Trump's first 100 days

68,699 Views | 1944 Replies | Last: 15 min ago by boognish_bear
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

nein51 said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

nein51 said:

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

nein51 said:

KaiBear said:

ATL Bear said:

KaiBear said:

Good.

US automotive workers need all of the help they can get.
This won't help US autoworkers, but it will continue to spike US auto costs impacting everything from direct consumers to fleets.
If foreign cars cost more...domestic car sales should increase.

Except the current domestic lineup is absolute trash.

Cars aren't widgets where the only difference is where it was made and the quality of the materials it was made with.

Mercedes builds in Alabama, Ford in Mexico.

Complex issues often require complex solutions and, at the moment, we are caught up in trying to solve complex problems with simple solutions which works just this side of never.
Except it's not complicated. Cars produced here will be cheaper relative to imports. More Americans will purchase the cars made here. And those consumers that feel that they won't buy a domestic produced car will help increase our tariff tax revenue. Again, it's not complicated.

Or…hear me out…they just don't buy at all

Also, go ahead and define made here for me please
Sure, and hear me out ... a healthy blue collar work force and their communities will have more well paying jobs and will buy more cars.

Or…people don't buy either car, so those domestics are forced to scale back (did you not see the part where I'm right around the corner from Lordstown? I'm also awfully close to Ford's Cleveland facility and Walton Hills stamping plant…all 3 of which are closed).

This utopia where people buy a small Ford instead of a KIA is myth, for one Ford doesn't even make a small sedan any longer and if they did it wouldn't be made here but in Mexico.

Look the best possible thing for me a massive tariff on Chinese tools. It would be HUGE for my business.

But this concept that people will just buy A instead of B doesn't much work with cars that are sourced and produced globally, even the domestics.

So, again, define Domestic manufacturing for an automobile for me? I've already told you Ford doesn't work because a good chunk of their production is in Mexico. Are we adding a tariff to Mexican Ford production but not US Ford Production?
People will buy cheaper cars when similar cars are priced higher. Just economics. Sure some may not buy. But you're making a silly stand where one doesn't need to be made. We can't predict each individual but we can predict the group.

Also, I don't know what will constitute domestically made, but I'm sure it will be based on where it's assembled and what percent is made in the USA. Sort of irrelevant to the discussion at this point because we don't know. But if you know, please provide us with the info, and we can discuss it.

Summarizing what we all know to be true - tariffs will price foreign made cars out of range for many people. We also know that a healthy blue-collar workforce and their communities will buy cars. So let's wait and see what the details are before panicking. And no one will force you to buy American. You can save an extra month or two and buy the foreign made car.
We don't even have the capacity to fill the need gap even if your misguided understanding of economics came to pass. It takes years, not months for production facilities to come on line. So what happens is it actually creates supply shortages and drives up prices for all vehicles. This happened in the 80's when we tried to attack the Japanese to protect Chrysler with tariffs and import limitations. Price of cars didn't come down, nor were American jobs created, but Chrysler bolstered its profits during the period it had a market advantage.

These are corporations created to make money. They aren't here to provide a social service for communities or the government.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

I do argue for qualifications.

TuTu design and sensitivity to cross-dressing don't count, sorry not sorry.
I didn't notice that any fired Generals were cross-dressers or wore Tutus. Maybe fear of the Tutu is a reason to bypass the merit-qualified candidates.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

Jacques Strap said:



related


The only individuals against the use of voter ID and paper ballots are those who favor election fraud.

Period
That is just not correct. The vast majority would have absolutely no interest in voter fraud, but for most, it is virtue signaling, and for a minority it is actual, real fear that minorities would be disproportionately impacted by voter ID laws. I can pull this statistic outta my butt, and know 100% it's right: less than 5% of the country really wants fraud in the election.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacques Strap said:




lol I appreciate this. Guy is certainly dead by now, WRIPPPPP!
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

Oldbear83 said:

I do argue for qualifications.

TuTu design and sensitivity to cross-dressing don't count, sorry not sorry.
I didn't notice that any fired Generals were cross-dressers or wore Tutus. Maybe fear of the Tutu is a reason to bypass the merit-qualified candidates.
Old man optimizes homophobia at the highest leve. You know what they say about folks like that ? Sad, he can't get out of his own way always looking around the corner for the boogie man.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

KaiBear said:

Jacques Strap said:



related


The only individuals against the use of voter ID and paper ballots are those who favor election fraud.

Period
That is just not correct. The vast majority would have absolutely no interest in voter fraud, but for most, it is virtue signaling, and for a minority it is actual, real fear that minorities would be disproportionately impacted by voter ID laws. I can pull this statistic outta my butt, and know 100% it's right: less than 5% of the country really wants fraud in the election.


A. Minorities already hsve ID personally available for a myriad of other requirements. So the claim they can't produce it ID to vote is ridiculous.
B. Exactly how many people are going to answer a poll that they are in FAVOR of voter fraud ? LOL suspect you could pull a Chevy out of your big butt.
C. There are no viable reasons NOT to have paper ballots and voter ID. Just as there are no viable reasons for voter tabulations to last several days or even weeks.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

Porteroso said:

KaiBear said:

Jacques Strap said:



related


The only individuals against the use of voter ID and paper ballots are those who favor election fraud.

Period
That is just not correct. The vast majority would have absolutely no interest in voter fraud, but for most, it is virtue signaling, and for a minority it is actual, real fear that minorities would be disproportionately impacted by voter ID laws. I can pull this statistic outta my butt, and know 100% it's right: less than 5% of the country really wants fraud in the election.


A. Minorities already hsve ID personally available for a myriad of other requirements. So the claim they can't produce it ID to vote is ridiculous.
B. Exactly how many people are going to answer a poll that they are in FAVOR of voter fraud ? LOL suspect you could pull a Chevy out of your big butt.
C. There are no viable reasons NOT to have paper ballots and voter ID. Just as there are no viable reasons for voter tabulations to last several days or even weeks.
omg zealot I agree with voter ID, get off the high horse, it's already dead!
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

KaiBear said:

Porteroso said:

KaiBear said:

Jacques Strap said:



related


The only individuals against the use of voter ID and paper ballots are those who favor election fraud.

Period
That is just not correct. The vast majority would have absolutely no interest in voter fraud, but for most, it is virtue signaling, and for a minority it is actual, real fear that minorities would be disproportionately impacted by voter ID laws. I can pull this statistic outta my butt, and know 100% it's right: less than 5% of the country really wants fraud in the election.


A. Minorities already hsve ID personally available for a myriad of other requirements. So the claim they can't produce it ID to vote is ridiculous.
B. Exactly how many people are going to answer a poll that they are in FAVOR of voter fraud ? LOL suspect you could pull a Chevy out of your big butt.
C. There are no viable reasons NOT to have paper ballots and voter ID. Just as there are no viable reasons for voter tabulations to last several days or even weeks.
omg zealot I agree with voter ID, get off the high horse, it's already dead!


You are so naive; so hopelessly clueless, its disgusting to read.

Married A Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

KaiBear said:

Jacques Strap said:



related


The only individuals against the use of voter ID and paper ballots are those who favor election fraud.

Period
That is just not correct. The vast majority would have absolutely no interest in voter fraud, but for most, it is virtue signaling, and for a minority it is actual, real fear that minorities would be disproportionately impacted by voter ID laws. I can pull this statistic outta my butt, and know 100% it's right: less than 5% of the country really wants fraud in the election.


Wrong. Voter ID suppressing minorities is a racist comment. Minorities have IDs to do the rest of their life - why cant they figure out how to do it to vote?

Oh wait, you mean illegals? Yeah, it will suppress the illegal vote - so that minority, yeah, you are correct.

Is your boyfriend illegal?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Blood Green said:

canoso said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Jacques Strap said:




Also Joint Chiefs CQ Brown



and General James Slife






The President of the United States is not the Commander in Chief for nothing.


Only in Trump world do we scream hiring and firing should only be based on merit.

And we have a job that requires a 4 star general. So, we have an unqualified defense secretary fire the 4 star and replace him with a 3 star (retired).
General Officer promotions are highly political. In addition, at that level sometimes the star comes with the job. This guy being a 3-star, is not a big deal.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacques Strap said:

canoso said:

Assassin said:


What high-speed rail system?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_High-Speed_Rail


Quote:

California High-Speed Rail (CAHSR) is a publicly funded high-speed rail system being developed in California by the California High-Speed Rail Authority. Phase 1, about 494 miles (795 km) long, is planned to run from San Francisco to Los Angeles and Anaheim via the Central Valley, and is partially funded and under construction. A proposed Phase 2 would extend the system north to Sacramento and south to San Diego, for a total of 776 miles (1,249 km). The project was authorized by a 2008 statewide ballot to connect the state's major urban areas and reduce intercity travel times. Phase 1 targets a nonstop travel time of 2 hours and 40 minutes from San Francisco to Los Angeles, compared to about nine hours[6] on the existing Amtrak San Joaquins. California legislative overseers do not expect the 2 hr 40 min target will be achieved.




Also known as the Train to Nowhere
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

canoso said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Jacques Strap said:




Also Joint Chiefs CQ Brown



and General James Slife






The President of the United States is not the Commander in Chief for nothing.


Only in Trump world do we scream hiring and firing should only be based on merit.

And we have a job that requires a 4 star general. So, we have an unqualified defense secretary fire the 4 star and replace him with a 3 star (retired).
General Officer promotions are highly political. In addition, at that level sometimes the star comes with the job. This guy being a 3-star, is not a big deal.

They are 100% political. Frankly, once you get to your full birds it's political. Birds and above are essentially corporate executives who are towards the end of long careers. Most of those guys are incredibly good ass kissers because they have to be. They leverage relationships to get promoted just like the corporate world.

There are exceptions for sure but you really don't reach that level and above without being really, really good at politics.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacques Strap said:

No one voted for this
This is illegal
Constitutional Crisis
Musk is the President
Trump thinks he is a King
The classic early signs of backlash are beginning to surface



Brian Stelter is wetting his pants while Republicans are celebrating. Trump is delivering on his promises.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

canoso said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Jacques Strap said:




Also Joint Chiefs CQ Brown



and General James Slife






The President of the United States is not the Commander in Chief for nothing.


Only in Trump world do we scream hiring and firing should only be based on merit.

And we have a job that requires a 4 star general. So, we have an unqualified defense secretary fire the 4 star and replace him with a 3 star (retired).
stars dont matter.. results on the field matter.

That 4 star has zero national championships!

But they do have plenty of DEI & trans medals!
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

FLBear5630 said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

canoso said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

Jacques Strap said:




Also Joint Chiefs CQ Brown



and General James Slife






The President of the United States is not the Commander in Chief for nothing.


Only in Trump world do we scream hiring and firing should only be based on merit.

And we have a job that requires a 4 star general. So, we have an unqualified defense secretary fire the 4 star and replace him with a 3 star (retired).
General Officer promotions are highly political. In addition, at that level sometimes the star comes with the job. This guy being a 3-star, is not a big deal.

They are 100% political. Frankly, once you get to your full birds it's political. Birds and above are essentially corporate executives who are towards the end of long careers. Most of those guys are incredibly good ass kissers because they have to be. They leverage relationships to get promoted just like the corporate world.

There are exceptions for sure but you really don't reach that level and above without being really, really good at politics.
Agree...
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:


Racist? Naw. More like smart.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Jacques Strap said:

canoso said:

Assassin said:


What high-speed rail system?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_High-Speed_Rail


Quote:

California High-Speed Rail (CAHSR) is a publicly funded high-speed rail system being developed in California by the California High-Speed Rail Authority. Phase 1, about 494 miles (795 km) long, is planned to run from San Francisco to Los Angeles and Anaheim via the Central Valley, and is partially funded and under construction. A proposed Phase 2 would extend the system north to Sacramento and south to San Diego, for a total of 776 miles (1,249 km). The project was authorized by a 2008 statewide ballot to connect the state's major urban areas and reduce intercity travel times. Phase 1 targets a nonstop travel time of 2 hours and 40 minutes from San Francisco to Los Angeles, compared to about nine hours[6] on the existing Amtrak San Joaquins. California legislative overseers do not expect the 2 hr 40 min target will be achieved.




Also known as the Train to Nowhere
Actually, they had two routes that made a lot of sense and I think could have been profitable.

1 - LA to Vegas - To me this is the premier route for High Speed Rail why they couldn't mek this work is a mystery to me.

2 - Pacific Coast SD to LA to SF to Portland to Seattle - this is one of AMTRAK's most profitable routes. It is a hell of a pull, but it is and would be a great corridor for rail.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:



The Mexican govt should provide the criminals returning there room & board in a maximum security prison but make them work for it.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

historian said:

Jacques Strap said:

canoso said:

Assassin said:


What high-speed rail system?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_High-Speed_Rail


Quote:

California High-Speed Rail (CAHSR) is a publicly funded high-speed rail system being developed in California by the California High-Speed Rail Authority. Phase 1, about 494 miles (795 km) long, is planned to run from San Francisco to Los Angeles and Anaheim via the Central Valley, and is partially funded and under construction. A proposed Phase 2 would extend the system north to Sacramento and south to San Diego, for a total of 776 miles (1,249 km). The project was authorized by a 2008 statewide ballot to connect the state's major urban areas and reduce intercity travel times. Phase 1 targets a nonstop travel time of 2 hours and 40 minutes from San Francisco to Los Angeles, compared to about nine hours[6] on the existing Amtrak San Joaquins. California legislative overseers do not expect the 2 hr 40 min target will be achieved.




Also known as the Train to Nowhere
Actually, they had two routes that made a lot of sense and I think could have been profitable.

1 - LA to Vegas - To me this is the premier route for High Speed Rail why they couldn't mek this work is a mystery to me.

2 - Pacific Coast SD to LA to SF to Portland to Seattle - this is one of AMTRAK's most profitable routes. It is a hell of a pull, but it is and would be a great corridor for rail.

They couldn't make it work because the govt was behind it. Everything the govt touches they mess up. Expensive projects like this amplify the problems because there are more kickbacks & other forms of corruption.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

FLBear5630 said:

historian said:

Jacques Strap said:

canoso said:

Assassin said:


What high-speed rail system?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_High-Speed_Rail


Quote:

California High-Speed Rail (CAHSR) is a publicly funded high-speed rail system being developed in California by the California High-Speed Rail Authority. Phase 1, about 494 miles (795 km) long, is planned to run from San Francisco to Los Angeles and Anaheim via the Central Valley, and is partially funded and under construction. A proposed Phase 2 would extend the system north to Sacramento and south to San Diego, for a total of 776 miles (1,249 km). The project was authorized by a 2008 statewide ballot to connect the state's major urban areas and reduce intercity travel times. Phase 1 targets a nonstop travel time of 2 hours and 40 minutes from San Francisco to Los Angeles, compared to about nine hours[6] on the existing Amtrak San Joaquins. California legislative overseers do not expect the 2 hr 40 min target will be achieved.




Also known as the Train to Nowhere
Actually, they had two routes that made a lot of sense and I think could have been profitable.

1 - LA to Vegas - To me this is the premier route for High Speed Rail why they couldn't mek this work is a mystery to me.

2 - Pacific Coast SD to LA to SF to Portland to Seattle - this is one of AMTRAK's most profitable routes. It is a hell of a pull, but it is and would be a great corridor for rail.

They couldn't make it work because the govt was behind it. Everything the govt touches they mess up. Expensive projects like this amplify the problems because there are more kickbacks & other forms of corruption.
No, that Govt. Not all Governments are incompetent. Also, the US Govt was not always this incompetent. This is a people problem, not an institutional problem. Put the right people, use the Government assets and reward production, not effort. Th

In Japan, they have built many routes with no issues. It all comes down to people, institutions are tools. No different than a hammer. If that hammer cost $750, it is because the people are gauging.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Over the past 100 years, the US govt has far more history of incompetence & corruption than they do of getting things right. Civil rights, landing on the moon, winning WWII & the Cold War pale in comparison to $36 trillion in debt, abortion on demand, the climate cult, the trans cult, and all the waste, fraud & abuse that DOGE is uncovering. And Musk is just getting started.

We all would be better off of most of the government agencies were cut in half (size & budget) and a huge number of them eliminated altogether. They tend to do more harm than good. That is their nature. By definition, government is parasitical. Why would anyone want more leeches sucking away their lifeblood?
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?

“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

historian said:

FLBear5630 said:

historian said:

Jacques Strap said:

canoso said:

Assassin said:


What high-speed rail system?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_High-Speed_Rail


Quote:

California High-Speed Rail (CAHSR) is a publicly funded high-speed rail system being developed in California by the California High-Speed Rail Authority. Phase 1, about 494 miles (795 km) long, is planned to run from San Francisco to Los Angeles and Anaheim via the Central Valley, and is partially funded and under construction. A proposed Phase 2 would extend the system north to Sacramento and south to San Diego, for a total of 776 miles (1,249 km). The project was authorized by a 2008 statewide ballot to connect the state's major urban areas and reduce intercity travel times. Phase 1 targets a nonstop travel time of 2 hours and 40 minutes from San Francisco to Los Angeles, compared to about nine hours[6] on the existing Amtrak San Joaquins. California legislative overseers do not expect the 2 hr 40 min target will be achieved.




Also known as the Train to Nowhere
Actually, they had two routes that made a lot of sense and I think could have been profitable.

1 - LA to Vegas - To me this is the premier route for High Speed Rail why they couldn't mek this work is a mystery to me.

2 - Pacific Coast SD to LA to SF to Portland to Seattle - this is one of AMTRAK's most profitable routes. It is a hell of a pull, but it is and would be a great corridor for rail.

They couldn't make it work because the govt was behind it. Everything the govt touches they mess up. Expensive projects like this amplify the problems because there are more kickbacks & other forms of corruption.
No, that Govt. Not all Governments are incompetent. Also, the US Govt was not always this incompetent. This is a people problem, not an institutional problem. Put the right people, use the Government assets and reward production, not effort. Th

In Japan, they have built many routes with no issues. It all comes down to people, institutions are tools. No different than a hammer. If that hammer cost $750, it is because the people are gauging.

The entirety of Japan is 20,000 square miles smaller than the state of California. So California if you removed a chunk of land the size of West Virginia. Japan would be the 5th largest U.S. State.

So if NYC, LA, Chicago, Houston, Phoenix, Philly, San Antonio, San Diego, Dallas, Austin, Jacksonville, San Jose, Ft Worth, Columbus, Charlotte, Indianapolis, san Francisco, Seattle, Denver, OKC, Nashville, El Paso, DC, LV and Boston were ALL IN California (minus West Virginia) that would basically mirror Japan's top 25 cities by population.

When people in the U.S. realize that we are just not like the rest of the globe we will be way better off. Each state is like its own country if you make a global comparison.

What you need here vs what you need in Japan are so shockingly different it isn't funny.

And $750 hammers are a byproduct of needing a very specialized tool made out of very specialized materials for a very specific purpose…not a byproduct of spending $750 on a Husky hammer that retails for $8
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?

“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Your idea of "merit" is not what historically would be called merit.

Better up your meds, this is just the start.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?

“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Over the past 100 years, the US govt has far more history of incompetence & corruption than they do of getting things right. Civil rights, landing on the moon, winning WWII & the Cold War pale in comparison to $36 trillion in debt, abortion on demand, the climate cult, the trans cult, and all the waste, fraud & abuse that DOGE is uncovering. And Musk is just getting started.

We all would be better off of most of the government agencies were cut in half (size & budget) and a huge number of them eliminated altogether. They tend to do more harm than good. That is their nature. By definition, government is parasitical. Why would anyone want more leeches sucking away their lifeblood?
Civil rights, landing on the moon, winning WWII & the Cold War pale in comparison

To who? You? You have a VERY skewed view of this subject, which I find funny that you are a teacher, correct? Last I heard, I don't know of any educational institution that does not rely on the public paying for it. You working at a teaching institution that does not take any Govt dollars?

You are attributing the last 10 years of Government bloat to all Government institutions, a bloat which Trump played his part in creating. Nobody here is arguing that the post-COVID world is not a trainwreck. A lot of this debt is from Government giveaways, which I received NO dollars (I make too much). Did you receive a COVID payment?

This is a people problem, not an institutional. Institutions are only as good as the people running it. Homan a competent guy? How much of his life was spend working and getting paid by Government? The Government is full of Homans. But keep going with your blanket statements under the guise that you are some type of "professional" historian.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's not just the last 10 years. It's been going on for decades. What we've seen already is huge and they are just starting to scratch the surface. Expect far more revelations over the coming weeks.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?

“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?

“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.