You can watch the launch live on YouTube:
https://tcupress.tcu.edu/9780875659862/
Great work by the @SpaceX team https://t.co/75Wei3wMrS
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 14, 2025
F-35 Overwatch During SpaceX Launch at Kennedy Space Center. An alternate view❤️🔥🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/Hlawt02Zqg
— Noddy (@Noddy_Nub) October 14, 2025
If Elon Musk never bought Twitter, the world wouldn't be the same. That moment changed everything
— DogeDesigner (@cb_doge) October 14, 2025
He went through pain most can’t imagine, put his life at risk, not for power or money but to protect free speech. There aren’t many in history who’ve had the guts to do what he did.
🚨ABSOLUTE INSANITY - UK GOVERNMENT PLAN TO TAKE DOWN ELON MUSK
— Basil the Great (@Basil_TGMD) October 15, 2025
Call him a security threat and a funder of the Far Right.
They also attack Tommy Robinson
Communists have taken over our country
They’re out of control
pic.twitter.com/nOBkvC6Q0T
This needs to stop.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 18, 2025
A justice system with vastly more empathy for violent criminals than their innocent victims is no justice system at all!
And shame on those funding this madness! https://t.co/lkP08W5kDc
Starship is a planet-colonizer class rocket.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 19, 2025
The magnitude of that task makes every other space transport task trivial. https://t.co/azwVoi5BK9
This is the path to a Kardashev Type II civilization that harnesses most of the power of our Sun, which is more than a billion times more energy than everything else on Earth combined https://t.co/WsPTGCl6xG
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 19, 2025
In 2008, 60 minutes did a hit piece on Elon and the Tesla Roadster, even adding car noises to the silent sports car. Since then, I realized this program cannot be trusted in any topics.
— Maye Musk (@mayemusk) October 19, 2025
I’m hoping Australians are smarter and don’t believe the reporter who obviously had an… https://t.co/RcuvnEas0O
Much, much harder to be a quarterback than an armchair quarterback https://t.co/RtFOvJicCV
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 20, 2025
Assassin said:Much, much harder to be a quarterback than an armchair quarterback https://t.co/RtFOvJicCV
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 20, 2025
FLBear5630 said:Assassin said:Much, much harder to be a quarterback than an armchair quarterback https://t.co/RtFOvJicCV
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 20, 2025
This goes back to the valuation discussion. No data supporting an overnight jump, but now Starbucks is a success again, with no changes in actual product or service. Give him a 20M bonus.
You wonder why we are in trouble? We are living and dying based on Wall St jumps. Market has to move for those people to make money, so they will make moves - up and down. This is a good example.
Assassin said:FLBear5630 said:Assassin said:Much, much harder to be a quarterback than an armchair quarterback https://t.co/RtFOvJicCV
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 20, 2025
This goes back to the valuation discussion. No data supporting an overnight jump, but now Starbucks is a success again, with no changes in actual product or service. Give him a 20M bonus.
You wonder why we are in trouble? We are living and dying based on Wall St jumps. Market has to move for those people to make money, so they will make moves - up and down. This is a good example.
In my stock trading experience, I rely on the, smarter than I, guys. Never cared to own Starbucks as it sends to many funds to the left. They know what I like.
Blue Origin could likely land on the Moon before SpaceX but this is Blue Moon Mk1, a small lander testbed for Blue Moon Mk2 that would provide no value if man rated.
— Truthful🛰️ (@Truthful_ast) October 20, 2025
So why bother man rating it to beat China? China doesn’t plan on flags and footprints, they plan on permanent… pic.twitter.com/gKXpu2R6FL
Elon Musk's new $20 billion project New York to London in minutes pic.twitter.com/yrYZCPnCty
— Interesting As Fuck (@interesting_aIl) October 21, 2025
As much as I love Blue Origin, SpaceX has launched Starship 5 times since New Glenn’s maiden flight 9 months ago all while facing multiple failures and is already moving onto a next generation Starship for refueling, payload deploy in orbit, lunar landing tests, and more.
— Truthful🛰️ (@Truthful_ast) October 20, 2025
But we…
Assassin said:As much as I love Blue Origin, SpaceX has launched Starship 5 times since New Glenn’s maiden flight 9 months ago all while facing multiple failures and is already moving onto a next generation Starship for refueling, payload deploy in orbit, lunar landing tests, and more.
— Truthful🛰️ (@Truthful_ast) October 20, 2025
But we…
FLBear5630 said:Assassin said:As much as I love Blue Origin, SpaceX has launched Starship 5 times since New Glenn’s maiden flight 9 months ago all while facing multiple failures and is already moving onto a next generation Starship for refueling, payload deploy in orbit, lunar landing tests, and more.
— Truthful🛰️ (@Truthful_ast) October 20, 2025
But we…
So, if Elon gets to Mars first does he get to own Mars? Will future ships need permits from him to land?
Assassin said:FLBear5630 said:Assassin said:As much as I love Blue Origin, SpaceX has launched Starship 5 times since New Glenn’s maiden flight 9 months ago all while facing multiple failures and is already moving onto a next generation Starship for refueling, payload deploy in orbit, lunar landing tests, and more.
— Truthful🛰️ (@Truthful_ast) October 20, 2025
But we…
So, if Elon gets to Mars first does he get to own Mars? Will future ships need permits from him to land?
As humanity inches closer to setting foot on Mars, one big question keeps surfacing: Can anyone actually own land on the Red Planet? With billionaires building rockets and space agencies planning missions, the idea of staking a Martian land claim seems less like science fiction and more like a real possibility. But before you start shopping for a Martian vacation home, here's what the law actually says.
Mars Belongs to Everyone and No One
Back in 1967, long before Elon Musk or SpaceX were household names, the world's major powers signed a landmark agreement known as the Outer Space Treaty. This international accord, still in force today, lays out the rules for how space canand can'tbe used.
One of its core principles? No nation can claim sovereignty over any part of outer space, including Mars. In the eyes of the law, Mars is the "province of all mankind." It's free for exploration and use by allbut off-limits when it comes to ownership.
In other words, countries can land on Mars, build research stations, and explore as much as they like, but they can't plant a flag and call it theirs. No "Mars: Property of the USA" signs allowed.
Control Without Ownership
That doesn't mean countries have no rights at all in space. The treaty does allow nations to maintain jurisdiction and control over their own spacecraft, astronauts, and any facilities they establish on celestial bodies. So, if NASA sets up a base on Mars, it's still subject to U.S. lawsjust like an American embassy or a scientific station in Antarctica.
But the key point is this: control is not the same as ownership. The land beneath that Mars base still isn't legally theirs.
What About Those Mars Land Deeds?
You've probably seen themcompanies online offering to sell you a plot of Martian land for a small fee, complete with an official-looking deed. Sounds like a great gift or novelty item, right?
Sure, but don't confuse it with legal ownership. These "sales" are purely symbolic and carry no legal weight whatsoever. No government on Earth recognizes private property rights on Marsor anywhere else in space, for that matter.
These novelty deeds are essentially fundraising gimmicks or fun souvenirs. Buying one doesn't give you any actual claim to Martian soil.
The Final Frontier of Property Rights
As missions to Mars become more realand private companies get involved in space travelinternational lawyers and policymakers are starting to wrestle with what the future might look like. Should we develop new space laws to allow property rights? How can we balance commercial interests with the idea of space as a shared domain?
For now, though, the rules are clear: Mars doesn't belong to anyone. And until the law changes, that dream of owning your own red-tinged ranch will have to stay firmly grounded on Earth.
FLBear5630 said:Assassin said:FLBear5630 said:Assassin said:As much as I love Blue Origin, SpaceX has launched Starship 5 times since New Glenn’s maiden flight 9 months ago all while facing multiple failures and is already moving onto a next generation Starship for refueling, payload deploy in orbit, lunar landing tests, and more.
— Truthful🛰️ (@Truthful_ast) October 20, 2025
But we…
So, if Elon gets to Mars first does he get to own Mars? Will future ships need permits from him to land?
As humanity inches closer to setting foot on Mars, one big question keeps surfacing: Can anyone actually own land on the Red Planet? With billionaires building rockets and space agencies planning missions, the idea of staking a Martian land claim seems less like science fiction and more like a real possibility. But before you start shopping for a Martian vacation home, here's what the law actually says.
Mars Belongs to Everyone and No One
Back in 1967, long before Elon Musk or SpaceX were household names, the world's major powers signed a landmark agreement known as the Outer Space Treaty. This international accord, still in force today, lays out the rules for how space canand can'tbe used.
One of its core principles? No nation can claim sovereignty over any part of outer space, including Mars. In the eyes of the law, Mars is the "province of all mankind." It's free for exploration and use by allbut off-limits when it comes to ownership.
In other words, countries can land on Mars, build research stations, and explore as much as they like, but they can't plant a flag and call it theirs. No "Mars: Property of the USA" signs allowed.
Control Without Ownership
That doesn't mean countries have no rights at all in space. The treaty does allow nations to maintain jurisdiction and control over their own spacecraft, astronauts, and any facilities they establish on celestial bodies. So, if NASA sets up a base on Mars, it's still subject to U.S. lawsjust like an American embassy or a scientific station in Antarctica.
But the key point is this: control is not the same as ownership. The land beneath that Mars base still isn't legally theirs.
What About Those Mars Land Deeds?
You've probably seen themcompanies online offering to sell you a plot of Martian land for a small fee, complete with an official-looking deed. Sounds like a great gift or novelty item, right?
Sure, but don't confuse it with legal ownership. These "sales" are purely symbolic and carry no legal weight whatsoever. No government on Earth recognizes private property rights on Marsor anywhere else in space, for that matter.
These novelty deeds are essentially fundraising gimmicks or fun souvenirs. Buying one doesn't give you any actual claim to Martian soil.
The Final Frontier of Property Rights
As missions to Mars become more realand private companies get involved in space travelinternational lawyers and policymakers are starting to wrestle with what the future might look like. Should we develop new space laws to allow property rights? How can we balance commercial interests with the idea of space as a shared domain?
For now, though, the rules are clear: Mars doesn't belong to anyone. And until the law changes, that dream of owning your own red-tinged ranch will have to stay firmly grounded on Earth.
Like the old West, won't mean anything until they are able to enforce it. Does China or the US believe they have to answer to International Law? Will be interesting.
EatMoreSalmon said:FLBear5630 said:Assassin said:FLBear5630 said:Assassin said:As much as I love Blue Origin, SpaceX has launched Starship 5 times since New Glenn’s maiden flight 9 months ago all while facing multiple failures and is already moving onto a next generation Starship for refueling, payload deploy in orbit, lunar landing tests, and more.
— Truthful🛰️ (@Truthful_ast) October 20, 2025
But we…
So, if Elon gets to Mars first does he get to own Mars? Will future ships need permits from him to land?
As humanity inches closer to setting foot on Mars, one big question keeps surfacing: Can anyone actually own land on the Red Planet? With billionaires building rockets and space agencies planning missions, the idea of staking a Martian land claim seems less like science fiction and more like a real possibility. But before you start shopping for a Martian vacation home, here's what the law actually says.
Mars Belongs to Everyone and No One
Back in 1967, long before Elon Musk or SpaceX were household names, the world's major powers signed a landmark agreement known as the Outer Space Treaty. This international accord, still in force today, lays out the rules for how space canand can'tbe used.
One of its core principles? No nation can claim sovereignty over any part of outer space, including Mars. In the eyes of the law, Mars is the "province of all mankind." It's free for exploration and use by allbut off-limits when it comes to ownership.
In other words, countries can land on Mars, build research stations, and explore as much as they like, but they can't plant a flag and call it theirs. No "Mars: Property of the USA" signs allowed.
Control Without Ownership
That doesn't mean countries have no rights at all in space. The treaty does allow nations to maintain jurisdiction and control over their own spacecraft, astronauts, and any facilities they establish on celestial bodies. So, if NASA sets up a base on Mars, it's still subject to U.S. lawsjust like an American embassy or a scientific station in Antarctica.
But the key point is this: control is not the same as ownership. The land beneath that Mars base still isn't legally theirs.
What About Those Mars Land Deeds?
You've probably seen themcompanies online offering to sell you a plot of Martian land for a small fee, complete with an official-looking deed. Sounds like a great gift or novelty item, right?
Sure, but don't confuse it with legal ownership. These "sales" are purely symbolic and carry no legal weight whatsoever. No government on Earth recognizes private property rights on Marsor anywhere else in space, for that matter.
These novelty deeds are essentially fundraising gimmicks or fun souvenirs. Buying one doesn't give you any actual claim to Martian soil.
The Final Frontier of Property Rights
As missions to Mars become more realand private companies get involved in space travelinternational lawyers and policymakers are starting to wrestle with what the future might look like. Should we develop new space laws to allow property rights? How can we balance commercial interests with the idea of space as a shared domain?
For now, though, the rules are clear: Mars doesn't belong to anyone. And until the law changes, that dream of owning your own red-tinged ranch will have to stay firmly grounded on Earth.
Like the old West, won't mean anything until they are able to enforce it. Does China or the US believe they have to answer to International Law? Will be interesting.
Reality will set in when mining and manufacturing start happening on the moon and mars. There will be a change when things go from research and exploration to colonization.
Empathy for the victims requires that repeat violent offenders be incarcerated https://t.co/YJB89FS27t
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 22, 2025
Assassin said:Empathy for the victims requires that repeat violent offenders be incarcerated https://t.co/YJB89FS27t
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 22, 2025
FLBear5630 said:Assassin said:Empathy for the victims requires that repeat violent offenders be incarcerated https://t.co/YJB89FS27t
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 22, 2025
Then the Prison budget has to go up. Or, we move toward executions.
Maybe we put them on cigarette boats off Venezuela and control the throttle. Efficiency, it is not only a deterrent and reduces prison cost, but it is a great Fox News piece.
Having a NASA Administrator who knows literally ZERO about rockets & spacecraft undermines the American space program and endangers our astronauts https://t.co/DQVhRgj3A4
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 22, 2025
Assassin said:FLBear5630 said:Assassin said:Empathy for the victims requires that repeat violent offenders be incarcerated https://t.co/YJB89FS27t
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 22, 2025
Then the Prison budget has to go up. Or, we move toward executions.
Maybe we put them on cigarette boats off Venezuela and control the throttle. Efficiency, it is not only a deterrent and reduces prison cost, but it is a great Fox News piece.
Not sure what Fox News has to do with getting rid of Fentanyl coming into the US, but as to your other assertion, I have no problem with executing folks that have been on Death Row for decades. That will clear some space. And many of them are ready to go.
The fundamental issue is that half of all publicly-traded shares are controlled by passive index funds who, for the most part, outsource their shareholder vote to the advisory firms of ISS and Glass Lewis.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 23, 2025
ISS and Glass Lewis have no actual ownership themselves and often vote… https://t.co/yiHUKNUL26
Tesla’s third quarter revenue:
— Jon Erlichman (@JonErlichman) October 22, 2025
2025: $28.1 billion
2024: $25.2 billion
2023: $23.4 billion
2022: $21.5 billion
2021: $13.8 billion
2020: $8.8 billion
2019: $6.3 billion
2018: $6.8 billion
2017: $2.9 billion
2016: $2.3 billion
2015: $937 million
2014: $852 million
If she’s a 10, you’re an asset 💯😂 pic.twitter.com/Fc9twx1BPp
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 23, 2025
Assassin said:If she’s a 10, you’re an asset 💯😂 pic.twitter.com/Fc9twx1BPp
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 23, 2025
Suicidal empathy is killing Western Civilization.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 26, 2025
It is good to have empathy, but we cannot allow our empathy to be abused to the point of extinction! https://t.co/JQ1fmXOdio
Elon Musk is just trying to do good things.
— Dr Ashley 🇺🇸 (@Aku_700) October 28, 2025
-DOGE is saving tax dollars.
-Neuralink is finding cures for paralysis & blindness.
-Tesla is accelerating world’s transition to sustainable energy.
-SpaceX is working on making humanity multiplanetary
-𝕏 is restoring free speech.…
Wired, The Atlantic, Guardian and many other propaganda legacy publications would die immediately if they had to support themselves. Donations from far left organizations disguised as charities are what keep them alive.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 28, 2025
They serve simply as a means of influencing Wikipedia,… https://t.co/6zzXpbxrtf