hydrocloriquine as treatments for Covid. Those comments by Trump are on record. Look it up.



Smdh. Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin *are* legitimate treatments for COVID. Hydroxychloroquine as a prophylactic when taken with Zinc and Ivermectin immediately after infection with its anti-viral properties. How in the hell are there still people out there that do not know this? The reason they were discredited was because the emergency authorization of the vaccines *required* that there be no other alternative treatments available. Otherwise they would have had to go through the normal protocol of safety trials.



Debunked by Big-Pharma owned media.

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-covid-vaccines-emergency-use-873264912929



FIFY You keep believing Big Pharma-owned media and enjoy that myocarditis that's headed your way.
Harrison Bergeron, do you see what I mean?


I have never read that claim.

Do I think cheap, generic potential treatments were ignored for a Vax Only response - likely. Fauci literally ran the same play with HIV in the 80s and was Enemy #2 among the bathhouse boys. Tens of thousands likely died due to his incompetence.
I was thinking I was on the "Left-Wing Journalist" thread. Point is that mainstream science is never good enough if it doesn't fit the anti-vax narrative.
The fact that mainstream science disproved everything you and other Faucists promoted as disinformation is good enough for me. You're projecting that there is some anti-vax bogeyman - in fact it is the usual opposite where there is a small cadre of vax fundamentalists that hold on to disinformation regardless of the contrary evidence in their lap.

I'll pose a simple question for you. While I think you're a little bit of a zealot on Fauci, you're general reasonable, so I think unlike most other regressives on the page you can formulate an original thought:

Just explain to us why safe, cheap, generic treatments should have been condemned and vilified in the face of a novel pandemic where clearly nobody knew what worked or what they were doing? Can you explain why the same idiots who were zealots around "Sexy Mama" masks from Walmart would prevent the Ronas were so violently opposed to trying actual treatments? There was exponentially more evidence and real medical opinions around hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin efficacy and literally no evidence a "Sexy Mama" mask from Walmart would help - yet the left-wing nut job disinformation machine told sheeple that the Walmart mask would save their life but proven medications would kill them.

Just explain why the LWNJ was freaking out about cheap, generic therapies while promoting Idiocracy-style interventions ... I mean the hippie pizza shop in my daughter's college town still has plexiglass hanging from the register ... you morons actually thought that reduced the risk of infection.
Hydroxychloroquine was briefly authorized for use as a Covid treatment. The authorization was revoked because it was risky and ineffective. Some 12,000 people in the US are estimated to have died during the pandemic from off-label use of HCQ in hospitals. Shortages were also imminent, so the supply needed to be kept for malaria patients and others who really needed it.

Ivermectin was found to have anti-viral effects in vitro, but the doses were far higher than humans could safely consume. Further studies showed no strong evidence that it was beneficial as a Covid treatment. As with HCQ, Ivermectin use was discouraged because the risks outweighed the benefits.

I don't think recommending against a treatment means you're condemning or vilifying it. What was condemned and vilified was the misinformation and disinformation surrounding the issue. Ivermectin studies in particular had more than their fair share of outright fraud. The key research supporting it was quickly retracted for falsifying data, but the hype continued on social media and elsewhere.

Zealots on both sides need to understand masks for what they are. They're a collective measure to slow the spread of the virus and make the pandemic more manageable. They do work in that sense. They don't necessarily give a lot of protection to the individual wearing the mask. They do somewhat, but mostly they protect others. So the more people wear them, the more effective they are.


There is no point in arguing with you. Ivermectin was seen WORLDWIDE to have dramatic positive results. You are just wrong and you can't see it and you use studies like the one where they literally tried to kill people with HCQ by giving them doses that were already known to be lethal because they had already show that HCQ was both effective and also lethal at certain doses. You are lost. You believe the pro-establishment media which literally is owned by the elites who want to depopulate the planet and make you a happy serf. It s pointless to argue with you. You are wrong. And if you and your loved ones keep getting boosted you will eventually be dead wrong. Good luck to you.
There you go again. Covid denialists love to pretend they're backed up by mainstream science, but as soon as they get a look at it they cry "conspiracy" and cover their ears.


That's because it *is* a ****ing conspiracy. The WEF is real. Their agenda is explicit and very real. Their use of vaccines, climate change scams, attacks on national sovereignty, and CBDCs to depopulate and communize the world, respectfully, is very real. You need to wake the **** up before your ignorance gets you and your loved ones killed.
I'll ask you again. If I said Coca-Cola killed 17 million people, would that be true or false? I mean the WEF wants to depopulate the world, so it must be true, right?


"Do not answer a fool according to his folly, or you yourself will be just like him."
Proverbs 26:4
Kingdom Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I offer you that when Naomi Wolf looks like a right winger, something has gone incredibly wrong.

J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnny Bear said:

4th and Inches said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Every election since post- President Washington the electorate has always shouted "There are no good candidates. I'll vote the lesser of two evils."
I'll vote for the candidate who tends to respect the humanity of its citizens in word and policy. Biden's my guy
bc he's a good guy and respects all the citizens he serves

We talking about the same Joe Biden that believes roughly half the country are fascists?

https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-biden-donald-trump-presidential-pennsylvania-edd46881a1c0c71df97663ac37236f26

Yes, that certainly sounds like a great guy who respect all citizens.
"all citizens he serves." he doesnt serve the MAGA crowd or the fly overs. He has made that abundantly clear many times over the last 3 years. People should believe him.

He "serves" nothing more than his own and his family's wholly corrupt desires and ambitions, period. Anyone that can't see that is either hopelessly brainwashed and/or dumbed down, or they don't have a fully functioning brain.
and Trumps doesn't? please.
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well said, Sam. Your best post on this thread.
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

Every election since post- President Washington the electorate has always shouted "There are no good candidates. I'll vote the lesser of two evils."
I'll vote for the candidate who tends to respect the humanity of its citizens in word and policy. Biden's my guy
bc he's a good guy and respects all the citizens he serves


Yes he respects the citizens he serves.... the ones from foreign countries laundering the most money through his crackhead son. Joe Biden is a mercenary his respect is for sale to whoever is filling his off-shore banks accounts at any time.

Nicki Haley, same thing.
Why repeat a lie? You have no proof just assertion

If that were true why didnt the FBI relase Hunter Biden's laptop to congress?
Still a lie. You have no evidence of what's on that laptop. Besides one of your own found it. Why didn't he make a copy?


Didn't crackhead Hunter's former business partner flip on him and did an interview stating it all the allegations were true?
Not the allegation that President Biden interfered.
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

Every election since post- President Washington the electorate has always shouted "There are no good candidates. I'll vote the lesser of two evils."
I'll vote for the candidate who tends to respect the humanity of its citizens in word and policy. Biden's my guy
bc he's a good guy and respects all the citizens he serves


Yes he respects the citizens he serves.... the ones from foreign countries laundering the most money through his crackhead son. Joe Biden is a mercenary his respect is for sale to whoever is filling his off-shore banks accounts at any time.

Nicki Haley, same thing.
Why repeat a lie? You have no proof just assertion

If that were true why didnt the FBI relase Hunter Biden's laptop to congress?
Still a lie. You have no evidence of what's on that laptop. Besides one of your own found it. Why didn't he make a copy?


Didn't crackhead Hunter's former business partner flip on him and did an interview stating it all the allegations were true?
Not the allegation that President Biden interfered.


A some point we just have to face the fact that it is a near certainty that our president is a crook, whether someone can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law or not. Whether it is the people's choice for that crook to be in office or for someone else to be there, perhaps another crook, is what the election will decide.
Johnny Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

Johnny Bear said:

4th and Inches said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Every election since post- President Washington the electorate has always shouted "There are no good candidates. I'll vote the lesser of two evils."
I'll vote for the candidate who tends to respect the humanity of its citizens in word and policy. Biden's my guy
bc he's a good guy and respects all the citizens he serves

We talking about the same Joe Biden that believes roughly half the country are fascists?

https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-biden-donald-trump-presidential-pennsylvania-edd46881a1c0c71df97663ac37236f26

Yes, that certainly sounds like a great guy who respect all citizens.
"all citizens he serves." he doesnt serve the MAGA crowd or the fly overs. He has made that abundantly clear many times over the last 3 years. People should believe him.

He "serves" nothing more than his own and his family's wholly corrupt desires and ambitions, period. Anyone that can't see that is either hopelessly brainwashed and/or dumbed down, or they don't have a fully functioning brain.
and Trumps doesn't? please.

You really have a sick obsession with Trump and you should seek professional help for it. And also increase the dosage of your TDS meds.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Mafia Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Sam Lowry said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mafia Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mafia Bear said:

Guy Noir said:

Mafia Bear said:

Guy Noir said:

The_barBEARian said:

Realitybites said:

Wangchung said:

Desantis. Trump only gives democrats cover for statistical impossibilities in the voting results. "Sixty million new voters just appeared and voted for the guy who didn't campaign or engage in debate because Orange Man Bad! 100% of certain districts voted Democrat without even an accidental vote for a republican because orange man bad!"

For better or worse, the Desantis campaign is over.

The next president of the US will be either:

Trump
RFK
Haley
Biden/Harris or whoever the dems replace them with.

Pick your poison.

Trump isnt poison. He is the antidote.
Trump is poison.

First: He is one of the leaders that got us to this point. Already the USA is beginning to be paralyzed because so much money is needed to pay interest on the national debt. The annual debt interest went from about $600 billion to near $1 trillion this last year. There will be no operational funds if the problem is not addressed now.

Second: Trump alienates people on his staff so that I believe he will have a difficult time staffing a quality cabinet.

Third: Trump encouraged citizens to use unproven drugs during COVID 19.

He is poison.



Holy **** we are ****ed. Somebody please tell me this is a bot and no real human truly believes this. Particularly the part about "unproven drug". How do some of you still believe whatever you are told by the establishment/elites. Wake the eff up.
Trump said some pretty stupid things about disinfectant, Invermectin and Hydrocloriquine as treatments for Covid. Those comments by Trump are on record. Look it up.



Smdh. Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin *are* legitimate treatments for COVID. Hydroxychloroquine as a prophylactic when taken with Zinc and Ivermectin immediately after infection with its anti-viral properties. How in the hell are there still people out there that do not know this? The reason they were discredited was because the emergency authorization of the vaccines *required* that there be no other alternative treatments available. Otherwise they would have had to go through the normal protocol of safety trials.



Debunked by Big-Pharma owned media.

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-covid-vaccines-emergency-use-873264912929



FIFY You keep believing Big Pharma-owned media and enjoy that myocarditis that's headed your way.
Harrison Bergeron, do you see what I mean?


I have never read that claim.

Do I think cheap, generic potential treatments were ignored for a Vax Only response - likely. Fauci literally ran the same play with HIV in the 80s and was Enemy #2 among the bathhouse boys. Tens of thousands likely died due to his incompetence.
I was thinking I was on the "Left-Wing Journalist" thread. Point is that mainstream science is never good enough if it doesn't fit the anti-vax narrative.
The fact that mainstream science disproved everything you and other Faucists promoted as disinformation is good enough for me. You're projecting that there is some anti-vax bogeyman - in fact it is the usual opposite where there is a small cadre of vax fundamentalists that hold on to disinformation regardless of the contrary evidence in their lap.

I'll pose a simple question for you. While I think you're a little bit of a zealot on Fauci, you're general reasonable, so I think unlike most other regressives on the page you can formulate an original thought:

Just explain to us why safe, cheap, generic treatments should have been condemned and vilified in the face of a novel pandemic where clearly nobody knew what worked or what they were doing? Can you explain why the same idiots who were zealots around "Sexy Mama" masks from Walmart would prevent the Ronas were so violently opposed to trying actual treatments? There was exponentially more evidence and real medical opinions around hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin efficacy and literally no evidence a "Sexy Mama" mask from Walmart would help - yet the left-wing nut job disinformation machine told sheeple that the Walmart mask would save their life but proven medications would kill them.

Just explain why the LWNJ was freaking out about cheap, generic therapies while promoting Idiocracy-style interventions ... I mean the hippie pizza shop in my daughter's college town still has plexiglass hanging from the register ... you morons actually thought that reduced the risk of infection.
Hydroxychloroquine was briefly authorized for use as a Covid treatment. The authorization was revoked because it was risky and ineffective. Some 12,000 people in the US are estimated to have died during the pandemic from off-label use of HCQ in hospitals. Shortages were also imminent, so the supply needed to be kept for malaria patients and others who really needed it.

Ivermectin was found to have anti-viral effects in vitro, but the doses were far higher than humans could safely consume. Further studies showed no strong evidence that it was beneficial as a Covid treatment. As with HCQ, Ivermectin use was discouraged because the risks outweighed the benefits.

I don't think recommending against a treatment means you're condemning or vilifying it. What was condemned and vilified was the misinformation and disinformation surrounding the issue. Ivermectin studies in particular had more than their fair share of outright fraud. The key research supporting it was quickly retracted for falsifying data, but the hype continued on social media and elsewhere.

Zealots on both sides need to understand masks for what they are. They're a collective measure to slow the spread of the virus and make the pandemic more manageable. They do work in that sense. They don't necessarily give a lot of protection to the individual wearing the mask. They do somewhat, but mostly they protect others. So the more people wear them, the more effective they are.


There is no point in arguing with you. Ivermectin was seen WORLDWIDE to have dramatic positive results. You are just wrong and you can't see it and you use studies like the one where they literally tried to kill people with HCQ by giving them doses that were already known to be lethal because they had already show that HCQ was both effective and also lethal at certain doses. You are lost. You believe the pro-establishment media which literally is owned by the elites who want to depopulate the planet and make you a happy serf. It s pointless to argue with you. You are wrong. And if you and your loved ones keep getting boosted you will eventually be dead wrong. Good luck to you.
There you go again. Covid denialists love to pretend they're backed up by mainstream science, but as soon as they get a look at it they cry "conspiracy" and cover their ears.


Is a "covid denialist" a person that lists as a covid death someone killed in a motorcycle accident who may or may not have tested positive for the rona's.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mafia Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Sam Lowry said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mafia Bear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Mafia Bear said:

Guy Noir said:

Mafia Bear said:

Guy Noir said:

The_barBEARian said:

Realitybites said:

Wangchung said:

Desantis. Trump only gives democrats cover for statistical impossibilities in the voting results. "Sixty million new voters just appeared and voted for the guy who didn't campaign or engage in debate because Orange Man Bad! 100% of certain districts voted Democrat without even an accidental vote for a republican because orange man bad!"

For better or worse, the Desantis campaign is over.

The next president of the US will be either:

Trump
RFK
Haley
Biden/Harris or whoever the dems replace them with.

Pick your poison.

Trump isnt poison. He is the antidote.
Trump is poison.

First: He is one of the leaders that got us to this point. Already the USA is beginning to be paralyzed because so much money is needed to pay interest on the national debt. The annual debt interest went from about $600 billion to near $1 trillion this last year. There will be no operational funds if the problem is not addressed now.

Second: Trump alienates people on his staff so that I believe he will have a difficult time staffing a quality cabinet.

Third: Trump encouraged citizens to use unproven drugs during COVID 19.

He is poison.



Holy **** we are ****ed. Somebody please tell me this is a bot and no real human truly believes this. Particularly the part about "unproven drug". How do some of you still believe whatever you are told by the establishment/elites. Wake the eff up.
Trump said some pretty stupid things about disinfectant, Invermectin and Hydrocloriquine as treatments for Covid. Those comments by Trump are on record. Look it up.



Smdh. Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin *are* legitimate treatments for COVID. Hydroxychloroquine as a prophylactic when taken with Zinc and Ivermectin immediately after infection with its anti-viral properties. How in the hell are there still people out there that do not know this? The reason they were discredited was because the emergency authorization of the vaccines *required* that there be no other alternative treatments available. Otherwise they would have had to go through the normal protocol of safety trials.



Debunked by Big-Pharma owned media.

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-covid-vaccines-emergency-use-873264912929



FIFY You keep believing Big Pharma-owned media and enjoy that myocarditis that's headed your way.
Harrison Bergeron, do you see what I mean?


I have never read that claim.

Do I think cheap, generic potential treatments were ignored for a Vax Only response - likely. Fauci literally ran the same play with HIV in the 80s and was Enemy #2 among the bathhouse boys. Tens of thousands likely died due to his incompetence.
I was thinking I was on the "Left-Wing Journalist" thread. Point is that mainstream science is never good enough if it doesn't fit the anti-vax narrative.
The fact that mainstream science disproved everything you and other Faucists promoted as disinformation is good enough for me. You're projecting that there is some anti-vax bogeyman - in fact it is the usual opposite where there is a small cadre of vax fundamentalists that hold on to disinformation regardless of the contrary evidence in their lap.

I'll pose a simple question for you. While I think you're a little bit of a zealot on Fauci, you're general reasonable, so I think unlike most other regressives on the page you can formulate an original thought:

Just explain to us why safe, cheap, generic treatments should have been condemned and vilified in the face of a novel pandemic where clearly nobody knew what worked or what they were doing? Can you explain why the same idiots who were zealots around "Sexy Mama" masks from Walmart would prevent the Ronas were so violently opposed to trying actual treatments? There was exponentially more evidence and real medical opinions around hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin efficacy and literally no evidence a "Sexy Mama" mask from Walmart would help - yet the left-wing nut job disinformation machine told sheeple that the Walmart mask would save their life but proven medications would kill them.

Just explain why the LWNJ was freaking out about cheap, generic therapies while promoting Idiocracy-style interventions ... I mean the hippie pizza shop in my daughter's college town still has plexiglass hanging from the register ... you morons actually thought that reduced the risk of infection.
Hydroxychloroquine was briefly authorized for use as a Covid treatment. The authorization was revoked because it was risky and ineffective. Some 12,000 people in the US are estimated to have died during the pandemic from off-label use of HCQ in hospitals. Shortages were also imminent, so the supply needed to be kept for malaria patients and others who really needed it.

Ivermectin was found to have anti-viral effects in vitro, but the doses were far higher than humans could safely consume. Further studies showed no strong evidence that it was beneficial as a Covid treatment. As with HCQ, Ivermectin use was discouraged because the risks outweighed the benefits.

I don't think recommending against a treatment means you're condemning or vilifying it. What was condemned and vilified was the misinformation and disinformation surrounding the issue. Ivermectin studies in particular had more than their fair share of outright fraud. The key research supporting it was quickly retracted for falsifying data, but the hype continued on social media and elsewhere.

Zealots on both sides need to understand masks for what they are. They're a collective measure to slow the spread of the virus and make the pandemic more manageable. They do work in that sense. They don't necessarily give a lot of protection to the individual wearing the mask. They do somewhat, but mostly they protect others. So the more people wear them, the more effective they are.


There is no point in arguing with you. Ivermectin was seen WORLDWIDE to have dramatic positive results. You are just wrong and you can't see it and you use studies like the one where they literally tried to kill people with HCQ by giving them doses that were already known to be lethal because they had already show that HCQ was both effective and also lethal at certain doses. You are lost. You believe the pro-establishment media which literally is owned by the elites who want to depopulate the planet and make you a happy serf. It s pointless to argue with you. You are wrong. And if you and your loved ones keep getting boosted you will eventually be dead wrong. Good luck to you.
There you go again. Covid denialists love to pretend they're backed up by mainstream science, but as soon as they get a look at it they cry "conspiracy" and cover their ears.


Is a "covid denialist" a person that lists as a covid death someone killed in a motorcycle accident who may or may not have tested positive for the rona's.
Yes, because that case is no longer listed as a Covid death. You're the only one who's still counting it.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

Every election since post- President Washington the electorate has always shouted "There are no good candidates. I'll vote the lesser of two evils."
I'll vote for the candidate who tends to respect the humanity of its citizens in word and policy. Biden's my guy
bc he's a good guy and respects all the citizens he serves


Yes he respects the citizens he serves.... the ones from foreign countries laundering the most money through his crackhead son. Joe Biden is a mercenary his respect is for sale to whoever is filling his off-shore banks accounts at any time.

Nicki Haley, same thing.
Why repeat a lie? You have no proof just assertion

If that were true why didnt the FBI relase Hunter Biden's laptop to congress?
Still a lie. You have no evidence of what's on that laptop. Besides one of your own found it. Why didn't he make a copy?


Didn't crackhead Hunter's former business partner flip on him and did an interview stating it all the allegations were true?
Not the allegation that President Biden interfered.


A some point we just have to face the fact that it is a near certainty that our president is a crook, whether someone can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law or not. Whether it is the people's choice for that crook to be in office or for someone else to be there, perhaps another crook, is what the election will decide.
Biden is not a crook. "Nearly certain " is assertion without proof. Where is your evidence?
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

Every election since post- President Washington the electorate has always shouted "There are no good candidates. I'll vote the lesser of two evils."
I'll vote for the candidate who tends to respect the humanity of its citizens in word and policy. Biden's my guy
bc he's a good guy and respects all the citizens he serves


Yes he respects the citizens he serves.... the ones from foreign countries laundering the most money through his crackhead son. Joe Biden is a mercenary his respect is for sale to whoever is filling his off-shore banks accounts at any time.

Nicki Haley, same thing.
Why repeat a lie? You have no proof just assertion

If that were true why didnt the FBI relase Hunter Biden's laptop to congress?
Still a lie. You have no evidence of what's on that laptop. Besides one of your own found it. Why didn't he make a copy?


Didn't crackhead Hunter's former business partner flip on him and did an interview stating it all the allegations were true?
Not the allegation that President Biden interfered.


A some point we just have to face the fact that it is a near certainty that our president is a crook, whether someone can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law or not. Whether it is the people's choice for that crook to be in office or for someone else to be there, perhaps another crook, is what the election will decide.
Biden is not a crook. "Nearly certain " is assertion without proof. Where is your evidence?


I'm not interested in discussing the particulars of the smoke around Joe Biden and his family business. You can google it and explore it for yourself if you are interested, but I doubt if you have any real interest in it. If you do, research it and make the best case you can to show he's a crook. As Harry Truman said, "Show me a man that gets rich by being a politician, and I'll show you a crook."
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

Every election since post- President Washington the electorate has always shouted "There are no good candidates. I'll vote the lesser of two evils."
I'll vote for the candidate who tends to respect the humanity of its citizens in word and policy. Biden's my guy
bc he's a good guy and respects all the citizens he serves


Yes he respects the citizens he serves.... the ones from foreign countries laundering the most money through his crackhead son. Joe Biden is a mercenary his respect is for sale to whoever is filling his off-shore banks accounts at any time.

Nicki Haley, same thing.
Why repeat a lie? You have no proof just assertion

If that were true why didnt the FBI relase Hunter Biden's laptop to congress?
Still a lie. You have no evidence of what's on that laptop. Besides one of your own found it. Why didn't he make a copy?


Didn't crackhead Hunter's former business partner flip on him and did an interview stating it all the allegations were true?
Not the allegation that President Biden interfered.


A some point we just have to face the fact that it is a near certainty that our president is a crook, whether someone can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law or not. Whether it is the people's choice for that crook to be in office or for someone else to be there, perhaps another crook, is what the election will decide.
Biden is not a crook. "Nearly certain " is assertion without proof. Where is your evidence?


I'm not interested in discussing the particulars of the smoke around Joe Biden and his family business. You should because you made the claim, not me.
You can google it and explore it for yourself if you are interested, but I doubt if you have any real interest in it. If you do, research it and make the best case you can to show he's a crook. As Harry Truman said, "Show me a man that gets rich by being a politician, and I'll show you a crook."
Biden show us his tax returns and Trump does not.

D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

Every election since post- President Washington the electorate has always shouted "There are no good candidates. I'll vote the lesser of two evils."
I'll vote for the candidate who tends to respect the humanity of its citizens in word and policy. Biden's my guy
bc he's a good guy and respects all the citizens he serves


Yes he respects the citizens he serves.... the ones from foreign countries laundering the most money through his crackhead son. Joe Biden is a mercenary his respect is for sale to whoever is filling his off-shore banks accounts at any time.

Nicki Haley, same thing.
Why repeat a lie? You have no proof just assertion

If that were true why didnt the FBI relase Hunter Biden's laptop to congress?
Still a lie. You have no evidence of what's on that laptop. Besides one of your own found it. Why didn't he make a copy?


Didn't crackhead Hunter's former business partner flip on him and did an interview stating it all the allegations were true?
Not the allegation that President Biden interfered.


A some point we just have to face the fact that it is a near certainty that our president is a crook, whether someone can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law or not. Whether it is the people's choice for that crook to be in office or for someone else to be there, perhaps another crook, is what the election will decide.
Biden is not a crook. "Nearly certain " is assertion without proof. Where is your evidence?


I'm not interested in discussing the particulars of the smoke around Joe Biden and his family business. You should because you made the claim, not me.
You can google it and explore it for yourself if you are interested, but I doubt if you have any real interest in it. If you do, research it and make the best case you can to show he's a crook. As Harry Truman said, "Show me a man that gets rich by being a politician, and I'll show you a crook."
Biden show us his tax returns and Trump does not.




I've seen enough to be satisfied that the likelihood of Joe Biden being a crook is extremely high. It doesn't make me happy to reach that conclusion and I am not particularly interested in discussing it. Nor am I am morally obligated to discuss it, despite your opinion to the contrary.

There is a lot of information is available for you if you wish to examine it. If you are so inclined, go read up on it yourself.

What Trump is or is not or did or did not do is entirely unrelated to the question of whether Biden is a crook. It is unclear why you mention him in your response.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

Every election since post- President Washington the electorate has always shouted "There are no good candidates. I'll vote the lesser of two evils."
I'll vote for the candidate who tends to respect the humanity of its citizens in word and policy. Biden's my guy
bc he's a good guy and respects all the citizens he serves


Yes he respects the citizens he serves.... the ones from foreign countries laundering the most money through his crackhead son. Joe Biden is a mercenary his respect is for sale to whoever is filling his off-shore banks accounts at any time.

Nicki Haley, same thing.
Why repeat a lie? You have no proof just assertion

If that were true why didnt the FBI relase Hunter Biden's laptop to congress?
Still a lie. You have no evidence of what's on that laptop. Besides one of your own found it. Why didn't he make a copy?


Didn't crackhead Hunter's former business partner flip on him and did an interview stating it all the allegations were true?
Not the allegation that President Biden interfered.


A some point we just have to face the fact that it is a near certainty that our president is a crook, whether someone can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law or not. Whether it is the people's choice for that crook to be in office or for someone else to be there, perhaps another crook, is what the election will decide.
Biden is not a crook. "Nearly certain " is assertion without proof. Where is your evidence?


I'm not interested in discussing the particulars of the smoke around Joe Biden and his family business. You should because you made the claim, not me.
You can google it and explore it for yourself if you are interested, but I doubt if you have any real interest in it. If you do, research it and make the best case you can to show he's a crook. As Harry Truman said, "Show me a man that gets rich by being a politician, and I'll show you a crook."
Biden show us his tax returns and Trump does not.




I've seen enough to be satisfied that the likelihood of Joe Biden being a crook is extremely high. It doesn't make me happy to reach that conclusion and I am not particularly interested in discussing it. Nor am I am morally obligated to discuss it, despite your opinion to the contrary.

There is a lot of information is available for you if you wish to examine it. If you are so inclined, go read up on it yourself.

What Trump is or is not or did or did not do is entirely unrelated to the question of whether Biden is a crook. It is unclear why you mention him in your response. Because the best source are Biden's tax returns. It points the hypocrisy of your standards for judging Presidents.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

Every election since post- President Washington the electorate has always shouted "There are no good candidates. I'll vote the lesser of two evils."
I'll vote for the candidate who tends to respect the humanity of its citizens in word and policy. Biden's my guy
bc he's a good guy and respects all the citizens he serves


Yes he respects the citizens he serves.... the ones from foreign countries laundering the most money through his crackhead son. Joe Biden is a mercenary his respect is for sale to whoever is filling his off-shore banks accounts at any time.

Nicki Haley, same thing.
Why repeat a lie? You have no proof just assertion

If that were true why didnt the FBI relase Hunter Biden's laptop to congress?
Still a lie. You have no evidence of what's on that laptop. Besides one of your own found it. Why didn't he make a copy?


Didn't crackhead Hunter's former business partner flip on him and did an interview stating it all the allegations were true?
Not the allegation that President Biden interfered.


A some point we just have to face the fact that it is a near certainty that our president is a crook, whether someone can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law or not. Whether it is the people's choice for that crook to be in office or for someone else to be there, perhaps another crook, is what the election will decide.
Biden is not a crook. "Nearly certain " is assertion without proof. Where is your evidence?


I'm not interested in discussing the particulars of the smoke around Joe Biden and his family business. You should because you made the claim, not me.
You can google it and explore it for yourself if you are interested, but I doubt if you have any real interest in it. If you do, research it and make the best case you can to show he's a crook. As Harry Truman said, "Show me a man that gets rich by being a politician, and I'll show you a crook."
Biden show us his tax returns and Trump does not.




I've seen enough to be satisfied that the likelihood of Joe Biden being a crook is extremely high. It doesn't make me happy to reach that conclusion and I am not particularly interested in discussing it.


In a perfect situation, who would be your choice to serve as our next president ?


No justification or discussion necessary.

D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

Every election since post- President Washington the electorate has always shouted "There are no good candidates. I'll vote the lesser of two evils."
I'll vote for the candidate who tends to respect the humanity of its citizens in word and policy. Biden's my guy
bc he's a good guy and respects all the citizens he serves


Yes he respects the citizens he serves.... the ones from foreign countries laundering the most money through his crackhead son. Joe Biden is a mercenary his respect is for sale to whoever is filling his off-shore banks accounts at any time.

Nicki Haley, same thing.
Why repeat a lie? You have no proof just assertion

If that were true why didnt the FBI relase Hunter Biden's laptop to congress?
Still a lie. You have no evidence of what's on that laptop. Besides one of your own found it. Why didn't he make a copy?


Didn't crackhead Hunter's former business partner flip on him and did an interview stating it all the allegations were true?
Not the allegation that President Biden interfered.


A some point we just have to face the fact that it is a near certainty that our president is a crook, whether someone can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law or not. Whether it is the people's choice for that crook to be in office or for someone else to be there, perhaps another crook, is what the election will decide.
Biden is not a crook. "Nearly certain " is assertion without proof. Where is your evidence?


I'm not interested in discussing the particulars of the smoke around Joe Biden and his family business. You should because you made the claim, not me.
You can google it and explore it for yourself if you are interested, but I doubt if you have any real interest in it. If you do, research it and make the best case you can to show he's a crook. As Harry Truman said, "Show me a man that gets rich by being a politician, and I'll show you a crook."
Biden show us his tax returns and Trump does not.




I've seen enough to be satisfied that the likelihood of Joe Biden being a crook is extremely high. It doesn't make me happy to reach that conclusion and I am not particularly interested in discussing it. Nor am I am morally obligated to discuss it, despite your opinion to the contrary.

There is a lot of information is available for you if you wish to examine it. If you are so inclined, go read up on it yourself.

What Trump is or is not or did or did not do is entirely unrelated to the question of whether Biden is a crook. It is unclear why you mention him in your response. Because the best source are Biden's tax returns. It points the hypocrisy of your standards for judging Presidents.



Is there a line on the 1040 that says "Are you a crook?"

If the "best source" is Biden's tax returns, what does that have to do with Trump being in any way related to my post?

How does my conclusion that Biden is very, very likely a crook point to "hypocrisy" on my part? Please provide some explanation. I could see where one could claim hypocrisy if I looked at someone else with essentially the same level of "smoke" and said "not a crook," but I haven't done that.
BUbearinARK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

Every election since post- President Washington the electorate has always shouted "There are no good candidates. I'll vote the lesser of two evils."
I'll vote for the candidate who tends to respect the humanity of its citizens in word and policy. %A0Biden's my guy
bc he's a good guy and respects all the citizens he serves


Yes he respects the citizens he serves.... the ones from foreign countries laundering the most money through his crackhead son. Joe Biden is a mercenary his respect is for sale to whoever is filling his off-shore banks accounts at any time.

Nicki Haley, same thing.
Why repeat a lie? %A0You have no proof just assertion

If that were true why didnt the FBI relase Hunter Biden's laptop to congress?
Still a lie. %A0You have no evidence of what's on that laptop. %A0Besides one of your own found it. %A0Why didn't he make a copy?


Didn't crackhead Hunter's former business partner flip on him and did an interview stating it all the allegations were true?
Not the allegation that President Biden interfered. %A0


A some point we just have to face the fact that it is a near certainty that our president is a crook, whether someone can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law or not. Whether it is the people's choice for that crook to be in office or for someone else to be there, perhaps another crook, is what the election will decide.
Biden is not a crook. "Nearly certain " is assertion without proof. Where is your evidence?


I'm not interested in discussing the particulars of the smoke around Joe Biden and his family business. You should because you made the claim, not me.
You can google it and explore it for yourself if you are interested, but I doubt if you have any real interest in it. If you do, research it and make the best case you can to show he's a crook. As Harry Truman said, "Show me a man that gets rich by being a politician, and I'll show you a crook." %A0
Biden show us his tax returns and Trump does not.




I've seen enough to be satisfied that the likelihood of Joe Biden being a crook is extremely high. It doesn't make me happy to reach that conclusion and I am not particularly interested in discussing it. Nor am I am morally obligated to discuss it, despite your opinion to the contrary.

There is a lot of information is available for you if you wish to examine it. If you are so inclined, go read up on it yourself.

What Trump is or is not or did or did not do is entirely %A0unrelated to the question of whether Biden is a crook. It is unclear why you mention him in your response. Because the best source are Biden's tax returns. It points the hypocrisy of your standards for judging Presidents.



Is there a line on the 1040 that says "Are you a crook?"

If the "best source" is Biden's tax returns, what does that have to do with Trump being in any way related to my post?

How does my conclusion that Biden is very, very likely a crook point to "hypocrisy" on my part? Please provide some explanation. I could see where one could claim hypocrisy if I looked at someone else with essentially the same level of "smoke" and said "not a crook," but I haven't done that.
On the line where the 1040EZ asks if you took any impermissible funds or gifts from foreign sources it reads NO! C'mon man! Enough for me!! Leave the Big Guy alone. Sweet and innocent as the pure driven snow I say.
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

Every election since post- President Washington the electorate has always shouted "There are no good candidates. I'll vote the lesser of two evils."
I'll vote for the candidate who tends to respect the humanity of its citizens in word and policy. Biden's my guy
bc he's a good guy and respects all the citizens he serves


Yes he respects the citizens he serves.... the ones from foreign countries laundering the most money through his crackhead son. Joe Biden is a mercenary his respect is for sale to whoever is filling his off-shore banks accounts at any time.

Nicki Haley, same thing.
Why repeat a lie? You have no proof just assertion

If that were true why didnt the FBI relase Hunter Biden's laptop to congress?
Still a lie. You have no evidence of what's on that laptop. Besides one of your own found it. Why didn't he make a copy?


Didn't crackhead Hunter's former business partner flip on him and did an interview stating it all the allegations were true?
Not the allegation that President Biden interfered.


A some point we just have to face the fact that it is a near certainty that our president is a crook, whether someone can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law or not. Whether it is the people's choice for that crook to be in office or for someone else to be there, perhaps another crook, is what the election will decide.
Biden is not a crook. "Nearly certain " is assertion without proof. Where is your evidence?


I'm not interested in discussing the particulars of the smoke around Joe Biden and his family business. You should because you made the claim, not me.
You can google it and explore it for yourself if you are interested, but I doubt if you have any real interest in it. If you do, research it and make the best case you can to show he's a crook. As Harry Truman said, "Show me a man that gets rich by being a politician, and I'll show you a crook."
Biden show us his tax returns and Trump does not.




I've seen enough to be satisfied that the likelihood of Joe Biden being a crook is extremely high. It doesn't make me happy to reach that conclusion and I am not particularly interested in discussing it.


In a perfect situation, who would be your choice to serve as our next president ?


No justification or discussion necessary.




Unfortunately, no one comes to mind.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

Every election since post- President Washington the electorate has always shouted "There are no good candidates. I'll vote the lesser of two evils."
I'll vote for the candidate who tends to respect the humanity of its citizens in word and policy. Biden's my guy
bc he's a good guy and respects all the citizens he serves


Yes he respects the citizens he serves.... the ones from foreign countries laundering the most money through his crackhead son. Joe Biden is a mercenary his respect is for sale to whoever is filling his off-shore banks accounts at any time.

Nicki Haley, same thing.
Why repeat a lie? You have no proof just assertion

If that were true why didnt the FBI relase Hunter Biden's laptop to congress?
Still a lie. You have no evidence of what's on that laptop. Besides one of your own found it. Why didn't he make a copy?


Didn't crackhead Hunter's former business partner flip on him and did an interview stating it all the allegations were true?
Not the allegation that President Biden interfered.


A some point we just have to face the fact that it is a near certainty that our president is a crook, whether someone can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law or not. Whether it is the people's choice for that crook to be in office or for someone else to be there, perhaps another crook, is what the election will decide.
Biden is not a crook. "Nearly certain " is assertion without proof. Where is your evidence?


I'm not interested in discussing the particulars of the smoke around Joe Biden and his family business. You should because you made the claim, not me.
You can google it and explore it for yourself if you are interested, but I doubt if you have any real interest in it. If you do, research it and make the best case you can to show he's a crook. As Harry Truman said, "Show me a man that gets rich by being a politician, and I'll show you a crook."
Biden show us his tax returns and Trump does not.




I've seen enough to be satisfied that the likelihood of Joe Biden being a crook is extremely high. It doesn't make me happy to reach that conclusion and I am not particularly interested in discussing it. Nor am I am morally obligated to discuss it, despite your opinion to the contrary.

There is a lot of information is available for you if you wish to examine it. If you are so inclined, go read up on it yourself.

What Trump is or is not or did or did not do is entirely unrelated to the question of whether Biden is a crook. It is unclear why you mention him in your response.
binary whataboutism is strong with this one..
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

Every election since post- President Washington the electorate has always shouted "There are no good candidates. I'll vote the lesser of two evils."
I'll vote for the candidate who tends to respect the humanity of its citizens in word and policy. Biden's my guy
bc he's a good guy and respects all the citizens he serves


Yes he respects the citizens he serves.... the ones from foreign countries laundering the most money through his crackhead son. Joe Biden is a mercenary his respect is for sale to whoever is filling his off-shore banks accounts at any time.

Nicki Haley, same thing.
Why repeat a lie? You have no proof just assertion

If that were true why didnt the FBI relase Hunter Biden's laptop to congress?
Still a lie. You have no evidence of what's on that laptop. Besides one of your own found it. Why didn't he make a copy?


Didn't crackhead Hunter's former business partner flip on him and did an interview stating it all the allegations were true?
Not the allegation that President Biden interfered.


A some point we just have to face the fact that it is a near certainty that our president is a crook, whether someone can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law or not. Whether it is the people's choice for that crook to be in office or for someone else to be there, perhaps another crook, is what the election will decide.
Biden is not a crook. "Nearly certain " is assertion without proof. Where is your evidence?


I'm not interested in discussing the particulars of the smoke around Joe Biden and his family business. You should because you made the claim, not me.
You can google it and explore it for yourself if you are interested, but I doubt if you have any real interest in it. If you do, research it and make the best case you can to show he's a crook. As Harry Truman said, "Show me a man that gets rich by being a politician, and I'll show you a crook."
Biden show us his tax returns and Trump does not.




I've seen enough to be satisfied that the likelihood of Joe Biden being a crook is extremely high. It doesn't make me happy to reach that conclusion and I am not particularly interested in discussing it. Nor am I am morally obligated to discuss it, despite your opinion to the contrary.

There is a lot of information is available for you if you wish to examine it. If you are so inclined, go read up on it yourself.

What Trump is or is not or did or did not do is entirely unrelated to the question of whether Biden is a crook. It is unclear why you mention him in your response. Because the best source are Biden's tax returns. It points the hypocrisy of your standards for judging Presidents.


Because nooobody lies on a tax return..


The IRS determined that millions of tax returns contained neglegent errors and over a million were fraudulent.

There is also no legal requirement to disclose tax returns but there should be..

All elected officials in washington should have to disclose when elected and yearly as long as in office

Too many getting rich in congress on a congressmans pay
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

Every election since post- President Washington the electorate has always shouted "There are no good candidates. I'll vote the lesser of two evils."
I'll vote for the candidate who tends to respect the humanity of its citizens in word and policy. Biden's my guy
bc he's a good guy and respects all the citizens he serves


Yes he respects the citizens he serves.... the ones from foreign countries laundering the most money through his crackhead son. Joe Biden is a mercenary his respect is for sale to whoever is filling his off-shore banks accounts at any time.

Nicki Haley, same thing.
Why repeat a lie? You have no proof just assertion

If that were true why didnt the FBI relase Hunter Biden's laptop to congress?
Still a lie. You have no evidence of what's on that laptop. Besides one of your own found it. Why didn't he make a copy?


Didn't crackhead Hunter's former business partner flip on him and did an interview stating it all the allegations were true?
Not the allegation that President Biden interfered.


A some point we just have to face the fact that it is a near certainty that our president is a crook, whether someone can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law or not. Whether it is the people's choice for that crook to be in office or for someone else to be there, perhaps another crook, is what the election will decide.
Biden is not a crook. "Nearly certain " is assertion without proof. Where is your evidence?


I'm not interested in discussing the particulars of the smoke around Joe Biden and his family business. You should because you made the claim, not me.
You can google it and explore it for yourself if you are interested, but I doubt if you have any real interest in it. If you do, research it and make the best case you can to show he's a crook. As Harry Truman said, "Show me a man that gets rich by being a politician, and I'll show you a crook."
Biden show us his tax returns and Trump does not.




I've seen enough to be satisfied that the likelihood of Joe Biden being a crook is extremely high. It doesn't make me happy to reach that conclusion and I am not particularly interested in discussing it.


In a perfect situation, who would be your choice to serve as our next president ?


No justification or discussion necessary.




Haley she is the only one talking realistically about solving the problems we have. Trump had his shot and didn't do it, we added 8 trillion in debt. Biden is just as bad.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Asked and answered
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
C'mon man where's your proof?
BUbearinARK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

C'mon man where's your proof?
I actually don't have any proof that he is as innocent as the fresh driven snow. It was just a phrase.
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Asked and answered


Asserted without evidence. For something to be hypocritical, a second example is required. You haven't given one.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So you have no data or proof
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

Johnny Bear said:

4th and Inches said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Every election since post- President Washington the electorate has always shouted "There are no good candidates. I'll vote the lesser of two evils."
I'll vote for the candidate who tends to respect the humanity of its citizens in word and policy. Biden's my guy
bc he's a good guy and respects all the citizens he serves

We talking about the same Joe Biden that believes roughly half the country are fascists?

https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-biden-donald-trump-presidential-pennsylvania-edd46881a1c0c71df97663ac37236f26

Yes, that certainly sounds like a great guy who respect all citizens.
"all citizens he serves." he doesnt serve the MAGA crowd or the fly overs. He has made that abundantly clear many times over the last 3 years. People should believe him.

He "serves" nothing more than his own and his family's wholly corrupt desires and ambitions, period. Anyone that can't see that is either hopelessly brainwashed and/or dumbed down, or they don't have a fully functioning brain.
and Trumps doesn't? please.


Hey Jr

Please answer my earlier question .


How would you defend yourself against a sexual assault charge that supposedly occurred over 25 years ago ?

By a woman you had never even meet ?

With the civil case in a locality where you and your family were deeply unpopular ?

Come on JR educate this mere mortal. How are you going to prove your innocence and save your millions ?
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

KaiBear said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

Every election since post- President Washington the electorate has always shouted "There are no good candidates. I'll vote the lesser of two evils."
I'll vote for the candidate who tends to respect the humanity of its citizens in word and policy. Biden's my guy
bc he's a good guy and respects all the citizens he serves


Yes he respects the citizens he serves.... the ones from foreign countries laundering the most money through his crackhead son. Joe Biden is a mercenary his respect is for sale to whoever is filling his off-shore banks accounts at any time.

Nicki Haley, same thing.
Why repeat a lie? You have no proof just assertion

If that were true why didnt the FBI relase Hunter Biden's laptop to congress?
Still a lie. You have no evidence of what's on that laptop. Besides one of your own found it. Why didn't he make a copy?


Didn't crackhead Hunter's former business partner flip on him and did an interview stating it all the allegations were true?
Not the allegation that President Biden interfered.


A some point we just have to face the fact that it is a near certainty that our president is a crook, whether someone can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law or not. Whether it is the people's choice for that crook to be in office or for someone else to be there, perhaps another crook, is what the election will decide.
Biden is not a crook. "Nearly certain " is assertion without proof. Where is your evidence?


I'm not interested in discussing the particulars of the smoke around Joe Biden and his family business. You should because you made the claim, not me.
You can google it and explore it for yourself if you are interested, but I doubt if you have any real interest in it. If you do, research it and make the best case you can to show he's a crook. As Harry Truman said, "Show me a man that gets rich by being a politician, and I'll show you a crook."
Biden show us his tax returns and Trump does not.




I've seen enough to be satisfied that the likelihood of Joe Biden being a crook is extremely high. It doesn't make me happy to reach that conclusion and I am not particularly interested in discussing it.


In a perfect situation, who would be your choice to serve as our next president ?


No justification or discussion necessary.




Unfortunately, no one comes to mind.


Fair enough .
Southtxbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

KaiBear said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Waco1947 said:

Every election since post- President Washington the electorate has always shouted "There are no good candidates. I'll vote the lesser of two evils."
I'll vote for the candidate who tends to respect the humanity of its citizens in word and policy. Biden's my guy
bc he's a good guy and respects all the citizens he serves


Yes he respects the citizens he serves.... the ones from foreign countries laundering the most money through his crackhead son. Joe Biden is a mercenary his respect is for sale to whoever is filling his off-shore banks accounts at any time.

Nicki Haley, same thing.
Why repeat a lie? You have no proof just assertion

If that were true why didnt the FBI relase Hunter Biden's laptop to congress?
Still a lie. You have no evidence of what's on that laptop. Besides one of your own found it. Why didn't he make a copy?


Didn't crackhead Hunter's former business partner flip on him and did an interview stating it all the allegations were true?
Not the allegation that President Biden interfered.


A some point we just have to face the fact that it is a near certainty that our president is a crook, whether someone can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law or not. Whether it is the people's choice for that crook to be in office or for someone else to be there, perhaps another crook, is what the election will decide.
Biden is not a crook. "Nearly certain " is assertion without proof. Where is your evidence?


I'm not interested in discussing the particulars of the smoke around Joe Biden and his family business. You should because you made the claim, not me.
You can google it and explore it for yourself if you are interested, but I doubt if you have any real interest in it. If you do, research it and make the best case you can to show he's a crook. As Harry Truman said, "Show me a man that gets rich by being a politician, and I'll show you a crook."
Biden show us his tax returns and Trump does not.




I've seen enough to be satisfied that the likelihood of Joe Biden being a crook is extremely high. It doesn't make me happy to reach that conclusion and I am not particularly interested in discussing it.


In a perfect situation, who would be your choice to serve as our next president ?


No justification or discussion necessary.




Haley she is the only one talking realistically about solving the problems we have. Trump had his shot and didn't do it, we added 8 trillion in debt. Biden is just as bad.
yep, each had a chance when they had the full house. Each party has its own special interest and no one will reduce the debt.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

J.R. said:

Johnny Bear said:

4th and Inches said:

Mothra said:

Waco1947 said:

Every election since post- President Washington the electorate has always shouted "There are no good candidates. I'll vote the lesser of two evils."
I'll vote for the candidate who tends to respect the humanity of its citizens in word and policy. Biden's my guy
bc he's a good guy and respects all the citizens he serves

We talking about the same Joe Biden that believes roughly half the country are fascists?

https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-biden-donald-trump-presidential-pennsylvania-edd46881a1c0c71df97663ac37236f26

Yes, that certainly sounds like a great guy who respect all citizens.
"all citizens he serves." he doesnt serve the MAGA crowd or the fly overs. He has made that abundantly clear many times over the last 3 years. People should believe him.

He "serves" nothing more than his own and his family's wholly corrupt desires and ambitions, period. Anyone that can't see that is either hopelessly brainwashed and/or dumbed down, or they don't have a fully functioning brain.
and Trumps doesn't? please.


Hey Jr

Please answer my earlier question .


How would you defend yourself against a sexual assault charge that supposedly occurred over 25 years ago ?

By a woman you had never even meet ?

With the civil case in a locality where you and your family were deeply unpopular ?

Come on JR educate this mere mortal. How are you going to prove your innocence and save your millions ?
Well, fella, I'm not going to put myself in a situation where something could be mis construed! Fairly simple. I don't guess you have seen the photo with fat man with her? have ya. Mistook her for Marla Maples. (LOL)
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.