Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

NO that is not how it works at all. I am waiting for valid proof but no one can provide that.

No one has been able to explain how it is white privilege to be on food stamps, or all the poor whites in numerous areas of the country on welfare.

Or any other example of white privilige.

The most I get is statements like yours that because "I don't get it, I don't see it."

---

It's very easy to explain. If you're a white person on food stamps, you're less likely to go to prison than a black person, on food stamps, who behaves the same way you do.

---

Since when did being on food stamps become a crime?

---

It's not a crime, though one could easily make that mistake listening to some conservatives talk about it.

---

Then why would a person of any color go to prison for being on food stamps as you implied?

---

They wouldn't. They'd be more likely to go to prison for whatever crimes they did or were accused of doing.

---

So they are going to prison because of a crime they commit?

So the food stamps have zero to do with them being sent to prison and is unrelated to an attempt to prove white privilege as I've asked.

---

You asked how a white person on food stamps is privileged. They're privileged to this extent: they're less likely to go to prison than a similarly situated black person who commits or doesn't commit the same crimes that the white person commits or doesn't commit. It may not be much, but it's something.

---

False equivalence.

Food stamps has no impact on going to or staying out of prison.

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

NO that is not how it works at all. I am waiting for valid proof but no one can provide that.

No one has been able to explain how it is white privilege to be on food stamps, or all the poor whites in numerous areas of the country on welfare.

Or any other example of white privilige.

The most I get is statements like yours that because "I don't get it, I don't see it."

---

It's very easy to explain. If you're a white person on food stamps, you're less likely to go to prison than a black person, on food stamps, who behaves the same way you do.

---

Since when did being on food stamps become a crime?

---

It's not a crime, though one could easily make that mistake listening to some conservatives talk about it.

---

Then why would a person of any color go to prison for being on food stamps as you implied?

---

They wouldn't. They'd be more likely to go to prison for whatever crimes they did or were accused of doing.

---

So they are going to prison because of a crime they commit?

So the food stamps have zero to do with them being sent to prison and is unrelated to an attempt to prove white privilege as I've asked.

---

You asked how a white person on food stamps is privileged. They're privileged to this extent: they're less likely to go to prison than a similarly situated black person who commits or doesn't commit the same crimes that the white person commits or doesn't commit. It may not be much, but it's something.

---

Blacks are 70% fatherless. Is this because of white privilege or do racial cultures behave differently?

---

Being fatherless isn't a crime.

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

NO that is not how it works at all. I am waiting for valid proof but no one can provide that.

No one has been able to explain how it is white privilege to be on food stamps, or all the poor whites in numerous areas of the country on welfare.

Or any other example of white privilige.

The most I get is statements like yours that because "I don't get it, I don't see it."

---

It's very easy to explain. If you're a white person on food stamps, you're less likely to go to prison than a black person, on food stamps, who behaves the same way you do.

---

Since when did being on food stamps become a crime?

---

It's not a crime, though one could easily make that mistake listening to some conservatives talk about it.

---

Then why would a person of any color go to prison for being on food stamps as you implied?

---

They wouldn't. They'd be more likely to go to prison for whatever crimes they did or were accused of doing.

---

So they are going to prison because of a crime they commit?

So the food stamps have zero to do with them being sent to prison and is unrelated to an attempt to prove white privilege as I've asked.

---

You asked how a white person on food stamps is privileged. They're privileged to this extent: they're less likely to go to prison than a similarly situated black person who commits or doesn't commit the same crimes that the white person commits or doesn't commit. It may not be much, but it's something.

---

False equivalence.

Food stamps has no impact on going to or staying out of prison.

---

Bingo! So if it's not the food stamps, what is it?

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

NO that is not how it works at all. I am waiting for valid proof but no one can provide that.

No one has been able to explain how it is white privilege to be on food stamps, or all the poor whites in numerous areas of the country on welfare.

Or any other example of white privilige.

The most I get is statements like yours that because "I don't get it, I don't see it."

---

It's very easy to explain. If you're a white person on food stamps, you're less likely to go to prison than a black person, on food stamps, who behaves the same way you do.

---

Since when did being on food stamps become a crime?

---

It's not a crime, though one could easily make that mistake listening to some conservatives talk about it.

---

Then why would a person of any color go to prison for being on food stamps as you implied?

---

They wouldn't. They'd be more likely to go to prison for whatever crimes they did or were accused of doing.

---

So they are going to prison because of a crime they commit?

So the food stamps have zero to do with them being sent to prison and is unrelated to an attempt to prove white privilege as I've asked.

---

You asked how a white person on food stamps is privileged. They're privileged to this extent: they're less likely to go to prison than a similarly situated black person who commits or doesn't commit the same crimes that the white person commits or doesn't commit. It may not be much, but it's something.

---

Blacks are 70% fatherless. Is this because of white privilege or do racial cultures behave differently?

---

Being fatherless isn't a crime.

---

But what is the reason for Blacks being 70%+ fatherless?

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

NO that is not how it works at all. I am waiting for valid proof but no one can provide that.

No one has been able to explain how it is white privilege to be on food stamps, or all the poor whites in numerous areas of the country on welfare.

Or any other example of white privilige.

The most I get is statements like yours that because "I don't get it, I don't see it."

---

It's very easy to explain. If you're a white person on food stamps, you're less likely to go to prison than a black person, on food stamps, who behaves the same way you do.

---

Since when did being on food stamps become a crime?

---

It's not a crime, though one could easily make that mistake listening to some conservatives talk about it.

---

Then why would a person of any color go to prison for being on food stamps as you implied?

---

They wouldn't. They'd be more likely to go to prison for whatever crimes they did or were accused of doing.

---

So they are going to prison because of a crime they commit?

So the food stamps have zero to do with them being sent to prison and is unrelated to an attempt to prove white privilege as I've asked.

---

You asked how a white person on food stamps is privileged. They're privileged to this extent: they're less likely to go to prison than a similarly situated black person who commits or doesn't commit the same crimes that the white person commits or doesn't commit. It may not be much, but it's something.

---

This claim has been repeatedly and effectively debunked. Sam is using drug laws and is comparing open air (plain sight street corner) drug transactions (mostly black) to private (behind closed doors) transactions (mostly white). He's pretending that the degree of uber-overt and flagrant law breaking in which one engages doesn't impact arrests and convictions.

He also ignores associated crimes (weapons violations, assaults, attempted murders, etc) as well as criminal records.

His argument is essentially that no matter how flagrant and visible the violation, police clairvoyant units and X-ray vision should ensure parity in arrests by race.

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

NO that is not how it works at all. I am waiting for valid proof but no one can provide that.

No one has been able to explain how it is white privilege to be on food stamps, or all the poor whites in numerous areas of the country on welfare.

Or any other example of white privilige.

The most I get is statements like yours that because "I don't get it, I don't see it."

---

It's very easy to explain. If you're a white person on food stamps, you're less likely to go to prison than a black person, on food stamps, who behaves the same way you do.

---

Since when did being on food stamps become a crime?

---

It's not a crime, though one could easily make that mistake listening to some conservatives talk about it.

---

Then why would a person of any color go to prison for being on food stamps as you implied?

---

They wouldn't. They'd be more likely to go to prison for whatever crimes they did or were accused of doing.

---

So they are going to prison because of a crime they commit?

So the food stamps have zero to do with them being sent to prison and is unrelated to an attempt to prove white privilege as I've asked.

---

You asked how a white person on food stamps is privileged. They're privileged to this extent: they're less likely to go to prison than a similarly situated black person who commits or doesn't commit the same crimes that the white person commits or doesn't commit. It may not be much, but it's something.

---

Blacks are 70% fatherless. Is this because of white privilege or do racial cultures behave differently?

---

Being fatherless isn't a crime.

---

But what is the reason for Blacks being 70%+ fatherless?

---

1. Whites force blacks to have unprotected sex by holding a gun to their heads and threatening them with death if they pull out or wrap it.
2. The 'black' American subculture is forced to value baby mommas over marriage and it's whites who write those rap lyrics
3. There haven't been enough abortions/murders of black babies because whites want high crime from fatherless kids as long as they're black
4. White people are white and Asian people are Asian and these two facts make black families refuse creation due to a pseudo gravitational field that repels black men and wedding rings


It's really all white honkies at fault. We know this!!!

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

NO that is not how it works at all. I am waiting for valid proof but no one can provide that.

No one has been able to explain how it is white privilege to be on food stamps, or all the poor whites in numerous areas of the country on welfare.

Or any other example of white privilige.

The most I get is statements like yours that because "I don't get it, I don't see it."

---

It's very easy to explain. If you're a white person on food stamps, you're less likely to go to prison than a black person, on food stamps, who behaves the same way you do.

---

Since when did being on food stamps become a crime?

---

It's not a crime, though one could easily make that mistake listening to some conservatives talk about it.

---

Then why would a person of any color go to prison for being on food stamps as you implied?

---

They wouldn't. They'd be more likely to go to prison for whatever crimes they did or were accused of doing.

---

So they are going to prison because of a crime they commit?

So the food stamps have zero to do with them being sent to prison and is unrelated to an attempt to prove white privilege as I've asked.

---

You asked how a white person on food stamps is privileged. They're privileged to this extent: they're less likely to go to prison than a similarly situated black person who commits or doesn't commit the same crimes that the white person commits or doesn't commit. It may not be much, but it's something.

---

Blacks are 70% fatherless. Is this because of white privilege or do racial cultures behave differently?

---

Being fatherless isn't a crime.

---

But what is the reason for Blacks being 70%+ fatherless?

---

Lack of economic opportunity. Perverse incentives in the welfare system. The sexual revolution. The drug war.

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

I still haven't received a good answer:
What should I do about my white privilege?

Advocate for a white tax? Give away my money? Tell white people they're evil? Don't hire any whites?

---

I gave you an answer. It doesn't require any of the nonsense you listed.

GolemIII said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

NO that is not how it works at all. I am waiting for valid proof but no one can provide that.

No one has been able to explain how it is white privilege to be on food stamps, or all the poor whites in numerous areas of the country on welfare.

Or any other example of white privilige.

The most I get is statements like yours that because "I don't get it, I don't see it."

---

It's very easy to explain. If you're a white person on food stamps, you're less likely to go to prison than a black person, on food stamps, who behaves the same way you do.

---

Since when did being on food stamps become a crime?

---

It's not a crime, though one could easily make that mistake listening to some conservatives talk about it.

---

Then why would a person of any color go to prison for being on food stamps as you implied?

---

They wouldn't. They'd be more likely to go to prison for whatever crimes they did or were accused of doing.

---

So they are going to prison because of a crime they commit?

So the food stamps have zero to do with them being sent to prison and is unrelated to an attempt to prove white privilege as I've asked.

---

You asked how a white person on food stamps is privileged. They're privileged to this extent: they're less likely to go to prison than a similarly situated black person who commits or doesn't commit the same crimes that the white person commits or doesn't commit. It may not be much, but it's something.

---

This claim has been repeatedly and effectively debunked. Sam is using drug laws and is comparing open air (plain sight street corner) drug transactions (mostly black) to private (behind closed doors) transactions (mostly white). He's pretending that the degree of uber-overt and flagrant law breaking in which one engages doesn't impact arrests and convictions.

He also ignores associated crimes (weapons violations, assaults, attempted murders, etc) as well as criminal records.

His argument is essentially that no matter how flagrant and visible the violation, police clairvoyant units and X-ray vision should ensure parity in arrests by race.

---

Not true at all. It's not just open air drug dealers who are more likely to be stopped. It's also blacks driving in their cars. Blacks are more likely to go to prison, and stay for longer, than whites with the same history. The disparities show up in apples to apples comparisons no matter how you slice it.

quash said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

I still haven't received a good answer:
What should I do about my white privilege?

Advocate for a white tax? Give away my money? Tell white people they're evil? Don't hire any whites?

---

I gave you an answer. It doesn't require any of the nonsense you listed.

---

Can you give me an example or scenario of me doing something about my white privilege?

Sam Lowry said:

---

GolemIII said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

NO that is not how it works at all. I am waiting for valid proof but no one can provide that.

No one has been able to explain how it is white privilege to be on food stamps, or all the poor whites in numerous areas of the country on welfare.

Or any other example of white privilige.

The most I get is statements like yours that because "I don't get it, I don't see it."

---

It's very easy to explain. If you're a white person on food stamps, you're less likely to go to prison than a black person, on food stamps, who behaves the same way you do.

---

Since when did being on food stamps become a crime?

---

It's not a crime, though one could easily make that mistake listening to some conservatives talk about it.

---

Then why would a person of any color go to prison for being on food stamps as you implied?

---

They wouldn't. They'd be more likely to go to prison for whatever crimes they did or were accused of doing.

---

So they are going to prison because of a crime they commit?

So the food stamps have zero to do with them being sent to prison and is unrelated to an attempt to prove white privilege as I've asked.

---

You asked how a white person on food stamps is privileged. They're privileged to this extent: they're less likely to go to prison than a similarly situated black person who commits or doesn't commit the same crimes that the white person commits or doesn't commit. It may not be much, but it's something.

---

This claim has been repeatedly and effectively debunked. Sam is using drug laws and is comparing open air (plain sight street corner) drug transactions (mostly black) to private (behind closed doors) transactions (mostly white). He's pretending that the degree of uber-overt and flagrant law breaking in which one engages doesn't impact arrests and convictions.

He also ignores associated crimes (weapons violations, assaults, attempted murders, etc) as well as criminal records.

His argument is essentially that no matter how flagrant and visible the violation, police clairvoyant units and X-ray vision should ensure parity in arrests by race.

---

Not true at all. It's not just open air drug dealers who are more likely to be stopped. It's also blacks driving in their cars. Blacks are more likely to go to prison, and stay for longer, than whites with the same history. The disparities show up in apples to apples comparisons no matter how you slice it.

---

Who gets stopped, who gets searched, who gets arrested, who gets charged, who gets pre-trial diversion, who gets convicted, who gets prison.

Sam Lowry said:

---

GolemIII said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

NO that is not how it works at all. I am waiting for valid proof but no one can provide that.

No one has been able to explain how it is white privilege to be on food stamps, or all the poor whites in numerous areas of the country on welfare.

Or any other example of white privilige.

The most I get is statements like yours that because "I don't get it, I don't see it."

---

It's very easy to explain. If you're a white person on food stamps, you're less likely to go to prison than a black person, on food stamps, who behaves the same way you do.

---

Since when did being on food stamps become a crime?

---

It's not a crime, though one could easily make that mistake listening to some conservatives talk about it.

---

Then why would a person of any color go to prison for being on food stamps as you implied?

---

They wouldn't. They'd be more likely to go to prison for whatever crimes they did or were accused of doing.

---

So they are going to prison because of a crime they commit?

So the food stamps have zero to do with them being sent to prison and is unrelated to an attempt to prove white privilege as I've asked.

---

You asked how a white person on food stamps is privileged. They're privileged to this extent: they're less likely to go to prison than a similarly situated black person who commits or doesn't commit the same crimes that the white person commits or doesn't commit. It may not be much, but it's something.

---

This claim has been repeatedly and effectively debunked. Sam is using drug laws and is comparing open air (plain sight street corner) drug transactions (mostly black) to private (behind closed doors) transactions (mostly white). He's pretending that the degree of uber-overt and flagrant law breaking in which one engages doesn't impact arrests and convictions.

He also ignores associated crimes (weapons violations, assaults, attempted murders, etc) as well as criminal records.

His argument is essentially that no matter how flagrant and visible the violation, police clairvoyant units and X-ray vision should ensure parity in arrests by race.

---

Not true at all. It's not just open air drug dealers who are more likely to be stopped. It's also blacks driving in their cars. Blacks are more likely to go to prison, and stay for longer, than whites with the same history. The disparities show up in apples to apples comparisons no matter how you slice it.

---

That's simply not true. You are referencing apples to tennis balls and you can't do otherwise.

quash said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

GolemIII said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

NO that is not how it works at all. I am waiting for valid proof but no one can provide that.

No one has been able to explain how it is white privilege to be on food stamps, or all the poor whites in numerous areas of the country on welfare.

Or any other example of white privilige.

The most I get is statements like yours that because "I don't get it, I don't see it."

---

It's very easy to explain. If you're a white person on food stamps, you're less likely to go to prison than a black person, on food stamps, who behaves the same way you do.

---

Since when did being on food stamps become a crime?

---

It's not a crime, though one could easily make that mistake listening to some conservatives talk about it.

---

Then why would a person of any color go to prison for being on food stamps as you implied?

---

They wouldn't. They'd be more likely to go to prison for whatever crimes they did or were accused of doing.

---

So they are going to prison because of a crime they commit?

So the food stamps have zero to do with them being sent to prison and is unrelated to an attempt to prove white privilege as I've asked.

---

You asked how a white person on food stamps is privileged. They're privileged to this extent: they're less likely to go to prison than a similarly situated black person who commits or doesn't commit the same crimes that the white person commits or doesn't commit. It may not be much, but it's something.

---

This claim has been repeatedly and effectively debunked. Sam is using drug laws and is comparing open air (plain sight street corner) drug transactions (mostly black) to private (behind closed doors) transactions (mostly white). He's pretending that the degree of uber-overt and flagrant law breaking in which one engages doesn't impact arrests and convictions.

He also ignores associated crimes (weapons violations, assaults, attempted murders, etc) as well as criminal records.

His argument is essentially that no matter how flagrant and visible the violation, police clairvoyant units and X-ray vision should ensure parity in arrests by race.

---

Not true at all. It's not just open air drug dealers who are more likely to be stopped. It's also blacks driving in their cars. Blacks are more likely to go to prison, and stay for longer, than whites with the same history. The disparities show up in apples to apples comparisons no matter how you slice it.

---

Who gets stopped, who gets searched, who gets arrested, who gets charged, who gets pre-trial diversion, who gets convicted, who gets prison.

---

alot of people, alot of pople, people who are accused of committing a crime, lots of people, criminals, criminals

Whew! That was a tough test.

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

NO that is not how it works at all. I am waiting for valid proof but no one can provide that.

No one has been able to explain how it is white privilege to be on food stamps, or all the poor whites in numerous areas of the country on welfare.

Or any other example of white privilige.

The most I get is statements like yours that because "I don't get it, I don't see it."

---

It's very easy to explain. If you're a white person on food stamps, you're less likely to go to prison than a black person, on food stamps, who behaves the same way you do.

---

Since when did being on food stamps become a crime?

---

It's not a crime, though one could easily make that mistake listening to some conservatives talk about it.

---

Then why would a person of any color go to prison for being on food stamps as you implied?

---

They wouldn't. They'd be more likely to go to prison for whatever crimes they did or were accused of doing.

---

So they are going to prison because of a crime they commit?

So the food stamps have zero to do with them being sent to prison and is unrelated to an attempt to prove white privilege as I've asked.

---

You asked how a white person on food stamps is privileged. They're privileged to this extent: they're less likely to go to prison than a similarly situated black person who commits or doesn't commit the same crimes that the white person commits or doesn't commit. It may not be much, but it's something.

---

Blacks are 70% fatherless. Is this because of white privilege or do racial cultures behave differently?

---

Being fatherless isn't a crime.

---

But what is the reason for Blacks being 70%+ fatherless?

---

Lack of economic opportunity. Perverse incentives in the welfare system. The sexual revolution. The drug war.

---

Welfare system created by democrats to keep blacks voting for them for 100 years is the reason which you mentioned

The other reasons effect all of us the same as blacks

Edit: Democrats can't even talk about fatherless homes being an issue because, well, their LGBT issues

Florda_mike said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

NO that is not how it works at all. I am waiting for valid proof but no one can provide that.

No one has been able to explain how it is white privilege to be on food stamps, or all the poor whites in numerous areas of the country on welfare.

Or any other example of white privilige.

The most I get is statements like yours that because "I don't get it, I don't see it."

---

It's very easy to explain. If you're a white person on food stamps, you're less likely to go to prison than a black person, on food stamps, who behaves the same way you do.

---

Since when did being on food stamps become a crime?

---

It's not a crime, though one could easily make that mistake listening to some conservatives talk about it.

---

Then why would a person of any color go to prison for being on food stamps as you implied?

---

They wouldn't. They'd be more likely to go to prison for whatever crimes they did or were accused of doing.

---

So they are going to prison because of a crime they commit?

So the food stamps have zero to do with them being sent to prison and is unrelated to an attempt to prove white privilege as I've asked.

---

You asked how a white person on food stamps is privileged. They're privileged to this extent: they're less likely to go to prison than a similarly situated black person who commits or doesn't commit the same crimes that the white person commits or doesn't commit. It may not be much, but it's something.

---

Blacks are 70% fatherless. Is this because of white privilege or do racial cultures behave differently?

---

Being fatherless isn't a crime.

---

But what is the reason for Blacks being 70%+ fatherless?

---

Lack of economic opportunity. Perverse incentives in the welfare system. The sexual revolution. The drug war.

---

Welfare system created by democrats to keep blacks voting for them for 100 years is the reason which you mentioned

The other reasons effect all of us the same as blacks

Edit: Democrats can't even talk about fatherless homes being an issue because, well, their LGBT issues

---

Not quite the same. It's a combination of systemic injustice and cultural decay.

Sam Lowry said:

---

Not quite the same. It's a combination of systemic injustice and cultural decay.

---

Welfare system injustice has caused the cultural decay imo fwiw

It hurts me the older I get to see it and remain quiet

It's what I call being on the democrat plantation too

Florda_mike said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Not quite the same. It's a combination of systemic injustice and cultural decay.

---

Welfare system injustice has caused the cultural decay imo fwiw

It hurts me the older I get to see it and remain quiet

It's what I call being on the democrat plantation too

---

Wouldn't have needed the welfare system if we'd allowed blacks to participate in homeownership and Soc Sec.

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Not quite the same. It's a combination of systemic injustice and cultural decay.

---

Welfare system injustice has caused the cultural decay imo fwiw

It hurts me the older I get to see it and remain quiet

It's what I call being on the democrat plantation too

---

Wouldn't have needed the welfare system if we'd allowed blacks to participate in homeownership and Soc Sec.

---

I find this post interesting.

I am unaware of any national case law or litigation in reference to Social Security Act and how it was/has been applied to African Americans specifically.

Please reference a case if you know of one so I can read up on it.

Also, please disregard if "Soc Sec." has a alternate meaning to the one I presumed (Social Security Act of 1935).

Bruce Leroy said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Not quite the same. It's a combination of systemic injustice and cultural decay.

---

Welfare system injustice has caused the cultural decay imo fwiw

It hurts me the older I get to see it and remain quiet

It's what I call being on the democrat plantation too

---

Wouldn't have needed the welfare system if we'd allowed blacks to participate in homeownership and Soc Sec.

---

I find that post interesting.

I am unaware of any national case law or litigation in reference to Social Security Act and how it was/has been applied to African Americans specifically.

Please reference a case if you know of one so I can read up on it.

Please disregard if "Soc Sec." had a alternate meaning.

---

The original law. It excluded ag and domestic workers because those fields were dominated by PoC and the Southern Democrats wanted none of that.

quash said:

---

Bruce Leroy said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Not quite the same. It's a combination of systemic injustice and cultural decay.

---

Welfare system injustice has caused the cultural decay imo fwiw

It hurts me the older I get to see it and remain quiet

It's what I call being on the democrat plantation too

---

Wouldn't have needed the welfare system if we'd allowed blacks to participate in homeownership and Soc Sec.

---

I find that post interesting.

I am unaware of any national case law or litigation in reference to Social Security Act and how it was/has been applied to African Americans specifically.

Please reference a case if you know of one so I can read up on it.

Please disregard if "Soc Sec." had a alternate meaning.

---

The original law. It excluded ag and domestic workers because those fields were dominated by PoC and the Southern Democrats wanted none of that.

---

Katsung? Is that you!?!?

quash said:

---

Bruce Leroy said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Not quite the same. It's a combination of systemic injustice and cultural decay.

---

Welfare system injustice has caused the cultural decay imo fwiw

It hurts me the older I get to see it and remain quiet

It's what I call being on the democrat plantation too

---

Wouldn't have needed the welfare system if we'd allowed blacks to participate in homeownership and Soc Sec.

---

I find that post interesting.

I am unaware of any national case law or litigation in reference to Social Security Act and how it was/has been applied to African Americans specifically.

Please reference a case if you know of one so I can read up on it.

Please disregard if "Soc Sec." had a alternate meaning.

---

The original law. It excluded ag and domestic workers because those fields were dominated by PoC and the Southern Democrats wanted none of that.

---

Interesting interpretation of the law. Since you didn't provide any historical legal challenges on the law, can you link to any historical articles in reference to the crafting of the law?

Were those two classifications of workers you identified the only two or was there others? And if so were they "dominated" by "Poc"?

In total population numbers in 1935 what race of people working as agricultural labor (in the US) would be the most is impacted?

What generally accepted economic event was going on in the 1930's (including 1935) that may/may not have influenced policy makers in determining which classification of workers should be exempt?

Hey White Guys,
Stop being so afraid and defensive.
White privilege is not your fault. No of you asked to be born white. It simply happened.
Acknowledging WP does not mean your racist. It simply means "Oh white privileges exists."
If you looking for blame then look to the founding fathers because they let black slavery stand and that set in motion white privilege. You're the beneficiary of WP. I am too.
But by being aware of WP I work to overcome it and eradicate it.
It's what we do with that knowledge of WP that counts.
WP doesn't insult you or blame you. If you took advantage of your whiteness then we might need to have conversation.
But to blame you for an accident of birth seems silly.
What's the answer? I am not sure but I sm sure that we need to talk to one another about how to overcome it.
I think one of BIG mistakes in the early days of desegregation was that whites made the decisions on how to desegregate. At that time we needed a more collaborative effort.
I think we need collaboration with people of color again.

Bruce Leroy said:

---

quash said:

---

Bruce Leroy said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Not quite the same. It's a combination of systemic injustice and cultural decay.

---

Welfare system injustice has caused the cultural decay imo fwiw

It hurts me the older I get to see it and remain quiet

It's what I call being on the democrat plantation too

---

Wouldn't have needed the welfare system if we'd allowed blacks to participate in homeownership and Soc Sec.

---

I find that post interesting.

I am unaware of any national case law or litigation in reference to Social Security Act and how it was/has been applied to African Americans specifically.

Please reference a case if you know of one so I can read up on it.

Please disregard if "Soc Sec." had a alternate meaning.

---

The original law. It excluded ag and domestic workers because those fields were dominated by PoC and the Southern Democrats wanted none of that.

---

Interesting interpretation of the law. Since you didn't provide any historical legal challenges on the law, can you link to any historical articles in reference to the crafting of the law?

Were those two classifications of workers you identified the only two or was there others? And if so where they "dominated" by "Poc"?

In total population numbers in 1935 what race of people working as agricultural labor (in the US) would be the most is impacted?

What generally accepted economic event was going on in the 1930's (including 1935) that may/may influenced policy makers in determine which classification of workers should be exempt?

---

Lot of questions I have no interest in researching.

Waco1947 said:

---

Hey White Guys,
Stop being so afraid and defensive.
White privilege is not your fault. No of you asked to be born white. It simply happened.
Acknowledging WP does not mean your racist. It simply means "Oh white privileges exists."
If you looking for blame then look to the founding fathers because they let black slavery stand and that set in motion white privilege. You're the beneficiary of WP. I am too.
But by being aware of WP I work to overcome it and eradicate it.
It's what we do with that knowledge of WP that counts.
WP doesn't insult you or blame you. If you took advantage of your whiteness then we might need to have conversation.
But to blame you for an accident of birth seems silly.
What's the answer? I am not sure but I sm sure that we need to talk to one another about how to overcome it.
I think one of BIG mistakes in the early days of desegregation was that whites made the decisions on how to desegregate. At that time we needed a more collaborative effort.
I think we need collaboration with people of color again.

---

Hey black guy

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

NO that is not how it works at all. I am waiting for valid proof but no one can provide that.

No one has been able to explain how it is white privilege to be on food stamps, or all the poor whites in numerous areas of the country on welfare.

Or any other example of white privilige.

The most I get is statements like yours that because "I don't get it, I don't see it."

---

It's very easy to explain. If you're a white person on food stamps, you're less likely to go to prison than a black person, on food stamps, who behaves the same way you do.

---

Since when did being on food stamps become a crime?

---

It's not a crime, though one could easily make that mistake listening to some conservatives talk about it.

---

Then why would a person of any color go to prison for being on food stamps as you implied?

---

They wouldn't. They'd be more likely to go to prison for whatever crimes they did or were accused of doing.

---

So they are going to prison because of a crime they commit?

So the food stamps have zero to do with them being sent to prison and is unrelated to an attempt to prove white privilege as I've asked.

---

You asked how a white person on food stamps is privileged. They're privileged to this extent: they're less likely to go to prison than a similarly situated black person who commits or doesn't commit the same crimes that the white person commits or doesn't commit. It may not be much, but it's something.

---

False equivalence.

Food stamps has no impact on going to or staying out of prison.

---

Bingo! So if it's not the food stamps, what is it?

---

The fact they committed a crime? Which still had nothing to do with food stamps. So why bring it up in the first place? You mentioned it now back it up.

quash said:

---

Bruce Leroy said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Not quite the same. It's a combination of systemic injustice and cultural decay.

---

Welfare system injustice has caused the cultural decay imo fwiw

It hurts me the older I get to see it and remain quiet

It's what I call being on the democrat plantation too

---

Wouldn't have needed the welfare system if we'd allowed blacks to participate in homeownership and Soc Sec.

---

I find that post interesting.

I am unaware of any national case law or litigation in reference to Social Security Act and how it was/has been applied to African Americans specifically.

Please reference a case if you know of one so I can read up on it.

Please disregard if "Soc Sec." had a alternate meaning.

---

The original law. It excluded ag and domestic workers because those fields were dominated by PoC and the Southern Democrats wanted none of that.

---

I had no idea blacks ONLY lived and worked on farms in the 1930s. I wonder how they were able to travel to cities like Chicago for race riots before then and return to the fields to work.

Bogus claim debunked.

Waco1947 said:

---

Hey White Guys,
Stop being so afraid and defensive.
White privilege is not your fault. No of you asked to be born white. It simply happened.
Acknowledging WP does not mean your racist. It simply means "Oh white privileges exists."
If you looking for blame then look to the founding fathers because they let black slavery stand and that set in motion white privilege. You're the beneficiary of WP. I am too.
But by being aware of WP I work to overcome it and eradicate it.
It's what we do with that knowledge of WP that counts.
WP doesn't insult you or blame you. If you took advantage of your whiteness then we might need to have conversation.
But to blame you for an accident of birth seems silly.
What's the answer? I am not sure but I sm sure that we need to talk to one another about how to overcome it.
I think one of BIG mistakes in the early days of desegregation was that whites made the decisions on how to desegregate. At that time we needed a more collaborative effort.
I think we need collaboration with people of color again.

---

If it exists then provide evidence of it. How is it white privileged for the poor whites on welfare?

quash said:

---

Bruce Leroy said:

---

quash said:

---

Bruce Leroy said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Not quite the same. It's a combination of systemic injustice and cultural decay.

---

Welfare system injustice has caused the cultural decay imo fwiw

It hurts me the older I get to see it and remain quiet

It's what I call being on the democrat plantation too

---

Wouldn't have needed the welfare system if we'd allowed blacks to participate in homeownership and Soc Sec.

---

I find that post interesting.

I am unaware of any national case law or litigation in reference to Social Security Act and how it was/has been applied to African Americans specifically.

Please reference a case if you know of one so I can read up on it.

Please disregard if "Soc Sec." had a alternate meaning.

---

The original law. It excluded ag and domestic workers because those fields were dominated by PoC and the Southern Democrats wanted none of that.

---

Interesting interpretation of the law. Since you didn't provide any historical legal challenges on the law, can you link to any historical articles in reference to the crafting of the law?

Were those two classifications of workers you identified the only two or was there others? And if so where they "dominated" by "Poc"?

In total population numbers in 1935 what race of people working as agricultural labor (in the US) would be the most is impacted?

What generally accepted economic event was going on in the 1930's (including 1935) that may/may influenced policy makers in determine which classification of workers should be exempt?

---

Lot of questions I have no interest in researching.

---

Translation- Lots of questions I have no answers for and zero proof of so I will run away from the questions.

quash said:

---

Bruce Leroy said:

---

quash said:

---

Bruce Leroy said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Not quite the same. It's a combination of systemic injustice and cultural decay.

---

Welfare system injustice has caused the cultural decay imo fwiw

It hurts me the older I get to see it and remain quiet

It's what I call being on the democrat plantation too

---

Wouldn't have needed the welfare system if we'd allowed blacks to participate in homeownership and Soc Sec.

---

I find that post interesting.

I am unaware of any national case law or litigation in reference to Social Security Act and how it was/has been applied to African Americans specifically.

Please reference a case if you know of one so I can read up on it.

Please disregard if "Soc Sec." had a alternate meaning.

---

The original law. It excluded ag and domestic workers because those fields were dominated by PoC and the Southern Democrats wanted none of that.

---

Interesting interpretation of the law. Since you didn't provide any historical legal challenges on the law, can you link to any historical articles in reference to the crafting of the law?

Were those two classifications of workers you identified the only two or was there others? And if so where they "dominated" by "Poc"?

In total population numbers in 1935 what race of people working as agricultural labor (in the US) would be the most is impacted?

What generally accepted economic event was going on in the 1930's (including 1935) that may/may influenced policy makers in determine which classification of workers should be exempt?

---

Lot of questions I have no interest in researching.

---

Not a problem. Good luck on supporting future points.

quash said:

---

Bruce Leroy said:

---

quash said:

---

Bruce Leroy said:

---

quash said:

---

Florda_mike said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Not quite the same. It's a combination of systemic injustice and cultural decay.

---

Welfare system injustice has caused the cultural decay imo fwiw

It hurts me the older I get to see it and remain quiet

It's what I call being on the democrat plantation too

---

Wouldn't have needed the welfare system if we'd allowed blacks to participate in homeownership and Soc Sec.

---

I find that post interesting.

I am unaware of any national case law or litigation in reference to Social Security Act and how it was/has been applied to African Americans specifically.

Please reference a case if you know of one so I can read up on it.

Please disregard if "Soc Sec." had a alternate meaning.

---

The original law. It excluded ag and domestic workers because those fields were dominated by PoC and the Southern Democrats wanted none of that.

---

Interesting interpretation of the law. Since you didn't provide any historical legal challenges on the law, can you link to any historical articles in reference to the crafting of the law?

Were those two classifications of workers you identified the only two or was there others? And if so where they "dominated" by "Poc"?

In total population numbers in 1935 what race of people working as agricultural labor (in the US) would be the most is impacted?

What generally accepted economic event was going on in the 1930's (including 1935) that may/may influenced policy makers in determine which classification of workers should be exempt?

---

Lot of questions I have no interest in researching.

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

7 pages and still zero examples of white privilege

---

You have to get it to see them. You don't so you don't. No biggie.

---

NO that is not how it works at all. I am waiting for valid proof but no one can provide that.

No one has been able to explain how it is white privilege to be on food stamps, or all the poor whites in numerous areas of the country on welfare.

Or any other example of white privilige.

The most I get is statements like yours that because "I don't get it, I don't see it."

---

It's very easy to explain. If you're a white person on food stamps, you're less likely to go to prison than a black person, on food stamps, who behaves the same way you do.

---

Since when did being on food stamps become a crime?

---

It's not a crime, though one could easily make that mistake listening to some conservatives talk about it.

---

Then why would a person of any color go to prison for being on food stamps as you implied?

---

They wouldn't. They'd be more likely to go to prison for whatever crimes they did or were accused of doing.

---

So they are going to prison because of a crime they commit?

So the food stamps have zero to do with them being sent to prison and is unrelated to an attempt to prove white privilege as I've asked.

---

You asked how a white person on food stamps is privileged. They're privileged to this extent: they're less likely to go to prison than a similarly situated black person who commits or doesn't commit the same crimes that the white person commits or doesn't commit. It may not be much, but it's something.

---

False equivalence.

Food stamps has no impact on going to or staying out of prison.

---

Bingo! So if it's not the food stamps, what is it?

---

The fact they committed a crime? Which still had nothing to do with food stamps. So why bring it up in the first place? You mentioned it now back it up.

---

I have no idea. You're the one who brought up food stamps.

No, it's not the fact they committed a crime. The white person and the black person are behaving the same way, remember.

Waco1947 said:

---

Hey White Guys,
Stop being so afraid and defensive.
White privilege is not your fault. No of you asked to be born white. It simply happened.
Acknowledging WP does not mean your racist. It simply means "Oh white privileges exists."
If you looking for blame then look to the founding fathers because they let black slavery stand and that set in motion white privilege. You're the beneficiary of WP. I am too.
But by being aware of WP I work to overcome it and eradicate it.
It's what we do with that knowledge of WP that counts.
WP doesn't insult you or blame you. If you took advantage of your whiteness then we might need to have conversation.
But to blame you for an accident of birth seems silly.
What's the answer? I am not sure but I sm sure that we need to talk to one another about how to overcome it.
I think one of BIG mistakes in the early days of desegregation was that whites made the decisions on how to desegregate. At that time we needed a more collaborative effort.
I think we need collaboration with people of color again.

---

Do I have half white privilege since I am mixed race?

fadskier said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Hey White Guys,
Stop being so afraid and defensive.
White privilege is not your fault. No of you asked to be born white. It simply happened.
Acknowledging WP does not mean your racist. It simply means "Oh white privileges exists."
If you looking for blame then look to the founding fathers because they let black slavery stand and that set in motion white privilege. You're the beneficiary of WP. I am too.
But by being aware of WP I work to overcome it and eradicate it.
It's what we do with that knowledge of WP that counts.
WP doesn't insult you or blame you. If you took advantage of your whiteness then we might need to have conversation.
But to blame you for an accident of birth seems silly.
What's the answer? I am not sure but I sm sure that we need to talk to one another about how to overcome it.
I think one of BIG mistakes in the early days of desegregation was that whites made the decisions on how to desegregate. At that time we needed a more collaborative effort.
I think we need collaboration with people of color again.

---

Do I have half white privilege since I am mixed race?

---

Only when it helps their cause

Florda_mike said:

---

fadskier said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Hey White Guys,
Stop being so afraid and defensive.
White privilege is not your fault. No of you asked to be born white. It simply happened.
Acknowledging WP does not mean your racist. It simply means "Oh white privileges exists."
If you looking for blame then look to the founding fathers because they let black slavery stand and that set in motion white privilege. You're the beneficiary of WP. I am too.
But by being aware of WP I work to overcome it and eradicate it.
It's what we do with that knowledge of WP that counts.
WP doesn't insult you or blame you. If you took advantage of your whiteness then we might need to have conversation.
But to blame you for an accident of birth seems silly.
What's the answer? I am not sure but I sm sure that we need to talk to one another about how to overcome it.
I think one of BIG mistakes in the early days of desegregation was that whites made the decisions on how to desegregate. At that time we needed a more collaborative effort.
I think we need collaboration with people of color again.

---

Do I have half white privilege since I am mixed race?

---

Only when it helps their cause

---

Well since I don't believe it exists...except in excuse-making, low-self esteem, dependent individuals...