Game. Set. Match.Sam Lowry said:1) Guns are used successfully in self-defense far more often than they cause accidental death. Therefore your statement is false.Waco1947 said:no you haven't. You answer questions you want to answer.cowboycwr said:And Cowboycwr has explained that to you. Multiple times. But you fail to listen because you are not all ears. You only listen to things that further your beliefs and refuse to accept anything that would hurt your world view.Waco1947 said:
And
Waco1947 said:
. What part is a lie?
Safety is compromised
Guns in the home
Endangerment to friends and family
Which is the lie? I'm all ears
So answer right next the statement please
1) Safety is compromised with
Guns in the home
2) Endangerment to friends and family
So show me the lies.
2) The problem here is your misuse of the term "endangerment." We've established that guns are dangerous in the same way as cars and many other tools. To say they endanger friends and family in that sense is true, but also meaningless. Endangerment in the morally or legally significant sense involves something more -- not just everyday, garden variety danger but also an element of excessiveness, unreasonableness, or recklessness. To say that guns endanger friends and family in this sense would be meaningful, if only it were true.
The lie you're telling is this. Having established that guns "endanger" friends and family in the former, meaningless sense of the word, you disingenuously and stubbornly pretend that you've proven endangerment in the latter sense.
This is a logical fallacy known as equivocation.
End of thread.