BREAKING: Trump says U.S. oil companies will pour BILLIONS into Venezuela.
— Marc Nixon (@MarcNixon24) January 3, 2026
Canadian INVESTMENTS about to FLOOD OUT
Mark Carney is watching our leverage evaporate.
It’s time for a SNAP ELECTION.
Canadians decide:
Net Zero ideology or economic survival pic.twitter.com/uEI3r9CbfN
boognish_bear said:Stephanopoulos: He said, you cannot credibly argue that drug trafficking charges demand invasion in one case while issuing a pardon in another. What's your response?
— Acyn (@Acyn) January 4, 2026
Rubio: In the case of Maduro, look, it's very simple. This guy was indicted.
Stephanopoulos: Hernandez was… pic.twitter.com/eI9QDLvbs7
Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:Stranger said:FLBear5630 said:
Ok, does process matter? Does the Constitution matter? I think based on the responses we have seen this year, it is something that deserves discussion.
Does following the Constitution and trying to follow the Constitution matter any more? OR, is finding creative ways around it through Executive Orders or waiting for the Courts the new way if the Executive Branch determines the ends justifies the means?
Honest questions. Because we are now at a point where we have creative Executive Orders and Sec of State's saying they do not have to tell Congress about using the military if the mission is deemed so. Nevermind, Trump's leaking comments...
They are picking areas that no one wants to fight, such as Maduro, drug dealers, etc. to set precedent. Now, Trump is saying we can do this more. Is Cuba, Panama Canal, Greenland on the table? As Trump said, Who is going to stop us?
Is that what we want.
obviously, a liberal
Yeah to this group, have to be to discuss process.
Funny, nowhere does this specific situation show up in the Constitution saying the United States has to do what FLBear wants.
Bottom line, you are spewing spite because 'Trump'.
Cry more.
The geopolitical advantage of Venezuela:
— The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) January 4, 2026
As we outline below, Venezuela holds BILLIONS of barrels of heavy crude oil.
Who else holds large amounts of heavy crude oil? Russia.
Who is the largest IMPORTER of Venezuelan crude oil? China.
In fact, ~5% of China's annual crude oil… https://t.co/JBbTPxeBi6 pic.twitter.com/d0FqoWPuJo
FLBear5630 said:Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:Stranger said:FLBear5630 said:
Ok, does process matter? Does the Constitution matter? I think based on the responses we have seen this year, it is something that deserves discussion.
Does following the Constitution and trying to follow the Constitution matter any more? OR, is finding creative ways around it through Executive Orders or waiting for the Courts the new way if the Executive Branch determines the ends justifies the means?
Honest questions. Because we are now at a point where we have creative Executive Orders and Sec of State's saying they do not have to tell Congress about using the military if the mission is deemed so. Nevermind, Trump's leaking comments...
They are picking areas that no one wants to fight, such as Maduro, drug dealers, etc. to set precedent. Now, Trump is saying we can do this more. Is Cuba, Panama Canal, Greenland on the table? As Trump said, Who is going to stop us?
Is that what we want.
obviously, a liberal
Yeah to this group, have to be to discuss process.
Funny, nowhere does this specific situation show up in the Constitution saying the United States has to do what FLBear wants.
Bottom line, you are spewing spite because 'Trump'.
Cry more.
Roll of Eyes.
You are good with this, no issue.
Do you feel the same with a Democrat President doing their thing with emergency declarations and EOs?
Some Democrats hate that their party is largely positioning itself in opposition to the operation that resulted in Maduro's capture.
— Andrew Solender (@AndrewSolender) January 4, 2026
"Everything Trump touches must be bad according to the base," one House Dem told @axios
Said another: "It looks weak." https://t.co/v0iKR7y6Wi
Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:Stranger said:FLBear5630 said:
Ok, does process matter? Does the Constitution matter? I think based on the responses we have seen this year, it is something that deserves discussion.
Does following the Constitution and trying to follow the Constitution matter any more? OR, is finding creative ways around it through Executive Orders or waiting for the Courts the new way if the Executive Branch determines the ends justifies the means?
Honest questions. Because we are now at a point where we have creative Executive Orders and Sec of State's saying they do not have to tell Congress about using the military if the mission is deemed so. Nevermind, Trump's leaking comments...
They are picking areas that no one wants to fight, such as Maduro, drug dealers, etc. to set precedent. Now, Trump is saying we can do this more. Is Cuba, Panama Canal, Greenland on the table? As Trump said, Who is going to stop us?
Is that what we want.
obviously, a liberal
Yeah to this group, have to be to discuss process.
Funny, nowhere does this specific situation show up in the Constitution saying the United States has to do what FLBear wants.
Bottom line, you are spewing spite because 'Trump'.
Cry more.
Roll of Eyes.
You are good with this, no issue.
Do you feel the same with a Democrat President doing their thing with emergency declarations and EOs?
Sure. See Obama taking out Osama bin Laden, for example.
You want Maduro treated with the same respect due a duly elected President, and you want the narco state aspect to be ignored.
This is why no serious adult is going to support your position.
You can't be serious. Some of you guys have morphed your positions so much from the beginning of this thread it's almost comical.Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:Stranger said:FLBear5630 said:
Ok, does process matter? Does the Constitution matter? I think based on the responses we have seen this year, it is something that deserves discussion.
Does following the Constitution and trying to follow the Constitution matter any more? OR, is finding creative ways around it through Executive Orders or waiting for the Courts the new way if the Executive Branch determines the ends justifies the means?
Honest questions. Because we are now at a point where we have creative Executive Orders and Sec of State's saying they do not have to tell Congress about using the military if the mission is deemed so. Nevermind, Trump's leaking comments...
They are picking areas that no one wants to fight, such as Maduro, drug dealers, etc. to set precedent. Now, Trump is saying we can do this more. Is Cuba, Panama Canal, Greenland on the table? As Trump said, Who is going to stop us?
Is that what we want.
obviously, a liberal
Yeah to this group, have to be to discuss process.
Funny, nowhere does this specific situation show up in the Constitution saying the United States has to do what FLBear wants.
Bottom line, you are spewing spite because 'Trump'.
Cry more.
Roll of Eyes.
You are good with this, no issue.
Do you feel the same with a Democrat President doing their thing with emergency declarations and EOs?
Sure. See Obama taking out Osama bin Laden, for example.
You want Maduro treated with the same respect due a duly elected President, and you want the narco state aspect to be ignored.
This is why no serious adult is going to support your position.
ATL Bear said:Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:Stranger said:FLBear5630 said:
Ok, does process matter? Does the Constitution matter? I think based on the responses we have seen this year, it is something that deserves discussion.
Does following the Constitution and trying to follow the Constitution matter any more? OR, is finding creative ways around it through Executive Orders or waiting for the Courts the new way if the Executive Branch determines the ends justifies the means?
Honest questions. Because we are now at a point where we have creative Executive Orders and Sec of State's saying they do not have to tell Congress about using the military if the mission is deemed so. Nevermind, Trump's leaking comments...
They are picking areas that no one wants to fight, such as Maduro, drug dealers, etc. to set precedent. Now, Trump is saying we can do this more. Is Cuba, Panama Canal, Greenland on the table? As Trump said, Who is going to stop us?
Is that what we want.
obviously, a liberal
Yeah to this group, have to be to discuss process.
Funny, nowhere does this specific situation show up in the Constitution saying the United States has to do what FLBear wants.
Bottom line, you are spewing spite because 'Trump'.
Cry more.
Roll of Eyes.
You are good with this, no issue.
Do you feel the same with a Democrat President doing their thing with emergency declarations and EOs?
Sure. See Obama taking out Osama bin Laden, for example.
You want Maduro treated with the same respect due a duly elected President, and you want the narco state aspect to be ignored.
This is why no serious adult is going to support your position.
You can't be serious. Some of you guys have morphed your positions so much from the beginning of this thread it's almost comical.
boognish_bear said:You see a lot claims that Venezuela has nothing to do with drugs because most of the fentanyl comes from elsewhere. I want to address this:
— JD Vance (@JDVance) January 4, 2026
First off, fentanyl isn't the only drug in the world and there is still fentanyl coming from Venezuela (or at least there was).
Second,…
FLBear5630 said:ATL Bear said:Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:Stranger said:FLBear5630 said:
Ok, does process matter? Does the Constitution matter? I think based on the responses we have seen this year, it is something that deserves discussion.
Does following the Constitution and trying to follow the Constitution matter any more? OR, is finding creative ways around it through Executive Orders or waiting for the Courts the new way if the Executive Branch determines the ends justifies the means?
Honest questions. Because we are now at a point where we have creative Executive Orders and Sec of State's saying they do not have to tell Congress about using the military if the mission is deemed so. Nevermind, Trump's leaking comments...
They are picking areas that no one wants to fight, such as Maduro, drug dealers, etc. to set precedent. Now, Trump is saying we can do this more. Is Cuba, Panama Canal, Greenland on the table? As Trump said, Who is going to stop us?
Is that what we want.
obviously, a liberal
Yeah to this group, have to be to discuss process.
Funny, nowhere does this specific situation show up in the Constitution saying the United States has to do what FLBear wants.
Bottom line, you are spewing spite because 'Trump'.
Cry more.
Roll of Eyes.
You are good with this, no issue.
Do you feel the same with a Democrat President doing their thing with emergency declarations and EOs?
Sure. See Obama taking out Osama bin Laden, for example.
You want Maduro treated with the same respect due a duly elected President, and you want the narco state aspect to be ignored.
This is why no serious adult is going to support your position.
You can't be serious. Some of you guys have morphed your positions so much from the beginning of this thread it's almost comical.
Thank you! The mental gymnastics have been ridiculous.
Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:ATL Bear said:Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:Stranger said:FLBear5630 said:
Ok, does process matter? Does the Constitution matter? I think based on the responses we have seen this year, it is something that deserves discussion.
Does following the Constitution and trying to follow the Constitution matter any more? OR, is finding creative ways around it through Executive Orders or waiting for the Courts the new way if the Executive Branch determines the ends justifies the means?
Honest questions. Because we are now at a point where we have creative Executive Orders and Sec of State's saying they do not have to tell Congress about using the military if the mission is deemed so. Nevermind, Trump's leaking comments...
They are picking areas that no one wants to fight, such as Maduro, drug dealers, etc. to set precedent. Now, Trump is saying we can do this more. Is Cuba, Panama Canal, Greenland on the table? As Trump said, Who is going to stop us?
Is that what we want.
obviously, a liberal
Yeah to this group, have to be to discuss process.
Funny, nowhere does this specific situation show up in the Constitution saying the United States has to do what FLBear wants.
Bottom line, you are spewing spite because 'Trump'.
Cry more.
Roll of Eyes.
You are good with this, no issue.
Do you feel the same with a Democrat President doing their thing with emergency declarations and EOs?
Sure. See Obama taking out Osama bin Laden, for example.
You want Maduro treated with the same respect due a duly elected President, and you want the narco state aspect to be ignored.
This is why no serious adult is going to support your position.
You can't be serious. Some of you guys have morphed your positions so much from the beginning of this thread it's almost comical.
Thank you! The mental gymnastics have been ridiculous.
So have you two set a date yet, or are you waiting on Newsome's availability to perform the ceremony?
FLBear5630 said:Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:ATL Bear said:Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:Stranger said:FLBear5630 said:
Ok, does process matter? Does the Constitution matter? I think based on the responses we have seen this year, it is something that deserves discussion.
Does following the Constitution and trying to follow the Constitution matter any more? OR, is finding creative ways around it through Executive Orders or waiting for the Courts the new way if the Executive Branch determines the ends justifies the means?
Honest questions. Because we are now at a point where we have creative Executive Orders and Sec of State's saying they do not have to tell Congress about using the military if the mission is deemed so. Nevermind, Trump's leaking comments...
They are picking areas that no one wants to fight, such as Maduro, drug dealers, etc. to set precedent. Now, Trump is saying we can do this more. Is Cuba, Panama Canal, Greenland on the table? As Trump said, Who is going to stop us?
Is that what we want.
obviously, a liberal
Yeah to this group, have to be to discuss process.
Funny, nowhere does this specific situation show up in the Constitution saying the United States has to do what FLBear wants.
Bottom line, you are spewing spite because 'Trump'.
Cry more.
Roll of Eyes.
You are good with this, no issue.
Do you feel the same with a Democrat President doing their thing with emergency declarations and EOs?
Sure. See Obama taking out Osama bin Laden, for example.
You want Maduro treated with the same respect due a duly elected President, and you want the narco state aspect to be ignored.
This is why no serious adult is going to support your position.
You can't be serious. Some of you guys have morphed your positions so much from the beginning of this thread it's almost comical.
Thank you! The mental gymnastics have been ridiculous.
So have you two set a date yet, or are you waiting on Newsome's availability to perform the ceremony?
yawn...
Personally, I find it incredibly satisfying to see the United States:
— Matt Van Swol (@mattvanswol) January 4, 2026
A) take down evil dictators that oppress their own people
B) Get back stolen American company’s assets
…all without any American casualties whatsoever
Incredibly badass.
Harrison Bergeron said:
This may be the biggest example of TDS and Democrat Idiocracy and hypocrisy and overall stupidity ... this is why we cannot have nice things ...
1. Barry literally did the same thing in Libya
2. Barry literally killed more than 3,000 people without "due process"
3. Barry and Biden put a bounty on Maduro
4. Biden made a stupid tweet claiming Trump was a Maduro puppett
Now this morons are butthurt over taking him out. You cannot take these kids of idiots seriously in any way shape or form.
No, I'm holding out for you. If you can suck even half as much as your posts do, I might be willing to switch teams.Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:ATL Bear said:Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:Stranger said:FLBear5630 said:
Ok, does process matter? Does the Constitution matter? I think based on the responses we have seen this year, it is something that deserves discussion.
Does following the Constitution and trying to follow the Constitution matter any more? OR, is finding creative ways around it through Executive Orders or waiting for the Courts the new way if the Executive Branch determines the ends justifies the means?
Honest questions. Because we are now at a point where we have creative Executive Orders and Sec of State's saying they do not have to tell Congress about using the military if the mission is deemed so. Nevermind, Trump's leaking comments...
They are picking areas that no one wants to fight, such as Maduro, drug dealers, etc. to set precedent. Now, Trump is saying we can do this more. Is Cuba, Panama Canal, Greenland on the table? As Trump said, Who is going to stop us?
Is that what we want.
obviously, a liberal
Yeah to this group, have to be to discuss process.
Funny, nowhere does this specific situation show up in the Constitution saying the United States has to do what FLBear wants.
Bottom line, you are spewing spite because 'Trump'.
Cry more.
Roll of Eyes.
You are good with this, no issue.
Do you feel the same with a Democrat President doing their thing with emergency declarations and EOs?
Sure. See Obama taking out Osama bin Laden, for example.
You want Maduro treated with the same respect due a duly elected President, and you want the narco state aspect to be ignored.
This is why no serious adult is going to support your position.
You can't be serious. Some of you guys have morphed your positions so much from the beginning of this thread it's almost comical.
Thank you! The mental gymnastics have been ridiculous.
So have you two set a date yet, or are you waiting on Newsome's availability to perform the ceremony?
ATL Bear said:Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:ATL Bear said:Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:Stranger said:FLBear5630 said:
Ok, does process matter? Does the Constitution matter? I think based on the responses we have seen this year, it is something that deserves discussion.
Does following the Constitution and trying to follow the Constitution matter any more? OR, is finding creative ways around it through Executive Orders or waiting for the Courts the new way if the Executive Branch determines the ends justifies the means?
Honest questions. Because we are now at a point where we have creative Executive Orders and Sec of State's saying they do not have to tell Congress about using the military if the mission is deemed so. Nevermind, Trump's leaking comments...
They are picking areas that no one wants to fight, such as Maduro, drug dealers, etc. to set precedent. Now, Trump is saying we can do this more. Is Cuba, Panama Canal, Greenland on the table? As Trump said, Who is going to stop us?
Is that what we want.
obviously, a liberal
Yeah to this group, have to be to discuss process.
Funny, nowhere does this specific situation show up in the Constitution saying the United States has to do what FLBear wants.
Bottom line, you are spewing spite because 'Trump'.
Cry more.
Roll of Eyes.
You are good with this, no issue.
Do you feel the same with a Democrat President doing their thing with emergency declarations and EOs?
Sure. See Obama taking out Osama bin Laden, for example.
You want Maduro treated with the same respect due a duly elected President, and you want the narco state aspect to be ignored.
This is why no serious adult is going to support your position.
You can't be serious. Some of you guys have morphed your positions so much from the beginning of this thread it's almost comical.
Thank you! The mental gymnastics have been ridiculous.
So have you two set a date yet, or are you waiting on Newsome's availability to perform the ceremony?
No, I'm holding out for you. If you can suck even half as much as your posts do, I might be willing to switch teams.
Barry was wrong on Libya. In fact they were wrong on the entire Arab Spring farce. I guess we are in the midst of the Fentanyl Fall. And Trump not Biden or Barry put the reward on Maduro's arrest. I'm okay with that. I'm just amazed at the "we're not the world's police crowd", cheering on us literally being the police with our military.Harrison Bergeron said:
This may be the biggest example of TDS and Democrat Idiocracy and hypocrisy and overall stupidity ... this is why we cannot have nice things ...
1. Barry literally did the same thing in Libya
2. Barry literally killed more than 3,000 people without "due process"
3. Barry and Biden put a bounty on Maduro
4. Biden made a stupid tweet claiming Trump was a Maduro puppett
Now this morons are butthurt over taking him out. You cannot take these kids of idiots seriously in any way shape or form.
You're the one who decided to play the homosexuality insult game. Don't toss the insult if you can't handle the comeback.Oldbear83 said:ATL Bear said:Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:ATL Bear said:Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:Stranger said:FLBear5630 said:
Ok, does process matter? Does the Constitution matter? I think based on the responses we have seen this year, it is something that deserves discussion.
Does following the Constitution and trying to follow the Constitution matter any more? OR, is finding creative ways around it through Executive Orders or waiting for the Courts the new way if the Executive Branch determines the ends justifies the means?
Honest questions. Because we are now at a point where we have creative Executive Orders and Sec of State's saying they do not have to tell Congress about using the military if the mission is deemed so. Nevermind, Trump's leaking comments...
They are picking areas that no one wants to fight, such as Maduro, drug dealers, etc. to set precedent. Now, Trump is saying we can do this more. Is Cuba, Panama Canal, Greenland on the table? As Trump said, Who is going to stop us?
Is that what we want.
obviously, a liberal
Yeah to this group, have to be to discuss process.
Funny, nowhere does this specific situation show up in the Constitution saying the United States has to do what FLBear wants.
Bottom line, you are spewing spite because 'Trump'.
Cry more.
Roll of Eyes.
You are good with this, no issue.
Do you feel the same with a Democrat President doing their thing with emergency declarations and EOs?
Sure. See Obama taking out Osama bin Laden, for example.
You want Maduro treated with the same respect due a duly elected President, and you want the narco state aspect to be ignored.
This is why no serious adult is going to support your position.
You can't be serious. Some of you guys have morphed your positions so much from the beginning of this thread it's almost comical.
Thank you! The mental gymnastics have been ridiculous.
So have you two set a date yet, or are you waiting on Newsome's availability to perform the ceremony?
No, I'm holding out for you. If you can suck even half as much as your posts do, I might be willing to switch teams.
So, in addition to cheering against America, you are pro-pervert.
The only sucking here are your logic and morals.
boognish_bear said:BREAKING: Trump says U.S. oil companies will pour BILLIONS into Venezuela.
— Marc Nixon (@MarcNixon24) January 3, 2026
Canadian INVESTMENTS about to FLOOD OUT
Mark Carney is watching our leverage evaporate.
It’s time for a SNAP ELECTION.
Canadians decide:
Net Zero ideology or economic survival pic.twitter.com/uEI3r9CbfN
Oldbear83 said:ATL Bear said:Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:ATL Bear said:Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:Stranger said:FLBear5630 said:
Ok, does process matter? Does the Constitution matter? I think based on the responses we have seen this year, it is something that deserves discussion.
Does following the Constitution and trying to follow the Constitution matter any more? OR, is finding creative ways around it through Executive Orders or waiting for the Courts the new way if the Executive Branch determines the ends justifies the means?
Honest questions. Because we are now at a point where we have creative Executive Orders and Sec of State's saying they do not have to tell Congress about using the military if the mission is deemed so. Nevermind, Trump's leaking comments...
They are picking areas that no one wants to fight, such as Maduro, drug dealers, etc. to set precedent. Now, Trump is saying we can do this more. Is Cuba, Panama Canal, Greenland on the table? As Trump said, Who is going to stop us?
Is that what we want.
obviously, a liberal
Yeah to this group, have to be to discuss process.
Funny, nowhere does this specific situation show up in the Constitution saying the United States has to do what FLBear wants.
Bottom line, you are spewing spite because 'Trump'.
Cry more.
Roll of Eyes.
You are good with this, no issue.
Do you feel the same with a Democrat President doing their thing with emergency declarations and EOs?
Sure. See Obama taking out Osama bin Laden, for example.
You want Maduro treated with the same respect due a duly elected President, and you want the narco state aspect to be ignored.
This is why no serious adult is going to support your position.
You can't be serious. Some of you guys have morphed your positions so much from the beginning of this thread it's almost comical.
Thank you! The mental gymnastics have been ridiculous.
So have you two set a date yet, or are you waiting on Newsome's availability to perform the ceremony?
No, I'm holding out for you. If you can suck even half as much as your posts do, I might be willing to switch teams.
So, in addition to cheering against America, you are pro-pervert.
The only sucking here are your logic and morals.
ATL Bear said:Barry was wrong on Libya. In fact they were wrong on the entire Arab Spring farce. I guess we are in the midst of the Fentanyl Fall. And Trump not Biden or Barry put the reward on Maduro's arrest. I'm okay with that. I'm just amazed at the "we're not the world's police crowd", cheering on us literally being the police with our military.Harrison Bergeron said:
This may be the biggest example of TDS and Democrat Idiocracy and hypocrisy and overall stupidity ... this is why we cannot have nice things ...
1. Barry literally did the same thing in Libya
2. Barry literally killed more than 3,000 people without "due process"
3. Barry and Biden put a bounty on Maduro
4. Biden made a stupid tweet claiming Trump was a Maduro puppett
Now this morons are butthurt over taking him out. You cannot take these kids of idiots seriously in any way shape or form.
Democrats do NOT understand Latinos. It’s been entertaining watching them gasp that some international dorks won’t like what Trump did to Maduro. Let me explain something:
— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) January 4, 2026
The VAST majority of Latino voters are religious conservatives BUT value one thing above all: Strength.… pic.twitter.com/wxoe83e1g9
Harrison Bergeron said:ATL Bear said:Barry was wrong on Libya. In fact they were wrong on the entire Arab Spring farce. I guess we are in the midst of the Fentanyl Fall. And Trump not Biden or Barry put the reward on Maduro's arrest. I'm okay with that. I'm just amazed at the "we're not the world's police crowd", cheering on us literally being the police with our military.Harrison Bergeron said:
This may be the biggest example of TDS and Democrat Idiocracy and hypocrisy and overall stupidity ... this is why we cannot have nice things ...
1. Barry literally did the same thing in Libya
2. Barry literally killed more than 3,000 people without "due process"
3. Barry and Biden put a bounty on Maduro
4. Biden made a stupid tweet claiming Trump was a Maduro puppett
Now this morons are butthurt over taking him out. You cannot take these kids of idiots seriously in any way shape or form.
Just to be clear - I stated earlier not sure I support the action - I am just laughing at the hypocrisy. Everyone on this board projects my hatred of hypocrisy into support of Trump
or something else. These ****ing hypocritical loons were not marching when Barry murdered Quaddaffi.
ATL Bear said:Harrison Bergeron said:
This may be the biggest example of TDS and Democrat Idiocracy and hypocrisy and overall stupidity ... this is why we cannot have nice things ...
1. Barry literally did the same thing in Libya
2. Barry literally killed more than 3,000 people without "due process"
3. Barry and Biden put a bounty on Maduro
4. Biden made a stupid tweet claiming Trump was a Maduro puppett
Now this morons are butthurt over taking him out. You cannot take these kids of idiots seriously in any way shape or form.
Barry was wrong on Libya. In fact they were wrong on the entire Arab Spring farce. I guess we are in the midst of the Fentanyl Fall. And Trump not Biden or Barry put the reward on Maduro's arrest. I'm okay with that. I'm just amazed at the "we're not the world's police crowd", cheering on us literally being the police with our military.
ATL Bear said:Oldbear83 said:ATL Bear said:Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:ATL Bear said:Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:Oldbear83 said:FLBear5630 said:Stranger said:FLBear5630 said:
Ok, does process matter? Does the Constitution matter? I think based on the responses we have seen this year, it is something that deserves discussion.
Does following the Constitution and trying to follow the Constitution matter any more? OR, is finding creative ways around it through Executive Orders or waiting for the Courts the new way if the Executive Branch determines the ends justifies the means?
Honest questions. Because we are now at a point where we have creative Executive Orders and Sec of State's saying they do not have to tell Congress about using the military if the mission is deemed so. Nevermind, Trump's leaking comments...
They are picking areas that no one wants to fight, such as Maduro, drug dealers, etc. to set precedent. Now, Trump is saying we can do this more. Is Cuba, Panama Canal, Greenland on the table? As Trump said, Who is going to stop us?
Is that what we want.
obviously, a liberal
Yeah to this group, have to be to discuss process.
Funny, nowhere does this specific situation show up in the Constitution saying the United States has to do what FLBear wants.
Bottom line, you are spewing spite because 'Trump'.
Cry more.
Roll of Eyes.
You are good with this, no issue.
Do you feel the same with a Democrat President doing their thing with emergency declarations and EOs?
Sure. See Obama taking out Osama bin Laden, for example.
You want Maduro treated with the same respect due a duly elected President, and you want the narco state aspect to be ignored.
This is why no serious adult is going to support your position.
You can't be serious. Some of you guys have morphed your positions so much from the beginning of this thread it's almost comical.
Thank you! The mental gymnastics have been ridiculous.
So have you two set a date yet, or are you waiting on Newsome's availability to perform the ceremony?
No, I'm holding out for you. If you can suck even half as much as your posts do, I might be willing to switch teams.
So, in addition to cheering against America, you are pro-pervert.
The only sucking here are your logic and morals.
You're the one who decided to play the homosexuality insult game. Don't toss the insult if you can't handle the comeback.
BREAKING: Oil prices fall -1% and natural gas prices fall -4% as US futures markets open for the first time since President Maduro was captured.
— The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) January 4, 2026
Energy prices are DROPPING amid a major escalation in geopolitical tensions.
This should tell you all you need to know. https://t.co/JBbTPxf97E pic.twitter.com/72PTXxNx8w
boognish_bear said:BREAKING: Oil prices fall -1% and natural gas prices fall -4% as US futures markets open for the first time since President Maduro was captured.
— The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) January 4, 2026
Energy prices are DROPPING amid a major escalation in geopolitical tensions.
This should tell you all you need to know. https://t.co/JBbTPxf97E pic.twitter.com/72PTXxNx8w
THERE IT IS 🚨 This is footage from the San Diego California “Hands Off Venezuela” protest getting ready to take place today
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) January 4, 2026
What do you notice? These are the EXACT SAME protest signs used in New York, Chicago, Florida, Boston and Portland (Below)
This is PAID and ORGANIZED by… https://t.co/IQ0NbCh5Eb pic.twitter.com/1nlqffj1ic
It’s not American oil. It’s Venezuelan oil.
— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) January 4, 2026
Oil companies entered into risky deals to develop oil, and the deals were canceled by a prior Venezuelan government.
What’s happening: lives of US soldiers are being risked to make those oil companies (not Americans) more profitable. https://t.co/L8GVYt6g5l
FLBear5630 said:Harrison Bergeron said:ATL Bear said:Barry was wrong on Libya. In fact they were wrong on the entire Arab Spring farce. I guess we are in the midst of the Fentanyl Fall. And Trump not Biden or Barry put the reward on Maduro's arrest. I'm okay with that. I'm just amazed at the "we're not the world's police crowd", cheering on us literally being the police with our military.Harrison Bergeron said:
This may be the biggest example of TDS and Democrat Idiocracy and hypocrisy and overall stupidity ... this is why we cannot have nice things ...
1. Barry literally did the same thing in Libya
2. Barry literally killed more than 3,000 people without "due process"
3. Barry and Biden put a bounty on Maduro
4. Biden made a stupid tweet claiming Trump was a Maduro puppett
Now this morons are butthurt over taking him out. You cannot take these kids of idiots seriously in any way shape or form.
Just to be clear - I stated earlier not sure I support the action - I am just laughing at the hypocrisy. Everyone on this board projects my hatred of hypocrisy into support of Trump
or something else. These ****ing hypocritical loons were not marching when Barry murdered Quaddaffi.
As with most of what he does, it is not WHAT he did. It is HOW he does it and what he says.
Rather than calling people names, it is an opportunity to discuss why he does it and if there needs to be changes.
But, so far the MAGAs prefer to call names and chalk wverything up to being liberal.
boognish_bear said:It’s not American oil. It’s Venezuelan oil.
— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) January 4, 2026
Oil companies entered into risky deals to develop oil, and the deals were canceled by a prior Venezuelan government.
What’s happening: lives of US soldiers are being risked to make those oil companies (not Americans) more profitable. https://t.co/L8GVYt6g5l